.. | ||
buckets | ||
php-tricks-esp | ||
apache.md | ||
artifactory-hacking-guide.md | ||
cgi.md | ||
code-review-tools.md | ||
drupal.md | ||
flask.md | ||
git.md | ||
golang.md | ||
graphql.md | ||
h2-java-sql-database.md | ||
iis-internet-information-services.md | ||
jboss.md | ||
jenkins.md | ||
jira.md | ||
joomla.md | ||
jsp.md | ||
laravel.md | ||
moodle.md | ||
nginx.md | ||
put-method-webdav.md | ||
python.md | ||
README.md | ||
spel-spring-expression-language.md | ||
spring-actuators.md | ||
symphony.md | ||
tomcat.md | ||
uncovering-cloudflare.md | ||
vmware-esx-vcenter....md | ||
web-api-pentesting.md | ||
werkzeug.md | ||
wordpress.md | ||
xss-to-rce-electron-desktop-apps.md |
80,443 - Pentesting Web Methodology
If you want to know about my latest modifications/additions or you have any suggestion for HackTricks or PEASS, join the 💬 PEASS & HackTricks telegram group here, or follow me on Twitter ****🐦****@carlospolopm.
If you want to share some tricks with the community you can also submit pull requests to https://github.com/carlospolop/hacktricks that will be reflected in this book.
Don't forget to give ⭐ on the github to motivate me to continue developing this book.
Basic Info
The web service is the most common and extensive service and a lot of different types of vulnerabilities exists.
Default port: 80 HTTP
, 443(HTTPS)
PORT STATE SERVICE
80/tcp open http
443/tcp open ssl/https
nc -v domain.com 80 # GET / HTTP/1.0
openssl s_client -connect domain.com:443 # GET / HTTP/1.0
Methodology summary
In this methodology we are going to suppose that you are going to a attack a domain
or subdomain
and only that. So, you should apply this methodology to each discovered domain, subdomain or IP with undetermined web server inside the scope.
- Start by identifying the technologies used by the web server. Look for tricks to keep in mind during the rest of the test if you can successfully identify the tech.
- Any known vulnerability of the version of the technology?
- Using any well known tech? Any useful trick to extract more information?
- Any specialised scanner to run
like wpscan
? - Any vulnerable cookie? JWT?
- Check for vulnerable proxies being used
_Test this in every new tech discovered in the webapp_
:- hop-by-hop headers
- Request Smuggling
- Cache Poisoning/Cache Deception
- Launch general purposes scanners. You never know if they are going to find something or if the are going to find some interesting information.
- Start with the initial checks: robots, sitemap, 404 error and SSL/TLS scan
if HTTPS
. - Start spidering the web page: It's time to find all the possible files, folders and parameters being used. Also, check for special findings.
- Note that anytime a new directory is discovered during brute-forcing or spidering, it should be spidered.
- Directory Brute-Forcing: Try to brute force all the discovered folders searching for new files and directories.
- Note that anytime a new directory is discovered during brute-forcing or spidering, it should be Brute-Forced.
- Backups checking: Test if you can find backups of discovered files appending common backup extensions.
- Brute-Force parameters: Try to find hidden parameters.
- Once you have identified all the possible endpoints accepting user input, check for all kind of vulnerabilities related to it.
- This is by far the most complex part of pentesting web, and depending of the vulnerability the pentester should know how to discover it. In this book you can find explained a lot of web vulnerabilities related to user input.
Server Version Vulnerable?
Identify
Check if there are known vulnerabilities for the server version that is running.
The HTTP headers and cookies of the response could be very useful to identify the technologies and/or version being used. Nmap scan can identify the server version, but it could also be useful the tools whatweb, webtech or https://builtwith.com/:
whatweb -a 1 <URL> #Stealthy
whatweb -a 3 <URL> #Aggresive
webtech -u <URL>
Search for vulnerabilities of the web application version
Check if any WAF
- https://github.com/EnableSecurity/wafw00f
- https://github.com/Ekultek/WhatWaf.git
- https://nmap.org/nsedoc/scripts/http-waf-detect.html
Cookies
As commented the cookies can be very useful to identify the technology in used if well known
but if the used cookies are custom, they could be vulnerable. So if you find a custom sensitive cookie you should check it for vulnerabilities.
