mirror of
https://github.com/inspec/inspec
synced 2024-11-10 23:24:18 +00:00
874ee77791
The existing documentation explicitly claims that not specifying “run” in a waiver is equivalent to specifying “run: false.” It turns out to be the case that the claim is completely false. This commit includes a test for a new control 18_waivered_no_expiry_default_run that behaves exactly like the control 04_waivered_no_expiry_ran_fails. That is, not specifying run in a waiver is the same as specifying “run: true.” Signed-off-by: David Marshall <dmarshall@gmail.com>
186 lines
6.7 KiB
Ruby
186 lines
6.7 KiB
Ruby
require "functional/helper"
|
|
|
|
describe "waivers" do
|
|
include FunctionalHelper
|
|
|
|
parallelize_me! # 10s -> 2s w/ N=15
|
|
|
|
let(:waivers_profiles_path) { "#{profile_path}/waivers" }
|
|
let(:run_result) { run_inspec_process(cmd, json: true) }
|
|
let(:controls_by_id) { run_result; @json.dig("profiles", 0, "controls").map { |c| [c["id"], c] }.to_h }
|
|
let(:cmd) { "exec #{waivers_profiles_path}/#{profile_name} --input-file #{waivers_profiles_path}/#{profile_name}/files/#{waiver_file}" }
|
|
|
|
attr_accessor :out
|
|
|
|
def inspec(commandline, prefix = nil)
|
|
@stdout = @stderr = nil
|
|
self.out = super
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
def stdout
|
|
@stdout ||= out.stdout
|
|
.force_encoding(Encoding::UTF_8)
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
def stderr
|
|
@stderr ||= out.stderr
|
|
.force_encoding(Encoding::UTF_8)
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
def assert_test_outcome(expected, control_id)
|
|
assert_equal expected, controls_by_id.dig(control_id, "results", 0, "status")
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
def assert_stringy(s)
|
|
assert_kind_of String, s
|
|
refute_empty s
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
def waiver_data(control_id)
|
|
controls_by_id.dig(control_id, "waiver_data")
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
def assert_waiver_annotation(control_id)
|
|
act = waiver_data control_id
|
|
|
|
# extract data from control_id
|
|
expiry = !!(control_id !~ /no_expiry/)
|
|
in_past = !!(control_id =~ /in_past/)
|
|
in_future = !!(control_id =~ /in_future/)
|
|
ran = !!(control_id !~ /not_ran/)
|
|
default_run = !!(control_id =~ /default_run/)
|
|
waiver_expired_in_past = /Waiver expired/ =~ act["message"]
|
|
|
|
# higher logic
|
|
waived = (!expiry && !ran) || (expiry && !ran && in_future)
|
|
# TODO: wasn't message was originally specced as being optional?
|
|
has_message = expiry && !ran && in_past
|
|
|
|
assert_instance_of Hash, act
|
|
|
|
assert_stringy act["justification"] # TODO: optional?
|
|
assert_equal ran, act["run"] unless default_run
|
|
assert_equal waived, act["skipped_due_to_waiver"]
|
|
assert_stringy act["message"] if has_message
|
|
# We supply a message indicating that the waiver has expired in all cases
|
|
assert_equal "", act["message"] unless has_message || waiver_expired_in_past
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
def refute_waiver_annotation(control_id)
|
|
act = waiver_data control_id
|
|
assert_instance_of Hash, act
|
|
assert_empty act
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
def assert_skip_message(yea, nay)
|
|
msg = controls_by_id.dig("01_only_if", "results", 0, "skip_message")
|
|
assert_includes msg, yea
|
|
refute_includes msg, nay
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
describe "a fully pre-slugged control file" do
|
|
let(:profile_name) { "basic" }
|
|
let(:waiver_file) { "waivers.yaml" }
|
|
|
|
# rubocop:disable Layout/AlignHash
|
|
{
|
|
"01_not_waivered_passes" => "passed",
|
|
"02_not_waivered_fails" => "failed",
|
|
"03_waivered_no_expiry_ran_passes" => "passed",
|
|
"04_waivered_no_expiry_ran_fails" => "failed",
|
|
"05_waivered_no_expiry_not_ran" => "skipped",
|
|
"06_waivered_expiry_in_past_ran_passes" => "passed",
|
|
"07_waivered_expiry_in_past_ran_fails" => "failed",
|
|
"08_waivered_expiry_in_past_not_ran" => "passed",
|
|
"09_waivered_expiry_in_future_ran_passes" => "passed",
|
|
"10_waivered_expiry_in_future_ran_fails" => "failed",
|
|
"11_waivered_expiry_in_future_not_ran" => "skipped",
|
|
"12_waivered_expiry_in_future_z_ran_passes" => "passed",
|
|
"13_waivered_expiry_in_future_z_ran_fails" => "failed",
|
|
"14_waivered_expiry_in_future_z_not_ran" => "skipped",
|
|
"15_waivered_expiry_in_future_string_ran_passes" => "passed",
|
|
"16_waivered_expiry_in_future_string_ran_fails" => "failed",
|
|
"17_waivered_expiry_in_future_string_not_ran" => "skipped",
|
|
"18_waivered_no_expiry_default_run" => "failed",
|
|
}.each do |control_id, expected|
|
|
it "has all of the expected outcomes #{control_id}" do
|
|
assert_test_outcome expected, control_id
|
|
|
|
if control_id !~ /not_waivered/
|
|
assert_waiver_annotation control_id
|
|
else
|
|
refute_waiver_annotation control_id
|
|
end
|
|
end
|
|
end
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
describe "an input and control with the same name" do
|
|
# This is a test for a regression articulated here:
|
|
# https://github.com/inspec/inspec/issues/4936
|
|
it "can execute when control namespace clashes with input" do
|
|
inspec("exec " + "#{waivers_profiles_path}/namespace-clash" + " --no-create-lockfile" + " --no-color")
|
|
|
|
_(stdout).wont_include("Control Source Code Error")
|
|
_(stdout).must_include "\nProfile Summary: 1 successful control, 0 control failures, 0 controls skipped\n"
|
|
_(stderr).must_equal ""
|
|
assert_exit_code 0, out
|
|
end
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
describe "an inherited profile" do
|
|
let(:profile_name) { "waiver-wrapper" }
|
|
let(:waiver_file) { "waivers.yaml" }
|
|
it "should set the data in the child but be empty in the wrapper" do
|
|
run_result
|
|
child_profile = @json["profiles"].detect { |p| p["name"] == "waiver-child" }
|
|
child_waiver_data = child_profile.dig("controls", 0, "waiver_data")
|
|
assert_instance_of Hash, child_waiver_data
|
|
refute_empty child_waiver_data
|
|
expected_child_waiver_data = {
|
|
"run" => false,
|
|
"justification" => "I said so",
|
|
"skipped_due_to_waiver" => true,
|
|
"message" => "",
|
|
}
|
|
assert_equal expected_child_waiver_data, child_waiver_data
|
|
|
|
wrapper_profile = @json["profiles"].detect { |p| p["name"] == "waiver-wrapper" }
|
|
wrapper_waiver_data = wrapper_profile.dig("controls", 0, "waiver_data")
|
|
assert_instance_of Hash, wrapper_waiver_data
|
|
assert_empty wrapper_waiver_data
|
|
end
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
# describe "a profile whose control ids require transformation"
|
|
|
|
describe "a waiver file with invalid dates" do
|
|
let(:profile_name) { "short" }
|
|
let(:waiver_file) { "bad-date.yaml" }
|
|
it "gracefully errors" do
|
|
result = run_result
|
|
assert_includes "ERROR", result.stdout # the error level
|
|
assert_includes "01_small", result.stdout # the offending control ID
|
|
assert_includes "never", result.stdout # The bad value
|
|
assert_equal 1, result.exit_status
|
|
end
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
describe "waivers and only_if" do
|
|
let(:profile_name) { "only_if" }
|
|
|
|
describe "when an only_if is used with no waiver" do
|
|
let(:waiver_file) { "empty.yaml" }
|
|
it "skips the control with an only_if message" do
|
|
assert_skip_message "due to only_if", "waiver"
|
|
end
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
describe "when both a skipping waiver and an only_if are present" do
|
|
let(:waiver_file) { "waiver.yaml" }
|
|
it "skips the control with a waiver message" do
|
|
assert_skip_message "waiver", "due to only_if"
|
|
end
|
|
end
|
|
end
|
|
end
|