nushell/tests/repl/test_cell_path.rs

157 lines
4 KiB
Rust
Raw Normal View History

use crate::repl::tests::{fail_test, run_test, TestResult};
2022-12-21 22:54:39 +00:00
// Tests for null / null / Value::Nothing
2022-12-21 22:54:39 +00:00
#[test]
fn nothing_fails_string() -> TestResult {
fail_test("let nil = null; $nil.foo", "doesn't support cell paths")
2022-12-21 22:54:39 +00:00
}
#[test]
fn nothing_fails_int() -> TestResult {
fail_test("let nil = null; $nil.3", "doesn't support cell paths")
2022-12-21 22:54:39 +00:00
}
// Tests for records
#[test]
fn record_single_field_success() -> TestResult {
run_test("{foo: 'bar'}.foo == 'bar'", "true")
}
Optional members in cell paths: Attempt 2 (#8379) This is a follow up from https://github.com/nushell/nushell/pull/7540. Please provide feedback if you have the time! ## Summary This PR lets you use `?` to indicate that a member in a cell path is optional and Nushell should return `null` if that member cannot be accessed. Unlike the previous PR, `?` is now a _postfix_ modifier for cell path members. A cell path of `.foo?.bar` means that `foo` is optional and `bar` is not. `?` does _not_ suppress all errors; it is intended to help in situations where data has "holes", i.e. the data types are correct but something is missing. Type mismatches (like trying to do a string path access on a date) will still fail. ### Record Examples ```bash { foo: 123 }.foo # returns 123 { foo: 123 }.bar # errors { foo: 123 }.bar? # returns null { foo: 123 } | get bar # errors { foo: 123 } | get bar? # returns null { foo: 123 }.bar.baz # errors { foo: 123 }.bar?.baz # errors because `baz` is not present on the result from `bar?` { foo: 123 }.bar.baz? # errors { foo: 123 }.bar?.baz? # returns null ``` ### List Examples ``` 〉[{foo: 1} {foo: 2} {}].foo Error: nu::shell::column_not_found × Cannot find column ╭─[entry #30:1:1] 1 │ [{foo: 1} {foo: 2} {}].foo · ─┬ ─┬─ · │ ╰── cannot find column 'foo' · ╰── value originates here ╰──── 〉[{foo: 1} {foo: 2} {}].foo? ╭───┬───╮ │ 0 │ 1 │ │ 1 │ 2 │ │ 2 │ │ ╰───┴───╯ 〉[{foo: 1} {foo: 2} {}].foo?.2 | describe nothing 〉[a b c].4? | describe nothing 〉[{foo: 1} {foo: 2} {}] | where foo? == 1 ╭───┬─────╮ │ # │ foo │ ├───┼─────┤ │ 0 │ 1 │ ╰───┴─────╯ ``` # Breaking changes 1. Column names with `?` in them now need to be quoted. 2. The `-i`/`--ignore-errors` flag has been removed from `get` and `select` 1. After this PR, most `get` error handling can be done with `?` and/or `try`/`catch`. 4. Cell path accesses like this no longer work without a `?`: ```bash 〉[{a:1 b:2} {a:3}].b.0 2 ``` We had some clever code that was able to recognize that since we only want row `0`, it's OK if other rows are missing column `b`. I removed that because it's tricky to maintain, and now that query needs to be written like: ```bash 〉[{a:1 b:2} {a:3}].b?.0 2 ``` I think the regression is acceptable for now. I plan to do more work in the future to enable streaming of cell path accesses, and when that happens I'll be able to make `.b.0` work again.