Also, the flags of the cookies can also be interesting from a security point of view.
Web tech tricks
Some tricks for finding vulnerabilities in different well known technologies being used:
- IIS tricks
- PHP (php has a lot of interesting tricks that could be exploited
- Nginx
- Python
- Flask
- WebDav
- CGI
- Tomcat
- Jenkins
- JBOSS
- JIRA
- JSP
- Wordpress
- Drupal
- ****Moodle****
- VMWare (EXS, VCenter
- GraphQL
If the source code of the application is available in github, apart of performing by your own a White box test of the application no guide available yet in hacktricks
there is some information that could be useful for the current Black-Box testing:
- Is there a Changelog or Readme or Version file or anything with version info accesible via web?
- How and where are saved the credentials? Is there any
accesible?
file with credentialsusernames or passwords
? - Are passwords in plain text, encrypted or which hashing algorithm is used?
- Is it using any master key for encrypting something? Which algorithm is used?
- Can you access any of these files exploiting some vulnerability?
- Is there any interesting information in the github
solved and not solved
issues? Or in commit historymaybe some **password introduced inside an old commit**
?
Take into account that the same domain can be using different technologies in different ports, folders and subdomains.
If the web application is using any well known tech/platform listed before or any other, don't forget to search on the Internet new tricks and let me know!
.
Proxies/Load balances vulnerabilities
You should look for these kind of vulnerabilities every time you find a path were a different technology is running. For example, if you find a java webapp and in /wordpress
a wordpress is running.
- Abusing hop-by-hop headers
- Request Smuggling
- Cache Poisoning / Cache Deception
- Uncovering CloudFlare
Automatic scanners
General purpose automatic scanners
nikto -h <URL>
whatweb -a 4 <URL>
wapiti -u <URL>
W3af
zarpxy #You can use an API
nuclei -t nuclei-templates
CMS scanners
If a CMS is used don't forget to run a scanner, maybe something juicy is found:
Clusterd: JBoss, ColdFusion, WebLogic, Tomcat, Railo, Axis2, Glassfish
CMSScan: WordPress, Drupal, Joomla, vBulletin websites for Security issues. GUI
VulnX: Joomla, Wordpress, Drupal, PrestaShop, Opencart
CMSMap: (W)ordpress, (J)oomla, (D)rupal or (M)oodle
droopscan: Drupal, Joomla, Moodle, Silverstripe, Wordpress
cmsmap [-f W] -F -d <URL>
wpscan --force update -e --url <URL>
joomscan --ec -u <URL>
joomlavs.rb #https://github.com/rastating/joomlavs
At this point you should already have some information of the web server being used by the client
if any data is given
and some tricks to keep in mind during the test. If you are lucky you have even found a CMS and run some scanner.
Step-by-step Web Application testing
From this point we are going to start interacting with the web application.
Initial checks
Default pages with interesting info:
- /robots.txt
- /sitemap.xml
- Some 404 error - Some interesting data could be presented here.
Check if you can upload files [PUT verb, WebDav](put-method-webdav.md)
If you find that WebDav is enabled but you don't have enough permissions for uploading files in the root folder try to:
- Brute Force credentials
- Upload files via WebDav to the rest of found folders inside the web page. You may have permissions to upload files in other folders.
