mod utils; use clap::{App, Arg, ArgGroup, ErrorKind}; static REQ_GROUP_USAGE: &str = "error: The following required arguments were not provided: USAGE: clap-test For more information try --help"; static REQ_GROUP_CONFLICT_USAGE: &str = "error: The argument '' cannot be used with '--delete' USAGE: clap-test For more information try --help"; #[allow(unused)] static REQ_GROUP_CONFLICT_REV: &str = "error: The argument '--delete' cannot be used with '' USAGE: clap-test For more information try --help"; static REQ_GROUP_CONFLICT_ONLY_OPTIONS: &str = "error: Found argument '--all' which wasn't expected, or isn't valid in this context \tIf you tried to supply `--all` as a value rather than a flag, use `-- --all` USAGE: clap-test <-a|--delete> For more information try --help"; // FIXME: This message has regressed after https://github.com/clap-rs/clap/pull/1856 // Need to roll back somehow. static REQ_GROUP_CONFLICT_REV_DEGRADED: &str = "error: Found argument 'base' which wasn't expected, or isn't valid in this context USAGE: clap-test For more information try --help"; #[test] fn required_group_missing_arg() { let result = App::new("group") .arg("-f, --flag 'some flag'") .arg(" -c, --color 'some other flag'") .group(ArgGroup::new("req").args(&["flag", "color"]).required(true)) .try_get_matches_from(vec![""]); assert!(result.is_err()); let err = result.err().unwrap(); assert_eq!(err.kind, ErrorKind::MissingRequiredArgument); } #[cfg(debug_assertions)] #[test] #[should_panic = "Argument group 'req' contains non-existent argument"] fn non_existing_arg() { let _ = App::new("group") .arg("-f, --flag 'some flag'") .arg("-c, --color 'some other flag'") .group(ArgGroup::new("req").args(&["flg", "color"]).required(true)) .try_get_matches_from(vec![""]); } #[cfg(debug_assertions)] #[test] #[should_panic = "Argument group name must be unique\n\n\t'req' is already in use"] fn unique_group_name() { let _ = App::new("group") .arg("-f, --flag 'some flag'") .arg("-c, --color 'some other flag'") .group(ArgGroup::new("req").args(&["flag"]).required(true)) .group(ArgGroup::new("req").args(&["color"]).required(true)) .try_get_matches_from(vec![""]); } #[cfg(debug_assertions)] #[test] #[should_panic = "Argument group name '' must not conflict with argument name"] fn groups_new_of_arg_name() { let _ = App::new("group") .arg(Arg::new("a").long("a").group("a")) .try_get_matches_from(vec!["", "--a"]); } #[cfg(debug_assertions)] #[test] #[should_panic = "Argument group name 'a' must not conflict with argument name"] fn arg_group_new_of_arg_name() { let _ = App::new("group") .arg(Arg::new("a").long("a").group("a")) .group(ArgGroup::new("a")) .try_get_matches_from(vec!["", "--a"]); } #[test] fn group_single_value() { let res = App::new("group") .arg("-f, --flag 'some flag'") .arg("-c, --color [color] 'some option'") .group(ArgGroup::new("grp").args(&["flag", "color"])) .try_get_matches_from(vec!["", "-c", "blue"]); assert!(res.is_ok()); let m = res.unwrap(); assert!(m.is_present("grp")); assert_eq!(m.value_of("grp").unwrap(), "blue"); } #[test] fn group_single_flag() { let res = App::new("group") .arg("-f, --flag 'some flag'") .arg("-c, --color [color] 'some option'") .group(ArgGroup::new("grp").args(&["flag", "color"])) .try_get_matches_from(vec!["", "-f"]); assert!(res.is_ok()); let m = res.unwrap(); assert!(m.is_present("grp")); assert!(m.value_of("grp").is_none()); } #[test] fn group_empty() { let res = App::new("group") .arg("-f, --flag 'some flag'") .arg("-c, --color [color] 'some option'") .group(ArgGroup::new("grp").args(&["flag", "color"])) .try_get_matches_from(vec![""]); assert!(res.is_ok()); let m = res.unwrap(); assert!(!m.is_present("grp")); assert!(m.value_of("grp").is_none()); } #[test] fn group_reqired_flags_empty() { let result = App::new("group") .arg("-f, --flag 'some flag'") .arg("-c, --color 'some option'") .group(ArgGroup::new("grp").required(true).args(&["flag", "color"])) .try_get_matches_from(vec![""]); assert!