mirror of
https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy
synced 2024-12-25 20:43:07 +00:00
3 commits
| Author | SHA1 | Message | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Tim
|
d2a07f9f72
|
Retained Gizmos (#15473)
# Objective Add a way to use the gizmo API in a retained manner, for increased performance. ## Solution - Move gizmo API from `Gizmos` to `GizmoBuffer`, ~ab~using `Deref` to keep usage the same as before. - Merge non-strip and strip variant of `LineGizmo` into one, storing the data in a `GizmoBuffer` to have the same API for retained `LineGizmo`s. ### Review guide - The meat of the changes are in `lib.rs`, `retained.rs`, `gizmos.rs`, `pipeline_3d.rs` and `pipeline_2d.rs` - The other files contain almost exclusively the churn from moving the gizmo API from `Gizmos` to `GizmoBuffer` ## Testing ### Performance Performance compared to the immediate mode API is from 65 to 80 times better for static lines. ``` 7900 XTX, 3700X 1707.9k lines/ms: gizmos_retained (21.3ms) 3488.5k lines/ms: gizmos_retained_continuous_polyline (31.3ms) 0.5k lines/ms: gizmos_retained_separate (97.7ms) 3054.9k lines/ms: bevy_polyline_retained_nan (16.8ms) 3596.3k lines/ms: bevy_polyline_retained_continuous_polyline (14.2ms) 0.6k lines/ms: bevy_polyline_retained_separate (78.9ms) 26.9k lines/ms: gizmos_immediate (14.9ms) 43.8k lines/ms: gizmos_immediate_continuous_polyline (18.3ms) ``` Looks like performance is good enough, being close to par with `bevy_polyline`. Benchmarks can be found here: This branch: https://github.com/tim-blackbird/line_racing/tree/retained-gizmos Bevy 0.14: https://github.com/DGriffin91/line_racing ## Showcase ```rust fn setup( mut commands: Commands, mut gizmo_assets: ResMut<Assets<GizmoAsset>> ) { let mut gizmo = GizmoAsset::default(); // A sphere made out of one million lines! gizmo .sphere(default(), 1., CRIMSON) .resolution(1_000_000 / 3); commands.spawn(Gizmo { handle: gizmo_assets.add(gizmo), ..default() }); } ``` ## Follow-up work - Port over to the retained rendering world proper - Calculate visibility and cull `Gizmo`s |
||
Ricky Taylor
|
9b9d3d81cb
|
Normalise matrix naming (#13489)
# Objective - Fixes #10909 - Fixes #8492 ## Solution - Name all matrices `x_from_y`, for example `world_from_view`. ## Testing - I've tested most of the 3D examples. The `lighting` example particularly should hit a lot of the changes and appears to run fine. --- ## Changelog - Renamed matrices across the engine to follow a `y_from_x` naming, making the space conversion more obvious. ## Migration Guide - `Frustum`'s `from_view_projection`, `from_view_projection_custom_far` and `from_view_projection_no_far` were renamed to `from_clip_from_world`, `from_clip_from_world_custom_far` and `from_clip_from_world_no_far`. - `ComputedCameraValues::projection_matrix` was renamed to `clip_from_view`. - `CameraProjection::get_projection_matrix` was renamed to `get_clip_from_view` (this affects implementations on `Projection`, `PerspectiveProjection` and `OrthographicProjection`). - `ViewRangefinder3d::from_view_matrix` was renamed to `from_world_from_view`. - `PreviousViewData`'s members were renamed to `view_from_world` and `clip_from_world`. - `ExtractedView`'s `projection`, `transform` and `view_projection` were renamed to `clip_from_view`, `world_from_view` and `clip_from_world`. - `ViewUniform`'s `view_proj`, `unjittered_view_proj`, `inverse_view_proj`, `view`, `inverse_view`, `projection` and `inverse_projection` were renamed to `clip_from_world`, `unjittered_clip_from_world`, `world_from_clip`, `world_from_view`, `view_from_world`, `clip_from_view` and `view_from_clip`. - `GpuDirectionalCascade::view_projection` was renamed to `clip_from_world`. - `MeshTransforms`' `transform` and `previous_transform` were renamed to `world_from_local` and `previous_world_from_local`. - `MeshUniform`'s `transform`, `previous_transform`, `inverse_transpose_model_a` and `inverse_transpose_model_b` were renamed to `world_from_local`, `previous_world_from_local`, `local_from_world_transpose_a` and `local_from_world_transpose_b` (the `Mesh` type in WGSL mirrors this, however `transform` and `previous_transform` were named `model` and `previous_model`). - `Mesh2dTransforms::transform` was renamed to `world_from_local`. - `Mesh2dUniform`'s `transform`, `inverse_transpose_model_a` and `inverse_transpose_model_b` were renamed to `world_from_local`, `local_from_world_transpose_a` and `local_from_world_transpose_b` (the `Mesh2d` type in WGSL mirrors this). - In WGSL, in `bevy_pbr::mesh_functions`, `get_model_matrix` and `get_previous_model_matrix` were renamed to `get_world_from_local` and `get_previous_world_from_local`. - In WGSL, `bevy_sprite::mesh2d_functions::get_model_matrix` was renamed to `get_world_from_local`. |
||
Lynn
|
27215b79b0
|
Gizmo line joints (#12252)
# Objective - Adds gizmo line joints, suggestion of #9400 ## Solution - Adds `line_joints: GizmoLineJoint` to `GizmoConfig`. Currently the following values are supported: - `GizmoLineJoint::None`: does not draw line joints, same behaviour as previously - `GizmoLineJoint::Bevel`: draws a single triangle between the lines - `GizmoLineJoint::Miter` / 'spiky joints': draws two triangles between the lines extending them until they meet at a (miter) point. - NOTE: for very small angles between the lines, which happens frequently in 3d, the miter point will be very far away from the point at which the lines meet. - `GizmoLineJoint::Round(resolution)`: Draw a circle arc between the lines. The circle is a triangle fan of `resolution` triangles. --- ## Changelog - Added `GizmoLineJoint`, use that in `GizmoConfig` and added necessary pipelines and draw commands. - Added a new `line_joints.wgsl` shader containing three vertex shaders `vertex_bevel`, `vertex_miter` and `vertex_round` as well as a basic `fragment` shader. ## Migration Guide Any manually created `GizmoConfig`s must now set the `.line_joints` field. ## Known issues - The way we currently create basic closed shapes like rectangles, circles, triangles or really any closed 2d shape means that one of the corners will not be drawn with joints, although that would probably be expected. (see the triangle in the 2d image) - This could be somewhat mitigated by introducing line caps or fixed by adding another segment overlapping the first of the strip. (Maybe in a followup PR?) - 3d shapes can look 'off' with line joints (especially bevel) because wherever 3 or more lines meet one of them may stick out beyond the joint drawn between the other 2. - Adding additional lines so that there is a joint between every line at a corner would fix this but would probably be too computationally expensive. - Miter joints are 'unreasonably long' for very small angles between the lines (the angle is the angle between the lines in screen space). This is technically correct but distracting and does not feel right, especially in 3d contexts. I think limiting the length of the miter to the point at which the lines meet might be a good idea. - The joints may be drawn with a different gizmo in-between them and their corresponding lines in 2d. Some sort of z-ordering would probably be good here, but I believe this may be out of scope for this PR. ## Additional information Some pretty images :) <img width="1175" alt="Screenshot 2024-03-02 at 04 53 50" src="https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/assets/62256001/58df7e63-9376-4430-8871-32adba0cb53b"> - Note that the top vertex does not have a joint drawn. <img width="1440" alt="Screenshot 2024-03-02 at 05 03 55" src="https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/assets/62256001/137a00cf-cbd4-48c2-a46f-4b47492d4fd9"> Now for a weird video: https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/assets/62256001/93026f48-f1d6-46fe-9163-5ab548a3fce4 - The black lines shooting out from the cube are miter joints that get very long because the lines between which they are drawn are (almost) collinear in screen space. --------- Co-authored-by: Pablo Reinhardt <126117294+pablo-lua@users.noreply.github.com> |