# CSRF (Cross Site Request Forgery)
{% hint style="success" %}
Learn & practice AWS Hacking:[**HackTricks Training AWS Red Team Expert (ARTE)**](https://training.hacktricks.xyz/courses/arte)\
Learn & practice GCP Hacking: [**HackTricks Training GCP Red Team Expert (GRTE)**](https://training.hacktricks.xyz/courses/grte)
Support HackTricks
* Check the [**subscription plans**](https://github.com/sponsors/carlospolop)!
* **Join the** 💬 [**Discord group**](https://discord.gg/hRep4RUj7f) or the [**telegram group**](https://t.me/peass) or **follow** us on **Twitter** 🐦 [**@hacktricks\_live**](https://twitter.com/hacktricks\_live)**.**
* **Share hacking tricks by submitting PRs to the** [**HackTricks**](https://github.com/carlospolop/hacktricks) and [**HackTricks Cloud**](https://github.com/carlospolop/hacktricks-cloud) github repos.
{% endhint %}
Join [**HackenProof Discord**](https://discord.com/invite/N3FrSbmwdy) server to communicate with experienced hackers and bug bounty hunters!
**Hacking Insights**\
Engage with content that delves into the thrill and challenges of hacking
**Real-Time Hack News**\
Keep up-to-date with fast-paced hacking world through real-time news and insights
**Latest Announcements**\
Stay informed with the newest bug bounties launching and crucial platform updates
**Join us on** [**Discord**](https://discord.com/invite/N3FrSbmwdy) and start collaborating with top hackers today!
## Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) Explained
**Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)** is a type of security vulnerability found in web applications. It enables attackers to perform actions on behalf of unsuspecting users by exploiting their authenticated sessions. The attack is executed when a user, who is logged into a victim's platform, visits a malicious site. This site then triggers requests to the victim's account through methods like executing JavaScript, submitting forms, or fetching images.
### Prerequisites for a CSRF Attack
To exploit a CSRF vulnerability, several conditions must be met:
1. **Identify a Valuable Action**: The attacker needs to find an action worth exploiting, such as changing the user's password, email, or elevating privileges.
2. **Session Management**: The user's session should be managed solely through cookies or the HTTP Basic Authentication header, as other headers cannot be manipulated for this purpose.
3. **Absence of Unpredictable Parameters**: The request should not contain unpredictable parameters, as they can prevent the attack.
### Quick Check
You could **capture the request in Burp** and check CSRF protections and to test from the bowser you can click on **Copy as fetch** and check the request:
### Defending Against CSRF
Several countermeasures can be implemented to protect against CSRF attacks:
* [**SameSite cookies**](hacking-with-cookies/#samesite): This attribute prevents the browser from sending cookies along with cross-site requests. [More about SameSite cookies](hacking-with-cookies/#samesite).
* [**Cross-origin resource sharing**](cors-bypass.md): The CORS policy of the victim site can influence the feasibility of the attack, especially if the attack requires reading the response from the victim site. [Learn about CORS bypass](cors-bypass.md).
* **User Verification**: Prompting for the user's password or solving a captcha can confirm the user's intent.
* **Checking Referrer or Origin Headers**: Validating these headers can help ensure requests are coming from trusted sources. However, careful crafting of URLs can bypass poorly implemented checks, such as:
* Using `http://mal.net?orig=http://example.com` (URL ends with the trusted URL)
* Using `http://example.com.mal.net` (URL starts with the trusted URL)
* **Modifying Parameter Names**: Altering the names of parameters in POST or GET requests can help in preventing automated attacks.
* **CSRF Tokens**: Incorporating a unique CSRF token in each session and requiring this token in subsequent requests can significantly mitigate the risk of CSRF. The effectiveness of the token can be enhanced by enforcing CORS.
Understanding and implementing these defenses is crucial for maintaining the security and integrity of web applications.
## Defences Bypass
### From POST to GET
Maybe the form you want to abuse is prepared to send a **POST request with a CSRF token but**, you should **check** if a **GET** is also **valid** and if when you send a GET request the **CSRF token is still being validated**.
### Lack of token
Applications might implement a mechanism to **validate tokens** when they are present. However, a vulnerability arises if the validation is skipped altogether when the token is absent. Attackers can exploit this by **removing the parameter** that carries the token, not just its value. This allows them to circumvent the validation process and conduct a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) attack effectively.
### CSRF token is not tied to the user session
Applications **not tying CSRF tokens to user sessions** present a significant **security risk**. These systems verify tokens against a **global pool** rather than ensuring each token is bound to the initiating session.
Here's how attackers exploit this:
1. **Authenticate** using their own account.
2. **Obtain a valid CSRF token** from the global pool.
3. **Use this token** in a CSRF attack against a victim.
This vulnerability allows attackers to make unauthorized requests on behalf of the victim, exploiting the application's **inadequate token validation mechanism**.
