mirror of
https://github.com/leptos-rs/leptos
synced 2024-11-10 06:44:17 +00:00
fix: a more robust aria-current="page" algorithm for A (#2770)
This commit is contained in:
Tommy Yu
GitHub
parent
b3e2040ec9
commit
9f99571b28
1 changed files with 263 additions and 3 deletions
|
|
@ -79,6 +79,10 @@ pub fn A<H>(
|
|||
/// will skip this page.)
|
||||
#[prop(optional)]
|
||||
replace: bool,
|
||||
/// If `true`, and when `href` has a trailing slash, `aria-current` be only be set if `current_url` also has
|
||||
/// a trailing slash.
|
||||
#[prop(optional)]
|
||||
strict_trailing_slash: bool,
|
||||
/// The nodes or elements to be shown inside the link.
|
||||
children: Children,
|
||||
) -> impl IntoView
|
||||
|
|
@ -92,6 +96,7 @@ where
|
|||
#[allow(unused)] state: Option<State>,
|
||||
#[allow(unused)] replace: bool,
|
||||
children: Children,
|
||||
strict_trailing_slash: bool,
|
||||
) -> impl IntoView {
|
||||
let RouterContext { current_url, .. } =
|
||||
use_context().expect("tried to use <A/> outside a <Router/>.");
|
||||
|
|
@ -105,8 +110,7 @@ where
|
|||
if exact {
|
||||
loc == path
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
std::iter::zip(loc.split('/'), path.split('/'))
|
||||
.all(|(loc_p, path_p)| loc_p == path_p)
|
||||
is_active_for(path, loc, strict_trailing_slash)
|
||||
}
|
||||
})
|
||||
})
|
||||
|
|
@ -131,5 +135,261 @@ where
|
|||
}
|
||||
|
||||
let href = use_resolved_path(move || href.to_href()());
|
||||
inner(href, target, exact, state, replace, children)
|
||||
inner(
|
||||
href,
|
||||
target,
|
||||
exact,
|
||||
state,
|
||||
replace,
|
||||
children,
|
||||
strict_trailing_slash,
|
||||
)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Test if `href` is active for `location`. Assumes _both_ `href` and `location` begin with a `'/'`.
|
||||
fn is_active_for(
|
||||
href: &str,
|
||||
location: &str,
|
||||
strict_trailing_slash: bool,
|
||||
) -> bool {
|
||||
let mut href_f = href.split('/');
|
||||
// location _must_ be consumed first to avoid draining href_f early
|
||||
// also using enumerate to special case _the first two_ so that the allowance for ignoring the comparison
|
||||
// with the loc fragment on an emtpy href fragment for non root related parts.
|
||||
std::iter::zip(location.split('/'), href_f.by_ref())
|
||||
.enumerate()
|
||||
.all(|(c, (loc_p, href_p))| loc_p == href_p || href_p.is_empty() && c > 1)
|
||||
&& match href_f.next() {
|
||||
// when no href fragments remain, location is definitely somewhere nested inside href
|
||||
None => true,
|
||||
// when an outstanding href fragment is an empty string, default `strict_trailing_slash` setting will
|
||||
// have the typical expected case where href="/item/" is active for location="/item", but when toggled
|
||||
// to true it becomes inactive; please refer to test case comments for explanation.
