Commit graph

14 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Carter Anderson
7c3131a761
Bump Version after Release (#9106)
CI-capable version of #9086

---------

Co-authored-by: Bevy Auto Releaser <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: François <mockersf@gmail.com>
2023-07-10 21:19:27 +00:00
Carter Anderson
8ba9571eed
Release 0.11.0 (#9080)
I created this manually as Github didn't want to run CI for the
workflow-generated PR. I'm guessing we didn't hit this in previous
releases because we used bors.

Co-authored-by: Bevy Auto Releaser <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
2023-07-09 08:43:47 +00:00
github-actions[bot]
6898351348
chore: Release (#7920)
Co-authored-by: Bevy Auto Releaser <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
2023-03-06 05:13:36 +00:00
github-actions[bot]
b44af49200 Release 0.10.0 (#7919)
Preparing next release
This PR has been auto-generated
2023-03-06 03:53:02 +00:00
github-actions[bot]
8eb67932f1 Bump Version after Release (#7918)
Bump version after release
This PR has been auto-generated
2023-03-06 02:10:30 +00:00
github-actions[bot]
920543c824 Release 0.9.0 (#6568)
Preparing next release
This PR has been auto-generated
2022-11-12 20:01:29 +00:00
Nicola Papale
6c5403cf47 Add warning when a hierarchy component is missing (#5590)
# Objective

A common pitfall since 0.8 is the requirement on `ComputedVisibility`
being present on all ancestors of an entity that itself has
`ComputedVisibility`, without which, the entity becomes invisible.

I myself hit the issue and got very confused, and saw a few people hit
it as well, so it makes sense to provide a hint of what to do when such
a situation is encountered.

- Fixes #5849
- Closes #5616
- Closes #2277 
- Closes #5081

## Solution

We now check that all entities with both a `Parent` and a
`ComputedVisibility` component have parents that themselves have a
`ComputedVisibility` component.

Note that the warning is only printed once.

We also add a similar warning to `GlobalTransform`.

This only emits a warning. Because sometimes it could be an intended
behavior.

Alternatives:
- Do nothing and keep repeating to newcomers how to avoid recurring
  pitfalls
- Make the transform and visibility propagation tolerant to missing
  components (#5616)
- Probably archetype invariants, though the current draft would not
  allow detecting that kind of errors

---

## Changelog

- Add a warning when encountering dubious component hierarchy structure


Co-authored-by: Nicola Papale <nicopap@users.noreply.github.com>
2022-09-19 16:12:11 +00:00
github-actions[bot]
444150025d Bump Version after Release (#5576)
Bump version after release
This PR has been auto-generated
2022-08-05 02:03:05 +00:00
github-actions[bot]
856588ed7c Release 0.8.0 (#5490)
Preparing next release
This PR has been auto-generated
2022-07-30 14:07:30 +00:00
Yutao Yuan
8d67832dfa Bump Bevy to 0.8.0-dev (#4505)
# Objective

We should bump our version to 0.8.0-dev after releasing 0.7.0, according to our release checklist.

## Solution

Do it.
2022-04-17 23:04:52 +00:00
Carter Anderson
83c6ffb73c release 0.7.0 (#4487) 2022-04-15 18:05:37 +00:00
François
d37cde8f1a fix feature location from #3851 (#4477)
# Objective

- in #3851, a feature for tracing was added to bevy_transform
- usage of that feature was moved to bevy_hierarchy, but the feature was not updated

## Solution

- add the feature to bevy_hierarchy, remove it from bevy_transform
2022-04-14 21:16:03 +00:00
Alice Cecile
7ce3ae43e3 Bump Bevy to 0.7.0-dev (#4230)
# Objective

- The [dev docs](https://dev-docs.bevyengine.org/bevy/index.html#) show version 0.6.0, which is actively misleading.

[Image of the problem](https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/695741366520512563/953513612943704114/Screenshot_20220316-154100_Firefox-01.jpeg)

Noticed by @ickk, fix proposed by @mockersf.

## Solution

- Bump the version across all Bevy crates to 0.7.0 dev.
- Set a reminder in the Release Checklist to remember to do this each release.
2022-03-19 03:54:15 +00:00
Alice Cecile
a304fd9a99 Split bevy_hierarchy out from bevy_transform (#4168)
# Objective

- Hierarchy tools are not just used for `Transform`: they are also used for scenes.
- In the future there's interest in using them for other features, such as visiibility inheritance.
- The fact that these tools are found in `bevy_transform` causes a great deal of user and developer confusion
- Fixes #2758.

## Solution

- Split `bevy_transform` into two!
- Make everything work again.

Note that this is a very tightly scoped PR: I *know* there are code quality and docs issues that existed in bevy_transform that I've just moved around. We should fix those in a seperate PR and try to merge this ASAP to reduce the bitrot involved in splitting an entire crate.

## Frustrations

The API around `GlobalTransform` is a mess: we have massive code and docs duplication, no link between the two types and no clear way to extend this to other forms of inheritance.

In the medium-term, I feel pretty strongly that `GlobalTransform` should be replaced by something like `Inherited<Transform>`, which lives in `bevy_hierarchy`:

- avoids code duplication
- makes the inheritance pattern extensible
- links the types at the type-level
- allows us to remove all references to inheritance from `bevy_transform`, making it more useful as a standalone crate and cleaning up its docs

## Additional context

- double-blessed by @cart in https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/issues/4141#issuecomment-1063592414 and https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/issues/2758#issuecomment-913810963
- preparation for more advanced / cleaner hierarchy tools: go read https://github.com/bevyengine/rfcs/pull/53 !
- originally attempted by @finegeometer in #2789. It was a great idea, just needed more discussion!

Co-authored-by: Carter Anderson <mcanders1@gmail.com>
2022-03-15 01:54:05 +00:00