- Do you work in a **cybersecurity company**? Do you want to see your **company advertised in HackTricks**? or do you want to have access to the **latest version of the PEASS or download HackTricks in PDF**? Check the [**SUBSCRIPTION PLANS**](https://github.com/sponsors/carlospolop)!
- **Join the** [**💬**](https://emojipedia.org/speech-balloon/) [**Discord group**](https://discord.gg/hRep4RUj7f) or the [**telegram group**](https://t.me/peass) or **follow** me on **Twitter** [**🐦**](https://github.com/carlospolop/hacktricks/tree/7af18b62b3bdc423e11444677a6a73d4043511e9/\[https:/emojipedia.org/bird/README.md)[**@carlospolopm**](https://twitter.com/carlospolopm)**.**
The root directive specifies the root folder for Nginx. In the above example, the root folder is `/etc/nginx` which means that we can reach files within that folder. The above configuration does not have a location for `/ (location / {...})`, only for `/hello.txt`. Because of this, the `root` directive will be globally set, meaning that requests to `/` will take you to the local path `/etc/nginx`.
A request as simple as `GET /nginx.conf` would reveal the contents of the Nginx configuration file stored in `/etc/nginx/nginx.conf`. If the root is set to `/etc`, a `GET` request to `/nginx/nginx.conf` would reveal the configuration file. In some cases it is possible to reach other configuration files, access-logs and even encrypted credentials for HTTP basic authentication.
**So, if you find some Nginx server you should check for this vulnerability. Also, you can discover it if you find that the files/directories brute force is behaving weird.**
More info: [https://www.acunetix.com/vulnerabilities/web/path-traversal-via-misconfigured-nginx-alias/](https://www.acunetix.com/vulnerabilities/web/path-traversal-via-misconfigured-nginx-alias/)
The new line characters for HTTP requests are \r (Carriage Return) and \n (Line Feed). URL-encoding the new line characters results in the following representation of the characters `%0d%0a`. When these characters are included in a request like `http://localhost/%0d%0aDetectify:%20clrf` to a server with the misconfiguration, the server will respond with a new header named `Detectify` since the $uri variable contains the URL-decoded new line characters.
Learn more about the risks of CRLF injection and response splitting at [https://blog.detectify.com/2019/06/14/http-response-splitting-exploitations-and-mitigations/](https://blog.detectify.com/2019/06/14/http-response-splitting-exploitations-and-mitigations/).
In some cases, user-supplied data can be treated as an Nginx variable. It’s unclear why this may be happening, but it’s not that uncommon or easy to test for as seen in this [H1 report](https://hackerone.com/reports/370094). If we search for the error message, we can see that it is found in the [SSI filter module](https://github.com/nginx/nginx/blob/2187586207e1465d289ae64cedc829719a048a39/src/http/modules/ngx\_http\_ssi\_filter\_module.c#L365), thus revealing that this is due to SSI.
We scanned for this misconfiguration and found several instances where a user could print the value of Nginx variables. The number of found vulnerable instances has declined which could indicate that this was patched.
With Nginx’s `proxy_pass`, there’s the possibility to intercept errors and HTTP headers created by the backend. This is very useful if you want to hide internal error messages and headers so they are instead handled by Nginx. Nginx will automatically serve a custom error page if the backend answers with one. But what if Nginx does not understand that it’s an HTTP response?
If a client sends an invalid HTTP request to Nginx, that request will be forwarded as-is to the backend, and the backend will answer with its raw content. Then, Nginx won’t understand the invalid HTTP response and just forward it to the client. Imagine a uWSGI application like this:
[proxy\_intercept\_errors](http://nginx.org/en/docs/http/ngx\_http\_proxy\_module.html#proxy\_intercept\_errors) will serve a custom response if the backend has a response status greater than 300. In our uWSGI application above, we will send a `500 Error` which would be intercepted by Nginx.
[proxy\_hide\_header](http://nginx.org/en/docs/http/ngx\_http\_proxy\_module.html#proxy\_hide\_header) is pretty much self explanatory; it will hide any specified HTTP header from the client.
The [merge\_slashes](http://nginx.org/en/docs/http/ngx\_http\_core\_module.html#merge\_slashes) directive is set to “on” by default which is a mechanism to compress two or more forward slashes into one, so `///` would become `/`. If Nginx is used as a reverse-proxy and the application that’s being proxied is vulnerable to local file inclusion, using extra slashes in the request could leave room for exploit it. This is described in detail by [Danny Robinson and Rotem Bar](https://medium.com/appsflyer/nginx-may-be-protecting-your-applications-from-traversal-attacks-without-you-even-knowing-b08f882fd43d).
It is easy to forget about `default` value. So **malefactor can bypass this "authorization control"** simply accessing a **non existent case inside `/map-poc`** like `https://targethost.com/map-poc/another-private-area`.
According to this post: [http://blog.zorinaq.com/nginx-resol**ver-vulns/**](http://blog.zorinaq.com/nginx-resolver-vulns/) **It might be possible to spoof DNS records** to Nginx if you **know the DNS server Nginx** is using (and you can intercept somehow the communication, so this is **not valid if 127.0.0.1** is used) and the **domain it's asking**.
If the nginx server is configured to pass the Upgrade and Connection headers an [**h2c Smuggling attack**](../../pentesting-web/h2c-smuggling.md) could be performed to access protected/internal endpoints.
{% hint style="danger" %}
This vulnerability would allow an attacker to **stablish a direct connection with the `proxy_pass` endpoint** (`http://backend:9999` in this case) that whose content is not going to be checked by nginx.
{% endhint %}
Example of vulnerable configuration to steal `/flag` from [here](https://bishopfox.com/blog/h2c-smuggling-request):
Note that even if the `proxy_pass` was pointing to a specific **path** such as `http://backend:9999/socket.io` the connection will be stablished with `http://backend:9999` so you can **contact any other path inside that internal endpoint. So it doesn't matter if a path is specified in the URL of proxy\_pass.**
Detectify has created a GitHub repository where you can use Docker to set up your own vulnerable Nginx test server with some of the misconfigurations discussed in this article and try finding them yourself!
- Do you work in a **cybersecurity company**? Do you want to see your **company advertised in HackTricks**? or do you want to have access to the **latest version of the PEASS or download HackTricks in PDF**? Check the [**SUBSCRIPTION PLANS**](https://github.com/sponsors/carlospolop)!
- **Join the** [**💬**](https://emojipedia.org/speech-balloon/) [**Discord group**](https://discord.gg/hRep4RUj7f) or the [**telegram group**](https://t.me/peass) or **follow** me on **Twitter** [**🐦**](https://github.com/carlospolop/hacktricks/tree/7af18b62b3bdc423e11444677a6a73d4043511e9/\[https:/emojipedia.org/bird/README.md)[**@carlospolopm**](https://twitter.com/carlospolopm)**.**