Mirrors/bevy
2
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy synced 2025-01-08 11:18:55 +00:00
Code Issues Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity
bevy/crates/bevy_macro_utils/src/lib.rs

18 lines
325 B
Rust
Raw Normal View History

Moved `fq_std` from `bevy_reflect_derive` to `bevy_macro_utils` (#9956) # Objective - Fixes #9363 ## Solution Moved `fq_std` from `bevy_reflect_derive` to `bevy_macro_utils`. This does make the `FQ*` types public where they were previously private, which is a change to the public-facing API, but I don't believe a breaking one. Additionally, I've done a basic QA pass over the `bevy_macro_utils` crate, adding `deny(unsafe)`, `warn(missing_docs)`, and documentation where required.
2023-10-02 00:22:57 +00:00
#![deny(unsafe_code)]
//! A collection of helper types and functions for working on macros within the Bevy ecosystem.
Suppress the `clippy::type_complexity` lint (#8313) # Objective The clippy lint `type_complexity` is known not to play well with bevy. It frequently triggers when writing complex queries, and taking the lint's advice of using a type alias almost always just obfuscates the code with no benefit. Because of this, this lint is currently ignored in CI, but unfortunately it still shows up when viewing bevy code in an IDE. As someone who's made a fair amount of pull requests to this repo, I will say that this issue has been a consistent thorn in my side. Since bevy code is filled with spurious, ignorable warnings, it can be very difficult to spot the *real* warnings that must be fixed -- most of the time I just ignore all warnings, only to later find out that one of them was real after I'm done when CI runs. ## Solution Suppress this lint in all bevy crates. This was previously attempted in #7050, but the review process ended up making it more complicated than it needs to be and landed on a subpar solution. The discussion in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/pull/10571 explores some better long-term solutions to this problem. Since there is no timeline on when these solutions may land, we should resolve this issue in the meantime by locally suppressing these lints. ### Unresolved issues Currently, these lints are not suppressed in our examples, since that would require suppressing the lint in every single source file. They are still ignored in CI.
2023-04-06 21:27:36 +00:00
Use bevy_reflect as path in case of no direct references (#1875) Fixes #1844 Co-authored-by: Carter Anderson <mcanders1@gmail.com>
2021-05-19 19:03:36 +00:00
extern crate proc_macro;
Implement and require `#[derive(Component)]` on all component structs (#2254) This implements the most minimal variant of #1843 - a derive for marker trait. This is a prerequisite to more complicated features like statically defined storage type or opt-out component reflection. In order to make component struct's purpose explicit and avoid misuse, it must be annotated with `#[derive(Component)]` (manual impl is discouraged for compatibility). Right now this is just a marker trait, but in the future it might be expanded. Making this change early allows us to make further changes later without breaking backward compatibility for derive macro users. This already prevents a lot of issues, like using bundles in `insert` calls. Primitive types are no longer valid components as well. This can be easily worked around by adding newtype wrappers and deriving `Component` for them. One funny example of prevented bad code (from our own tests) is when an newtype struct or enum variant is used. Previously, it was possible to write `insert(Newtype)` instead of `insert(Newtype(value))`. That code compiled, because function pointers (in this case newtype struct constructor) implement `Send + Sync + 'static`, so we allowed them to be used as components. This is no longer the case and such invalid code will trigger a compile error. Co-authored-by: = <=> Co-authored-by: TheRawMeatball <therawmeatball@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Carter Anderson <mcanders1@gmail.com>
2021-10-03 19:23:44 +00:00
mod attrs;
Moved `fq_std` from `bevy_reflect_derive` to `bevy_macro_utils` (#9956) # Objective - Fixes #9363 ## Solution Moved `fq_std` from `bevy_reflect_derive` to `bevy_macro_utils`. This does make the `FQ*` types public where they were previously private, which is a change to the public-facing API, but I don't believe a breaking one. Additionally, I've done a basic QA pass over the `bevy_macro_utils` crate, adding `deny(unsafe)`, `warn(missing_docs)`, and documentation where required.
