Commit graph

13 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Carter Anderson
747b0c69b0 Better Materials: AsBindGroup trait and derive, simpler Material trait (#5053)
# Objective

This PR reworks Bevy's Material system, making the user experience of defining Materials _much_ nicer. Bevy's previous material system leaves a lot to be desired:
* Materials require manually implementing the `RenderAsset` trait, which involves manually generating the bind group, handling gpu buffer data transfer, looking up image textures, etc. Even the simplest single-texture material involves writing ~80 unnecessary lines of code. This was never the long term plan.
* There are two material traits, which is confusing, hard to document, and often redundant: `Material` and `SpecializedMaterial`. `Material` implicitly implements `SpecializedMaterial`, and `SpecializedMaterial` is used in most high level apis to support both use cases. Most users shouldn't need to think about specialization at all (I consider it a "power-user tool"), so the fact that `SpecializedMaterial` is front-and-center in our apis is a miss.
* Implementing either material trait involves a lot of "type soup". The "prepared asset" parameter is particularly heinous: `&<Self as RenderAsset>::PreparedAsset`. Defining vertex and fragment shaders is also more verbose than it needs to be. 

## Solution

Say hello to the new `Material` system:

```rust
#[derive(AsBindGroup, TypeUuid, Debug, Clone)]
#[uuid = "f690fdae-d598-45ab-8225-97e2a3f056e0"]
pub struct CoolMaterial {
    #[uniform(0)]
    color: Color,
    #[texture(1)]
    #[sampler(2)]
    color_texture: Handle<Image>,
}
impl Material for CoolMaterial {
    fn fragment_shader() -> ShaderRef {
        "cool_material.wgsl".into()
    }
}
```

Thats it! This same material would have required [~80 lines of complicated "type heavy" code](https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/blob/v0.7.0/examples/shader/shader_material.rs) in the old Material system. Now it is just 14 lines of simple, readable code.

This is thanks to a new consolidated `Material` trait and the new `AsBindGroup` trait / derive.

### The new `Material` trait

The old "split" `Material` and `SpecializedMaterial` traits have been removed in favor of a new consolidated `Material` trait. All of the functions on the trait are optional.

The difficulty of implementing `Material` has been reduced by simplifying dataflow and removing type complexity:

```rust
// Old
impl Material for CustomMaterial {
    fn fragment_shader(asset_server: &AssetServer) -> Option<Handle<Shader>> {
        Some(asset_server.load("custom_material.wgsl"))
    }

    fn alpha_mode(render_asset: &<Self as RenderAsset>::PreparedAsset) -> AlphaMode {
        render_asset.alpha_mode
    }
}

// New
impl Material for CustomMaterial {
    fn fragment_shader() -> ShaderRef {
        "custom_material.wgsl".into()
    }

    fn alpha_mode(&self) -> AlphaMode {
        self.alpha_mode
    }
}
```

Specialization is still supported, but it is hidden by default under the `specialize()` function (more on this later).

### The `AsBindGroup` trait / derive

The `Material` trait now requires the `AsBindGroup` derive. This can be implemented manually relatively easily, but deriving it will almost always be preferable. 

Field attributes like `uniform` and `texture` are used to define which fields should be bindings,
what their binding type is, and what index they should be bound at:

```rust
#[derive(AsBindGroup)]
struct CoolMaterial {
    #[uniform(0)]
    color: Color,
    #[texture(1)]
    #[sampler(2)]
    color_texture: Handle<Image>,
}
```

In WGSL shaders, the binding looks like this:

```wgsl
struct CoolMaterial {
    color: vec4<f32>;
};

[[group(1), binding(0)]]
var<uniform> material: CoolMaterial;
[[group(1), binding(1)]]
var color_texture: texture_2d<f32>;
[[group(1), binding(2)]]
var color_sampler: sampler;
```

Note that the "group" index is determined by the usage context. It is not defined in `AsBindGroup`. Bevy material bind groups are bound to group 1.

