bevy/crates/bevy_pbr/src/meshlet/material_shade_nodes.rs

391 lines
13 KiB
Rust
Raw Normal View History

use super::{
Meshlet software raster + start of cleanup (#14623) # Objective - Faster meshlet rasterization path for small triangles - Avoid having to allocate and write out a triangle buffer - Refactor gpu_scene.rs ## Solution - Replace the 32bit visbuffer texture with a 64bit visbuffer buffer, where the left 32 bits encode depth, and the right 32 bits encode the existing cluster + triangle IDs. Can't use 64bit textures, wgpu/naga doesn't support atomic ops on textures yet. - Instead of writing out a buffer of packed cluster + triangle IDs (per triangle) to raster, the culling pass now writes out a buffer of just cluster IDs (per cluster, so less memory allocated, cheaper to write out). - Clusters for software raster are allocated from the left side - Clusters for hardware raster are allocated in the same buffer, from the right side - The buffer size is fixed at MeshletPlugin build time, and should be set to a reasonable value for your scene (no warning on overflow, and no good way to determine what value you need outside of renderdoc - I plan to fix this in a future PR adding a meshlet stats overlay) - Currently I don't have a heuristic for software vs hardware raster selection for each cluster. The existing code is just a placeholder. I need to profile on a release scene and come up with a heuristic, probably in a future PR. - The culling shader is getting pretty hard to follow at this point, but I don't want to spend time improving it as the entire shader/pass is getting rewritten/replaced in the near future. - Software raster is a compute workgroup per-cluster. Each workgroup loads and transforms the <=64 vertices of the cluster, and then rasterizes the <=64 triangles of the cluster. - Two variants are implemented: Scanline for clusters with any larger triangles (still smaller than hardware is good at), and brute-force for very very tiny triangles - Once the shader determines that a pixel should be filled in, it does an atomicMax() on the visbuffer to store the results, copying how Nanite works - On devices with a low max workgroups per dispatch limit, an extra compute pass is inserted before software raster to convert from a 1d to 2d dispatch (I don't think 3d would ever be necessary). - I haven't implemented the top-left rule or subpixel precision yet, I'm leaving that for a future PR since I get usable results without it for now - Resources used: https://kristoffer-dyrkorn.github.io/triangle-rasterizer and chapters 6-8 of https://fgiesen.wordpress.com/2013/02/17/optimizing-sw-occlusion-culling-index - Hardware raster now spawns 64*3 vertex invocations per meshlet, instead of the actual meshlet vertex count. Extra invocations just early-exit. - While this is slower than the existing system, hardware draws should be rare now that software raster is usable, and it saves a ton of memory using the unified cluster ID buffer. This would be fixed if wgpu had support for mesh shaders. - Instead of writing to a color+depth attachment, the hardware raster pass also does the same atomic visbuffer writes that software raster uses. - We have to bind a dummy render target anyways, as wgpu doesn't currently support render passes without any attachments - Material IDs are no longer written out during the main rasterization passes. - If we had async compute queues, we could overlap the software and hardware raster passes. - New material and depth resolve passes run at the end of the visbuffer node, and write out view depth and material ID depth textures ### Misc changes - Fixed cluster culling importing, but never actually using the previous view uniforms when doing occlusion culling - Fixed incorrectly adding the LOD error twice when building the meshlet mesh - Splitup gpu_scene module into meshlet_mesh_manager, instance_manager, and resource_manager - resource_manager is still too complex and inefficient (extract and prepare are way too expensive). I plan on improving this in a future PR, but for now ResourceManager is mostly a 1:1 port of the leftover MeshletGpuScene bits. - Material draw passes have been renamed to the more accurate material shade pass, as well as some other misc renaming (in the future, these will be compute shaders even, and not actual draw calls) --- ## Migration Guide - TBD (ask me at the end of the release for meshlet changes as a whole) --------- Co-authored-by: vero <email@atlasdostal.com>
2024-08-26 17:54:34 +00:00
material_pipeline_prepare::{
MeshletViewMaterialsDeferredGBufferPrepass, MeshletViewMaterialsMainOpaquePass,
MeshletViewMaterialsPrepass,
},
Meshlet software raster + start of cleanup (#14623) # Objective - Faster meshlet rasterization path for small triangles - Avoid having to allocate and write out a triangle buffer - Refactor gpu_scene.rs ## Solution - Replace the 32bit visbuffer texture with a 64bit visbuffer buffer, where the left 32 bits encode depth, and the right 32 bits encode the existing cluster + triangle IDs. Can't use 64bit textures, wgpu/naga doesn't support atomic ops on textures yet. - Instead of writing out a buffer of packed cluster + triangle IDs (per triangle) to raster, the culling pass now writes out a buffer of just cluster IDs (per cluster, so less memory allocated, cheaper to write out). - Clusters for software raster are allocated from the left side - Clusters for hardware raster are allocated in the same buffer, from the right side - The buffer size is fixed at MeshletPlugin build time, and should be set to a reasonable value for your scene (no warning on overflow, and no good way to determine what value you need outside of renderdoc - I plan to fix this in a future PR adding a meshlet stats overlay) - Currently I don't have a heuristic for software vs hardware raster selection for each cluster. The existing code is just a placeholder. I need to profile on a release scene and come up with a heuristic, probably in a future PR. - The culling shader is getting pretty hard to follow at this point, but I don't want to spend time improving it as the entire shader/pass is getting rewritten/replaced in the near future. - Software raster is a compute workgroup per-cluster. Each workgroup loads and transforms the <=64 vertices of the cluster, and then rasterizes the <=64 triangles of the cluster. - Two variants are implemented: Scanline for clusters with any larger triangles (still smaller than hardware is good at), and brute-force for very very tiny triangles - Once the shader determines that a pixel should be filled in, it does an atomicMax() on the visbuffer to store the results, copying how Nanite works - On devices with a low max workgroups per dispatch limit, an extra compute pass is inserted before software raster to convert from a 1d to 2d dispatch (I don't think 3d would ever be necessary). - I haven't implemented the top-left rule or subpixel precision yet, I'm leaving that for a future PR since I get usable results without it for now - Resources used: https://kristoffer-dyrkorn.github.io/triangle-rasterizer and chapters 6-8 of https://fgiesen.wordpress.com/2013/02/17/optimizing-sw-occlusion-culling-index - Hardware raster now spawns 64*3 vertex invocations per meshlet, instead of the actual meshlet vertex count. Extra invocations just early-exit. - While this is slower than the existing system, hardware draws should be rare now that software raster is usable, and it saves a ton of memory using the unified cluster ID buffer. This would be fixed if wgpu had support for mesh shaders. - Instead of writing to a color+depth attachment, the hardware raster pass also does the same atomic visbuffer writes that software raster uses. - We have to bind a dummy render target anyways, as wgpu doesn't currently support render passes without any attachments - Material IDs are no longer written out during the main rasterization passes. - If we had async compute queues, we could overlap the software and hardware raster passes. - New material and depth resolve passes run at the end of the visbuffer node, and write out view depth and material ID depth textures ### Misc changes - Fixed cluster culling importing, but never actually using the previous view uniforms when doing occlusion culling - Fixed incorrectly adding the LOD error twice when building the meshlet mesh - Splitup gpu_scene module into meshlet_mesh_manager, instance_manager, and resource_manager - resource_manager is still too complex and inefficient (extract and prepare are way too expensive). I plan on improving this in a future PR, but for now ResourceManager is mostly a 1:1 port of the leftover MeshletGpuScene bits. - Material draw passes have been renamed to the more accurate material shade pass, as well as some other misc renaming (in the future, these will be compute shaders even, and not actual draw calls) --- ## Migration Guide - TBD (ask me at the end of the release for meshlet changes as a whole) --------- Co-authored-by: vero <email@atlasdostal.com>
2024-08-26 17:54:34 +00:00
resource_manager::{MeshletViewBindGroups, MeshletViewResources},
InstanceManager,
};
use crate::{
MeshViewBindGroup, PrepassViewBindGroup, ViewEnvironmentMapUniformOffset, ViewFogUniformOffset,
ViewLightProbesUniformOffset, ViewLightsUniformOffset, ViewScreenSpaceReflectionsUniformOffset,
};
use bevy_core_pipeline::prepass::{
MotionVectorPrepass, PreviousViewUniformOffset, ViewPrepassTextures,
};
use bevy_ecs::{
query::{Has, QueryItem},
world::World,
};
use bevy_render::{
camera::ExtractedCamera,
render_graph::{NodeRunError, RenderGraphContext, ViewNode},
render_resource::{
LoadOp, Operations, PipelineCache, RenderPassDepthStencilAttachment, RenderPassDescriptor,
StoreOp,
},
renderer::RenderContext,
view::{ViewTarget, ViewUniformOffset},
};
/// Fullscreen shading pass based on the visibility buffer generated from rasterizing meshlets.
