nushell/crates/nu-parser/tests/test_lex.rs

139 lines
3 KiB
Rust
Raw Normal View History

2021-09-02 01:29:43 +00:00
use nu_parser::{lex, ParseError, Token, TokenContents};
use nu_protocol::Span;
2021-08-30 18:36:07 +00:00
#[test]
fn lex_basic() {
let file = b"let x = 4";
2021-11-21 18:13:09 +00:00
let output = lex(file, 0, &[], &[], true);
2021-08-30 18:36:07 +00:00
assert!(output.1.is_none());
}
#[test]
fn lex_newline() {
let file = b"let x = 300\nlet y = 500;";
2021-11-21 18:13:09 +00:00
let output = lex(file, 0, &[], &[], true);
2021-08-30 18:36:07 +00:00
assert!(output.0.contains(&Token {
contents: TokenContents::Eol,
Protocol: debug_assert!() Span to reflect a valid slice (#6806) Also enforce this by #[non_exhaustive] span such that going forward we cannot, in debug builds (1), construct invalid spans. The motivation for this stems from #6431 where I've seen crashes due to invalid slice indexing. My hope is this will mitigate such senarios 1. https://github.com/nushell/nushell/pull/6431#issuecomment-1278147241 # Description (description of your pull request here) # Tests Make sure you've done the following: - [ ] Add tests that cover your changes, either in the command examples, the crate/tests folder, or in the /tests folder. - [ ] Try to think about corner cases and various ways how your changes could break. Cover them with tests. - [ ] If adding tests is not possible, please document in the PR body a minimal example with steps on how to reproduce so one can verify your change works. Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands: - [x] `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo fmt --all` applies these changes) - [ ] `cargo clippy --workspace --features=extra -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used -A clippy::needless_collect` to check that you're using the standard code style - [ ] `cargo test --workspace --features=extra` to check that all the tests pass # Documentation - [ ] If your PR touches a user-facing nushell feature then make sure that there is an entry in the documentation (https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) for the feature, and update it if necessary.
2022-12-03 09:44:12 +00:00
span: Span::new(11, 12)
2021-08-30 18:36:07 +00:00
}));
}
#[test]
fn lex_empty() {
let file = b"";
2021-11-21 18:13:09 +00:00
let output = lex(file, 0, &[], &[], true);
2021-08-30 18:36:07 +00:00
assert!(output.0.is_empty());
assert!(output.1.is_none());
}
#[test]
fn lex_parenthesis() {
// The whole parenthesis is an item for the lexer
let file = b"let x = (300 + (322 * 444));";
2021-11-21 18:13:09 +00:00
let output = lex(file, 0, &[], &[], true);
2021-08-30 18:36:07 +00:00
assert_eq!(
output.0.get(3).unwrap(),
&Token {
contents: TokenContents::Item,
Protocol: debug_assert!() Span to reflect a valid slice (#6806) Also enforce this by #[non_exhaustive] span such that going forward we cannot, in debug builds (1), construct invalid spans. The motivation for this stems from #6431 where I've seen crashes due to invalid slice indexing. My hope is this will mitigate such senarios 1. https://github.com/nushell/nushell/pull/6431#issuecomment-1278147241 # Description (description of your pull request here) # Tests Make sure you've done the following: - [ ] Add tests that cover your changes, either in the command examples, the crate/tests folder, or in the /tests folder. - [ ] Try to think about corner cases and various ways how your changes could break. Cover them with tests. - [ ] If adding tests is not possible, please document in the PR body a minimal example with steps on how to reproduce so one can verify your change works. Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands: - [x] `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo fmt --all` applies these changes) - [ ] `cargo clippy --workspace --features=extra -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used -A clippy::needless_collect` to check that you're using the standard code style - [ ] `cargo test --workspace --features=extra` to check that all the tests pass # Documentation - [ ] If your PR touches a user-facing nushell feature then make sure that there is an entry in the documentation (https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) for the feature, and update it if necessary.
