# Objective
- Progress towards #15918
- Add test on UI
## Solution
- Get a single screenshot from the UI testbed example
- Remove older examples from runs in CI as they're covered by the
testbed to reduce CI duration
# Objective
- Progress towards #15918
- Add tests for 3d
## Solution
- Add tests that cover lights, bloom, gltf and animation
- Removed examples `contributors` and `load_gltf` as they don't
contribute additional checks to CI
## Testing
- `CI_TESTING_CONFIG=.github/example-run/testbed_3d.ron cargo run
--example testbed_3d --features "bevy_ci_testing"`
# Objective
- Make progress for #15918
- Start with 2d
## Solution
- Remove screenshots for existing examples as they're not deterministic
- Create new "testbed" example category, with a 2d one to start
## Testing
- Run `CI_TESTING_CONFIG=.github/example-run/testbed_2d.ron cargo run
--example testbed_2d --features "bevy_ci_testing"`
- ???
- Check the screenshots
Progress towards https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/issues/7386.
Following discussion
https://discord.com/channels/691052431525675048/1253260494538539048/1253387942311886960
This Pull Request adds an example to detect system order ambiguities,
and also asserts none exist.
A lot of schedules are ignored in ordered to have the test passing, we
should thrive to make them pass, but in other pull requests.
<details><summary>example output <b>summary</b>, without ignored
schedules</summary>
<p>
```txt
$ cargo run --example ambiguity_detection 2>&1 | grep -C 1 "pairs of syst"
2024-06-21T13:17:55.776585Z WARN bevy_ecs::schedule::schedule: Schedule First has ambiguities.
1 pairs of systems with conflicting data access have indeterminate execution order. Consider adding `before`, `after`, or `ambiguous_with` relationships between these:
-- bevy_time::time_system (in set TimeSystem) and bevy_ecs::event::event_update_system (in set EventUpdates)
--
2024-06-21T13:17:55.782265Z WARN bevy_ecs::schedule::schedule: Schedule PreUpdate has ambiguities.
11 pairs of systems with conflicting data access have indeterminate execution order. Consider adding `before`, `after`, or `ambiguous_with` relationships between these:
-- bevy_pbr::prepass::update_mesh_previous_global_transforms and bevy_asset::server::handle_internal_asset_events
--
2024-06-21T13:17:55.809516Z WARN bevy_ecs::schedule::schedule: Schedule PostUpdate has ambiguities.
63 pairs of systems with conflicting data access have indeterminate execution order. Consider adding `before`, `after`, or `ambiguous_with` relationships between these:
-- bevy_ui::accessibility::image_changed and bevy_ecs::schedule::executor::apply_deferred
--
2024-06-21T13:17:55.816287Z WARN bevy_ecs::schedule::schedule: Schedule Last has ambiguities.
3 pairs of systems with conflicting data access have indeterminate execution order. Consider adding `before`, `after`, or `ambiguous_with` relationships between these:
-- bevy_gizmos::update_gizmo_meshes<bevy_gizmos::aabb::AabbGizmoConfigGroup> (in set UpdateGizmoMeshes) and bevy_gizmos::update_gizmo_meshes<bevy_gizmos::light::LightGizmoConfigGroup> (in set UpdateGizmoMeshes)
--
2024-06-21T13:17:55.831074Z WARN bevy_ecs::schedule::schedule: Schedule ExtractSchedule has ambiguities.
296 pairs of systems with conflicting data access have indeterminate execution order. Consider adding `before`, `after`, or `ambiguous_with` relationships between these:
-- bevy_render::extract_component::extract_components<bevy_sprite::SpriteSource> and bevy_render::render_asset::extract_render_asset<bevy_sprite::mesh2d::material::PreparedMaterial2d<bevy_sprite::mesh2d::color_material::ColorMaterial>>
```
</p>
</details>
To try locally:
```sh
CI_TESTING_CONFIG="./.github/example-run/ambiguity_detection.ron" cargo run --example ambiguity_detection --features "bevy_ci_testing,trace,trace_chrome"
```
---------
Co-authored-by: Jan Hohenheim <jan@hohenheim.ch>
# Objective
- Current config file is hard to extend
## Solution
- Instead of an hard coded list of field, the file now has a list of
`(frame, event)`, and will deal with know events (exiting or taking a
screenshot), or send an event for others that can be dealt by third
party plugins
~~Currently blocked on an upstream bug that causes crashes when
minimizing/resizing on dx12 https://github.com/gfx-rs/wgpu/issues/3967~~
wgpu 0.17.1 is out which fixes it
# Objective
Keep wgpu up to date.
## Solution
Update wgpu and naga_oil.
Currently this depends on an unreleased (and unmerged) branch of
naga_oil, and hasn't been properly tested yet.
The wgpu side of this seems to have been an extremely trivial upgrade
(all the upgrade work seems to be in naga_oil). This also lets us remove
the workarounds for pack/unpack4x8unorm in the SSAO shaders.