#[derive(Default)]
pub struct MeshletMainOpaquePass3dNode;
impl ViewNode for MeshletMainOpaquePass3dNode {
type ViewQuery = (
&'static ExtractedCamera,
&'static ViewTarget,
&'static MeshViewBindGroup,
&'static ViewUniformOffset,
&'static ViewLightsUniformOffset,
&'static ViewFogUniformOffset,
&'static ViewLightProbesUniformOffset,
Implement opt-in sharp screen-space reflections for the deferred renderer, with improved raymarching code. (#13418) This commit, a revamp of #12959, implements screen-space reflections (SSR), which approximate real-time reflections based on raymarching through the depth buffer and copying samples from the final rendered frame. This patch is a relatively minimal implementation of SSR, so as to provide a flexible base on which to customize and build in the future. However, it's based on the production-quality [raymarching code by Tomasz Stachowiak](https://gist.github.com/h3r2tic/9c8356bdaefbe80b1a22ae0aaee192db). For a general basic overview of screen-space reflections, see [1](https://lettier.github.io/3d-game-shaders-for-beginners/screen-space-reflection.html). The raymarching shader uses the basic algorithm of tracing forward in large steps, refining that trace in smaller increments via binary search, and then using the secant method. No temporal filtering or roughness blurring, is performed at all; for this reason, SSR currently only operates on very shiny surfaces. No acceleration via the hierarchical Z-buffer is implemented (though note that https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/pull/12899 will add the infrastructure for this). Reflections are traced at full resolution, which is often considered slow. All of these improvements and more can be follow-ups. SSR is built on top of the deferred renderer and is currently only supported in that mode. Forward screen-space reflections are possible albeit uncommon (though e.g. *Doom Eternal* uses them); however, they require tracing from the previous frame, which would add complexity. This patch leaves the door open to implementing SSR in the forward rendering path but doesn't itself have such an implementation. Screen-space reflections aren't supported in WebGL 2, because they require sampling from the depth buffer, which Naga can't do because of a bug (`sampler2DShadow` is incorrectly generated instead of `sampler2D`; this is the same reason why depth of field is disabled on that platform). To add screen-space reflections to a camera, use the `ScreenSpaceReflectionsBundle` bundle or the `ScreenSpaceReflectionsSettings` component. In addition to `ScreenSpaceReflectionsSettings`, `DepthPrepass` and `DeferredPrepass` must also be present for the reflections to show up. The `ScreenSpaceReflectionsSettings` component contains several settings that artists can tweak, and also comes with sensible defaults. A new example, `ssr`, has been added. It's loosely based on the [three.js ocean sample](https://threejs.org/examples/webgl_shaders_ocean.html), but all the assets are original. Note that the three.js demo has no screen-space reflections and instead renders a mirror world. In contrast to #12959, this demo tests not only a cube but also a more complex model (the flight helmet). ## Changelog ### Added * Screen-space reflections can be enabled for very smooth surfaces by adding the `ScreenSpaceReflections` component to a camera. Deferred rendering must be enabled for the reflections to appear. ![Screenshot 2024-05-18 143555](https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/assets/157897/b8675b39-8a89-433e-a34e-1b9ee1233267) ![Screenshot 2024-05-18 143606](https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/assets/157897/cc9e1cd0-9951-464a-9a08-e589210e5606)
2024-05-27 13:43:40 +00:00
&'static ViewScreenSpaceReflectionsUniformOffset,
&'static ViewEnvironmentMapUniformOffset,
&'static MeshletViewMaterialsMainOpaquePass,
&'static MeshletViewBindGroups,
&'static MeshletViewResources,
);
fn run(
&self,
_graph: &mut RenderGraphContext,
render_context: &mut RenderContext,
(
camera,
target,
mesh_view_bind_group,
view_uniform_offset,
view_lights_offset,
view_fog_offset,
view_light_probes_offset,
Implement opt-in sharp screen-space reflections for the deferred renderer, with improved raymarching code. (#13418) This commit, a revamp of #12959, implements screen-space reflections (SSR), which approximate real-time reflections based on raymarching through the depth buffer and copying samples from the final rendered frame. This patch is a relatively minimal implementation of SSR, so as to provide a flexible base on which to customize and build in the future. However, it's based on the production-quality [raymarching code by Tomasz Stachowiak](https://gist.github.com/h3r2tic/9c8356bdaefbe80b1a22ae0aaee192db). For a general basic overview of screen-space reflections, see [1](https://lettier.github.io/3d-game-shaders-for-beginners/screen-space-reflection.html). The raymarching shader uses the basic algorithm of tracing forward in large steps, refining that trace in smaller increments via binary search, and then using the secant method. No temporal filtering or roughness blurring, is performed at all; for this reason, SSR currently only operates on very shiny surfaces. No acceleration via the hierarchical Z-buffer is implemented (though note that https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/pull/12899 will add the infrastructure for this). Reflections are traced at full resolution, which is often considered slow. All of these improvements and more can be follow-ups. SSR is built on top of the deferred renderer and is currently only supported in that mode. Forward screen-space reflections are possible albeit uncommon (though e.g. *Doom Eternal* uses them); however, they require tracing from the previous frame, which would add complexity. This patch leaves the door open to implementing SSR in the forward rendering path but doesn't itself have such an implementation. Screen-space reflections aren't supported in WebGL 2, because they require sampling from the depth buffer, which Naga can't do because of a bug (`sampler2DShadow` is incorrectly generated instead of `sampler2D`; this is the same reason why depth of field is disabled on that platform). To add screen-space reflections to a camera, use the `ScreenSpaceReflectionsBundle` bundle or the `ScreenSpaceReflectionsSettings` component. In addition to `ScreenSpaceReflectionsSettings`, `DepthPrepass` and `DeferredPrepass` must also be present for the reflections to show up. The `ScreenSpaceReflectionsSettings` component contains several settings that artists can tweak, and also comes with sensible defaults. A new example, `ssr`, has been added. It's loosely based on the [three.js ocean sample](https://threejs.org/examples/webgl_shaders_ocean.html), but all the assets are original. Note that the three.js demo has no screen-space reflections and instead renders a mirror world. In contrast to #12959, this demo tests not only a cube but also a more complex model (the flight helmet). ## Changelog ### Added * Screen-space reflections can be enabled for very smooth surfaces by adding the `ScreenSpaceReflections` component to a camera. Deferred rendering must be enabled for the reflections to appear. ![Screenshot 2024-05-18 143555](https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/assets/157897/b8675b39-8a89-433e-a34e-1b9ee1233267) ![Screenshot 2024-05-18 143606](https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/assets/157897/cc9e1cd0-9951-464a-9a08-e589210e5606)
2024-05-27 13:43:40 +00:00
view_ssr_offset,
view_environment_map_offset,
meshlet_view_materials,
meshlet_view_bind_groups,
meshlet_view_resources,
): QueryItem<Self::ViewQuery>,
world: &World,
) -> Result<(), NodeRunError> {
if meshlet_view_materials.is_empty() {
return Ok(());
}
let (
Meshlet software raster + start of cleanup (#14623) # Objective - Faster meshlet rasterization path for small triangles - Avoid having to allocate and write out a triangle buffer - Refactor gpu_scene.rs ## Solution - Replace the 32bit visbuffer texture with a 64bit visbuffer buffer, where the left 32 bits encode depth, and the right 32 bits encode the existing cluster + triangle IDs. Can't use 64bit textures, wgpu/naga doesn't support atomic ops on textures yet. - Instead of writing out a buffer of packed cluster + triangle IDs (per triangle) to raster, the culling pass now writes out a buffer of just cluster IDs (per cluster, so less memory allocated, cheaper to write out). - Clusters for software raster are allocated from the left side - Clusters for hardware raster are allocated in the same buffer, from the right side - The buffer size is fixed at MeshletPlugin build time, and should be set to a reasonable value for your scene (no warning on overflow, and no good way to determine what value you need outside of renderdoc - I plan to fix this in a future PR adding a meshlet stats overlay) - Currently I don't have a heuristic for software vs hardware raster selection for each cluster. The existing code is just a placeholder. I need to profile on a release scene and come up with a heuristic, probably in a future PR. - The culling shader is getting pretty hard to follow at this point, but I don't want to spend time improving it as the entire shader/pass is getting rewritten/replaced in the near future. - Software raster is a compute workgroup per-cluster. Each workgroup loads and transforms the <=64 vertices of the cluster, and then rasterizes the <=64 triangles of the cluster. - Two variants are implemented: Scanline for clusters with any larger triangles (still smaller than hardware is good at), and brute-force for very very tiny triangles - Once the shader determines that a pixel should be filled in, it does an atomicMax() on the visbuffer to store the results, copying how Nanite works - On devices with a low max workgroups per dispatch limit, an extra compute pass is inserted before software raster to convert from a 1d to 2d dispatch (I don't think 3d would ever be necessary). - I haven't implemented the top-left rule or subpixel precision yet, I'm leaving that for a future PR since I get usable results without it for now - Resources used: https://kristoffer-dyrkorn.github.io/triangle-rasterizer and chapters 6-8 of https://fgiesen.wordpress.com/2013/02/17/optimizing-sw-occlusion-culling-index - Hardware raster now spawns 64*3 vertex invocations per meshlet, instead of the actual meshlet vertex count. Extra invocations just early-exit. - While this is slower than the existing system, hardware draws should be rare now that software raster is usable, and it saves a ton of memory using the unified cluster ID buffer. This would be fixed if wgpu had support for mesh shaders. - Instead of writing to a color+depth attachment, the hardware raster pass also does the same atomic visbuffer writes that software raster uses. - We have to bind a dummy render target anyways, as wgpu doesn't currently support render passes without any attachments - Material IDs are no longer written out during the main rasterization passes. - If we had async compute queues, we could overlap the software and hardware raster passes. - New material and depth resolve passes run at the end of the visbuffer node, and write out view depth and material ID depth textures ### Misc changes - Fixed cluster culling importing, but never actually using the previous view uniforms when doing occlusion culling - Fixed incorrectly adding the LOD error twice when building the meshlet mesh - Splitup gpu_scene module into meshlet_mesh_manager, instance_manager, and resource_manager - resource_manager is still too complex and inefficient (extract and prepare are way too expensive). I plan on improving this in a future PR, but for now ResourceManager is mostly a 1:1 port of the leftover MeshletGpuScene bits. - Material draw passes have been renamed to the more accurate material shade pass, as well as some other misc renaming (in the future, these will be compute shaders even, and not actual draw calls) --- ## Migration Guide - TBD (ask me at the end of the release for meshlet changes as a whole) --------- Co-authored-by: vero <email@atlasdostal.com>
2024-08-26 17:54:34 +00:00
Some(instance_manager),
Some(pipeline_cache),
Some(meshlet_material_depth),
