Carter Anderson 7477928f13 Use normal constructors for EasingCurve, FunctionCurve, ConstantCurve (#16367) ... # Objective We currently use special "floating" constructors for `EasingCurve`, `FunctionCurve`, and `ConstantCurve` (ex: `easing_curve`). This erases the type being created (and in general "what is happening" structurally), for very minimal ergonomics improvements. With rare exceptions, we prefer normal `X::new()` constructors over floating `x()` constructors in Bevy. I don't think this use case merits special casing here. ## Solution Add `EasingCurve::new()`, use normal constructors everywhere, and remove the floating constructors. I think this should land in 0.15 in the interest of not breaking people later.		2024-11-13 15:30:05 +00:00
..
lib.rs	Don't reëxport bevy_image from bevy_render (#16163)	2024-11-10 06:54:38 +00:00
loader.rs	Use normal constructors for EasingCurve, FunctionCurve, ConstantCurve (#16367)	2024-11-13 15:30:05 +00:00
vertex_attributes.rs	Fixed issue with derive_more Display Implementations (#16298)	2024-11-08 20:29:52 +00:00