# Objective
When trying to test a gizmos change I ran `cargo test -p bevy_gizmos`
and the output had a lot of noise from warnings and failed doc errors.
This was because I didn't have all of the features enabled.
## Solution
I admit this might be pedantic, and am happy if the concensus is to
reject it. Although it does reduce the lines of code, testing noise, and
the amount of code compiled. I don't think it affects the complexity of
public code, and it doesn't change much to the complexity of internal
code.
I've removed un-needed `bevy_render` imports in all of the gizmos docs
examples, there's probably other unnecessary ones there too, but I
haven't looked exhaustively. It isn't needed for those docs, and isn't
available except in a subset of `cfg` combinations.
I've also made several of the `use` statements slightly more specific. I
shouldn't have changed the public interfaces, except that
`GizmoMeshConfig` requires either `bevy_sprite` or `bevy_pbr`, as it
does nothing without them.
I've also avoided adding some systems and plugins in situations where
they can't work. An example of this is where the `light` module depends
on `all(feature = "bevy_pbr", feature = "bevy_render")`, but it has
`use` statements that only require `bevy_render`.
## Testing
During development I ran:
```
cargo check -p bevy_gizmos && cargo check -p bevy_gizmos --features=bevy_pbr && cargo check -p bevy_gizmos --features=bevy_sprite && cargo check -p bevy_gizmos --features=bevy_render
```
Afterwards I ran this just to be sure:
```
cargo check && cargo check --features=bevy_pbr && cargo check --features=bevy_sprite && cargo check --features=bevy_render
```
Finally I ran:
```
cargo test -p bevy_gizmos && cargo test -p bevy_gizmos --features=bevy_pbr && test check -p bevy_gizmos --features=bevy_sprite && cargo test -p bevy_gizmos --features=bevy_render
```
## Migration Guide
There shouldn't be any reason to migrate, although if for some reason
you use `GizmoMeshConfig` and `bevy_render` but not `bevy_pbr` or
`bevy_sprite` (such that it does nothing), then you will get an error
that it no longer exists.
# Objective
- Make gizmos behavior consistent across platforms
## Solution
- Use `u32` instead of `usize` for resolution/subdivisions/segments/etc
fields
---
## Changelog
- Change resolutions in gizmos from `usize` to `u32`
## Migration Guide
- All gizmos now take `u32` instead of `usize` for their
resolution/subdivision/segment counts
# Objective
- Fixes#13412
## Solution
- Renamed `segments` in `bevy_gizmos` to `resolution` and adjusted
examples
## Migration Guide
- When working with gizmos, replace all calls to `.segments(...)` with
`.resolution(...)`
# Objective
- Implement rounded cuboids and rectangles, suggestion of #9400
## Solution
- Added `Gizmos::rounded_cuboid`, `Gizmos::rounded_rect` and
`Gizmos::rounded_rect_2d`.
- All of these return builders that allow configuring of the corner/edge
radius using `.corner_radius(...)` or `.edge_radius(...)` as well as the
line segments of each arc using `.arc_segments(...)`.
---
## Changelog
- Added a new `rounded_box` module to `bevy_gizmos` containing all of
the above methods and builders.
- Updated the examples `2d_gizmos` and `3d_gizmos`
## Additional information
The 3d example now looks like this:
<img width="1440" alt="Screenshot 2024-02-28 at 01 47 28"
src="https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/assets/62256001/654e30ca-c091-4f14-a402-90138e95c71b">
And this is the updated 2d example showcasing negative corner radius:
<img width="1440" alt="Screenshot 2024-02-28 at 01 59 37"
src="https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/assets/62256001/3904697a-5462-4ee7-abd9-3e893ca07082">
<img width="1440" alt="Screenshot 2024-02-28 at 01 59 47"
src="https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/assets/62256001/a8892cfd-3aad-4c0c-87eb-559c17c8864c">
---------
Co-authored-by: JMS55 <47158642+JMS55@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: James Gayfer <10660608+jgayfer@users.noreply.github.com>
