This test wants to generate a U+FDD2 to see it is not mishandled.
To do so, we tried to use sh, which on my system is bash and can do
`$'\ufdd2'`.
Unfortunately on other systems it might be dash, which won't do that.
Since I don't know of a good no-dependency portable way to generate
this (I dimly remember python3 being a shim on some systems, so I do
not want to invoke it here), we'll just use our own printf.
Which is a worse test, we control both parts, but it'll do.
Fixes#10134
This makes `fish -c begin` fail with a status of 127 - it already
printed a syntax error so that was weird. (127 was the status for
syntax errors when piping to fish, so we stay consistent with that)
We allow multiple `-c` commands, and this will return the regular
status if the last `-c` succeeded.
This is fundamentally an extremely weird situation but this is the
simple targeted fix - we did nothing, unsuccessfully, so we should
fail.
Things to consider in future:
1. Return something better than 127 - that's the status for "unknown
command"!
2. Fail after a `-c` failed, potentially even checking all of them
before executing the first?
Fixes#9888
(cherry picked from commit a6c36a014c)
This is the simple fix - if we have no valid digit, we have nothing to
return. So instead of returning a NULL, we return an error.
This is already the case for invalid octal escapes (like `\777`).
Fixes#8545
On request of a team member, this patches `basic.fish` to no longer
depend on being invoked by the test driver and started up in a $PWD that
points to a clean temporary directory.
Tests are now executed in a test-specific temporary directory, so test
output on failure should be reproducible/reusable as-is without needing
to have TMPDIR defined (as it only exists by default under macOS).
Aside from the fact that the shared state could cause problems, tests
were randomly assuming it would be created where that wasn't the case.
In particular, `redirect.fish` and `basic.fish` were failing on only
macOS because `../test/temp` didn't exist yet - it would be created by
other tests later.
for PWD in foo; true; end
prints:
>..src/parse_execution.cpp:461: end_execution_reason_t parse_execution_context_t::run_for_statement(const ast::for_header_t&, const ast::job_list_t&): Assertion `retval == ENV_OK' failed.
because this used the wrong way to see if something is read-only.
After commit 6dd6a57c60, 3 remaining
builtins were affected by uint8_t overflow: `exit`, `return`, and
`functions --query`.
This commit:
- Moves the overflow check from `builtin_set_query` to `builtin_run`.
- Removes a conflicting int -> uint8_t conversion in `builtin_return`.
- Adds tests for the 3 remaining affected builtins.
- Simplifies the wording for the documentation for `set --query`.
- Does not change documentation for `functions --query`, because it does
not state the exit code in its API.
- Updates the CHANGELOG to reflect the change to all builtins.
This needs to be rewritten, I'm pretty sure we have like 6 of these
kinds of ad-hoc "is this quoted" things lying around.
But for now, at least don't just check if the *previous* character was
a backslash.
Fixes#7685.
A weird interaction between grouped short options and our weird option
parsing that puts unknown options back:
```
echo "-n foo"
```
would see the `-n`, turn off printing newlines, interpret the " " as
another grouped short option, see that there is no short option for
space and put the entire token back on the arguments pile.
So it would print "-n foo" *without a newline*.
Fix this by keeping an old state of the options around and reverting
it when putting options back.
The alternative is *probably* to forbid the " " short option in
wgetopt, then check if an option group contains it and error out, but
this should only really be a problem in `echo` because that is,
AFAICT, the only thing that puts the options back.
Fixes#7614
Now command, jobs, type, abbr, builtin, functions and set take `-q` to
query for existence, but the long option is inconsistent.
The first three use `--quiet`, the latter use `--query`. Add `--query`
to the first three, but keep `--quiet` around.
Fixes#7276.
This, together with the other testX, really just tests some basic
syntax. So let's just call it "basic".
Note that this file uses escaped newlines on purpose, so restyling it
would currently break it. I'm not sure what the best thing to do here is.