The following field-level attributes are supported:
* `uniform(BINDING_INDEX)`
    * The field will be converted to a shader-compatible type using the `ShaderType` trait, written to a `Buffer`, and bound as a uniform. It can also be derived for custom structs.
* `texture(BINDING_INDEX)`
    * This field's `Handle<Image>` will be used to look up the matching `Texture` gpu resource, which will be bound as a texture in shaders. The field will be assumed to implement `Into<Option<Handle<Image>>>`. In practice, most fields should be a `Handle<Image>` or `Option<Handle<Image>>`. If the value of an `Option<Handle<Image>>` is `None`, the new `FallbackImage` resource will be used instead. This attribute can be used in conjunction with a `sampler` binding attribute (with a different binding index).
* `sampler(BINDING_INDEX)`
    * Behaves exactly like the `texture` attribute, but sets the Image's sampler binding instead of the texture. 

Note that fields without field-level binding attributes will be ignored.
```rust
#[derive(AsBindGroup)]
struct CoolMaterial {
    #[uniform(0)]
    color: Color,
    this_field_is_ignored: String,
}
```

As mentioned above, `Option<Handle<Image>>` is also supported:
```rust
#[derive(AsBindGroup)]
struct CoolMaterial {
    #[uniform(0)]
    color: Color,
    #[texture(1)]
    #[sampler(2)]
    color_texture: Option<Handle<Image>>,
}
```
This is useful if you want a texture to be optional. When the value is `None`, the `FallbackImage` will be used for the binding instead, which defaults to "pure white".

Field uniforms with the same binding index will be combined into a single binding:
```rust
#[derive(AsBindGroup)]
struct CoolMaterial {
    #[uniform(0)]
    color: Color,
    #[uniform(0)]
    roughness: f32,
}
```

In WGSL shaders, the binding would look like this:
```wgsl
struct CoolMaterial {
    color: vec4<f32>;
    roughness: f32;
};

[[group(1), binding(0)]]
var<uniform> material: CoolMaterial;
```

Some less common scenarios will require "struct-level" attributes. These are the currently supported struct-level attributes:
* `uniform(BINDING_INDEX, ConvertedShaderType)`
    * Similar to the field-level `uniform` attribute, but instead the entire `AsBindGroup` value is converted to `ConvertedShaderType`, which must implement `ShaderType`. This is useful if more complicated conversion logic is required.
* `bind_group_data(DataType)`
    * The `AsBindGroup` type will be converted to some `DataType` using `Into<DataType>` and stored as `AsBindGroup::Data` as part of the `AsBindGroup::as_bind_group` call. This is useful if data needs to be stored alongside the generated bind group, such as a unique identifier for a material's bind group. The most common use case for this attribute is "shader pipeline specialization".

The previous `CoolMaterial` example illustrating "combining multiple field-level uniform attributes with the same binding index" can
also be equivalently represented with a single struct-level uniform attribute:
```rust
#[derive(AsBindGroup)]
#[uniform(0, CoolMaterialUniform)]
struct CoolMaterial {
    color: Color,
    roughness: f32,
}

#[derive(ShaderType)]
struct CoolMaterialUniform {
    color: Color,
    roughness: f32,
}

impl From<&CoolMaterial> for CoolMaterialUniform {
    fn from(material: &CoolMaterial) -> CoolMaterialUniform {
        CoolMaterialUniform {
            color: material.color,
            roughness: material.roughness,
        }
    }
}
```

### Material Specialization

Material shader specialization is now _much_ simpler:

```rust
#[derive(AsBindGroup, TypeUuid, Debug, Clone)]
#[uuid = "f690fdae-d598-45ab-8225-97e2a3f056e0"]
#[bind_group_data(CoolMaterialKey)]
struct CoolMaterial {
    #[uniform(0)]
    color: Color,
    is_red: bool,
}

#[derive(Copy, Clone, Hash, Eq, PartialEq)]
struct CoolMaterialKey {
    is_red: bool,
}

impl From<&CoolMaterial> for CoolMaterialKey {
    fn from(material: &CoolMaterial) -> CoolMaterialKey {
        CoolMaterialKey {
            is_red: material.is_red,
        }
    }
}

impl Material for CoolMaterial {
    fn fragment_shader() -> ShaderRef {
        "cool_material.wgsl".into()
    }

    fn specialize(
        pipeline: &MaterialPipeline<Self>,
        descriptor: &mut RenderPipelineDescriptor,
        layout: &MeshVertexBufferLayout,
        key: MaterialPipelineKey<Self>,
    ) -> Result<(), SpecializedMeshPipelineError> {
        if key.bind_group_data.is_red {
            let fragment = descriptor.fragment.as_mut().unwrap();
            fragment.shader_defs.push("IS_RED".to_string());
        }
        Ok(())
    }
}
```

