Mirrors/bevy
2
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy synced 2024-12-24 12:03:14 +00:00
Code Issues Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity
bevy/examples/movement/physics_in_fixed_timestep.rs

252 lines
12 KiB
Rust
Raw Normal View History

Add an example for doing movement in fixed timesteps (#14223) _copy-pasted from my doc comment in the code_ # Objective This example shows how to properly handle player input, advance a physics simulation in a fixed timestep, and display the results. The classic source for how and why this is done is Glenn Fiedler's article [Fix Your Timestep!](https://gafferongames.com/post/fix_your_timestep/). ## Motivation The naive way of moving a player is to just update their position like so: ```rust transform.translation += velocity; ``` The issue here is that the player's movement speed will be tied to the frame rate. Faster machines will move the player faster, and slower machines will move the player slower. In fact, you can observe this today when running some old games that did it this way on modern hardware! The player will move at a breakneck pace. The more sophisticated way is to update the player's position based on the time that has passed: ```rust transform.translation += velocity * time.delta_seconds(); ``` This way, velocity represents a speed in units per second, and the player will move at the same speed regardless of the frame rate. However, this can still be problematic if the frame rate is very low or very high. If the frame rate is very low, the player will move in large jumps. This may lead to a player moving in such large jumps that they pass through walls or other obstacles. In general, you cannot expect a physics simulation to behave nicely with *any* delta time. Ideally, we want to have some stability in what kinds of delta times we feed into our physics simulation. The solution is using a fixed timestep. This means that we advance the physics simulation by a fixed amount at a time. If the real time that passed between two frames is less than the fixed timestep, we simply don't advance the physics simulation at all. If it is more, we advance the physics simulation multiple times until we catch up. You can read more about how Bevy implements this in the documentation for [`bevy::time::Fixed`](https://docs.rs/bevy/latest/bevy/time/struct.Fixed.html). This leaves us with a last problem, however. If our physics simulation may advance zero or multiple times per frame, there may be frames in which the player's position did not need to be updated at all, and some where it is updated by a large amount that resulted from running the physics simulation multiple times. This is physically correct, but visually jarring. Imagine a player moving in a straight line, but depending on the frame rate, they may sometimes advance by a large amount and sometimes not at all. Visually, we want the player to move smoothly. This is why we need to separate the player's position in the physics simulation from the player's position in the visual representation. The visual representation can then be interpolated smoothly based on the last and current actual player position in the physics simulation. This is a tradeoff: every visual frame is now slightly lagging behind the actual physical frame, but in return, the player's movement will appear smooth. There are other ways to compute the visual representation of the player, such as extrapolation. See the [documentation of the lightyear crate](https://cbournhonesque.github.io/lightyear/book/concepts/advanced_replication/visual_interpolation.html) for a nice overview of the different methods and their tradeoffs. ## Implementation - The player's velocity is stored in a `Velocity` component. This is the speed in units per second. - The player's current position in the physics simulation is stored in a `PhysicalTranslation` component. - The player's previous position in the physics simulation is stored in a `PreviousPhysicalTranslation` component. - The player's visual representation is stored in Bevy's regular `Transform` component. - Every frame, we go through the following steps: - Advance the physics simulation by one fixed timestep in the `advance_physics` system. This is run in the `FixedUpdate` schedule, which runs before the `Update` schedule. - Update the player's visual representation in the `update_displayed_transform` system. This interpolates between the player's previous and current position in the physics simulation. - Update the player's velocity based on the player's input in the `handle_input` system. ## Relevant Issues Related to #1259. I'm also fairly sure I've seen an issue somewhere made by @alice-i-cecile about showing how to move a character correctly in a fixed timestep, but I cannot find it.
2024-07-09 14:23:10 +00:00
//! This example shows how to properly handle player input,
//! advance a physics simulation in a fixed timestep, and display the results.
//!
//! The classic source for how and why this is done is Glenn Fiedler's article
//! [Fix Your Timestep!](https://gafferongames.com/post/fix_your_timestep/).
//! For a more Bevy-centric source, see
//! [this cheatbook entry](https://bevy-cheatbook.github.io/fundamentals/fixed-timestep.html).
//!
//! ## Motivation
//!
//! The naive way of moving a player is to just update their position like so:
//! ```no_run
//! transform.translation += velocity;
//! ```
//! The issue here is that the player's movement speed will be tied to the frame rate.
//! Faster machines will move the player faster, and slower machines will move the player slower.
//! In fact, you can observe this today when running some old games that did it this way on modern hardware!
//! The player will move at a breakneck pace.
//!
//! The more sophisticated way is to update the player's position based on the time that has passed:
//! ```no_run
//! transform.translation += velocity * time.delta_seconds();
//! ```
//! This way, velocity represents a speed in units per second, and the player will move at the same speed
//! regardless of the frame rate.
//!
//! However, this can still be problematic if the frame rate is very low or very high.
//! If the frame rate is very low, the player will move in large jumps. This may lead to
//! a player moving in such large jumps that they pass through walls or other obstacles.
//! In general, you cannot expect a physics simulation to behave nicely with *any* delta time.
//! Ideally, we want to have some stability in what kinds of delta times we feed into our physics simulation.
//!
//! The solution is using a fixed timestep. This means that we advance the physics simulation by a fixed amount
//! at a time. If the real time that passed between two frames is less than the fixed timestep, we simply
//! don't advance the physics simulation at all.
//! If it is more, we advance the physics simulation multiple times until we catch up.
//! You can read more about how Bevy implements this in the documentation for
//! [`bevy::time::Fixed`](https://docs.rs/bevy/latest/bevy/time/struct.Fixed.html).
//!
//! This leaves us with a last problem, however. If our physics simulation may advance zero or multiple times
//! per frame, there may be frames in which the player's position did not need to be updated at all,
//! and some where it is updated by a large amount that resulted from running the physics simulation multiple times.
//! This is physically correct, but visually jarring. Imagine a player moving in a straight line, but depending on the frame rate,
//! they may sometimes advance by a large amount and sometimes not at all. Visually, we want the player to move smoothly.
//! This is why we need to separate the player's position in the physics simulation from the player's position in the visual representation.
//! The visual representation can then be interpolated smoothly based on the previous and current actual player position in the physics simulation.
//!
//! This is a tradeoff: every visual frame is now slightly lagging behind the actual physical frame,
//! but in return, the player's movement will appear smooth.
//! There are other ways to compute the visual representation of the player, such as extrapolation.
//! See the [documentation of the lightyear crate](https://cbournhonesque.github.io/lightyear/book/concepts/advanced_replication/visual_interpolation.html)
//! for a nice overview of the different methods and their respective tradeoffs.
//!
//! ## Implementation
//!
Allow ordering variable timesteps around fixed timesteps (#14881) # Objective - Fixes #14873, see that issue for a whole lot of context ## Solution - Add a blessed system set for this stuff. See [this Discord discussion](https://discord.com/channels/691052431525675048/749335865876021248/1276262931327094908). Note that the gizmo systems, [LWIM](https://github.com/Leafwing-Studios/leafwing-input-manager/pull/522/files#diff-9b59ee4899ad0a5d008889ea89a124a7291316532e42f9f3d6ae842b906fb095R154) and now a new plugin I'm working on are all already ordering against `run_fixed_main_schedule`, so having a dedicated system set should be more robust and hopefully also more discoverable. --- ## ~~Showcase~~ ~~I can add a little video of a smooth camera later if this gets merged :)~~ Apparently a release note is not needed, so I'll leave it out. See the changes in the fixed timestep example for usage showcase and the video in #14873 for a more or less accurate video of the effect (it does not use the same solution though, so it is not quite the same) ## Migration Guide [run_fixed_main_schedule](https://docs.rs/bevy/latest/bevy/time/fn.run_fixed_main_schedule.html) is no longer public. If you used to order against it, use the new dedicated `RunFixedMainLoopSystem` system set instead. You can replace your usage of `run_fixed_main_schedule` one for one by `RunFixedMainLoopSystem::FixedMainLoop`, but it is now more idiomatic to place your systems in either `RunFixedMainLoopSystem::BeforeFixedMainLoop` or `RunFixedMainLoopSystem::AfterFixedMainLoop` Old: ```rust app.add_systems( RunFixedMainLoop, some_system.before(run_fixed_main_schedule) ); ``` New: ```rust app.add_systems( RunFixedMainLoop, some_system.in_set(RunFixedMainLoopSystem::BeforeFixedMainLoop) ); ``` --------- Co-authored-by: Tau Gärtli <git@tau.garden>
2024-08-23 16:19:42 +00:00
//! - The player's inputs since the last physics update are stored in the `AccumulatedInput` component.
Add an example for doing movement in fixed timesteps (#14223) _copy-pasted from my doc comment in the code_ # Objective This example shows how to properly handle player input, advance a physics simulation in a fixed timestep, and display the results. The classic source for how and why this is done is Glenn Fiedler's article [Fix Your Timestep!](https://gafferongames.com/post/fix_your_timestep/). ## Motivation The naive way of moving a player is to just update their position like so: ```rust transform.translation += velocity; ``` The issue here is that the player's movement speed will be tied to the frame rate. Faster machines will move the player faster, and slower machines will move the player slower. In fact, you can observe this today when running some old games that did it this way on modern hardware! The player will move at a breakneck pace. The more sophisticated way is to update the player's position based on the time that has passed: ```rust transform.translation += velocity * time.delta_seconds(); ``` This way, velocity represents a speed in units per second, and the player will move at the same speed regardless of the frame rate. However, this can still be problematic if the frame rate is very low or very high. If the frame rate is very low, the player will move in large jumps. This may lead to a player moving in such large jumps that they pass through walls or other obstacles. In general, you cannot expect a physics simulation to behave nicely with *any* delta time. Ideally, we want to have some stability in what kinds of delta times we feed into our physics simulation. The solution is using a fixed timestep. This means that we advance the physics simulation by a fixed amount at a time. If the real time that passed between two frames is less than the fixed timestep, we simply don't advance the physics simulation at all. If it is more, we advance the physics simulation multiple times until we catch up. You can read more about how Bevy implements this in the documentation for [`bevy::time::Fixed`](https://docs.rs/bevy/latest/bevy/time/struct.Fixed.html). This leaves us with a last problem, however. If our physics simulation may advance zero or multiple times per frame, there may be frames in which the player's position did not need to be updated at all, and some where it is updated by a large amount that resulted from running the physics simulation multiple times. This is physically correct, but visually jarring. Imagine a player moving in a straight line, but depending on the frame rate, they may sometimes advance by a large amount and sometimes not at all. Visually, we want the player to move smoothly. This is why we need to separate the player's position in the physics simulation from the player's position in the visual representation. The visual representation can then be interpolated smoothly based on the last and current actual player position in the physics simulation. This is a tradeoff: every visual frame is now slightly lagging behind the actual physical frame, but in return, the player's movement will appear smooth. There are other ways to compute the visual representation of the player, such as extrapolation. See the [documentation of the lightyear crate](https://cbournhonesque.github.io/lightyear/book/concepts/advanced_replication/visual_interpolation.html) for a nice overview of the different methods and their tradeoffs. ## Implementation - The player's velocity is stored in a `Velocity` component. This is the speed in units per second. - The player's current position in the physics simulation is stored in a `PhysicalTranslation` component. - The player's previous position in the physics simulation is stored in a `PreviousPhysicalTranslation` component. - The player's visual representation is stored in Bevy's regular `Transform` component. - Every frame, we go through the following steps: - Advance the physics simulation by one fixed timestep in the `advance_physics` system. This is run in the `FixedUpdate` schedule, which runs before the `Update` schedule. - Update the player's visual representation in the `update_displayed_transform` system. This interpolates between the player's previous and current position in the physics simulation. - Update the player's velocity based on the player's input in the `handle_input` system. ## Relevant Issues Related to #1259. I'm also fairly sure I've seen an issue somewhere made by @alice-i-cecile about showing how to move a character correctly in a fixed timestep, but I cannot find it.
2024-07-09 14:23:10 +00:00
//! - The player's velocity is stored in a `Velocity` component. This is the speed in units per second.
//! - The player's current position in the physics simulation is stored in a `PhysicalTranslation` component.
//! - The player's previous position in the physics simulation is stored in a `PreviousPhysicalTranslation` component.
//! - The player's visual representation is stored in Bevy's regular `Transform` component.
//! - Every frame, we go through the following steps:
Allow ordering variable timesteps around fixed timesteps (#14881) # Objective - Fixes #14873, see that issue for a whole lot of context ## Solution - Add a blessed system set for this stuff. See [this Discord discussion](https://discord.com/channels/691052431525675048/749335865876021248/1276262931327094908). Note that the gizmo systems, [LWIM](https://github.com/Leafwing-Studios/leafwing-input-manager/pull/522/files#diff-9b59ee4899ad0a5d008889ea89a124a7291316532e42f9f3d6ae842b906fb095R154) and now a new plugin I'm working on are all already ordering against `run_fixed_main_schedule`, so having a dedicated system set should be more robust and hopefully also more discoverable. --- ## ~~Showcase~~ ~~I can add a little video of a smooth camera later if this gets merged :)~~ Apparently a release note is not needed, so I'll leave it out. See the changes in the fixed timestep example for usage showcase and the video in #14873 for a more or less accurate video of the effect (it does not use the same solution though, so it is not quite the same) ## Migration Guide [run_fixed_main_schedule](https://docs.rs/bevy/latest/bevy/time/fn.run_fixed_main_schedule.html) is no longer public. If you used to order against it, use the new dedicated `RunFixedMainLoopSystem` system set instead. You can replace your usage of `run_fixed_main_schedule` one for one by `RunFixedMainLoopSystem::FixedMainLoop`, but it is now more idiomatic to place your systems in either `RunFixedMainLoopSystem::BeforeFixedMainLoop` or `RunFixedMainLoopSystem::AfterFixedMainLoop` Old: ```rust app.add_systems( RunFixedMainLoop, some_system.before(run_fixed_main_schedule) ); ``` New: ```rust app.add_systems( RunFixedMainLoop, some_system.in_set(RunFixedMainLoopSystem::BeforeFixedMainLoop) ); ``` --------- Co-authored-by: Tau Gärtli <git@tau.garden>
2024-08-23 16:19:42 +00:00
//! - Accumulate the player's input and set the current speed in the `handle_input` system.
//! This is run in the `RunFixedMainLoop` schedule, ordered in `RunFixedMainLoopSystem::BeforeFixedMainLoop`,
//! which runs before the fixed timestep loop. This is run every frame.
