mirror of
https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy
synced 2024-12-24 20:13:07 +00:00
7 commits
| Author | SHA1 | Message | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Joona Aalto
|
25bfa80e60
|
Migrate cameras to required components (#15641)
# Objective Yet another PR for migrating stuff to required components. This time, cameras! ## Solution As per the [selected proposal](https://hackmd.io/tsYID4CGRiWxzsgawzxG_g#Combined-Proposal-1-Selected), deprecate `Camera2dBundle` and `Camera3dBundle` in favor of `Camera2d` and `Camera3d`. Adding a `Camera` without `Camera2d` or `Camera3d` now logs a warning, as suggested by Cart [on Discord](https://discord.com/channels/691052431525675048/1264881140007702558/1291506402832945273). I would personally like cameras to work a bit differently and be split into a few more components, to avoid some footguns and confusing semantics, but that is more controversial, and shouldn't block this core migration. ## Testing I ran a few 2D and 3D examples, and tried cameras with and without render graphs. --- ## Migration Guide `Camera2dBundle` and `Camera3dBundle` have been deprecated in favor of `Camera2d` and `Camera3d`. Inserting them will now also insert the other components required by them automatically. |
||
|
Joona Aalto
|
54006b107b
|
Migrate meshes and materials to required components (#15524)
# Objective A big step in the migration to required components: meshes and materials! ## Solution As per the [selected proposal](https://hackmd.io/@bevy/required_components/%2Fj9-PnF-2QKK0on1KQ29UWQ): - Deprecate `MaterialMesh2dBundle`, `MaterialMeshBundle`, and `PbrBundle`. - Add `Mesh2d` and `Mesh3d` components, which wrap a `Handle<Mesh>`. - Add `MeshMaterial2d<M: Material2d>` and `MeshMaterial3d<M: Material>`, which wrap a `Handle<M>`. - Meshes *without* a mesh material should be rendered with a default material. The existence of a material is determined by `HasMaterial2d`/`HasMaterial3d`, which is required by `MeshMaterial2d`/`MeshMaterial3d`. This gets around problems with the generics. Previously: ```rust commands.spawn(MaterialMesh2dBundle { mesh: meshes.add(Circle::new(100.0)).into(), material: materials.add(Color::srgb(7.5, 0.0, 7.5)), transform: Transform::from_translation(Vec3::new(-200., 0., 0.)), ..default() }); ``` Now: ```rust commands.spawn(( Mesh2d(meshes.add(Circle::new(100.0))), MeshMaterial2d(materials.add(Color::srgb(7.5, 0.0, 7.5))), Transform::from_translation(Vec3::new(-200., 0., 0.)), )); ``` If the mesh material is missing, previously nothing was rendered. Now, it renders a white default `ColorMaterial` in 2D and a `StandardMaterial` in 3D (this can be overridden). Below, only every other entity has a material:   Why white? This is still open for discussion, but I think white makes sense for a *default* material, while *invalid* asset handles pointing to nothing should have something like a pink material to indicate that something is broken (I don't handle that in this PR yet). This is kind of a mix of Godot and Unity: Godot just renders a white material for non-existent materials, while Unity renders nothing when no materials exist, but renders pink for invalid materials. I can also change the default material to pink if that is preferable though. ## Testing I ran some 2D and 3D examples to test if anything changed visually. I have not tested all examples or features yet however. If anyone wants to test more extensively, it would be appreciated! ## Implementation Notes - The relationship between `bevy_render` and `bevy_pbr` is weird here. `bevy_render` needs `Mesh3d` for its own systems, but `bevy_pbr` has all of the material logic, and `bevy_render` doesn't depend on it. I feel like the two crates should be refactored in some way, but I think that's out of scope for this PR. - I didn't migrate meshlets to required components yet. That can probably be done in a follow-up, as this is already a huge PR. - It is becoming increasingly clear to me that we really, *really* want to disallow raw asset handles as components. They caused me a *ton* of headache here already, and it took me a long time to find every place that queried for them or inserted them directly on entities, since there were no compiler errors for it. If we don't remove the `Component` derive, I expect raw asset handles to be a *huge* footgun for users as we transition to wrapper components, especially as handles as components have been the norm so far. I personally consider this to be a blocker for 0.15: we need to migrate to wrapper components for asset handles everywhere, and remove the `Component` derive. Also see https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/issues/14124. --- ## Migration Guide Asset handles for meshes and mesh materials must now be wrapped in the `Mesh2d` and `MeshMaterial2d` or `Mesh3d` and `MeshMaterial3d` components for 2D and 3D respectively. Raw handles as components no longer render meshes. Additionally, `MaterialMesh2dBundle`, `MaterialMeshBundle`, and `PbrBundle` have been deprecated. Instead, use the mesh and material components directly. Previously: ```rust commands.spawn(MaterialMesh2dBundle { mesh: meshes.add(Circle::new(100.0)).into(), material: materials.add(Color::srgb(7.5, 0.0, 7.5)), transform: Transform::from_translation(Vec3::new(-200., 0., 0.)), ..default() }); ``` Now: ```rust commands.spawn(( Mesh2d(meshes.add(Circle::new(100.0))), MeshMaterial2d(materials.add(Color::srgb(7.5, 0.0, 7.5))), Transform::from_translation(Vec3::new(-200., 0., 0.)), )); ``` If the mesh material is missing, a white default material is now used. Previously, nothing was rendered if the material was missing. The `WithMesh2d` and `WithMesh3d` query filter type aliases have also been removed. Simply use `With<Mesh2d>` or `With<Mesh3d>`. --------- Co-authored-by: Tim Blackbird <justthecooldude@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Carter Anderson <mcanders1@gmail.com> |
||