Setting `bind_group_data` is not required for specialization (it defaults to `()`). Scenarios like "custom vertex attributes" also benefit from this system:
```rust
impl Material for CustomMaterial {
    fn vertex_shader() -> ShaderRef {
        "custom_material.wgsl".into()
    }

    fn fragment_shader() -> ShaderRef {
        "custom_material.wgsl".into()
    }

    fn specialize(
        pipeline: &MaterialPipeline<Self>,
        descriptor: &mut RenderPipelineDescriptor,
        layout: &MeshVertexBufferLayout,
        key: MaterialPipelineKey<Self>,
    ) -> Result<(), SpecializedMeshPipelineError> {
        let vertex_layout = layout.get_layout(&[
            Mesh::ATTRIBUTE_POSITION.at_shader_location(0),
            ATTRIBUTE_BLEND_COLOR.at_shader_location(1),
        ])?;
        descriptor.vertex.buffers = vec![vertex_layout];
        Ok(())
    }
}
```

### Ported `StandardMaterial` to the new `Material` system

Bevy's built-in PBR material uses the new Material system (including the AsBindGroup derive):

```rust
#[derive(AsBindGroup, Debug, Clone, TypeUuid)]
#[uuid = "7494888b-c082-457b-aacf-517228cc0c22"]
#[bind_group_data(StandardMaterialKey)]
#[uniform(0, StandardMaterialUniform)]
pub struct StandardMaterial {
    pub base_color: Color,
    #[texture(1)]
    #[sampler(2)]
    pub base_color_texture: Option<Handle<Image>>,
    /* other fields omitted for brevity */
```

### Ported Bevy examples to the new `Material` system

The overall complexity of Bevy's "custom shader examples" has gone down significantly. Take a look at the diffs if you want a dopamine spike.

Please note that while this PR has a net increase in "lines of code", most of those extra lines come from added documentation. There is a significant reduction
in the overall complexity of the code (even accounting for the new derive logic).

---

## Changelog

### Added

* `AsBindGroup` trait and derive, which make it much easier to transfer data to the gpu and generate bind groups for a given type.

### Changed

* The old `Material` and `SpecializedMaterial` traits have been replaced by a consolidated (much simpler) `Material` trait. Materials no longer implement `RenderAsset`.
* `StandardMaterial` was ported to the new material system. There are no user-facing api changes to the `StandardMaterial` struct api, but it now implements `AsBindGroup` and `Material` instead of `RenderAsset` and `SpecializedMaterial`.

## Migration Guide
The Material system has been reworked to be much simpler. We've removed a lot of boilerplate with the new `AsBindGroup` derive and the `Material` trait is simpler as well!

