When building Bevy using Bazel, you don't need a 'Cargo.toml'... except
Bevy requires it currently. Hopefully this can help illuminate the
requirement.
# Objective
I recently started exploring Bazel and Buck2. Currently Bazel has some
great advantages over Cargo for me and I was pretty happy to find that
things generally work quite well!
Once I added a target to my test project that depended on bevy but
didn't use Cargo, I didn't create a Cargo.toml file for it and things
appeared to work, but as soon as I went to derive from Component the
build failed with the cryptic error:
```
ERROR: /Users/photex/workspaces/personal/mb-rogue/scratch/BUILD:24:12: Compiling Rust bin hello_bevy (0 files) failed: (Exit 1): process_wrapper failed: error executing command (from target //scratch:hello_bevy) bazel-out/darwin_arm64-opt-exec-2B5CBBC6/bin/external/rules_rust/util/process_wrapper/process_wrapper --arg-file ... (remaining 312 arguments skipped)
error: proc-macro derive panicked
--> scratch/hello_bevy.rs:5:10
|
5 | #[derive(Component)]
| ^^^^^^^^^
|
= help: message: called `Result::unwrap()` on an `Err` value: Os { code: 2, kind: NotFound, message: "No such file or directory" }
error: proc-macro derive panicked
--> scratch/hello_bevy.rs:8:10
|
8 | #[derive(Component)]
| ^^^^^^^^^
|
= help: message: called `Result::unwrap()` on an `Err` value: Os { code: 2, kind: NotFound, message: "No such file or directory" }
```
## Solution
After poking around I realized that the proc macros in Bevy all use
bevy_macro_utils::BevyManifest, which was attempting to load a Cargo
manifest that doesn't exist.
This PR doesn't address the Cargo requirement (I'd love to see if there
was a way to support more than Cargo transparently), but it *does*
replace some calls to unwrap with expect and hopefully the error
messages will be more helpful for other folks like me hoping to pat down
a new trail:
```
ERROR: /Users/photex/workspaces/personal/mb-rogue/scratch/BUILD:23:12: Compiling Rust bin hello_bevy (0 files) failed: (Exit 1): process_wrapper failed: error executing command (from target //scratch:hello_bevy) bazel-out/darwin_arm64-opt-exec-2B5CBBC6/bin/external/rules_rust/util/process_wrapper/process_wrapper --arg-file ... (remaining 312 arguments skipped)
error: proc-macro derive panicked
--> scratch/hello_bevy.rs:5:10
|
5 | #[derive(Component)]
| ^^^^^^^^^
|
= help: message: Unable to read cargo manifest: /private/var/tmp/_bazel_photex/135f23dc56826c24d6c3c9f6b688b2fe/execroot/__main__/scratch/Cargo.toml: Os { code: 2, kind: NotFound, message: "No such file or directory" }
error: proc-macro derive panicked
--> scratch/hello_bevy.rs:8:10
|
8 | #[derive(Component)]
| ^^^^^^^^^
|
= help: message: Unable to read cargo manifest: /private/var/tmp/_bazel_photex/135f23dc56826c24d6c3c9f6b688b2fe/execroot/__main__/scratch/Cargo.toml: Os { code: 2, kind: NotFound, message: "No such file or directory" }
```
Co-authored-by: Chip Collier <chip.collier@avid.com>
# Objective
Methods for interacting with world schedules currently have two
variants: one that takes `impl ScheduleLabel` and one that takes `&dyn
ScheduleLabel`. Operations such as `run_schedule` or `schedule_scope`
only use the label by reference, so there is little reason to have an
owned variant of these functions.
## Solution
Decrease maintenance burden by merging the `ref` variants of these
functions with the owned variants.
---
## Changelog
- Deprecated `World::run_schedule_ref`. It is now redundant, since
`World::run_schedule` can take values by reference.
## Migration Guide
The method `World::run_schedule_ref` has been deprecated, and will be
removed in the next version of Bevy. Use `run_schedule` instead.
# Objective
Label traits such as `ScheduleLabel` currently have a major footgun: the
trait is implemented for `Box<dyn ScheduleLabel>`, but the
implementation does not function as one would expect since `Box<T>` is
considered to be a distinct type from `T`. This is because the behavior
of the `ScheduleLabel` trait is specified mainly through blanket
implementations, which prevents `Box<dyn ScheduleLabel>` from being
properly special-cased.
