Carter Anderson 7477928f13 Use normal constructors for EasingCurve, FunctionCurve, ConstantCurve (#16367) ... # Objective We currently use special "floating" constructors for `EasingCurve`, `FunctionCurve`, and `ConstantCurve` (ex: `easing_curve`). This erases the type being created (and in general "what is happening" structurally), for very minimal ergonomics improvements. With rare exceptions, we prefer normal `X::new()` constructors over floating `x()` constructors in Bevy. I don't think this use case merits special casing here. ## Solution Add `EasingCurve::new()`, use normal constructors everywhere, and remove the floating constructors. I think this should land in 0.15 in the interest of not breaking people later.		2024-11-13 15:30:05 +00:00
..
adaptors.rs	Bump crate-ci/typos from 1.26.8 to 1.27.0 (#16236)	2024-11-05 01:33:27 +00:00
cores.rs	Remove thiserror from bevy_math (#15769)	2024-10-09 14:23:23 +00:00
easing.rs	Use normal constructors for EasingCurve, FunctionCurve, ConstantCurve (#16367)	2024-11-13 15:30:05 +00:00
interval.rs	Remove thiserror from bevy_math (#15769)	2024-10-09 14:23:23 +00:00
iterable.rs	Curve-based animation (#15434)	2024-09-30 19:56:55 +00:00
mod.rs	Use normal constructors for EasingCurve, FunctionCurve, ConstantCurve (#16367)	2024-11-13 15:30:05 +00:00
sample_curves.rs	Fix some duplicate words in docs/comments (#15980)	2024-10-20 01:03:27 +00:00