Optional positionals mixed with subcommands will still break this, since
I can't see how to tell which element of $line is the command than.
Mixing optional positionals with subcommands is a bit weird and awkward
though...
This changes the way we complete positionals to complete them using
_arguments, as should be done, instead of completing their uppercase name
as a string.
Currently I made it offer _files completion for all positional arguments.
This can be improved to complete actual possible values of the arguments
and only complete files if the argument truly takes them. But this will
require further changes in clap to actually have the required
functionality to get this information.
Long options take their argument either in the next word or after an
equals sign, but the Zsh completion specified that they take it either
in the same word with no separator or in the next word. See the
documentation of the Zsh _arguments function for more information.
From -> To
===========================================
with_underscore -> (with_)?special_commands
WUS -> SPECIAL_CMDS
special -> special_help
SPECIAL -> SPECIAL_HELP
When used with `Arg::possible_values` it allows the argument value to pass validation even if
the case differs from that of the specified `possible_value`.
```rust
let m = App::new("pv")
.arg(Arg::with_name("option")
.long("--option")
.takes_value(true)
.possible_value("test123")
.case_insensitive(true))
.get_matches_from(vec![
"pv", "--option", "TeSt123",
]);
assert!(m.value_of("option").unwrap().eq_ignore_ascii_case("test123"));
```
This setting also works when multiple values can be defined:
```rust
let m = App::new("pv")
.arg(Arg::with_name("option")
.short("-o")
.long("--option")
.takes_value(true)
.possible_value("test123")
.possible_value("test321")
.multiple(true)
.case_insensitive(true))
.get_matches_from(vec![
"pv", "--option", "TeSt123", "teST123", "tESt321"
]);
let matched_vals = m.values_of("option").unwrap().collect::<Vec<_>>();
assert_eq!(&*matched_vals, &["TeSt123", "teST123", "tESt321"]);
```
Closes#1118
If one is using a nightly Rust compiler they should compile clap
with the `nightly` feature.
```toml
[dependencies]
clap = { version = "2.27", features = ["nightly"] }
```
This isn't required for compilation to succeed, only to take
advantage of any nightly features used by clap.
If one is compiling with `#[deny(warnings)]` this commit will cause
compilation to fail if one *does not* compile with the `nightly`
since `std::ascii::AsciiExt` is no longer required in in multiple
files as of the latest Rust nightly (Nov 6th, 2017).
Closes#1095
