This adds preprocessor defines for _LARGEFILE_SOURCE and
_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 and a few others, fixing a bug that was reported on
gitter. This prevents issues when running fish on 32 bit systems that
have filesystems with 64 bit inodes.
As discussed in #9221, a bug in the autocomplete that was fixed in 66391922
caused completions to be incorrectly suppressed. The dropped test/check was
inadvertently relying on the buggy behavior and expected a git invocation to
generate no completions but there are, in fact, completions now that the bug has
been resolved.
cc @faho: I'm not sure if you want to replace this with a different check that
actually doesn't yield any completions or if you're happy with it just being
dropped.
This flag determines whether or not more shortopt switches will be offered up as
potential completions (vs only the payload for the last-parsed shortopt switch).
Previously, it was being stomped before it was determined whether or not two
`complete` rules with different `result_mode.requires_param` values were
actually resolved against the current command line or not, and the last
evaluated completion rule would win out.
There are two changes here:
* `last_option_requires_param` is only assigned if all associated conditions for
a potential completion are also met, and
* If already assigned by a conflicting rule (which can only be user/developer
error), `last_option_requires_param` is allowed to change from true to false
but not the other way around (i.e. in case of a conflict, generate both
payloads and other shortopt completions)
The first change is immediately noticeable and affects many of our own
completions, see the discussion in #9221 for an example regarding `git` where
`-c` has any of about a million different possible meanings depending on which
completion preconditions have been met. The second change should only happen if
a dev/user mistakenly enters a `complete -c ...` rule for the same shortopt more
than once, both with conditions matching, sometimes requiring an argument and
not sometimes not. It should be a rare occurence.
g++ 4.8 emits a bogus warning on code like foo{}. Add a compiler flag
-Wno-missing-field-initializers if that warning is detected, because it
is annoying.
This reverts commit 3d8f98c395.
In addition to the issues mentioned on the GitHub page for this commit,
it also broke the CentOS 7 build.
Note one can locally test the CentOS 7 build via:
./docker/docker_run_tests.sh ./docker/centos7.Dockerfile
This fails on old Ubuntu with:
> touch: invalid date format ‘190112112040.39’
Because we don't actually need the seconds here, we just use minute
resolution. It's fine.
Also use `path mtime`, because that's a portable way to get the mtime.
Be more careful with sign extension issues stemming from the differences in how
an untyped literal is promoted to an integer vs how a typed (and signed) `char`
is promoted to an integer.
Also convert some `const[expr] static xxx` to `const[expr] xxx` where it makes
sense to let the compiler deduce on its own whether or not to allocate storage
for a constant variable rather than imposing our view that it should have STATIC
storage set aside for it.
A few call sites were not making use of the `XXX_LEN` definitions and were
calling `strlen(XXX)` - these have been updated to use `const_strlen(XXX)`
instead.
I'm not sure if any toolchains will have raise any issues with these changes...
CI will tell!
The optimization takes references to strings which are stored in a vector,
and stores those references in a set; but the strings are simultaneously
being moved within the vector, which may invalidate those references.
It's probably safe if you work through which particular strings are being
moved, but as a matter of principle we shouldn't take references to elements
of a vector while the vector is being rearranged, absenet a clear improvement
on a benchmark.
This reverts commit d5561623aa.
I forgot `stat` is non-portable. There's no great way to portably get a
machine-readable representation of stat(2) for a file. I don't want to ship our
own lstat(2) wrapper executable just for this test and don't want to fork out to
python or perl for this either - I just wanted to get the tests to pass under
WSL :'(
Anyway, just give up and make it skip just for WSL. If another OS fails this
test in the future, the comments and existing workaround will make it easy to
figure out what the problem is and what needs to be done. We'll cross that
bridge when we get there.
Whenever the command line changes, we redraw it with the previously computed
syntax highlighting. At the same time we start recomputing highlighting in
a background thread.
On some systems, the highlighting computation is slow, so the stale syntax
highlighting is visible.
The stale highlighting was computed for an old commandline. When the user
had inserted or deleted some characters in the middle, then the highlighting
is wrong for the characters to the right. This is because the characters
to the right have shifted but the highlighting hasn't. Fix this by also
shifting highlighting.
This means that text that was alrady highlighted will use the same
highlighting until a new one is computed. Newly inserted text uses the color
left of the cursor.
This is implemented by giving editable_line_t ownership of the highlighting.
It is able to perfectly sync text and highlighting; they will invariably
have the same length.
Fixes#9180
While its true that we only ever call this with temporaries, there is no
fundamental reason for this restriction. Taking by value is simpler and
more flexible. I think it does not change the generated code.
No functional change.
The idea for this function was that it stands as the one place that modifies
the text without push_edit. In practice I don't think it helps.
No functional change.
In theory this does less work so we should generally use this style.
In practice it looks uglier so I'm not sure. Maybe wait for stdlib ranges...
No functional change.
It turns out that not all systems print an unsigned integer as the output of
`stat -c %Y xxx` and the leading `-` can be misinterpreted as a parameter to
`string match`.
It turns out there *is* an obviously portable way... except it's
not-so-obviously not portable after all.
POSIX specifies that sigqueue(2) can be used to validate pid and signo
separately, returning EINVAL in the specific case of an invalid or unsupported
signal number. This would be perfect... if only it were actually implemented.
It seems that the WSLv1 implementation of pselect(2) does not check for
undelivered signals after the temporary sigmask is un-applied from the thread in
question.
`gh` doesn't write its errors to stderr and doesn't exit with a non-zero status
code in case of failure. The completions are short enough that buffering them
isn't a huge deal.
There's no guarantee (nor requirement) that the filesystem support pre-epoch
modification dates. If it doesn't, the `test` tests were failing to get the
expected results.
Skip the test if it seems the fs doesn't support pre-epoch timestamps
(determined by pre-epoch mt of `oldest` evaluating to 0 or the unix epoch).