|
||||
Some("") => !strict_trailing_slash,
|
||||
// inactive when href fragments remain (otherwise false postive for href="/item/one", location="/item")
|
||||
_ => false,
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#[cfg(test)]
|
||||
mod tests {
|
||||
use super::is_active_for;
|
||||
|
||||
#[test]
|
||||
fn is_active_for_matched() {
|
||||
[false, true].into_iter().for_each(|f| {
|
||||
// root
|
||||
assert!(is_active_for("/", "/", f));
|
||||
|
||||
// both at one level for all combinations of trailing slashes
|
||||
assert!(is_active_for("/item", "/item", f));
|
||||
// assert!(is_active_for("/item/", "/item", f));
|
||||
assert!(is_active_for("/item", "/item/", f));
|
||||
assert!(is_active_for("/item/", "/item/", f));
|
||||
|
||||
// plus sub one level for all combinations of trailing slashes
|
||||
assert!(is_active_for("/item", "/item/one", f));
|
||||
assert!(is_active_for("/item", "/item/one/", f));
|
||||
assert!(is_active_for("/item/", "/item/one", f));
|
||||
assert!(is_active_for("/item/", "/item/one/", f));
|
||||
|
||||
// both at two levels for all combinations of trailing slashes
|
||||
assert!(is_active_for("/item/1", "/item/1", f));
|
||||
// assert!(is_active_for("/item/1/", "/item/1", f));
|
||||
assert!(is_active_for("/item/1", "/item/1/", f));
|
||||
assert!(is_active_for("/item/1/", "/item/1/", f));
|
||||
|
||||
// plus sub various levels for all combinations of trailing slashes
|
||||
assert!(is_active_for("/item/1", "/item/1/two", f));
|
||||
assert!(is_active_for("/item/1", "/item/1/three/four/", f));
|
||||
assert!(is_active_for("/item/1/", "/item/1/three/four", f));
|
||||
assert!(is_active_for("/item/1/", "/item/1/two/", f));
|
||||
|
||||
// both at various levels for various trailing slashes
|
||||
assert!(is_active_for("/item/1/two/three", "/item/1/two/three", f));
|
||||
assert!(is_active_for(
|
||||
"/item/1/two/three/444",
|
||||
"/item/1/two/three/444/",
|
||||
f
|
||||
));
|
||||
// assert!(is_active_for(
|
||||
// "/item/1/two/three/444/FIVE/",
|
||||
// "/item/1/two/three/444/FIVE",
|
||||
// f
|
||||
// ));
|
||||
assert!(is_active_for(
|
||||
"/item/1/two/three/444/FIVE/final/",
|
||||
"/item/1/two/three/444/FIVE/final/",
|
||||
f
|
||||
));
|
||||
|
||||
// sub various levels for various trailing slashes
|
||||
assert!(is_active_for(
|
||||
"/item/1/two/three",
|
||||
"/item/1/two/three/three/two/1/item",
|
||||
f
|
||||
));
|
||||
assert!(is_active_for(
|
||||
"/item/1/two/three/444",
|
||||
"/item/1/two/three/444/just_one_more/",
|
||||
f
|
||||
));
|
||||
assert!(is_active_for(
|
||||
"/item/1/two/three/444/final/",
|
||||
"/item/1/two/three/444/final/just/kidding",
|
||||
f
|
||||
));
|
||||
|
||||
// edge/weird/unexpected cases?
|
||||
|
||||
// since empty fragments are not checked, these all highlight
|
||||
assert!(is_active_for(
|
||||
"/item/////",
|
||||
"/item/one/two/three/four/",
|
||||
f
|
||||
));
|
||||
assert!(is_active_for(
|
||||
"/item/////",
|
||||
"/item/1/two/three/three/two/1/item",
|
||||
f
|
||||
));
|
||||
assert!(is_active_for(
|
||||
"/item/1///three//1",
|
||||
"/item/1/two/three/three/two/1/item",
|
||||
f
|
||||
));
|
||||
|
||||
// artifact of the checking algorithm, as it assumes empty segments denote termination of sort, so
|
||||
// omission acts like a wildcard that isn't checked.
|
||||
assert!(is_active_for(
|
||||
"/item//foo",
|
||||
"/item/this_is_not_empty/foo/bar/baz",
|
||||
f
|
||||
));
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
// Refer to comment on the similar scenario on the next test case for explanation, as this assumes the
|
||||
// "typical" case where the strict trailing slash flag is unset or false.
