mirror of
https://github.com/fish-shell/fish-shell
synced 2024-11-14 08:58:01 +00:00
82fed6fc2f
This concerns code like the following: while true ; sleep 100; end Here 'while' is a "simple block execution" and does not create a new job, or get a pgid. Each 'sleep' however is an external command execution, and is treated as a distinct job. (bash is the same way). So `while` and `sleep` are always in different job groups. The problem comes about if 'sleep' is cancelled through SIGINT or SIGQUIT. Prior to2a4c545b21
, if *any* process got a SIGINT or SIGQUIT, then fish would mark a global "stop executing" variable. This obviously prevents background execution of fish functions. In2a4c545b21
, this was changed so only the job's group gets marked as cancelled. However in the case of one job group spawning another, we weren't propagating the signal. This adds a signal to parse_execution_context which the parser checks after execution. It's not ideal since now we have three different places where signals can be recorded. However it fixes this regression which is too important to leave unfixed for long. Fixes #7259
25 lines
607 B
Python
25 lines
607 B
Python
#!/usr/bin/env python3
|
|
from pexpect_helper import SpawnedProc
|
|
|
|
sp = SpawnedProc()
|
|
sendline, sleep, expect_prompt, expect_str = (
|
|
sp.sendline,
|
|
sp.sleep,
|
|
sp.expect_prompt,
|
|
sp.expect_str,
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
# Ensure that if child processes SIGINT, we exit our loops.
|
|
# This is an interactive test because the parser is expected to
|
|
# recover from SIGINT in interactive mode.
|
|
# Test for #7259.
|
|
|
|
expect_prompt()
|
|
sendline("while true; sh -c 'echo Here we go; sleep .25; kill -s INT $$'; end")
|
|
sleep(0.30)
|
|
expect_str("Here we go")
|
|
expect_prompt()
|
|
|
|
sendline("echo it worked")
|
|
expect_str("it worked")
|
|
expect_prompt()
|