From 3a8d2a579bce8e3a1555a7e905fdd796fee591d2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ed Page <eopage@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2022 09:19:27 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] test(parser): Verify existing --flag=bad-value case

---
 tests/builder/flags.rs | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+)

diff --git a/tests/builder/flags.rs b/tests/builder/flags.rs
index e86adcdf..48c54843 100644
--- a/tests/builder/flags.rs
+++ b/tests/builder/flags.rs
@@ -136,6 +136,24 @@ fn multiple_flags_in_single() {
     assert!(*m.get_one::<bool>("debug").expect("defaulted by clap"));
 }
 
+#[test]
+#[cfg(feature = "error-context")]
+fn unexpected_value_error() {
+    const USE_FLAG_AS_ARGUMENT: &str = "\
+error: The value 'foo' was provided to '--a-flag' but it wasn't expecting any more values
+
+mycat [OPTIONS] [filename]
+
+For more information try '--help'
+";
+
+    let cmd = Command::new("mycat")
+        .arg(Arg::new("filename"))
+        .arg(Arg::new("a-flag").long("a-flag").action(ArgAction::SetTrue));
+
+    utils::assert_output(cmd, "mycat --a-flag=foo", USE_FLAG_AS_ARGUMENT, true);
+}
+
 #[test]
 #[cfg(feature = "error-context")]
 fn issue_1284_argument_in_flag_style() {