Commit graph

3 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Antoine Stevan
1ed645c6c2
feature: add the standard library tests to the PR template and the toolkit (#8629)
Related to #8525.

# Description
With #8525, the tests for the standard library have been enabled in the
CI.
The only places where these tests are missing are
- the PR template
- the toolkit

This PR adds
- `cargo run -- crates/nu-utils/standard_library/tests.nu` to the PR
template
- the same command as `toolkit test stdlib`
- the `test stdlib` command to `toolkit check pr`

# User-Facing Changes
```
$nothing
```

# Tests + Formatting
the new output of `toolkit check pr`, with the same color code:
> - 🟢 `toolkit fmt`
> - 🟢 `toolkit clippy`
> - 🟢 `toolkit test`
> - 🟢 `toolkit test stdlib`

# After Submitting
```
$nothing
```
2023-03-30 19:25:42 +02:00
Antoine Stevan
c66bd5e809
FEATURE: add a pretty output to toolkit check pr (#8416)
when i write a PR, i run the tests and i like to have a pretty output to
make extra clear which one of the tests did run, which one did not, etc,
etc...

this always end up a variation of the template
> - `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting
(`cargo fmt --all` applies these changes)
> - `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used -A
clippy::needless_collect` to check that you're using the standard code
style
> - `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass

but with emojis and without the descriptions

> - 🟢 `cargo fmt --all`
> - 🔴 `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D
clippy::unwrap_used -A clippy::needless_collect`
> - 🟡 `cargo test --workspace`
>
> and a  (``) when i did not have the time
or the resources to run the check stage

in this PR, i came up with a way to do that automatically with the
`toolkit` introduced in #8152 😋

# Description
this PR
- adds `toolkit::pretty-print-command` to print the command names being
run with backticks and some colors
- adds `toolkit::report` to return a "report" of the PR check stages =>
see `help toolkit check pr`
- adds the `--pretty` option to `toolkit check pr` to return a
list-with-emojis version of the check report, i.e. a *GitHub*-friendly
list to drop in place in the "Tests + Formatting" section
- adds a clear mention to `toolkit check pr --pretty` in the PR template
to make it easily visible to anyone

hope you'll like it, that's not a huge deal but that's my attempt to
encourage developers to show that they run the tests, what stages did
pass and which one did not 😌 👋

# User-Facing Changes
the developer can now use `toolkit check pr --pretty` to have a
ready-to-use output for *GitHub*

# Tests + Formatting
```
$nothing
```

# After Submitting
```
$nothing
```
2023-03-18 07:58:21 -05:00
Antoine Stevan
7e82f8d9b5
FEATURE: wrap the dev instructions from the PR template for easier use (#8152)
i was writing #8148 and came to the "_Test + Formatting_" section of the
PR template.
i felt the developer instructions could be wrapped up in a common easy
to use format, e.g. a `Makefile`, to be used with a few-words command
only, e.g. `make fmt` or `make clippy`, instead of the long commands in
the PR template 🤔

> **Note**
> in case you guys do not want to add a `Makefile` to the `nushell`
source, that PR can be discarded 😌

# Description
this PR
- adds the few rules from the PR template to a new `Makefile`
- replaces the instructions in the PR template from the full commands to
the new `make` rules

# User-Facing Changes
- _none for the regular user_
- i believe easier to test PRs for the developer, allowing one not to
realy on knowing the long commands or using the shell history to run
them again 😋

# Tests + Formatting
_nothing to test_

# After Submitting
maybe mention that in `CONTRIBUTING.md`?
2023-03-11 12:10:32 -06:00