Clar Fon
|
efda7f3f9c
|
Simpler lint fixes: makes ci lints work but disables a lint for now (#15376)
Takes the first two commits from #15375 and adds suggestions from this comment: https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/pull/15375#issuecomment-2366968300 See #15375 for more reasoning/motivation. ## Rebasing (rerunning) ```rust git switch simpler-lint-fixes git reset --hard main cargo fmt --all -- --unstable-features --config normalize_comments=true,imports_granularity=Crate cargo fmt --all git add --update git commit --message "rustfmt" cargo clippy --workspace --all-targets --all-features --fix cargo fmt --all -- --unstable-features --config normalize_comments=true,imports_granularity=Crate cargo fmt --all git add --update git commit --message "clippy" git cherry-pick e6c0b94f6795222310fb812fa5c4512661fc7887 ``` |
||
|
Joona Aalto
|
afbbbd7335
|
Rename rendering components for improved consistency and clarity (#15035)
# Objective The names of numerous rendering components in Bevy are inconsistent and a bit confusing. Relevant names include: - `AutoExposureSettings` - `AutoExposureSettingsUniform` - `BloomSettings` - `BloomUniform` (no `Settings`) - `BloomPrefilterSettings` - `ChromaticAberration` (no `Settings`) - `ContrastAdaptiveSharpeningSettings` - `DepthOfFieldSettings` - `DepthOfFieldUniform` (no `Settings`) - `FogSettings` - `SmaaSettings`, `Fxaa`, `TemporalAntiAliasSettings` (really inconsistent??) - `ScreenSpaceAmbientOcclusionSettings` - `ScreenSpaceReflectionsSettings` - `VolumetricFogSettings` Firstly, there's a lot of inconsistency between `Foo`/`FooSettings` and `FooUniform`/`FooSettingsUniform` and whether names are abbreviated or not. Secondly, the `Settings` post-fix seems unnecessary and a bit confusing semantically, since it makes it seem like the component is mostly just auxiliary configuration instead of the core *thing* that actually enables the feature. This will be an even bigger problem once bundles like `TemporalAntiAliasBundle` are deprecated in favor of required components, as users will expect a component named `TemporalAntiAlias` (or similar), not `TemporalAntiAliasSettings`. ## Solution Drop the `Settings` post-fix from the component names, and change some names to be more consistent. - `AutoExposure` - `AutoExposureUniform` - `Bloom` - `BloomUniform` - `BloomPrefilter` - `ChromaticAberration` - `ContrastAdaptiveSharpening` - `DepthOfField` - `DepthOfFieldUniform` - `DistanceFog` - `Smaa`, `Fxaa`, `TemporalAntiAliasing` (note: we might want to change to `Taa`, see "Discussion") - `ScreenSpaceAmbientOcclusion` - `ScreenSpaceReflections` - `VolumetricFog` I kept the old names as deprecated type aliases to make migration a bit less painful for users. We should remove them after the next release. (And let me know if I should just... not add them at all) I also added some very basic docs for a few types where they were missing, like on `Fxaa` and `DepthOfField`. ## Discussion - `TemporalAntiAliasing` is still inconsistent with `Smaa` and `Fxaa`. Consensus [on Discord](https://discord.com/channels/691052431525675048/743663924229963868/1280601167209955431) seemed to be that renaming to `Taa` would probably be fine, but I think it's a bit more controversial, and it would've required renaming a lot of related types like `TemporalAntiAliasNode`, `TemporalAntiAliasBundle`, and `TemporalAntiAliasPlugin`, so I think it's better to leave to a follow-up. - I think `Fog` should probably have a more specific name like `DistanceFog` considering it seems to be distinct from `VolumetricFog`. ~~This should probably be done in a follow-up though, so I just removed the `Settings` post-fix for now.~~ (done) --- ## Migration Guide Many rendering components have been renamed for improved consistency and clarity. - `AutoExposureSettings` → `AutoExposure` - `BloomSettings` → `Bloom` - `BloomPrefilterSettings` → `BloomPrefilter` - `ContrastAdaptiveSharpeningSettings` → `ContrastAdaptiveSharpening` - `DepthOfFieldSettings` → `DepthOfField` - `FogSettings` → `DistanceFog` - `SmaaSettings` → `Smaa` - `TemporalAntiAliasSettings` → `TemporalAntiAliasing` - `ScreenSpaceAmbientOcclusionSettings` → `ScreenSpaceAmbientOcclusion` - `ScreenSpaceReflectionsSettings` → `ScreenSpaceReflections` - `VolumetricFogSettings` → `VolumetricFog` --------- Co-authored-by: Carter Anderson <mcanders1@gmail.com> |
||
Jan Hohenheim
|
d0e606b87c
|
Add an example for doing movement in fixed timesteps (#14223)
