Commit graph

8 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Zachary Harrold
d70595b667
Add core and alloc over std Lints (#15281)
# Objective

- Fixes #6370
- Closes #6581

## Solution

- Added the following lints to the workspace:
  - `std_instead_of_core`
  - `std_instead_of_alloc`
  - `alloc_instead_of_core`
- Used `cargo +nightly fmt` with [item level use
formatting](https://rust-lang.github.io/rustfmt/?version=v1.6.0&search=#Item%5C%3A)
to split all `use` statements into single items.
- Used `cargo clippy --workspace --all-targets --all-features --fix
--allow-dirty` to _attempt_ to resolve the new linting issues, and
intervened where the lint was unable to resolve the issue automatically
(usually due to needing an `extern crate alloc;` statement in a crate
root).
- Manually removed certain uses of `std` where negative feature gating
prevented `--all-features` from finding the offending uses.
- Used `cargo +nightly fmt` with [crate level use
formatting](https://rust-lang.github.io/rustfmt/?version=v1.6.0&search=#Crate%5C%3A)
to re-merge all `use` statements matching Bevy's previous styling.
- Manually fixed cases where the `fmt` tool could not re-merge `use`
statements due to conditional compilation attributes.

## Testing

- Ran CI locally

## Migration Guide

The MSRV is now 1.81. Please update to this version or higher.

## Notes

- This is a _massive_ change to try and push through, which is why I've
outlined the semi-automatic steps I used to create this PR, in case this
fails and someone else tries again in the future.
- Making this change has no impact on user code, but does mean Bevy
contributors will be warned to use `core` and `alloc` instead of `std`
where possible.
- This lint is a critical first step towards investigating `no_std`
options for Bevy.

---------

Co-authored-by: François Mockers <francois.mockers@vleue.com>
2024-09-27 00:59:59 +00:00
Gino Valente
245d03a78a
bevy_reflect: Update on_unimplemented attributes (#15110)
# Objective

Some of the new compile error messages are a little unclear (at least to
me). For example:

```
error[E0277]: `tests::foo::Bar` can not be created through reflection
   --> crates/bevy_reflect/src/lib.rs:679:18
    |
679 |         #[derive(Reflect)]
    |                  ^^^^^^^ the trait `from_reflect::FromReflect` is not implemented for `tests::foo::Bar`
    |
    = note: consider annotating `tests::foo::Bar` with `#[derive(Reflect)]` or `#[derive(FromReflect)]`
```

While the annotation makes it clear that `FromReflect` is missing, it's
not very clear from the main error message.

My IDE lists errors with only their message immediately present:

<p align="center">
<img width="700" alt="Image of said IDE listing errors with only their
message immediately present. These errors are as follows:
\"`tests::foo::Bar` can not be created through reflection\", \"The trait
bound `tests::foo::Bar: RegisterForReflection` is not satisfied\", and
\"The trait bound `tests::foo::Bar: type_info::MaybeTyped` is not
satisfied\""
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/42c24051-9e8e-4555-8477-51a9407446aa">
</p>

This makes it hard to tell at a glance why my code isn't compiling.

## Solution

Updated all `on_unimplemented` attributes in `bevy_reflect` to mention
the relevant trait—either the actual trait or the one users actually
need to implement—as well as a small snippet of what not implementing
them means.

For example, failing to implement `TypePath` now mentions missing a
`TypePath` implementation. And failing to implement `DynamicTypePath`
now also mentions missing a `TypePath` implementation, since that's the
actual trait users need to implement (i.e. they shouldn't implement
`DynamicTypePath` directly).

Lastly, I also added some missing `on_unimplemented` attributes for
`MaybeTyped` and `RegisterForReflection` (which you can see in the image
above).