2022-12-03 09:44:12 +00:00
span: Span::new(8, 27)
2021-08-30 18:36:07 +00:00
}
);
}
#[test]
fn lex_comment() {
let file = b"let x = 300 # a comment \n $x + 444";
2021-11-21 18:13:09 +00:00
let output = lex(file, 0, &[], &[], false);
2021-08-30 18:36:07 +00:00
assert_eq!(
output.0.get(4).unwrap(),
&Token {
contents: TokenContents::Comment,
Protocol: debug_assert!() Span to reflect a valid slice (#6806) Also enforce this by #[non_exhaustive] span such that going forward we cannot, in debug builds (1), construct invalid spans. The motivation for this stems from #6431 where I've seen crashes due to invalid slice indexing. My hope is this will mitigate such senarios 1. https://github.com/nushell/nushell/pull/6431#issuecomment-1278147241 # Description (description of your pull request here) # Tests Make sure you've done the following: - [ ] Add tests that cover your changes, either in the command examples, the crate/tests folder, or in the /tests folder. - [ ] Try to think about corner cases and various ways how your changes could break. Cover them with tests. - [ ] If adding tests is not possible, please document in the PR body a minimal example with steps on how to reproduce so one can verify your change works. Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands: - [x] `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo fmt --all` applies these changes) - [ ] `cargo clippy --workspace --features=extra -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used -A clippy::needless_collect` to check that you're using the standard code style - [ ] `cargo test --workspace --features=extra` to check that all the tests pass # Documentation - [ ] If your PR touches a user-facing nushell feature then make sure that there is an entry in the documentation (https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) for the feature, and update it if necessary.
2022-12-03 09:44:12 +00:00
span: Span::new(12, 24)
2021-08-30 18:36:07 +00:00
}
);
}
#[test]
fn lex_is_incomplete() {
let file = b"let x = 300 | ;";
2021-11-21 18:13:09 +00:00
let output = lex(file, 0, &[], &[], true);
2021-08-30 18:36:07 +00:00
let err = output.1.unwrap();
assert!(matches!(err, ParseError::ExtraTokens(_)));
}
#[test]
fn lex_incomplete_paren() {
let file = b"let x = (300 + ( 4 + 1)";
2021-11-21 18:13:09 +00:00
let output = lex(file, 0, &[], &[], true);
2021-08-30 18:36:07 +00:00
let err = output.1.unwrap();
assert!(matches!(err, ParseError::UnexpectedEof(v, _) if v == ")"));
}
#[test]
fn lex_incomplete_quote() {
let file = b"let x = '300 + 4 + 1";
2021-11-21 18:13:09 +00:00
let output = lex(file, 0, &[], &[], true);
2021-08-30 18:36:07 +00:00
let err = output.1.unwrap();
assert!(matches!(err, ParseError::UnexpectedEof(v, _) if v == "'"));
}
#[test]
fn lex_comments() {
// Comments should keep the end of line token
// Code:
// let z = 4
// let x = 4 #comment
// let y = 1 # comment
let file = b"let z = 4 #comment \n let x = 4 # comment\n let y = 1 # comment";
2021-11-21 18:13:09 +00:00
let output = lex(file, 0, &[], &[], false);
assert_eq!(
output.0.get(4).unwrap(),
&Token {
contents: TokenContents::Comment,
Protocol: debug_assert!() Span to reflect a valid slice (#6806) Also enforce this by #[non_exhaustive] span such that going forward we cannot, in debug builds (1), construct invalid spans. The motivation for this stems from #6431 where I've seen crashes due to invalid slice indexing. My hope is this will mitigate such senarios 1. https://github.com/nushell/nushell/pull/6431#issuecomment-1278147241 # Description (description of your pull request here) # Tests Make sure you've done the following: - [ ] Add tests that cover your changes, either in the command examples, the crate/tests folder, or in the /tests folder. - [ ] Try to think about corner cases and various ways how your changes could break. Cover them with tests. - [ ] If adding tests is not possible, please document in the PR body a minimal example with steps on how to reproduce so one can verify your change works. Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands: - [x] `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo fmt --all` applies these changes) - [ ] `cargo clippy --workspace --features=extra -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used -A clippy::needless_collect` to check that you're using the standard code style - [ ] `cargo test --workspace --features=extra` to check that all the tests pass # Documentation - [ ] If your PR touches a user-facing nushell feature then make sure that there is an entry in the documentation (https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) for the feature, and update it if necessary.
