gotosocial/internal/visibility/statusvisible.go
Tobi Smethurst 82d9f88e42
Timeline improvements (#41)
Tidying up.
Parent/child statuses now display correctly in status/id/context.
2021-06-17 18:02:33 +02:00

197 lines
7.7 KiB
Go

package visibility
import (
"errors"
"fmt"
"github.com/sirupsen/logrus"
"github.com/superseriousbusiness/gotosocial/internal/db"
"github.com/superseriousbusiness/gotosocial/internal/gtsmodel"
)
func (f *filter) StatusVisible(targetStatus *gtsmodel.Status, requestingAccount *gtsmodel.Account) (bool, error) {
l := f.log.WithFields(logrus.Fields{
"func": "StatusVisible",
"statusID": targetStatus.ID,
"requestingAccountID": requestingAccount.ID,
})
relevantAccounts, err := f.pullRelevantAccountsFromStatus(targetStatus)
if err != nil {
l.Debugf("error pulling relevant accounts for status %s: %s", targetStatus.ID, err)
}
targetAccount := relevantAccounts.StatusAuthor
// if target account is suspended then don't show the status
if !targetAccount.SuspendedAt.IsZero() {
l.Trace("target account suspended at is not zero")
return false, nil
}
// if the target user doesn't exist (anymore) then the status also shouldn't be visible
// note: we only do this for local users
if targetAccount.Domain == "" {
targetUser := &gtsmodel.User{}
if err := f.db.GetWhere([]db.Where{{Key: "account_id", Value: targetAccount.ID}}, targetUser); err != nil {
l.Debug("target user could not be selected")
if _, ok := err.(db.ErrNoEntries); ok {
return false, nil
}
return false, fmt.Errorf("StatusVisible: db error selecting user for local target account %s: %s", targetAccount.ID, err)
}
// if target user is disabled, not yet approved, or not confirmed then don't show the status
// (although in the latter two cases it's unlikely they posted a status yet anyway, but you never know!)
if targetUser.Disabled || !targetUser.Approved || targetUser.ConfirmedAt.IsZero() {
l.Trace("target user is disabled, not approved, or not confirmed")
return false, nil
}
}
// if the requesting user doesn't exist (anymore) then the status also shouldn't be visible
// note: we only do this for local users
if requestingAccount.Domain == "" {
requestingUser := &gtsmodel.User{}
if err := f.db.GetWhere([]db.Where{{Key: "account_id", Value: requestingAccount.ID}}, requestingUser); err != nil {
// if the requesting account is local but doesn't have a corresponding user in the db this is a problem
l.Debug("requesting user could not be selected")
if _, ok := err.(db.ErrNoEntries); ok {
return false, nil
}
return false, fmt.Errorf("StatusVisible: db error selecting user for local requesting account %s: %s", requestingAccount.ID, err)
}
// okay, user exists, so make sure it has full privileges/is confirmed/approved
if requestingUser.Disabled || !requestingUser.Approved || requestingUser.ConfirmedAt.IsZero() {
l.Trace("requesting account is local but corresponding user is either disabled, not approved, or not confirmed")
return false, nil
}
}
// If requesting account is nil, that means whoever requested the status didn't auth, or their auth failed.
// In this case, we can still serve the status if it's public, otherwise we definitely shouldn't.
if requestingAccount == nil {
if targetStatus.Visibility == gtsmodel.VisibilityPublic {
return true, nil
}
l.Trace("requesting account is nil but the target status isn't public")
return false, nil
}
// if requesting account is suspended then don't show the status -- although they probably shouldn't have gotten
// this far (ie., been authed) in the first place: this is just for safety.
if !requestingAccount.SuspendedAt.IsZero() {
l.Trace("requesting account is suspended")
return false, nil
}
// if the target status belongs to the requesting account, they should always be able to view it at this point
if targetStatus.AccountID == requestingAccount.ID {
return true, nil
}
// At this point we have a populated targetAccount, targetStatus, and requestingAccount, so we can check for blocks and whathaveyou
// First check if a block exists directly between the target account (which authored the status) and the requesting account.
if blocked, err := f.db.Blocked(targetAccount.ID, requestingAccount.ID); err != nil {
l.Debugf("something went wrong figuring out if the accounts have a block: %s", err)
return false, err
} else if blocked {
// don't allow the status to be viewed if a block exists in *either* direction between these two accounts, no creepy stalking please
l.Trace("a block exists between requesting account and target account")
return false, nil
}
// status replies to account id
if relevantAccounts.ReplyToAccount != nil && relevantAccounts.ReplyToAccount.ID != requestingAccount.ID {
if blocked, err := f.db.Blocked(relevantAccounts.ReplyToAccount.ID, requestingAccount.ID); err != nil {
return false, err
} else if blocked {
l.Trace("a block exists between requesting account and reply to account")
return false, nil
}
// check reply to ID
if targetStatus.InReplyToID != "" && (targetStatus.Visibility == gtsmodel.VisibilityFollowersOnly || targetStatus.Visibility == gtsmodel.VisibilityDirect) {
followsRepliedAccount, err := f.db.Follows(requestingAccount, relevantAccounts.ReplyToAccount)
if err != nil {
return false, err
}
if !followsRepliedAccount {
l.Trace("target status is a followers-only reply to an account that is not followed by the requesting account")
return false, nil
}
}
}
// status boosts accounts id
if relevantAccounts.BoostedAccount != nil {
if blocked, err := f.db.Blocked(relevantAccounts.BoostedAccount.ID, requestingAccount.ID); err != nil {
return false, err
} else if blocked {
l.Trace("a block exists between requesting account and boosted account")
return false, nil
}
}
// status boosts a reply to account id
if relevantAccounts.BoostedReplyToAccount != nil {
if blocked, err := f.db.Blocked(relevantAccounts.BoostedReplyToAccount.ID, requestingAccount.ID); err != nil {
return false, err
} else if blocked {
l.Trace("a block exists between requesting account and boosted reply to account")
return false, nil
}
}
// status mentions accounts
for _, a := range relevantAccounts.MentionedAccounts {
if blocked, err := f.db.Blocked(a.ID, requestingAccount.ID); err != nil {
return false, err
} else if blocked {
l.Trace("a block exists between requesting account and a mentioned account")
return false, nil
}
}
// if the requesting account is mentioned in the status it should always be visible
for _, acct := range relevantAccounts.MentionedAccounts {
if acct.ID == requestingAccount.ID {
return true, nil // yep it's mentioned!
}
}
// at this point we know neither account blocks the other, or another account mentioned or otherwise referred to in the status
// that means it's now just a matter of checking the visibility settings of the status itself
switch targetStatus.Visibility {
case gtsmodel.VisibilityPublic, gtsmodel.VisibilityUnlocked:
// no problem here, just return OK
return true, nil
case gtsmodel.VisibilityFollowersOnly:
// check one-way follow
follows, err := f.db.Follows(requestingAccount, targetAccount)
if err != nil {
return false, err
}
if !follows {
l.Trace("requested status is followers only but requesting account is not a follower")
return false, nil
}
return true, nil
case gtsmodel.VisibilityMutualsOnly:
// check mutual follow
mutuals, err := f.db.Mutuals(requestingAccount, targetAccount)
if err != nil {
return false, err
}
if !mutuals {
l.Trace("requested status is mutuals only but accounts aren't mufos")
return false, nil
}
return true, nil
case gtsmodel.VisibilityDirect:
l.Trace("requesting account requests a status it's not mentioned in")
return false, nil // it's not mentioned -_-
}
return false, errors.New("reached the end of StatusVisible with no result")
}