Here's how this looks in my IDE now:

<p align="center">
<img width="700" alt="Similar image as before showing the errors listed
by the IDE. This time the errors read as follows: \"`tests::foo::Bar`
does not implement `FromReflect` so cannot be reified through
reflection\", \"`tests::foo::Bar` does not implement
`GetTypeRegistration` so cannot be registered for reflection\", and
\"`tests::foo::Bar` does not implement `Typed` so cannot provide static
type information\""
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/f6f8501f-0450-4f78-b84f-00e7a18d0533">
</p>


## Testing

You can test by adding the following code and verifying the compile
errors are correct:

```rust
#[derive(Reflect)]
struct Foo(Bar);

struct Bar;
```
2024-09-09 16:26:17 +00:00
radiish
6ab8767d3b
reflect: implement the unique reflect rfc (#7207)
# Objective

- Implements the [Unique Reflect
RFC](https://github.com/nicopap/rfcs/blob/bevy-reflect-api/rfcs/56-better-reflect.md).

## Solution

- Implements the RFC.
- This implementation differs in some ways from the RFC:
- In the RFC, it was suggested `Reflect: Any` but `PartialReflect:
?Any`. During initial implementation I tried this, but we assume the
`PartialReflect: 'static` in a lot of places and the changes required
crept out of the scope of this PR.
- `PartialReflect::try_into_reflect` originally returned `Option<Box<dyn
Reflect>>` but i changed this to `Result<Box<dyn Reflect>, Box<dyn
PartialReflect>>` since the method takes by value and otherwise there
would be no way to recover the type. `as_full` and `as_full_mut` both
still return `Option<&(mut) dyn Reflect>`.

---

## Changelog

- Added `PartialReflect`.
- `Reflect` is now a subtrait of `PartialReflect`.
- Moved most methods on `Reflect` to the new `PartialReflect`.
- Added `PartialReflect::{as_partial_reflect, as_partial_reflect_mut,
into_partial_reflect}`.
- Added `PartialReflect::{try_as_reflect, try_as_reflect_mut,
try_into_reflect}`.
- Added `<dyn PartialReflect>::{try_downcast_ref, try_downcast_mut,
try_downcast, try_take}` supplementing the methods on `dyn Reflect`.

## Migration Guide

- Most instances of `dyn Reflect` should be changed to `dyn
PartialReflect` which is less restrictive, however trait bounds should
generally stay as `T: Reflect`.
- The new `PartialReflect::{as_partial_reflect, as_partial_reflect_mut,
into_partial_reflect, try_as_reflect, try_as_reflect_mut,
try_into_reflect}` methods as well as `Reflect::{as_reflect,
as_reflect_mut, into_reflect}` will need to be implemented for manual
implementors of `Reflect`.

## Future Work

- This PR is designed to be followed up by another "Unique Reflect Phase
2" that addresses the following points:
- Investigate making serialization revolve around `Reflect` instead of
`PartialReflect`.
- [Remove the `try_*` methods on `dyn PartialReflect` since they are
stop
gaps](https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/pull/7207#discussion_r1083476050).
- Investigate usages like `ReflectComponent`. In the places they
currently use `PartialReflect`, should they be changed to use `Reflect`?
- Merging this opens the door to lots of reflection features we haven't
been able to implement.
- We could re-add [the `Reflectable`
trait](8e3488c880/crates/bevy_reflect/src/reflect.rs (L337-L342))
and make `FromReflect` a requirement to improve [`FromReflect`
ergonomics](https://github.com/bevyengine/rfcs/pull/59). This is
currently not possible because dynamic types cannot sensibly be
`FromReflect`.
  - Since this is an alternative to #5772, #5781 would be made cleaner.

---------

Co-authored-by: Alice Cecile <alice.i.cecile@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Gino Valente <49806985+MrGVSV@users.noreply.github.com>
2024-08-12 17:01:41 +00:00
Gino Valente
aa241672e1
bevy_reflect: Nested TypeInfo getters (#13321)
# Objective

Right now, `TypeInfo` can be accessed directly from a type using either
`Typed::type_info` or `Reflect::get_represented_type_info`.