### Bevy 0.7 (old)

```rust
#[derive(Debug, Clone, TypeUuid)]
#[uuid = "f690fdae-d598-45ab-8225-97e2a3f056e0"]
pub struct CustomMaterial {
    color: Color,
    color_texture: Handle<Image>,
}

#[derive(Clone)]
pub struct GpuCustomMaterial {
    _buffer: Buffer,
    bind_group: BindGroup,
}

impl RenderAsset for CustomMaterial {
    type ExtractedAsset = CustomMaterial;
    type PreparedAsset = GpuCustomMaterial;
    type Param = (SRes<RenderDevice>, SRes<MaterialPipeline<Self>>);
    fn extract_asset(&self) -> Self::ExtractedAsset {
        self.clone()
    }

    fn prepare_asset(
        extracted_asset: Self::ExtractedAsset,
        (render_device, material_pipeline): &mut SystemParamItem<Self::Param>,
    ) -> Result<Self::PreparedAsset, PrepareAssetError<Self::ExtractedAsset>> {
        let color = Vec4::from_slice(&extracted_asset.color.as_linear_rgba_f32());

        let byte_buffer = [0u8; Vec4::SIZE.get() as usize];
        let mut buffer = encase::UniformBuffer::new(byte_buffer);
        buffer.write(&color).unwrap();

        let buffer = render_device.create_buffer_with_data(&BufferInitDescriptor {
            contents: buffer.as_ref(),
            label: None,
            usage: BufferUsages::UNIFORM | BufferUsages::COPY_DST,
        });

        let (texture_view, texture_sampler) = if let Some(result) = material_pipeline
            .mesh_pipeline
            .get_image_texture(gpu_images, &Some(extracted_asset.color_texture.clone()))
        {
            result
        } else {
            return Err(PrepareAssetError::RetryNextUpdate(extracted_asset));
        };
        let bind_group = render_device.create_bind_group(&BindGroupDescriptor {
            entries: &[
                BindGroupEntry {
                    binding: 0,
                    resource: buffer.as_entire_binding(),
                },
                BindGroupEntry {
                    binding: 0,
                    resource: BindingResource::TextureView(texture_view),
                },
                BindGroupEntry {
                    binding: 1,
                    resource: BindingResource::Sampler(texture_sampler),
                },
            ],
            label: None,
            layout: &material_pipeline.material_layout,
        });

        Ok(GpuCustomMaterial {
            _buffer: buffer,
            bind_group,
        })
    }
}

impl Material for CustomMaterial {
    fn fragment_shader(asset_server: &AssetServer) -> Option<Handle<Shader>> {
        Some(asset_server.load("custom_material.wgsl"))
    }

    fn bind_group(render_asset: &<Self as RenderAsset>::PreparedAsset) -> &BindGroup {
        &render_asset.bind_group
    }

    fn bind_group_layout(render_device: &RenderDevice) -> BindGroupLayout {
        render_device.create_bind_group_layout(&BindGroupLayoutDescriptor {
            entries: &[
                BindGroupLayoutEntry {
                    binding: 0,
                    visibility: ShaderStages::FRAGMENT,
                    ty: BindingType::Buffer {
                        ty: BufferBindingType::Uniform,
                        has_dynamic_offset: false,
                        min_binding_size: Some(Vec4::min_size()),
                    },
                    count: None,
                },
                BindGroupLayoutEntry {
                    binding: 1,
                    visibility: ShaderStages::FRAGMENT,
                    ty: BindingType::Texture {
                        multisampled: false,
                        sample_type: TextureSampleType::Float { filterable: true },
                        view_dimension: TextureViewDimension::D2Array,
                    },
                    count: None,
                },
                BindGroupLayoutEntry {
                    binding: 2,
                    visibility: ShaderStages::FRAGMENT,
                    ty: BindingType::Sampler(SamplerBindingType::Filtering),
                    count: None,
                },
            ],
            label: None,
        })
    }
}
```

### Bevy 0.8 (new)

```rust
impl Material for CustomMaterial {
    fn fragment_shader() -> ShaderRef {
        "custom_material.wgsl".into()
    }
}

#[derive(AsBindGroup, TypeUuid, Debug, Clone)]
#[uuid = "f690fdae-d598-45ab-8225-97e2a3f056e0"]
pub struct CustomMaterial {
    #[uniform(0)]
    color: Color,
    #[texture(1)]
    #[sampler(2)]
    color_texture: Handle<Image>,
}
```

## Future Work

* Add support for more binding types (cubemaps, buffers, etc). This PR intentionally includes a bare minimum number of binding types to keep "reviewability" in check.
* Consider optionally eliding binding indices using binding names. `AsBindGroup` could pass in (optional?) reflection info as a "hint".
    * This would make it possible for the derive to do this:
        ```rust
        #[derive(AsBindGroup)]
        pub struct CustomMaterial {
            #[uniform]
            color: Color,
            #[texture]
            #[sampler]
            color_texture: Option<Handle<Image>>,
            alpha_mode: AlphaMode,
        }
        ```
    * Or this
        ```rust
        #[derive(AsBindGroup)]
        pub struct CustomMaterial {
            #[binding]
            color: Color,
            #[binding]
            color_texture: Option<Handle<Image>>,
            alpha_mode: AlphaMode,
        }
        ```
    * Or even this (if we flip to "include bindings by default")
        ```rust
        #[derive(AsBindGroup)]
        pub struct CustomMaterial {
            color: Color,
            color_texture: Option<Handle<Image>>,
            #[binding(ignore)]
            alpha_mode: AlphaMode,
        }
        ```
* If we add the option to define custom draw functions for materials (which could be done in a type-erased way), I think that would be enough to support extra non-material bindings. Worth considering!
2022-06-30 23:48:46 +00:00
Robert Swain
cc4062ec43 Split mesh shader files (#4867)
# Objective

- Split PBR and 2D mesh shaders into types and bindings to prepare the shaders to be more reusable.
- See #3969 for details. I'm doing this in multiple steps to make review easier.

