mirror of
https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy
synced 2024-11-22 04:33:37 +00:00
Add note on partial reviews (#13163)
# Objective Reviews with caveats are incredibly useful to maintainers when evaluating PRs. However, it's not generally clear to reviewers that conditional approvals or partial approvals are helpful and welcome. ## Solution Add clarifying documentation to CONTRIBUTING.md. --------- Co-authored-by: Alice Cecile <alice.i.cecil@gmail.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
b3ed0dd002
commit
c92eee848a
1 changed files with 10 additions and 1 deletions
|
@ -285,7 +285,16 @@ Larger changes deserve a comment in the main thread, or a pull request to the or
|
||||||
When in doubt about a matter of architectural philosophy, refer back to [*What we're trying to build*](#what-were-trying-to-build) for guidance.
|
When in doubt about a matter of architectural philosophy, refer back to [*What we're trying to build*](#what-were-trying-to-build) for guidance.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Once you're happy with the work and feel you're reasonably qualified to assess quality in this particular area, leave your `Approved` review on the PR.
|
Once you're happy with the work and feel you're reasonably qualified to assess quality in this particular area, leave your `Approved` review on the PR.
|
||||||
If you're new to GitHub, check out the [Pull Request Review documentation](https://docs.github.com/en/github/collaborating-with-pull-requests/reviewing-changes-in-pull-requests/about-pull-request-reviews). Anyone can leave reviews ... no special permissions are required!
|
If you're new to GitHub, check out the [Pull Request Review documentation](https://docs.github.com/en/github/collaborating-with-pull-requests/reviewing-changes-in-pull-requests/about-pull-request-reviews).
|
||||||
|
**Anyone** can and should leave reviews ... no special permissions are required!
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
It's okay to leave an approval even if you aren't 100% confident on all areas of the PR: just be sure to note your limitations.
|
||||||
|
When maintainers are evaluating the PR to be merged, they'll make sure that there's good coverage on all of the critical areas.
|
||||||
|
If you can only check that the math is correct, and another reviewer can check everything *but* the math, we're in good shape!
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Similarly, if there are areas that would be *good* to fix but aren't severe, please consider leaving an approval.
|
||||||
|
The author can address them immediately, or spin it out into follow-up issues or PRs.
|
||||||
|
Large PRs are much more draining for both reviewers and authors, so try to push for a smaller scope with clearly tracked follow-ups.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
There are three main places you can check for things to review:
|
There are three main places you can check for things to review:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue