This converts all current deprecation warnings/TODOs to use the
`Inspec.deprecate()` deprecation facility.
This also modifies `Inspec.deprecate()` to only require 1 argument.
Signed-off-by: Jerry Aldrich <jerryaldrichiii@gmail.com>
* Use fail_resource rather than skip_resource when the platform is not
supported by the resource.
* Update tests to handle failing on unsupported platforms.
Update functional tests.
Signed-off-by: Miah Johnson <miah@chia-pet.org>
* Un-deprecate plural properties on shadow; deprecate the singular versions
* Update filtertable interface to current
* A weak attempt at making the docs coherent
* Doc feedback per Jerry
Signed-off-by: Clinton Wolfe <clintoncwolfe@gmail.com>
* Add tests for method chained shadow resource with readable and
unreadable shadow files.
Ensure @params always has a safe value, otherwise we may stacktrace when
unable to read /etc/shadow and invoked with method chaining.
* Wrap deprecation notices with a proc/must_output to clean up test
output.
Added some missing newlines.
Catch deprecation notice on `lines`.
* Resolve the majority of the issues pointed out by @tbramble.
Deprecate `lines`; its really only used internally but it was 'exposed'
through tests and who knows if there is external use. `lines` is not
documented as a property at least..
`#set_params` is much better now =)
Signed-off-by: Miah Johnson <miah@chia-pet.org>
shadow file.
After much thought the deprecations from #2642 were for the wrong methods.
Plural method names feel much more natural when working with this
resource because you can have more than a single result.
Consider a match like `shadow.user(/^www/)`, this could return multiple
users, so `shadow.users` feels more natural here.
The problem is that the fields we're matching in the shadow file itself
are singular. Each entry is for a user, which has a password, and some
other fields. A user never has `passwords` in the shadow file, only a
`password`.
This is made more obvious when you use the `filter` method.
When we use this filter: `shadow.filter(min_days: 20, max_days: 30)` we
are matching fields in the shadow file and not using our matcher
methods. This means that if there is a discrepancy between our matcher
methods, and the shadow fields the user could end up confused. Like I did =)
This PR changes:
Changed matchers to match shadow fields.
Updated documentation to reflect changes.
Updated tests to reflect changes.
Re-add `filter` method, and add a test for it.
Renamed variable for FilterTable to be less confusing.
Renamed query argument for methods to be consistent.
Cleanup docs based on comments from @jerryaldrichiii
Make Rubocop happy <3
Signed-off-by: Miah Johnson <miah@chia-pet.org>
Removes skip_resource and raise .. if InSpec.os stuff from initialize as this is covered by platform support.
Signed-off-by: Miah Johnson <miah@chia-pet.org>
* Change shadow resource to use FilterTable rather than custom filter
implementation.
Add tests for singluar aliased methods and other minor changes to work
with FilterTable output.
Coverage is at 100%
Signed-off-by: Miah Johnson <miah@chia-pet.org>
* merge master
Signed-off-by: Miah Johnson <miah@chia-pet.org>