## Solution
Replace the blanket-implemented behavior with a series of methods
defined on `ScheduleLabel`. This allows us to fully special-case
`Box<dyn ScheduleLabel>` .
---
## Changelog
Fixed a bug where boxed label types (such as `Box<dyn ScheduleLabel>`)
behaved incorrectly when compared with concretely-typed labels.
## Migration Guide
The `ScheduleLabel` trait has been refactored to no longer depend on the
traits `std::any::Any`, `bevy_utils::DynEq`, and `bevy_utils::DynHash`.
Any manual implementations will need to implement new trait methods in
their stead.
```rust
impl ScheduleLabel for MyType {
// Before:
fn dyn_clone(&self) -> Box<dyn ScheduleLabel> { ... }
// After:
fn dyn_clone(&self) -> Box<dyn ScheduleLabel> { ... }
fn as_dyn_eq(&self) -> &dyn DynEq {
self
}
// No, `mut state: &mut` is not a typo.
fn dyn_hash(&self, mut state: &mut dyn Hasher) {
self.hash(&mut state);
// Hashing the TypeId isn't strictly necessary, but it prevents collisions.
TypeId::of::<Self>().hash(&mut state);
}
}
```
# Objective
The clippy lint `type_complexity` is known not to play well with bevy.
It frequently triggers when writing complex queries, and taking the
lint's advice of using a type alias almost always just obfuscates the
code with no benefit. Because of this, this lint is currently ignored in
CI, but unfortunately it still shows up when viewing bevy code in an
IDE.
As someone who's made a fair amount of pull requests to this repo, I
will say that this issue has been a consistent thorn in my side. Since
bevy code is filled with spurious, ignorable warnings, it can be very
difficult to spot the *real* warnings that must be fixed -- most of the
time I just ignore all warnings, only to later find out that one of them
was real after I'm done when CI runs.
## Solution
Suppress this lint in all bevy crates. This was previously attempted in
#7050, but the review process ended up making it more complicated than
it needs to be and landed on a subpar solution.
The discussion in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/pull/10571
explores some better long-term solutions to this problem. Since there is
no timeline on when these solutions may land, we should resolve this
issue in the meantime by locally suppressing these lints.
### Unresolved issues
Currently, these lints are not suppressed in our examples, since that
would require suppressing the lint in every single source file. They are
still ignored in CI.
# Objective
Fix#1727Fix#8010
Meta types generated by the `SystemParam` and `WorldQuery` derive macros
can conflict with user-defined types if they happen to have the same
name.
## Solution
In order to check if an identifier would conflict with user-defined
types, we can just search the original `TokenStream` passed to the macro
to see if it contains the identifier (since the meta types are defined
in an anonymous scope, it's only possible for them to conflict with the
struct definition itself). When generating an identifier for meta types,
we can simply check if it would conflict, and then add additional
characters to the name until it no longer conflicts with anything.
The `WorldQuery` "Item" and read-only structs are a part of a module's
public API, and thus it is intended for them to conflict with
user-defined types.
# Objective
NOTE: This depends on #7267 and should not be merged until #7267 is merged. If you are reviewing this before that is merged, I highly recommend viewing the Base Sets commit instead of trying to find my changes amongst those from #7267.
"Default sets" as described by the [Stageless RFC](https://github.com/bevyengine/rfcs/pull/45) have some [unfortunate consequences](https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/discussions/7365).
## Solution
This adds "base sets" as a variant of `SystemSet`:
A set is a "base set" if `SystemSet::is_base` returns `true`. Typically this will be opted-in to using the `SystemSet` derive:
```rust
#[derive(SystemSet, Clone, Hash, Debug, PartialEq, Eq)]
#[system_set(base)]
enum MyBaseSet {
A,
B,
}
```
**Base sets are exclusive**: a system can belong to at most one "base set". Adding a system to more than one will result in an error. When possible we fail immediately during system-config-time with a nice file + line number. For the more nested graph-ey cases, this will fail at the final schedule build.
**Base sets cannot belong to other sets**: this is where the word "base" comes from
Systems and Sets can only be added to base sets using `in_base_set`. Calling `in_set` with a base set will fail. As will calling `in_base_set` with a normal set.
