As spotted in #7656, macOS installer files built on Big Sur fail signature
verification on macOS 10.11. This is because Big Sur productsign no longer
supplies the SHA-1 hash, and 10.11 does not know how to read the SHA-256
hash.
Replace the productsign flow with a flow based on
http://users.wfu.edu/cottrell/productsign/productsign_linux.html . This
uses the xar tool to digitally sign the installer packages, with both
SHA-1 and SHA-256 hashes.
The xar tool is somewhat tricky to build, so is checked in (as binary!)
compiled for Mac.
To build a Mac package, run make_pkg.sh (which invokes the signing flow)
followed by mac_notarize.sh which adds the notarization.
From commit b1369a52c24336da2d2d6d5dc6707a7834065d43
This adds the "REQUIRES" directive that allows specifying
preconditions for tests, which allows us to add tests that don't have
to run on all systems.
Now, I don't want to just make all tests specific to an OS or
something, but e.g. a `git` test would be a honkin' great idea, and we
can't ask everyone to have `git`!
lint.fish receives arguments that contain multiple includes and defines.
As a result, we passed arguments like
"-I/usr/include -I$HOME/fish-shell/build -I/usr/include"
to cppcheck which interprets this as a single include directory.
This leads to errors like this one (because the "build" dir was missing):
src/common.h:4:0: information: Include file: "config.h" not found. [missingInclude]
Unfortunately the previous solution was too naive and misidentified
some errors.
In essence, passing regex-source couldn't work, because those could
not match any other line, so we have to inject regex-matching into the
SequenceMatcher.
Through awful hackery, this is possible.
Updates littlecheck to 0f6841bbc1674e89f512b5f19d1ad4e0227d2934.
This lets littlecheck "diff" the given output with the checks, leading
to easier to understand errors.
E.g. changing some random lines in andandoror.fish yields error output
like:
```
Testing file checks/andandoror.fish ... Failure:
The CHECK on line 36 wants:
if test 4 ok
which failed to match line stdout:9:
if test 3 ok
Context:
[...] from line 17 (stdout:6):
true && false || true: 0
if test 1 ok
if test 2 ok
if test 3 ok <= no check matches this, previous check on line 35
if test 4 ok
0 0 0
1 1 1
2 2 2
3 3 3 <= does not match CHECK '3 5 3' on line 55
4 4 4
0
1
[...] from line 126 (stdout:33):
0
0
0
<= nothing to match CHECK 'banana' on line 135
when running command:
../test/root/bin/fish checks/andandoror.fish
```
This updates littlecheck to b9c24a3.
This was using "/usr/local/bin/fish" for no good reason - 1. fish
might not be installed, 2. fish might not be installed *there*.
Just use /bin/sh in this case, if that doesn't exist we have bigger
problems, and this is just a simple wrapper for a command call.
[ci skip]
In #7459, asan printed error output. However, because we had a failure
on stdout already, littlecheck would only print the first unmatched
line from stderr, leading to output like
```
additional output on stderr:1:
=================================================================
```
Which is of course entirely useless.
So in that case we just let it print *all* unmatched stderr lines, so
you'd get the full asan output, which presumably is of more use.
This upgrades littlecheck to 5f7deafcea4e58dd3d369eae069a3781bb6ce75e.
Instead of using /tmp/fish as a temporary directory for this operation,
which could lead to clobbering user files, use mktemp to create an
actual temporary directory.
Ensure that the increment= param is set via keyword, not via positional arg.
This mistake was masking a bug where the "^a b c" match was not being tested,
because it was being set as the value for increment!
This switches the 'increment' param from "after" to "before." Instead
of expect_prompt saying if the next prompt will be incremented, each
call site says if it should have been incremented sinec the last prompt.
The result is just the *index* of the pattern that matched. But since
we never pass a *list* it's just always 0.
spawn.match is the MatchObject that produced the match, so it can be
used to post-process the matched output, e.g.
```python
m = expect_re('\d+')
m.group() # is now the matched number
```
Prior to this change, if we saw more than one repaint readline command in
a row, we would try to ignore the second one. However this was never the
right thing to do since sometimes we really do need to repaint twice in a
row (e.g. the user hits Ctrl+L twice). Previously we were saved by the
buginess of this mechanism but with the repainting refactoring we see
missing redraws.
Remove the coalescing logic and add a test. Fixes#7280.
I really kinda hate how insistent clang-format is to have line
breaks *IFF THE LINE IS TOO LONG*.
Like... lemme just add a break if it looks better, will you?
But it is the style at this time, so we shall tie an onion to our
belt.
This was sometimes slightly annoying in porting.
5 is enough most of the time, 10 should be enough basically always,
without being too annoying if you don't need it.
Make it easier to use pexpect and to understand its error messages.
Switch to a style in tests using bound methods, which makes them
less noisy to write.
This adds a new interactive test framework based on Python's pexpect. This
is intended to supplant the TCL expect-based tests.
New tests go in `tests/pexpects/`. As a proof-of-concept, the
pipeline.expect test and the (gnarly) bind.expect test are ported to the
new framework.
Commit b2f40783a2b5b0663409c4daa90b794b02dd37a6
This has better progress reporting, and the exit status of littlecheck
indicates how many test failures there were.
Mostly line breaks, one instance of tabs!
For some reason clang-format insists on two spaces before a same-line comment?
(I continue to be unimpressed with super-strict line length limits,
but I continue to believe in automatic styling, so it is what it is)
[ci skip]
This allows:
- Running scripts via shebang (not important here)
- Progress output (so we can ditch more of our run script)
- Context (only after, for now) - this is important if there is a test failure
It's now good enough to do so.
We don't allow grid-alignment:
```fish
complete -c foo -s b -l barnanana -a '(something)'
complete -c foo -s z -a '(something)'
```
becomes
```fish
complete -c foo -s b -l barnanana -a '(something)'
complete -c foo -s z -a '(something)'
```
It's just more trouble than it is worth.
The one part I'd change:
We align and/or'd parts of an if-condition with the in-block code:
```fish
if true
and false
dosomething
end
```
becomes
```fish
if true
and false
dosomething
end
```
but it's not used terribly much and if we ever fix it we can just
reindent.