_copy-pasted from my doc comment in the code_ # Objective This example shows how to properly handle player input, advance a physics simulation in a fixed timestep, and display the results. The classic source for how and why this is done is Glenn Fiedler's article [Fix Your Timestep!](https://gafferongames.com/post/fix_your_timestep/). ## Motivation The naive way of moving a player is to just update their position like so: ```rust transform.translation += velocity; ``` The issue here is that the player's movement speed will be tied to the frame rate. Faster machines will move the player faster, and slower machines will move the player slower. In fact, you can observe this today when running some old games that did it this way on modern hardware! The player will move at a breakneck pace. The more sophisticated way is to update the player's position based on the time that has passed: ```rust transform.translation += velocity * time.delta_seconds(); ``` This way, velocity represents a speed in units per second, and the player will move at the same speed regardless of the frame rate. However, this can still be problematic if the frame rate is very low or very high. If the frame rate is very low, the player will move in large jumps. This may lead to a player moving in such large jumps that they pass through walls or other obstacles. In general, you cannot expect a physics simulation to behave nicely with *any* delta time. Ideally, we want to have some stability in what kinds of delta times we feed into our physics simulation. The solution is using a fixed timestep. This means that we advance the physics simulation by a fixed amount at a time. If the real time that passed between two frames is less than the fixed timestep, we simply don't advance the physics simulation at all. If it is more, we advance the physics simulation multiple times until we catch up. You can read more about how Bevy implements this in the documentation for [`bevy::time::Fixed`](https://docs.rs/bevy/latest/bevy/time/struct.Fixed.html). This leaves us with a last problem, however. If our physics simulation may advance zero or multiple times per frame, there may be frames in which the player's position did not need to be updated at all, and some where it is updated by a large amount that resulted from running the physics simulation multiple times. This is physically correct, but visually jarring. Imagine a player moving in a straight line, but depending on the frame rate, they may sometimes advance by a large amount and sometimes not at all. Visually, we want the player to move smoothly. This is why we need to separate the player's position in the physics simulation from the player's position in the visual representation. The visual representation can then be interpolated smoothly based on the last and current actual player position in the physics simulation. This is a tradeoff: every visual frame is now slightly lagging behind the actual physical frame, but in return, the player's movement will appear smooth. There are other ways to compute the visual representation of the player, such as extrapolation. See the [documentation of the lightyear crate](https://cbournhonesque.github.io/lightyear/book/concepts/advanced_replication/visual_interpolation.html) for a nice overview of the different methods and their tradeoffs. ## Implementation - The player's velocity is stored in a `Velocity` component. This is the speed in units per second. - The player's current position in the physics simulation is stored in a `PhysicalTranslation` component. - The player's previous position in the physics simulation is stored in a `PreviousPhysicalTranslation` component. - The player's visual representation is stored in Bevy's regular `Transform` component. - Every frame, we go through the following steps: - Advance the physics simulation by one fixed timestep in the `advance_physics` system. This is run in the `FixedUpdate` schedule, which runs before the `Update` schedule. - Update the player's visual representation in the `update_displayed_transform` system. This interpolates between the player's previous and current position in the physics simulation. - Update the player's velocity based on the player's input in the `handle_input` system. ## Relevant Issues Related to #1259. I'm also fairly sure I've seen an issue somewhere made by @alice-i-cecile about showing how to move a character correctly in a fixed timestep, but I cannot find it. |
||
Chris Biscardi
|
20eb13f458
|
Use smooth_nudge in 2d_top_down_camera example (#13907)
# Objective [`StableInterpolate`](https://dev-docs.bevyengine.org/bevy/math/trait.StableInterpolate.html) was introduced after this example was written (or more accurately, the two PRs were merged on the same day and developed in parallel). The example used `Vec3::lerp` where I believe it is now preferred to use `smooth_nudge`. ## Solution Its not entirely clear to me whether `StableInterpolate` should be preferred in this scenario, although it seems likely. So I figured a PR to make the change would either result in it being merged or denied with a reason. ## Testing ``` cargo run --example 2d_top_down_camera ``` Co-authored-by: François Mockers <mockersf@gmail.com> |
||
Julian
|
33dff0d3f7
|
2D top-down camera example (#12720)
# Objective This PR addresses the 2D part of #12658. I plan to separate the examples and make one PR per camera example. ## Solution Added a new top-down example composed of: - [x] Player keyboard movements - [x] UI for keyboard instructions - [x] Colors and bloom effect to see the movement of the player - [x] Camera smooth movement towards the player (lerp) ## Testing ```bash cargo run --features="wayland,bevy/dynamic_linking" --example 2d_top_down_camera ``` https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/assets/10638479/95db0587-e5e0-4f55-be11-97444b795793 |