builds on top of #4780
# Objective
`Reflect` and `Serialize` are currently very tied together because `Reflect` has a `fn serialize(&self) -> Option<Serializable<'_>>` method. Because of that, we can either implement `Reflect` for types like `Option<T>` with `T: Serialize` and have `fn serialize` be implemented, or without the bound but having `fn serialize` return `None`.
By separating `ReflectSerialize` into a separate type (like how it already is for `ReflectDeserialize`, `ReflectDefault`), we could separately `.register::<Option<T>>()` and `.register_data::<Option<T>, ReflectSerialize>()` only if the type `T: Serialize`.
This PR does not change the registration but allows it to be changed in a future PR.
## Solution
- add the type
```rust
struct ReflectSerialize { .. }
impl<T: Reflect + Serialize> FromType<T> for ReflectSerialize { .. }
```
- remove `#[reflect(Serialize)]` special casing.
- when serializing reflect value types, look for `ReflectSerialize` in the `TypeRegistry` instead of calling `value.serialize()`
# Objective
Make it easier to build and use an asset path with `format!()`. This can be useful for accessing assets in a loop.
Enabled by this PR:
```rust
let monkey_handle = asset_server.get_handle(&format!("models/monkey/Monkey.gltf#Mesh0/Primitive0"));
let monkey_handle = asset_server.get_handle(format!("models/monkey/Monkey.gltf#Mesh0/Primitive0"));
```
Before this PR:
```rust
let monkey_handle = asset_server.get_handle(format!("models/monkey/Monkey.gltf#Mesh0/Primitive0").as_str());
```
It's just a tiny improvement in ergonomics, but i ran into it and was wondering why the function does not accept a `String` and Bevy is all about simplicity/ergonomics, right? 😄😉
## Solution
Implement `Into<HandleId>` for `String` and `&String`.
# Objective
- New clippy lints with rust 1.57 are failing
## Solution
- Fixed clippy lints following suggestions
- I ignored clippy in old renderer because there was many and it will be removed soon