Meshlet software raster + start of cleanup (#14623) # Objective - Faster meshlet rasterization path for small triangles - Avoid having to allocate and write out a triangle buffer - Refactor gpu_scene.rs ## Solution - Replace the 32bit visbuffer texture with a 64bit visbuffer buffer, where the left 32 bits encode depth, and the right 32 bits encode the existing cluster + triangle IDs. Can't use 64bit textures, wgpu/naga doesn't support atomic ops on textures yet. - Instead of writing out a buffer of packed cluster + triangle IDs (per triangle) to raster, the culling pass now writes out a buffer of just cluster IDs (per cluster, so less memory allocated, cheaper to write out). - Clusters for software raster are allocated from the left side - Clusters for hardware raster are allocated in the same buffer, from the right side - The buffer size is fixed at MeshletPlugin build time, and should be set to a reasonable value for your scene (no warning on overflow, and no good way to determine what value you need outside of renderdoc - I plan to fix this in a future PR adding a meshlet stats overlay) - Currently I don't have a heuristic for software vs hardware raster selection for each cluster. The existing code is just a placeholder. I need to profile on a release scene and come up with a heuristic, probably in a future PR. - The culling shader is getting pretty hard to follow at this point, but I don't want to spend time improving it as the entire shader/pass is getting rewritten/replaced in the near future. - Software raster is a compute workgroup per-cluster. Each workgroup loads and transforms the <=64 vertices of the cluster, and then rasterizes the <=64 triangles of the cluster. - Two variants are implemented: Scanline for clusters with any larger triangles (still smaller than hardware is good at), and brute-force for very very tiny triangles - Once the shader determines that a pixel should be filled in, it does an atomicMax() on the visbuffer to store the results, copying how Nanite works - On devices with a low max workgroups per dispatch limit, an extra compute pass is inserted before software raster to convert from a 1d to 2d dispatch (I don't think 3d would ever be necessary). - I haven't implemented the top-left rule or subpixel precision yet, I'm leaving that for a future PR since I get usable results without it for now - Resources used: https://kristoffer-dyrkorn.github.io/triangle-rasterizer and chapters 6-8 of https://fgiesen.wordpress.com/2013/02/17/optimizing-sw-occlusion-culling-index - Hardware raster now spawns 64*3 vertex invocations per meshlet, instead of the actual meshlet vertex count. Extra invocations just early-exit. - While this is slower than the existing system, hardware draws should be rare now that software raster is usable, and it saves a ton of memory using the unified cluster ID buffer. This would be fixed if wgpu had support for mesh shaders. - Instead of writing to a color+depth attachment, the hardware raster pass also does the same atomic visbuffer writes that software raster uses. - We have to bind a dummy render target anyways, as wgpu doesn't currently support render passes without any attachments - Material IDs are no longer written out during the main rasterization passes. - If we had async compute queues, we could overlap the software and hardware raster passes. - New material and depth resolve passes run at the end of the visbuffer node, and write out view depth and material ID depth textures ### Misc changes - Fixed cluster culling importing, but never actually using the previous view uniforms when doing occlusion culling - Fixed incorrectly adding the LOD error twice when building the meshlet mesh - Splitup gpu_scene module into meshlet_mesh_manager, instance_manager, and resource_manager - resource_manager is still too complex and inefficient (extract and prepare are way too expensive). I plan on improving this in a future PR, but for now ResourceManager is mostly a 1:1 port of the leftover MeshletGpuScene bits. - Material draw passes have been renamed to the more accurate material shade pass, as well as some other misc renaming (in the future, these will be compute shaders even, and not actual draw calls) --- ## Migration Guide - TBD (ask me at the end of the release for meshlet changes as a whole) --------- Co-authored-by: vero <email@atlasdostal.com>
2024-08-26 17:54:34 +00:00
Some(meshlet_material_shade_bind_group),
) = (
Meshlet software raster + start of cleanup (#14623) # Objective - Faster meshlet rasterization path for small triangles - Avoid having to allocate and write out a triangle buffer - Refactor gpu_scene.rs ## Solution - Replace the 32bit visbuffer texture with a 64bit visbuffer buffer, where the left 32 bits encode depth, and the right 32 bits encode the existing cluster + triangle IDs. Can't use 64bit textures, wgpu/naga doesn't support atomic ops on textures yet. - Instead of writing out a buffer of packed cluster + triangle IDs (per triangle) to raster, the culling pass now writes out a buffer of just cluster IDs (per cluster, so less memory allocated, cheaper to write out). - Clusters for software raster are allocated from the left side - Clusters for hardware raster are allocated in the same buffer, from the right side - The buffer size is fixed at MeshletPlugin build time, and should be set to a reasonable value for your scene (no warning on overflow, and no good way to determine what value you need outside of renderdoc - I plan to fix this in a future PR adding a meshlet stats overlay) - Currently I don't have a heuristic for software vs hardware raster selection for each cluster. The existing code is just a placeholder. I need to profile on a release scene and come up with a heuristic, probably in a future PR. - The culling shader is getting pretty hard to follow at this point, but I don't want to spend time improving it as the entire shader/pass is getting rewritten/replaced in the near future. - Software raster is a compute workgroup per-cluster. Each workgroup loads and transforms the <=64 vertices of the cluster, and then rasterizes the <=64 triangles of the cluster. - Two variants are implemented: Scanline for clusters with any larger triangles (still smaller than hardware is good at), and brute-force for very very tiny triangles - Once the shader determines that a pixel should be filled in, it does an atomicMax() on the visbuffer to store the results, copying how Nanite works - On devices with a low max workgroups per dispatch limit, an extra compute pass is inserted before software raster to convert from a 1d to 2d dispatch (I don't think 3d would ever be necessary). - I haven't implemented the top-left rule or subpixel precision yet, I'm leaving that for a future PR since I get usable results without it for now - Resources used: https://kristoffer-dyrkorn.github.io/triangle-rasterizer and chapters 6-8 of https://fgiesen.wordpress.com/2013/02/17/optimizing-sw-occlusion-culling-index - Hardware raster now spawns 64*3 vertex invocations per meshlet, instead of the actual meshlet vertex count. Extra invocations just early-exit. - While this is slower than the existing system, hardware draws should be rare now that software raster is usable, and it saves a ton of memory using the unified cluster ID buffer. This would be fixed if wgpu had support for mesh shaders. - Instead of writing to a color+depth attachment, the hardware raster pass also does the same atomic visbuffer writes that software raster uses. - We have to bind a dummy render target anyways, as wgpu doesn't currently support render passes without any attachments - Material IDs are no longer written out during the main rasterization passes. - If we had async compute queues, we could overlap the software and hardware raster passes. - New material and depth resolve passes run at the end of the visbuffer node, and write out view depth and material ID depth textures ### Misc changes - Fixed cluster culling importing, but never actually using the previous view uniforms when doing occlusion culling - Fixed incorrectly adding the LOD error twice when building the meshlet mesh - Splitup gpu_scene module into meshlet_mesh_manager, instance_manager, and resource_manager - resource_manager is still too complex and inefficient (extract and prepare are way too expensive). I plan on improving this in a future PR, but for now ResourceManager is mostly a 1:1 port of the leftover MeshletGpuScene bits. - Material draw passes have been renamed to the more accurate material shade pass, as well as some other misc renaming (in the future, these will be compute shaders even, and not actual draw calls) --- ## Migration Guide - TBD (ask me at the end of the release for meshlet changes as a whole) --------- Co-authored-by: vero <email@atlasdostal.com>
2024-08-26 17:54:34 +00:00
world.get_resource::<InstanceManager>(),
world.get_resource::<PipelineCache>(),
meshlet_view_resources.material_depth.as_ref(),
Meshlet software raster + start of cleanup (#14623) # Objective - Faster meshlet rasterization path for small triangles - Avoid having to allocate and write out a triangle buffer - Refactor gpu_scene.rs ## Solution - Replace the 32bit visbuffer texture with a 64bit visbuffer buffer, where the left 32 bits encode depth, and the right 32 bits encode the existing cluster + triangle IDs. Can't use 64bit textures, wgpu/naga doesn't support atomic ops on textures yet. - Instead of writing out a buffer of packed cluster + triangle IDs (per triangle) to raster, the culling pass now writes out a buffer of just cluster IDs (per cluster, so less memory allocated, cheaper to write out). - Clusters for software raster are allocated from the left side - Clusters for hardware raster are allocated in the same buffer, from the right side - The buffer size is fixed at MeshletPlugin build time, and should be set to a reasonable value for your scene (no warning on overflow, and no good way to determine what value you need outside of renderdoc - I plan to fix this in a future PR adding a meshlet stats overlay) - Currently I don't have a heuristic for software vs hardware raster selection for each cluster. The existing code is just a placeholder. I need to profile on a release scene and come up with a heuristic, probably in a future PR. - The culling shader is getting pretty hard to follow at this point, but I don't want to spend time improving it as the entire shader/pass is getting rewritten/replaced in the near future. - Software raster is a compute workgroup per-cluster. Each workgroup loads and transforms the <=64 vertices of the cluster, and then rasterizes the <=64 triangles of the cluster. - Two variants are implemented: Scanline for clusters with any larger triangles (still smaller than hardware is good at), and brute-force for very very tiny triangles - Once the shader determines that a pixel should be filled in, it does an atomicMax() on the visbuffer to store the results, copying how Nanite works - On devices with a low max workgroups per dispatch limit, an extra compute pass is inserted before software raster to convert from a 1d to 2d dispatch (I don't think 3d would ever be necessary). - I haven't implemented the top-left rule or subpixel precision yet, I'm leaving that for a future PR since I get usable results without it for now - Resources used: https://kristoffer-dyrkorn.github.io/triangle-rasterizer and chapters 6-8 of https://fgiesen.wordpress.com/2013/02/17/optimizing-sw-occlusion-culling-index - Hardware raster now spawns 64*3 vertex invocations per meshlet, instead of the actual meshlet vertex count. Extra invocations just early-exit. - While this is slower than the existing system, hardware draws should be rare now that software raster is usable, and it saves a ton of memory using the unified cluster ID buffer. This would be fixed if wgpu had support for mesh shaders. - Instead of writing to a color+depth attachment, the hardware raster pass also does the same atomic visbuffer writes that software raster uses. - We have to bind a dummy render target anyways, as wgpu doesn't currently support render passes without any attachments - Material IDs are no longer written out during the main rasterization passes. - If we had async compute queues, we could overlap the software and hardware raster passes. - New material and depth resolve passes run at the end of the visbuffer node, and write out view depth and material ID depth textures ### Misc changes - Fixed cluster culling importing, but never actually using the previous view uniforms when doing occlusion culling - Fixed incorrectly adding the LOD error twice when building the meshlet mesh - Splitup gpu_scene module into meshlet_mesh_manager, instance_manager, and resource_manager - resource_manager is still too complex and inefficient (extract and prepare are way too expensive). I plan on improving this in a future PR, but for now ResourceManager is mostly a 1:1 port of the leftover MeshletGpuScene bits. - Material draw passes have been renamed to the more accurate material shade pass, as well as some other misc renaming (in the future, these will be compute shaders even, and not actual draw calls) --- ## Migration Guide - TBD (ask me at the end of the release for meshlet changes as a whole) --------- Co-authored-by: vero <email@atlasdostal.com>
2024-08-26 17:54:34 +00:00
meshlet_view_bind_groups.material_shade.as_ref(),
)
else {
return Ok(());
};
let mut render_pass = render_context.begin_tracked_render_pass(RenderPassDescriptor {
label: Some("meshlet_main_opaque_pass_3d"),
color_attachments: &[Some(target.get_color_attachment())],
depth_stencil_attachment: Some(RenderPassDepthStencilAttachment {
view: &meshlet_material_depth.default_view,
depth_ops: Some(Operations {
load: LoadOp::Load,
store: StoreOp::Store,
}),
stencil_ops: None,
}),
timestamp_writes: None,
occlusion_query_set: None,
});
if let Some(viewport) = camera.viewport.as_ref() {