However, once that `TypeInfo` is accessed, any nested types must be
accessed via the `TypeRegistry`.

```rust
#[derive(Reflect)]
struct Foo {
  bar: usize
}

let registry = TypeRegistry::default();

let TypeInfo::Struct(type_info) = Foo::type_info() else {
  panic!("expected struct info");
};

let field = type_info.field("bar").unwrap();

let field_info = registry.get_type_info(field.type_id()).unwrap();
assert!(field_info.is::<usize>());;
```

## Solution

Enable nested types within a `TypeInfo` to be retrieved directly.

```rust
#[derive(Reflect)]
struct Foo {
  bar: usize
}

let TypeInfo::Struct(type_info) = Foo::type_info() else {
  panic!("expected struct info");
};

let field = type_info.field("bar").unwrap();

let field_info = field.type_info().unwrap();
assert!(field_info.is::<usize>());;
```

The particular implementation was chosen for two reasons.

Firstly, we can't just store `TypeInfo` inside another `TypeInfo`
directly. This is because some types are recursive and would result in a
deadlock when trying to create the `TypeInfo` (i.e. it has to create the
`TypeInfo` before it can use it, but it also needs the `TypeInfo` before
it can create it). Therefore, we must instead store the function so it
can be retrieved lazily.

I had considered also using a `OnceLock` or something to lazily cache
the info, but I figured we can look into optimizations later. The API
should remain the same with or without the `OnceLock`.

Secondly, a new wrapper trait had to be introduced: `MaybeTyped`. Like
`RegisterForReflection`, this trait is `#[doc(hidden)]` and only exists
so that we can properly handle dynamic type fields without requiring
them to implement `Typed`. We don't want dynamic types to implement
`Typed` due to the fact that it would make the return type
`Option<&'static TypeInfo>` for all types even though only the dynamic
types ever need to return `None` (see #6971 for details).

Users should never have to interact with this trait as it has a blanket
impl for all `Typed` types. And `Typed` is automatically implemented
when deriving `Reflect` (as it is required).

The one downside is we do need to return `Option<&'static TypeInfo>`
from all these new methods so that we can handle the dynamic cases. If
we didn't have to, we'd be able to get rid of the `Option` entirely. But
I think that's an okay tradeoff for this one part of the API, and keeps
the other APIs intact.

## Testing

This PR contains tests to verify everything works as expected. You can
test locally by running:

```
cargo test --package bevy_reflect
```

---

## Changelog

### Public Changes

- Added `ArrayInfo::item_info` method
- Added `NamedField::type_info` method
- Added `UnnamedField::type_info` method
- Added `ListInfo::item_info` method
- Added `MapInfo::key_info` method
- Added `MapInfo::value_info` method
- All active fields now have a `Typed` bound (remember that this is
automatically satisfied for all types that derive `Reflect`)

### Internal Changes

- Added `MaybeTyped` trait

## Migration Guide

All active fields for reflected types (including lists, maps, tuples,
etc.), must implement `Typed`. For the majority of users this won't have
any visible impact.

However, users implementing `Reflect` manually may need to update their
types to implement `Typed` if they weren't already.

Additionally, custom dynamic types will need to implement the new hidden
`MaybeTyped` trait.
2024-07-15 00:40:07 +00:00
Alice Cecile
ec7b3490f6
Add on_unimplemented Diagnostics to Most Public Traits (#13347) (#13662)
# Objective

- #13414 did not have the intended effect.
- #13404 is still blocked

## Solution

- Re-adds #13347.

Co-authored-by: Zachary Harrold <zac@harrold.com.au>
Co-authored-by: Jamie Ridding <Themayu@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: BD103 <59022059+BD103@users.noreply.github.com>
2024-06-04 00:31:34 +00:00
Alice Cecile
ee6dfd35c9
Revert "Add on_unimplemented Diagnostics to Most Public Traits" (#13413)
# Objective

- Rust 1.78 breaks all Android support, see
https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/issues/13331
- We should not bump the MSRV to 1.78 until that's resolved in #13366.

