clap/tests/groups.rs
2021-10-26 22:17:59 +01:00

320 lines
8.9 KiB
Rust

mod utils;
use clap::{App, Arg, ArgGroup, ErrorKind};
static REQ_GROUP_USAGE: &str = "error: The following required arguments were not provided:
<base|--delete>
USAGE:
clap-test <base|--delete>
For more information try --help
";
static REQ_GROUP_CONFLICT_USAGE: &str =
"error: The argument '--delete' cannot be used with '<base>'
USAGE:
clap-test <base|--delete>
For more information try --help
";
static REQ_GROUP_CONFLICT_ONLY_OPTIONS: &str =
"error: The argument '--delete' cannot be used with '--all'
USAGE:
clap-test <--all|--delete>
For more information try --help
";
#[test]
fn required_group_missing_arg() {
let result = App::new("group")
.arg("-f, --flag 'some flag'")
.arg(" -c, --color 'some other flag'")
.group(ArgGroup::new("req").args(&["flag", "color"]).required(true))
.try_get_matches_from(vec![""]);
assert!(result.is_err());
let err = result.err().unwrap();
assert_eq!(err.kind, ErrorKind::MissingRequiredArgument);
}
#[cfg(debug_assertions)]
#[test]
#[should_panic = "Argument group 'req' contains non-existent argument"]
fn non_existing_arg() {
let _ = App::new("group")
.arg("-f, --flag 'some flag'")
.arg("-c, --color 'some other flag'")
.group(ArgGroup::new("req").args(&["flg", "color"]).required(true))
.try_get_matches_from(vec![""]);
}
#[cfg(debug_assertions)]
#[test]
#[should_panic = "Argument group name must be unique\n\n\t'req' is already in use"]
fn unique_group_name() {
let _ = App::new("group")
.arg("-f, --flag 'some flag'")
.arg("-c, --color 'some other flag'")
.group(ArgGroup::new("req").args(&["flag"]).required(true))
.group(ArgGroup::new("req").args(&["color"]).required(true))
.try_get_matches_from(vec![""]);
}
#[cfg(debug_assertions)]
#[test]
#[should_panic = "Argument group name '' must not conflict with argument name"]
fn groups_new_of_arg_name() {
let _ = App::new("group")
.arg(Arg::new("a").long("a").group("a"))
.try_get_matches_from(vec!["", "--a"]);
}
#[cfg(debug_assertions)]
#[test]
#[should_panic = "Argument group name 'a' must not conflict with argument name"]
fn arg_group_new_of_arg_name() {
let _ = App::new("group")
.arg(Arg::new("a").long("a").group("a"))
.group(ArgGroup::new("a"))
.try_get_matches_from(vec!["", "--a"]);
}
#[test]
fn group_single_value() {
let res = App::new("group")
.arg("-f, --flag 'some flag'")
.arg("-c, --color [color] 'some option'")
.group(ArgGroup::new("grp").args(&["flag", "color"]))
.try_get_matches_from(vec!["", "-c", "blue"]);
assert!(res.is_ok());
let m = res.unwrap();
assert!(m.is_present("grp"));
assert_eq!(m.value_of("grp").unwrap(), "blue");
}
#[test]
fn group_single_flag() {
let res = App::new("group")
.arg("-f, --flag 'some flag'")
.arg("-c, --color [color] 'some option'")
.group(ArgGroup::new("grp").args(&["flag", "color"]))
.try_get_matches_from(vec!["", "-f"]);
assert!(res.is_ok());
let m = res.unwrap();
assert!(m.is_present("grp"));
assert!(m.value_of("grp").is_none());
}
#[test]
fn group_empty() {
let res = App::new("group")
.arg("-f, --flag 'some flag'")
.arg("-c, --color [color] 'some option'")
.group(ArgGroup::new("grp").args(&["flag", "color"]))
.try_get_matches_from(vec![""]);
assert!(res.is_ok());
let m = res.unwrap();
assert!(!m.is_present("grp"));
assert!(m.value_of("grp").is_none());
}
#[test]
fn group_reqired_flags_empty() {
let result = App::new("group")
.arg("-f, --flag 'some flag'")
.arg("-c, --color 'some option'")
.group(ArgGroup::new("grp").required(true).args(&["flag", "color"]))
.try_get_matches_from(vec![""]);
assert!(result.is_err());
let err = result.err().unwrap();
assert_eq!(err.kind, ErrorKind::MissingRequiredArgument);
}
#[test]
fn group_multi_value_single_arg() {
let res = App::new("group")
.arg("-f, --flag 'some flag'")
.arg("-c, --color [color]... 'some option'")
.group(ArgGroup::new("grp").args(&["flag", "color"]))
.try_get_matches_from(vec!["", "-c", "blue", "red", "green"]);