SSL/TLS vulnerabilites
Use testssl.sh to checks for vulnerabilities In Bug Bounty programs probably these kind of vulnerabilities won't be accepted
and use a2sv to recheck the vulnerabilities:
./testssl.sh [--htmlfile] 10.10.10.10:443
#Use the --htmlfile to save the output inside an htmlfile also
## You can also use other tools, by testssl.sh at this momment is the best one (I think)
sslscan <host:port>
sslyze --regular <ip:port>
Information about SSL/TLS vulnerabilities:
- https://www.gracefulsecurity.com/tls-ssl-vulnerabilities/
- https://www.acunetix.com/blog/articles/tls-vulnerabilities-attacks-final-part/
Spidering
Launch some kind of spider inside the web. The goal of the spider is to find as much paths as possible from the tested application. Therefore, web crawling and external sources should be used to find as much valid paths as possible.
- gospider
go
: HTML spider, LinkFinder in JS files and external sourcesArchive.org, CommonCrawl.org, VirusTotal.com, AlienVault.com
. - hakrawler
go
: HML spider, with LinkFider for JS files and Archive.org as external source. - dirhunt
python
: HTML spider, also indicates "juicy files". - evine
go
: Interactive CLI HTML spider. It also searches in Archive.org - meg
go
: This tool isn't a spider but it can be useful. You can just indicate a file with hosts and a file with paths and meg will fetch each path on each host and save the response. - urlgrab
go
: HTML spider with JS rendering capabilities. However, it looks like it's unmaintained, the precompiled version is old and the current code doesn't compile - gau go): HTML spider that uses external providers
wayback, otx, commoncrawl
- ParamSpider: This script will find URLs with parameter and will list them.
- galer
go
: HTML spider with JS rendering capabilities. - LinkFinder
python
: HTML spider, with JS beautify capabilities capable of search new paths in JS files. It could be worth it also take a look to ****JSScanner, which is a wrapper of LinkFinder. - JSParser
python2.7
: A python 2.7 script using Tornado and JSBeautifier to parse relative URLs from JavaScript files. Useful for easily discovering AJAX requests. Looks like unmaintaned. - relative-url-extractor
ruby
: Given a fileHTML
it will extract URLs from it using nifty regular expression to find and extract the relative URLs from uglyminify
files.
Brute Force directories and files
Start brute-forcing from the root folder and be sure to brute-force all the directories found using this method and all the directories discovered by the Spidering you can do this brute-forcing **recursively** and appending at the beginning of the used wordlist the names of the found directories
.
Tools:
- Dirb / Dirbuster - Included in Kali, old
and **slow**
but functional. Allow auto-signed certificates and recursive search. Too slow compared with th other options. - Dirsearch (python): It doesn't allow auto-signed certificates but allows recursive search.
- Gobuster
go
: It allows auto-signed certificates, it doesn't have recursive search. - Feroxbuster - Fast, supports recursive search.
- wfuzz
wfuzz -w /usr/share/seclists/Discovery/Web-Content/raft-medium-directories.txt https://domain.com/api/FUZZ
- ffuf - Fast:
ffuf -c -w /usr/share/wordlists/dirb/big.txt -u http://10.10.10.10/FUZZ
Recommended dictionaries:
- https://github.com/danielmiessler/RobotsDisallowed
Very interesting
- Seclists
- Dirsearch included dictionary
- http://gist.github.com/jhaddix/b80ea67d85c13206125806f0828f4d10
- Assetnote wordlists
- /usr/share/wordlists/dirb/common.txt
- /usr/share/wordlists/dirb/big.txt
- /usr/share/wordlists/dirbuster/directory-list-2.3-medium.txt
Note that anytime a new directory is discovered during brute-forcing or spidering, it should be Brute-Forced.
What to check on each file found
- Broken link checker: Find broken links inside HTMLs that may be prone to takeovers
- File Backups: Once you have found all the files, look for backups of all the executable files
"_.php_", "_.aspx_"...
. Common variations for naming a backup are: file.ext~, #file.ext#, ~file.ext, file.ext.bak, file.ext.tmp, file.ext.old, file.bak, file.tmp and file.old - Discover new parameters: You can use tools like Arjun and parameth to discover hidden parameters. If you can, you could try to search hidden parameters on each executable web file.