---

## Changelog

- Changed: 2D and PBR mesh shaders are now split into types and bindings, the following shader imports are available: `bevy_pbr::mesh_view_types`, `bevy_pbr::mesh_view_bindings`, `bevy_pbr::mesh_types`, `bevy_pbr::mesh_bindings`, `bevy_sprite::mesh2d_view_types`, `bevy_sprite::mesh2d_view_bindings`, `bevy_sprite::mesh2d_types`, `bevy_sprite::mesh2d_bindings`

## Migration Guide

- In shaders for 3D meshes:
  - `#import bevy_pbr::mesh_view_bind_group` -> `#import bevy_pbr::mesh_view_bindings`
  - `#import bevy_pbr::mesh_struct` -> `#import bevy_pbr::mesh_types`
    - NOTE: If you are using the mesh bind group at bind group index 2, you can remove those binding statements in your shader and just use `#import bevy_pbr::mesh_bindings` which itself imports the mesh types needed for the bindings.
- In shaders for 2D meshes:
  - `#import bevy_sprite::mesh2d_view_bind_group` -> `#import bevy_sprite::mesh2d_view_bindings`
  - `#import bevy_sprite::mesh2d_struct` -> `#import bevy_sprite::mesh2d_types`
    - NOTE: If you are using the mesh2d bind group at bind group index 2, you can remove those binding statements in your shader and just use `#import bevy_sprite::mesh2d_bindings` which itself imports the mesh2d types needed for the bindings.
2022-05-31 23:23:25 +00:00
robtfm
ee4bcbea3c add depth_bias to SpecializedMaterial (#4101)
# Objective

allow meshes with equal z-depth to be rendered in a chosen order / avoid z-fighting

## Solution

add a depth_bias to SpecializedMaterial that is added to the mesh depth used for render-ordering.
2022-05-31 02:02:49 +00:00
Félix Lescaudey de Maneville
f000c2b951 Clippy improvements (#4665)
# Objective

Follow up to my previous MR #3718 to add new clippy warnings to bevy:

- [x] [~~option_if_let_else~~](https://rust-lang.github.io/rust-clippy/master/#option_if_let_else) (reverted)
- [x] [redundant_else](https://rust-lang.github.io/rust-clippy/master/#redundant_else)
- [x] [match_same_arms](https://rust-lang.github.io/rust-clippy/master/#match_same_arms)
- [x] [semicolon_if_nothing_returned](https://rust-lang.github.io/rust-clippy/master/#semicolon_if_nothing_returned)
- [x] [explicit_iter_loop](https://rust-lang.github.io/rust-clippy/master/#explicit_iter_loop)
- [x] [map_flatten](https://rust-lang.github.io/rust-clippy/master/#map_flatten)

There is one commit per clippy warning, and the matching flags are added to the CI execution.

To test the CI execution you may run `cargo run -p ci -- clippy` at the root.

I choose the add the flags in the `ci` tool crate to avoid having them in every `lib.rs` but I guess it could become an issue with suprise warnings coming up after a commit/push


Co-authored-by: Carter Anderson <mcanders1@gmail.com>
2022-05-31 01:38:07 +00:00
Teodor Tanasoaia
7cb4d3cb43 Migrate to encase from crevice (#4339)
# Objective

- Unify buffer APIs
- Also see #4272

## Solution

- Replace vendored `crevice` with `encase`

---

## Changelog

Changed `StorageBuffer`
Added `DynamicStorageBuffer`
Replaced `UniformVec` with `UniformBuffer`
Replaced `DynamicUniformVec` with `DynamicUniformBuffer`

## Migration Guide

### `StorageBuffer`

removed `set_body()`, `values()`, `values_mut()`, `clear()`, `push()`, `append()`
added `set()`, `get()`, `get_mut()`

### `UniformVec` -> `UniformBuffer`

renamed `uniform_buffer()` to `buffer()`
removed `len()`, `is_empty()`, `capacity()`, `push()`, `reserve()`, `clear()`, `values()`
added `set()`, `get()`

### `DynamicUniformVec` -> `DynamicUniformBuffer`

renamed `uniform_buffer()` to `buffer()`
removed `capacity()`, `reserve()`


Co-authored-by: Carter Anderson <mcanders1@gmail.com>
2022-05-18 21:09:21 +00:00
Charles
3f4ac65682 set alpha_mode based on alpha value (#4658)
# Objective

- When spawning a sprite the alpha is used for transparency, but when using the `Color::into()` implementation to spawn a `StandardMaterial`, the alpha is ignored.
- Pretty much everytime I want to make something transparent I started with a `Color::rgb().into()` and I'm always surprised that it doesn't work when changing it to  `Color::rgba().into()`
- It's possible there's an issue with this approach I am not thinking of, but I'm not sure what's the point of setting an alpha value without the goal of making a color transparent.