### Method bypass
If the request is using a "**weird**" **method**, check if the **method** **override functionality** is working. For example, if it's **using a PUT** method you can try to **use a POST** method and **send**: _https://example.com/my/dear/api/val/num?**\_method=PUT**_
This could also works sending the **\_method parameter inside the a POST request** or using the **headers**:
* _X-HTTP-Method_
* _X-HTTP-Method-Override_
* _X-Method-Override_
### Custom header token bypass
If the request is adding a **custom header** with a **token** to the request as **CSRF protection method**, then:
* Test the request without the **Customized Token and also header.**
* Test the request with exact **same length but different token**.
### CSRF token is verified by a cookie
Applications may implement CSRF protection by duplicating the token in both a cookie and a request parameter or by setting a CSRF cookie and verifying if the token sent in the backend corresponds to the cookie. The application validates requests by checking if the token in the request parameter aligns with the value in the cookie.
However, this method is vulnerable to CSRF attacks if the website has flaws allowing an attacker to set a CSRF cookie in the victim's browser, such as a CRLF vulnerability. The attacker can exploit this by loading a deceptive image that sets the cookie, followed by initiating the CSRF attack.
Below is an example of how an attack could be structured:
```html
```
{% hint style="info" %}
Note that if the **csrf token is related with the session cookie this attack won't work** because you will need to set the victim your session, and therefore you will be attacking yourself.
{% endhint %}
### Content-Type change
According to [**this**](https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTTP/CORS#simple\_requests), in order to **avoid preflight** requests using **POST** method these are the allowed Content-Type values:
* **`application/x-www-form-urlencoded`**
* **`multipart/form-data`**
* **`text/plain`**
However, note that the **severs logic may vary** depending on the **Content-Type** used so you should try the values mentioned and others like **`application/json`**_**,**_**`text/xml`**, **`application/xml`**_._
Example (from [here](https://brycec.me/posts/corctf\_2021\_challenges)) of sending JSON data as text/plain:
```html
```
### Bypassing Preflight Requests for JSON Data
When attempting to send JSON data via a POST request, using the `Content-Type: application/json` in an HTML form is not directly possible. Similarly, utilizing `XMLHttpRequest` to send this content type initiates a preflight request. Nonetheless, there are strategies to potentially bypass this limitation and check if the server processes the JSON data irrespective of the Content-Type:
1. **Use Alternative Content Types**: Employ `Content-Type: text/plain` or `Content-Type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded` by setting `enctype="text/plain"` in the form. This approach tests if the backend utilizes the data regardless of the Content-Type.
2. **Modify Content Type**: To avoid a preflight request while ensuring the server recognizes the content as JSON, you can send the data with `Content-Type: text/plain; application/json`. This doesn't trigger a preflight request but might be processed correctly by the server if it's configured to accept `application/json`.
3. **SWF Flash File Utilization**: A less common but feasible method involves using an SWF flash file to bypass such restrictions. For an in-depth understanding of this technique, refer to [this post](https://anonymousyogi.medium.com/json-csrf-csrf-that-none-talks-about-c2bf9a480937).
### Referrer / Origin check bypass
**Avoid Referrer header**
Applications may validate the 'Referer' header only when it's present. To prevent a browser from sending this header, the following HTML meta tag can be used:
```xml
```
This ensures the 'Referer' header is omitted, potentially bypassing validation checks in some applications.
**Regexp bypasses**
{% content-ref url="ssrf-server-side-request-forgery/url-format-bypass.md" %}
[url-format-bypass.md](ssrf-server-side-request-forgery/url-format-bypass.md)
{% endcontent-ref %}
To set the domain name of the server in the URL that the Referrer is going to send inside the parameters you can do:
```html
```
### **HEAD method bypass**
The first part of [**this CTF writeup**](https://github.com/google/google-ctf/tree/master/2023/web-vegsoda/solution) is explained that [Oak's source code](https://github.com/oakserver/oak/blob/main/router.ts#L281), a router is set to **handle HEAD requests as GET requests** with no response body - a common workaround that isn't unique to Oak. Instead of a specific handler that deals with HEAD reqs, they're simply **given to the GET handler but the app just removes the response body**.
Therefore, if a GET request is being limited, you could just **send a HEAD request that will be processed as a GET request**.
## **Exploit Examples**
### **Exfiltrating CSRF Token**
If a **CSRF token** is being used as **defence** you could try to **exfiltrate it** abusing a [**XSS**](xss-cross-site-scripting/#xss-stealing-csrf-tokens) vulnerability or a [**Dangling Markup**](dangling-markup-html-scriptless-injection/) vulnerability.
### **GET using HTML tags**
```xml
404 - Page not found
The URL you are requesting is no longer available
```
Other HTML5 tags that can be used to automatically send a GET request are:
```html