Add an example for doing movement in fixed timesteps (#14223) _copy-pasted from my doc comment in the code_ # Objective This example shows how to properly handle player input, advance a physics simulation in a fixed timestep, and display the results. The classic source for how and why this is done is Glenn Fiedler's article [Fix Your Timestep!](https://gafferongames.com/post/fix_your_timestep/). ## Motivation The naive way of moving a player is to just update their position like so: ```rust transform.translation += velocity; ``` The issue here is that the player's movement speed will be tied to the frame rate. Faster machines will move the player faster, and slower machines will move the player slower. In fact, you can observe this today when running some old games that did it this way on modern hardware! The player will move at a breakneck pace. The more sophisticated way is to update the player's position based on the time that has passed: ```rust transform.translation += velocity * time.delta_seconds(); ``` This way, velocity represents a speed in units per second, and the player will move at the same speed regardless of the frame rate. However, this can still be problematic if the frame rate is very low or very high. If the frame rate is very low, the player will move in large jumps. This may lead to a player moving in such large jumps that they pass through walls or other obstacles. In general, you cannot expect a physics simulation to behave nicely with *any* delta time. Ideally, we want to have some stability in what kinds of delta times we feed into our physics simulation. The solution is using a fixed timestep. This means that we advance the physics simulation by a fixed amount at a time. If the real time that passed between two frames is less than the fixed timestep, we simply don't advance the physics simulation at all. If it is more, we advance the physics simulation multiple times until we catch up. You can read more about how Bevy implements this in the documentation for [`bevy::time::Fixed`](https://docs.rs/bevy/latest/bevy/time/struct.Fixed.html). This leaves us with a last problem, however. If our physics simulation may advance zero or multiple times per frame, there may be frames in which the player's position did not need to be updated at all, and some where it is updated by a large amount that resulted from running the physics simulation multiple times. This is physically correct, but visually jarring. Imagine a player moving in a straight line, but depending on the frame rate, they may sometimes advance by a large amount and sometimes not at all. Visually, we want the player to move smoothly. This is why we need to separate the player's position in the physics simulation from the player's position in the visual representation. The visual representation can then be interpolated smoothly based on the last and current actual player position in the physics simulation. This is a tradeoff: every visual frame is now slightly lagging behind the actual physical frame, but in return, the player's movement will appear smooth. There are other ways to compute the visual representation of the player, such as extrapolation. See the [documentation of the lightyear crate](https://cbournhonesque.github.io/lightyear/book/concepts/advanced_replication/visual_interpolation.html) for a nice overview of the different methods and their tradeoffs. ## Implementation - The player's velocity is stored in a `Velocity` component. This is the speed in units per second. - The player's current position in the physics simulation is stored in a `PhysicalTranslation` component. - The player's previous position in the physics simulation is stored in a `PreviousPhysicalTranslation` component. - The player's visual representation is stored in Bevy's regular `Transform` component. - Every frame, we go through the following steps: - Advance the physics simulation by one fixed timestep in the `advance_physics` system. This is run in the `FixedUpdate` schedule, which runs before the `Update` schedule. - Update the player's visual representation in the `update_displayed_transform` system. This interpolates between the player's previous and current position in the physics simulation. - Update the player's velocity based on the player's input in the `handle_input` system. ## Relevant Issues Related to #1259. I'm also fairly sure I've seen an issue somewhere made by @alice-i-cecile about showing how to move a character correctly in a fixed timestep, but I cannot find it.
2024-07-09 14:23:10 +00:00
//! - Advance the physics simulation by one fixed timestep in the `advance_physics` system.
Allow ordering variable timesteps around fixed timesteps (#14881) # Objective - Fixes #14873, see that issue for a whole lot of context ## Solution - Add a blessed system set for this stuff. See [this Discord discussion](https://discord.com/channels/691052431525675048/749335865876021248/1276262931327094908). Note that the gizmo systems, [LWIM](https://github.com/Leafwing-Studios/leafwing-input-manager/pull/522/files#diff-9b59ee4899ad0a5d008889ea89a124a7291316532e42f9f3d6ae842b906fb095R154) and now a new plugin I'm working on are all already ordering against `run_fixed_main_schedule`, so having a dedicated system set should be more robust and hopefully also more discoverable. --- ## ~~Showcase~~ ~~I can add a little video of a smooth camera later if this gets merged :)~~ Apparently a release note is not needed, so I'll leave it out. See the changes in the fixed timestep example for usage showcase and the video in #14873 for a more or less accurate video of the effect (it does not use the same solution though, so it is not quite the same) ## Migration Guide [run_fixed_main_schedule](https://docs.rs/bevy/latest/bevy/time/fn.run_fixed_main_schedule.html) is no longer public. If you used to order against it, use the new dedicated `RunFixedMainLoopSystem` system set instead. You can replace your usage of `run_fixed_main_schedule` one for one by `RunFixedMainLoopSystem::FixedMainLoop`, but it is now more idiomatic to place your systems in either `RunFixedMainLoopSystem::BeforeFixedMainLoop` or `RunFixedMainLoopSystem::AfterFixedMainLoop` Old: ```rust app.add_systems( RunFixedMainLoop, some_system.before(run_fixed_main_schedule) ); ``` New: ```rust app.add_systems( RunFixedMainLoop, some_system.in_set(RunFixedMainLoopSystem::BeforeFixedMainLoop) ); ``` --------- Co-authored-by: Tau Gärtli <git@tau.garden>
2024-08-23 16:19:42 +00:00
//! Accumulated input is consumed here.
//! This is run in the `FixedUpdate` schedule, which runs zero or multiple times per frame.
//! - Update the player's visual representation in the `interpolate_rendered_transform` system.
Add an example for doing movement in fixed timesteps (#14223) _copy-pasted from my doc comment in the code_ # Objective This example shows how to properly handle player input, advance a physics simulation in a fixed timestep, and display the results. The classic source for how and why this is done is Glenn Fiedler's article [Fix Your Timestep!](https://gafferongames.com/post/fix_your_timestep/). ## Motivation The naive way of moving a player is to just update their position like so: ```rust transform.translation += velocity; ``` The issue here is that the player's movement speed will be tied to the frame rate. Faster machines will move the player faster, and slower machines will move the player slower. In fact, you can observe this today when running some old games that did it this way on modern hardware! The player will move at a breakneck pace. The more sophisticated way is to update the player's position based on the time that has passed: ```rust transform.translation += velocity * time.delta_seconds(); ``` This way, velocity represents a speed in units per second, and the player will move at the same speed regardless of the frame rate. However, this can still be problematic if the frame rate is very low or very high. If the frame rate is very low, the player will move in large jumps. This may lead to a player moving in such large jumps that they pass through walls or other obstacles. In general, you cannot expect a physics simulation to behave nicely with *any* delta time. Ideally, we want to have some stability in what kinds of delta times we feed into our physics simulation. The solution is using a fixed timestep. This means that we advance the physics simulation by a fixed amount at a time. If the real time that passed between two frames is less than the fixed timestep, we simply don't advance the physics simulation at all. If it is more, we advance the physics simulation multiple times until we catch up. You can read more about how Bevy implements this in the documentation for [`bevy::time::Fixed`](https://docs.rs/bevy/latest/bevy/time/struct.Fixed.html). This leaves us with a last problem, however. If our physics simulation may advance zero or multiple times per frame, there may be frames in which the player's position did not need to be updated at all, and some where it is updated by a large amount that resulted from running the physics simulation multiple times. This is physically correct, but visually jarring. Imagine a player moving in a straight line, but depending on the frame rate, they may sometimes advance by a large amount and sometimes not at all. Visually, we want the player to move smoothly. This is why we need to separate the player's position in the physics simulation from the player's position in the visual representation. The visual representation can then be interpolated smoothly based on the last and current actual player position in the physics simulation. This is a tradeoff: every visual frame is now slightly lagging behind the actual physical frame, but in return, the player's movement will appear smooth. There are other ways to compute the visual representation of the player, such as extrapolation. See the [documentation of the lightyear crate](https://cbournhonesque.github.io/lightyear/book/concepts/advanced_replication/visual_interpolation.html) for a nice overview of the different methods and their tradeoffs. ## Implementation - The player's velocity is stored in a `Velocity` component. This is the speed in units per second. - The player's current position in the physics simulation is stored in a `PhysicalTranslation` component. - The player's previous position in the physics simulation is stored in a `PreviousPhysicalTranslation` component. - The player's visual representation is stored in Bevy's regular `Transform` component. - Every frame, we go through the following steps: - Advance the physics simulation by one fixed timestep in the `advance_physics` system. This is run in the `FixedUpdate` schedule, which runs before the `Update` schedule. - Update the player's visual representation in the `update_displayed_transform` system. This interpolates between the player's previous and current position in the physics simulation. - Update the player's velocity based on the player's input in the `handle_input` system. ## Relevant Issues Related to #1259. I'm also fairly sure I've seen an issue somewhere made by @alice-i-cecile about showing how to move a character correctly in a fixed timestep, but I cannot find it.
2024-07-09 14:23:10 +00:00
//! This interpolates between the player's previous and current position in the physics simulation.
Allow ordering variable timesteps around fixed timesteps (#14881) # Objective - Fixes #14873, see that issue for a whole lot of context ## Solution - Add a blessed system set for this stuff. See [this Discord discussion](https://discord.com/channels/691052431525675048/749335865876021248/1276262931327094908). Note that the gizmo systems, [LWIM](https://github.com/Leafwing-Studios/leafwing-input-manager/pull/522/files#diff-9b59ee4899ad0a5d008889ea89a124a7291316532e42f9f3d6ae842b906fb095R154) and now a new plugin I'm working on are all already ordering against `run_fixed_main_schedule`, so having a dedicated system set should be more robust and hopefully also more discoverable. --- ## ~~Showcase~~ ~~I can add a little video of a smooth camera later if this gets merged :)~~ Apparently a release note is not needed, so I'll leave it out. See the changes in the fixed timestep example for usage showcase and the video in #14873 for a more or less accurate video of the effect (it does not use the same solution though, so it is not quite the same) ## Migration Guide [run_fixed_main_schedule](https://docs.rs/bevy/latest/bevy/time/fn.run_fixed_main_schedule.html) is no longer public. If you used to order against it, use the new dedicated `RunFixedMainLoopSystem` system set instead. You can replace your usage of `run_fixed_main_schedule` one for one by `RunFixedMainLoopSystem::FixedMainLoop`, but it is now more idiomatic to place your systems in either `RunFixedMainLoopSystem::BeforeFixedMainLoop` or `RunFixedMainLoopSystem::AfterFixedMainLoop` Old: ```rust app.add_systems( RunFixedMainLoop, some_system.before(run_fixed_main_schedule) ); ``` New: ```rust app.add_systems( RunFixedMainLoop, some_system.in_set(RunFixedMainLoopSystem::BeforeFixedMainLoop) ); ``` --------- Co-authored-by: Tau Gärtli <git@tau.garden>
2024-08-23 16:19:42 +00:00
//! It is run in the `RunFixedMainLoop` schedule, ordered in `RunFixedMainLoopSystem::AfterFixedMainLoop`,
//! which runs after the fixed timestep loop. This is run every frame.
Add an example for doing movement in fixed timesteps (#14223) _copy-pasted from my doc comment in the code_ # Objective This example shows how to properly handle player input, advance a physics simulation in a fixed timestep, and display the results. The classic source for how and why this is done is Glenn Fiedler's article [Fix Your Timestep!](https://gafferongames.com/post/fix_your_timestep/). ## Motivation The naive way of moving a player is to just update their position like so: ```rust transform.translation += velocity; ``` The issue here is that the player's movement speed will be tied to the frame rate. Faster machines will move the player faster, and slower machines will move the player slower. In fact, you can observe this today when running some old games that did it this way on modern hardware! The player will move at a breakneck pace. The more sophisticated way is to update the player's position based on the time that has passed: ```rust transform.translation += velocity * time.delta_seconds(); ``` This way, velocity represents a speed in units per second, and the player will move at the same speed regardless of the frame rate. However, this can still be problematic if the frame rate is very low or very high. If the frame rate is very low, the player will move in large jumps. This may lead to a player moving in such large jumps that they pass through walls or other obstacles. In general, you cannot expect a physics simulation to behave nicely with *any* delta time. Ideally, we want to have some stability in what kinds of delta times we feed into our physics simulation. The solution is using a fixed timestep. This means that we advance the physics simulation by a fixed amount at a time. If the real time that passed between two frames is less than the fixed timestep, we simply don't advance the physics simulation at all. If it is more, we advance the physics simulation multiple times until we catch up. You can read more about how Bevy implements this in the documentation for [`bevy::time::Fixed`](https://docs.rs/bevy/latest/bevy/time/struct.Fixed.html). This leaves us with a last problem, however. If our physics simulation may advance zero or multiple times per frame, there may be frames in which the player's position did not need to be updated at all, and some where it is updated by a large amount that resulted from running the physics simulation multiple times. This is physically correct, but visually jarring. Imagine a player moving in a straight line, but depending on the frame rate, they may sometimes advance by a large amount and sometimes not at all. Visually, we want the player to move smoothly. This is why we need to separate the player's position in the physics simulation from the player's position in the visual representation. The visual representation can then be interpolated smoothly based on the last and current actual player position in the physics simulation. This is a tradeoff: every visual frame is now slightly lagging behind the actual physical frame, but in return, the player's movement will appear smooth. There are other ways to compute the visual representation of the player, such as extrapolation. See the [documentation of the lightyear crate](https://cbournhonesque.github.io/lightyear/book/concepts/advanced_replication/visual_interpolation.html) for a nice overview of the different methods and their tradeoffs. ## Implementation - The player's velocity is stored in a `Velocity` component. This is the speed in units per second. - The player's current position in the physics simulation is stored in a `PhysicalTranslation` component. - The player's previous position in the physics simulation is stored in a `PreviousPhysicalTranslation` component. - The player's visual representation is stored in Bevy's regular `Transform` component. - Every frame, we go through the following steps: - Advance the physics simulation by one fixed timestep in the `advance_physics` system. This is run in the `FixedUpdate` schedule, which runs before the `Update` schedule. - Update the player's visual representation in the `update_displayed_transform` system. This interpolates between the player's previous and current position in the physics simulation. - Update the player's velocity based on the player's input in the `handle_input` system. ## Relevant Issues Related to #1259. I'm also fairly sure I've seen an issue somewhere made by @alice-i-cecile about showing how to move a character correctly in a fixed timestep, but I cannot find it.
2024-07-09 14:23:10 +00:00
//!
//!
//! ## Controls
//!
//! | Key Binding | Action |
//! |:---------------------|:--------------|
//! | `W` | Move up |
//! | `S` | Move down |
//! | `A` | Move left |
//! | `D` | Move right |
use bevy::prelude::*;
fn main() {
App::new()
.add_plugins(DefaultPlugins)
.add_systems(Startup, (spawn_text, spawn_player))
Allow ordering variable timesteps around fixed timesteps (#14881) # Objective - Fixes #14873, see that issue for a whole lot of context ## Solution - Add a blessed system set for this stuff. See [this Discord discussion](https://discord.com/channels/691052431525675048/749335865876021248/1276262931327094908). Note that the gizmo systems, [LWIM](https://github.com/Leafwing-Studios/leafwing-input-manager/pull/522/files#diff-9b59ee4899ad0a5d008889ea89a124a7291316532e42f9f3d6ae842b906fb095R154) and now a new plugin I'm working on are all already ordering against `run_fixed_main_schedule`, so having a dedicated system set should be more robust and hopefully also more discoverable. --- ## ~~Showcase~~ ~~I can add a little video of a smooth camera later if this gets merged :)~~ Apparently a release note is not needed, so I'll leave it out. See the changes in the fixed timestep example for usage showcase and the video in #14873 for a more or less accurate video of the effect (it does not use the same solution though, so it is not quite the same) ## Migration Guide [run_fixed_main_schedule](https://docs.rs/bevy/latest/bevy/time/fn.run_fixed_main_schedule.html) is no longer public. If you used to order against it, use the new dedicated `RunFixedMainLoopSystem` system set instead. You can replace your usage of `run_fixed_main_schedule` one for one by `RunFixedMainLoopSystem::FixedMainLoop`, but it is now more idiomatic to place your systems in either `RunFixedMainLoopSystem::BeforeFixedMainLoop` or `RunFixedMainLoopSystem::AfterFixedMainLoop` Old: ```rust app.add_systems( RunFixedMainLoop, some_system.before(run_fixed_main_schedule) ); ``` New: ```rust app.add_systems( RunFixedMainLoop, some_system.in_set(RunFixedMainLoopSystem::BeforeFixedMainLoop) ); ``` --------- Co-authored-by: Tau Gärtli <git@tau.garden>
2024-08-23 16:19:42 +00:00
// Advance the physics simulation using a fixed timestep.