2023-03-16 03:50:58 +00:00
#[test]
fn record_single_field_optional_success() -> TestResult {
run_test("{foo: 'bar'}.foo? == 'bar'", "true")
}
#[test]
fn get_works_with_cell_path_success() -> TestResult {
run_test("{foo: 'bar'} | get foo?", "bar")
}
#[test]
fn get_works_with_cell_path_missing_data() -> TestResult {
run_test("{foo: 'bar'} | get foobar? | to nuon", "null")
}
2022-12-21 22:54:39 +00:00
#[test]
fn record_single_field_failure() -> TestResult {
fail_test("{foo: 'bar'}.foobar", "")
}
#[test]
fn record_int_failure() -> TestResult {
fail_test("{foo: 'bar'}.3", "")
}
Optional members in cell paths: Attempt 2 (#8379) This is a follow up from https://github.com/nushell/nushell/pull/7540. Please provide feedback if you have the time! ## Summary This PR lets you use `?` to indicate that a member in a cell path is optional and Nushell should return `null` if that member cannot be accessed. Unlike the previous PR, `?` is now a _postfix_ modifier for cell path members. A cell path of `.foo?.bar` means that `foo` is optional and `bar` is not. `?` does _not_ suppress all errors; it is intended to help in situations where data has "holes", i.e. the data types are correct but something is missing. Type mismatches (like trying to do a string path access on a date) will still fail. ### Record Examples ```bash { foo: 123 }.foo # returns 123 { foo: 123 }.bar # errors { foo: 123 }.bar? # returns null { foo: 123 } | get bar # errors { foo: 123 } | get bar? # returns null { foo: 123 }.bar.baz # errors { foo: 123 }.bar?.baz # errors because `baz` is not present on the result from `bar?` { foo: 123 }.bar.baz? # errors { foo: 123 }.bar?.baz? # returns null ``` ### List Examples ``` 〉[{foo: 1} {foo: 2} {}].foo Error: nu::shell::column_not_found × Cannot find column ╭─[entry #30:1:1] 1 │ [{foo: 1} {foo: 2} {}].foo · ─┬ ─┬─ · │ ╰── cannot find column 'foo' · ╰── value originates here ╰──── 〉[{foo: 1} {foo: 2} {}].foo? ╭───┬───╮ │ 0 │ 1 │ │ 1 │ 2 │ │ 2 │ │ ╰───┴───╯ 〉[{foo: 1} {foo: 2} {}].foo?.2 | describe nothing 〉[a b c].4? | describe nothing 〉[{foo: 1} {foo: 2} {}] | where foo? == 1 ╭───┬─────╮ │ # │ foo │ ├───┼─────┤ │ 0 │ 1 │ ╰───┴─────╯ ``` # Breaking changes 1. Column names with `?` in them now need to be quoted. 2. The `-i`/`--ignore-errors` flag has been removed from `get` and `select` 1. After this PR, most `get` error handling can be done with `?` and/or `try`/`catch`. 4. Cell path accesses like this no longer work without a `?`: ```bash 〉[{a:1 b:2} {a:3}].b.0 2 ``` We had some clever code that was able to recognize that since we only want row `0`, it's OK if other rows are missing column `b`. I removed that because it's tricky to maintain, and now that query needs to be written like: ```bash 〉[{a:1 b:2} {a:3}].b?.0 2 ``` I think the regression is acceptable for now. I plan to do more work in the future to enable streaming of cell path accesses, and when that happens I'll be able to make `.b.0` work again.
2023-03-16 03:50:58 +00:00
#[test]
fn record_single_field_optional() -> TestResult {
run_test("{foo: 'bar'}.foobar? | to nuon", "null")
}
#[test]
fn record_single_field_optional_short_circuits() -> TestResult {
// Check that we return null as soon as the `.foobar?` access
// fails instead of erroring on the `.baz` access
run_test("{foo: 'bar'}.foobar?.baz | to nuon", "null")
Optional members in cell paths: Attempt 2 (#8379) This is a follow up from https://github.com/nushell/nushell/pull/7540. Please provide feedback if you have the time! ## Summary This PR lets you use `?` to indicate that a member in a cell path is optional and Nushell should return `null` if that member cannot be accessed. Unlike the previous PR, `?` is now a _postfix_ modifier for cell path members. A cell path of `.foo?.bar` means that `foo` is optional and `bar` is not. `?` does _not_ suppress all errors; it is intended to help in situations where data has "holes", i.e. the data types are correct but something is missing. Type mismatches (like trying to do a string path access on a date) will still fail. ### Record Examples ```bash { foo: 123 }.foo # returns 123 { foo: 123 }.bar # errors { foo: 123 }.bar? # returns null { foo: 123 } | get bar # errors { foo: 123 } | get bar? # returns null { foo: 123 }.bar.baz # errors { foo: 123 }.bar?.baz # errors because `baz` is not present on the result from `bar?` { foo: 123 }.bar.baz? # errors { foo: 123 }.bar?.baz? # returns null ``` ### List Examples ``` 〉[{foo: 1} {foo: 2} {}].foo Error: nu::shell::column_not_found × Cannot find column ╭─[entry #30:1:1] 1 │ [{foo: 1} {foo: 2} {}].foo · ─┬ ─┬─ · │ ╰── cannot find column 'foo' · ╰── value originates here ╰──── 〉[{foo: 1} {foo: 2} {}].foo? ╭───┬───╮ │ 0 │ 1 │ │ 1 │ 2 │ │ 2 │ │ ╰───┴───╯ 〉[{foo: 1} {foo: 2} {}].foo?.2 | describe nothing 〉[a b c].4? | describe nothing 〉[{foo: 1} {foo: 2} {}] | where foo? == 1 ╭───┬─────╮ │ # │ foo │ ├───┼─────┤ │ 0 │ 1 │ ╰───┴─────╯ ``` # Breaking changes 1. Column names with `?` in them now need to be quoted. 2. The `-i`/`--ignore-errors` flag has been removed from `get` and `select` 1. After this PR, most `get` error handling can be done with `?` and/or `try`/`catch`. 4. Cell path accesses like this no longer work without a `?`: ```bash 〉[{a:1 b:2} {a:3}].b.0 2 ``` We had some clever code that was able to recognize that since we only want row `0`, it's OK if other rows are missing column `b`. I removed that because it's tricky to maintain, and now that query needs to be written like: ```bash 〉[{a:1 b:2} {a:3}].b?.0 2 ``` I think the regression is acceptable for now. I plan to do more work in the future to enable streaming of cell path accesses, and when that happens I'll be able to make `.b.0` work again.
