Documenting the existing behavior is challenging which suggests it can
cause user confusion. So long as its not too hard to explicitly
specify actions, we should just do it.
Fixes#4057
Before we introduced actions, it required specific setups to engage with
claps version and help printing. With actions making that more
explicit, we don't get as much benefit from our multiple, obscure, ways
of users customizing help
Before
- Modify existing help or version with `mut_arg` which would
automatically be pushed down the command tree like `global(true)`
- Create an new help or version and have it treated as if it was the
built-in on (I think)
- Use the same flags as built-in and have the built-in flags
automatically disabled
- Users could explicitly disable the built-in functionality and do what
they want
Now
- `mut_arg` no longer works as we define help and version flags at the
end
- If someone defines a flag that overlaps with the built-ins by id,
long, or short, a debug assert will tell them to explicitly disable
the built-in
- Any customization has to be done by a user providing their own. To
propagate through the command tree, they need to set `global(true)`.
Benefits
- Hopefully, this makes it less confusing on how to override help
behavior. Someone creates an arg and we then tell them how to disable
the built-in
- This greatly simplifies the arg handling by pushing more
responsibility onto the developer in what are hopefully just corner
cases
- This removes about 1Kb from .text
Fixes#3405Fixes#4033
Previously the Arg id was set with the "name" attribute. This allows use
of an "id" attribute to match the underlying struct.
A side effect of this is that the "id" attribute may also be used on
Commands. This isn't desired, but given the current architecture of the
attribute parser, it's hard to avoid.
Fixes: #3785
Naming is hard. I found I was writing new code without the `s` so that
suggests the name was wrong. But we renamed `number_of_values` to
`num_args`, so should this be `ArgRange`?
TakesValue helps because it provides a way for a lot of settings to say
a value is needed without specifying how many. Multiple values didn't
have enough call sites to make this worthwhile.
This is a part of #2688
multiple_values is now just book keeping for the builder, instead people
should look to actions and `num_args`.
The meaning for it was a little weird anyways.
The only time it won't be initialized is before `_build`. This is possible because
of #4027
I wish I could just put the `expect` inside the call but I'm worried
about allowing people to build stuff on top of clap.
As we move people off takes_value/multiple_values, this will provide
something to check.
This was previously blocked on other issues related to flag handling
(#4023)
This will allow `num_args(0..=1).value_delimiter(',')` to work properly.
This hacks in support for `require_value_delimiter` until we can remove
it.
This no longer recognzes value terminators in delimited lists.
It looks like there is a bug with recognizing value terminators in
positionals arguments. We'll need to dig into that more.
In clap v3, `require_value_delimiter` activated an alternative parse
mode where
- `multiple_values` meant "multiple values within a single arg"
- `number_of_values` having no parse impact, only validation impact
- `value_names` being delimited values
For unbounded `number_of_values`, this is exactly what `value_delimiter`
provides. The only value is if someone wanted `value_name` to be
`<file1>,<file2>,...` which can be useful and we might look into adding
back in.
Alternatively, this could be used for cases like key-value pairs but
that has issues like not allowing the delimiter in the value which might
be ok in some cases but not others. We already instead document that
people should instead use `ValueParser` for this case.
In removing this, we remove points of confusion at how the different
multiple values and delimited value calls interact with each other. I
know I would set `require_value_delimiter(true).multiple_values(true)`
when it turns out all I needed was `value_delimiter(',')`.
This also reduces the API surface area which makes it easier to discover
what features we do provide.
While this isn't big, this is also yet another small step towards
reducing binary size and compile times.
