# Description
Constructing the internals of `Record` without checking the lengths is
bad. (also incompatible with changes to how we store records)
- Use `Record::from_raw_cols_vals` in dataframe code
- Use `record!` macro in dataframe test
- Use `record!` in `nu-color-config` tests
- Stop direct record construction in `nu-command`
- Refactor table construction in `from nuon`
# User-Facing Changes
None
# Tests + Formatting
No new tests, updated tests in equal fashion
# Description
Hi! I updated the samples of `str trim` because there were repeated and
clarified the explanations
# User-Facing Changes
Yes! I send the details here:
(`old` is version `88.1` not the latest main)
# Tests + Formatting
~~I ran `toolkit check pr` successfully~~
There was a tiny problem, a test I never touched now it's failing
```nu
(^echo a | complete) == {stdout: "a\n", exit_code: 0}
```
should output `true` but outputs `false`, both in my running `nu`
version and in my PR version
This make the test `nu-command::main commands::complete::basic` fail
located in `crates\nu-command\tests\commands\complete.rs`
# After Submitting
I'm not sure if I need to update nushell.github.io, some of the help is
auto-generated, but maybe not all?
I can file a PR if needed
# Description
This updates all the positional arguments (except with
`--features=dataframe` or `--features=extra`) to start with an uppercase
letter and end with a period.
Part of #5066, specifically [this
comment](/nushell/nushell/issues/5066#issuecomment-1421528910)
Some arguments had example data removed from them because it also
appears in the examples.
There are other inconsistencies in positional arguments I noticed while
making the tests pass which I will bring up in #5066.
# User-Facing Changes
Positional arguments are now consistent
# Tests + Formatting
- 🟢 `toolkit fmt`
- 🟢 `toolkit clippy`
- 🟢 `toolkit test`
- 🟢 `toolkit test stdlib`
# After Submitting
Automatic documentation updates
this will allow to run
```nushell
format date --list | get 0
```
and get
```
─────────────┬───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
Specification│%Y
Example │2023
Description │The full proleptic Gregorian year, zero-padded to 4 digits.
─────────────┴───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
```
instead of currently
```
Error: nu::parser::input_type_mismatch
× Command does not support string input.
╭─[entry #2:1:1]
1 │ format date --list | get 0
· ─┬─
· ╰── command doesn't support string input
╰────
```
# Description
Replace `.to_string()` used in `GenericError` with `.into()` as
`.into()` seems more popular
Replace `Vec::new()` used in `GenericError` with `vec![]` as `vec![]`
seems more popular
(There are so, so many)
<!--
if this PR closes one or more issues, you can automatically link the PR
with
them by using one of the [*linking
keywords*](https://docs.github.com/en/issues/tracking-your-work-with-issues/linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue#linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue-using-a-keyword),
e.g.
- this PR should close #xxxx
- fixes #xxxx
you can also mention related issues, PRs or discussions!
-->
# Description
<!--
Thank you for improving Nushell. Please, check our [contributing
guide](../CONTRIBUTING.md) and talk to the core team before making major
changes.
Description of your pull request goes here. **Provide examples and/or
screenshots** if your changes affect the user experience.
-->
This is a continuation of #11190. Try to add `OutOfBounds` error. It
seems that `OutOfBounds` is more accurate than `InvalidRange`.
# User-Facing Changes
<!-- List of all changes that impact the user experience here. This
helps us keep track of breaking changes. -->
# Tests + Formatting
<!--
Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes.
Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands:
- `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo
fmt --all` applies these changes)
- `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used` to
check that you're using the standard code style
- `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass (on Windows make
sure to [enable developer
mode](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/apps/get-started/developer-mode-features-and-debugging))
- `cargo run -- -c "use std testing; testing run-tests --path
crates/nu-std"` to run the tests for the standard library
> **Note**
> from `nushell` you can also use the `toolkit` as follows
> ```bash
> use toolkit.nu # or use an `env_change` hook to activate it
automatically
> toolkit check pr
> ```
-->
# After Submitting
<!-- If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the
documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the
PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date.