Add an example for doing movement in fixed timesteps (#14223) _copy-pasted from my doc comment in the code_ # Objective This example shows how to properly handle player input, advance a physics simulation in a fixed timestep, and display the results. The classic source for how and why this is done is Glenn Fiedler's article [Fix Your Timestep!](https://gafferongames.com/post/fix_your_timestep/). ## Motivation The naive way of moving a player is to just update their position like so: ```rust transform.translation += velocity; ``` The issue here is that the player's movement speed will be tied to the frame rate. Faster machines will move the player faster, and slower machines will move the player slower. In fact, you can observe this today when running some old games that did it this way on modern hardware! The player will move at a breakneck pace. The more sophisticated way is to update the player's position based on the time that has passed: ```rust transform.translation += velocity * time.delta_seconds(); ``` This way, velocity represents a speed in units per second, and the player will move at the same speed regardless of the frame rate. However, this can still be problematic if the frame rate is very low or very high. If the frame rate is very low, the player will move in large jumps. This may lead to a player moving in such large jumps that they pass through walls or other obstacles. In general, you cannot expect a physics simulation to behave nicely with *any* delta time. Ideally, we want to have some stability in what kinds of delta times we feed into our physics simulation. The solution is using a fixed timestep. This means that we advance the physics simulation by a fixed amount at a time. If the real time that passed between two frames is less than the fixed timestep, we simply don't advance the physics simulation at all. If it is more, we advance the physics simulation multiple times until we catch up. You can read more about how Bevy implements this in the documentation for [`bevy::time::Fixed`](https://docs.rs/bevy/latest/bevy/time/struct.Fixed.html). This leaves us with a last problem, however. If our physics simulation may advance zero or multiple times per frame, there may be frames in which the player's position did not need to be updated at all, and some where it is updated by a large amount that resulted from running the physics simulation multiple times. This is physically correct, but visually jarring. Imagine a player moving in a straight line, but depending on the frame rate, they may sometimes advance by a large amount and sometimes not at all. Visually, we want the player to move smoothly. This is why we need to separate the player's position in the physics simulation from the player's position in the visual representation. The visual representation can then be interpolated smoothly based on the last and current actual player position in the physics simulation. This is a tradeoff: every visual frame is now slightly lagging behind the actual physical frame, but in return, the player's movement will appear smooth. There are other ways to compute the visual representation of the player, such as extrapolation. See the [documentation of the lightyear crate](https://cbournhonesque.github.io/lightyear/book/concepts/advanced_replication/visual_interpolation.html) for a nice overview of the different methods and their tradeoffs. ## Implementation - The player's velocity is stored in a `Velocity` component. This is the speed in units per second. - The player's current position in the physics simulation is stored in a `PhysicalTranslation` component. - The player's previous position in the physics simulation is stored in a `PreviousPhysicalTranslation` component. - The player's visual representation is stored in Bevy's regular `Transform` component. - Every frame, we go through the following steps: - Advance the physics simulation by one fixed timestep in the `advance_physics` system. This is run in the `FixedUpdate` schedule, which runs before the `Update` schedule. - Update the player's visual representation in the `update_displayed_transform` system. This interpolates between the player's previous and current position in the physics simulation. - Update the player's velocity based on the player's input in the `handle_input` system. ## Relevant Issues Related to #1259. I'm also fairly sure I've seen an issue somewhere made by @alice-i-cecile about showing how to move a character correctly in a fixed timestep, but I cannot find it.
2024-07-09 14:23:10 +00:00
.add_systems(FixedUpdate, advance_physics)
Allow ordering variable timesteps around fixed timesteps (#14881) # Objective - Fixes #14873, see that issue for a whole lot of context ## Solution - Add a blessed system set for this stuff. See [this Discord discussion](https://discord.com/channels/691052431525675048/749335865876021248/1276262931327094908). Note that the gizmo systems, [LWIM](https://github.com/Leafwing-Studios/leafwing-input-manager/pull/522/files#diff-9b59ee4899ad0a5d008889ea89a124a7291316532e42f9f3d6ae842b906fb095R154) and now a new plugin I'm working on are all already ordering against `run_fixed_main_schedule`, so having a dedicated system set should be more robust and hopefully also more discoverable. --- ## ~~Showcase~~ ~~I can add a little video of a smooth camera later if this gets merged :)~~ Apparently a release note is not needed, so I'll leave it out. See the changes in the fixed timestep example for usage showcase and the video in #14873 for a more or less accurate video of the effect (it does not use the same solution though, so it is not quite the same) ## Migration Guide [run_fixed_main_schedule](https://docs.rs/bevy/latest/bevy/time/fn.run_fixed_main_schedule.html) is no longer public. If you used to order against it, use the new dedicated `RunFixedMainLoopSystem` system set instead. You can replace your usage of `run_fixed_main_schedule` one for one by `RunFixedMainLoopSystem::FixedMainLoop`, but it is now more idiomatic to place your systems in either `RunFixedMainLoopSystem::BeforeFixedMainLoop` or `RunFixedMainLoopSystem::AfterFixedMainLoop` Old: ```rust app.add_systems( RunFixedMainLoop, some_system.before(run_fixed_main_schedule) ); ``` New: ```rust app.add_systems( RunFixedMainLoop, some_system.in_set(RunFixedMainLoopSystem::BeforeFixedMainLoop) ); ``` --------- Co-authored-by: Tau Gärtli <git@tau.garden>
2024-08-23 16:19:42 +00:00
.add_systems(
// The `RunFixedMainLoop` schedule allows us to schedule systems to run before and after the fixed timestep loop.
RunFixedMainLoop,
(
// The physics simulation needs to know the player's input, so we run this before the fixed timestep loop.
// Note that if we ran it in `Update`, it would be too late, as the physics simulation would already have been advanced.
// If we ran this in `FixedUpdate`, it would sometimes not register player input, as that schedule may run zero times per frame.
handle_input.in_set(RunFixedMainLoopSystem::BeforeFixedMainLoop),
// The player's visual representation needs to be updated after the physics simulation has been advanced.
// This could be run in `Update`, but if we run it here instead, the systems in `Update`
// will be working with the `Transform` that will actually be shown on screen.
interpolate_rendered_transform.in_set(RunFixedMainLoopSystem::AfterFixedMainLoop),
),
)
Add an example for doing movement in fixed timesteps (#14223) _copy-pasted from my doc comment in the code_ # Objective This example shows how to properly handle player input, advance a physics simulation in a fixed timestep, and display the results. The classic source for how and why this is done is Glenn Fiedler's article [Fix Your Timestep!](https://gafferongames.com/post/fix_your_timestep/). ## Motivation The naive way of moving a player is to just update their position like so: ```rust transform.translation += velocity; ``` The issue here is that the player's movement speed will be tied to the frame rate. Faster machines will move the player faster, and slower machines will move the player slower. In fact, you can observe this today when running some old games that did it this way on modern hardware! The player will move at a breakneck pace. The more sophisticated way is to update the player's position based on the time that has passed: ```rust transform.translation += velocity * time.delta_seconds(); ``` This way, velocity represents a speed in units per second, and the player will move at the same speed regardless of the frame rate. However, this can still be problematic if the frame rate is very low or very high. If the frame rate is very low, the player will move in large jumps. This may lead to a player moving in such large jumps that they pass through walls or other obstacles. In general, you cannot expect a physics simulation to behave nicely with *any* delta time. Ideally, we want to have some stability in what kinds of delta times we feed into our physics simulation. The solution is using a fixed timestep. This means that we advance the physics simulation by a fixed amount at a time. If the real time that passed between two frames is less than the fixed timestep, we simply don't advance the physics simulation at all. If it is more, we advance the physics simulation multiple times until we catch up. You can read more about how Bevy implements this in the documentation for [`bevy::time::Fixed`](https://docs.rs/bevy/latest/bevy/time/struct.Fixed.html). This leaves us with a last problem, however. If our physics simulation may advance zero or multiple times per frame, there may be frames in which the player's position did not need to be updated at all, and some where it is updated by a large amount that resulted from running the physics simulation multiple times. This is physically correct, but visually jarring. Imagine a player moving in a straight line, but depending on the frame rate, they may sometimes advance by a large amount and sometimes not at all. Visually, we want the player to move smoothly. This is why we need to separate the player's position in the physics simulation from the player's position in the visual representation. The visual representation can then be interpolated smoothly based on the last and current actual player position in the physics simulation. This is a tradeoff: every visual frame is now slightly lagging behind the actual physical frame, but in return, the player's movement will appear smooth. There are other ways to compute the visual representation of the player, such as extrapolation. See the [documentation of the lightyear crate](https://cbournhonesque.github.io/lightyear/book/concepts/advanced_replication/visual_interpolation.html) for a nice overview of the different methods and their tradeoffs. ## Implementation - The player's velocity is stored in a `Velocity` component. This is the speed in units per second. - The player's current position in the physics simulation is stored in a `PhysicalTranslation` component. - The player's previous position in the physics simulation is stored in a `PreviousPhysicalTranslation` component. - The player's visual representation is stored in Bevy's regular `Transform` component. - Every frame, we go through the following steps: - Advance the physics simulation by one fixed timestep in the `advance_physics` system. This is run in the `FixedUpdate` schedule, which runs before the `Update` schedule. - Update the player's visual representation in the `update_displayed_transform` system. This interpolates between the player's previous and current position in the physics simulation. - Update the player's velocity based on the player's input in the `handle_input` system. ## Relevant Issues Related to #1259. I'm also fairly sure I've seen an issue somewhere made by @alice-i-cecile about showing how to move a character correctly in a fixed timestep, but I cannot find it.
2024-07-09 14:23:10 +00:00
.run();
}
Allow ordering variable timesteps around fixed timesteps (#14881) # Objective - Fixes #14873, see that issue for a whole lot of context ## Solution - Add a blessed system set for this stuff. See [this Discord discussion](https://discord.com/channels/691052431525675048/749335865876021248/1276262931327094908). Note that the gizmo systems, [LWIM](https://github.com/Leafwing-Studios/leafwing-input-manager/pull/522/files#diff-9b59ee4899ad0a5d008889ea89a124a7291316532e42f9f3d6ae842b906fb095R154) and now a new plugin I'm working on are all already ordering against `run_fixed_main_schedule`, so having a dedicated system set should be more robust and hopefully also more discoverable. --- ## ~~Showcase~~ ~~I can add a little video of a smooth camera later if this gets merged :)~~ Apparently a release note is not needed, so I'll leave it out. See the changes in the fixed timestep example for usage showcase and the video in #14873 for a more or less accurate video of the effect (it does not use the same solution though, so it is not quite the same) ## Migration Guide [run_fixed_main_schedule](https://docs.rs/bevy/latest/bevy/time/fn.run_fixed_main_schedule.html) is no longer public. If you used to order against it, use the new dedicated `RunFixedMainLoopSystem` system set instead. You can replace your usage of `run_fixed_main_schedule` one for one by `RunFixedMainLoopSystem::FixedMainLoop`, but it is now more idiomatic to place your systems in either `RunFixedMainLoopSystem::BeforeFixedMainLoop` or `RunFixedMainLoopSystem::AfterFixedMainLoop` Old: ```rust app.add_systems( RunFixedMainLoop, some_system.before(run_fixed_main_schedule) ); ``` New: ```rust app.add_systems( RunFixedMainLoop, some_system.in_set(RunFixedMainLoopSystem::BeforeFixedMainLoop) ); ``` --------- Co-authored-by: Tau Gärtli <git@tau.garden>
2024-08-23 16:19:42 +00:00
/// A vector representing the player's input, accumulated over all frames that ran
/// since the last time the physics simulation was advanced.
#[derive(Debug, Component, Clone, Copy, PartialEq, Default, Deref, DerefMut)]
struct AccumulatedInput(Vec2);
/// A vector representing the player's velocity in the physics simulation.
Add an example for doing movement in fixed timesteps (#14223) _copy-pasted from my doc comment in the code_ # Objective This example shows how to properly handle player input, advance a physics simulation in a fixed timestep, and display the results. The classic source for how and why this is done is Glenn Fiedler's article [Fix Your Timestep!](https://gafferongames.com/post/fix_your_timestep/). ## Motivation The naive way of moving a player is to just update their position like so: ```rust transform.translation += velocity; ``` The issue here is that the player's movement speed will be tied to the frame rate. Faster machines will move the player faster, and slower machines will move the player slower. In fact, you can observe this today when running some old games that did it this way on modern hardware! The player will move at a breakneck pace. The more sophisticated way is to update the player's position based on the time that has passed: ```rust transform.translation += velocity * time.delta_seconds(); ``` This way, velocity represents a speed in units per second, and the player will move at the same speed regardless of the frame rate. However, this can still be problematic if the frame rate is very low or very high. If the frame rate is very low, the player will move in large jumps. This may lead to a player moving in such large jumps that they pass through walls or other obstacles. In general, you cannot expect a physics simulation to behave nicely with *any* delta time. Ideally, we want to have some stability in what kinds of delta times we feed into our physics simulation. The solution is using a fixed timestep. This means that we advance the physics simulation by a fixed amount at a time. If the real time that passed between two frames is less than the fixed timestep, we simply don't advance the physics simulation at all. If it is more, we advance the physics simulation multiple times until we catch up. You can read more about how Bevy implements this in the documentation for [`bevy::time::Fixed`](https://docs.rs/bevy/latest/bevy/time/struct.Fixed.html). This leaves us with a last problem, however. If our physics simulation may advance zero or multiple times per frame, there may be frames in which the player's position did not need to be updated at all, and some where it is updated by a large amount that resulted from running the physics simulation multiple times. This is physically correct, but visually jarring. Imagine a player moving in a straight line, but depending on the frame rate, they may sometimes advance by a large amount and sometimes not at all. Visually, we want the player to move smoothly. This is why we need to separate the player's position in the physics simulation from the player's position in the visual representation. The visual representation can then be interpolated smoothly based on the last and current actual player position in the physics simulation. This is a tradeoff: every visual frame is now slightly lagging behind the actual physical frame, but in return, the player's movement will appear smooth. There are other ways to compute the visual representation of the player, such as extrapolation. See the [documentation of the lightyear crate](https://cbournhonesque.github.io/lightyear/book/concepts/advanced_replication/visual_interpolation.html) for a nice overview of the different methods and their tradeoffs. ## Implementation - The player's velocity is stored in a `Velocity` component. This is the speed in units per second. - The player's current position in the physics simulation is stored in a `PhysicalTranslation` component. - The player's previous position in the physics simulation is stored in a `PreviousPhysicalTranslation` component. - The player's visual representation is stored in Bevy's regular `Transform` component. - Every frame, we go through the following steps: - Advance the physics simulation by one fixed timestep in the `advance_physics` system. This is run in the `FixedUpdate` schedule, which runs before the `Update` schedule. - Update the player's visual representation in the `update_displayed_transform` system. This interpolates between the player's previous and current position in the physics simulation. - Update the player's velocity based on the player's input in the `handle_input` system. ## Relevant Issues Related to #1259. I'm also fairly sure I've seen an issue somewhere made by @alice-i-cecile about showing how to move a character correctly in a fixed timestep, but I cannot find it.
2024-07-09 14:23:10 +00:00
#[derive(Debug, Component, Clone, Copy, PartialEq, Default, Deref, DerefMut)]
struct Velocity(Vec3);
/// The actual position of the player in the physics simulation.
/// This is separate from the `Transform`, which is merely a visual representation.
///
/// If you want to make sure that this component is always initialized
/// with the same value as the `Transform`'s translation, you can
/// use a [component lifecycle hook](https://docs.rs/bevy/0.14.0/bevy/ecs/component/struct.ComponentHooks.html)
#[derive(Debug, Component, Clone, Copy, PartialEq, Default, Deref, DerefMut)]
struct PhysicalTranslation(Vec3);
/// The value [`PhysicalTranslation`] had in the last fixed timestep.
