Previous, require_controls was including all controls from the named
profile, despite the documented behavior being that it only includes
controls explicitly pulled in by the user. The cause was two-fold:
1) A previous refactor meant that we weren't removing the rule from the
correct context, and
2) We weren't descending down the dependency tree when filtering rules.
This commit fixes the require_controls DSL method and adds a test to
help prevent future regressions.
Signed-off-by: Steven Danna <steve@chef.io>
This commit threads through some state related to whether or not a
profile is "local", that is whether it is a directory on disk. If it
is, we then write out the lockfile to disk.
Signed-off-by: Steven Danna <steve@chef.io>
All resources from deps are added into the control_eval_context used by
the current profile. However, if there is a name conflict, the last
loaded resource wins. The new `require_resource` dsl method allows the
user to do the following:
require_resource(profile: 'profile_name',
resource: 'other',
as: 'renamed')
describe renamed do
...
end
Signed-off-by: Steven Danna <steve@chef.io>
This is a regression introduced by the changes from string to symbol
keys in v0.34.0. It seems that our test cookbook that had a nested
dependency example wasn't actually wired up to run.
This adds a basic functional test and corrects the typo.
Signed-off-by: Steven Danna <steve@chef.io>
This adds a new git fetcher. In doing so, it also refactors how the
fetchers work a bit to better support fetchers that need to resolve
user-provided sources to fully specified sources appropriate for a
lockfile.
Signed-off-by: Steven Danna <steve@chef.io>
A few minor issues were causing 3 functional test failures on OS X.
These were not program errors but where rather the result of the
profiles under test assuming a linux environment.
Since many of the developers who will work on this project in the future
will be running OS X, let's ensure they can run the functional tests
easily.
Signed-off-by: Steven Danna <steve@chef.io>
(1) The field is not yet optimal, the calculations are great!
(2) Changing this field should go together with all other breaking json changes, especially if https://github.com/chef/inspec/pull/811 results in a change.
Mixing types in an array without specifying what these fields point to is not just confusing, but also causes issues with endpoints that may consume this data and dont process mixed types. We strive to have a stable api for 1.0 and this is a sin that was left after the major overhaul. Time to fix it.