## Solution

- Temporarily revert https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/pull/13347

Co-authored-by: Alice Cecile <alice.i.cecil@gmail.com>
2024-05-17 17:00:43 +00:00
Zachary Harrold
11f0a2dcde
Add on_unimplemented Diagnostics to Most Public Traits (#13347)
# Objective

- Fixes #12377

## Solution

Added simple `#[diagnostic::on_unimplemented(...)]` attributes to some
critical public traits providing a more approachable initial error
message. Where appropriate, a `note` is added indicating that a `derive`
macro is available.

## Examples

<details>
<summary>Examples hidden for brevity</summary>

Below is a collection of examples showing the new error messages
produced by this change. In general, messages will start with a more
Bevy-centric error message (e.g., _`MyComponent` is not a `Component`_),
and a note directing the user to an available derive macro where
appropriate.

### Missing `#[derive(Resource)]`

<details>
<summary>Example Code</summary>

```rust
use bevy::prelude::*;

struct MyResource;

fn main() {
    App::new()
        .insert_resource(MyResource)
        .run();
}
```

</details>

<details>
<summary>Error Generated</summary>

```error
error[E0277]: `MyResource` is not a `Resource`
   --> examples/app/empty.rs:7:26
    |
7   |         .insert_resource(MyResource)
    |          --------------- ^^^^^^^^^^ invalid `Resource`
    |          |
    |          required by a bound introduced by this call
    |
    = help: the trait `Resource` is not implemented for `MyResource`       
    = note: consider annotating `MyResource` with `#[derive(Resource)]`    
    = help: the following other types implement trait `Resource`:
              AccessibilityRequested
              ManageAccessibilityUpdates
              bevy::bevy_a11y::Focus
              DiagnosticsStore
              FrameCount
              bevy::prelude::State<S>
              SystemInfo
              bevy::prelude::Axis<T>
            and 141 others
note: required by a bound in `bevy::prelude::App::insert_resource`
   --> C:\Users\Zac\Documents\GitHub\bevy\crates\bevy_app\src\app.rs:419:31
    |
419 |     pub fn insert_resource<R: Resource>(&mut self, resource: R) -> &mut Self {
    |                               ^^^^^^^^ required by this bound in `App::insert_resource`
```

</details>

### Putting A `QueryData` in a `QueryFilter` Slot

<details>
<summary>Example Code</summary>

```rust
use bevy::prelude::*;

#[derive(Component)]
struct A;

#[derive(Component)]
struct B;

fn my_system(_query: Query<&A, &B>) {}

fn main() {
    App::new()
        .add_systems(Update, my_system)
        .run();
}
```

</details>

<details>
<summary>Error Generated</summary>

```error
error[E0277]: `&B` is not a valid `Query` filter
   --> examples/app/empty.rs:9:22
    |
9   | fn my_system(_query: Query<&A, &B>) {}
    |                      ^^^^^^^^^^^^^ invalid `Query` filter
    |
    = help: the trait `QueryFilter` is not implemented for `&B`
    = help: the following other types implement trait `QueryFilter`:
              With<T>
              Without<T>
              bevy::prelude::Or<()>
              bevy::prelude::Or<(F0,)>
              bevy::prelude::Or<(F0, F1)>
              bevy::prelude::Or<(F0, F1, F2)>
              bevy::prelude::Or<(F0, F1, F2, F3)>
              bevy::prelude::Or<(F0, F1, F2, F3, F4)>
            and 28 others
note: required by a bound in `bevy::prelude::Query`
   --> C:\Users\Zac\Documents\GitHub\bevy\crates\bevy_ecs\src\system\query.rs:349:51
    |
349 | pub struct Query<'world, 'state, D: QueryData, F: QueryFilter = ()> {
    |                                                   ^^^^^^^^^^^ required by this bound in `Query`
```

