3 files left to go, and they're behaving oddly so I'm leaving them out
in this pass. Looks like 21 deprecations left.
Signed-off-by: Ryan Davis <zenspider@chef.io>
I think this is probably in contention with my other PR on resource
initialization. We definitely need to change that, so this might fall
to the side. Or maybe just the test needs to be redone. We'll discuss
and see.
Signed-off-by: Ryan Davis <zenspider@chef.io>
This is a first pass at fixing the failure found by @scottvidmar where
file resource was raising undefined_method on nil. The problem was
that the initialize method for file was not being called at all
because Resource#initialize was returning early without reporting
anything.
This fix causes a failure in test/functional/inspec_exec_test.rb where
it is testing a similar scenario but for some reason the unsupported
resources get reported. We need to figure that part out, but in the
meantime this will at least report an error at the root cause rather
than down the road.
Fixes#4208
Signed-off-by: Ryan Davis <zenspider@chef.io>
BK currently runs our tests on ruby:X.Y-stretch docker images, which
use root. This puts license files it /etc/chef instead of the current
user's home and broke our tests.
This adds cleanup to /etc/chef AND checks both locations, so it should
continue to work even if we switch to docker images with non-root users.
Signed-off-by: Ryan Davis <zenspider@chef.io>
These were put in place because they pass locally and fail on
buildkite. We didn't care at the time, but now we should investigate.
Signed-off-by: Ryan Davis <zenspider@chef.io>
I've got this under debug in docker but this is a problem on the
license_acceptance gem on BK, not with inspec. And it is blocking a
release, so I'm bumping this out 2 weeks.
Signed-off-by: Ryan Davis <zenspider@chef.io>
This adds support for specifying a path to a profile in a Git repo.
For example, you could have a Git repo containing multiple profiles and
you want to specify a single one like below:
```yaml
depends:
- name: profile-1
git: https://github.com/myorg/all-my-profiles.git
profile_path: profiles/my-specific-profile-1
- name: profile-2
git: https://github.com/myorg/all-my-profiles.git
profile_path: profiles/my-specific-profile-2
```
Signed-off-by: Jerry Aldrich <jerryaldrichiii@gmail.com>
There is no reason why our tests should be failing because we deploy a
new version. That test shouldn't even be hitting the network for real.
Besides, the functionality has no place in our codebase. It's
functionality provided via `gem outdated` so why did we re-implement
it? And we expect most people to be running via omnibus, so they're
pinned to a specific version in the first place. Even if they updated,
they still couldn't run it and that would be more confusing.
Signed-off-by: Ryan Davis <zenspider@chef.io>
Not sure why these failures come up in a unified run (versus my
running all test files separately). Might be test infection. Might be
environmental.
Signed-off-by: Ryan Davis <zenspider@chef.io>
This activates a BUNCH of tests but keeps us green.
Whether these tests are valid or not is not being addressed here.
Signed-off-by: Ryan Davis <zenspider@chef.io>