Allow ordering variable timesteps around fixed timesteps (#14881) # Objective - Fixes #14873, see that issue for a whole lot of context ## Solution - Add a blessed system set for this stuff. See [this Discord discussion](https://discord.com/channels/691052431525675048/749335865876021248/1276262931327094908). Note that the gizmo systems, [LWIM](https://github.com/Leafwing-Studios/leafwing-input-manager/pull/522/files#diff-9b59ee4899ad0a5d008889ea89a124a7291316532e42f9f3d6ae842b906fb095R154) and now a new plugin I'm working on are all already ordering against `run_fixed_main_schedule`, so having a dedicated system set should be more robust and hopefully also more discoverable. --- ## ~~Showcase~~ ~~I can add a little video of a smooth camera later if this gets merged :)~~ Apparently a release note is not needed, so I'll leave it out. See the changes in the fixed timestep example for usage showcase and the video in #14873 for a more or less accurate video of the effect (it does not use the same solution though, so it is not quite the same) ## Migration Guide [run_fixed_main_schedule](https://docs.rs/bevy/latest/bevy/time/fn.run_fixed_main_schedule.html) is no longer public. If you used to order against it, use the new dedicated `RunFixedMainLoopSystem` system set instead. You can replace your usage of `run_fixed_main_schedule` one for one by `RunFixedMainLoopSystem::FixedMainLoop`, but it is now more idiomatic to place your systems in either `RunFixedMainLoopSystem::BeforeFixedMainLoop` or `RunFixedMainLoopSystem::AfterFixedMainLoop` Old: ```rust app.add_systems( RunFixedMainLoop, some_system.before(run_fixed_main_schedule) ); ``` New: ```rust app.add_systems( RunFixedMainLoop, some_system.in_set(RunFixedMainLoopSystem::BeforeFixedMainLoop) ); ``` --------- Co-authored-by: Tau Gärtli <git@tau.garden>
2024-08-23 16:19:42 +00:00
/// Used for interpolation in the `interpolate_rendered_transform` system.
Add an example for doing movement in fixed timesteps (#14223) _copy-pasted from my doc comment in the code_ # Objective This example shows how to properly handle player input, advance a physics simulation in a fixed timestep, and display the results. The classic source for how and why this is done is Glenn Fiedler's article [Fix Your Timestep!](https://gafferongames.com/post/fix_your_timestep/). ## Motivation The naive way of moving a player is to just update their position like so: ```rust transform.translation += velocity; ``` The issue here is that the player's movement speed will be tied to the frame rate. Faster machines will move the player faster, and slower machines will move the player slower. In fact, you can observe this today when running some old games that did it this way on modern hardware! The player will move at a breakneck pace. The more sophisticated way is to update the player's position based on the time that has passed: ```rust transform.translation += velocity * time.delta_seconds(); ``` This way, velocity represents a speed in units per second, and the player will move at the same speed regardless of the frame rate. However, this can still be problematic if the frame rate is very low or very high. If the frame rate is very low, the player will move in large jumps. This may lead to a player moving in such large jumps that they pass through walls or other obstacles. In general, you cannot expect a physics simulation to behave nicely with *any* delta time. Ideally, we want to have some stability in what kinds of delta times we feed into our physics simulation. The solution is using a fixed timestep. This means that we advance the physics simulation by a fixed amount at a time. If the real time that passed between two frames is less than the fixed timestep, we simply don't advance the physics simulation at all. If it is more, we advance the physics simulation multiple times until we catch up. You can read more about how Bevy implements this in the documentation for [`bevy::time::Fixed`](https://docs.rs/bevy/latest/bevy/time/struct.Fixed.html). This leaves us with a last problem, however. If our physics simulation may advance zero or multiple times per frame, there may be frames in which the player's position did not need to be updated at all, and some where it is updated by a large amount that resulted from running the physics simulation multiple times. This is physically correct, but visually jarring. Imagine a player moving in a straight line, but depending on the frame rate, they may sometimes advance by a large amount and sometimes not at all. Visually, we want the player to move smoothly. This is why we need to separate the player's position in the physics simulation from the player's position in the visual representation. The visual representation can then be interpolated smoothly based on the last and current actual player position in the physics simulation. This is a tradeoff: every visual frame is now slightly lagging behind the actual physical frame, but in return, the player's movement will appear smooth. There are other ways to compute the visual representation of the player, such as extrapolation. See the [documentation of the lightyear crate](https://cbournhonesque.github.io/lightyear/book/concepts/advanced_replication/visual_interpolation.html) for a nice overview of the different methods and their tradeoffs. ## Implementation - The player's velocity is stored in a `Velocity` component. This is the speed in units per second. - The player's current position in the physics simulation is stored in a `PhysicalTranslation` component. - The player's previous position in the physics simulation is stored in a `PreviousPhysicalTranslation` component. - The player's visual representation is stored in Bevy's regular `Transform` component. - Every frame, we go through the following steps: - Advance the physics simulation by one fixed timestep in the `advance_physics` system. This is run in the `FixedUpdate` schedule, which runs before the `Update` schedule. - Update the player's visual representation in the `update_displayed_transform` system. This interpolates between the player's previous and current position in the physics simulation. - Update the player's velocity based on the player's input in the `handle_input` system. ## Relevant Issues Related to #1259. I'm also fairly sure I've seen an issue somewhere made by @alice-i-cecile about showing how to move a character correctly in a fixed timestep, but I cannot find it.
2024-07-09 14:23:10 +00:00
#[derive(Debug, Component, Clone, Copy, PartialEq, Default, Deref, DerefMut)]
struct PreviousPhysicalTranslation(Vec3);
/// Spawn the player sprite and a 2D camera.
fn spawn_player(mut commands: Commands, asset_server: Res<AssetServer>) {
Migrate cameras to required components (#15641) # Objective Yet another PR for migrating stuff to required components. This time, cameras! ## Solution As per the [selected proposal](https://hackmd.io/tsYID4CGRiWxzsgawzxG_g#Combined-Proposal-1-Selected), deprecate `Camera2dBundle` and `Camera3dBundle` in favor of `Camera2d` and `Camera3d`. Adding a `Camera` without `Camera2d` or `Camera3d` now logs a warning, as suggested by Cart [on Discord](https://discord.com/channels/691052431525675048/1264881140007702558/1291506402832945273). I would personally like cameras to work a bit differently and be split into a few more components, to avoid some footguns and confusing semantics, but that is more controversial, and shouldn't block this core migration. ## Testing I ran a few 2D and 3D examples, and tried cameras with and without render graphs. --- ## Migration Guide `Camera2dBundle` and `Camera3dBundle` have been deprecated in favor of `Camera2d` and `Camera3d`. Inserting them will now also insert the other components required by them automatically.
2024-10-05 01:59:52 +00:00
commands.spawn(Camera2d);
Add an example for doing movement in fixed timesteps (#14223) _copy-pasted from my doc comment in the code_ # Objective This example shows how to properly handle player input, advance a physics simulation in a fixed timestep, and display the results. The classic source for how and why this is done is Glenn Fiedler's article [Fix Your Timestep!](https://gafferongames.com/post/fix_your_timestep/). ## Motivation The naive way of moving a player is to just update their position like so: ```rust transform.translation += velocity; ``` The issue here is that the player's movement speed will be tied to the frame rate. Faster machines will move the player faster, and slower machines will move the player slower. In fact, you can observe this today when running some old games that did it this way on modern hardware! The player will move at a breakneck pace. The more sophisticated way is to update the player's position based on the time that has passed: ```rust transform.translation += velocity * time.delta_seconds(); ``` This way, velocity represents a speed in units per second, and the player will move at the same speed regardless of the frame rate. However, this can still be problematic if the frame rate is very low or very high. If the frame rate is very low, the player will move in large jumps. This may lead to a player moving in such large jumps that they pass through walls or other obstacles. In general, you cannot expect a physics simulation to behave nicely with *any* delta time. Ideally, we want to have some stability in what kinds of delta times we feed into our physics simulation. The solution is using a fixed timestep. This means that we advance the physics simulation by a fixed amount at a time. If the real time that passed between two frames is less than the fixed timestep, we simply don't advance the physics simulation at all. If it is more, we advance the physics simulation multiple times until we catch up. You can read more about how Bevy implements this in the documentation for [`bevy::time::Fixed`](https://docs.rs/bevy/latest/bevy/time/struct.Fixed.html). This leaves us with a last problem, however. If our physics simulation may advance zero or multiple times per frame, there may be frames in which the player's position did not need to be updated at all, and some where it is updated by a large amount that resulted from running the physics simulation multiple times. This is physically correct, but visually jarring. Imagine a player moving in a straight line, but depending on the frame rate, they may sometimes advance by a large amount and sometimes not at all. Visually, we want the player to move smoothly. This is why we need to separate the player's position in the physics simulation from the player's position in the visual representation. The visual representation can then be interpolated smoothly based on the last and current actual player position in the physics simulation. This is a tradeoff: every visual frame is now slightly lagging behind the actual physical frame, but in return, the player's movement will appear smooth. There are other ways to compute the visual representation of the player, such as extrapolation. See the [documentation of the lightyear crate](https://cbournhonesque.github.io/lightyear/book/concepts/advanced_replication/visual_interpolation.html) for a nice overview of the different methods and their tradeoffs. ## Implementation - The player's velocity is stored in a `Velocity` component. This is the speed in units per second. - The player's current position in the physics simulation is stored in a `PhysicalTranslation` component. - The player's previous position in the physics simulation is stored in a `PreviousPhysicalTranslation` component. - The player's visual representation is stored in Bevy's regular `Transform` component. - Every frame, we go through the following steps: - Advance the physics simulation by one fixed timestep in the `advance_physics` system. This is run in the `FixedUpdate` schedule, which runs before the `Update` schedule. - Update the player's visual representation in the `update_displayed_transform` system. This interpolates between the player's previous and current position in the physics simulation. - Update the player's velocity based on the player's input in the `handle_input` system. ## Relevant Issues Related to #1259. I'm also fairly sure I've seen an issue somewhere made by @alice-i-cecile about showing how to move a character correctly in a fixed timestep, but I cannot find it.
2024-07-09 14:23:10 +00:00
commands.spawn((
Name::new("Player"),
SpriteBundle {
texture: asset_server.load("branding/icon.png"),
transform: Transform::from_scale(Vec3::splat(0.3)),
..default()
},
Allow ordering variable timesteps around fixed timesteps (#14881) # Objective - Fixes #14873, see that issue for a whole lot of context ## Solution - Add a blessed system set for this stuff. See [this Discord discussion](https://discord.com/channels/691052431525675048/749335865876021248/1276262931327094908). Note that the gizmo systems, [LWIM](https://github.com/Leafwing-Studios/leafwing-input-manager/pull/522/files#diff-9b59ee4899ad0a5d008889ea89a124a7291316532e42f9f3d6ae842b906fb095R154) and now a new plugin I'm working on are all already ordering against `run_fixed_main_schedule`, so having a dedicated system set should be more robust and hopefully also more discoverable. --- ## ~~Showcase~~ ~~I can add a little video of a smooth camera later if this gets merged :)~~ Apparently a release note is not needed, so I'll leave it out. See the changes in the fixed timestep example for usage showcase and the video in #14873 for a more or less accurate video of the effect (it does not use the same solution though, so it is not quite the same) ## Migration Guide [run_fixed_main_schedule](https://docs.rs/bevy/latest/bevy/time/fn.run_fixed_main_schedule.html) is no longer public. If you used to order against it, use the new dedicated `RunFixedMainLoopSystem` system set instead. You can replace your usage of `run_fixed_main_schedule` one for one by `RunFixedMainLoopSystem::FixedMainLoop`, but it is now more idiomatic to place your systems in either `RunFixedMainLoopSystem::BeforeFixedMainLoop` or `RunFixedMainLoopSystem::AfterFixedMainLoop` Old: ```rust app.add_systems( RunFixedMainLoop, some_system.before(run_fixed_main_schedule) ); ``` New: ```rust app.add_systems( RunFixedMainLoop, some_system.in_set(RunFixedMainLoopSystem::BeforeFixedMainLoop) ); ``` --------- Co-authored-by: Tau Gärtli <git@tau.garden>
2024-08-23 16:19:42 +00:00
AccumulatedInput::default(),
Add an example for doing movement in fixed timesteps (#14223) _copy-pasted from my doc comment in the code_ # Objective This example shows how to properly handle player input, advance a physics simulation in a fixed timestep, and display the results. The classic source for how and why this is done is Glenn Fiedler's article [Fix Your Timestep!](https://gafferongames.com/post/fix_your_timestep/). ## Motivation The naive way of moving a player is to just update their position like so: ```rust transform.translation += velocity; ``` The issue here is that the player's movement speed will be tied to the frame rate. Faster machines will move the player faster, and slower machines will move the player slower. In fact, you can observe this today when running some old games that did it this way on modern hardware! The player will move at a breakneck pace. The more sophisticated way is to update the player's position based on the time that has passed: ```rust transform.translation += velocity * time.delta_seconds(); ``` This way, velocity represents a speed in units per second, and the player will move at the same speed regardless of the frame rate. However, this can still be problematic if the frame rate is very low or very high. If the frame rate is very low, the player will move in large jumps. This may lead to a player moving in such large jumps that they pass through walls or other obstacles. In general, you cannot expect a physics simulation to behave nicely with *any* delta time. Ideally, we want to have some stability in what kinds of delta times we feed into our physics simulation. The solution is using a fixed timestep. This means that we advance the physics simulation by a fixed amount at a time. If the real time that passed between two frames is less than the fixed timestep, we simply don't advance the physics simulation at all. If it is more, we advance the physics simulation multiple times until we catch up. You can read more about how Bevy implements this in the documentation for [`bevy::time::Fixed`](https://docs.rs/bevy/latest/bevy/time/struct.Fixed.html). This leaves us with a last problem, however. If our physics simulation may advance zero or multiple times per frame, there may be frames in which the player's position did not need to be updated at all, and some where it is updated by a large amount that resulted from running the physics simulation multiple times. This is physically correct, but visually jarring. Imagine a player moving in a straight line, but depending on the frame rate, they may sometimes advance by a large amount and sometimes not at all. Visually, we want the player to move smoothly. This is why we need to separate the player's position in the physics simulation from the player's position in the visual representation. The visual representation can then be interpolated smoothly based on the last and current actual player position in the physics simulation. This is a tradeoff: every visual frame is now slightly lagging behind the actual physical frame, but in return, the player's movement will appear smooth. There are other ways to compute the visual representation of the player, such as extrapolation. See the [documentation of the lightyear crate](https://cbournhonesque.github.io/lightyear/book/concepts/advanced_replication/visual_interpolation.html) for a nice overview of the different methods and their tradeoffs. ## Implementation - The player's velocity is stored in a `Velocity` component. This is the speed in units per second. - The player's current position in the physics simulation is stored in a `PhysicalTranslation` component. - The player's previous position in the physics simulation is stored in a `PreviousPhysicalTranslation` component. - The player's visual representation is stored in Bevy's regular `Transform` component. - Every frame, we go through the following steps: - Advance the physics simulation by one fixed timestep in the `advance_physics` system. This is run in the `FixedUpdate` schedule, which runs before the `Update` schedule. - Update the player's visual representation in the `update_displayed_transform` system. This interpolates between the player's previous and current position in the physics simulation. - Update the player's velocity based on the player's input in the `handle_input` system. ## Relevant Issues Related to #1259. I'm also fairly sure I've seen an issue somewhere made by @alice-i-cecile about showing how to move a character correctly in a fixed timestep, but I cannot find it.
