Commit graph

25 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
ridiculousfish
15c0313c33 Fix pexpect_helper.py prompt regex
The prompt regex for pexpect was:

```
    return re.compile(
        r"""(?:\r\n?|^)   # beginning of line
            (?:\x1b[\d[KB(m]*)* # optional colors
            (?:\x1b[\?2004h) # Bracketed paste
            (?:\x1b[>4;1m) # XTerm's modifyOtherKeys
            (?:\x1b[>5u) # CSI u with kitty progressive enhancement
            (?:\x1b=) # set application keypad mode, so the keypad keys send unique codes
            (?:\[.\]\ )?  # optional vi mode prompt
         """
        + (r"prompt\ %d>" % counter)  # prompt with counter
        + r"""
            (?:\x1b[\d\[KB(m]*)* # optional colors
        """,
        re.VERBOSE,
    )
```

This has a terrible bug: an accidentally unescaped bracket here:

    (?:\x1b[>4;1m) # XTerm's modifyOtherKeys
           ^

This bracket then extends throughout the entire regex, and is
accidentally terminated here:

    (?:\x1b[\d\[KB(m]*)* # optional colors
                    ^

Thus the whole regex is busted; in particular the prompt counters are
not being tested correctly.

A second issue is that these escape sequences are not emitted before the
first prompt, so correcting the regex will cause every test to fail.

Fix this by ignoring all of the escape sequences and merely look for
the "prompt %d>" portion.

THIS DELIBERATELY CAUSES TEST FAILURES.

The tests were already broken and falsely reported as passing.
These will be fixed in followup commits.

Good news is that the tests should become way more reliable after
this is fixed - hopefully no more introducing random sleep() calls.
2024-06-02 14:07:35 -07:00
Johannes Altmanninger
64bc989e19 Drop invasive control sequences from pexpect debug output
A failing test might emit an OSC 133 prompt marking sequence, confusing
the parent terminal to think the test output contains a shell prompt. Let's
remove these.
2024-04-09 09:51:29 +02:00
Johannes Altmanninger
f285e85b0c Enable focus reporting only just before reading from stdin
Some terminals send the focus-in sequences ("^[I") whenever focus reporting is
enabled.  We enable focus reporting whenever we are finished running a command.
If we run two commands without reading in between, the focus sequences
will show up on the terminal.

Fix this by enabling focus-reporting as late as possible.

This fixes the problem with `^[I` showing up when running "cat" in
gnome-terminal https://github.com/fish-shell/fish-shell/issues/10411.

This begs the question if we should do the same for CSI u and bracketed paste.
It's difficult to answer that; let's hope we find motivating test cases.
If we enable CSI u too late, we might misinterpret key presses, so for now
we still enable those as early as possible.

Also, since we now read immediately after enabling focus events, we can get
rid of the hack where we defer enabling them until after the first prompt.
When I start a fresh terminal, the ^[I no longer shows up.
2024-04-06 11:22:19 +02:00
Johannes Altmanninger
8bf8b10f68 Extended & human-friendly keys
See the changelog additions for user-visible changes.

Since we enable/disable terminal protocols whenever we pass terminal ownership,
tests can no longer run in parallel on the same terminal.

For the same reason, readline shortcuts in the gdb REPL will not work anymore.
As a remedy, use gdbserver, or lobby for CSI u support in libreadline.

Add sleep to some tests, otherwise they fall (both in CI and locally).

There are two weird failures on FreeBSD remaining, disable them for now
https://github.com/fish-shell/fish-shell/pull/10359/checks?check_run_id=23330096362

Design and implementation borrows heavily from Kakoune.

In future, we should try to implement more of the kitty progressive
enhancements.

Closes #10359
2024-04-02 14:35:16 +02:00
Fabian Boehm
360342bb9e pexpect: Check for signalstatus being none
This would happen if e.g. the child shell did `exit 1` before an
`expect()`.
2024-03-12 22:04:23 +01:00
Fabian Boehm
8cc0bdeed8 pexpect: Remove some unnecessary empty lines
This strips the newline from "code_context" (which is really just the
called function), and from the unescaped output.

Rather, in case the output doesn't end with a newline it'll mark it
with an explicit message "(no trailing newline)".
2023-10-04 18:51:44 +02:00
Fabian Boehm
7a22dcb687 pexpect: Check if the process exited with a signal
This would have been helpful in #10044:

> signals.py:28: SIGNAL SIGSEGV from expect_prompt()

instead of "EOF".
2023-10-04 16:02:13 +02:00
Johannes Altmanninger
c6e1704f00 pexpect test for commandline --current-process
It was not clear to me hwo this behaves when there are comments.

