Consider a group of short options, like -xzPARAM, where x and z are options and z takes an argument.
This commit enables completion of the argument to the last option (z), both within the same
token (-xzP) or in the next one (-xz P).
complete -C'-xz' will complete only parameters to z.
complete -C'-xz ' will complete only parameters to z if z requires a parameter
otherwise, it will also complete non-option parameters
To do so this implements a heuristic to differentiate such strings from single long options. To
detect whether our token contains some short options, we only require the first character after the
dash (here x) to be an option. Previously, all characters had to be short options. The last option
in our example is z. Everything after the last option is assumed to be a parameter to the last
option.
Assume there is also a single long option -x-foo, then complete -C'-x' will suggest both -x-foo and
-xy. However, when the single option x requires an argument, this will not suggest -x-foo.
However, I assume this will almost never happen in practise since completions very rarely mix
short and single long options.
Fixes#332
This stops reading argument names after another option appears. It does not break any previous uses and in fact fixes uses like
```fish
function foo --argument-names bar --description baz
```
* `function` command handles options after argument names (Fixes#6186)
* Removed unneccesary test
Meaning empty variables, command substitutions that don't print
anything.
A switch without an argument
```fish
switch
case ...
end
```
is still a syntax error, and more than one argument is still a runtime
error.
The none-argument matches either an empty-string `case ''` or a
catch-all `case '*'`.
Fixes#5677.
Fixes#4943.
This test uses universal variables, and so it can fail when run
multiple times.
It might be a good idea to do this in general, but for now let's just
try it here.
Previously when propagating explicitly separated output, we would early-out
if the buffer was empty, where empty meant contains no characters. However
it may contain one or more empty strings, in which case we should propagate
those strings.
Remove this footgun "empty" function and handle this properly.
Fixes#5987
I tested this manually (`littlecheck.py -s fish=fish tests/checks/eval.fish`) from the base directory, which means I got
"tests/checks/eval", while the real test gets "checks/eval".
I then reran `make test_fishscript`, but that didn't pull in the
updated test - we should really handle that better.
I'm gonna add more tests to this and I don't want to touch the old stuff.
Notice that this needs to have the output of the complete_directories
test adjusted because this one now runs later.
That's something we should take into account in future.
This required a bit of thinking.
What we do is we have one test that fakes $HOME, and then we do the
various config tests there.
The fake config we have is reused and we exercise all of the same codepaths.
This is a bit weird sometimes, e.g. to test the return status (that
fish actually *returns $status*), we use a #RUN line with %fish
invoking %fish, so we can use the substitution.
Still much nicer.
The missing scripts are those that rely on config.
This is a nice test (ha!) for how this works and what littlecheck can
do for us.
1. Input is now the actual file, not "Standard Input" anymore. So
any errors mentioning that now include the filename.
2. Regex are really nice for filenames, but especially for line
numbers
3. It's much nicer to have the output where it's created, instead of
needing to follow three files at the same time.
This adds support for .check files inside the tests directory. .check
files are tests designed to be run with littlecheck.
Port printf test to littlecheck and remove the printf.in test.
