# Objective
- Improve readability of the run condition for systems only running in a certain state
## Solution
- Rename `state_equals` to `in_state` (see [comment by cart](https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/pull/7634#issuecomment-1428740311) in #7634 )
- `.run_if(state_equals(variant))` now is `.run_if(in_state(variant))`
This breaks the naming pattern a bit with the related conditions `state_exists` and `state_exists_and_equals` but I could not think of better names for those and think the improved readability of `in_state` is worth it.
# Objective
Closes#7202
## Solution
~~Introduce a `not` helper to pipe conditions. Opened mostly for discussion. Maybe create an extension trait with `not` method? Please, advice.~~
Introduce `not(condition)` condition that inverses the result of the passed.
---
## Changelog
### Added
- `not` condition.
# Objective
Run conditions are a special type of system that do not modify the world, and which return a bool. Due to the way they are currently implemented, you can *only* use bare function systems as a run condition. Among other things, this prevents the use of system piping with run conditions. This make very basic constructs impossible, such as `my_system.run_if(my_condition.pipe(not))`.
Unblocks a basic solution for #7202.
## Solution
Add the trait `ReadOnlySystem`, which is implemented for any system whose parameters all implement `ReadOnlySystemParam`. Allow any `-> bool` system implementing this trait to be used as a run condition.
---
## Changelog
+ Added the trait `ReadOnlySystem`, which is implemented for any `System` type whose parameters all implement `ReadOnlySystemParam`.
+ Added the function `bevy::ecs::system::assert_is_read_only_system`.