2024-07-09 14:23:10 +00:00
Velocity::default(),
PhysicalTranslation::default(),
PreviousPhysicalTranslation::default(),
));
}
/// Spawn a bit of UI text to explain how to move the player.
fn spawn_text(mut commands: Commands) {
commands
.spawn(NodeBundle {
style: Style {
position_type: PositionType::Absolute,
bottom: Val::Px(12.0),
left: Val::Px(12.0),
..default()
},
..default()
})
.with_children(|parent| {
parent.spawn(TextBundle::from_section(
"Move the player with WASD",
TextStyle {
font_size: 25.0,
..default()
},
));
});
}
Allow ordering variable timesteps around fixed timesteps (#14881) # Objective - Fixes #14873, see that issue for a whole lot of context ## Solution - Add a blessed system set for this stuff. See [this Discord discussion](https://discord.com/channels/691052431525675048/749335865876021248/1276262931327094908). Note that the gizmo systems, [LWIM](https://github.com/Leafwing-Studios/leafwing-input-manager/pull/522/files#diff-9b59ee4899ad0a5d008889ea89a124a7291316532e42f9f3d6ae842b906fb095R154) and now a new plugin I'm working on are all already ordering against `run_fixed_main_schedule`, so having a dedicated system set should be more robust and hopefully also more discoverable. --- ## ~~Showcase~~ ~~I can add a little video of a smooth camera later if this gets merged :)~~ Apparently a release note is not needed, so I'll leave it out. See the changes in the fixed timestep example for usage showcase and the video in #14873 for a more or less accurate video of the effect (it does not use the same solution though, so it is not quite the same) ## Migration Guide [run_fixed_main_schedule](https://docs.rs/bevy/latest/bevy/time/fn.run_fixed_main_schedule.html) is no longer public. If you used to order against it, use the new dedicated `RunFixedMainLoopSystem` system set instead. You can replace your usage of `run_fixed_main_schedule` one for one by `RunFixedMainLoopSystem::FixedMainLoop`, but it is now more idiomatic to place your systems in either `RunFixedMainLoopSystem::BeforeFixedMainLoop` or `RunFixedMainLoopSystem::AfterFixedMainLoop` Old: ```rust app.add_systems( RunFixedMainLoop, some_system.before(run_fixed_main_schedule) ); ``` New: ```rust app.add_systems( RunFixedMainLoop, some_system.in_set(RunFixedMainLoopSystem::BeforeFixedMainLoop) ); ``` --------- Co-authored-by: Tau Gärtli <git@tau.garden>
2024-08-23 16:19:42 +00:00
/// Handle keyboard input and accumulate it in the `AccumulatedInput` component.
Simpler lint fixes: makes `ci lints` work but disables a lint for now (#15376) Takes the first two commits from #15375 and adds suggestions from this comment: https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/pull/15375#issuecomment-2366968300 See #15375 for more reasoning/motivation. ## Rebasing (rerunning) ```rust git switch simpler-lint-fixes git reset --hard main cargo fmt --all -- --unstable-features --config normalize_comments=true,imports_granularity=Crate cargo fmt --all git add --update git commit --message "rustfmt" cargo clippy --workspace --all-targets --all-features --fix cargo fmt --all -- --unstable-features --config normalize_comments=true,imports_granularity=Crate cargo fmt --all git add --update git commit --message "clippy" git cherry-pick e6c0b94f6795222310fb812fa5c4512661fc7887 ```
2024-09-24 11:42:59 +00:00
///
Allow ordering variable timesteps around fixed timesteps (#14881) # Objective - Fixes #14873, see that issue for a whole lot of context ## Solution - Add a blessed system set for this stuff. See [this Discord discussion](https://discord.com/channels/691052431525675048/749335865876021248/1276262931327094908). Note that the gizmo systems, [LWIM](https://github.com/Leafwing-Studios/leafwing-input-manager/pull/522/files#diff-9b59ee4899ad0a5d008889ea89a124a7291316532e42f9f3d6ae842b906fb095R154) and now a new plugin I'm working on are all already ordering against `run_fixed_main_schedule`, so having a dedicated system set should be more robust and hopefully also more discoverable. --- ## ~~Showcase~~ ~~I can add a little video of a smooth camera later if this gets merged :)~~ Apparently a release note is not needed, so I'll leave it out. See the changes in the fixed timestep example for usage showcase and the video in #14873 for a more or less accurate video of the effect (it does not use the same solution though, so it is not quite the same) ## Migration Guide [run_fixed_main_schedule](https://docs.rs/bevy/latest/bevy/time/fn.run_fixed_main_schedule.html) is no longer public. If you used to order against it, use the new dedicated `RunFixedMainLoopSystem` system set instead. You can replace your usage of `run_fixed_main_schedule` one for one by `RunFixedMainLoopSystem::FixedMainLoop`, but it is now more idiomatic to place your systems in either `RunFixedMainLoopSystem::BeforeFixedMainLoop` or `RunFixedMainLoopSystem::AfterFixedMainLoop` Old: ```rust app.add_systems( RunFixedMainLoop, some_system.before(run_fixed_main_schedule) ); ``` New: ```rust app.add_systems( RunFixedMainLoop, some_system.in_set(RunFixedMainLoopSystem::BeforeFixedMainLoop) ); ``` --------- Co-authored-by: Tau Gärtli <git@tau.garden>
2024-08-23 16:19:42 +00:00
/// There are many strategies for how to handle all the input that happened since the last fixed timestep.
/// This is a very simple one: we just accumulate the input and average it out by normalizing it.
fn handle_input(
keyboard_input: Res<ButtonInput<KeyCode>>,
mut query: Query<(&mut AccumulatedInput, &mut Velocity)>,
) {
Add an example for doing movement in fixed timesteps (#14223) _copy-pasted from my doc comment in the code_ # Objective This example shows how to properly handle player input, advance a physics simulation in a fixed timestep, and display the results. The classic source for how and why this is done is Glenn Fiedler's article [Fix Your Timestep!](https://gafferongames.com/post/fix_your_timestep/). ## Motivation The naive way of moving a player is to just update their position like so: ```rust transform.translation += velocity; ``` The issue here is that the player's movement speed will be tied to the frame rate. Faster machines will move the player faster, and slower machines will move the player slower. In fact, you can observe this today when running some old games that did it this way on modern hardware! The player will move at a breakneck pace. The more sophisticated way is to update the player's position based on the time that has passed: ```rust transform.translation += velocity * time.delta_seconds(); ``` This way, velocity represents a speed in units per second, and the player will move at the same speed regardless of the frame rate. However, this can still be problematic if the frame rate is very low or very high. If the frame rate is very low, the player will move in large jumps. This may lead to a player moving in such large jumps that they pass through walls or other obstacles. In general, you cannot expect a physics simulation to behave nicely with *any* delta time. Ideally, we want to have some stability in what kinds of delta times we feed into our physics simulation. The solution is using a fixed timestep. This means that we advance the physics simulation by a fixed amount at a time. If the real time that passed between two frames is less than the fixed timestep, we simply don't advance the physics simulation at all. If it is more, we advance the physics simulation multiple times until we catch up. You can read more about how Bevy implements this in the documentation for [`bevy::time::Fixed`](https://docs.rs/bevy/latest/bevy/time/struct.Fixed.html). This leaves us with a last problem, however. If our physics simulation may advance zero or multiple times per frame, there may be frames in which the player's position did not need to be updated at all, and some where it is updated by a large amount that resulted from running the physics simulation multiple times. This is physically correct, but visually jarring. Imagine a player moving in a straight line, but depending on the frame rate, they may sometimes advance by a large amount and sometimes not at all. Visually, we want the player to move smoothly. This is why we need to separate the player's position in the physics simulation from the player's position in the visual representation. The visual representation can then be interpolated smoothly based on the last and current actual player position in the physics simulation. This is a tradeoff: every visual frame is now slightly lagging behind the actual physical frame, but in return, the player's movement will appear smooth. There are other ways to compute the visual representation of the player, such as extrapolation. See the [documentation of the lightyear crate](https://cbournhonesque.github.io/lightyear/book/concepts/advanced_replication/visual_interpolation.html) for a nice overview of the different methods and their tradeoffs. ## Implementation - The player's velocity is stored in a `Velocity` component. This is the speed in units per second. - The player's current position in the physics simulation is stored in a `PhysicalTranslation` component. - The player's previous position in the physics simulation is stored in a `PreviousPhysicalTranslation` component. - The player's visual representation is stored in Bevy's regular `Transform` component. - Every frame, we go through the following steps: - Advance the physics simulation by one fixed timestep in the `advance_physics` system. This is run in the `FixedUpdate` schedule, which runs before the `Update` schedule. - Update the player's visual representation in the `update_displayed_transform` system. This interpolates between the player's previous and current position in the physics simulation. - Update the player's velocity based on the player's input in the `handle_input` system. ## Relevant Issues Related to #1259. I'm also fairly sure I've seen an issue somewhere made by @alice-i-cecile about showing how to move a character correctly in a fixed timestep, but I cannot find it.
2024-07-09 14:23:10 +00:00
/// Since Bevy's default 2D camera setup is scaled such that
/// one unit is one pixel, you can think of this as
/// "How many pixels per second should the player move?"
const SPEED: f32 = 210.0;
Allow ordering variable timesteps around fixed timesteps (#14881) # Objective - Fixes #14873, see that issue for a whole lot of context ## Solution - Add a blessed system set for this stuff. See [this Discord discussion](https://discord.com/channels/691052431525675048/749335865876021248/1276262931327094908). Note that the gizmo systems, [LWIM](https://github.com/Leafwing-Studios/leafwing-input-manager/pull/522/files#diff-9b59ee4899ad0a5d008889ea89a124a7291316532e42f9f3d6ae842b906fb095R154) and now a new plugin I'm working on are all already ordering against `run_fixed_main_schedule`, so having a dedicated system set should be more robust and hopefully also more discoverable. --- ## ~~Showcase~~ ~~I can add a little video of a smooth camera later if this gets merged :)~~ Apparently a release note is not needed, so I'll leave it out. See the changes in the fixed timestep example for usage showcase and the video in #14873 for a more or less accurate video of the effect (it does not use the same solution though, so it is not quite the same) ## Migration Guide [run_fixed_main_schedule](https://docs.rs/bevy/latest/bevy/time/fn.run_fixed_main_schedule.html) is no longer public. If you used to order against it, use the new dedicated `RunFixedMainLoopSystem` system set instead. You can replace your usage of `run_fixed_main_schedule` one for one by `RunFixedMainLoopSystem::FixedMainLoop`, but it is now more idiomatic to place your systems in either `RunFixedMainLoopSystem::BeforeFixedMainLoop` or `RunFixedMainLoopSystem::AfterFixedMainLoop` Old: ```rust app.add_systems( RunFixedMainLoop, some_system.before(run_fixed_main_schedule) ); ``` New: ```rust app.add_systems( RunFixedMainLoop, some_system.in_set(RunFixedMainLoopSystem::BeforeFixedMainLoop) ); ``` --------- Co-authored-by: Tau Gärtli <git@tau.garden>
2024-08-23 16:19:42 +00:00
for (mut input, mut velocity) in query.iter_mut() {
Add an example for doing movement in fixed timesteps (#14223) _copy-pasted from my doc comment in the code_ # Objective This example shows how to properly handle player input, advance a physics simulation in a fixed timestep, and display the results. The classic source for how and why this is done is Glenn Fiedler's article [Fix Your Timestep!](https://gafferongames.com/post/fix_your_timestep/). ## Motivation The naive way of moving a player is to just update their position like so: ```rust transform.translation += velocity; ``` The issue here is that the player's movement speed will be tied to the frame rate. Faster machines will move the player faster, and slower machines will move the player slower. In fact, you can observe this today when running some old games that did it this way on modern hardware! The player will move at a breakneck pace. The more sophisticated way is to update the player's position based on the time that has passed: ```rust transform.translation += velocity * time.delta_seconds(); ``` This way, velocity represents a speed in units per second, and the player will move at the same speed regardless of the frame rate. However, this can still be problematic if the frame rate is very low or very high. If the frame rate is very low, the player will move in large jumps. This may lead to a player moving in such large jumps that they pass through walls or other obstacles. In general, you cannot expect a physics simulation to behave nicely with *any* delta time. Ideally, we want to have some stability in what kinds of delta times we feed into our physics simulation. The solution is using a fixed timestep. This means that we advance the physics simulation by a fixed amount at a time. If the real time that passed between two frames is less than the fixed timestep, we simply don't advance the physics simulation at all. If it is more, we advance the physics simulation multiple times until we catch up. You can read more about how Bevy implements this in the documentation for [`bevy::time::Fixed`](https://docs.rs/bevy/latest/bevy/time/struct.Fixed.html). This leaves us with a last problem, however. If our physics simulation may advance zero or multiple times per frame, there may be frames in which the player's position did not need to be updated at all, and some where it is updated by a large amount that resulted from running the physics simulation multiple times. This is physically correct, but visually jarring. Imagine a player moving in a straight line, but depending on the frame rate, they may sometimes advance by a large amount and sometimes not at all. Visually, we want the player to move smoothly. This is why we need to separate the player's position in the physics simulation from the player's position in the visual representation. The visual representation can then be interpolated smoothly based on the last and current actual player position in the physics simulation. This is a tradeoff: every visual frame is now slightly lagging behind the actual physical frame, but in return, the player's movement will appear smooth. There are other ways to compute the visual representation of the player, such as extrapolation. See the [documentation of the lightyear crate](https://cbournhonesque.github.io/lightyear/book/concepts/advanced_replication/visual_interpolation.html) for a nice overview of the different methods and their tradeoffs. ## Implementation - The player's velocity is stored in a `Velocity` component. This is the speed in units per second. - The player's current position in the physics simulation is stored in a `PhysicalTranslation` component. - The player's previous position in the physics simulation is stored in a `PreviousPhysicalTranslation` component. - The player's visual representation is stored in Bevy's regular `Transform` component. - Every frame, we go through the following steps: - Advance the physics simulation by one fixed timestep in the `advance_physics` system. This is run in the `FixedUpdate` schedule, which runs before the `Update` schedule. - Update the player's visual representation in the `update_displayed_transform` system. This interpolates between the player's previous and current position in the physics simulation. - Update the player's velocity based on the player's input in the `handle_input` system. ## Relevant Issues Related to #1259. I'm also fairly sure I've seen an issue somewhere made by @alice-i-cecile about showing how to move a character correctly in a fixed timestep, but I cannot find it.