-->
follow-up to
- https://github.com/nushell/nushell/pull/10798
> **Important**
> wait for between 0.87 and 0.88 to land this
# Description
once again, after deprecation comes removal 😌
# User-Facing Changes
`size` is now removed and `str size` should be used
# Tests + Formatting
# After Submitting
# Description
Add an extension trait `IgnoreCaseExt` to nu_utils which adds some case
insensitivity helpers, and use them throughout nu to improve the
handling of case insensitivity. Proper case folding is done via unicase,
which is already a dependency via mime_guess from nu-command.
In actuality a lot of code still does `to_lowercase`, because unicase
only provides immediate comparison and doesn't expose a `to_folded_case`
yet. And since we do a lot of `contains`/`starts_with`/`ends_with`, it's
not sufficient to just have `eq_ignore_case`. But if we get access in
the future, this makes us ready to use it with a change in one place.
Plus, it's clearer what the purpose is at the call site to call
`to_folded_case` instead of `to_lowercase` if it's exclusively for the
purpose of case insensitive comparison, even if it just does
`to_lowercase` still.
# User-Facing Changes
- Some commands that were supposed to be case insensitive remained only
insensitive to ASCII case (a-z), and now are case insensitive w.r.t.
non-ASCII characters as well.
# Tests + Formatting
- 🟢 `toolkit fmt`
- 🟢 `toolkit clippy`
- 🟢 `toolkit test`
- 🟢 `toolkit test stdlib`
---------
Co-authored-by: Stefan Holderbach <sholderbach@users.noreply.github.com>
# Description
Since #10841 the goal is to remove the implementation details of
`Record` outside of core operations.
To this end use Record iterators and map-like accessors in a bunch of
places. In this PR I try to collect the boring cases where I don't
expect any dramatic performance impacts or don't have doubts about the
correctness afterwards
- Use checked record construction in `nu_plugin_example`
- Use `Record::into_iter` in `columns`
- Use `Record` iterators in `headers` cmd
- Use explicit record iterators in `split-by`
- Use `Record::into_iter` in variable completions
- Use `Record::values` iterator in `into sqlite`
- Use `Record::iter_mut` for-loop in `default`
- Change `nu_engine::nonexistent_column` to use iterator
- Use `Record::columns` iter in `nu-cmd-base`
- Use `Record::get_index` in `nu-command/network/http`
- Use `Record.insert()` in `merge`
- Refactor `move` to use encapsulated record API
- Use `Record.insert()` in `explore`
- Use proper `Record` API in `explore`
- Remove defensiveness around record in `explore`
- Use encapsulated record API in more `nu-command`s
# User-Facing Changes
None intentional
# Tests + Formatting
(-)
# Description
This is easy to do with rust-analyzer, but I didn't want to just pump
these all out without feedback.
Part of #10700
# User-Facing Changes
None
# Tests + Formatting
- 🟢 `toolkit fmt`
- 🟢 `toolkit clippy`
- 🟢 `toolkit test`
- 🟢 `toolkit test stdlib`
# After Submitting
N/A
---------
Co-authored-by: Stefan Holderbach <sholderbach@users.noreply.github.com>
# Description
Use `record!` macro instead of defining two separate `vec!` for `cols`
and `vals` when appropriate.
This visually aligns the key with the value.
Further more you don't have to deal with the construction of `Record {
cols, vals }` so we can hide the implementation details in the future.
## State
Not covering all possible commands yet, also some tests/examples are
better expressed by creating cols and vals separately.
# User/Developer-Facing Changes
The examples and tests should read more natural. No relevant functional
change
# Bycatch
Where I noticed it I replaced usage of `Value` constructors with
`Span::test_data()` or `Span::unknown()` to the `Value::test_...`
constructors. This should make things more readable and also simplify
changes to the `Span` system in the future.
# Description
as we can see in the [documentation of
`str.to_lowercase`](https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/primitive.str.html#method.to_lowercase),
not only ASCII symbols have lower and upper variants.