render_pass.set_camera_viewport(viewport);
}
render_pass.set_bind_group(
0,
&mesh_view_bind_group.value,
&[
view_uniform_offset.offset,
view_lights_offset.offset,
view_fog_offset.offset,
**view_light_probes_offset,
Implement opt-in sharp screen-space reflections for the deferred renderer, with improved raymarching code. (#13418) This commit, a revamp of #12959, implements screen-space reflections (SSR), which approximate real-time reflections based on raymarching through the depth buffer and copying samples from the final rendered frame. This patch is a relatively minimal implementation of SSR, so as to provide a flexible base on which to customize and build in the future. However, it's based on the production-quality [raymarching code by Tomasz Stachowiak](https://gist.github.com/h3r2tic/9c8356bdaefbe80b1a22ae0aaee192db). For a general basic overview of screen-space reflections, see [1](https://lettier.github.io/3d-game-shaders-for-beginners/screen-space-reflection.html). The raymarching shader uses the basic algorithm of tracing forward in large steps, refining that trace in smaller increments via binary search, and then using the secant method. No temporal filtering or roughness blurring, is performed at all; for this reason, SSR currently only operates on very shiny surfaces. No acceleration via the hierarchical Z-buffer is implemented (though note that https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/pull/12899 will add the infrastructure for this). Reflections are traced at full resolution, which is often considered slow. All of these improvements and more can be follow-ups. SSR is built on top of the deferred renderer and is currently only supported in that mode. Forward screen-space reflections are possible albeit uncommon (though e.g. *Doom Eternal* uses them); however, they require tracing from the previous frame, which would add complexity. This patch leaves the door open to implementing SSR in the forward rendering path but doesn't itself have such an implementation. Screen-space reflections aren't supported in WebGL 2, because they require sampling from the depth buffer, which Naga can't do because of a bug (`sampler2DShadow` is incorrectly generated instead of `sampler2D`; this is the same reason why depth of field is disabled on that platform). To add screen-space reflections to a camera, use the `ScreenSpaceReflectionsBundle` bundle or the `ScreenSpaceReflectionsSettings` component. In addition to `ScreenSpaceReflectionsSettings`, `DepthPrepass` and `DeferredPrepass` must also be present for the reflections to show up. The `ScreenSpaceReflectionsSettings` component contains several settings that artists can tweak, and also comes with sensible defaults. A new example, `ssr`, has been added. It's loosely based on the [three.js ocean sample](https://threejs.org/examples/webgl_shaders_ocean.html), but all the assets are original. Note that the three.js demo has no screen-space reflections and instead renders a mirror world. In contrast to #12959, this demo tests not only a cube but also a more complex model (the flight helmet). ## Changelog ### Added * Screen-space reflections can be enabled for very smooth surfaces by adding the `ScreenSpaceReflections` component to a camera. Deferred rendering must be enabled for the reflections to appear. ![Screenshot 2024-05-18 143555](https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/assets/157897/b8675b39-8a89-433e-a34e-1b9ee1233267) ![Screenshot 2024-05-18 143606](https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/assets/157897/cc9e1cd0-9951-464a-9a08-e589210e5606)
2024-05-27 13:43:40 +00:00
**view_ssr_offset,
**view_environment_map_offset,
],
);
Meshlet software raster + start of cleanup (#14623) # Objective - Faster meshlet rasterization path for small triangles - Avoid having to allocate and write out a triangle buffer - Refactor gpu_scene.rs ## Solution - Replace the 32bit visbuffer texture with a 64bit visbuffer buffer, where the left 32 bits encode depth, and the right 32 bits encode the existing cluster + triangle IDs. Can't use 64bit textures, wgpu/naga doesn't support atomic ops on textures yet. - Instead of writing out a buffer of packed cluster + triangle IDs (per triangle) to raster, the culling pass now writes out a buffer of just cluster IDs (per cluster, so less memory allocated, cheaper to write out). - Clusters for software raster are allocated from the left side - Clusters for hardware raster are allocated in the same buffer, from the right side - The buffer size is fixed at MeshletPlugin build time, and should be set to a reasonable value for your scene (no warning on overflow, and no good way to determine what value you need outside of renderdoc - I plan to fix this in a future PR adding a meshlet stats overlay) - Currently I don't have a heuristic for software vs hardware raster selection for each cluster. The existing code is just a placeholder. I need to profile on a release scene and come up with a heuristic, probably in a future PR. - The culling shader is getting pretty hard to follow at this point, but I don't want to spend time improving it as the entire shader/pass is getting rewritten/replaced in the near future. - Software raster is a compute workgroup per-cluster. Each workgroup loads and transforms the <=64 vertices of the cluster, and then rasterizes the <=64 triangles of the cluster. - Two variants are implemented: Scanline for clusters with any larger triangles (still smaller than hardware is good at), and brute-force for very very tiny triangles - Once the shader determines that a pixel should be filled in, it does an atomicMax() on the visbuffer to store the results, copying how Nanite works - On devices with a low max workgroups per dispatch limit, an extra compute pass is inserted before software raster to convert from a 1d to 2d dispatch (I don't think 3d would ever be necessary). - I haven't implemented the top-left rule or subpixel precision yet, I'm leaving that for a future PR since I get usable results without it for now - Resources used: https://kristoffer-dyrkorn.github.io/triangle-rasterizer and chapters 6-8 of https://fgiesen.wordpress.com/2013/02/17/optimizing-sw-occlusion-culling-index - Hardware raster now spawns 64*3 vertex invocations per meshlet, instead of the actual meshlet vertex count. Extra invocations just early-exit. - While this is slower than the existing system, hardware draws should be rare now that software raster is usable, and it saves a ton of memory using the unified cluster ID buffer. This would be fixed if wgpu had support for mesh shaders. - Instead of writing to a color+depth attachment, the hardware raster pass also does the same atomic visbuffer writes that software raster uses. - We have to bind a dummy render target anyways, as wgpu doesn't currently support render passes without any attachments - Material IDs are no longer written out during the main rasterization passes. - If we had async compute queues, we could overlap the software and hardware raster passes. - New material and depth resolve passes run at the end of the visbuffer node, and write out view depth and material ID depth textures ### Misc changes - Fixed cluster culling importing, but never actually using the previous view uniforms when doing occlusion culling - Fixed incorrectly adding the LOD error twice when building the meshlet mesh - Splitup gpu_scene module into meshlet_mesh_manager, instance_manager, and resource_manager - resource_manager is still too complex and inefficient (extract and prepare are way too expensive). I plan on improving this in a future PR, but for now ResourceManager is mostly a 1:1 port of the leftover MeshletGpuScene bits. - Material draw passes have been renamed to the more accurate material shade pass, as well as some other misc renaming (in the future, these will be compute shaders even, and not actual draw calls) --- ## Migration Guide - TBD (ask me at the end of the release for meshlet changes as a whole) --------- Co-authored-by: vero <email@atlasdostal.com>
2024-08-26 17:54:34 +00:00
render_pass.set_bind_group(1, meshlet_material_shade_bind_group, &[]);
// 1 fullscreen triangle draw per material
for (material_id, material_pipeline_id, material_bind_group) in
meshlet_view_materials.iter()
{
Meshlet software raster + start of cleanup (#14623) # Objective - Faster meshlet rasterization path for small triangles - Avoid having to allocate and write out a triangle buffer - Refactor gpu_scene.rs ## Solution - Replace the 32bit visbuffer texture with a 64bit visbuffer buffer, where the left 32 bits encode depth, and the right 32 bits encode the existing cluster + triangle IDs. Can't use 64bit textures, wgpu/naga doesn't support atomic ops on textures yet. - Instead of writing out a buffer of packed cluster + triangle IDs (per triangle) to raster, the culling pass now writes out a buffer of just cluster IDs (per cluster, so less memory allocated, cheaper to write out). - Clusters for software raster are allocated from the left side - Clusters for hardware raster are allocated in the same buffer, from the right side - The buffer size is fixed at MeshletPlugin build time, and should be set to a reasonable value for your scene (no warning on overflow, and no good way to determine what value you need outside of renderdoc - I plan to fix this in a future PR adding a meshlet stats overlay) - Currently I don't have a heuristic for software vs hardware raster selection for each cluster. The existing code is just a placeholder. I need to profile on a release scene and come up with a heuristic, probably in a future PR. - The culling shader is getting pretty hard to follow at this point, but I don't want to spend time improving it as the entire shader/pass is getting rewritten/replaced in the near future. - Software raster is a compute workgroup per-cluster. Each workgroup loads and transforms the <=64 vertices of the cluster, and then rasterizes the <=64 triangles of the cluster. - Two variants are implemented: Scanline for clusters with any larger triangles (still smaller than hardware is good at), and brute-force for very very tiny triangles - Once the shader determines that a pixel should be filled in, it does an atomicMax() on the visbuffer to store the results, copying how Nanite works - On devices with a low max workgroups per dispatch limit, an extra compute pass is inserted before software raster to convert from a 1d to 2d dispatch (I don't think 3d would ever be necessary). - I haven't implemented the top-left rule or subpixel precision yet, I'm leaving that for a future PR since I get usable results without it for now - Resources used: https://kristoffer-dyrkorn.github.io/triangle-rasterizer and chapters 6-8 of https://fgiesen.wordpress.com/2013/02/17/optimizing-sw-occlusion-culling-index - Hardware raster now spawns 64*3 vertex invocations per meshlet, instead of the actual meshlet vertex count. Extra invocations just early-exit. - While this is slower than the existing system, hardware draws should be rare now that software raster is usable, and it saves a ton of memory using the unified cluster ID buffer. This would be fixed if wgpu had support for mesh shaders. - Instead of writing to a color+depth attachment, the hardware raster pass also does the same atomic visbuffer writes that software raster uses. - We have to bind a dummy render target anyways, as wgpu doesn't currently support render passes without any attachments - Material IDs are no longer written out during the main rasterization passes. - If we had async compute queues, we could overlap the software and hardware raster passes. - New material and depth resolve passes run at the end of the visbuffer node, and write out view depth and material ID depth textures ### Misc changes - Fixed cluster culling importing, but never actually using the previous view uniforms when doing occlusion culling - Fixed incorrectly adding the LOD error twice when building the meshlet mesh - Splitup gpu_scene module into meshlet_mesh_manager, instance_manager, and resource_manager - resource_manager is still too complex and inefficient (extract and prepare are way too expensive). I plan on improving this in a future PR, but for now ResourceManager is mostly a 1:1 port of the leftover MeshletGpuScene bits. - Material draw passes have been renamed to the more accurate material shade pass, as well as some other misc renaming (in the future, these will be compute shaders even, and not actual draw calls) --- ## Migration Guide - TBD (ask me at the end of the release for meshlet changes as a whole) --------- Co-authored-by: vero <email@atlasdostal.com>
2024-08-26 17:54:34 +00:00
if instance_manager.material_present_in_scene(material_id) {
if let Some(material_pipeline) =
pipeline_cache.get_render_pipeline(*material_pipeline_id)
{
let x = *material_id * 3;
render_pass.set_render_pipeline(material_pipeline);
render_pass.set_bind_group(2, material_bind_group, &[]);
render_pass.draw(x..(x + 3), 0..1);
}
}
}
Ok(())
}
}
/// Fullscreen pass to generate prepass textures based on the visibility buffer generated from rasterizing meshlets.