Include a friendly helper to compute control characters.
No functional change.
2022-11-12 22:34:31 +01:00
ridiculousfish
cfbebb7201 Better support for helper functions in pexpect
When a pexpect test fails, it reports the "failing line." Prior to this
commit, it did so by walking up the Python call stack, looking for
the first frame which is not in the pexpect_helper module, and so presumably
in the test itself. However sometimes the test wants to define a helper
function; then if the test fails the helper function is reported as the
failing line, not the callsite of the helper.

Fix this by skipping functions which have the `callsite_skip` attribute set.

Nothing to relnote here.
2022-04-10 12:59:04 -07:00
ridiculousfish
e08b71592e pexpect_helper to unconditionally output to the tty
With the new test runner, pexpect_helper no longer sees a tty so wasn't
outputting the buffer. Just always do it.
2021-10-29 20:45:42 -07:00
ridiculousfish
f373e6e923 Reformat pexpect_helper.py with black 2021-10-29 20:42:59 -07:00
Fabian Homborg
23e6698dc8 cmake: Force color in the tests
For littlecheck/pexpect this just unconditionally enables color.

I have no idea what happens if you run cmake outside of a terminal
, but the worst that can happen is that *errors* have color
escapes in them.

If someone figures out how to get cmake to tell us if it's running in
a terminal, we can add a check.
2021-08-30 17:16:19 +02:00
Johannes Altmanninger
516a70d9cb Misc cleanups
Some as suggested by lgtm.com
2021-03-21 19:41:36 +01:00
Fabian Homborg
81af5b7ff3 pexpect: Allow specifying that a test should fail
I have no idea how to see that flow control has worked otherwise
2021-02-15 17:30:50 +01:00
Fabian Homborg
ccc5e7cb28 pexpect: Pass on keyword arguments to spawn()
This is useful for all the additional pexpect features.
2021-02-12 18:21:07 +01:00
Fabian Homborg
2e55e34544 Reformat 2020-11-22 14:39:48 +01:00
ridiculousfish
63cf3e972f Correct parameter order of pexpect.expect_prompt
Ensure that the increment= param is set via keyword, not via positional arg.
This mistake was masking a bug where the "^a b c" match was not being tested,
because it was being set as the value for increment!
2020-10-06 16:03:06 -07:00
ridiculousfish
9e1800cb96 Rework increment param in pexpect.expect_prompt
This switches the 'increment' param from "after" to "before." Instead
of expect_prompt saying if the next prompt will be incremented, each
call site says if it should have been incremented sinec the last prompt.
2020-10-06 14:22:35 -07:00
Fabian Homborg
04562300e8 Pexpect: Return the match object instead of the result
The result is just the *index* of the pattern that matched. But since
we never pass a *list* it's just always 0.

spawn.match is the MatchObject that produced the match, so it can be
used to post-process the matched output, e.g.

```python
m = expect_re('\d+')
m.group() # is now the matched number
```
2020-09-04 17:53:17 +02:00
ridiculousfish
47480b2dbd Remove redraw coalescing logic
Prior to this change, if we saw more than one repaint readline command in
a row, we would try to ignore the second one. However this was never the
right thing to do since sometimes we really do need to repaint twice in a
row (e.g. the user hits Ctrl+L twice). Previously we were saved by the
buginess of this mechanism but with the repainting refactoring we see
missing redraws.

Remove the coalescing logic and add a test. Fixes #7280.
2020-08-24 13:22:35 -07:00
Fabian Homborg
149a0b98af Another formatting run
I really kinda hate how insistent clang-format is to have line
breaks *IFF THE LINE IS TOO LONG*.

Like... lemme just add a break if it looks better, will you?

But it is the style at this time, so we shall tie an onion to our
belt.
2020-06-24 20:43:56 +02:00
Fabian Homborg
cfa2927610 pexpect: Show last 10 lines on failure
This was sometimes slightly annoying in porting.

5 is enough most of the time, 10 should be enough basically always,
without being too annoying if you don't need it.
2020-06-13 19:53:21 +02:00
Fabian Homborg
5478d979a0 pexpect: Consume color sequences in expect_prompt
We typically use TERM=dumb, but in some cases we need actual cursor
and color stuff.
2020-06-13 19:18:12 +02:00
ridiculousfish
4ae4314e63 Improve pexpect output
Make it easier to use pexpect and to understand its error messages.
Switch to a style in tests using bound methods, which makes them
less noisy to write.
2020-06-07 14:53:17 -07:00
ridiculousfish
3b7feb38e9 Add pexpect-based interactive testing framework
This adds a new interactive test framework based on Python's pexpect. This
is intended to supplant the TCL expect-based tests.

New tests go in `tests/pexpects/`. As a proof-of-concept, the
pipeline.expect test and the (gnarly) bind.expect test are ported to the
new framework.
2020-06-07 14:46:21 -07:00