</details>

### Missing `#[derive(Component)]`

<details>
<summary>Example Code</summary>

```rust
use bevy::prelude::*;

struct A;

fn my_system(mut commands: Commands) {
    commands.spawn(A);
}

fn main() {
    App::new()
        .add_systems(Startup, my_system)
        .run();
}
```

</details>

<details>
<summary>Error Generated</summary>

```error
error[E0277]: `A` is not a `Bundle`
   --> examples/app/empty.rs:6:20
    |
6   |     commands.spawn(A);
    |              ----- ^ invalid `Bundle`
    |              |
    |              required by a bound introduced by this call
    |
    = help: the trait `bevy::prelude::Component` is not implemented for `A`, which is required by `A: Bundle`
    = note: consider annotating `A` with `#[derive(Component)]` or `#[derive(Bundle)]`
    = help: the following other types implement trait `Bundle`:
              TransformBundle
              SceneBundle
              DynamicSceneBundle
              AudioSourceBundle<Source>
              SpriteBundle
              SpriteSheetBundle
              Text2dBundle
              MaterialMesh2dBundle<M>
            and 34 others
    = note: required for `A` to implement `Bundle`
note: required by a bound in `bevy::prelude::Commands::<'w, 's>::spawn`
   --> C:\Users\Zac\Documents\GitHub\bevy\crates\bevy_ecs\src\system\commands\mod.rs:243:21
    |
243 |     pub fn spawn<T: Bundle>(&mut self, bundle: T) -> EntityCommands {
    |                     ^^^^^^ required by this bound in `Commands::<'w, 's>::spawn`
```

</details>

### Missing `#[derive(Asset)]`

<details>
<summary>Example Code</summary>

```rust
use bevy::prelude::*;

struct A;

fn main() {
    App::new()
        .init_asset::<A>()
        .run();
}
```

</details>

<details>
<summary>Error Generated</summary>

```error
error[E0277]: `A` is not an `Asset`
   --> examples/app/empty.rs:7:23
    |
7   |         .init_asset::<A>()
    |          ----------   ^ invalid `Asset`
    |          |
    |          required by a bound introduced by this call
    |
    = help: the trait `Asset` is not implemented for `A`
    = note: consider annotating `A` with `#[derive(Asset)]`
    = help: the following other types implement trait `Asset`:
              Font
              AnimationGraph
              DynamicScene
              Scene
              AudioSource
              Pitch
              bevy::bevy_gltf::Gltf
              GltfNode
            and 17 others
note: required by a bound in `init_asset`
   --> C:\Users\Zac\Documents\GitHub\bevy\crates\bevy_asset\src\lib.rs:307:22
    |
307 |     fn init_asset<A: Asset>(&mut self) -> &mut Self;
    |                      ^^^^^ required by this bound in `AssetApp::init_asset`
```

</details>

### Mismatched Input and Output on System Piping

<details>
<summary>Example Code</summary>

```rust
use bevy::prelude::*;

fn producer() -> u32 {
    123
}

fn consumer(_: In<u16>) {}

fn main() {
    App::new()
        .add_systems(Update, producer.pipe(consumer))
        .run();
}
```

</details>

<details>
<summary>Error Generated</summary>

```error
error[E0277]: `fn(bevy::prelude::In<u16>) {consumer}` is not a valid system with input `u32` and output `_`
   --> examples/app/empty.rs:11:44
    |
11  |         .add_systems(Update, producer.pipe(consumer))
    |                                       ---- ^^^^^^^^ invalid system
    |                                       |
    |                                       required by a bound introduced by this call
    |
    = help: the trait `bevy::prelude::IntoSystem<u32, _, _>` is not implemented for fn item `fn(bevy::prelude::In<u16>) {consumer}`
    = note: expecting a system which consumes `u32` and produces `_`
note: required by a bound in `pipe`
   --> C:\Users\Zac\Documents\GitHub\bevy\crates\bevy_ecs\src\system\mod.rs:168:12
    |
166 |     fn pipe<B, Final, MarkerB>(self, system: B) -> PipeSystem<Self::System, B::System>
    |        ---- required by a bound in this associated function
167 |     where
168 |         B: IntoSystem<Out, Final, MarkerB>,
    |            ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ required by this bound in `IntoSystem::pipe`
```