2024-07-09 14:23:10 +00:00
if keyboard_input.pressed(KeyCode::KeyW) {
Allow ordering variable timesteps around fixed timesteps (#14881) # Objective - Fixes #14873, see that issue for a whole lot of context ## Solution - Add a blessed system set for this stuff. See [this Discord discussion](https://discord.com/channels/691052431525675048/749335865876021248/1276262931327094908). Note that the gizmo systems, [LWIM](https://github.com/Leafwing-Studios/leafwing-input-manager/pull/522/files#diff-9b59ee4899ad0a5d008889ea89a124a7291316532e42f9f3d6ae842b906fb095R154) and now a new plugin I'm working on are all already ordering against `run_fixed_main_schedule`, so having a dedicated system set should be more robust and hopefully also more discoverable. --- ## ~~Showcase~~ ~~I can add a little video of a smooth camera later if this gets merged :)~~ Apparently a release note is not needed, so I'll leave it out. See the changes in the fixed timestep example for usage showcase and the video in #14873 for a more or less accurate video of the effect (it does not use the same solution though, so it is not quite the same) ## Migration Guide [run_fixed_main_schedule](https://docs.rs/bevy/latest/bevy/time/fn.run_fixed_main_schedule.html) is no longer public. If you used to order against it, use the new dedicated `RunFixedMainLoopSystem` system set instead. You can replace your usage of `run_fixed_main_schedule` one for one by `RunFixedMainLoopSystem::FixedMainLoop`, but it is now more idiomatic to place your systems in either `RunFixedMainLoopSystem::BeforeFixedMainLoop` or `RunFixedMainLoopSystem::AfterFixedMainLoop` Old: ```rust app.add_systems( RunFixedMainLoop, some_system.before(run_fixed_main_schedule) ); ``` New: ```rust app.add_systems( RunFixedMainLoop, some_system.in_set(RunFixedMainLoopSystem::BeforeFixedMainLoop) ); ``` --------- Co-authored-by: Tau Gärtli <git@tau.garden>
2024-08-23 16:19:42 +00:00
input.y += 1.0;
Add an example for doing movement in fixed timesteps (#14223) _copy-pasted from my doc comment in the code_ # Objective This example shows how to properly handle player input, advance a physics simulation in a fixed timestep, and display the results. The classic source for how and why this is done is Glenn Fiedler's article [Fix Your Timestep!](https://gafferongames.com/post/fix_your_timestep/). ## Motivation The naive way of moving a player is to just update their position like so: ```rust transform.translation += velocity; ``` The issue here is that the player's movement speed will be tied to the frame rate. Faster machines will move the player faster, and slower machines will move the player slower. In fact, you can observe this today when running some old games that did it this way on modern hardware! The player will move at a breakneck pace. The more sophisticated way is to update the player's position based on the time that has passed: ```rust transform.translation += velocity * time.delta_seconds(); ``` This way, velocity represents a speed in units per second, and the player will move at the same speed regardless of the frame rate. However, this can still be problematic if the frame rate is very low or very high. If the frame rate is very low, the player will move in large jumps. This may lead to a player moving in such large jumps that they pass through walls or other obstacles. In general, you cannot expect a physics simulation to behave nicely with *any* delta time. Ideally, we want to have some stability in what kinds of delta times we feed into our physics simulation. The solution is using a fixed timestep. This means that we advance the physics simulation by a fixed amount at a time. If the real time that passed between two frames is less than the fixed timestep, we simply don't advance the physics simulation at all. If it is more, we advance the physics simulation multiple times until we catch up. You can read more about how Bevy implements this in the documentation for [`bevy::time::Fixed`](https://docs.rs/bevy/latest/bevy/time/struct.Fixed.html). This leaves us with a last problem, however. If our physics simulation may advance zero or multiple times per frame, there may be frames in which the player's position did not need to be updated at all, and some where it is updated by a large amount that resulted from running the physics simulation multiple times. This is physically correct, but visually jarring. Imagine a player moving in a straight line, but depending on the frame rate, they may sometimes advance by a large amount and sometimes not at all. Visually, we want the player to move smoothly. This is why we need to separate the player's position in the physics simulation from the player's position in the visual representation. The visual representation can then be interpolated smoothly based on the last and current actual player position in the physics simulation. This is a tradeoff: every visual frame is now slightly lagging behind the actual physical frame, but in return, the player's movement will appear smooth. There are other ways to compute the visual representation of the player, such as extrapolation. See the [documentation of the lightyear crate](https://cbournhonesque.github.io/lightyear/book/concepts/advanced_replication/visual_interpolation.html) for a nice overview of the different methods and their tradeoffs. ## Implementation - The player's velocity is stored in a `Velocity` component. This is the speed in units per second. - The player's current position in the physics simulation is stored in a `PhysicalTranslation` component. - The player's previous position in the physics simulation is stored in a `PreviousPhysicalTranslation` component. - The player's visual representation is stored in Bevy's regular `Transform` component. - Every frame, we go through the following steps: - Advance the physics simulation by one fixed timestep in the `advance_physics` system. This is run in the `FixedUpdate` schedule, which runs before the `Update` schedule. - Update the player's visual representation in the `update_displayed_transform` system. This interpolates between the player's previous and current position in the physics simulation. - Update the player's velocity based on the player's input in the `handle_input` system. ## Relevant Issues Related to #1259. I'm also fairly sure I've seen an issue somewhere made by @alice-i-cecile about showing how to move a character correctly in a fixed timestep, but I cannot find it.
2024-07-09 14:23:10 +00:00
}
if keyboard_input.pressed(KeyCode::KeyS) {
Allow ordering variable timesteps around fixed timesteps (#14881) # Objective - Fixes #14873, see that issue for a whole lot of context ## Solution - Add a blessed system set for this stuff. See [this Discord discussion](https://discord.com/channels/691052431525675048/749335865876021248/1276262931327094908). Note that the gizmo systems, [LWIM](https://github.com/Leafwing-Studios/leafwing-input-manager/pull/522/files#diff-9b59ee4899ad0a5d008889ea89a124a7291316532e42f9f3d6ae842b906fb095R154) and now a new plugin I'm working on are all already ordering against `run_fixed_main_schedule`, so having a dedicated system set should be more robust and hopefully also more discoverable. --- ## ~~Showcase~~ ~~I can add a little video of a smooth camera later if this gets merged :)~~ Apparently a release note is not needed, so I'll leave it out. See the changes in the fixed timestep example for usage showcase and the video in #14873 for a more or less accurate video of the effect (it does not use the same solution though, so it is not quite the same) ## Migration Guide [run_fixed_main_schedule](https://docs.rs/bevy/latest/bevy/time/fn.run_fixed_main_schedule.html) is no longer public. If you used to order against it, use the new dedicated `RunFixedMainLoopSystem` system set instead. You can replace your usage of `run_fixed_main_schedule` one for one by `RunFixedMainLoopSystem::FixedMainLoop`, but it is now more idiomatic to place your systems in either `RunFixedMainLoopSystem::BeforeFixedMainLoop` or `RunFixedMainLoopSystem::AfterFixedMainLoop` Old: ```rust app.add_systems( RunFixedMainLoop, some_system.before(run_fixed_main_schedule) ); ``` New: ```rust app.add_systems( RunFixedMainLoop, some_system.in_set(RunFixedMainLoopSystem::BeforeFixedMainLoop) ); ``` --------- Co-authored-by: Tau Gärtli <git@tau.garden>
2024-08-23 16:19:42 +00:00
input.y -= 1.0;
Add an example for doing movement in fixed timesteps (#14223) _copy-pasted from my doc comment in the code_ # Objective This example shows how to properly handle player input, advance a physics simulation in a fixed timestep, and display the results. The classic source for how and why this is done is Glenn Fiedler's article [Fix Your Timestep!](https://gafferongames.com/post/fix_your_timestep/). ## Motivation The naive way of moving a player is to just update their position like so: ```rust transform.translation += velocity; ``` The issue here is that the player's movement speed will be tied to the frame rate. Faster machines will move the player faster, and slower machines will move the player slower. In fact, you can observe this today when running some old games that did it this way on modern hardware! The player will move at a breakneck pace. The more sophisticated way is to update the player's position based on the time that has passed: ```rust transform.translation += velocity * time.delta_seconds(); ``` This way, velocity represents a speed in units per second, and the player will move at the same speed regardless of the frame rate. However, this can still be problematic if the frame rate is very low or very high. If the frame rate is very low, the player will move in large jumps. This may lead to a player moving in such large jumps that they pass through walls or other obstacles. In general, you cannot expect a physics simulation to behave nicely with *any* delta time. Ideally, we want to have some stability in what kinds of delta times we feed into our physics simulation. The solution is using a fixed timestep. This means that we advance the physics simulation by a fixed amount at a time. If the real time that passed between two frames is less than the fixed timestep, we simply don't advance the physics simulation at all. If it is more, we advance the physics simulation multiple times until we catch up. You can read more about how Bevy implements this in the documentation for [`bevy::time::Fixed`](https://docs.rs/bevy/latest/bevy/time/struct.Fixed.html). This leaves us with a last problem, however. If our physics simulation may advance zero or multiple times per frame, there may be frames in which the player's position did not need to be updated at all, and some where it is updated by a large amount that resulted from running the physics simulation multiple times. This is physically correct, but visually jarring. Imagine a player moving in a straight line, but depending on the frame rate, they may sometimes advance by a large amount and sometimes not at all. Visually, we want the player to move smoothly. This is why we need to separate the player's position in the physics simulation from the player's position in the visual representation. The visual representation can then be interpolated smoothly based on the last and current actual player position in the physics simulation. This is a tradeoff: every visual frame is now slightly lagging behind the actual physical frame, but in return, the player's movement will appear smooth. There are other ways to compute the visual representation of the player, such as extrapolation. See the [documentation of the lightyear crate](https://cbournhonesque.github.io/lightyear/book/concepts/advanced_replication/visual_interpolation.html) for a nice overview of the different methods and their tradeoffs. ## Implementation - The player's velocity is stored in a `Velocity` component. This is the speed in units per second. - The player's current position in the physics simulation is stored in a `PhysicalTranslation` component. - The player's previous position in the physics simulation is stored in a `PreviousPhysicalTranslation` component. - The player's visual representation is stored in Bevy's regular `Transform` component. - Every frame, we go through the following steps: - Advance the physics simulation by one fixed timestep in the `advance_physics` system. This is run in the `FixedUpdate` schedule, which runs before the `Update` schedule. - Update the player's visual representation in the `update_displayed_transform` system. This interpolates between the player's previous and current position in the physics simulation. - Update the player's velocity based on the player's input in the `handle_input` system. ## Relevant Issues Related to #1259. I'm also fairly sure I've seen an issue somewhere made by @alice-i-cecile about showing how to move a character correctly in a fixed timestep, but I cannot find it.
2024-07-09 14:23:10 +00:00
}
if keyboard_input.pressed(KeyCode::KeyA) {
Allow ordering variable timesteps around fixed timesteps (#14881) # Objective - Fixes #14873, see that issue for a whole lot of context ## Solution - Add a blessed system set for this stuff. See [this Discord discussion](https://discord.com/channels/691052431525675048/749335865876021248/1276262931327094908). Note that the gizmo systems, [LWIM](https://github.com/Leafwing-Studios/leafwing-input-manager/pull/522/files#diff-9b59ee4899ad0a5d008889ea89a124a7291316532e42f9f3d6ae842b906fb095R154) and now a new plugin I'm working on are all already ordering against `run_fixed_main_schedule`, so having a dedicated system set should be more robust and hopefully also more discoverable. --- ## ~~Showcase~~ ~~I can add a little video of a smooth camera later if this gets merged :)~~ Apparently a release note is not needed, so I'll leave it out. See the changes in the fixed timestep example for usage showcase and the video in #14873 for a more or less accurate video of the effect (it does not use the same solution though, so it is not quite the same) ## Migration Guide [run_fixed_main_schedule](https://docs.rs/bevy/latest/bevy/time/fn.run_fixed_main_schedule.html) is no longer public. If you used to order against it, use the new dedicated `RunFixedMainLoopSystem` system set instead. You can replace your usage of `run_fixed_main_schedule` one for one by `RunFixedMainLoopSystem::FixedMainLoop`, but it is now more idiomatic to place your systems in either `RunFixedMainLoopSystem::BeforeFixedMainLoop` or `RunFixedMainLoopSystem::AfterFixedMainLoop` Old: ```rust app.add_systems( RunFixedMainLoop, some_system.before(run_fixed_main_schedule) ); ``` New: ```rust app.add_systems( RunFixedMainLoop, some_system.in_set(RunFixedMainLoopSystem::BeforeFixedMainLoop) ); ``` --------- Co-authored-by: Tau Gärtli <git@tau.garden>
2024-08-23 16:19:42 +00:00
input.x -= 1.0;
Add an example for doing movement in fixed timesteps (#14223) _copy-pasted from my doc comment in the code_ # Objective This example shows how to properly handle player input, advance a physics simulation in a fixed timestep, and display the results. The classic source for how and why this is done is Glenn Fiedler's article [Fix Your Timestep!](https://gafferongames.com/post/fix_your_timestep/). ## Motivation The naive way of moving a player is to just update their position like so: ```rust transform.translation += velocity; ``` The issue here is that the player's movement speed will be tied to the frame rate. Faster machines will move the player faster, and slower machines will move the player slower. In fact, you can observe this today when running some old games that did it this way on modern hardware! The player will move at a breakneck pace. The more sophisticated way is to update the player's position based on the time that has passed: ```rust transform.translation += velocity * time.delta_seconds(); ``` This way, velocity represents a speed in units per second, and the player will move at the same speed regardless of the frame rate. However, this can still be problematic if the frame rate is very low or very high. If the frame rate is very low, the player will move in large jumps. This may lead to a player moving in such large jumps that they pass through walls or other obstacles. In general, you cannot expect a physics simulation to behave nicely with *any* delta time. Ideally, we want to have some stability in what kinds of delta times we feed into our physics simulation. The solution is using a fixed timestep. This means that we advance the physics simulation by a fixed amount at a time. If the real time that passed between two frames is less than the fixed timestep, we simply don't advance the physics simulation at all. If it is more, we advance the physics simulation multiple times until we catch up. You can read more about how Bevy implements this in the documentation for [`bevy::time::Fixed`](https://docs.rs/bevy/latest/bevy/time/struct.Fixed.html). This leaves us with a last problem, however. If our physics simulation may advance zero or multiple times per frame, there may be frames in which the player's position did not need to be updated at all, and some where it is updated by a large amount that resulted from running the physics simulation multiple times. This is physically correct, but visually jarring. Imagine a player moving in a straight line, but depending on the frame rate, they may sometimes advance by a large amount and sometimes not at all. Visually, we want the player to move smoothly. This is why we need to separate the player's position in the physics simulation from the player's position in the visual representation. The visual representation can then be interpolated smoothly based on the last and current actual player position in the physics simulation. This is a tradeoff: every visual frame is now slightly lagging behind the actual physical frame, but in return, the player's movement will appear smooth. There are other ways to compute the visual representation of the player, such as extrapolation. See the [documentation of the lightyear crate](https://cbournhonesque.github.io/lightyear/book/concepts/advanced_replication/visual_interpolation.html) for a nice overview of the different methods and their tradeoffs. ## Implementation - The player's velocity is stored in a `Velocity` component. This is the speed in units per second. - The player's current position in the physics simulation is stored in a `PhysicalTranslation` component. - The player's previous position in the physics simulation is stored in a `PreviousPhysicalTranslation` component. - The player's visual representation is stored in Bevy's regular `Transform` component. - Every frame, we go through the following steps: - Advance the physics simulation by one fixed timestep in the `advance_physics` system. This is run in the `FixedUpdate` schedule, which runs before the `Update` schedule. - Update the player's visual representation in the `update_displayed_transform` system. This interpolates between the player's previous and current position in the physics simulation. - Update the player's velocity based on the player's input in the `handle_input` system. ## Relevant Issues Related to #1259. I'm also fairly sure I've seen an issue somewhere made by @alice-i-cecile about showing how to move a character correctly in a fixed timestep, but I cannot find it.