#[derive(Default)]
pub struct MeshletPrepassNode;
impl ViewNode for MeshletPrepassNode {
type ViewQuery = (
&'static ExtractedCamera,
&'static ViewPrepassTextures,
&'static ViewUniformOffset,
&'static PreviousViewUniformOffset,
Has<MotionVectorPrepass>,
&'static MeshletViewMaterialsPrepass,
&'static MeshletViewBindGroups,
&'static MeshletViewResources,
);
fn run(
&self,
_graph: &mut RenderGraphContext,
render_context: &mut RenderContext,
(
camera,
view_prepass_textures,
view_uniform_offset,
previous_view_uniform_offset,
view_has_motion_vector_prepass,
meshlet_view_materials,
meshlet_view_bind_groups,
meshlet_view_resources,
): QueryItem<Self::ViewQuery>,
world: &World,
) -> Result<(), NodeRunError> {
if meshlet_view_materials.is_empty() {
return Ok(());
}
let (
Some(prepass_view_bind_group),
Meshlet software raster + start of cleanup (#14623) # Objective - Faster meshlet rasterization path for small triangles - Avoid having to allocate and write out a triangle buffer - Refactor gpu_scene.rs ## Solution - Replace the 32bit visbuffer texture with a 64bit visbuffer buffer, where the left 32 bits encode depth, and the right 32 bits encode the existing cluster + triangle IDs. Can't use 64bit textures, wgpu/naga doesn't support atomic ops on textures yet. - Instead of writing out a buffer of packed cluster + triangle IDs (per triangle) to raster, the culling pass now writes out a buffer of just cluster IDs (per cluster, so less memory allocated, cheaper to write out). - Clusters for software raster are allocated from the left side - Clusters for hardware raster are allocated in the same buffer, from the right side - The buffer size is fixed at MeshletPlugin build time, and should be set to a reasonable value for your scene (no warning on overflow, and no good way to determine what value you need outside of renderdoc - I plan to fix this in a future PR adding a meshlet stats overlay) - Currently I don't have a heuristic for software vs hardware raster selection for each cluster. The existing code is just a placeholder. I need to profile on a release scene and come up with a heuristic, probably in a future PR. - The culling shader is getting pretty hard to follow at this point, but I don't want to spend time improving it as the entire shader/pass is getting rewritten/replaced in the near future. - Software raster is a compute workgroup per-cluster. Each workgroup loads and transforms the <=64 vertices of the cluster, and then rasterizes the <=64 triangles of the cluster. - Two variants are implemented: Scanline for clusters with any larger triangles (still smaller than hardware is good at), and brute-force for very very tiny triangles - Once the shader determines that a pixel should be filled in, it does an atomicMax() on the visbuffer to store the results, copying how Nanite works - On devices with a low max workgroups per dispatch limit, an extra compute pass is inserted before software raster to convert from a 1d to 2d dispatch (I don't think 3d would ever be necessary). - I haven't implemented the top-left rule or subpixel precision yet, I'm leaving that for a future PR since I get usable results without it for now - Resources used: https://kristoffer-dyrkorn.github.io/triangle-rasterizer and chapters 6-8 of https://fgiesen.wordpress.com/2013/02/17/optimizing-sw-occlusion-culling-index - Hardware raster now spawns 64*3 vertex invocations per meshlet, instead of the actual meshlet vertex count. Extra invocations just early-exit. - While this is slower than the existing system, hardware draws should be rare now that software raster is usable, and it saves a ton of memory using the unified cluster ID buffer. This would be fixed if wgpu had support for mesh shaders. - Instead of writing to a color+depth attachment, the hardware raster pass also does the same atomic visbuffer writes that software raster uses. - We have to bind a dummy render target anyways, as wgpu doesn't currently support render passes without any attachments - Material IDs are no longer written out during the main rasterization passes. - If we had async compute queues, we could overlap the software and hardware raster passes. - New material and depth resolve passes run at the end of the visbuffer node, and write out view depth and material ID depth textures ### Misc changes - Fixed cluster culling importing, but never actually using the previous view uniforms when doing occlusion culling - Fixed incorrectly adding the LOD error twice when building the meshlet mesh - Splitup gpu_scene module into meshlet_mesh_manager, instance_manager, and resource_manager - resource_manager is still too complex and inefficient (extract and prepare are way too expensive). I plan on improving this in a future PR, but for now ResourceManager is mostly a 1:1 port of the leftover MeshletGpuScene bits. - Material draw passes have been renamed to the more accurate material shade pass, as well as some other misc renaming (in the future, these will be compute shaders even, and not actual draw calls) --- ## Migration Guide - TBD (ask me at the end of the release for meshlet changes as a whole) --------- Co-authored-by: vero <email@atlasdostal.com>
2024-08-26 17:54:34 +00:00
Some(instance_manager),
Some(pipeline_cache),
Some(meshlet_material_depth),
Meshlet software raster + start of cleanup (#14623) # Objective - Faster meshlet rasterization path for small triangles - Avoid having to allocate and write out a triangle buffer - Refactor gpu_scene.rs ## Solution - Replace the 32bit visbuffer texture with a 64bit visbuffer buffer, where the left 32 bits encode depth, and the right 32 bits encode the existing cluster + triangle IDs. Can't use 64bit textures, wgpu/naga doesn't support atomic ops on textures yet. - Instead of writing out a buffer of packed cluster + triangle IDs (per triangle) to raster, the culling pass now writes out a buffer of just cluster IDs (per cluster, so less memory allocated, cheaper to write out). - Clusters for software raster are allocated from the left side - Clusters for hardware raster are allocated in the same buffer, from the right side - The buffer size is fixed at MeshletPlugin build time, and should be set to a reasonable value for your scene (no warning on overflow, and no good way to determine what value you need outside of renderdoc - I plan to fix this in a future PR adding a meshlet stats overlay) - Currently I don't have a heuristic for software vs hardware raster selection for each cluster. The existing code is just a placeholder. I need to profile on a release scene and come up with a heuristic, probably in a future PR. - The culling shader is getting pretty hard to follow at this point, but I don't want to spend time improving it as the entire shader/pass is getting rewritten/replaced in the near future. - Software raster is a compute workgroup per-cluster. Each workgroup loads and transforms the <=64 vertices of the cluster, and then rasterizes the <=64 triangles of the cluster. - Two variants are implemented: Scanline for clusters with any larger triangles (still smaller than hardware is good at), and brute-force for very very tiny triangles - Once the shader determines that a pixel should be filled in, it does an atomicMax() on the visbuffer to store the results, copying how Nanite works - On devices with a low max workgroups per dispatch limit, an extra compute pass is inserted before software raster to convert from a 1d to 2d dispatch (I don't think 3d would ever be necessary). - I haven't implemented the top-left rule or subpixel precision yet, I'm leaving that for a future PR since I get usable results without it for now - Resources used: https://kristoffer-dyrkorn.github.io/triangle-rasterizer and chapters 6-8 of https://fgiesen.wordpress.com/2013/02/17/optimizing-sw-occlusion-culling-index - Hardware raster now spawns 64*3 vertex invocations per meshlet, instead of the actual meshlet vertex count. Extra invocations just early-exit. - While this is slower than the existing system, hardware draws should be rare now that software raster is usable, and it saves a ton of memory using the unified cluster ID buffer. This would be fixed if wgpu had support for mesh shaders. - Instead of writing to a color+depth attachment, the hardware raster pass also does the same atomic visbuffer writes that software raster uses. - We have to bind a dummy render target anyways, as wgpu doesn't currently support render passes without any attachments - Material IDs are no longer written out during the main rasterization passes. - If we had async compute queues, we could overlap the software and hardware raster passes. - New material and depth resolve passes run at the end of the visbuffer node, and write out view depth and material ID depth textures ### Misc changes - Fixed cluster culling importing, but never actually using the previous view uniforms when doing occlusion culling - Fixed incorrectly adding the LOD error twice when building the meshlet mesh - Splitup gpu_scene module into meshlet_mesh_manager, instance_manager, and resource_manager - resource_manager is still too complex and inefficient (extract and prepare are way too expensive). I plan on improving this in a future PR, but for now ResourceManager is mostly a 1:1 port of the leftover MeshletGpuScene bits. - Material draw passes have been renamed to the more accurate material shade pass, as well as some other misc renaming (in the future, these will be compute shaders even, and not actual draw calls) --- ## Migration Guide - TBD (ask me at the end of the release for meshlet changes as a whole) --------- Co-authored-by: vero <email@atlasdostal.com>
2024-08-26 17:54:34 +00:00
Some(meshlet_material_shade_bind_group),
) = (
world.get_resource::<PrepassViewBindGroup>(),
Meshlet software raster + start of cleanup (#14623) # Objective - Faster meshlet rasterization path for small triangles - Avoid having to allocate and write out a triangle buffer - Refactor gpu_scene.rs ## Solution - Replace the 32bit visbuffer texture with a 64bit visbuffer buffer, where the left 32 bits encode depth, and the right 32 bits encode the existing cluster + triangle IDs. Can't use 64bit textures, wgpu/naga doesn't support atomic ops on textures yet. - Instead of writing out a buffer of packed cluster + triangle IDs (per triangle) to raster, the culling pass now writes out a buffer of just cluster IDs (per cluster, so less memory allocated, cheaper to write out). - Clusters for software raster are allocated from the left side - Clusters for hardware raster are allocated in the same buffer, from the right side - The buffer size is fixed at MeshletPlugin build time, and should be set to a reasonable value for your scene (no warning on overflow, and no good way to determine what value you need outside of renderdoc - I plan to fix this in a future PR adding a meshlet stats overlay) - Currently I don't have a heuristic for software vs hardware raster selection for each cluster. The existing code is just a placeholder. I need to profile on a release scene and come up with a heuristic, probably in a future PR. - The culling shader is getting pretty hard to follow at this point, but I don't want to spend time improving it as the entire shader/pass is getting rewritten/replaced in the near future. - Software raster is a compute workgroup per-cluster. Each workgroup loads and transforms the <=64 vertices of the cluster, and then rasterizes the <=64 triangles of the cluster. - Two variants are implemented: Scanline for clusters with any larger triangles (still smaller than hardware is good at), and brute-force for very very tiny triangles - Once the shader determines that a pixel should be filled in, it does an atomicMax() on the visbuffer to store the results, copying how Nanite works - On devices with a low max workgroups per dispatch limit, an extra compute pass is inserted before software raster to convert from a 1d to 2d dispatch (I don't think 3d would ever be necessary). - I haven't implemented the top-left rule or subpixel precision yet, I'm leaving that for a future PR since I get usable results without it for now - Resources used: https://kristoffer-dyrkorn.github.io/triangle-rasterizer and chapters 6-8 of https://fgiesen.wordpress.com/2013/02/17/optimizing-sw-occlusion-culling-index - Hardware raster now spawns 64*3 vertex invocations per meshlet, instead of the actual meshlet vertex count. Extra invocations just early-exit. - While this is slower than the existing system, hardware draws should be rare now that software raster is usable, and it saves a ton of memory using the unified cluster ID buffer. This would be fixed if wgpu had support for mesh shaders. - Instead of writing to a color+depth attachment, the hardware raster pass also does the same atomic visbuffer writes that software raster uses. - We have to bind a dummy render target anyways, as wgpu doesn't currently support render passes without any attachments - Material IDs are no longer written out during the main rasterization passes. - If we had async compute queues, we could overlap the software and hardware raster passes. - New material and depth resolve passes run at the end of the visbuffer node, and write out view depth and material ID depth textures ### Misc changes - Fixed cluster culling importing, but never actually using the previous view uniforms when doing occlusion culling - Fixed incorrectly adding the LOD error twice when building the meshlet mesh - Splitup gpu_scene module into meshlet_mesh_manager, instance_manager, and resource_manager - resource_manager is still too complex and inefficient (extract and prepare are way too expensive). I plan on improving this in a future PR, but for now ResourceManager is mostly a 1:1 port of the leftover MeshletGpuScene bits. - Material draw passes have been renamed to the more accurate material shade pass, as well as some other misc renaming (in the future, these will be compute shaders even, and not actual draw calls) --- ## Migration Guide - TBD (ask me at the end of the release for meshlet changes as a whole) --------- Co-authored-by: vero <email@atlasdostal.com>
2024-08-26 17:54:34 +00:00
world.get_resource::<InstanceManager>(),
world.get_resource::<PipelineCache>(),
meshlet_view_resources.material_depth.as_ref(),