## Solution

- Set the alpha_mode to AlphaMode::Blend when the alpha is not the default value.

---

## Migration Guide

This is not a breaking change, but it can easily be migrated to reduce boilerplate

```rust
commands.spawn_bundle(PbrBundle {
    mesh: meshes.add(shape::Cube::default().into()),
    material: materials.add(StandardMaterial {
        base_color: Color::rgba(1.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.75),
        alpha_mode: AlphaMode::Blend,
        ..default()
    }),
    ..default()
});

// becomes

commands.spawn_bundle(PbrBundle {
    mesh: meshes.add(shape::Cube::default().into()),
    material: materials.add(Color::rgba(1.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.75).into()),
    ..default()
});
```


Co-authored-by: Charles <IceSentry@users.noreply.github.com>
2022-05-04 22:10:20 +00:00
Robert Swain
c5963b4fd5 Use storage buffers for clustered forward point lights (#3989)
# Objective

- Make use of storage buffers, where they are available, for clustered forward bindings to support far more point lights in a scene
- Fixes #3605 
- Based on top of #4079 

This branch on an M1 Max can keep 60fps with about 2150 point lights of radius 1m in the Sponza scene where I've been testing. The bottleneck is mostly assigning lights to clusters which grows faster than linearly (I think 1000 lights was about 1.5ms and 5000 was 7.5ms). I have seen papers and presentations leveraging compute shaders that can get this up to over 1 million. That said, I think any further optimisations should probably be done in a separate PR.

## Solution

- Add `RenderDevice` to the `Material` and `SpecializedMaterial` trait `::key()` functions to allow setting flags on the keys depending on feature/limit availability
- Make `GpuPointLights` and `ViewClusterBuffers` into enums containing `UniformVec` and `StorageBuffer` variants. Implement the necessary API on them to make usage the same for both cases, and the only difference is at initialisation time.
- Appropriate shader defs in the shader code to handle the two cases

## Context on some decisions / open questions

- I'm using `max_storage_buffers_per_shader_stage >= 3` as a check to see if storage buffers are supported. I was thinking about diving into 'binding resource management' but it feels like we don't have enough use cases to understand the problem yet, and it is mostly a separate concern to this PR, so I think it should be handled separately.
- Should `ViewClusterBuffers` and `ViewClusterBindings` be merged, duplicating the count variables into the enum variants?


Co-authored-by: Carter Anderson <mcanders1@gmail.com>
2022-04-07 16:16:35 +00:00
Robert Swain
579928e8e0 bevy_pbr: Support flipping tangent space normal map y for DirectX normal maps (#4433)
# Objective

- Normal maps authored for DirectX use a left-handed convention and have their tangent space normal in the texture inverted from what we need. Support this.
- Details here: https://doc.babylonjs.com/divingDeeper/materials/advanced/normalMaps

## Solution

- Add a `StandardMaterial` `flip_normal_map_y` boolean field
- Add a `STANDARDMATERIAL_FLIP_NORMAL_MAP_Y` flag to `StandardMaterialFlags` and in the PBR shader
- Flip the y-component of the tangent space normal just after sampling it from the normal map texture

## Screenshots

### Before

<img width="1392" alt="Screenshot 2022-04-06 at 21 04 44" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/302146/162050314-e7bfaaf6-9ee1-4756-9821-f6f5ff78f508.png">

### After

<img width="1392" alt="Screenshot 2022-04-06 at 21 03 39" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/302146/162050255-36ee0745-1d79-4fd2-9a1c-18085376b643.png">

---

## Changelog

- Added: Support for flipping the normal map texture y component for normal maps authored for use with DirectX
2022-04-07 15:50:14 +00:00
Robert Swain
0529f633f9 KTX2/DDS/.basis compressed texture support (#3884)
# Objective

- Support compressed textures including 'universal' formats (ETC1S, UASTC) and transcoding of them to 
- Support `.dds`, `.ktx2`, and `.basis` files