assert!(res.is_ok(), "{:?}", res.unwrap_err().kind);
let m = res.unwrap();
assert!(m.is_present("grp"));
assert_eq!(
&*m.values_of("grp").unwrap().collect::<Vec<_>>(),
&["blue", "red", "green"]
);
}
#[test]
fn empty_group() {
let r = App::new("empty_group")
.arg(Arg::from("-f, --flag 'some flag'"))
.group(ArgGroup::new("vers").required(true))
.try_get_matches_from(vec!["empty_prog"]);
assert!(r.is_err());
let err = r.err().unwrap();
assert_eq!(err.kind, ErrorKind::MissingRequiredArgument);
}
#[test]
fn req_group_usage_string() {
let app = App::new("req_group")
.arg("[base] 'Base commit'")
.arg("-d, --delete 'Remove the base commit information'")
.group(
ArgGroup::new("base_or_delete")
.args(&["base", "delete"])
.required(true),
);
assert!(utils::compare_output(
app,
"clap-test",
REQ_GROUP_USAGE,
true
));
}
#[test]
fn req_group_with_conflict_usage_string() {
let app = App::new("req_group")
.arg(Arg::from("[base] 'Base commit'").conflicts_with("delete"))
.arg(Arg::from(
"-d, --delete 'Remove the base commit information'",
))
.group(
ArgGroup::new("base_or_delete")
.args(&["base", "delete"])
.required(true),
);
assert!(utils::compare_output(
app,
"clap-test --delete base",
REQ_GROUP_CONFLICT_USAGE,
true
));
}
#[test]
fn req_group_with_conflict_usage_string_only_options() {
let app = App::new("req_group")
.arg(Arg::from("<all> -a --all 'All'").conflicts_with("delete"))
.arg(Arg::from(
"<delete> -d, --delete 'Remove the base commit information'",
))
.group(
ArgGroup::new("all_or_delete")
.args(&["all", "delete"])
.required(true),
);
assert!(utils::compare_output(
app,
"clap-test --delete --all",
REQ_GROUP_CONFLICT_ONLY_OPTIONS,
true
));
}
#[test]
fn required_group_multiple_args() {
let result = App::new("group")
.arg("-f, --flag 'some flag'")
.arg("-c, --color 'some other flag'")
.group(
ArgGroup::new("req")
.args(&["flag", "color"])
.required(true)
.multiple(true),
)
.try_get_matches_from(vec!["group", "-f", "-c"]);
assert!(result.is_ok());
let m = result.unwrap();
assert!(m.is_present("flag"));
assert!(m.is_present("color"));
}
#[test]
fn group_multiple_args_error() {
let result = App::new("group")
.arg("-f, --flag 'some flag'")
.arg("-c, --color 'some other flag'")
.group(ArgGroup::new("req").args(&["flag", "color"]))
.try_get_matches_from(vec!["group", "-f", "-c"]);
assert!(result.is_err());
let err = result.unwrap_err();
assert_eq!(err.kind, ErrorKind::ArgumentConflict);
}
#[test]
fn group_usage_use_val_name() {
static GROUP_USAGE_USE_VAL_NAME: &str = "prog
USAGE:
prog <A>
ARGS:
<A>
OPTIONS:
-h, --help Print help information
";
let app = App::new("prog")
.arg(Arg::new("a").value_name("A"))
.group(ArgGroup::new("group").arg("a").required(true));
assert!(utils::compare_output(
app,
"prog --help",
GROUP_USAGE_USE_VAL_NAME,
false,
));
}
#[test]
fn group_acts_like_arg() {
let result = App::new("prog")
.arg(Arg::new("debug").long("debug").group("mode"))
.arg(Arg::new("verbose").long("verbose").group("mode"))
.try_get_matches_from(vec!["prog", "--debug"]);
assert!(result.is_ok());
let m = result.unwrap();
assert!(m.is_present("mode"));
}
/* This is used to be fixed in a hack, we need to find a better way to fix it.
#[test]
fn issue_1794() {
let app = clap::App::new("hello")
.bin_name("deno")
.arg(Arg::new("option1").long("option1").takes_value(false))
.arg(Arg::new("pos1").takes_value(true))
.arg(Arg::new("pos2").takes_value(true))
.group(
ArgGroup::new("arg1")
.args(&["pos1", "option1"])
.required(true),
);
let m = app.clone().get_matches_from(&["app", "pos1", "pos2"]);
assert_eq!(m.value_of("pos1"), Some("pos1"));
assert_eq!(m.value_of("pos2"), Some("pos2"));
assert!(!m.is_present("option1"));
let m = app
.clone()
.get_matches_from(&["app", "--option1", "positional"]);
assert_eq!(m.value_of("pos1"), None);
assert_eq!(m.value_of("pos2"), Some("positional"));
assert!(m.is_present("option1"));
}
*/