- `str upcase` uses the correct method to convert the string
7ac5a01e2f/crates/nu-command/src/strings/str_/case/upcase.rs (L93)
- `str downcase` incorrectly converts only ASCII characters
7ac5a01e2f/crates/nu-command/src/strings/str_/case/downcase.rs (L124)
this PR uses `str.to_lower_case` instead of `str.to_ascii_lowercase` in
`str downcase`.
# User-Facing Changes
- upcase still works fine
```nushell
~ l> "ὀδυσσεύς" | str upcase
ὈΔΥΣΣΕΎΣ
```
- downcase now works
👉 before
```nushell
~ l> "ὈΔΥΣΣΕΎΣ" | str downcase
ὈΔΥΣΣΕΎΣ
```
👉 after
```nushell
~ l> "ὈΔΥΣΣΕΎΣ" | str downcase
ὀδυσσεύς
```
# Tests + Formatting
- 🟢 `toolkit fmt`
- 🟢 `toolkit clippy`
- ⚫ `toolkit test`
- ⚫ `toolkit test stdlib`
adds two tests
- `non_ascii_upcase`
- `non_ascii_downcase`
# After Submitting
<!--
if this PR closes one or more issues, you can automatically link the PR
with
them by using one of the [*linking
keywords*](https://docs.github.com/en/issues/tracking-your-work-with-issues/linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue#linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue-using-a-keyword),
e.g.
- this PR should close #xxxx
- fixes #xxxx
you can also mention related issues, PRs or discussions!
-->
# Description
<!--
Thank you for improving Nushell. Please, check our [contributing
guide](../CONTRIBUTING.md) and talk to the core team before making major
changes.
Description of your pull request goes here. **Provide examples and/or
screenshots** if your changes affect the user experience.
-->
Rename `str size` to `str stats`, for more detail see:
https://github.com/nushell/nushell/pull/10772
# User-Facing Changes
<!-- List of all changes that impact the user experience here. This
helps us keep track of breaking changes. -->
# Tests + Formatting
<!--
Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes.
Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands:
- `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo
fmt --all` applies these changes)
- `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used` to
check that you're using the standard code style
- `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass (on Windows make
sure to [enable developer
mode](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/apps/get-started/developer-mode-features-and-debugging))
- `cargo run -- -c "use std testing; testing run-tests --path
crates/nu-std"` to run the tests for the standard library
> **Note**
> from `nushell` you can also use the `toolkit` as follows
> ```bash
> use toolkit.nu # or use an `env_change` hook to activate it
automatically
> toolkit check pr
> ```
-->
# After Submitting
<!-- If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the
documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the
PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date.
-->
related to
-
https://discord.com/channels/601130461678272522/614613939334152217/1164530991931605062
# Description
it appears `size` is a command that operates on `string`s only and gives
the user information about the chars, graphemes and bytes of a string.
this looks like a command that should be a subcommand to `str` 😏
this PR
- adds `str size`
- deprecates `size`
`size` is planned to be removed in 0.88
# User-Facing Changes
`str size` can be used for the same result as `size`.
# Tests + Formatting
# After Submitting
write a removal PR for `size`
This pr fix clippy warnings in latest clippy version(1.72.0):
Unfortunally it's not easy to handle for [try
fold](https://rust-lang.github.io/rust-clippy/master/index.html#/manual_try_fold)
warning in `start command`
Refer to known issue:
> This lint doesn’t take into account whether a function does something
on the failure case, i.e., whether short-circuiting will affect
behavior. Refactoring to try_fold is not desirable in those cases.
That's the case for our code, which does something on the failure case.
So this pr is making a little refactor on `try_commands`.
related to
- https://github.com/nushell/nushell/pull/10038
# Description
`str replace --string` has been deprecated in
https://github.com/nushell/nushell/pull/10038 and should be removed
before 0.85.
this PR removes the `--string` option from `str replace` completely.
# User-Facing Changes
`str replace --string` will no longer work and will give an error
instead of a warning.
# Description
Apparently some strftime formats are already localized and when you
"double localize" them, they don't work. This PR fixes that so that %x
%X %r %c don't go through the localization step.