2023-03-16 03:50:58 +00:00
}
#[test]
fn record_multiple_optional_fields() -> TestResult {
run_test("{foo: 'bar'}.foobar?.baz? | to nuon", "null")
}
2022-12-21 22:54:39 +00:00
#[test]
fn nested_record_field_success() -> TestResult {
run_test("{foo: {bar: 'baz'} }.foo.bar == 'baz'", "true")
}
#[test]
fn nested_record_field_failure() -> TestResult {
fail_test("{foo: {bar: 'baz'} }.foo.asdf", "")
}
Optional members in cell paths: Attempt 2 (#8379) This is a follow up from https://github.com/nushell/nushell/pull/7540. Please provide feedback if you have the time! ## Summary This PR lets you use `?` to indicate that a member in a cell path is optional and Nushell should return `null` if that member cannot be accessed. Unlike the previous PR, `?` is now a _postfix_ modifier for cell path members. A cell path of `.foo?.bar` means that `foo` is optional and `bar` is not. `?` does _not_ suppress all errors; it is intended to help in situations where data has "holes", i.e. the data types are correct but something is missing. Type mismatches (like trying to do a string path access on a date) will still fail. ### Record Examples ```bash { foo: 123 }.foo # returns 123 { foo: 123 }.bar # errors { foo: 123 }.bar? # returns null { foo: 123 } | get bar # errors { foo: 123 } | get bar? # returns null { foo: 123 }.bar.baz # errors { foo: 123 }.bar?.baz # errors because `baz` is not present on the result from `bar?` { foo: 123 }.bar.baz? # errors { foo: 123 }.bar?.baz? # returns null ``` ### List Examples ``` 〉[{foo: 1} {foo: 2} {}].foo Error: nu::shell::column_not_found × Cannot find column ╭─[entry #30:1:1] 1 │ [{foo: 1} {foo: 2} {}].foo · ─┬ ─┬─ · │ ╰── cannot find column 'foo' · ╰── value originates here ╰──── 〉[{foo: 1} {foo: 2} {}].foo? ╭───┬───╮ │ 0 │ 1 │ │ 1 │ 2 │ │ 2 │ │ ╰───┴───╯ 〉[{foo: 1} {foo: 2} {}].foo?.2 | describe nothing 〉[a b c].4? | describe nothing 〉[{foo: 1} {foo: 2} {}] | where foo? == 1 ╭───┬─────╮ │ # │ foo │ ├───┼─────┤ │ 0 │ 1 │ ╰───┴─────╯ ``` # Breaking changes 1. Column names with `?` in them now need to be quoted. 2. The `-i`/`--ignore-errors` flag has been removed from `get` and `select` 1. After this PR, most `get` error handling can be done with `?` and/or `try`/`catch`. 4. Cell path accesses like this no longer work without a `?`: ```bash 〉[{a:1 b:2} {a:3}].b.0 2 ``` We had some clever code that was able to recognize that since we only want row `0`, it's OK if other rows are missing column `b`. I removed that because it's tricky to maintain, and now that query needs to be written like: ```bash 〉[{a:1 b:2} {a:3}].b?.0 2 ``` I think the regression is acceptable for now. I plan to do more work in the future to enable streaming of cell path accesses, and when that happens I'll be able to make `.b.0` work again.