Meshlet software raster + start of cleanup (#14623) # Objective - Faster meshlet rasterization path for small triangles - Avoid having to allocate and write out a triangle buffer - Refactor gpu_scene.rs ## Solution - Replace the 32bit visbuffer texture with a 64bit visbuffer buffer, where the left 32 bits encode depth, and the right 32 bits encode the existing cluster + triangle IDs. Can't use 64bit textures, wgpu/naga doesn't support atomic ops on textures yet. - Instead of writing out a buffer of packed cluster + triangle IDs (per triangle) to raster, the culling pass now writes out a buffer of just cluster IDs (per cluster, so less memory allocated, cheaper to write out). - Clusters for software raster are allocated from the left side - Clusters for hardware raster are allocated in the same buffer, from the right side - The buffer size is fixed at MeshletPlugin build time, and should be set to a reasonable value for your scene (no warning on overflow, and no good way to determine what value you need outside of renderdoc - I plan to fix this in a future PR adding a meshlet stats overlay) - Currently I don't have a heuristic for software vs hardware raster selection for each cluster. The existing code is just a placeholder. I need to profile on a release scene and come up with a heuristic, probably in a future PR. - The culling shader is getting pretty hard to follow at this point, but I don't want to spend time improving it as the entire shader/pass is getting rewritten/replaced in the near future. - Software raster is a compute workgroup per-cluster. Each workgroup loads and transforms the <=64 vertices of the cluster, and then rasterizes the <=64 triangles of the cluster. - Two variants are implemented: Scanline for clusters with any larger triangles (still smaller than hardware is good at), and brute-force for very very tiny triangles - Once the shader determines that a pixel should be filled in, it does an atomicMax() on the visbuffer to store the results, copying how Nanite works - On devices with a low max workgroups per dispatch limit, an extra compute pass is inserted before software raster to convert from a 1d to 2d dispatch (I don't think 3d would ever be necessary). - I haven't implemented the top-left rule or subpixel precision yet, I'm leaving that for a future PR since I get usable results without it for now - Resources used: https://kristoffer-dyrkorn.github.io/triangle-rasterizer and chapters 6-8 of https://fgiesen.wordpress.com/2013/02/17/optimizing-sw-occlusion-culling-index - Hardware raster now spawns 64*3 vertex invocations per meshlet, instead of the actual meshlet vertex count. Extra invocations just early-exit. - While this is slower than the existing system, hardware draws should be rare now that software raster is usable, and it saves a ton of memory using the unified cluster ID buffer. This would be fixed if wgpu had support for mesh shaders. - Instead of writing to a color+depth attachment, the hardware raster pass also does the same atomic visbuffer writes that software raster uses. - We have to bind a dummy render target anyways, as wgpu doesn't currently support render passes without any attachments - Material IDs are no longer written out during the main rasterization passes. - If we had async compute queues, we could overlap the software and hardware raster passes. - New material and depth resolve passes run at the end of the visbuffer node, and write out view depth and material ID depth textures ### Misc changes - Fixed cluster culling importing, but never actually using the previous view uniforms when doing occlusion culling - Fixed incorrectly adding the LOD error twice when building the meshlet mesh - Splitup gpu_scene module into meshlet_mesh_manager, instance_manager, and resource_manager - resource_manager is still too complex and inefficient (extract and prepare are way too expensive). I plan on improving this in a future PR, but for now ResourceManager is mostly a 1:1 port of the leftover MeshletGpuScene bits. - Material draw passes have been renamed to the more accurate material shade pass, as well as some other misc renaming (in the future, these will be compute shaders even, and not actual draw calls) --- ## Migration Guide - TBD (ask me at the end of the release for meshlet changes as a whole) --------- Co-authored-by: vero <email@atlasdostal.com>
2024-08-26 17:54:34 +00:00
meshlet_view_bind_groups.material_shade.as_ref(),
)
else {
return Ok(());
};
let color_attachments = vec![
view_prepass_textures
.normal
.as_ref()
.map(|normals_texture| normals_texture.get_attachment()),
view_prepass_textures
.motion_vectors
.as_ref()
.map(|motion_vectors_texture| motion_vectors_texture.get_attachment()),
// Use None in place of Deferred attachments
None,
None,
];
let mut render_pass = render_context.begin_tracked_render_pass(RenderPassDescriptor {
label: Some("meshlet_prepass"),
color_attachments: &color_attachments,
depth_stencil_attachment: Some(RenderPassDepthStencilAttachment {
view: &meshlet_material_depth.default_view,
depth_ops: Some(Operations {
load: LoadOp::Load,
store: StoreOp::Store,
}),
stencil_ops: None,
}),
timestamp_writes: None,
occlusion_query_set: None,
});
if let Some(viewport) = camera.viewport.as_ref() {
render_pass.set_camera_viewport(viewport);
}
if view_has_motion_vector_prepass {
render_pass.set_bind_group(
0,
prepass_view_bind_group.motion_vectors.as_ref().unwrap(),
&[
view_uniform_offset.offset,
previous_view_uniform_offset.offset,
],
);
} else {
render_pass.set_bind_group(
0,
prepass_view_bind_group.no_motion_vectors.as_ref().unwrap(),
&[view_uniform_offset.offset],
);
}
Meshlet software raster + start of cleanup (#14623) # Objective - Faster meshlet rasterization path for small triangles - Avoid having to allocate and write out a triangle buffer - Refactor gpu_scene.rs ## Solution - Replace the 32bit visbuffer texture with a 64bit visbuffer buffer, where the left 32 bits encode depth, and the right 32 bits encode the existing cluster + triangle IDs. Can't use 64bit textures, wgpu/naga doesn't support atomic ops on textures yet. - Instead of writing out a buffer of packed cluster + triangle IDs (per triangle) to raster, the culling pass now writes out a buffer of just cluster IDs (per cluster, so less memory allocated, cheaper to write out). - Clusters for software raster are allocated from the left side - Clusters for hardware raster are allocated in the same buffer, from the right side - The buffer size is fixed at MeshletPlugin build time, and should be set to a reasonable value for your scene (no warning on overflow, and no good way to determine what value you need outside of renderdoc - I plan to fix this in a future PR adding a meshlet stats overlay) - Currently I don't have a heuristic for software vs hardware raster selection for each cluster. The existing code is just a placeholder. I need to profile on a release scene and come up with a heuristic, probably in a future PR. - The culling shader is getting pretty hard to follow at this point, but I don't want to spend time improving it as the entire shader/pass is getting rewritten/replaced in the near future. - Software raster is a compute workgroup per-cluster. Each workgroup loads and transforms the <=64 vertices of the cluster, and then rasterizes the <=64 triangles of the cluster. - Two variants are implemented: Scanline for clusters with any larger triangles (still smaller than hardware is good at), and brute-force for very very tiny triangles - Once the shader determines that a pixel should be filled in, it does an atomicMax() on the visbuffer to store the results, copying how Nanite works - On devices with a low max workgroups per dispatch limit, an extra compute pass is inserted before software raster to convert from a 1d to 2d dispatch (I don't think 3d would ever be necessary). - I haven't implemented the top-left rule or subpixel precision yet, I'm leaving that for a future PR since I get usable results without it for now - Resources used: https://kristoffer-dyrkorn.github.io/triangle-rasterizer and chapters 6-8 of https://fgiesen.wordpress.com/2013/02/17/optimizing-sw-occlusion-culling-index - Hardware raster now spawns 64*3 vertex invocations per meshlet, instead of the actual meshlet vertex count. Extra invocations just early-exit. - While this is slower than the existing system, hardware draws should be rare now that software raster is usable, and it saves a ton of memory using the unified cluster ID buffer. This would be fixed if wgpu had support for mesh shaders. - Instead of writing to a color+depth attachment, the hardware raster pass also does the same atomic visbuffer writes that software raster uses. - We have to bind a dummy render target anyways, as wgpu doesn't currently support render passes without any attachments - Material IDs are no longer written out during the main rasterization passes. - If we had async compute queues, we could overlap the software and hardware raster passes. - New material and depth resolve passes run at the end of the visbuffer node, and write out view depth and material ID depth textures ### Misc changes - Fixed cluster culling importing, but never actually using the previous view uniforms when doing occlusion culling - Fixed incorrectly adding the LOD error twice when building the meshlet mesh - Splitup gpu_scene module into meshlet_mesh_manager, instance_manager, and resource_manager - resource_manager is still too complex and inefficient (extract and prepare are way too expensive). I plan on improving this in a future PR, but for now ResourceManager is mostly a 1:1 port of the leftover MeshletGpuScene bits. - Material draw passes have been renamed to the more accurate material shade pass, as well as some other misc renaming (in the future, these will be compute shaders even, and not actual draw calls) --- ## Migration Guide - TBD (ask me at the end of the release for meshlet changes as a whole) --------- Co-authored-by: vero <email@atlasdostal.com>
2024-08-26 17:54:34 +00:00
render_pass.set_bind_group(1, meshlet_material_shade_bind_group, &[]);
// 1 fullscreen triangle draw per material
for (material_id, material_pipeline_id, material_bind_group) in
meshlet_view_materials.iter()
{
Meshlet software raster + start of cleanup (#14623) # Objective - Faster meshlet rasterization path for small triangles - Avoid having to allocate and write out a triangle buffer - Refactor gpu_scene.rs ## Solution - Replace the 32bit visbuffer texture with a 64bit visbuffer buffer, where the left 32 bits encode depth, and the right 32 bits encode the existing cluster + triangle IDs. Can't use 64bit textures, wgpu/naga doesn't support atomic ops on textures yet. - Instead of writing out a buffer of packed cluster + triangle IDs (per triangle) to raster, the culling pass now writes out a buffer of just cluster IDs (per cluster, so less memory allocated, cheaper to write out). - Clusters for software raster are allocated from the left side - Clusters for hardware raster are allocated in the same buffer, from the right side - The buffer size is fixed at MeshletPlugin build time, and should be set to a reasonable value for your scene (no warning on overflow, and no good way to determine what value you need outside of renderdoc - I plan to fix this in a future PR adding a meshlet stats overlay) - Currently I don't have a heuristic for software vs hardware raster selection for each cluster. The existing code is just a placeholder. I need to profile on a release scene and come up with a heuristic, probably in a future PR. - The culling shader is getting pretty hard to follow at this point, but I don't want to spend time improving it as the entire shader/pass is getting rewritten/replaced in the near future. - Software raster is a compute workgroup per-cluster. Each workgroup loads and transforms the <=64 vertices of the cluster, and then rasterizes the <=64 triangles of the cluster. - Two variants are implemented: Scanline for clusters with any larger triangles (still smaller than hardware is good at), and brute-force for very very tiny triangles - Once the shader determines that a pixel should be filled in, it does an atomicMax() on the visbuffer to store the results, copying how Nanite works - On devices with a low max workgroups per dispatch limit, an extra compute pass is inserted before software raster to convert from a 1d to 2d dispatch (I don't think 3d would ever be necessary). - I haven't implemented the top-left rule or subpixel precision yet, I'm leaving that for a future PR since I get usable results without it for now - Resources used: https://kristoffer-dyrkorn.github.io/triangle-rasterizer and chapters 6-8 of https://fgiesen.wordpress.com/2013/02/17/optimizing-sw-occlusion-culling-index - Hardware raster now spawns 64*3 vertex invocations per meshlet, instead of the actual meshlet vertex count. Extra invocations just early-exit. - While this is slower than the existing system, hardware draws should be rare now that software raster is usable, and it saves a ton of memory using the unified cluster ID buffer. This would be fixed if wgpu had support for mesh shaders. - Instead of writing to a color+depth attachment, the hardware raster pass also does the same atomic visbuffer writes that software raster uses. - We have to bind a dummy render target anyways, as wgpu doesn't currently support render passes without any attachments - Material IDs are no longer written out during the main rasterization passes. - If we had async compute queues, we could overlap the software and hardware raster passes. - New material and depth resolve passes run at the end of the visbuffer node, and write out view depth and material ID depth textures ### Misc changes - Fixed cluster culling importing, but never actually using the previous view uniforms when doing occlusion culling - Fixed incorrectly adding the LOD error twice when building the meshlet mesh - Splitup gpu_scene module into meshlet_mesh_manager, instance_manager, and resource_manager - resource_manager is still too complex and inefficient (extract and prepare are way too expensive). I plan on improving this in a future PR, but for now ResourceManager is mostly a 1:1 port of the leftover MeshletGpuScene bits. - Material draw passes have been renamed to the more accurate material shade pass, as well as some other misc renaming (in the future, these will be compute shaders even, and not actual draw calls) --- ## Migration Guide - TBD (ask me at the end of the release for meshlet changes as a whole) --------- Co-authored-by: vero <email@atlasdostal.com>
2024-08-26 17:54:34 +00:00
if instance_manager.material_present_in_scene(material_id) {
if let Some(material_pipeline) =
pipeline_cache.get_render_pipeline(*material_pipeline_id)
{
let x = *material_id * 3;
render_pass.set_render_pipeline(material_pipeline);
render_pass.set_bind_group(2, material_bind_group, &[]);
render_pass.draw(x..(x + 3), 0..1);
}
}
}
Ok(())
}
}
/// Fullscreen pass to generate a gbuffer based on the visibility buffer generated from rasterizing meshlets.