## Solution

- Fixes https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/issues/3608 Look there for more details.
- Note that the functionality is all enabled through non-default features. If it is desirable to enable some by default, I can do that.
- The `basis-universal` crate, used for `.basis` file support and for transcoding, is built on bindings against a C++ library. It's not feasible to rewrite in Rust in a short amount of time. There are no Rust alternatives of which I am aware and it's specialised code. In its current state it doesn't support the wasm target, but I don't know for sure. However, it is possible to build the upstream C++ library with emscripten, so there is perhaps a way to add support for web too with some shenanigans.
- There's no support for transcoding from BasisLZ/ETC1S in KTX2 files as it was quite non-trivial to implement and didn't feel important given people could use `.basis` files for ETC1S.
2022-03-15 22:26:46 +00:00
Robert Bragg
1d5145fd64 StandardMaterial: expose a cull_mode option (#3982)
This makes it possible for materials to configure front or
back face culling, or disable culling.

Initially I looked at specializing the Mesh which currently
controls this state but conceptually it seems more appropriate
to control this at the material level, not the mesh level.

_Just for reference this also seems to be consistent with Unity
where materials/shaders can configure the culling mode between
front/back/off - as opposed to configuring any culling state
when importing a mesh._

After some archaeology, trying to understand how this might
relate to the existing 'double_sided' option, it was determined
that double_sided is a more high level lighting option originally
from Filament that will cause the normals for back faces to be
flipped.

For sake of avoiding complexity, but keeping control this
currently keeps the options orthogonal, and adds some clarifying
documentation for `double_sided`. This won't affect any existing
apps since there hasn't been a way to disable backface culling
up until now, so the option was essentially redundant.

double_sided support could potentially be updated to imply
disabling of backface culling.

For reference https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/pull/3734/commits also looks at exposing cull mode control. I think the main difference here is that this patch handles RenderPipelineDescriptor specialization directly within the StandardMaterial implementation instead of communicating info back to the Mesh via the `queue_material_meshes` system.

With the way material.rs builds up the final RenderPipelineDescriptor first by calling specialize for the MeshPipeline followed by specialize for the material then it seems like we have a natural place to override anything in the descriptor that's first configured for the mesh state.
2022-03-05 03:37:23 +00:00
Carter Anderson
e369a8ad51 Mesh vertex buffer layouts (#3959)
This PR makes a number of changes to how meshes and vertex attributes are handled, which the goal of enabling easy and flexible custom vertex attributes:
* Reworks the `Mesh` type to use the newly added `VertexAttribute` internally
  * `VertexAttribute` defines the name, a unique `VertexAttributeId`, and a `VertexFormat`
  *  `VertexAttributeId` is used to produce consistent sort orders for vertex buffer generation, replacing the more expensive and often surprising "name based sorting"  
  * Meshes can be used to generate a `MeshVertexBufferLayout`, which defines the layout of the gpu buffer produced by the mesh. `MeshVertexBufferLayouts` can then be used to generate actual `VertexBufferLayouts` according to the requirements of a specific pipeline. This decoupling of "mesh layout" vs "pipeline vertex buffer layout" is what enables custom attributes. We don't need to standardize _mesh layouts_ or contort meshes to meet the needs of a specific pipeline. As long as the mesh has what the pipeline needs, it will work transparently. 
* Mesh-based pipelines now specialize on `&MeshVertexBufferLayout` via the new `SpecializedMeshPipeline` trait (which behaves like `SpecializedPipeline`, but adds `&MeshVertexBufferLayout`). The integrity of the pipeline cache is maintained because the `MeshVertexBufferLayout` is treated as part of the key (which is fully abstracted from implementers of the trait ... no need to add any additional info to the specialization key).    
* Hashing `MeshVertexBufferLayout` is too expensive to do for every entity, every frame. To make this scalable, I added a generalized "pre-hashing" solution to `bevy_utils`: `Hashed<T>` keys and `PreHashMap<K, V>` (which uses `Hashed<T>` internally) . Why didn't I just do the quick and dirty in-place "pre-compute hash and use that u64 as a key in a hashmap" that we've done in the past? Because its wrong! Hashes by themselves aren't enough because two different values can produce the same hash. Re-hashing a hash is even worse! I decided to build a generalized solution because this pattern has come up in the past and we've chosen to do the wrong thing. Now we can do the right thing! This did unfortunately require pulling in `hashbrown` and using that in `bevy_utils`, because avoiding re-hashes requires the `raw_entry_mut` api, which isn't stabilized yet (and may never be ... `entry_ref` has favor now, but also isn't available yet). If std's HashMap ever provides the tools we need, we can move back to that. Note that adding `hashbrown` doesn't increase our dependency count because it was already in our tree. I will probably break these changes out into their own PR.
* Specializing on `MeshVertexBufferLayout` has one non-obvious behavior: it can produce identical pipelines for two different MeshVertexBufferLayouts. To optimize the number of active pipelines / reduce re-binds while drawing, I de-duplicate pipelines post-specialization using the final `VertexBufferLayout` as the key.  For example, consider a pipeline that needs the layout `(position, normal)` and is specialized using two meshes: `(position, normal, uv)` and `(position, normal, other_vec2)`. If both of these meshes result in `(position, normal)` specializations, we can use the same pipeline! Now we do. Cool!