2023-03-16 03:50:58 +00:00
#[test]
fn nested_record_field_optional() -> TestResult {
run_test("{foo: {bar: 'baz'} }.foo.asdf? | to nuon", "null")
}
2022-12-21 22:54:39 +00:00
#[test]
fn record_with_nested_list_success() -> TestResult {
run_test("{foo: [{bar: 'baz'}]}.foo.0.bar == 'baz'", "true")
}
#[test]
fn record_with_nested_list_int_failure() -> TestResult {
fail_test("{foo: [{bar: 'baz'}]}.foo.3.bar", "")
}
#[test]
fn record_with_nested_list_column_failure() -> TestResult {
fail_test("{foo: [{bar: 'baz'}]}.foo.0.asdf", "")
}
// Tests for lists
#[test]
fn list_single_field_success() -> TestResult {
run_test("[{foo: 'bar'}].foo.0 == 'bar'", "true")?;
// test field access both ways
run_test("[{foo: 'bar'}].0.foo == 'bar'", "true")
}
#[test]
fn list_single_field_failure() -> TestResult {
fail_test("[{foo: 'bar'}].asdf", "")
}
// Test the scenario where the requested column is not present in all rows
#[test]
Make `get` hole errors and cell path hole errors identical (improvement on #7002) (#7647) # Description This closes #7498, as well as fixes an issue reported in https://github.com/nushell/nushell/pull/7002#issuecomment-1368340773 BEFORE: ``` 〉[{foo: 'bar'} {}] | get foo Error: nu::shell::column_not_found (link) × Cannot find column ╭─[entry #5:1:1] 1 │ [{foo: 'bar'} {}] | get foo · ────────┬──────── ─┬─ · │ ╰── value originates here · ╰── cannot find column 'Empty cell' ╰──── 〉[{foo: 'bar'} {}].foo ╭───┬─────╮ │ 0 │ bar │ │ 1 │ │ ╰───┴─────╯ ``` AFTER: ``` 〉[{foo: 'bar'} {}] | get foo Error: nu::shell::column_not_found (link) × Cannot find column ╭─[entry #1:1:1] 1 │ [{foo: 'bar'} {}] | get foo · ─┬ ─┬─ · │ ╰── cannot find column 'foo' · ╰── value originates here ╰──── 〉[{foo: 'bar'} {}].foo Error: nu::shell::column_not_found (link) × Cannot find column ╭─[entry #3:1:1] 1 │ [{foo: 'bar'} {}].foo · ─┬ ─┬─ · │ ╰── cannot find column 'foo' · ╰── value originates here ╰──── ``` EDIT: This also changes the semantics of `get`/`select` `-i` somewhat. I've decided to leave it like this because it works more intuitively with `default` and `compact`. BEFORE: ``` 〉[{a:1} {b:2} {a:3}] | select -i foo | to nuon null ``` AFTER: ``` 〉[{a:1} {b:2} {a:3}] | select -i foo | to nuon [[foo]; [null], [null], [null]] ``` # User-Facing Changes See above. EDIT: the issue with holes in cases like ` [{foo: 'bar'} {}].foo.0` versus ` [{foo: 'bar'} {}].0.foo` has been resolved. # Tests + Formatting Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes. Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands: - `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo fmt --all` applies these changes) - `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used -A clippy::needless_collect` to check that you're using the standard code style - `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass # After Submitting If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date.