```rust
app.add_system(foo.in_base_set(MyBaseSet::A))
// X must be a normal set ... base sets cannot be added to base sets
.configure_set(X.in_base_set(MyBaseSet::A))
```
Base sets can still be configured like normal sets:
```rust
app.add_system(MyBaseSet::B.after(MyBaseSet::Ap))
```
The primary use case for base sets is enabling a "default base set":
```rust
schedule.set_default_base_set(CoreSet::Update)
// this will belong to CoreSet::Update by default
.add_system(foo)
// this will override the default base set with PostUpdate
.add_system(bar.in_base_set(CoreSet::PostUpdate))
```
This allows us to build apis that work by default in the standard Bevy style. This is a rough analog to the "default stage" model, but it use the new "stageless sets" model instead, with all of the ordering flexibility (including exclusive systems) that it provides.
---
## Changelog
- Added "base sets" and ported CoreSet to use them.
## Migration Guide
TODO
# Objective
Fixes#5675. Replace `toml` with `toml_edit`
## Solution
Replace `toml` with `toml_edit`. This conveniently also removes the `serde` dependency from `bevy_macro_utils`, which may speed up cold compilation by removing the serde bottleneck from most of the macro crates in the engine.
# Objective
Complete the first part of the migration detailed in bevyengine/rfcs#45.
## Solution
Add all the new stuff.
### TODO
- [x] Impl tuple methods.
- [x] Impl chaining.
- [x] Port ambiguity detection.
- [x] Write docs.
- [x] ~~Write more tests.~~(will do later)
- [ ] Write changelog and examples here?
- [x] ~~Replace `petgraph`.~~ (will do later)
Co-authored-by: james7132 <contact@jamessliu.com>
Co-authored-by: Michael Hsu <mike.hsu@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Mike Hsu <mike.hsu@gmail.com>
# Objective
- It can be useful for third party crates to work independently on how bevy is imported
## Solution
- Expose an helper to get a subcrate path for macros
# Objective
- fix new clippy lints before they get stable and break CI
## Solution
- run `clippy --fix` to auto-fix machine-applicable lints
- silence `clippy::should_implement_trait` for `fn HandleId::default<T: Asset>`
## Changes
- always prefer `format!("{inline}")` over `format!("{}", not_inline)`
- prefer `Box::default` (or `Box::<T>::default` if necessary) over `Box::new(T::default())`
# Objective
- Provide better compile-time errors and diagnostics.
- Add more options to allow more textures types and sampler types.
- Update array_texture example to use upgraded AsBindGroup derive macro.
## Solution
Split out the parsing of the inner struct/field attributes (the inside part of a `#[foo(...)]` attribute) for better clarity
Parse the binding index for all inner attributes, as it is part of all attributes (`#[foo(0, ...)`), then allow each attribute implementer to parse the rest of the attribute metadata as needed. This should make it very trivial to extend/change if needed in the future.
Replaced invocations of `panic!` with the `syn::Error` type, providing fine-grained errors that retains span information. This provides much nicer compile-time errors, and even better IDE errors.
Updated the array_texture example to demonstrate the new changes.
## New AsBindGroup attribute options
### `#[texture(u32, ...)]`
Where `...` is an optional list of arguments.
| Arguments | Values | Default |
|-------------- |---------------------------------------------------------------- | ----------- |
| dimension = "..." | `"1d"`, `"2d"`, `"2d_array"`, `"3d"`, `"cube"`, `"cube_array"` | `"2d"` |
| sample_type = "..." | `"float"`, `"depth"`, `"s_int"` or `"u_int"` | `"float"` |
| filterable = ... | `true`, `false` | `true` |
| multisampled = ... | `true`, `false` | `false` |
| visibility(...) | `all`, `none`, or a list-combination of `vertex`, `fragment`, `compute` | `vertex`, `fragment` |
Example: `#[texture(0, dimension = "2d_array", visibility(vertex, fragment))]`
### `#[sampler(u32, ...)]`
Where `...` is an optional list of arguments.
| Arguments | Values | Default |
|----------- |--------------------------------------------------- | ----------- |
| sampler_type = "..." | `"filtering"`, `"non_filtering"`, `"comparison"`. | `"filtering"` |
| visibility(...) | `all`, `none`, or a list-combination of `vertex`, `fragment`, `compute` | `vertex`, `fragment` |
Example: `#[sampler(0, sampler_type = "filtering", visibility(vertex, fragment)]`
## Changelog
- Added more options to `#[texture(...)]` and `#[sampler(...)]` attributes, supporting more kinds of materials. See above for details.
