Vi visual mode selection highlighting behaves unexpectedly when the selection
foreground and background in the highlight spec don't match. The following
unexpected behaviors are:
* The foreground color is not being applied when defined by the
`fish_color_selection` variable.
* `set_color` options (e.g., `--bold`) would not be applied under the cursor
when selection begins in the middle of the command line or when the cursor
moves forward after visually selecting text backward.
With this change, visual selection respects the foreground color and any
`set_color` options are applied consistently regardless of where visual
selection begins and the position of the cursor during selection.
Most of it is duplicated, hence untested.
Functions like mbrtowc are not exposed by the libc crate, so declare them
ourselves.
Since we don't know the definition of C macros, add two big hacks to make
this work:
1. Replace MB_LEN_MAX and mbstate_t with values (resp types) that should
be large enough for any implementation.
2. Detect the definition of MB_CUR_MAX in the build script. This requires
more changes for each new libc. We could also use this approach for 1.
Additionally, this commit brings a small behavior change to
read_unquoted_escape(): we cannot decode surrogate code points like \UDE01
into a Rust char, so use � (\UFFFD, replacement character) instead.
Previously, we added such code points to a wcstring; looks like they were
ignored when printed.
wcs2string converts a wide string to a narrow one. The result is
null-terminated and may also contain interior null-characters.
std::string allows this.
Rust's null-terminated string, CString, does not like interior null-characters.
This means we will need to use Vec<u8> or OsString for the places where we
use interior null-characters.
On the other hand, we want to use CString for places that require a
null-terminator, because other Rust types don't guarantee the null-terminator.
Turns out there is basically no overlap between the two use cases, so make
it two functions. Their equivalents in Rust will have the same name, so
we'll only need to adjust the type when porting.
This can be triggered on linux with:
```js
import { spawn } from 'child_process';
const shell = spawn('/home/alfa/dev/fish-shell/build-c++/fish', []);
```
Under node 19.8.1.
*No clue* how that happens, but since this is a workaround we shall
skip it.
Another from the "why are we asserting instead of doing something
sensible" department.
The alternative is to make exit() and return() compute their own exit
code, but tbh I don't want any *other* builtin to hit this either?
Fixes#9659
This shows some of the ugliness of the rust borrow checker when it comes to
safely implementing any sort of recursive access and the need to be overly
explicit about which types are actually used across threads and which aren't.
We're forced to use an `Arc` for `ItemMaker` (née `item_maker_t`) because
there's no other way to make it clear that its lifetime will last longer than
the FdMonitor's. But once we've created an `Arc<T>` we can't call
`Arc::get_mut()` to get an `&mut T` once we've created even a single weak
reference to the Arc (because that weak ref could be upgraded to a strong ref at
any time). This means we need to finish configuring any non-atomic properties
(such as `ItemMaker::always_exit`) before we initialize the callback (which
needs an `Arc<ItemMaker>` to do its thing).
Because rust doesn't like self-referential types and because of the fact that we
now need to create both the `ItemMaker` and the `FdMonitorItem` separately
before we set the callback (at which point it becomes impossible to get a
mutable reference to the `ItemMaker`), `ItemMaker::item` is dropped from the
struct and we instead have the "constructor" for `ItemMaker` take a reference to
an `FdMonitor` instance and directly add itself to the monitor's set, meaning we
don't need to move the item out of the `ItemMaker` in order to add it to the
`FdMonitor` set later.
CXX does not allow generic types like maybe_t. When porting a C++ function
that returns maybe_t to Rust, we return std::unique_ptr instead. Let's make
the transition more seamless by allowing to convert back to maybe_t implicitly.
* wutil: Rewrite `wrealpath` in Rust
* Reduce use of FFI types in `wrealpath`
* Addressed PR comments regarding allocation
* Replace let binding assignment with regular comparison
More ugliness with types that cxx bridge can't recognize as being POD. Using
pointers to get/set `termios` values with an assert to make sure we're using
identical definitions on both sides (in cpp from the system headers and in rust
from the libc crate as exported).
I don't know why cxx bridge doesn't allow `SharedPtr<OpaqueRustType>` but we can
work around it in C++ by converting a `Box<T>` to a `shared_ptr<T>` then convert
it back when it needs to be destructed. I can't find a clean way of doing it
from the cxx bridge wrapper so for now it needs to be done manually in the C++
code.
Types/values that are drop-in ready over ffi are renamed to match the old cpp
names but for types that now differ due to ffi difficulties I've left the `_ffi`
in the function names to indicate that this isn't the "correct" way of using the
types/methods.
The way cxx bridge works, it doesn't recognize any types from another module as
being shared cxx bridge types with generations native to both C++ and Rust,
meaning every module that was going to use function pointers would have to
define its own `c_void` type (because cxx bridge doesn't recognize any of
libc::c_void, std::ffi::c_void, or autocxx::c_void).
FFI on other platforms has long used the equivalent of `uint8_t *` as an
alternative to `void *` for code where `void` was not available or was
undesirable for some reason. We can join the club - this way we can always use
`* {const|mut} u8` in our rust code and `uint8_t *` in our C++ code to pass
around parameters or values over the C abi.
I needed to rename some types already ported to rust so they don't clash with
their still-extant cpp counterparts. Helper ffi functions added to avoid needing
to dynamically allocate an FdMonitorItem for every fd (we use dozens per basic
prompt).
I ported some functions from cpp to rust that are used only in the backend but
without removing their existing cpp counterparts so cpp code can continue to use
their version of them (`wperror` and `make_detached_pthread`).
I ran into issues porting line-by-line logic because rust inverts the behavior
of `std::remove_if(..)` by making it (basically) `Vec::retain_if(..)` so I
replaced bools with an explict enum to make everything clearer.
I'll port the cpp tests for this separately, for now they're using ffi.
Porting closures was ugly. It's nothing hard, but it's very ugly as now each
capturing lambda has been changed into an explicit struct that contains its
parameters (that needs to be dynamically allocated), a standalone callback
(member) function to replace the lambda contents, and a separate trampoline
function to call it from rust over the shared C abi (not really relevant to
x86_64 w/ its single calling convention but probably needed on other platforms).
I don't like that `fd_monitor.rs` has its own `c_void`. I couldn't find a way to
move that to `ffi.rs` but still get cxx bridge to consider it a shared POD.
Every time I moved it to a different module, it would consider it to be an
opaque rust type instead. I worry this means we're going to have multiple
`c_void1`, `c_void2`, etc. types as we continue to port code to use function
pointers.
Also, rust treats raw pointers as foreign so you can't do `impl Send for * const
Foo` even if `Foo` is from the same module. That necessitated a wrapper type
(`void_ptr`) that implements `Send` and `Sync` so we can move stuff between
threads.
The code in fd_monitor_t has been split into two objects, one that is used by
the caller and a separate one associated with the background thread (this is
made nice and clean by rust's ownership model). Objects not needed under the
lock (i.e. accessed by the background thread exclusively) were moved to the
separate `BackgroundFdMonitor` type.