</details>

### Missing Reflection

<details>
<summary>Example Code</summary>

```rust
use bevy::prelude::*;

#[derive(Component)]
struct MyComponent;

fn main() {
    App::new()
        .register_type::<MyComponent>()
        .run();
}
```

</details>

<details>
<summary>Error Generated</summary>

```error
error[E0277]: `MyComponent` does not provide type registration information
   --> examples/app/empty.rs:8:26
    |
8   |         .register_type::<MyComponent>()
    |          -------------   ^^^^^^^^^^^ the trait `GetTypeRegistration` is not implemented for `MyComponent`
    |          |
    |          required by a bound introduced by this call
    |
    = note: consider annotating `MyComponent` with `#[derive(Reflect)]`
    = help: the following other types implement trait `GetTypeRegistration`:
              bool
              char
              isize
              i8
              i16
              i32
              i64
              i128
            and 443 others
note: required by a bound in `bevy::prelude::App::register_type`
   --> C:\Users\Zac\Documents\GitHub\bevy\crates\bevy_app\src\app.rs:619:29
    |
619 |     pub fn register_type<T: bevy_reflect::GetTypeRegistration>(&mut self) -> &mut Self {
    |                             ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ required by this bound in `App::register_type`
```

</details>

### Missing `#[derive(States)]` Implementation

<details>
<summary>Example Code</summary>

```rust
use bevy::prelude::*;

#[derive(Debug, Clone, Copy, Default, Eq, PartialEq, Hash)]
enum AppState {
    #[default]
    Menu,
    InGame {
        paused: bool,
        turbo: bool,
    },
}

fn main() {
    App::new()
        .init_state::<AppState>()
        .run();
}
```

</details>

<details>
<summary>Error Generated</summary>

```error
error[E0277]: the trait bound `AppState: FreelyMutableState` is not satisfied
   --> examples/app/empty.rs:15:23
    |
15  |         .init_state::<AppState>()
    |          ----------   ^^^^^^^^ the trait `FreelyMutableState` is not implemented for `AppState`
    |          |
    |          required by a bound introduced by this call
    |
    = note: consider annotating `AppState` with `#[derive(States)]`
note: required by a bound in `bevy::prelude::App::init_state`
   --> C:\Users\Zac\Documents\GitHub\bevy\crates\bevy_app\src\app.rs:282:26
    |
282 |     pub fn init_state<S: FreelyMutableState + FromWorld>(&mut self) -> &mut Self {
    |                          ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ required by this bound in `App::init_state`
```

</details>

### Adding a `System` with Unhandled Output

<details>
<summary>Example Code</summary>

```rust
use bevy::prelude::*;

fn producer() -> u32 {
    123
}

fn main() {
    App::new()
        .add_systems(Update, consumer)
        .run();
}
```