- Upgraded IDE and compile-time error messages.
- Updated array_texture example using the new options.
# Objective
Fixes#5362
## Solution
Add the attribute `#[label(ignore_fields)]` for `*Label` types.
```rust
#[derive(SystemLabel)]
pub enum MyLabel {
One,
// Previously this was not allowed since labels cannot contain data.
#[system_label(ignore_fields)]
Two(PhantomData<usize>),
}
```
## Notes
This label makes it possible for equality to behave differently depending on whether or not you are treating the type as a label. For example:
```rust
#[derive(SystemLabel, PartialEq, Eq)]
#[system_label(ignore_fields)]
pub struct Foo(usize);
```
If you compare it as a label, it will ignore the wrapped fields as the user requested. But if you compare it as a `Foo`, the derive will incorrectly compare the inner fields. I see a few solutions
1. Do nothing. This is technically intended behavior, but I think we should do our best to prevent footguns.
2. Generate impls of `PartialEq` and `Eq` along with the `#[derive(Label)]` macros. This is a breaking change as it requires all users to remove these derives from their types.
3. Only allow `PhantomData` to be used with `ignore_fields` -- seems needlessly prescriptive.
---
## Changelog
* Added the `ignore_fields` attribute to the derive macros for `*Label` types.
* Added an example showing off different forms of the derive macro.
<!--
## Migration Guide
> This section is optional. If there are no breaking changes, you can delete this section.
- If this PR is a breaking change (relative to the last release of Bevy), describe how a user might need to migrate their code to support these changes
- Simply adding new functionality is not a breaking change.
- Fixing behavior that was definitely a bug, rather than a questionable design choice is not a breaking change.
-->
# Objective
- Closes#4954
- Reduce the complexity of the `{System, App, *}Label` APIs.
## Solution
For the sake of brevity I will only refer to `SystemLabel`, but everything applies to all of the other label types as well.
- Add `SystemLabelId`, a lightweight, `copy` struct.
- Convert custom types into `SystemLabelId` using the trait `SystemLabel`.
## Changelog
- String literals implement `SystemLabel` for now, but this should be changed with #4409 .
## Migration Guide
- Any previous use of `Box<dyn SystemLabel>` should be replaced with `SystemLabelId`.
- `AsSystemLabel` trait has been modified.
- No more output generics.
- Method `as_system_label` now returns `SystemLabelId`, removing an unnecessary level of indirection.
- If you *need* a label that is determined at runtime, you can use `Box::leak`. Not recommended.
## Questions for later
* Should we generate a `Debug` impl along with `#[derive(*Label)]`?
* Should we rename `as_str()`?
* Should we remove the extra derives (such as `Hash`) from builtin `*Label` types?
* Should we automatically derive types like `Clone, Copy, PartialEq, Eq`?
* More-ergonomic comparisons between `Label` and `LabelId`.
* Move `Dyn{Eq, Hash,Clone}` somewhere else.
* Some API to make interning dynamic labels easier.
* Optimize string representation
* Empty string for unit structs -- no debug info but faster comparisons
* Don't show enum types -- same tradeoffs as asbove.
# Objective
The `bevy_reflect_derive` crate is not the cleanest or easiest to follow/maintain. The `lib.rs` file is especially difficult with over 1000 lines of code written in a confusing order. This is just a result of growth within the crate and it would be nice to clean it up for future work.
## Solution
Split `bevy_reflect_derive` into many more submodules. The submodules include:
* `container_attributes` - Code relating to container attributes
* `derive_data` - Code relating to reflection-based derive metadata
* `field_attributes` - Code relating to field attributes
* `impls` - Code containing actual reflection implementations
* `reflect_value` - Code relating to reflection-based value metadata
* `registration` - Code relating to type registration
* `utility` - General-purpose utility functions
This leaves the `lib.rs` file to contain only the public macros, making it much easier to digest (and fewer than 200 lines).