2024-07-09 14:23:10 +00:00
}
if keyboard_input.pressed(KeyCode::KeyD) {
Allow ordering variable timesteps around fixed timesteps (#14881) # Objective - Fixes #14873, see that issue for a whole lot of context ## Solution - Add a blessed system set for this stuff. See [this Discord discussion](https://discord.com/channels/691052431525675048/749335865876021248/1276262931327094908). Note that the gizmo systems, [LWIM](https://github.com/Leafwing-Studios/leafwing-input-manager/pull/522/files#diff-9b59ee4899ad0a5d008889ea89a124a7291316532e42f9f3d6ae842b906fb095R154) and now a new plugin I'm working on are all already ordering against `run_fixed_main_schedule`, so having a dedicated system set should be more robust and hopefully also more discoverable. --- ## ~~Showcase~~ ~~I can add a little video of a smooth camera later if this gets merged :)~~ Apparently a release note is not needed, so I'll leave it out. See the changes in the fixed timestep example for usage showcase and the video in #14873 for a more or less accurate video of the effect (it does not use the same solution though, so it is not quite the same) ## Migration Guide [run_fixed_main_schedule](https://docs.rs/bevy/latest/bevy/time/fn.run_fixed_main_schedule.html) is no longer public. If you used to order against it, use the new dedicated `RunFixedMainLoopSystem` system set instead. You can replace your usage of `run_fixed_main_schedule` one for one by `RunFixedMainLoopSystem::FixedMainLoop`, but it is now more idiomatic to place your systems in either `RunFixedMainLoopSystem::BeforeFixedMainLoop` or `RunFixedMainLoopSystem::AfterFixedMainLoop` Old: ```rust app.add_systems( RunFixedMainLoop, some_system.before(run_fixed_main_schedule) ); ``` New: ```rust app.add_systems( RunFixedMainLoop, some_system.in_set(RunFixedMainLoopSystem::BeforeFixedMainLoop) ); ``` --------- Co-authored-by: Tau Gärtli <git@tau.garden>
2024-08-23 16:19:42 +00:00
input.x += 1.0;
Add an example for doing movement in fixed timesteps (#14223) _copy-pasted from my doc comment in the code_ # Objective This example shows how to properly handle player input, advance a physics simulation in a fixed timestep, and display the results. The classic source for how and why this is done is Glenn Fiedler's article [Fix Your Timestep!](https://gafferongames.com/post/fix_your_timestep/). ## Motivation The naive way of moving a player is to just update their position like so: ```rust transform.translation += velocity; ``` The issue here is that the player's movement speed will be tied to the frame rate. Faster machines will move the player faster, and slower machines will move the player slower. In fact, you can observe this today when running some old games that did it this way on modern hardware! The player will move at a breakneck pace. The more sophisticated way is to update the player's position based on the time that has passed: ```rust transform.translation += velocity * time.delta_seconds(); ``` This way, velocity represents a speed in units per second, and the player will move at the same speed regardless of the frame rate. However, this can still be problematic if the frame rate is very low or very high. If the frame rate is very low, the player will move in large jumps. This may lead to a player moving in such large jumps that they pass through walls or other obstacles. In general, you cannot expect a physics simulation to behave nicely with *any* delta time. Ideally, we want to have some stability in what kinds of delta times we feed into our physics simulation. The solution is using a fixed timestep. This means that we advance the physics simulation by a fixed amount at a time. If the real time that passed between two frames is less than the fixed timestep, we simply don't advance the physics simulation at all. If it is more, we advance the physics simulation multiple times until we catch up. You can read more about how Bevy implements this in the documentation for [`bevy::time::Fixed`](https://docs.rs/bevy/latest/bevy/time/struct.Fixed.html). This leaves us with a last problem, however. If our physics simulation may advance zero or multiple times per frame, there may be frames in which the player's position did not need to be updated at all, and some where it is updated by a large amount that resulted from running the physics simulation multiple times. This is physically correct, but visually jarring. Imagine a player moving in a straight line, but depending on the frame rate, they may sometimes advance by a large amount and sometimes not at all. Visually, we want the player to move smoothly. This is why we need to separate the player's position in the physics simulation from the player's position in the visual representation. The visual representation can then be interpolated smoothly based on the last and current actual player position in the physics simulation. This is a tradeoff: every visual frame is now slightly lagging behind the actual physical frame, but in return, the player's movement will appear smooth. There are other ways to compute the visual representation of the player, such as extrapolation. See the [documentation of the lightyear crate](https://cbournhonesque.github.io/lightyear/book/concepts/advanced_replication/visual_interpolation.html) for a nice overview of the different methods and their tradeoffs. ## Implementation - The player's velocity is stored in a `Velocity` component. This is the speed in units per second. - The player's current position in the physics simulation is stored in a `PhysicalTranslation` component. - The player's previous position in the physics simulation is stored in a `PreviousPhysicalTranslation` component. - The player's visual representation is stored in Bevy's regular `Transform` component. - Every frame, we go through the following steps: - Advance the physics simulation by one fixed timestep in the `advance_physics` system. This is run in the `FixedUpdate` schedule, which runs before the `Update` schedule. - Update the player's visual representation in the `update_displayed_transform` system. This interpolates between the player's previous and current position in the physics simulation. - Update the player's velocity based on the player's input in the `handle_input` system. ## Relevant Issues Related to #1259. I'm also fairly sure I've seen an issue somewhere made by @alice-i-cecile about showing how to move a character correctly in a fixed timestep, but I cannot find it.
2024-07-09 14:23:10 +00:00
}
// Need to normalize and scale because otherwise
// diagonal movement would be faster than horizontal or vertical movement.
Allow ordering variable timesteps around fixed timesteps (#14881) # Objective - Fixes #14873, see that issue for a whole lot of context ## Solution - Add a blessed system set for this stuff. See [this Discord discussion](https://discord.com/channels/691052431525675048/749335865876021248/1276262931327094908). Note that the gizmo systems, [LWIM](https://github.com/Leafwing-Studios/leafwing-input-manager/pull/522/files#diff-9b59ee4899ad0a5d008889ea89a124a7291316532e42f9f3d6ae842b906fb095R154) and now a new plugin I'm working on are all already ordering against `run_fixed_main_schedule`, so having a dedicated system set should be more robust and hopefully also more discoverable. --- ## ~~Showcase~~ ~~I can add a little video of a smooth camera later if this gets merged :)~~ Apparently a release note is not needed, so I'll leave it out. See the changes in the fixed timestep example for usage showcase and the video in #14873 for a more or less accurate video of the effect (it does not use the same solution though, so it is not quite the same) ## Migration Guide [run_fixed_main_schedule](https://docs.rs/bevy/latest/bevy/time/fn.run_fixed_main_schedule.html) is no longer public. If you used to order against it, use the new dedicated `RunFixedMainLoopSystem` system set instead. You can replace your usage of `run_fixed_main_schedule` one for one by `RunFixedMainLoopSystem::FixedMainLoop`, but it is now more idiomatic to place your systems in either `RunFixedMainLoopSystem::BeforeFixedMainLoop` or `RunFixedMainLoopSystem::AfterFixedMainLoop` Old: ```rust app.add_systems( RunFixedMainLoop, some_system.before(run_fixed_main_schedule) ); ``` New: ```rust app.add_systems( RunFixedMainLoop, some_system.in_set(RunFixedMainLoopSystem::BeforeFixedMainLoop) ); ``` --------- Co-authored-by: Tau Gärtli <git@tau.garden>
2024-08-23 16:19:42 +00:00
// This effectively averages the accumulated input.
velocity.0 = input.extend(0.0).normalize_or_zero() * SPEED;
Add an example for doing movement in fixed timesteps (#14223) _copy-pasted from my doc comment in the code_ # Objective This example shows how to properly handle player input, advance a physics simulation in a fixed timestep, and display the results. The classic source for how and why this is done is Glenn Fiedler's article [Fix Your Timestep!](https://gafferongames.com/post/fix_your_timestep/). ## Motivation The naive way of moving a player is to just update their position like so: ```rust transform.translation += velocity; ``` The issue here is that the player's movement speed will be tied to the frame rate. Faster machines will move the player faster, and slower machines will move the player slower. In fact, you can observe this today when running some old games that did it this way on modern hardware! The player will move at a breakneck pace. The more sophisticated way is to update the player's position based on the time that has passed: ```rust transform.translation += velocity * time.delta_seconds(); ``` This way, velocity represents a speed in units per second, and the player will move at the same speed regardless of the frame rate. However, this can still be problematic if the frame rate is very low or very high. If the frame rate is very low, the player will move in large jumps. This may lead to a player moving in such large jumps that they pass through walls or other obstacles. In general, you cannot expect a physics simulation to behave nicely with *any* delta time. Ideally, we want to have some stability in what kinds of delta times we feed into our physics simulation. The solution is using a fixed timestep. This means that we advance the physics simulation by a fixed amount at a time. If the real time that passed between two frames is less than the fixed timestep, we simply don't advance the physics simulation at all. If it is more, we advance the physics simulation multiple times until we catch up. You can read more about how Bevy implements this in the documentation for [`bevy::time::Fixed`](https://docs.rs/bevy/latest/bevy/time/struct.Fixed.html). This leaves us with a last problem, however. If our physics simulation may advance zero or multiple times per frame, there may be frames in which the player's position did not need to be updated at all, and some where it is updated by a large amount that resulted from running the physics simulation multiple times. This is physically correct, but visually jarring. Imagine a player moving in a straight line, but depending on the frame rate, they may sometimes advance by a large amount and sometimes not at all. Visually, we want the player to move smoothly. This is why we need to separate the player's position in the physics simulation from the player's position in the visual representation. The visual representation can then be interpolated smoothly based on the last and current actual player position in the physics simulation. This is a tradeoff: every visual frame is now slightly lagging behind the actual physical frame, but in return, the player's movement will appear smooth. There are other ways to compute the visual representation of the player, such as extrapolation. See the [documentation of the lightyear crate](https://cbournhonesque.github.io/lightyear/book/concepts/advanced_replication/visual_interpolation.html) for a nice overview of the different methods and their tradeoffs. ## Implementation - The player's velocity is stored in a `Velocity` component. This is the speed in units per second. - The player's current position in the physics simulation is stored in a `PhysicalTranslation` component. - The player's previous position in the physics simulation is stored in a `PreviousPhysicalTranslation` component. - The player's visual representation is stored in Bevy's regular `Transform` component. - Every frame, we go through the following steps: - Advance the physics simulation by one fixed timestep in the `advance_physics` system. This is run in the `FixedUpdate` schedule, which runs before the `Update` schedule. - Update the player's visual representation in the `update_displayed_transform` system. This interpolates between the player's previous and current position in the physics simulation. - Update the player's velocity based on the player's input in the `handle_input` system. ## Relevant Issues Related to #1259. I'm also fairly sure I've seen an issue somewhere made by @alice-i-cecile about showing how to move a character correctly in a fixed timestep, but I cannot find it.
2024-07-09 14:23:10 +00:00
}
}
/// Advance the physics simulation by one fixed timestep. This may run zero or multiple times per frame.
///
/// Note that since this runs in `FixedUpdate`, `Res<Time>` would be `Res<Time<Fixed>>` automatically.
/// We are being explicit here for clarity.
fn advance_physics(
fixed_time: Res<Time<Fixed>>,
mut query: Query<(
&mut PhysicalTranslation,
&mut PreviousPhysicalTranslation,
Allow ordering variable timesteps around fixed timesteps (#14881) # Objective - Fixes #14873, see that issue for a whole lot of context ## Solution - Add a blessed system set for this stuff. See [this Discord discussion](https://discord.com/channels/691052431525675048/749335865876021248/1276262931327094908). Note that the gizmo systems, [LWIM](https://github.com/Leafwing-Studios/leafwing-input-manager/pull/522/files#diff-9b59ee4899ad0a5d008889ea89a124a7291316532e42f9f3d6ae842b906fb095R154) and now a new plugin I'm working on are all already ordering against `run_fixed_main_schedule`, so having a dedicated system set should be more robust and hopefully also more discoverable. --- ## ~~Showcase~~ ~~I can add a little video of a smooth camera later if this gets merged :)~~ Apparently a release note is not needed, so I'll leave it out. See the changes in the fixed timestep example for usage showcase and the video in #14873 for a more or less accurate video of the effect (it does not use the same solution though, so it is not quite the same) ## Migration Guide [run_fixed_main_schedule](https://docs.rs/bevy/latest/bevy/time/fn.run_fixed_main_schedule.html) is no longer public. If you used to order against it, use the new dedicated `RunFixedMainLoopSystem` system set instead. You can replace your usage of `run_fixed_main_schedule` one for one by `RunFixedMainLoopSystem::FixedMainLoop`, but it is now more idiomatic to place your systems in either `RunFixedMainLoopSystem::BeforeFixedMainLoop` or `RunFixedMainLoopSystem::AfterFixedMainLoop` Old: ```rust app.add_systems( RunFixedMainLoop, some_system.before(run_fixed_main_schedule) ); ``` New: ```rust app.add_systems( RunFixedMainLoop, some_system.in_set(RunFixedMainLoopSystem::BeforeFixedMainLoop) ); ``` --------- Co-authored-by: Tau Gärtli <git@tau.garden>
2024-08-23 16:19:42 +00:00
&mut AccumulatedInput,
Add an example for doing movement in fixed timesteps (#14223) _copy-pasted from my doc comment in the code_ # Objective This example shows how to properly handle player input, advance a physics simulation in a fixed timestep, and display the results. The classic source for how and why this is done is Glenn Fiedler's article [Fix Your Timestep!](https://gafferongames.com/post/fix_your_timestep/). ## Motivation The naive way of moving a player is to just update their position like so: ```rust transform.translation += velocity; ``` The issue here is that the player's movement speed will be tied to the frame rate. Faster machines will move the player faster, and slower machines will move the player slower. In fact, you can observe this today when running some old games that did it this way on modern hardware! The player will move at a breakneck pace. The more sophisticated way is to update the player's position based on the time that has passed: ```rust transform.translation += velocity * time.delta_seconds(); ``` This way, velocity represents a speed in units per second, and the player will move at the same speed regardless of the frame rate. However, this can still be problematic if the frame rate is very low or very high. If the frame rate is very low, the player will move in large jumps. This may lead to a player moving in such large jumps that they pass through walls or other obstacles. In general, you cannot expect a physics simulation to behave nicely with *any* delta time. Ideally, we want to have some stability in what kinds of delta times we feed into our physics simulation. The solution is using a fixed timestep. This means that we advance the physics simulation by a fixed amount at a time. If the real time that passed between two frames is less than the fixed timestep, we simply don't advance the physics simulation at all. If it is more, we advance the physics simulation multiple times until we catch up. You can read more about how Bevy implements this in the documentation for [`bevy::time::Fixed`](https://docs.rs/bevy/latest/bevy/time/struct.Fixed.html). This leaves us with a last problem, however. If our physics simulation may advance zero or multiple times per frame, there may be frames in which the player's position did not need to be updated at all, and some where it is updated by a large amount that resulted from running the physics simulation multiple times. This is physically correct, but visually jarring. Imagine a player moving in a straight line, but depending on the frame rate, they may sometimes advance by a large amount and sometimes not at all. Visually, we want the player to move smoothly. This is why we need to separate the player's position in the physics simulation from the player's position in the visual representation. The visual representation can then be interpolated smoothly based on the last and current actual player position in the physics simulation. This is a tradeoff: every visual frame is now slightly lagging behind the actual physical frame, but in return, the player's movement will appear smooth. There are other ways to compute the visual representation of the player, such as extrapolation. See the [documentation of the lightyear crate](https://cbournhonesque.github.io/lightyear/book/concepts/advanced_replication/visual_interpolation.html) for a nice overview of the different methods and their tradeoffs. ## Implementation - The player's velocity is stored in a `Velocity` component. This is the speed in units per second. - The player's current position in the physics simulation is stored in a `PhysicalTranslation` component. - The player's previous position in the physics simulation is stored in a `PreviousPhysicalTranslation` component. - The player's visual representation is stored in Bevy's regular `Transform` component. - Every frame, we go through the following steps: - Advance the physics simulation by one fixed timestep in the `advance_physics` system. This is run in the `FixedUpdate` schedule, which runs before the `Update` schedule. - Update the player's visual representation in the `update_displayed_transform` system. This interpolates between the player's previous and current position in the physics simulation. - Update the player's velocity based on the player's input in the `handle_input` system. ## Relevant Issues Related to #1259. I'm also fairly sure I've seen an issue somewhere made by @alice-i-cecile about showing how to move a character correctly in a fixed timestep, but I cannot find it.
2024-07-09 14:23:10 +00:00
&Velocity,
)>,
) {
Allow ordering variable timesteps around fixed timesteps (#14881) # Objective - Fixes #14873, see that issue for a whole lot of context ## Solution - Add a blessed system set for this stuff. See [this Discord discussion](https://discord.com/channels/691052431525675048/749335865876021248/1276262931327094908). Note that the gizmo systems, [LWIM](https://github.com/Leafwing-Studios/leafwing-input-manager/pull/522/files#diff-9b59ee4899ad0a5d008889ea89a124a7291316532e42f9f3d6ae842b906fb095R154) and now a new plugin I'm working on are all already ordering against `run_fixed_main_schedule`, so having a dedicated system set should be more robust and hopefully also more discoverable. --- ## ~~Showcase~~ ~~I can add a little video of a smooth camera later if this gets merged :)~~ Apparently a release note is not needed, so I'll leave it out. See the changes in the fixed timestep example for usage showcase and the video in #14873 for a more or less accurate video of the effect (it does not use the same solution though, so it is not quite the same) ## Migration Guide [run_fixed_main_schedule](https://docs.rs/bevy/latest/bevy/time/fn.run_fixed_main_schedule.html) is no longer public. If you used to order against it, use the new dedicated `RunFixedMainLoopSystem` system set instead. You can replace your usage of `run_fixed_main_schedule` one for one by `RunFixedMainLoopSystem::FixedMainLoop`, but it is now more idiomatic to place your systems in either `RunFixedMainLoopSystem::BeforeFixedMainLoop` or `RunFixedMainLoopSystem::AfterFixedMainLoop` Old: ```rust app.add_systems( RunFixedMainLoop, some_system.before(run_fixed_main_schedule) ); ``` New: ```rust app.add_systems( RunFixedMainLoop, some_system.in_set(RunFixedMainLoopSystem::BeforeFixedMainLoop) ); ``` --------- Co-authored-by: Tau Gärtli <git@tau.garden>
2024-08-23 16:19:42 +00:00
for (
mut current_physical_translation,
mut previous_physical_translation,
mut input,
velocity,
) in query.iter_mut()
Add an example for doing movement in fixed timesteps (#14223) _copy-pasted from my doc comment in the code_ # Objective This example shows how to properly handle player input, advance a physics simulation in a fixed timestep, and display the results. The classic source for how and why this is done is Glenn Fiedler's article [Fix Your Timestep!](https://gafferongames.com/post/fix_your_timestep/). ## Motivation The naive way of moving a player is to just update their position like so: ```rust transform.translation += velocity; ``` The issue here is that the player's movement speed will be tied to the frame rate. Faster machines will move the player faster, and slower machines will move the player slower. In fact, you can observe this today when running some old games that did it this way on modern hardware! The player will move at a breakneck pace. The more sophisticated way is to update the player's position based on the time that has passed: ```rust transform.translation += velocity * time.delta_seconds(); ``` This way, velocity represents a speed in units per second, and the player will move at the same speed regardless of the frame rate. However, this can still be problematic if the frame rate is very low or very high. If the frame rate is very low, the player will move in large jumps. This may lead to a player moving in such large jumps that they pass through walls or other obstacles. In general, you cannot expect a physics simulation to behave nicely with *any* delta time. Ideally, we want to have some stability in what kinds of delta times we feed into our physics simulation. The solution is using a fixed timestep. This means that we advance the physics simulation by a fixed amount at a time. If the real time that passed between two frames is less than the fixed timestep, we simply don't advance the physics simulation at all. If it is more, we advance the physics simulation multiple times until we catch up. You can read more about how Bevy implements this in the documentation for [`bevy::time::Fixed`](https://docs.rs/bevy/latest/bevy/time/struct.Fixed.html). This leaves us with a last problem, however. If our physics simulation may advance zero or multiple times per frame, there may be frames in which the player's position did not need to be updated at all, and some where it is updated by a large amount that resulted from running the physics simulation multiple times. This is physically correct, but visually jarring. Imagine a player moving in a straight line, but depending on the frame rate, they may sometimes advance by a large amount and sometimes not at all. Visually, we want the player to move smoothly. This is why we need to separate the player's position in the physics simulation from the player's position in the visual representation. The visual representation can then be interpolated smoothly based on the last and current actual player position in the physics simulation. This is a tradeoff: every visual frame is now slightly lagging behind the actual physical frame, but in return, the player's movement will appear smooth. There are other ways to compute the visual representation of the player, such as extrapolation. See the [documentation of the lightyear crate](https://cbournhonesque.github.io/lightyear/book/concepts/advanced_replication/visual_interpolation.html) for a nice overview of the different methods and their tradeoffs. ## Implementation - The player's velocity is stored in a `Velocity` component. This is the speed in units per second. - The player's current position in the physics simulation is stored in a `PhysicalTranslation` component. - The player's previous position in the physics simulation is stored in a `PreviousPhysicalTranslation` component. - The player's visual representation is stored in Bevy's regular `Transform` component. - Every frame, we go through the following steps: - Advance the physics simulation by one fixed timestep in the `advance_physics` system. This is run in the `FixedUpdate` schedule, which runs before the `Update` schedule. - Update the player's visual representation in the `update_displayed_transform` system. This interpolates between the player's previous and current position in the physics simulation. - Update the player's velocity based on the player's input in the `handle_input` system. ## Relevant Issues Related to #1259. I'm also fairly sure I've seen an issue somewhere made by @alice-i-cecile about showing how to move a character correctly in a fixed timestep, but I cannot find it.
2024-07-09 14:23:10 +00:00
{
previous_physical_translation.0 = current_physical_translation.0;
current_physical_translation.0 += velocity.0 * fixed_time.delta_seconds();
Allow ordering variable timesteps around fixed timesteps (#14881) # Objective - Fixes #14873, see that issue for a whole lot of context ## Solution - Add a blessed system set for this stuff. See [this Discord discussion](https://discord.com/channels/691052431525675048/749335865876021248/1276262931327094908). Note that the gizmo systems, [LWIM](https://github.com/Leafwing-Studios/leafwing-input-manager/pull/522/files#diff-9b59ee4899ad0a5d008889ea89a124a7291316532e42f9f3d6ae842b906fb095R154) and now a new plugin I'm working on are all already ordering against `run_fixed_main_schedule`, so having a dedicated system set should be more robust and hopefully also more discoverable. --- ## ~~Showcase~~ ~~I can add a little video of a smooth camera later if this gets merged :)~~ Apparently a release note is not needed, so I'll leave it out. See the changes in the fixed timestep example for usage showcase and the video in #14873 for a more or less accurate video of the effect (it does not use the same solution though, so it is not quite the same) ## Migration Guide [run_fixed_main_schedule](https://docs.rs/bevy/latest/bevy/time/fn.run_fixed_main_schedule.html) is no longer public. If you used to order against it, use the new dedicated `RunFixedMainLoopSystem` system set instead. You can replace your usage of `run_fixed_main_schedule` one for one by `RunFixedMainLoopSystem::FixedMainLoop`, but it is now more idiomatic to place your systems in either `RunFixedMainLoopSystem::BeforeFixedMainLoop` or `RunFixedMainLoopSystem::AfterFixedMainLoop` Old: ```rust app.add_systems( RunFixedMainLoop, some_system.before(run_fixed_main_schedule) ); ``` New: ```rust app.add_systems( RunFixedMainLoop, some_system.in_set(RunFixedMainLoopSystem::BeforeFixedMainLoop) ); ``` --------- Co-authored-by: Tau Gärtli <git@tau.garden>
2024-08-23 16:19:42 +00:00
// Reset the input accumulator, as we are currently consuming all input that happened since the last fixed timestep.
input.0 = Vec2::ZERO;
Add an example for doing movement in fixed timesteps (#14223) _copy-pasted from my doc comment in the code_ # Objective This example shows how to properly handle player input, advance a physics simulation in a fixed timestep, and display the results. The classic source for how and why this is done is Glenn Fiedler's article [Fix Your Timestep!](https://gafferongames.com/post/fix_your_timestep/). ## Motivation The naive way of moving a player is to just update their position like so: ```rust transform.translation += velocity; ``` The issue here is that the player's movement speed will be tied to the frame rate. Faster machines will move the player faster, and slower machines will move the player slower. In fact, you can observe this today when running some old games that did it this way on modern hardware! The player will move at a breakneck pace. The more sophisticated way is to update the player's position based on the time that has passed: ```rust transform.translation += velocity * time.delta_seconds(); ``` This way, velocity represents a speed in units per second, and the player will move at the same speed regardless of the frame rate. However, this can still be problematic if the frame rate is very low or very high. If the frame rate is very low, the player will move in large jumps. This may lead to a player moving in such large jumps that they pass through walls or other obstacles. In general, you cannot expect a physics simulation to behave nicely with *any* delta time. Ideally, we want to have some stability in what kinds of delta times we feed into our physics simulation. The solution is using a fixed timestep. This means that we advance the physics simulation by a fixed amount at a time. If the real time that passed between two frames is less than the fixed timestep, we simply don't advance the physics simulation at all. If it is more, we advance the physics simulation multiple times until we catch up. You can read more about how Bevy implements this in the documentation for [`bevy::time::Fixed`](https://docs.rs/bevy/latest/bevy/time/struct.Fixed.html). This leaves us with a last problem, however. If our physics simulation may advance zero or multiple times per frame, there may be frames in which the player's position did not need to be updated at all, and some where it is updated by a large amount that resulted from running the physics simulation multiple times. This is physically correct, but visually jarring. Imagine a player moving in a straight line, but depending on the frame rate, they may sometimes advance by a large amount and sometimes not at all. Visually, we want the player to move smoothly. This is why we need to separate the player's position in the physics simulation from the player's position in the visual representation. The visual representation can then be interpolated smoothly based on the last and current actual player position in the physics simulation. This is a tradeoff: every visual frame is now slightly lagging behind the actual physical frame, but in return, the player's movement will appear smooth. There are other ways to compute the visual representation of the player, such as extrapolation. See the [documentation of the lightyear crate](https://cbournhonesque.github.io/lightyear/book/concepts/advanced_replication/visual_interpolation.html) for a nice overview of the different methods and their tradeoffs. ## Implementation - The player's velocity is stored in a `Velocity` component. This is the speed in units per second. - The player's current position in the physics simulation is stored in a `PhysicalTranslation` component. - The player's previous position in the physics simulation is stored in a `PreviousPhysicalTranslation` component. - The player's visual representation is stored in Bevy's regular `Transform` component. - Every frame, we go through the following steps: - Advance the physics simulation by one fixed timestep in the `advance_physics` system. This is run in the `FixedUpdate` schedule, which runs before the `Update` schedule. - Update the player's visual representation in the `update_displayed_transform` system. This interpolates between the player's previous and current position in the physics simulation. - Update the player's velocity based on the player's input in the `handle_input` system. ## Relevant Issues Related to #1259. I'm also fairly sure I've seen an issue somewhere made by @alice-i-cecile about showing how to move a character correctly in a fixed timestep, but I cannot find it.
2024-07-09 14:23:10 +00:00
}
}
Allow ordering variable timesteps around fixed timesteps (#14881) # Objective - Fixes #14873, see that issue for a whole lot of context ## Solution - Add a blessed system set for this stuff. See [this Discord discussion](https://discord.com/channels/691052431525675048/749335865876021248/1276262931327094908). Note that the gizmo systems, [LWIM](https://github.com/Leafwing-Studios/leafwing-input-manager/pull/522/files#diff-9b59ee4899ad0a5d008889ea89a124a7291316532e42f9f3d6ae842b906fb095R154) and now a new plugin I'm working on are all already ordering against `run_fixed_main_schedule`, so having a dedicated system set should be more robust and hopefully also more discoverable. --- ## ~~Showcase~~ ~~I can add a little video of a smooth camera later if this gets merged :)~~ Apparently a release note is not needed, so I'll leave it out. See the changes in the fixed timestep example for usage showcase and the video in #14873 for a more or less accurate video of the effect (it does not use the same solution though, so it is not quite the same) ## Migration Guide [run_fixed_main_schedule](https://docs.rs/bevy/latest/bevy/time/fn.run_fixed_main_schedule.html) is no longer public. If you used to order against it, use the new dedicated `RunFixedMainLoopSystem` system set instead. You can replace your usage of `run_fixed_main_schedule` one for one by `RunFixedMainLoopSystem::FixedMainLoop`, but it is now more idiomatic to place your systems in either `RunFixedMainLoopSystem::BeforeFixedMainLoop` or `RunFixedMainLoopSystem::AfterFixedMainLoop` Old: ```rust app.add_systems( RunFixedMainLoop, some_system.before(run_fixed_main_schedule) ); ``` New: ```rust app.add_systems( RunFixedMainLoop, some_system.in_set(RunFixedMainLoopSystem::BeforeFixedMainLoop) ); ``` --------- Co-authored-by: Tau Gärtli <git@tau.garden>
2024-08-23 16:19:42 +00:00
fn interpolate_rendered_transform(
Add an example for doing movement in fixed timesteps (#14223) _copy-pasted from my doc comment in the code_ # Objective This example shows how to properly handle player input, advance a physics simulation in a fixed timestep, and display the results. The classic source for how and why this is done is Glenn Fiedler's article [Fix Your Timestep!](https://gafferongames.com/post/fix_your_timestep/). ## Motivation The naive way of moving a player is to just update their position like so: ```rust transform.translation += velocity; ``` The issue here is that the player's movement speed will be tied to the frame rate. Faster machines will move the player faster, and slower machines will move the player slower. In fact, you can observe this today when running some old games that did it this way on modern hardware! The player will move at a breakneck pace. The more sophisticated way is to update the player's position based on the time that has passed: ```rust transform.translation += velocity * time.delta_seconds(); ``` This way, velocity represents a speed in units per second, and the player will move at the same speed regardless of the frame rate. However, this can still be problematic if the frame rate is very low or very high. If the frame rate is very low, the player will move in large jumps. This may lead to a player moving in such large jumps that they pass through walls or other obstacles. In general, you cannot expect a physics simulation to behave nicely with *any* delta time. Ideally, we want to have some stability in what kinds of delta times we feed into our physics simulation. The solution is using a fixed timestep. This means that we advance the physics simulation by a fixed amount at a time. If the real time that passed between two frames is less than the fixed timestep, we simply don't advance the physics simulation at all. If it is more, we advance the physics simulation multiple times until we catch up. You can read more about how Bevy implements this in the documentation for [`bevy::time::Fixed`](https://docs.rs/bevy/latest/bevy/time/struct.Fixed.html). This leaves us with a last problem, however. If our physics simulation may advance zero or multiple times per frame, there may be frames in which the player's position did not need to be updated at all, and some where it is updated by a large amount that resulted from running the physics simulation multiple times. This is physically correct, but visually jarring. Imagine a player moving in a straight line, but depending on the frame rate, they may sometimes advance by a large amount and sometimes not at all. Visually, we want the player to move smoothly. This is why we need to separate the player's position in the physics simulation from the player's position in the visual representation. The visual representation can then be interpolated smoothly based on the last and current actual player position in the physics simulation. This is a tradeoff: every visual frame is now slightly lagging behind the actual physical frame, but in return, the player's movement will appear smooth. There are other ways to compute the visual representation of the player, such as extrapolation. See the [documentation of the lightyear crate](https://cbournhonesque.github.io/lightyear/book/concepts/advanced_replication/visual_interpolation.html) for a nice overview of the different methods and their tradeoffs. ## Implementation - The player's velocity is stored in a `Velocity` component. This is the speed in units per second. - The player's current position in the physics simulation is stored in a `PhysicalTranslation` component. - The player's previous position in the physics simulation is stored in a `PreviousPhysicalTranslation` component. - The player's visual representation is stored in Bevy's regular `Transform` component. - Every frame, we go through the following steps: - Advance the physics simulation by one fixed timestep in the `advance_physics` system. This is run in the `FixedUpdate` schedule, which runs before the `Update` schedule. - Update the player's visual representation in the `update_displayed_transform` system. This interpolates between the player's previous and current position in the physics simulation. - Update the player's velocity based on the player's input in the `handle_input` system. ## Relevant Issues Related to #1259. I'm also fairly sure I've seen an issue somewhere made by @alice-i-cecile about showing how to move a character correctly in a fixed timestep, but I cannot find it.
2024-07-09 14:23:10 +00:00
fixed_time: Res<Time<Fixed>>,
mut query: Query<(
&mut Transform,
&PhysicalTranslation,
&PreviousPhysicalTranslation,
)>,
) {
for (mut transform, current_physical_translation, previous_physical_translation) in
query.iter_mut()
{
let previous = previous_physical_translation.0;
let current = current_physical_translation.0;
// The overstep fraction is a value between 0 and 1 that tells us how far we are between two fixed timesteps.
let alpha = fixed_time.overstep_fraction();
let rendered_translation = previous.lerp(current, alpha);
transform.translation = rendered_translation;
}
}
Reference in a new issue Copy permalink