- Comments: Check the comments of all the files, you can find credentials or hidden functionality.
- If you are playing CTF, a "common" trick is to hide information inside comments at the right of the page
using **hundreds** of **spaces** so you don't see the data if you open the source code with the browser
. Other possibility is to use several new lines and hide information in a comment at the bottom of the web page.
- If you are playing CTF, a "common" trick is to hide information inside comments at the right of the page
- API keys: If you find any API key there is guide that indicates how to use API keys of different platforms: keyhacks, zile, truffleHog, SecretFinder, [RegHex](https://github.com/l4yton/RegHex%29).
- Google API keys: If you find any API key looking like AIzaSyA-qLheq6xjDiEIRisP_ujUseYLQCHUjik you can use the project gmapapiscanner ****to check which apis the key can access.
- S3 Buckets: While spidering look if any subdomain or any link is related with some S3 bucket. In that case, check the permissions of the bucket.
Special findings
While performing the spidering and brute-forcing you could find interesting things that you have to notice.
Interesting files
- Look for links to other files inside the CSS files.
- If you find a .git file some information can be extracted
- If you find a .env information such as api keys, dbs passwords and other information can be found.
- If you find API endpoints you should also test them. These aren't files, but will probably "look like" them.
- JS files: In the spidering section several tools that can extract path from JS files were mentioned. Also, It would be interesting to monitor each JS file found, as in some ocations, a change may indicate that a potential vulnerability was introduced in the code. You could use for example JSMon.
- You should also check discovered JS files with RetireJS _**_to find if it's vulnerable.
- Javascript Deobfuscator and Unpacker
[https://lelinhtinh.github.io/de4js/](https://lelinhtinh.github.io/de4js/)
- Javascript Beautifier
[http://jsbeautifier.org/](https://beautifier.io/)
- BrainFuck deobfuscation
javascript with chars:"\[\]!+" [https://ooze.ninja/javascript/poisonjs/](https://ooze.ninja/javascript/poisonjs/)
- In several occasions you will need to understand regular expressions used, this will be useful: https://regex101.com/
- You could also monitor the files were forms were detected, as a change in the parameter or the apearance f a new form may indicate a potential new vulnerable functionality.
403 Forbidden/Basic Authentication/401 Unauthorized bypass
-
Try using different verbs to access the file: GET, POST, INVENTED
-
If /path is blocked, try using /%2e/path
if the access is blocked by a proxy, this could bypass the protection
. Try also /%252e/pathdouble URL encode
-
Try Unicode bypass: /%ef%bc%8fpath
The URL encoded chars are like "/"
so when encoded back it will be //path and maybe you will have already bypassed the /path name check -
Try to stress the server sending common GET requests
[It worked for this guy wit Facebook](https://medium.com/@amineaboud/story-of-a-weird-vulnerability-i-found-on-facebook-fc0875eb5125)
. -
Change the protocol: from http to https, or for https to http
-
Change Host header to some arbitrary value
[that worked here](https://medium.com/@sechunter/exploiting-admin-panel-like-a-boss-fc2dd2499d31)
-
Other path bypasses:
- site.com/secret –> HTTP 403 Forbidden
- site.com/SECRET –> HTTP 200 OK
- site.com/secret/ –> HTTP 200 OK
- site.com/secret/. –> HTTP 200 OK
- site.com//secret// –> HTTP 200 OK
- site.com/./secret/.. –> HTTP 200 OK
- site.com/secret.json –> HTTP 200 OK
ruby
-
Other bypasses:
- /v3/users_data/1234 --> 403 Forbidden
- /v1/users_data/1234 --> 200 OK
- {“id”:111} --> 401 Unauthriozied
- {“id”:[111]} --> 200 OK
- {“id”:111} --> 401 Unauthriozied
- {“id”:{“id”:111}} --> 200 OK
- {"user_id":"<legit_id>","user_id":"<victims_id>"}
JSON Parameter Pollution
- user_id=ATTACKER_ID&user_id=VICTIM_ID
Parameter Pollution
-
Go to https://archive.org/web/ and check if in the past that file was worldwide accessible.
