This PR should close
1. #10327
1. #13667
1. #13810
1. #14129
# Description
For `#` to start a comment, then it either need to be the first
character of the token or prefixed with ` ` (space).
So now you can do this:
```
~/Projects/nushell> 1..10 | each {echo test#testing } 12/05/2024 05:37:19 PM
╭───┬──────────────╮
│ 0 │ test#testing │
│ 1 │ test#testing │
│ 2 │ test#testing │
│ 3 │ test#testing │
│ 4 │ test#testing │
│ 5 │ test#testing │
│ 6 │ test#testing │
│ 7 │ test#testing │
│ 8 │ test#testing │
│ 9 │ test#testing │
╰───┴──────────────╯
```
# User-Facing Changes
It is a breaking change if anyone expected comments to start in the
middle of a string without any prefixing ` ` (space).
# Tests + Formatting
Did all:
- `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo
fmt --all` applies these changes)
- `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used` to
check that you're using the standard code style
- `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass (on Windows make
sure to [enable developer
mode](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/apps/get-started/developer-mode-features-and-debugging))
- `cargo run -- -c "use toolkit.nu; toolkit test stdlib"` to run the
tests for the standard library
# After Submitting
I cant see that I need to update anything in [the
documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) but please
point me in the direction if there is anything.
This PR should close
1. #10327
1. #13667
1. #13810
1. #14129
# Description
For `#` to start a comment, then it either need to be the first
character of the token or prefixed with ` ` (space).
So now you can do this:
```
~/Projects/nushell> 1..10 | each {echo test#testing } 12/05/2024 05:37:19 PM
╭───┬──────────────╮
│ 0 │ test#testing │
│ 1 │ test#testing │
│ 2 │ test#testing │
│ 3 │ test#testing │
│ 4 │ test#testing │
│ 5 │ test#testing │
│ 6 │ test#testing │
│ 7 │ test#testing │
│ 8 │ test#testing │
│ 9 │ test#testing │
╰───┴──────────────╯
```
# User-Facing Changes
It is a breaking change if anyone expected comments to start in the
middle of a string without any prefixing ` ` (space).
# Tests + Formatting
Did all:
- `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo
fmt --all` applies these changes)
- `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used` to
check that you're using the standard code style
- `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass (on Windows make
sure to [enable developer
mode](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/apps/get-started/developer-mode-features-and-debugging))
- `cargo run -- -c "use toolkit.nu; toolkit test stdlib"` to run the
tests for the standard library
# After Submitting
I cant see that I need to update anything in [the
documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) but please
point me in the direction if there is anything.
---------
Co-authored-by: Wind <WindSoilder@outlook.com>
# Description
Old code was comparing remaining positional arguments with total number
of arguments, where it should've compared remaining positional with
with remaining arguments of any kind. This means that if a function was
given too few arguments, `calculate_end_span` would believe that it
actually had too many arguments, since after parsing the first few
arguments, the number of remaining arguments needed were fewer than the
*total* number of arguments, of which we had used several.
Fixes#9072
Fixes: https://github.com/nushell/nushell/issues/13930
Fixes: https://github.com/nushell/nushell/issues/12069
Fixes: https://github.com/nushell/nushell/issues/8385
Extracted from #10381
## Bonus
It also improves the error handling on missing positional arguments
before keywords (no longer crashing since #9851). Instead of just giving
the keyword to the parser for the missing positional, we give an
explicit error about a missing positional argument. I would like better
descriptions than "missing var_name" though, but I'm not sure if that's
available without
Old error
```
Error: nu::parser::parse_mismatch
× Parse mismatch during operation.
╭─[entry #1:1:1]
1 │ let = if foo
· ┬
· ╰── expected valid variable name
╰────
```
New error
```
Error: nu::parser::missing_positional
× Missing required positional argument.
╭─[entry #18:1:1]
1 │ let = foo
· ┬
· ╰── missing var_name
╰────
help: Usage: let <var_name> = <initial_value>
```
# User-Facing Changes
The program `alias = = =` is no longer accepted by the parser
# Description
The meaning of the word usage is specific to describing how a command
function is *used* and not a synonym for general description. Usage can
be used to describe the SYNOPSIS or EXAMPLES sections of a man page
where the permitted argument combinations are shown or example *uses*
are given.
Let's not confuse people and call it what it is a description.
Our `help` command already creates its own *Usage* section based on the
available arguments and doesn't refer to the description with usage.
# User-Facing Changes
`help commands` and `scope commands` will now use `description` or
`extra_description`
`usage`-> `description`
`extra_usage` -> `extra_description`
Breaking change in the plugin protocol:
In the signature record communicated with the engine.
`usage`-> `description`
`extra_usage` -> `extra_description`
The same rename also takes place for the methods on
`SimplePluginCommand` and `PluginCommand`
# Tests + Formatting
- Updated plugin protocol specific changes
# After Submitting
- [ ] update plugin protocol doc
# Description
As per our Wednesday meeting, this adds a parse error when something
that would be parsed as an external call is present at the top level,
unless the head of the external call begins with a caret (to make it
explicit).
I tried to make the error quite descriptive about what should be done.
# User-Facing Changes
These now cause a parse error:
```nushell
$foo = bar
$foo = `bar`
```
These would have been interpreted as strings before this version, but
now they'd be interpreted as external calls. This behavior is consistent
with `let`/`mut` (which is unaffected by this change).
Here is an example of the error:
```
Error: × External command calls must be explicit in assignments
╭─[entry #3:1:8]
1 │ $foo = bar
· ─┬─
· ╰── add a caret (^) before the command name if you intended to run and capture its output
╰────
help: the parsing of assignments was changed in 0.97.0, and this would have previously been treated as a string.
Alternatively, quote the string with single or double quotes to avoid it being interpreted as a command name. This
restriction may be removed in a future release.
```
# Tests + Formatting
Tests added to cover the change. Note made about it being temporary.
# Description
This makes assignment operations and `const` behave the same way `let`
and `mut` do, absorbing the rest of the pipeline.
Changes the lexer to be able to recognize assignment operators as a
separate token, and then makes the lite parser continue to push spans
into the same command regardless of any redirections or pipes if an
assignment operator is encountered. Because the pipeline is no longer
split up by the lite parser at this point, it's trivial to just parse
the right hand side as if it were a subexpression not contained within
parentheses.
# User-Facing Changes
Big breaking change. These are all now possible:
```nushell
const path = 'a' | path join 'b'
mut x = 2
$x = random int
$x = [1 2 3] | math sum
$env.FOO = random chars
```
In the past, these would have led to (an attempt at) bare word string
parsing. So while `$env.FOO = bar` would have previously set the
environment variable `FOO` to the string `"bar"`, it now tries to run
the command named `bar`, hence the major breaking change.
However, this is desirable because it is very consistent - if you see
the `=`, you can just assume it absorbs everything else to the right of
it.
# Tests + Formatting
Added tests for the new behaviour. Adjusted some existing tests that
depended on the right hand side of assignments being parsed as
barewords.
# After Submitting
- [ ] release notes (breaking change!)
Fixesnushell/nushell#13207
# Description
This fixes the parsing of command usage when that command comes from a
file with CRLF line endings.
See nushell/nushell#13207 for more details.
# User-Facing Changes
Users on Windows will get correct autocompletion for `std` commands.
This PR should close#7147
# Description
Merged src/tests into /tests to produce a single binary.
# User-Facing Changes
No user facing changes
# Tests + Formatting
Moved tests. Tollkit check pr pass.
# After Submitting
---------
Co-authored-by: Ian Manske <ian.manske@pm.me>