</details>

<details>
<summary>Error Generated</summary>

```error
error[E0277]: `fn() -> u32 {producer}` does not describe a valid system configuration
   --> examples/app/empty.rs:9:30
    |
9   |         .add_systems(Update, producer)
    |          -----------         ^^^^^^^^ invalid system configuration
    |          |
    |          required by a bound introduced by this call
    |
    = help: the trait `IntoSystem<(), (), _>` is not implemented for fn item `fn() -> u32 {producer}`, which is required by `fn() -> u32 {producer}: IntoSystemConfigs<_>`
    = help: the following other types implement trait `IntoSystemConfigs<Marker>`:
              <Box<(dyn bevy::prelude::System<In = (), Out = ()> + 'static)> as IntoSystemConfigs<()>>
              <NodeConfigs<Box<(dyn bevy::prelude::System<In = (), Out = ()> + 'static)>> as IntoSystemConfigs<()>>
              <(S0,) as IntoSystemConfigs<(SystemConfigTupleMarker, P0)>>
              <(S0, S1) as IntoSystemConfigs<(SystemConfigTupleMarker, P0, P1)>>
              <(S0, S1, S2) as IntoSystemConfigs<(SystemConfigTupleMarker, P0, P1, P2)>>
              <(S0, S1, S2, S3) as IntoSystemConfigs<(SystemConfigTupleMarker, P0, P1, P2, P3)>>
              <(S0, S1, S2, S3, S4) as IntoSystemConfigs<(SystemConfigTupleMarker, P0, P1, P2, P3, P4)>>
              <(S0, S1, S2, S3, S4, S5) as IntoSystemConfigs<(SystemConfigTupleMarker, P0, P1, P2, P3, P4, P5)>>
            and 14 others
    = note: required for `fn() -> u32 {producer}` to implement `IntoSystemConfigs<_>`
note: required by a bound in `bevy::prelude::App::add_systems`
   --> C:\Users\Zac\Documents\GitHub\bevy\crates\bevy_app\src\app.rs:342:23
    |
339 |     pub fn add_systems<M>(
    |            ----------- required by a bound in this associated function
...
342 |         systems: impl IntoSystemConfigs<M>,
    |                       ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ required by this bound in `App::add_systems`
```

</details>
</details>

## Testing

CI passed locally.

## Migration Guide

Upgrade to version 1.78 (or higher) of Rust.

## Future Work

- Currently, hints are not supported in this diagnostic. Ideally,
suggestions like _"consider using ..."_ would be in a hint rather than a
note, but that is the best option for now.
- System chaining and other `all_tuples!(...)`-based traits have bad
error messages due to the slightly different error message format.

---------

Co-authored-by: Jamie Ridding <Themayu@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Alice Cecile <alice.i.cecile@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: BD103 <59022059+BD103@users.noreply.github.com>
2024-05-17 00:49:05 +00:00
BD103
bdb4899978
Move compile fail tests (#13196)
# Objective

- Follow-up of #13184 :)
- We use `ui_test` to test compiler errors for our custom macros.
- There are four crates related to compile fail tests
- `bevy_ecs_compile_fail_tests`, `bevy_macros_compile_fail_tests`, and
`bevy_reflect_compile_fail_tests`, which actually test the macros.
-
[`bevy_compile_test_utils`](64c1c65783/crates/bevy_compile_test_utils),
which provides helpers and common patterns for these tests.
- All of these crates reside within the `crates` directory.
- This can be confusing, especially for newcomers. All of the other
folders in `crates` are actual published libraries, except for these 4.

## Solution

- Move all compile fail tests to a `compile_fail` folder under their
corresponding crate.
- E.g. `crates/bevy_ecs_compile_fail_tests` would be moved to
`crates/bevy_ecs/compile_fail`.
- Move `bevy_compile_test_utils` to `tools/compile_fail_utils`.

There are a few benefits to this approach:

1. An internal testing detail is less intrusive (and confusing) for
those who just want to browse the public Bevy interface.
2. Follows a pre-existing approach of organizing related crates inside a
larger crate's folder.
   - See `bevy_gizmos/macros` for an example.
4. Makes consistent the terms `compile_test`, `compile_fail`, and
`compile_fail_test` in code. It's all just `compile_fail` now, because
we are specifically testing the error messages on compiler failures.
- To be clear it can still be referred to by these terms in comments and
speech, just the names of the crates and the CI command are now
consistent.

## Testing

Run the compile fail CI command:

```shell
cargo run -p ci -- compile-fail
```

If it still passes, then my refactor was successful.
2024-05-03 13:35:21 +00:00