2023-10-02 00:22:57 +00:00
mod bevy_manifest;
pub mod fq_std;
mod label;
Don't panic in macro shape validation (#3647) # Objective Emitting compile errors produces cleaner messages than panicking in a proc-macro. ## Solution - Replace match-with-panic code with call to new `bevy_macro_utils::get_named_struct_fields` function - Replace one use of match-with-panic for enums with inline match _Aside:_ I'm also the maintainer of [`darling`](https://docs.rs/darling), a crate which provides a serde-like API for parsing macro inputs. I avoided using it here because it seemed like overkill, but if there are plans to add lots more attributes/macros then that might be a good way of offloading macro error handling.
2022-01-15 22:14:43 +00:00
mod shape;
Implement and require `#[derive(Component)]` on all component structs (#2254) This implements the most minimal variant of #1843 - a derive for marker trait. This is a prerequisite to more complicated features like statically defined storage type or opt-out component reflection. In order to make component struct's purpose explicit and avoid misuse, it must be annotated with `#[derive(Component)]` (manual impl is discouraged for compatibility). Right now this is just a marker trait, but in the future it might be expanded. Making this change early allows us to make further changes later without breaking backward compatibility for derive macro users. This already prevents a lot of issues, like using bundles in `insert` calls. Primitive types are no longer valid components as well. This can be easily worked around by adding newtype wrappers and deriving `Component` for them. One funny example of prevented bad code (from our own tests) is when an newtype struct or enum variant is used. Previously, it was possible to write `insert(Newtype)` instead of `insert(Newtype(value))`. That code compiled, because function pointers (in this case newtype struct constructor) implement `Send + Sync + 'static`, so we allowed them to be used as components. This is no longer the case and such invalid code will trigger a compile error. Co-authored-by: = <=> Co-authored-by: TheRawMeatball <therawmeatball@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Carter Anderson <mcanders1@gmail.com>
2021-10-03 19:23:44 +00:00
mod symbol;
pub use attrs::*;
Moved `fq_std` from `bevy_reflect_derive` to `bevy_macro_utils` (#9956) # Objective - Fixes #9363 ## Solution Moved `fq_std` from `bevy_reflect_derive` to `bevy_macro_utils`. This does make the `FQ*` types public where they were previously private, which is a change to the public-facing API, but I don't believe a breaking one. Additionally, I've done a basic QA pass over the `bevy_macro_utils` crate, adding `deny(unsafe)`, `warn(missing_docs)`, and documentation where required.
2023-10-02 00:22:57 +00:00
pub use bevy_manifest::*;
pub use label::*;
Don't panic in macro shape validation (#3647) # Objective Emitting compile errors produces cleaner messages than panicking in a proc-macro. ## Solution - Replace match-with-panic code with call to new `bevy_macro_utils::get_named_struct_fields` function - Replace one use of match-with-panic for enums with inline match _Aside:_ I'm also the maintainer of [`darling`](https://docs.rs/darling), a crate which provides a serde-like API for parsing macro inputs. I avoided using it here because it seemed like overkill, but if there are plans to add lots more attributes/macros then that might be a good way of offloading macro error handling.
2022-01-15 22:14:43 +00:00
pub use shape::*;
Implement and require `#[derive(Component)]` on all component structs (#2254) This implements the most minimal variant of #1843 - a derive for marker trait. This is a prerequisite to more complicated features like statically defined storage type or opt-out component reflection. In order to make component struct's purpose explicit and avoid misuse, it must be annotated with `#[derive(Component)]` (manual impl is discouraged for compatibility). Right now this is just a marker trait, but in the future it might be expanded. Making this change early allows us to make further changes later without breaking backward compatibility for derive macro users. This already prevents a lot of issues, like using bundles in `insert` calls. Primitive types are no longer valid components as well. This can be easily worked around by adding newtype wrappers and deriving `Component` for them. One funny example of prevented bad code (from our own tests) is when an newtype struct or enum variant is used. Previously, it was possible to write `insert(Newtype)` instead of `insert(Newtype(value))`. That code compiled, because function pointers (in this case newtype struct constructor) implement `Send + Sync + 'static`, so we allowed them to be used as components. This is no longer the case and such invalid code will trigger a compile error. Co-authored-by: = <=> Co-authored-by: TheRawMeatball <therawmeatball@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Carter Anderson <mcanders1@gmail.com>
2021-10-03 19:23:44 +00:00
pub use symbol::*;
Reference in a new issue Copy permalink