# Description
This change sorts completions for files and directories by the ascending
ordering method, related to issue:
[#8023](https://github.com/nushell/nushell/issues/8023)
Currently the Suggestions are being sorted twice, so it's now following
the convention from `completion/base.rs` to match on the
`self.get_sort_by()` result.
# User-Facing Changes
Previously the suggestions were being sorted by the Levenshtein method:
```
/home/rdevenney/projects/open_source/nushell| cd
src/ wix/ docs/ tests/
assets/ crates/ docker/ images/
target/ benches/ pkg_mgrs/ .git/
.cargo/ .github/
```
Now when you tab for autocompletions, they show up in ascending
alphabetical order as shown below (with hidden files/folders at the
end).
```
/home/rdevenney/projects/open_source/nushell| cd
assets/ benches/ crates/ docker/
docs/ images/ pkg_mgrs/ src/
target/ tests/ wix/ .cargo/
.git/ .github/
```
And when you've already typed a bit of the path:
```
/home/rdevenney/projects/open_source/nushell| cd crates/nu
crates/nu-cli/ crates/nu-color-config/ crates/nu-command/
crates/nu-engine/ crates/nu-explore/ crates/nu-glob/
crates/nu-json/ crates/nu-parser/ crates/nu-path/
crates/nu-plugin/ crates/nu-pretty-hex/ crates/nu-protocol/
crates/nu-system/ crates/nu-table/ crates/nu-term-grid/
crates/nu-test-support/ crates/nu-utils/ crates/nu_plugin_custom_values/
crates/nu_plugin_example/ crates/nu_plugin_formats/ crates/nu_plugin_gstat/
crates/nu_plugin_inc/ crates/nu_plugin_python/ crates/nu_plugin_query/
```
And another for when there are files and directories present:
```
/home/rdevenney/projects/open_source/nushell/crates/nu-cli/src| nvim 02/16/2023 08:22:16 AM
commands.rs completions/ config_files.rs eval_file.rs
lib.rs menus/ nu_highlight.rs print.rs
prompt.rs prompt_update.rs reedline_config.rs repl.rs
syntax_highlight.rs util.rs validation.rs
```
# Tests + Formatting
Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes.
Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands:
[*] `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting
(`cargo fmt --all` applies these changes)
[*] `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used -A
clippy::needless_collect` to check that you're using the standard code
style
[*] `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass
# After Submitting
If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the
documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the
PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date.
# Description
Reverts the PR #7779 which breaks subcommand completions. The issues
#7648 and #7754 thus still need fixing.
This reverts commit 8acced5.
# User-Facing Changes
Enables subcommand completions.
Unfortunately, also brings back the completion panic if alias is shorter
than the command name.
# Tests + Formatting
Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes.
Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands:
- `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo
fmt --all` applies these changes)
- `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used -A
clippy::needless_collect` to check that you're using the standard code
style
- `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass
# After Submitting
If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the
documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the
PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date.
# Description
This PR attempts to fix the completions issue where, on Windows,
completions wouldn't get generated from items in your path environment
variable. This seemed to be down to `PATH` vs `Path`. So, I tried to add
a new function that we can use anywhere to avoid this problem.
# User-Facing Changes
_(List of all changes that impact the user experience here. This helps
us keep track of breaking changes.)_
# Tests + Formatting
Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes.
Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands:
- `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo
fmt --all` applies these changes)
- `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used -A
clippy::needless_collect` to check that you're using the standard code
style
- `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass
# After Submitting
If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the
documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the
PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date.
# Description
Lint: `clippy::uninlined_format_args`
More readable in most situations.
(May be slightly confusing for modifier format strings
https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/fmt/index.html#formatting-parameters)
Alternative to #7865
# User-Facing Changes
None intended
# Tests + Formatting
(Ran `cargo +stable clippy --fix --workspace -- -A clippy::all -D
clippy::uninlined_format_args` to achieve this. Depends on Rust `1.67`)
# Description
This adds a `number` command that will enumerate the input, and add an
`index` and `item` record for each item. The `index` is the number of
the item in the input stream, and `item` is the original value of the
item.
```
> ls | number | get 14
╭───────┬────────────────────────────╮
│ index │ 14 │
│ │ ╭──────────┬─────────────╮ │
│ item │ │ name │ crates │ │
│ │ │ type │ dir │ │
│ │ │ size │ 832 B │ │
│ │ │ modified │ 2 weeks ago │ │
│ │ ╰──────────┴─────────────╯ │
╰───────┴────────────────────────────╯
```
# User-Facing Changes
This adds a `number` command.
# Tests + Formatting
Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes.
Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands:
- `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo
fmt --all` applies these changes)
- `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used -A
clippy::needless_collect` to check that you're using the standard code
style
- `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass
# After Submitting
If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the
documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the
PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date.
# Description
Fixes: #7706
# User-Facing Changes
# Tests + Formatting
Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes.
Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands:
- `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo
fmt --all` applies these changes)
- `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used -A
clippy::needless_collect` to check that you're using the standard code
style
- `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass
# After Submitting
If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the
documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the
PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date.
Co-authored-by: Stefan Holderbach <sholderbach@users.noreply.github.com>
# Description
This PR adds the `mime-type` to the `type` column if you add the
`--mime-type(-m)` flag to `ls`.
<img width="853" alt="Screenshot 2022-12-27 at 11 43 20 AM"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/343840/209705499-27fe40fe-0356-4d9d-97f2-4b2dc52e0963.png">
<img width="781" alt="Screenshot 2022-12-27 at 11 45 53 AM"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/343840/209705509-4d677389-fd68-401e-a7af-3fc6052743b6.png">
# User-Facing Changes
If you specify the `-m` flag, you get the "guessed at" mime type. The
guess is based on the file name and uses this crate
https://docs.rs/mime_guess/latest/mime_guess/ for the guessing.
Part of issue #7612 and and #7524
There's some debate on if the `mime-type` should be added to the `type`
column or if there should be a separate `mime` column. I tend to lean on
the side of `type` since it's technically a type and it's only in that
column if you ask it to be there. Also, I'd prefer to reuse a column
rather than having a list of sprawling columns. Also, as @KodiCraft
suggested, there is precedence as with `ls -d` where the summed size is
in the size column.
I could go either way and if someone wants to create a `mime` column,
we'd probably accept it.
# Tests + Formatting
Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes.
Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands:
- `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo
fmt --all` applies these changes)
- `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used -A
clippy::needless_collect` to check that you're using the standard code
style
- `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass
# After Submitting
If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the
documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the
PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date.
* start working on source-env
* WIP
* Get most tests working, still one to go
* Fix file-relative paths; Report parser error
* Fix merge conflicts; Restore source as deprecated
* Tests: Use source-env; Remove redundant tests
* Fmt
* Respect hidden env vars
* Fix file-relative eval for source-env
* Add file-relative eval to "overlay use"
* Use FILE_PWD only in source-env and "overlay use"
* Ignore new tests for now
This will be another issue
* Throw an error if setting FILE_PWD manually
* Fix source-related test failures
* Fix nu-check to respect FILE_PWD
* Fix corrupted spans in source-env shell errors
* Fix up some references to old source
* Remove deprecation message
* Re-introduce deleted tests
Co-authored-by: kubouch <kubouch@gmail.com>
This PR merges all the completions tests into one file.
The reason for them to be separated was organization, so we wouldn't need to scroll a huge file.
But that came with another issue, because rust generates a new binary for each completion test file and each completion test depends on Nu looks like all the dataframes were coming into each test file as well (as pointed by @rgwood