Lets us close the dx12 part of
https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/issues/8888
related: https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/issues/9304
---
## Changelog
Update to wgpu 0.17 and naga_oil 0.9
# Objective
- I want to take screenshots of examples in CI to help with validation
of changes
## Solution
- Can override how much time is updated per frame
- Can specify on which frame to take a screenshots
- Save screenshots in CI
I reused the `TimeUpdateStrategy::ManualDuration` to be able to set the
time update strategy to a fixed duration every frame. Its previous
meaning didn't make much sense to me. This change makes it possible to
have screenshots that are exactly the same across runs.
If this gets merged, I'll add visual comparison of screenshots between
runs to ensure nothing gets broken
## Migration Guide
* `TimeUpdateStrategy::ManualDuration` meaning has changed. Instead of
setting time to `Instant::now()` plus the given duration, it sets time
to last update plus the given duration.
# Objective
- Reduce confusion as the example opens a window and isn't truly "headless"
- Fixes https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/issues/5260.
## Solution
- Rename the example and add to the docs that the window is expected.
# Objective
We keep getting issues where things break at small window sizes, e.g #3368 (caused by #3153), #3596 ('caused' by #3545)
## Solution
- Add a test that we can make small windows.
Currently, this fails on my machine with some quite scary vulkan errors:
```
2022-01-08T22:55:13.770261Z ERROR wgpu_hal::vulkan::instance: VALIDATION [VUID-VkSwapchainCreateInfoKHR-imageExtent-01274 (0x7cd0911d)]
Validation Error: [ VUID-VkSwapchainCreateInfoKHR-imageExtent-01274 ] Object 0: handle = 0x1adbd410a60, type = VK_OBJECT_TYPE_DEVICE; | MessageID = 0x7cd0911d | vkCreateSwapchainKHR() called with imageExtent = (225,60), which is outside the bounds returned by vkGetPhysicalDeviceSurfaceCapabilitiesKHR(): currentExtent = (225,56), minImageExtent = (225,56), maxImageExtent = (225,56). The Vulkan spec states: imageExtent must be between minImageExtent and maxImageExtent, inclusive, where minImageExtent and maxImageExtent are members of the VkSurfaceCapabilitiesKHR structure returned by vkGetPhysicalDeviceSurfaceCapabilitiesKHR for the surface (https://vulkan.lunarg.com/doc/view/1.2.198.1/windows/1.2-extensions/vkspec.html#VUID-VkSwapchainCreateInfoKHR-imageExtent-01274)
2022-01-08T22:55:13.770808Z ERROR wgpu_hal::vulkan::instance: objects: (type: DEVICE, hndl: 0x1adbd410a60, name: ?)
2022-01-08T22:55:13.787403Z ERROR wgpu_hal::vulkan::instance: VALIDATION [VUID-VkSwapchainCreateInfoKHR-imageExtent-01274 (0x7cd0911d)]
Validation Error: [ VUID-VkSwapchainCreateInfoKHR-imageExtent-01274 ] Object 0: handle = 0x1adbd410a60, type = VK_OBJECT_TYPE_DEVICE; | MessageID = 0x7cd0911d | vkCreateSwapchainKHR() called with imageExtent = (225,56), which is outside the bounds returned by vkGetPhysicalDeviceSurfaceCapabilitiesKHR(): currentExtent = (225,52), minImageExtent = (225,52), maxImageExtent = (225,52). The Vulkan spec states: imageExtent must be between minImageExtent and maxImageExtent, inclusive, where minImageExtent and maxImageExtent are members of the VkSurfaceCapabilitiesKHR structure returned by vkGetPhysicalDeviceSurfaceCapabilitiesKHR for the surface (https://vulkan.lunarg.com/doc/view/1.2.198.1/windows/1.2-extensions/vkspec.html#VUID-VkSwapchainCreateInfoKHR-imageExtent-01274)
```
etc.
This might be a new issue here, although I'm surprised it's vulkan giving this error; wgpu should stop it if this is illegal.
# Objective
- fixes#3344
- have example run faster
## Solution
- thanks to the nice folks at wgpu, I was able to switch from swift shader to lavapipe which is faster
- I also reduced the runtime for some of the examples
- I enabled the trace_chrome feature on the examples, and stored the results as an artefact. it can be useful to debug
- runtime is back to around 10 minutes
Co-authored-by: François <8672791+mockersf@users.noreply.github.com>
From suggestion from Godot workflows: https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/issues/1730#issuecomment-810321110
* Add a feature `bevy_debug` that will make Bevy read a debug config file to setup some debug systems
* Currently, only one that will exit after x frames
* Could add option to dump screen to image file once that's possible
* Add a job in CI workflow that will run a few examples using [`swiftshader`](https://github.com/google/swiftshader)
* This job takes around 13 minutes, so doesn't add to global CI duration
|example|number of frames|duration|
|-|-|-|
|`alien_cake_addict`|300|1:50|
|`breakout`|1800|0:44|
|`contributors`|1800|0:43|
|`load_gltf`|300|2:37|
|`scene`|1800|0:44|
