Commit graph

9 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
JT
aded2c1937
Refactor to support multiple parse errors (#8765)
# Description

This is a pretty heavy refactor of the parser to support multiple parser
errors. It has a few issues we should address before landing:

- [x] In some cases, error quality has gotten worse `1 / "bob"` for
example
- [x] if/else isn't currently parsing correctly
- probably others

# User-Facing Changes

This may have error quality degradation as we adjust to the new error
reporting mechanism.

# Tests + Formatting

Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes.

Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands:

- `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo
fmt --all` applies these changes)
- `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used -A
clippy::needless_collect` to check that you're using the standard code
style
- `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass
- `cargo run -- crates/nu-utils/standard_library/tests.nu` to run the
tests for the standard library

> **Note**
> from `nushell` you can also use the `toolkit` as follows
> ```bash
> use toolkit.nu # or use an `env_change` hook to activate it
automatically
> toolkit check pr
> ```

# After Submitting

If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the
documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the
PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date.
2023-04-07 12:35:45 +12:00
mike
8cf9bc9993
allow lists to have type annotations (#8529)
this pr refines #8270 and closes #8109

# description
examples:

the original syntax is okay
```nu
def okay [nums: list] {}         # the type of list will be list<any>
```

empty annotations are allowed in any variation
the last two may be caught by a future formatter, 
but do not affect `nu` code currently
```nu
def okay [nums: list<>] {}       # okay

def okay [nums: list<     >] {}  # weird but also okay

def okay [nums: list<
>] {}                            # also weird but okay
```

types are allowed (See [notes](#notes) below)
```nu
def okay [nums: list<int>] {}    # `test [a b c]` will throw an error 

def okay [nums: list< int > {}   # any amount of space within the angle brackets is okay

def err [nums: list <int>] {}    # this is not okay, `nums` and `<int>` will be parsed as
                                 # two separate params, 
```

nested annotations are allowed in many variations
```nu
def okay [items: list<list<int>>] {}

def okay [items: list<list>] {}
```

any unterminated annotation is caught
```nu
Error: nu::parser::unexpected_eof

  × Unexpected end of code.
   ╭─[source:1:1]
 1 │ def err [nums: list<int] {}
   ·                       ▲
   ·                       ╰── expected closing >
   ╰────
```

unknown types are flagged
```nu
Error: nu::parser::unknown_type

  × Unknown type.
   ╭─[source:1:1]
 1 │ def err [nums: list<str>] {}
   ·                     ─┬─
   ·                      ╰── unknown type
   ╰────

Error: nu::parser::unknown_type

  × Unknown type.
   ╭─[source:1:1]
 1 │ def err [nums: list<int, string>] {}
   ·                    ─────┬─────
   ·                          ╰── unknown type
   ╰────
```

# notes
the error message for mismatched types in not as intuitive
```nu
Error: nu::parser::parse_mismatch

  × Parse mismatch during operation.
   ╭─[source:1:1]
 1 │ def err [nums: list<int>] {}; err [a b c]
   ·                                    ┬
   ·                                    ╰── expected int
   ╰────
```
it should be something like this
```nu
Error: nu::parser::parse_mismatch

  × Parse mismatch during operation.
   ╭─[source:1:1]
 1 │ def err [nums: list<int>] {}; err [a b c]
   ·                                    ──┬──
   ·                                      ╰── expected list<int>
   ╰────
```
this is currently not implemented
2023-03-24 12:54:06 +01:00
Mango The Fourth
d0e0701a88
fix: fix lexing of comments, such that a#b becomes a coherent Item (#8151)
# Description

Previously `nix run nixpkgs#hello` was lexed as `Item, Item, Item,
Comment`, however, `#hello` is *not* supposed to be a comment here and
should be parsed as part of the third `Item`.

This change introduces this behavior by not interrupting the parse of
the current token upon seeing a `#`.

Thank you so much for considering this, I think many `nix` users will be
grateful for this change and I think this will lead to more adaptation
in the ecosystem.

- closes #8137 and #6335 

# User-Facing Changes

- code like `somecode# bla` and `somecode#bla` will not be parsed as
`somecode, comment` but as `somecode#bla`, hence this is a breaking
change for all users who didn't put a space before a comment introducing
token (`#`)

# Tests + Formatting

I've added tests that cover this behavior in `test_lex.rs`

- [x] `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting
(`cargo fmt --all` applies these changes)
- [x] `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used -A
clippy::needless_collect` to check that you're using the standard code
style
- [x] `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass

# After Submitting

> If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the
documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the
PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date.

I think this is expected behavior in most other shells, so the
documentation was lacking for not documenting the unexpected behavior
before and hence now is automatically more complete >D
2023-02-22 12:59:47 +00:00
Daniel Buch Hansen
850ecf648a
Protocol: debug_assert!() Span to reflect a valid slice (#6806)
Also enforce this by #[non_exhaustive] span such that going forward we
cannot, in debug builds (1), construct invalid spans.

The motivation for this stems from #6431 where I've seen crashes due to
invalid slice indexing.

My hope is this will mitigate such senarios

1. https://github.com/nushell/nushell/pull/6431#issuecomment-1278147241

# Description

(description of your pull request here)

# Tests

Make sure you've done the following:

- [ ] Add tests that cover your changes, either in the command examples,
the crate/tests folder, or in the /tests folder.
- [ ] Try to think about corner cases and various ways how your changes
could break. Cover them with tests.
- [ ] If adding tests is not possible, please document in the PR body a
minimal example with steps on how to reproduce so one can verify your
change works.

Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands:

- [x] `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting
(`cargo fmt --all` applies these changes)
- [ ] `cargo clippy --workspace --features=extra -- -D warnings -D
clippy::unwrap_used -A clippy::needless_collect` to check that you're
using the standard code style
- [ ] `cargo test --workspace --features=extra` to check that all the
tests pass

# Documentation

- [ ] If your PR touches a user-facing nushell feature then make sure
that there is an entry in the documentation
(https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) for the feature, and
update it if necessary.
2022-12-03 11:44:12 +02:00
JT
143855b662
Add better comment skipping (#359) 2021-11-22 07:13:09 +13:00
JT
bc3f820227
Merge pull request #10 from jntrnr/value_streams_in_value
Value streams in value
2021-09-03 15:49:27 +12:00
JT
3d252a9797 Add nu-protocol 2021-09-02 13:29:43 +12:00
Fernando Herrera
5da2ab1b7d comments with a newline dont get together 2021-08-31 20:33:41 +01:00
Fernando Herrera
b3fb106cce tests for lex and lite parser 2021-08-30 19:36:07 +01:00