2022-12-03 09:44:12 +00:00
span: Span::new(10, 19)
}
);
assert_eq!(
output.0.get(5).unwrap(),
&Token {
contents: TokenContents::Eol,
Protocol: debug_assert!() Span to reflect a valid slice (#6806) Also enforce this by #[non_exhaustive] span such that going forward we cannot, in debug builds (1), construct invalid spans. The motivation for this stems from #6431 where I've seen crashes due to invalid slice indexing. My hope is this will mitigate such senarios 1. https://github.com/nushell/nushell/pull/6431#issuecomment-1278147241 # Description (description of your pull request here) # Tests Make sure you've done the following: - [ ] Add tests that cover your changes, either in the command examples, the crate/tests folder, or in the /tests folder. - [ ] Try to think about corner cases and various ways how your changes could break. Cover them with tests. - [ ] If adding tests is not possible, please document in the PR body a minimal example with steps on how to reproduce so one can verify your change works. Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands: - [x] `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo fmt --all` applies these changes) - [ ] `cargo clippy --workspace --features=extra -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used -A clippy::needless_collect` to check that you're using the standard code style - [ ] `cargo test --workspace --features=extra` to check that all the tests pass # Documentation - [ ] If your PR touches a user-facing nushell feature then make sure that there is an entry in the documentation (https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) for the feature, and update it if necessary.
2022-12-03 09:44:12 +00:00
span: Span::new(19, 20)
}
);
// When there is no space between the comment and the new line the span
// for the command and the EOL overlaps
assert_eq!(
output.0.get(10).unwrap(),
&Token {
contents: TokenContents::Comment,
Protocol: debug_assert!() Span to reflect a valid slice (#6806) Also enforce this by #[non_exhaustive] span such that going forward we cannot, in debug builds (1), construct invalid spans. The motivation for this stems from #6431 where I've seen crashes due to invalid slice indexing. My hope is this will mitigate such senarios 1. https://github.com/nushell/nushell/pull/6431#issuecomment-1278147241 # Description (description of your pull request here) # Tests Make sure you've done the following: - [ ] Add tests that cover your changes, either in the command examples, the crate/tests folder, or in the /tests folder. - [ ] Try to think about corner cases and various ways how your changes could break. Cover them with tests. - [ ] If adding tests is not possible, please document in the PR body a minimal example with steps on how to reproduce so one can verify your change works. Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands: - [x] `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo fmt --all` applies these changes) - [ ] `cargo clippy --workspace --features=extra -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used -A clippy::needless_collect` to check that you're using the standard code style - [ ] `cargo test --workspace --features=extra` to check that all the tests pass # Documentation - [ ] If your PR touches a user-facing nushell feature then make sure that there is an entry in the documentation (https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) for the feature, and update it if necessary.
2022-12-03 09:44:12 +00:00
span: Span::new(31, 40)
}
);
assert_eq!(
output.0.get(11).unwrap(),
&Token {
contents: TokenContents::Eol,
Protocol: debug_assert!() Span to reflect a valid slice (#6806) Also enforce this by #[non_exhaustive] span such that going forward we cannot, in debug builds (1), construct invalid spans. The motivation for this stems from #6431 where I've seen crashes due to invalid slice indexing. My hope is this will mitigate such senarios 1. https://github.com/nushell/nushell/pull/6431#issuecomment-1278147241 # Description (description of your pull request here) # Tests Make sure you've done the following: - [ ] Add tests that cover your changes, either in the command examples, the crate/tests folder, or in the /tests folder. - [ ] Try to think about corner cases and various ways how your changes could break. Cover them with tests. - [ ] If adding tests is not possible, please document in the PR body a minimal example with steps on how to reproduce so one can verify your change works. Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands: - [x] `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo fmt --all` applies these changes) - [ ] `cargo clippy --workspace --features=extra -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used -A clippy::needless_collect` to check that you're using the standard code style - [ ] `cargo test --workspace --features=extra` to check that all the tests pass # Documentation - [ ] If your PR touches a user-facing nushell feature then make sure that there is an entry in the documentation (https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) for the feature, and update it if necessary.
2022-12-03 09:44:12 +00:00
span: Span::new(40, 41)
}
);
}