(result.is_err()); let err = result.err().unwrap(); assert_eq!(err.kind, ErrorKind::MissingRequiredArgument); } #[test] fn group_multi_value_single_arg() { let res = App::new("group") .arg("-f, --flag 'some flag'") .arg("-c, --color [color]... 'some option'") .group(ArgGroup::new("grp").args(&["flag", "color"])) .try_get_matches_from(vec!["", "-c", "blue", "red", "green"]); assert!(res.is_ok(), "{:?}", res.unwrap_err().kind); let m = res.unwrap(); assert!(m.is_present("grp")); assert_eq!( &*m.values_of("grp").unwrap().collect::>(), &["blue", "red", "green"] ); } #[test] fn empty_group() { let r = App::new("empty_group") .arg(Arg::from("-f, --flag 'some flag'")) .group(ArgGroup::new("vers").required(true)) .try_get_matches_from(vec!["empty_prog"]); assert!(r.is_err()); let err = r.err().unwrap(); assert_eq!(err.kind, ErrorKind::MissingRequiredArgument); } #[test] fn req_group_usage_string() { let app = App::new("req_group") .arg("[base] 'Base commit'") .arg("-d, --delete 'Remove the base commit information'") .group( ArgGroup::new("base_or_delete") .args(&["base", "delete"]) .required(true), ); assert!(utils::compare_output( app, "clap-test", REQ_GROUP_USAGE, true )); } #[test] fn req_group_with_conflict_usage_string() { let app = App::new("req_group") .arg(Arg::from("[base] 'Base commit'").conflicts_with("delete")) .arg(Arg::from( "-d, --delete 'Remove the base commit information'", )) .group( ArgGroup::new("base_or_delete") .args(&["base", "delete"]) .required(true), ); assert!(utils::compare_output2( app, "clap-test --delete base", REQ_GROUP_CONFLICT_REV_DEGRADED, REQ_GROUP_CONFLICT_USAGE, true )); } #[test] fn req_group_with_conflict_usage_string_only_options() { let app = App::new("req_group") .arg(Arg::from(" -a, -all 'All'").conflicts_with("delete")) .arg(Arg::from( " -d, --delete 'Remove the base commit information'", )) .group( ArgGroup::new("all_or_delete") .args(&["all", "delete"]) .required(true), ); assert!(utils::compare_output2( app, "clap-test --delete --all", REQ_GROUP_CONFLICT_ONLY_OPTIONS, REQ_GROUP_CONFLICT_USAGE, true )); } #[test] fn required_group_multiple_args() { let result = App::new("group") .arg("-f, --flag 'some flag'") .arg("-c, --color 'some other flag'") .group( ArgGroup::new("req") .args(&["flag", "color"]) .required(true) .multiple(true), ) .try_get_matches_from(vec!["group", "-f", "-c"]); assert!(result.is_ok()); let m = result.unwrap(); assert!(m.is_present("flag")); assert!(m.is_present("color")); } #[test] fn group_multiple_args_error() { let result = App::new("group") .arg("-f, --flag 'some flag'") .arg("-c, --color 'some other flag'") .group(ArgGroup::new("req").args(&["flag", "color"])) .try_get_matches_from(vec!["group", "-f", "-c"]); assert!(result.is_err()); let err = result.unwrap_err(); assert_eq!(err.kind, ErrorKind::ArgumentConflict); } #[test] fn group_acts_like_arg() { let m = App::new("prog") .arg(Arg::new("debug").long("debug").group("mode")) .arg(Arg::new("verbose").long("verbose").group("mode")) .get_matches_from(vec!["prog", "--debug"]); assert!(m.is_present("mode")); } #[test] fn issue_1794() { let app = clap::App::new("hello") .bin_name("deno") .arg(Arg::new("option1").long("option1").takes_value(false)) .arg(Arg::new("pos1").takes_value(true)) .arg(Arg::new("pos2").takes_value(true)) .group( ArgGroup::new("arg1") .args(&["pos1", "option1"]) .required(true), ); let m = app.clone().get_matches_from(&["app", "pos1", "pos2"]); assert_eq!(m.value_of("pos1"), Some("pos1")); assert_eq!(m.value_of("pos2"), Some("pos2")); assert!(!m.is_present("option1")); let m = app .clone() .get_matches_from(&["app", "--option1", "positional"]); assert_eq!(m.value_of("pos1"), None); assert_eq!(m.value_of("pos2"), Some("positional")); assert!(m.is_present("option1")); }