To briefly illustrate, this is what the relevant section of `MeshPipeline`'s specialization code looks like now:

```rust
impl SpecializedMeshPipeline for MeshPipeline {
    type Key = MeshPipelineKey;

    fn specialize(
        &self,
        key: Self::Key,
        layout: &MeshVertexBufferLayout,
    ) -> RenderPipelineDescriptor {
        let mut vertex_attributes = vec![
            Mesh::ATTRIBUTE_POSITION.at_shader_location(0),
            Mesh::ATTRIBUTE_NORMAL.at_shader_location(1),
            Mesh::ATTRIBUTE_UV_0.at_shader_location(2),
        ];

        let mut shader_defs = Vec::new();
        if layout.contains(Mesh::ATTRIBUTE_TANGENT) {
            shader_defs.push(String::from("VERTEX_TANGENTS"));
            vertex_attributes.push(Mesh::ATTRIBUTE_TANGENT.at_shader_location(3));
        }

        let vertex_buffer_layout = layout
            .get_layout(&vertex_attributes)
            .expect("Mesh is missing a vertex attribute");
```

Notice that this is _much_ simpler than it was before. And now any mesh with any layout can be used with this pipeline, provided it has vertex postions, normals, and uvs. We even got to remove `HAS_TANGENTS` from MeshPipelineKey and `has_tangents` from `GpuMesh`, because that information is redundant with `MeshVertexBufferLayout`.

This is still a draft because I still need to:

* Add more docs
* Experiment with adding error handling to mesh pipeline specialization (which would print errors at runtime when a mesh is missing a vertex attribute required by a pipeline). If it doesn't tank perf, we'll keep it.
* Consider breaking out the PreHash / hashbrown changes into a separate PR.
* Add an example illustrating this change
* Verify that the "mesh-specialized pipeline de-duplication code" works properly

Please dont yell at me for not doing these things yet :) Just trying to get this in peoples' hands asap.

Alternative to #3120
Fixes #3030


Co-authored-by: Carter Anderson <mcanders1@gmail.com>
2022-02-23 23:21:13 +00:00
danieleades
d8974e7c3d small and mostly pointless refactoring (#2934)
What is says on the tin.

This has got more to do with making `clippy` slightly more *quiet* than it does with changing anything that might greatly impact readability or performance.

that said, deriving `Default` for a couple of structs is a nice easy win
2022-02-13 22:33:55 +00:00
Carter Anderson
963e2f08a2 Materials and MaterialPlugin (#3428)
This adds "high level" `Material` and `SpecializedMaterial` traits, which can be used with a `MaterialPlugin<T: SpecializedMaterial>`. `MaterialPlugin` automatically registers the appropriate resources, draw functions, and queue systems. The `Material` trait is simpler, and should cover most use cases. `SpecializedMaterial` is like `Material`, but it also requires defining a "specialization key" (see #3031). `Material` has a trivial blanket impl of `SpecializedMaterial`, which allows us to use the same types + functions for both.

This makes defining custom 3d materials much simpler (see the `shader_material` example diff) and ensures consistent behavior across all 3d materials (both built in and custom). I ported the built in `StandardMaterial` to `MaterialPlugin`. There is also a new `MaterialMeshBundle<T: SpecializedMaterial>`, which `PbrBundle` aliases to.
2021-12-25 21:45:43 +00:00