#[derive(Default)]
pub struct MeshletDeferredGBufferPrepassNode;
impl ViewNode for MeshletDeferredGBufferPrepassNode {
type ViewQuery = (
&'static ExtractedCamera,
&'static ViewPrepassTextures,
&'static ViewUniformOffset,
&'static PreviousViewUniformOffset,
Has<MotionVectorPrepass>,
&'static MeshletViewMaterialsDeferredGBufferPrepass,
&'static MeshletViewBindGroups,
&'static MeshletViewResources,
);
fn run(
&self,
_graph: &mut RenderGraphContext,
render_context: &mut RenderContext,
(
camera,
view_prepass_textures,
view_uniform_offset,
previous_view_uniform_offset,
view_has_motion_vector_prepass,
meshlet_view_materials,
meshlet_view_bind_groups,
meshlet_view_resources,
): QueryItem<Self::ViewQuery>,
world: &World,
) -> Result<(), NodeRunError> {
if meshlet_view_materials.is_empty() {
return Ok(());
}
let (
Some(prepass_view_bind_group),
Meshlet software raster + start of cleanup (#14623) # Objective - Faster meshlet rasterization path for small triangles - Avoid having to allocate and write out a triangle buffer - Refactor gpu_scene.rs ## Solution - Replace the 32bit visbuffer texture with a 64bit visbuffer buffer, where the left 32 bits encode depth, and the right 32 bits encode the existing cluster + triangle IDs. Can't use 64bit textures, wgpu/naga doesn't support atomic ops on textures yet. - Instead of writing out a buffer of packed cluster + triangle IDs (per triangle) to raster, the culling pass now writes out a buffer of just cluster IDs (per cluster, so less memory allocated, cheaper to write out). - Clusters for software raster are allocated from the left side - Clusters for hardware raster are allocated in the same buffer, from the right side - The buffer size is fixed at MeshletPlugin build time, and should be set to a reasonable value for your scene (no warning on overflow, and no good way to determine what value you need outside of renderdoc - I plan to fix this in a future PR adding a meshlet stats overlay) - Currently I don't have a heuristic for software vs hardware raster selection for each cluster. The existing code is just a placeholder. I need to profile on a release scene and come up with a heuristic, probably in a future PR. - The culling shader is getting pretty hard to follow at this point, but I don't want to spend time improving it as the entire shader/pass is getting rewritten/replaced in the near future. - Software raster is a compute workgroup per-cluster. Each workgroup loads and transforms the <=64 vertices of the cluster, and then rasterizes the <=64 triangles of the cluster. - Two variants are implemented: Scanline for clusters with any larger triangles (still smaller than hardware is good at), and brute-force for very very tiny triangles - Once the shader determines that a pixel should be filled in, it does an atomicMax() on the visbuffer to store the results, copying how Nanite works - On devices with a low max workgroups per dispatch limit, an extra compute pass is inserted before software raster to convert from a 1d to 2d dispatch (I don't think 3d would ever be necessary). - I haven't implemented the top-left rule or subpixel precision yet, I'm leaving that for a future PR since I get usable results without it for now - Resources used: https://kristoffer-dyrkorn.github.io/triangle-rasterizer and chapters 6-8 of https://fgiesen.wordpress.com/2013/02/17/optimizing-sw-occlusion-culling-index - Hardware raster now spawns 64*3 vertex invocations per meshlet, instead of the actual meshlet vertex count. Extra invocations just early-exit. - While this is slower than the existing system, hardware draws should be rare now that software raster is usable, and it saves a ton of memory using the unified cluster ID buffer. This would be fixed if wgpu had support for mesh shaders. - Instead of writing to a color+depth attachment, the hardware raster pass also does the same atomic visbuffer writes that software raster uses. - We have to bind a dummy render target anyways, as wgpu doesn't currently support render passes without any attachments - Material IDs are no longer written out during the main rasterization passes. - If we had async compute queues, we could overlap the software and hardware raster passes. - New material and depth resolve passes run at the end of the visbuffer node, and write out view depth and material ID depth textures ### Misc changes - Fixed cluster culling importing, but never actually using the previous view uniforms when doing occlusion culling - Fixed incorrectly adding the LOD error twice when building the meshlet mesh - Splitup gpu_scene module into meshlet_mesh_manager, instance_manager, and resource_manager - resource_manager is still too complex and inefficient (extract and prepare are way too expensive). I plan on improving this in a future PR, but for now ResourceManager is mostly a 1:1 port of the leftover MeshletGpuScene bits. - Material draw passes have been renamed to the more accurate material shade pass, as well as some other misc renaming (in the future, these will be compute shaders even, and not actual draw calls) --- ## Migration Guide - TBD (ask me at the end of the release for meshlet changes as a whole) --------- Co-authored-by: vero <email@atlasdostal.com>
2024-08-26 17:54:34 +00:00
Some(instance_manager),
Some(pipeline_cache),
Some(meshlet_material_depth),
Meshlet software raster + start of cleanup (#14623) # Objective - Faster meshlet rasterization path for small triangles - Avoid having to allocate and write out a triangle buffer - Refactor gpu_scene.rs ## Solution - Replace the 32bit visbuffer texture with a 64bit visbuffer buffer, where the left 32 bits encode depth, and the right 32 bits encode the existing cluster + triangle IDs. Can't use 64bit textures, wgpu/naga doesn't support atomic ops on textures yet. - Instead of writing out a buffer of packed cluster + triangle IDs (per triangle) to raster, the culling pass now writes out a buffer of just cluster IDs (per cluster, so less memory allocated, cheaper to write out). - Clusters for software raster are allocated from the left side - Clusters for hardware raster are allocated in the same buffer, from the right side - The buffer size is fixed at MeshletPlugin build time, and should be set to a reasonable value for your scene (no warning on overflow, and no good way to determine what value you need outside of renderdoc - I plan to fix this in a future PR adding a meshlet stats overlay) - Currently I don't have a heuristic for software vs hardware raster selection for each cluster. The existing code is just a placeholder. I need to profile on a release scene and come up with a heuristic, probably in a future PR. - The culling shader is getting pretty hard to follow at this point, but I don't want to spend time improving it as the entire shader/pass is getting rewritten/replaced in the near future. - Software raster is a compute workgroup per-cluster. Each workgroup loads and transforms the <=64 vertices of the cluster, and then rasterizes the <=64 triangles of the cluster. - Two variants are implemented: Scanline for clusters with any larger triangles (still smaller than hardware is good at), and brute-force for very very tiny triangles - Once the shader determines that a pixel should be filled in, it does an atomicMax() on the visbuffer to store the results, copying how Nanite works - On devices with a low max workgroups per dispatch limit, an extra compute pass is inserted before software raster to convert from a 1d to 2d dispatch (I don't think 3d would ever be necessary). - I haven't implemented the top-left rule or subpixel precision yet, I'm leaving that for a future PR since I get usable results without it for now - Resources used: https://kristoffer-dyrkorn.github.io/triangle-rasterizer and chapters 6-8 of https://fgiesen.wordpress.com/2013/02/17/optimizing-sw-occlusion-culling-index - Hardware raster now spawns 64*3 vertex invocations per meshlet, instead of the actual meshlet vertex count. Extra invocations just early-exit. - While this is slower than the existing system, hardware draws should be rare now that software raster is usable, and it saves a ton of memory using the unified cluster ID buffer. This would be fixed if wgpu had support for mesh shaders. - Instead of writing to a color+depth attachment, the hardware raster pass also does the same atomic visbuffer writes that software raster uses. - We have to bind a dummy render target anyways, as wgpu doesn't currently support render passes without any attachments - Material IDs are no longer written out during the main rasterization passes. - If we had async compute queues, we could overlap the software and hardware raster passes. - New material and depth resolve passes run at the end of the visbuffer node, and write out view depth and material ID depth textures ### Misc changes - Fixed cluster culling importing, but never actually using the previous view uniforms when doing occlusion culling - Fixed incorrectly adding the LOD error twice when building the meshlet mesh - Splitup gpu_scene module into meshlet_mesh_manager, instance_manager, and resource_manager - resource_manager is still too complex and inefficient (extract and prepare are way too expensive). I plan on improving this in a future PR, but for now ResourceManager is mostly a 1:1 port of the leftover MeshletGpuScene bits. - Material draw passes have been renamed to the more accurate material shade pass, as well as some other misc renaming (in the future, these will be compute shaders even, and not actual draw calls) --- ## Migration Guide - TBD (ask me at the end of the release for meshlet changes as a whole) --------- Co-authored-by: vero <email@atlasdostal.com>
2024-08-26 17:54:34 +00:00
Some(meshlet_material_shade_bind_group),
) = (
world.get_resource::<PrepassViewBindGroup>(),
Meshlet software raster + start of cleanup (#14623) # Objective - Faster meshlet rasterization path for small triangles - Avoid having to allocate and write out a triangle buffer - Refactor gpu_scene.rs ## Solution - Replace the 32bit visbuffer texture with a 64bit visbuffer buffer, where the left 32 bits encode depth, and the right 32 bits encode the existing cluster + triangle IDs. Can't use 64bit textures, wgpu/naga doesn't support atomic ops on textures yet. - Instead of writing out a buffer of packed cluster + triangle IDs (per triangle) to raster, the culling pass now writes out a buffer of just cluster IDs (per cluster, so less memory allocated, cheaper to write out). - Clusters for software raster are allocated from the left side - Clusters for hardware raster are allocated in the same buffer, from the right side - The buffer size is fixed at MeshletPlugin build time, and should be set to a reasonable value for your scene (no warning on overflow, and no good way to determine what value you need outside of renderdoc - I plan to fix this in a future PR adding a meshlet stats overlay) - Currently I don't have a heuristic for software vs hardware raster selection for each cluster. The existing code is just a placeholder. I need to profile on a release scene and come up with a heuristic, probably in a future PR. - The culling shader is getting pretty hard to follow at this point, but I don't want to spend time improving it as the entire shader/pass is getting rewritten/replaced in the near future. - Software raster is a compute workgroup per-cluster. Each workgroup loads and transforms the <=64 vertices of the cluster, and then rasterizes the <=64 triangles of the cluster. - Two variants are implemented: Scanline for clusters with any larger triangles (still smaller than hardware