Example: %x %X
### Before
```nushell
❯ date now | format date "%x %X %p"
09/08/2023 08 AM
```
### After
```nushell
❯ date now | format date "%x %X %p"
09/08/23 08:09:14 AM
```
I started to make one format_datetime to rule them all but one returns a
string and one returns a value. If we convert to the string, we lose the
nice error messages. If we change to value, more code has to be changed
elsewhere. So, I decided to just leave two functions.
# User-Facing Changes
<!-- List of all changes that impact the user experience here. This
helps us keep track of breaking changes. -->
# Tests + Formatting
<!--
Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes.
Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands:
- `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo
fmt --all` applies these changes)
- `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used` to
check that you're using the standard code style
- `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass (on Windows make
sure to [enable developer
mode](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/apps/get-started/developer-mode-features-and-debugging))
- `cargo run -- -c "use std testing; testing run-tests --path
crates/nu-std"` to run the tests for the standard library
> **Note**
> from `nushell` you can also use the `toolkit` as follows
> ```bash
> use toolkit.nu # or use an `env_change` hook to activate it
automatically
> toolkit check pr
> ```
-->
# After Submitting
<!-- If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the
documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the
PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date.
-->
# Description
before this PR,
```nushell
> $.a.b | describe
cell path
```
which feels inconsistent with the `cell-path` type annotation, like in
```nushell
> def foo [x: cell-path] { $x | describe }; foo $.a.b
cell path
```
this PR changes the name of the "cell path" type from `cell path` to
`cell-path`
# User-Facing Changes
`cell path` is now `cell-path` in the output of `describe`.
this might be a breaking change in some scripts.
same goes with
- `list stream` -> `list-stream`
- `match pattern` -> `match-pattern`
# Tests + Formatting
- 🟢 `toolkit fmt`
- 🟢 `toolkit clippy`
- ⚫ `toolkit test`
- ⚫ `toolkit test stdlib`
this PR adds a new `cell_path_type` test to make sure it stays equal to
`cell-path` in the future.
# After Submitting
---------
Co-authored-by: Darren Schroeder <343840+fdncred@users.noreply.github.com>
<!--
if this PR closes one or more issues, you can automatically link the PR
with
them by using one of the [*linking
keywords*](https://docs.github.com/en/issues/tracking-your-work-with-issues/linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue#linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue-using-a-keyword),
e.g.
- this PR should close #xxxx
- fixes #xxxx
you can also mention related issues, PRs or discussions!
-->
# Description
<!--
Thank you for improving Nushell. Please, check our [contributing
guide](../CONTRIBUTING.md) and talk to the core team before making major
changes.
Description of your pull request goes here. **Provide examples and/or
screenshots** if your changes affect the user experience.
-->
rustfmt 1.6.0 has added support for formatting [let-else
statements](https://doc.rust-lang.org/rust-by-example/flow_control/let_else.html)
See https://github.com/rust-lang/rustfmt/blob/master/CHANGELOG.md#added
# User-Facing Changes
<!-- List of all changes that impact the user experience here. This
helps us keep track of breaking changes. -->
# Tests + Formatting
<!--
Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes.
Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands:
- `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo
fmt --all` applies these changes)
- `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used` to
check that you're using the standard code style
- `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass (on Windows make
sure to [enable developer
mode](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/apps/get-started/developer-mode-features-and-debugging))
- `cargo run -- -c "use std testing; testing run-tests --path
crates/nu-std"` to run the tests for the standard library
> **Note**
> from `nushell` you can also use the `toolkit` as follows
> ```bash
> use toolkit.nu # or use an `env_change` hook to activate it
automatically
> toolkit check pr
> ```
-->
# After Submitting
<!-- If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the
documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the
PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date.
-->
# Description
As part of the refactor to split spans off of Value, this moves to using
helper functions to create values, and using `.span()` instead of
matching span out of Value directly.
Hoping to get a few more helping hands to finish this, as there are a
lot of commands to update :)
# User-Facing Changes
<!-- List of all changes that impact the user experience here. This
helps us keep track of breaking changes. -->
# Tests + Formatting
<!--
Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes.
Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands:
- `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo
fmt --all` applies these changes)
- `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used` to
check that you're using the standard code style
- `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass (on Windows make
sure to [enable developer
mode](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/apps/get-started/developer-mode-features-and-debugging))
- `cargo run -- -c "use std testing; testing run-tests --path
crates/nu-std"` to run the tests for the standard library
> **Note**
> from `nushell` you can also use the `toolkit` as follows
> ```bash
> use toolkit.nu # or use an `env_change` hook to activate it
automatically
> toolkit check pr
> ```
-->
# After Submitting
<!-- If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the
documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the
PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date.
-->
---------
Co-authored-by: Darren Schroeder <343840+fdncred@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: WindSoilder <windsoilder@outlook.com>
# Description
Allow `decode` command to guess the encoding of input if no encoding
name is given.
# User-Facing Changes
* `decode` now has an optional parameter instead of required one. User
can just run `decode` to let the command automatically detect encoding
and convert it to utf-8.
<img width="575" alt="Example"
src="https://github.com/nushell/nushell/assets/1991933/03a0ba11-910e-4db9-89aa-79cfec06893f">
* Based on the detect result, user may have to give a encoding name
<img width="572" alt="Error Sample1"
src="https://github.com/nushell/nushell/assets/1991933/f21fda85-1f04-4cb3-9feb-cb9fb7dcee07">
or get informed that the input is not supported by `decode`
<img width="568" alt="Error Sample2"
src="https://github.com/nushell/nushell/assets/1991933/dd3cc4c0-f119-493e-8609-d07594fc055a">
# Tests + Formatting
* `cargo fmt --all -- --check` : OK
* `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used -A
clippy::needless_collect -A clippy::result_large_err`: OK
* `cargo test --workspace` : OK
* `cargo run -- -c "use std testing; testing run-tests --path
crates/nu-std"`: OK
# After Submitting
[Command document](https://www.nushell.sh/commands/docs/decode.html) is
auto-generated and requires no action.
---------
Co-authored-by: Horasal <horsal@horsal.dev>
# Description
This doesn't really do much that the user could see, but it helps get us
ready to do the steps of the refactor to split the span off of Value, so
that values can be spanless. This allows us to have top-level values
that can hold both a Value and a Span, without requiring that all values
have them.
We expect to see significant memory reduction by removing so many
unnecessary spans from values. For example, a table of 100,000 rows and
5 columns would have a savings of ~8megs in just spans that are almost
always duplicated.
# User-Facing Changes
Nothing yet
# Tests + Formatting
<!--
Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes.
Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands:
- `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo
fmt --all` applies these changes)
- `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used -A
clippy::needless_collect -A clippy::result_large_err` to check that
you're using the standard code style
- `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass
- `cargo run -- -c "use std testing; testing run-tests --path
crates/nu-std"` to run the tests for the standard library
> **Note**
> from `nushell` you can also use the `toolkit` as follows
> ```bash
> use toolkit.nu # or use an `env_change` hook to activate it
automatically
> toolkit check pr
> ```
-->
# After Submitting
<!-- If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the
documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the
PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date.
-->
# Description
This PR creates a new `Record` type to reduce duplicate code and
possibly bugs as well. (This is an edited version of #9648.)
- `Record` implements `FromIterator` and `IntoIterator` and so can be
iterated over or collected into. For example, this helps with
conversions to and from (hash)maps. (Also, no more
`cols.iter().zip(vals)`!)
- `Record` has a `push(col, val)` function to help insure that the
number of columns is equal to the number of values. I caught a few
potential bugs thanks to this (e.g. in the `ls` command).
- Finally, this PR also adds a `record!` macro that helps simplify
record creation. It is used like so:
```rust
record! {
"key1" => some_value,
"key2" => Value::string("text", span),
"key3" => Value::int(optional_int.unwrap_or(0), span),
"key4" => Value::bool(config.setting, span),
}
```
Since macros hinder formatting, etc., the right hand side values should
be relatively short and sweet like the examples above.
Where possible, prefer `record!` or `.collect()` on an iterator instead
of multiple `Record::push`s, since the first two automatically set the
record capacity and do less work overall.