-
Fuzz the page: Try using HTTP Proxy Headers, HTTP Authentication Basic and NTLM brute-force
with a few combinations only
and other techniques. To do all of this I have created the tool fuzzhttpbypass.X-Originating-IP: 127.0.0.1
X-Forwarded-For: 127.0.0.1
X-Remote-IP: 127.0.0.1
X-Remote-Addr: 127.0.0.1
X-ProxyUser-Ip: 127.0.0.1
X-Original-URL: 127.0.0.1
- If the path is protected you can try to bypass the path protection using these other headers:
X-Original-URL: /admin/console
X-Rewrite-URL: /admin/console
-
Guess the password: Test the following common credentials. Do you know something about the victim? Or the CTF challenge name?
-
Brute force: Try basic, digest and NTLM auth.
{% code title="Common creds" %}
admin admin admin password admin 1234 admin admin1234 admin 123456 root toor test test guest guest
{% endcode %}
502 Proxy Error
If any page responds with that code, it's probably a bad configured proxy. If you send a HTTP request like: GET https://google.com HTTP/1.1
with the host header and other common headers
, the proxy will try to access google.com **and you will have found a SSRF**.
NTLM Authentication - Info disclosure
If the running server asking for authentication is Windows or you find a login asking for your credentials and asking for **domain** **name**
, you can provoke an information disclosure.
Send the header: “Authorization: NTLM TlRMTVNTUAABAAAAB4IIAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA=”
and due to how the NTLM authentication works, the server will respond with internal info IIS version, Windows version...
inside the header "WWW-Authenticate".
You can automate this using the nmap plugin "http-ntlm-info.nse".
HTTP Redirect CTF
It is possible to put content inside a Redirection. This content won't be shown to the user as the browser will execute the redirection
but something could be hidden in there.
User input related vulnerabilities special mention
Bypass regular login (POST or GET method)
If you find a login page, here you can find some techniques to try to bypass it:
- Check for comments inside the page
scroll down and to the right?
- Check if you can directly access the restricted pages
- Check to not send the parameters
do not send any or only 1
- Test manually very common passwords.
- Check for default credentials
- Check for common combinations
root, admin, password, name of the tech, default user with one of these passwords
- Check the PHP comparisons error: user[]=a&pwd=b , user=a&pwd[]=b , user[]=a&pwd[]=b
- Create a dictionary using Cewl, add the default username and password
if there is
and try to brute-force it using all the words as usernames and password - Try to brute-force using a bigger dictionary (Brute force)
You should also check for:
Insert into/Create Object
Check for SQL INSERT INTO Injections
Upload Files
Check for this vulnerabilities:
User input Web Vulnerabilities list
- 2FA Bypass
- Captcha Bypass
- Clickjacking
- Client Side Template Injection (CSTI
- Command Injection
- Content Security Policy
CSP
Bypass - Cookies Hacking
- CORS - Misconfigurations & Bypass
- CRLF Injection
- CSRF (Cross Site Request Forgery
- Dangling Markup - HTML scriptless injection
- Deserialization
- Email Header Injection
- File Inclusion
- File Upload
- IDOR
- JWT Vulnerabilities
- NoSQL Injection
- LDAP Injection
- Open Redirect
- Race Condition
- SQL Injection
- SSRF (Server Side Request Forgery
- SSTI (Server Side Template Injection
- Unicode Normalization vulnerability
- XPATH Injection
- XSLT Server Side Injection
- XXE (XML External Entity
- XSS (Cross Site Scripting
- XS-Search
More references for each Web Vulnerability: https://cyberzombie.in/bug-bounty-methodology-techniques-tools-procedures/
Another checklist: https://six2dez.gitbook.io/pentest-book/others/web-checklist