for PWD in foo; true; end
prints:
>..src/parse_execution.cpp:461: end_execution_reason_t parse_execution_context_t::run_for_statement(const ast::for_header_t&, const ast::job_list_t&): Assertion `retval == ENV_OK' failed.
because this used the wrong way to see if something is read-only.
After commit 6dd6a57c60, 3 remaining
builtins were affected by uint8_t overflow: `exit`, `return`, and
`functions --query`.
This commit:
- Moves the overflow check from `builtin_set_query` to `builtin_run`.
- Removes a conflicting int -> uint8_t conversion in `builtin_return`.
- Adds tests for the 3 remaining affected builtins.
- Simplifies the wording for the documentation for `set --query`.
- Does not change documentation for `functions --query`, because it does
not state the exit code in its API.
- Updates the CHANGELOG to reflect the change to all builtins.
This needs to be rewritten, I'm pretty sure we have like 6 of these
kinds of ad-hoc "is this quoted" things lying around.
But for now, at least don't just check if the *previous* character was
a backslash.
Fixes#7685.
A weird interaction between grouped short options and our weird option
parsing that puts unknown options back:
```
echo "-n foo"
```
would see the `-n`, turn off printing newlines, interpret the " " as
another grouped short option, see that there is no short option for
space and put the entire token back on the arguments pile.
So it would print "-n foo" *without a newline*.
Fix this by keeping an old state of the options around and reverting
it when putting options back.
The alternative is *probably* to forbid the " " short option in
wgetopt, then check if an option group contains it and error out, but
this should only really be a problem in `echo` because that is,
AFAICT, the only thing that puts the options back.
Fixes#7614
Now command, jobs, type, abbr, builtin, functions and set take `-q` to
query for existence, but the long option is inconsistent.
The first three use `--quiet`, the latter use `--query`. Add `--query`
to the first three, but keep `--quiet` around.
Fixes#7276.
This, together with the other testX, really just tests some basic
syntax. So let's just call it "basic".
Note that this file uses escaped newlines on purpose, so restyling it
would currently break it. I'm not sure what the best thing to do here is.