By breaking up the code into smaller modules, we make it easier for future contributors to find the code they're looking for or identify which module best fits their own additions.
### Metadata Structs
This cleanup also adds two big metadata structs: `ReflectFieldAttr` and `ReflectDeriveData`. The former is used to store all attributes for a struct field (if any). The latter is used to store all metadata for struct-based derive inputs.
Both significantly reduce code duplication and make editing these macros much simpler. The tradeoff is that we may collect more metadata than needed. However, this is usually a small thing (such as checking for attributes when they're not really needed or creating a `ReflectFieldAttr` for every field regardless of whether they actually have an attribute).
We could try to remove these tradeoffs and squeeze some more performance out, but doing so might come at the cost of developer experience. Personally, I think it's much nicer to create a `ReflectFieldAttr` for every field since it means I don't have to do two `Option` checks. Others may disagree, though, and so we can discuss changing this either in this PR or in a future one.
### Out of Scope
_Some_ documentation has been added or improved, but ultimately good docs are probably best saved for a dedicated PR.
## 🔍 Focus Points (for reviewers)
I know it's a lot to sift through, so here is a list of **key points for reviewers**:
- The following files contain code that was mostly just relocated:
- `reflect_value.rs`
- `registration.rs`
- `container_attributes.rs` was also mostly moved but features some general cleanup (reducing nesting, removing hardcoded strings, etc.) and lots of doc comments
- Most impl logic was moved from `lib.rs` to `impls.rs`, but they have been significantly modified to use the new `ReflectDeriveData` metadata struct in order to reduce duplication.
- `derive_data.rs` and `field_attributes.rs` contain almost entirely new code and should probably be given the most attention.
- Likewise, `from_reflect.rs` saw major changes using `ReflectDeriveData` so it should also be given focus.
- There was no change to the `lib.rs` exports so the end-user API should be the same.
## Prior Work
This task was initially tackled by @NathanSWard in #2377 (which was closed in favor of this PR), so hats off to them for beating me to the punch by nearly a year!
---
## Changelog
* **[INTERNAL]** Split `bevy_reflect_derive` into smaller submodules
* **[INTERNAL]** Add `ReflectFieldAttr`
* **[INTERNAL]** Add `ReflectDeriveData`
* Add `BevyManifest::get_path_direct()` method (`bevy_macro_utils`)
Co-authored-by: MrGVSV <49806985+MrGVSV@users.noreply.github.com>
# Objective
Reduce from scratch build time.
## Solution
Reduce the size of the critical path by removing dependencies between crates where not necessary. For `cargo check --no-default-features` this reduced build time from ~51s to ~45s. For some commits I am not completely sure if the tradeoff between build time reduction and convenience caused by the commit is acceptable. If not, I can drop them.
A couple more uncontroversial changes extracted from #3886.
* Enable full feature of syn
It is necessary for the ItemFn and ItemTrait type. Currently it is indirectly
enabled through the tracing dependency of bevy_utils, but this may no
longer be the case in the future.
* Remove unused function from bevy_macro_utils
What is says on the tin.
This has got more to do with making `clippy` slightly more *quiet* than it does with changing anything that might greatly impact readability or performance.
that said, deriving `Default` for a couple of structs is a nice easy win
# Objective
Emitting compile errors produces cleaner messages than panicking in a proc-macro.
## Solution
- Replace match-with-panic code with call to new `bevy_macro_utils::get_named_struct_fields` function
- Replace one use of match-with-panic for enums with inline match
_Aside:_ I'm also the maintainer of [`darling`](https://docs.rs/darling), a crate which provides a serde-like API for parsing macro inputs. I avoided using it here because it seemed like overkill, but if there are plans to add lots more attributes/macros then that might be a good way of offloading macro error handling.
Modifies the code emitted by `derive_label` to use fully-qualified type
names (e.g. `std::boxed::Box` instead of `Box`).
# Objective
- Using unqualified types here causes errors when the proc macro is used in contexts that locally define types with conflicting names (e.g. a local definition of `Box`).
## Solution
- Fully qualify standard types emitted by the proc macro code.