|
||||
assert!(is_active_for("/item/", "/item", false));
|
||||
assert!(is_active_for("/item/1/", "/item/1", false));
|
||||
assert!(is_active_for(
|
||||
"/item/1/two/three/444/FIVE/",
|
||||
"/item/1/two/three/444/FIVE",
|
||||
false
|
||||
));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#[test]
|
||||
fn is_active_for_mismatched() {
|
||||
[false, true].into_iter().for_each(|f| {
|
||||
// href="/"
|
||||
assert!(!is_active_for("/", "/item", f));
|
||||
assert!(!is_active_for("/", "/somewhere/", f));
|
||||
assert!(!is_active_for("/", "/else/where", f));
|
||||
assert!(!is_active_for("/", "/no/where/", f));
|
||||
|
||||
// non root href but location at root
|
||||
assert!(!is_active_for("/somewhere", "/", f));
|
||||
assert!(!is_active_for("/somewhere/", "/", f));
|
||||
assert!(!is_active_for("/else/where", "/", f));
|
||||
assert!(!is_active_for("/no/where/", "/", f));
|
||||
|
||||
// mismatch either side all cominations of trailing slashes
|
||||
assert!(!is_active_for("/level", "/item", f));
|
||||
assert!(!is_active_for("/level", "/item/", f));
|
||||
assert!(!is_active_for("/level/", "/item", f));
|
||||
assert!(!is_active_for("/level/", "/item/", f));
|
||||
|
||||
// one level parent for all combinations of trailing slashes
|
||||
assert!(!is_active_for("/item/one", "/item", f));
|
||||
assert!(!is_active_for("/item/one/", "/item", f));
|
||||
assert!(!is_active_for("/item/one", "/item/", f));
|
||||
assert!(!is_active_for("/item/one/", "/item/", f));
|
||||
|
||||
// various parent levels for all combinations of trailing slashes
|
||||
assert!(!is_active_for("/item/1/two", "/item/1", f));
|
||||
assert!(!is_active_for("/item/1/three/four/", "/item/1", f));
|
||||
assert!(!is_active_for("/item/1/three/four", "/item/", f));
|
||||
assert!(!is_active_for("/item/1/two/", "/item/", f));
|
||||
|
||||
// sub various levels for various trailing slashes
|
||||
assert!(!is_active_for(
|
||||
"/item/1/two/three/three/two/1/item",
|
||||
"/item/1/two/three",
|
||||
f
|
||||
));
|
||||
assert!(!is_active_for(
|
||||
"/item/1/two/three/444/just_one_more/",
|
||||
"/item/1/two/three/444",
|
||||
f
|
||||
));
|
||||
assert!(!is_active_for(
|
||||
"/item/1/two/three/444/final/just/kidding",
|
||||
"/item/1/two/three/444/final/",
|
||||
f
|
||||
));
|
||||
|
||||
// edge/weird/unexpected cases?
|
||||
|
||||
// default trailing slash has the expected behavior of non-matching of any non-root location
|
||||
// this checks as if `href="/"`
|
||||
assert!(!is_active_for(
|
||||
"//////",
|
||||
"/item/1/two/three/three/two/1/item",
|
||||
f
|
||||
));
|
||||
// some weird root location?
|
||||
assert!(!is_active_for(
|
||||
"/item/1/two/three/three/two/1/item",
|
||||
"//////",
|
||||
f
|
||||
));
|
||||
|
||||
assert!(!is_active_for(
|
||||
"/item/one/two/three/four/",
|
||||
"/item/////",
|
||||
f
|
||||
));
|
||||
assert!(!is_active_for(
|
||||
"/item/one/two/three/four/",
|
||||
"/item////four/",
|
||||
f
|
||||
));
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
// The following tests enables the `strict_trailing_slash` flag, which allows the less common
|
||||
// interpretation of `/item/` being a resource with proper subitems while `/item` just simply browsing
|
||||
// the flat `item` while still currently at `/`, as the user hasn't "initiate the descent" into it
|
||||
// (e.g. a certain filesystem tried to implement a feature where a directory can be opened as a file),
|
||||
// it may be argued that when user is simply checking what `/item` is by going to that location, they
|
||||
// are still active at `/` - only by actually going into `/item/` that they are truly active there.
|
||||
//
|
||||
// In any case, the algorithm currently assumes the more "typical" case where the non-slash version is
|
||||
// an "alias" of the trailing-slash version (so aria-current is set), as "ordinarily" this is the case
|
||||
// expected by "ordinary" end-users who almost never encounter this particular scenario.
|
||||
|
||||
assert!(!is_active_for("/item/", "/item", true));
|
||||
assert!(!is_active_for("/item/1/", "/item/1", true));
|
||||
assert!(!is_active_for(
|
||||
"/item/1/two/three/444/FIVE/",
|
||||
"/item/1/two/three/444/FIVE",
|
||||
true
|
||||
));
|
||||
|
||||
// That said, in this particular scenario, the definition above should result the following be asserted
|
||||
// as true, but then it follows that every scenario may be true as the root was special cased - in
|
||||
// which case it becomes a bit meaningless?
|
||||
//
|
||||
// assert!(is_active_for("/", "/item", true));
|
||||
//
|
||||
// Perhaps there needs to be a flag such that aria-curently applies only the _same level_, e.g
|
||||
// assert!(is_same_level("/", "/"))
|
||||
// assert!(is_same_level("/", "/anything"))
|
||||
// assert!(!is_same_level("/", "/some/"))
|
||||
// assert!(!is_same_level("/", "/some/level"))
|
||||
// assert!(is_same_level("/some/", "/some/"))
|
||||
// assert!(is_same_level("/some/", "/some/level"))
|
||||
// assert!(!is_same_level("/some/", "/some/level/"))
|
||||
// assert!(!is_same_level("/some/", "/some/level/deeper"))
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Reference in a new issue