# User-Facing Changes
Besides the changes in `nu-protocol` the only other breaking changes are
to `nu-table::{ExpandedTable::build_map, JustTable::kv_table}`.
# Description
This PR updates some `Example` tests so that they work again. The only
one I couldn't figure out is the one in the `filter` command. It should
work but does not. However, I left the test in because it's valuable, it
just has a `None` result. I'd like to fix this but I'm not sure how.
# User-Facing Changes
<!-- List of all changes that impact the user experience here. This
helps us keep track of breaking changes. -->
# Tests + Formatting
<!--
Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes.
Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands:
- `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo
fmt --all` applies these changes)
- `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used -A
clippy::needless_collect -A clippy::result_large_err` to check that
you're using the standard code style
- `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass
- `cargo run -- -c "use std testing; testing run-tests --path
crates/nu-std"` to run the tests for the standard library
> **Note**
> from `nushell` you can also use the `toolkit` as follows
> ```bash
> use toolkit.nu # or use an `env_change` hook to activate it
automatically
> toolkit check pr
> ```
-->
# After Submitting
<!-- If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the
documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the
PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date.
-->
# Description
Those two commands are very complementary to `into duration` and `into
filesize` when you want to coerce a particular string output.
This keeps the old `format` command with its separate formatting syntax
still in `nu-cmd-extra`.
# User-Facing Changes
`format filesize` is back accessible with the default build. The new
`format duration` command is also available to everybody
# Tests + Formatting
<!--
if this PR closes one or more issues, you can automatically link the PR
with
them by using one of the [*linking
keywords*](https://docs.github.com/en/issues/tracking-your-work-with-issues/linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue#linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue-using-a-keyword),
e.g.
- this PR should close #xxxx
- fixes #xxxx
-->
# Description
This PR implements the workaround discussed in #9795, i.e. having
`parse` collect an external stream before operating on it with a regex.
- Should close#9795
# User-Facing Changes
<!-- List of all changes that impact the user experience here. This
helps us keep track of breaking changes. -->
- `parse` will give the correct output for external streams
- increased memory and time overhead due to collecting the entire stream
(no short-circuiting)
# Tests + Formatting
<!--
Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes.
Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands:
- `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo
fmt --all` applies these changes)
- `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used -A
clippy::needless_collect -A clippy::result_large_err` to check that
you're using the standard code style
- `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass
- `cargo run -- -c "use std testing; testing run-tests --path
crates/nu-std"` to run the tests for the standard library
> **Note**
> from `nushell` you can also use the `toolkit` as follows
> ```bash
> use toolkit.nu # or use an `env_change` hook to activate it
automatically
> toolkit check pr
> ```
-->
- formatting is checked
- clippy is happy
- no tests that weren't already broken fail
- added test case
# After Submitting
<!-- If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the
documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the
PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date.
-->
In an effort to go through and review all of the remaining commands to
find anything else that could possibly
be moved to *nu-cmd-extra*
I noticed that there are still some commands that have not been
categorized...
I am going to *Categorize* the remaining commands that still *do not
have Category homes*
In PR land I will call this *Categorification* as a play off of
*Cratification*
* str substring
* str trim
* str upcase
were in the *default* category because for some reason they had not yet
been categorized.
I went ahead and moved them to the
```rust
.category(Category::Strings)
```
I am moving the following str case commands to nu-cmd-extra (as
discussed in the core team meeting the other day)
* camel-case
* kebab-case
* pascal-case
* screaming-snake-case
* snake-case
* title-case
<!--
if this PR closes one or more issues, you can automatically link the PR
with
them by using one of the [*linking
keywords*](https://docs.github.com/en/issues/tracking-your-work-with-issues/linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue#linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue-using-a-keyword),
e.g.
- this PR should close #issue
you can also mention related issues, PRs or discussions!
-->
# Description
<!--
Thank you for improving Nushell. Please, check our [contributing
guide](../CONTRIBUTING.md) and talk to the core team before making major
changes.
Description of your pull request goes here. **Provide examples and/or
screenshots** if your changes affect the user experience.