# Objective
- Our crevice is still called "crevice", which we can't use for a release
- Users would need to use our "crevice" directly to be able to use the derive macro
## Solution
- Rename crevice to bevy_crevice, and crevice-derive to bevy-crevice-derive
- Re-export it from bevy_render, and use it from bevy_render everywhere
- Fix derive macro to work either from bevy_render, from bevy_crevice, or from bevy
## Remaining
- It is currently re-exported as `bevy::render::bevy_crevice`, is it the path we want?
- After a brief suggestion to Cart, I changed the version to follow Bevy version instead of crevice, do we want that?
- Crevice README.md need to be updated
- in the `Cargo.toml`, there are a few things to change. How do we want to change them? How do we keep attributions to original Crevice?
```
authors = ["Lucien Greathouse <me@lpghatguy.com>"]
documentation = "https://docs.rs/crevice"
homepage = "https://github.com/LPGhatguy/crevice"
repository = "https://github.com/LPGhatguy/crevice"
```
Co-authored-by: François <8672791+mockersf@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Carter Anderson <mcanders1@gmail.com>
# Problem
Let's say I am writting a simple bevy plugin, and I want to depend on `bevy_ecs` crate instead of depending on the full `bevy`.
So I write the following:
*Cargo.toml*:
```toml
[dependencies]
bevy_ecs = { git = "https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy.git", rev = "94db0176fecfac7e7e9763f2dc7458a54c105886" }
```
*lib.rs*:
```rust
use bevy_ecs::prelude::*;
#[derive(Debug, Default, Component)
pub struct MyFancyComponent;
```
So far, so good. Everything works. But let's say I want to write some examples for using my plugin. And for theses I'd like to use the `bevy` crate, so that I can write complete examples (rendering stuff, etc.) that are simple and look like what the consumer of my plugin will do (`use bevy::prelude::*` and `DefaultPlugins`)
So I amend my *Cargo.toml*:
```toml
[dependencies]
bevy_ecs = { git = "https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy.git", rev = "94db0176fecfac7e7e9763f2dc7458a54c105886" }
[dev-dependencies]
bevy = { git = "https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy.git", rev = "94db0176fecfac7e7e9763f2dc7458a54c105886", default-features = false }
```
And that leads to a complilation error
```
error[E0433]: failed to resolve: use of undeclared crate or module `bevy`
```
Basically, because `bevy` is in the `dev-dependencies`, the macro (of the production code) decides to use the `bevy::ecs` path instead of `bevy_ecs`. But `bevy` is not available there.
## Solution
This PR fixes the problem. I amend the macro utility responsible of finding the path of a module.
If we try to find a path, we first test if this correspond to a crate that the user directly depend on. (Like, if we search for `bevy_ecs`, we first check if there is a `bevy_ecs` dependency). If yes, we can depend on that directly. Otherwise, we proceed with the existing logic (testing `bevy` and `bevy_internal`)
This implements the most minimal variant of #1843 - a derive for marker trait. This is a prerequisite to more complicated features like statically defined storage type or opt-out component reflection.
In order to make component struct's purpose explicit and avoid misuse, it must be annotated with `#[derive(Component)]` (manual impl is discouraged for compatibility). Right now this is just a marker trait, but in the future it might be expanded. Making this change early allows us to make further changes later without breaking backward compatibility for derive macro users.
This already prevents a lot of issues, like using bundles in `insert` calls. Primitive types are no longer valid components as well. This can be easily worked around by adding newtype wrappers and deriving `Component` for them.
One funny example of prevented bad code (from our own tests) is when an newtype struct or enum variant is used. Previously, it was possible to write `insert(Newtype)` instead of `insert(Newtype(value))`. That code compiled, because function pointers (in this case newtype struct constructor) implement `Send + Sync + 'static`, so we allowed them to be used as components. This is no longer the case and such invalid code will trigger a compile error.
Co-authored-by: = <=>
Co-authored-by: TheRawMeatball <therawmeatball@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Carter Anderson <mcanders1@gmail.com>
This is a rather simple but wide change, and it involves adding a new `bevy_app_macros` crate. Let me know if there is a better way to do any of this!
---
# Objective
- Allow adding and accessing sub-apps by using a label instead of an index
## Solution
- Migrate the bevy label implementation and derive code to the `bevy_utils` and `bevy_macro_utils` crates and then add a new `SubAppLabel` trait to the `bevy_app` crate that is used when adding or getting a sub-app from an app.