2023-01-02 22:45:43 +00:00
fn jagged_list_access_fails() -> TestResult {
fail_test("[{foo: 'bar'}, {}].foo", "cannot find column")?;
fail_test("[{}, {foo: 'bar'}].foo", "cannot find column")
2022-12-21 22:54:39 +00:00
}
Optional members in cell paths: Attempt 2 (#8379) This is a follow up from https://github.com/nushell/nushell/pull/7540. Please provide feedback if you have the time! ## Summary This PR lets you use `?` to indicate that a member in a cell path is optional and Nushell should return `null` if that member cannot be accessed. Unlike the previous PR, `?` is now a _postfix_ modifier for cell path members. A cell path of `.foo?.bar` means that `foo` is optional and `bar` is not. `?` does _not_ suppress all errors; it is intended to help in situations where data has "holes", i.e. the data types are correct but something is missing. Type mismatches (like trying to do a string path access on a date) will still fail. ### Record Examples ```bash { foo: 123 }.foo # returns 123 { foo: 123 }.bar # errors { foo: 123 }.bar? # returns null { foo: 123 } | get bar # errors { foo: 123 } | get bar? # returns null { foo: 123 }.bar.baz # errors { foo: 123 }.bar?.baz # errors because `baz` is not present on the result from `bar?` { foo: 123 }.bar.baz? # errors { foo: 123 }.bar?.baz? # returns null ``` ### List Examples ``` 〉[{foo: 1} {foo: 2} {}].foo Error: nu::shell::column_not_found × Cannot find column ╭─[entry #30:1:1] 1 │ [{foo: 1} {foo: 2} {}].foo · ─┬ ─┬─ · │ ╰── cannot find column 'foo' · ╰── value originates here ╰──── 〉[{foo: 1} {foo: 2} {}].foo? ╭───┬───╮ │ 0 │ 1 │ │ 1 │ 2 │ │ 2 │ │ ╰───┴───╯ 〉[{foo: 1} {foo: 2} {}].foo?.2 | describe nothing 〉[a b c].4? | describe nothing 〉[{foo: 1} {foo: 2} {}] | where foo? == 1 ╭───┬─────╮ │ # │ foo │ ├───┼─────┤ │ 0 │ 1 │ ╰───┴─────╯ ``` # Breaking changes 1. Column names with `?` in them now need to be quoted. 2. The `-i`/`--ignore-errors` flag has been removed from `get` and `select` 1. After this PR, most `get` error handling can be done with `?` and/or `try`/`catch`. 4. Cell path accesses like this no longer work without a `?`: ```bash 〉[{a:1 b:2} {a:3}].b.0 2 ``` We had some clever code that was able to recognize that since we only want row `0`, it's OK if other rows are missing column `b`. I removed that because it's tricky to maintain, and now that query needs to be written like: ```bash 〉[{a:1 b:2} {a:3}].b?.0 2 ``` I think the regression is acceptable for now. I plan to do more work in the future to enable streaming of cell path accesses, and when that happens I'll be able to make `.b.0` work again.
2023-03-16 03:50:58 +00:00
#[test]
fn jagged_list_optional_access_succeeds() -> TestResult {
run_test("[{foo: 'bar'}, {}].foo?.0", "bar")?;
run_test("[{foo: 'bar'}, {}].foo?.1 | to nuon", "null")?;
run_test("[{}, {foo: 'bar'}].foo?.0 | to nuon", "null")?;
run_test("[{}, {foo: 'bar'}].foo?.1", "bar")
}
2022-12-21 22:54:39 +00:00
// test that accessing a nonexistent row fails
#[test]
fn list_row_access_failure() -> TestResult {
fail_test("[{foo: 'bar'}, {foo: 'baz'}].2", "")
}
Optional members in cell paths: Attempt 2 (#8379) This is a follow up from https://github.com/nushell/nushell/pull/7540. Please provide feedback if you have the time! ## Summary This PR lets you use `?` to indicate that a member in a cell path is optional and Nushell should return `null` if that member cannot be accessed. Unlike the previous PR, `?` is now a _postfix_ modifier for cell path members. A cell path of `.foo?.bar` means that `foo` is optional and `bar` is not. `?` does _not_ suppress all errors; it is intended to help in situations where data has "holes", i.e. the data types are correct but something is missing. Type mismatches (like trying to do a string path access on a date) will still fail. ### Record Examples ```bash { foo: 123 }.foo # returns 123 { foo: 123 }.bar # errors { foo: 123 }.bar? # returns null { foo: 123 } | get bar # errors { foo: 123 } | get bar? # returns null { foo: 123 }.bar.baz # errors { foo: 123 }.bar?.baz # errors because `baz` is not present on the result from `bar?` { foo: 123 }.bar.baz? # errors { foo: 123 }.bar?.baz? # returns null ``` ### List Examples ``` 〉[{foo: 1} {foo: 2} {}].foo Error: nu::shell::column_not_found × Cannot find column ╭─[entry #30:1:1] 1 │ [{foo: 1} {foo: 2} {}].foo · ─┬ ─┬─ · │ ╰── cannot find column 'foo' · ╰── value originates here ╰──── 〉[{foo: 1} {foo: 2} {}].foo? ╭───┬───╮ │ 0 │ 1 │ │ 1 │ 2 │ │ 2 │ │ ╰───┴───╯ 〉[{foo: 1} {foo: 2} {}].foo?.2 | describe nothing 〉[a b c].4? | describe nothing 〉[{foo: 1} {foo: 2} {}] | where foo? == 1 ╭───┬─────╮ │ # │ foo │ ├───┼─────┤ │ 0 │ 1 │ ╰───┴─────╯ ``` # Breaking changes 1. Column names with `?` in them now need to be quoted. 2. The `-i`/`--ignore-errors` flag has been removed from `get` and `select` 1. After this PR, most `get` error handling can be done with `?` and/or `try`/`catch`. 4. Cell path accesses like this no longer work without a `?`: ```bash 〉[{a:1 b:2} {a:3}].b.0 2 ``` We had some clever code that was able to recognize that since we only want row `0`, it's OK if other rows are missing column `b`. I removed that because it's tricky to maintain, and now that query needs to be written like: ```bash 〉[{a:1 b:2} {a:3}].b?.0 2 ``` I think the regression is acceptable for now. I plan to do more work in the future to enable streaming of cell path accesses, and when that happens I'll be able to make `.b.0` work again.