-->
Currently `parse` acts like a `.filter` over an iterator, except that it
emits `None` for elements that can't be parsed. This causes consumers of
the adapted iterator to stop iterating too early. The correct behaviour
is to keep pulling the inner iterator until either the end of it is
reached or an element can be parsed.
- this PR should close#9906
# User-Facing Changes
<!-- List of all changes that impact the user experience here. This
helps us keep track of breaking changes. -->
List streams won't be truncated anymore after the first parse failure.
# Tests + Formatting
<!--
Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes.
Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands:
- [x] `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting
(`cargo fmt --all` applies these changes)
- [x] `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used -A
clippy::needless_collect -A clippy::result_large_err` to check that
you're using the standard code style
- [-] `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass
- `cargo run -- -c "use std testing; testing run-tests --path
crates/nu-std"` to run the tests for the standard library
> **Note**
> from `nushell` you can also use the `toolkit` as follows
> ```bash
> use toolkit.nu # or use an `env_change` hook to activate it
automatically
> toolkit check pr
> ```
-->
- [x] `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting
(`cargo fmt --all` applies these changes)
- [x] `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used -A
clippy::needless_collect -A clippy::result_large_err` to check that
you're using the standard code style
- [x] `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass
- 11 tests fail, but the same 11 tests fail on main as well
- [x] `cargo run -- -c "use std testing; testing run-tests --path
crates/nu-std"` to run the tests for the standard library
# After Submitting
<!-- If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the
documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the
PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date.
-->
# Description
Closes: #9891
I also think it's good to keep command name consistency.
And moving `date format` to deprecated.
# User-Facing Changes
Running `date format` will lead to deprecate message:
```nushell
❯ "2021-10-22 20:00:12 +01:00" | date format
Error: nu:🐚:deprecated_command
× Deprecated command date format
╭─[entry #28:1:1]
1 │ "2021-10-22 20:00:12 +01:00" | date format
· ─────┬─────
· ╰── 'date format' is deprecated. Please use 'format date' instead.
╰────
```
# Description
This PR updates the `char` command to allow `Table` output due to the
`--list` parameter.
### Before
```nushell
char --list | transpose
Error: nu::parser::input_type_mismatch
× Command does not support string input.
╭─[entry #6:1:1]
1 │ char --list | transpose
· ────┬────
· ╰── command doesn't support string input
╰────
```
### After
```nushell
❯ char --list | transpose
╭───┬───────────┬─────────┬─────────┬─────────┬───────────┬─────────┬─────────────┬─────────┬─────────┬─────────┬──────────┬──────────┬──────────┬────────────┬──────────┬─────────────┬──────────┬────────────┬──────────┬──────────┬─────╮
│ # │ column0 │ column1 │ column2 │ column3 │ column4 │ column5 │ column6 │ column7 │ column8 │ column9 │ column10 │ column11 │ column12 │ column13 │ column14 │ column15 │ column16 │ column17 │ column18 │ column19 │ ... │
├───┼───────────┼─────────┼─────────┼─────────┼───────────┼─────────┼─────────────┼─────────┼─────────┼─────────┼──────────┼──────────┼──────────┼────────────┼──────────┼─────────────┼──────────┼────────────┼──────────┼──────────┼─────┤
│ 0 │ name │ newline │ enter │ nl │ line_feed │ lf │ carriage_re │ cr │ crlf │ tab │ sp │ space │ pipe │ left_brace │ lbrace │ right_brace │ rbrace │ left_paren │ lp │ lparen │ ... │
│ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ turn │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │
│ 1 │ character │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ | │ { │ { │ } │ } │ ( │ ( │ ( │ ... │
│ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │
│ 2 │ unicode │ a │ a │ a │ a │ a │ d │ d │ d a │ 9 │ 20 │ 20 │ 7c │ 7b │ 7b │ 7d │ 7d │ 28 │ 28 │ 28 │ ... │
╰───┴───────────┴─────────┴─────────┴─────────┴───────────┴─────────┴─────────────┴─────────┴─────────┴─────────┴──────────┴──────────┴──────────┴────────────┴──────────┴─────────────┴──────────┴────────────┴──────────┴──────────┴─────╯
```
# User-Facing Changes
<!-- List of all changes that impact the user experience here. This
helps us keep track of breaking changes. -->
# Tests + Formatting
<!--
Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes.
Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands:
- `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo
fmt --all` applies these changes)
- `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used -A
clippy::needless_collect -A clippy::result_large_err` to check that
you're using the standard code style
- `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass
- `cargo run -- -c "use std testing; testing run-tests --path
crates/nu-std"` to run the tests for the standard library
> **Note**
> from `nushell` you can also use the `toolkit` as follows
> ```bash
> use toolkit.nu # or use an `env_change` hook to activate it
automatically
> toolkit check pr
> ```
-->
# After Submitting
<!-- If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the
documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the
PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date.
-->
# Description
`Span` is `Copy`, so we probably should not be passing references of
`Span` around. This PR replaces all instances of `&Span` with `Span`,
copying spans where necessary.
# User-Facing Changes
This alters some public functions to take `Span` instead of `&Span` as
input. Namely, `EngineState::get_span_contents`,
`nu_protocol::extract_value`, a bunch of the math commands, and
`Gstat::gstat`.
# Description
This command also flat-maps and doesn't create a table like `split
column`
We should probably reconsider the flatmap behavior like in #9739
but for the #9812 hotfix this is an unwelcome breaking change.
# User-Facing Changes
None
# Tests + Formatting
- Fix signature of `split row`
- Add test for output signature
# Description
With the current typechecking logic this property has no effect.
It was only used in the example testing, and provided some indication of
this vectorizing property.
With #9742 all commands that previously declared it have explicit list
signatures. If we want to get it back in the future we can reconstruct
it from the signature.
Simplifies the example testing a bit.
# User-Facing Changes
Causes a breaking change for plugins that previously declared it. While
this causes a compile fail, this was already broken by our more
stringent type checking.
This will be a good reminder for plugin authors to update their
signature as well to reflect the more stringent type checking.
# Description
The same procedure as for #9778 repeated for records.
# User-Facing Changes
Commands that directly supported applying their work directly to record
fields via cell paths, that worked before #9680 will now work again
# Tests + Formatting
Tried to limit the need to add new `.allow_variants_without_examples()`
by adjusting or adding tests to also use some records with access.
# Description
Reallow the commands that take cellpaths as rest parameters to operate
on table input data.
Went through all commands returned by
```
scope commands |
filter { |cmd| $cmd.signatures |
values |
any {|sig| $sig |
any {|$sig| $sig.parameter_type == rest and $sig.syntax_shape ==
cellpath }
}
} | get name
```
Only exception to that was `is-empty` that returns a bool.
# User-Facing Changes
Same table operations as in `0.82` should still be possible
Mitigates effects of #9680
# Description
Those two commands did *not* vectorize over the input in the pure sense
as they performed a flat map. Now they return a list for each string
that gets split by them.
```
["foo" "bar"] | split chars
```
## Before
```
╭───┬───╮
│ 0 │ f │
│ 1 │ o │
│ 2 │ o │
│ 3 │ b │
│ 4 │ a │
│ 5 │ r │
╰───┴───╯
```
## After
```
╭───┬───────────╮
│ 0 │ ╭───┬───╮ │
│ │ │ 0 │ f │ │
│ │ │ 1 │ o │ │
│ │ │ 2 │ o │ │
│ │ ╰───┴───╯ │
│ 1 │ ╭───┬───╮ │
│ │ │ 0 │ b │ │
│ │ │ 1 │ a │ │
│ │ │ 2 │ r │ │
│ │ ╰───┴───╯ │
╰───┴───────────╯
```
# Description
All commands that declared `.vectorizes_over_list(true)` now also
explicitly declare the list form of their scalar types.
- Explicit in/out list signatures for nu-command
- Explicit in/out list signatures for nu-cmd-extra
- Add comments about cellpath behavior that is still unresolved
# User-Facing Changes
Our type signatures will now be more explicit about which commands
support vectorization over lists.
On the downside this is a bit more verbose and less systematic.