2023-03-16 03:50:58 +00:00
#[test]
fn list_row_optional_access_succeeds() -> TestResult {
run_test("[{foo: 'bar'}, {foo: 'baz'}].2? | to nuon", "null")?;
run_test("[{foo: 'bar'}, {foo: 'baz'}].3? | to nuon", "null")
}
2022-12-21 22:54:39 +00:00
// regression test for an old bug
#[test]
fn do_not_delve_too_deep_in_nested_lists() -> TestResult {
Make `get` hole errors and cell path hole errors identical (improvement on #7002) (#7647) # Description This closes #7498, as well as fixes an issue reported in https://github.com/nushell/nushell/pull/7002#issuecomment-1368340773 BEFORE: ``` 〉[{foo: 'bar'} {}] | get foo Error: nu::shell::column_not_found (link) × Cannot find column ╭─[entry #5:1:1] 1 │ [{foo: 'bar'} {}] | get foo · ────────┬──────── ─┬─ · │ ╰── value originates here · ╰── cannot find column 'Empty cell' ╰──── 〉[{foo: 'bar'} {}].foo ╭───┬─────╮ │ 0 │ bar │ │ 1 │ │ ╰───┴─────╯ ``` AFTER: ``` 〉[{foo: 'bar'} {}] | get foo Error: nu::shell::column_not_found (link) × Cannot find column ╭─[entry #1:1:1] 1 │ [{foo: 'bar'} {}] | get foo · ─┬ ─┬─ · │ ╰── cannot find column 'foo' · ╰── value originates here ╰──── 〉[{foo: 'bar'} {}].foo Error: nu::shell::column_not_found (link) × Cannot find column ╭─[entry #3:1:1] 1 │ [{foo: 'bar'} {}].foo · ─┬ ─┬─ · │ ╰── cannot find column 'foo' · ╰── value originates here ╰──── ``` EDIT: This also changes the semantics of `get`/`select` `-i` somewhat. I've decided to leave it like this because it works more intuitively with `default` and `compact`. BEFORE: ``` 〉[{a:1} {b:2} {a:3}] | select -i foo | to nuon null ``` AFTER: ``` 〉[{a:1} {b:2} {a:3}] | select -i foo | to nuon [[foo]; [null], [null], [null]] ``` # User-Facing Changes See above. EDIT: the issue with holes in cases like ` [{foo: 'bar'} {}].foo.0` versus ` [{foo: 'bar'} {}].0.foo` has been resolved. # Tests + Formatting Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes. Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands: - `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo fmt --all` applies these changes) - `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used -A clippy::needless_collect` to check that you're using the standard code style - `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass # After Submitting If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date.
2023-01-02 22:45:43 +00:00
fail_test("[[{foo: bar}]].foo", "cannot find column")
2022-12-21 22:54:39 +00:00
}
#[test]
fn cell_path_literals() -> TestResult {
run_test("let cell_path = $.a.b; {a: {b: 3}} | get $cell_path", "3")
}
// Test whether cell path access short-circuits properly
#[test]
fn deeply_nested_cell_path_short_circuits() -> TestResult {
run_test(
"{foo: [{bar: 'baz'}]}.foo.3?.bar.asdfdafg.234.foobar | to nuon",
"null",
)
}
#[test]
fn cell_path_type() -> TestResult {
run_test("$.a.b | describe", "cell-path")
}