is good at), and brute-force for very very tiny triangles - Once the shader determines that a pixel should be filled in, it does an atomicMax() on the visbuffer to store the results, copying how Nanite works - On devices with a low max workgroups per dispatch limit, an extra compute pass is inserted before software raster to convert from a 1d to 2d dispatch (I don't think 3d would ever be necessary). - I haven't implemented the top-left rule or subpixel precision yet, I'm leaving that for a future PR since I get usable results without it for now - Resources used: https://kristoffer-dyrkorn.github.io/triangle-rasterizer and chapters 6-8 of https://fgiesen.wordpress.com/2013/02/17/optimizing-sw-occlusion-culling-index - Hardware raster now spawns 64*3 vertex invocations per meshlet, instead of the actual meshlet vertex count. Extra invocations just early-exit. - While this is slower than the existing system, hardware draws should be rare now that software raster is usable, and it saves a ton of memory using the unified cluster ID buffer. This would be fixed if wgpu had support for mesh shaders. - Instead of writing to a color+depth attachment, the hardware raster pass also does the same atomic visbuffer writes that software raster uses. - We have to bind a dummy render target anyways, as wgpu doesn't currently support render passes without any attachments - Material IDs are no longer written out during the main rasterization passes. - If we had async compute queues, we could overlap the software and hardware raster passes. - New material and depth resolve passes run at the end of the visbuffer node, and write out view depth and material ID depth textures ### Misc changes - Fixed cluster culling importing, but never actually using the previous view uniforms when doing occlusion culling - Fixed incorrectly adding the LOD error twice when building the meshlet mesh - Splitup gpu_scene module into meshlet_mesh_manager, instance_manager, and resource_manager - resource_manager is still too complex and inefficient (extract and prepare are way too expensive). I plan on improving this in a future PR, but for now ResourceManager is mostly a 1:1 port of the leftover MeshletGpuScene bits. - Material draw passes have been renamed to the more accurate material shade pass, as well as some other misc renaming (in the future, these will be compute shaders even, and not actual draw calls) --- ## Migration Guide - TBD (ask me at the end of the release for meshlet changes as a whole) --------- Co-authored-by: vero <email@atlasdostal.com>
2024-08-26 17:54:34 +00:00
world.get_resource::<InstanceManager>(),
world.get_resource::<PipelineCache>(),
meshlet_view_resources.material_depth.as_ref(),
Meshlet software raster + start of cleanup (#14623) # Objective - Faster meshlet rasterization path for small triangles - Avoid having to allocate and write out a triangle buffer - Refactor gpu_scene.rs ## Solution - Replace the 32bit visbuffer texture with a 64bit visbuffer buffer, where the left 32 bits encode depth, and the right 32 bits encode the existing cluster + triangle IDs. Can't use 64bit textures, wgpu/naga doesn't support atomic ops on textures yet. - Instead of writing out a buffer of packed cluster + triangle IDs (per triangle) to raster, the culling pass now writes out a buffer of just cluster IDs (per cluster, so less memory allocated, cheaper to write out). - Clusters for software raster are allocated from the left side - Clusters for hardware raster are allocated in the same buffer, from the right side - The buffer size is fixed at MeshletPlugin build time, and should be set to a reasonable value for your scene (no warning on overflow, and no good way to determine what value you need outside of renderdoc - I plan to fix this in a future PR adding a meshlet stats overlay) - Currently I don't have a heuristic for software vs hardware raster selection for each cluster. The existing code is just a placeholder. I need to profile on a release scene and come up with a heuristic, probably in a future PR. - The culling shader is getting pretty hard to follow at this point, but I don't want to spend time improving it as the entire shader/pass is getting rewritten/replaced in the near future. - Software raster is a compute workgroup per-cluster. Each workgroup loads and transforms the <=64 vertices of the cluster, and then rasterizes the <=64 triangles of the cluster. - Two variants are implemented: Scanline for clusters with any larger triangles (still smaller than hardware is good at), and brute-force for very very tiny triangles - Once the shader determines that a pixel should be filled in, it does an atomicMax() on the visbuffer to store the results, copying how Nanite works - On devices with a low max workgroups per dispatch limit, an extra compute pass is inserted before software raster to convert from a 1d to 2d dispatch (I don't think 3d would ever be necessary). - I haven't implemented the top-left rule or subpixel precision yet, I'm leaving that for a future PR since I get usable results without it for now - Resources used: https://kristoffer-dyrkorn.github.io/triangle-rasterizer and chapters 6-8 of https://fgiesen.wordpress.com/2013/02/17/optimizing-sw-occlusion-culling-index - Hardware raster now spawns 64*3 vertex invocations per meshlet, instead of the actual meshlet vertex count. Extra invocations just early-exit. - While this is slower than the existing system, hardware draws should be rare now that software raster is usable, and it saves a ton of memory using the unified cluster ID buffer. This would be fixed if wgpu had support for mesh shaders. - Instead of writing to a color+depth attachment, the hardware raster pass also does the same atomic visbuffer writes that software raster uses. - We have to bind a dummy render target anyways, as wgpu doesn't currently support render passes without any attachments - Material IDs are no longer written out during the main rasterization passes. - If we had async compute queues, we could overlap the software and hardware raster passes. - New material and depth resolve passes run at the end of the visbuffer node, and write out view depth and material ID depth textures ### Misc changes - Fixed cluster culling importing, but never actually using the previous view uniforms when doing occlusion culling - Fixed incorrectly adding the LOD error twice when building the meshlet mesh - Splitup gpu_scene module into meshlet_mesh_manager, instance_manager, and resource_manager - resource_manager is still too complex and inefficient (extract and prepare are way too expensive). I plan on improving this in a future PR, but for now ResourceManager is mostly a 1:1 port of the leftover MeshletGpuScene bits. - Material draw passes have been renamed to the more accurate material shade pass, as well as some other misc renaming (in the future, these will be compute shaders even, and not actual draw calls) --- ## Migration Guide - TBD (ask me at the end of the release for meshlet changes as a whole) --------- Co-authored-by: vero <email@atlasdostal.com>
2024-08-26 17:54:34 +00:00
meshlet_view_bind_groups.material_shade.as_ref(),
)
else {
return Ok(());
};
let color_attachments = vec![
view_prepass_textures
.normal
.as_ref()
.map(|normals_texture| normals_texture.get_attachment()),
view_prepass_textures
.motion_vectors
.as_ref()
.map(|motion_vectors_texture| motion_vectors_texture.get_attachment()),
view_prepass_textures
.deferred
.as_ref()
.map(|deferred_texture| deferred_texture.get_attachment()),
view_prepass_textures
.deferred_lighting_pass_id
.as_ref()
.map(|deferred_lighting_pass_id| deferred_lighting_pass_id.get_attachment()),
];
let mut render_pass = render_context.begin_tracked_render_pass(RenderPassDescriptor {
label: Some("meshlet_deferred_prepass"),
color_attachments: &color_attachments,
depth_stencil_attachment: Some(RenderPassDepthStencilAttachment {
view: &meshlet_material_depth.default_view,
depth_ops: Some(Operations {
load: LoadOp::Load,
store: StoreOp::Store,
}),
stencil_ops: None,
}),
timestamp_writes: None,
occlusion_query_set: None,
});
if let Some(viewport) = camera.viewport.as_ref() {
render_pass.set_camera_viewport(viewport);
}
if view_has_motion_vector_prepass {
render_pass.set_bind_group(
0,
prepass_view_bind_group.motion_vectors.as_ref().unwrap(),
&[
view_uniform_offset.offset,
previous_view_uniform_offset.offset,
],
);
} else {
render_pass.set_bind_group(
0,
prepass_view_bind_group.no_motion_vectors.as_ref().unwrap(),
&[view_uniform_offset.offset],
);
}
Meshlet software raster + start of cleanup (#14623) # Objective - Faster meshlet rasterization path for small triangles - Avoid having to allocate and write out a triangle buffer - Refactor gpu_scene.rs ## Solution - Replace the 32bit visbuffer texture with a 64bit visbuffer buffer, where the left 32 bits encode depth, and the right 32 bits encode the existing cluster + triangle IDs. Can't use 64bit textures, wgpu/naga doesn't support atomic ops on textures yet. - Instead of writing out a buffer of packed cluster + triangle IDs (per triangle) to raster, the culling pass now writes out a buffer of just cluster IDs (per cluster, so less memory allocated, cheaper to write out). - Clusters for software raster are allocated from the left side - Clusters for hardware raster are allocated in the same buffer, from the right side - The buffer size is fixed at MeshletPlugin build time, and should be set to a reasonable value for your scene (no warning on overflow, and no good way to determine what value you need outside of renderdoc - I plan to fix this in a future PR adding a meshlet stats overlay) - Currently I don't have a heuristic for software vs hardware raster selection for each cluster. The existing code is just a placeholder. I need to profile on a release scene and come up with a heuristic, probably in a future PR. - The culling shader is getting pretty hard to follow at this point, but I don't want to spend time improving it as the entire shader/pass is getting rewritten/replaced in the near future. - Software raster is a compute workgroup per-cluster. Each workgroup loads and transforms the <=64 vertices of the cluster, and then rasterizes the <=64 triangles of the cluster. - Two variants are implemented: Scanline for clusters with any larger triangles (still smaller than hardware is good at), and brute-force for very very tiny triangles - Once the shader determines that a pixel should be filled in, it does an atomicMax() on the visbuffer to store the results, copying how Nanite works - On devices with a low max workgroups per dispatch limit, an extra compute pass is inserted before software raster to convert from a 1d to 2d dispatch (I don't think 3d would ever be necessary). - I haven't implemented the top-left rule or subpixel precision yet, I'm leaving that for a future PR since I get usable results without it for now - Resources used: https://kristoffer-dyrkorn.github.io/triangle-rasterizer and chapters 6-8 of https://fgiesen.wordpress.com/2013/02/17/optimizing-sw-occlusion-culling-index - Hardware raster now spawns 64*3 vertex invocations per meshlet, instead of the actual meshlet vertex count. Extra invocations just early-exit. - While this is slower than the existing system, hardware draws should be rare now that software raster is usable, and it saves a ton of memory using the unified cluster ID buffer. This would be fixed if wgpu had support for mesh shaders. - Instead of writing to a color+depth attachment, the hardware raster pass also does the same atomic visbuffer writes that software raster uses. - We have to bind a dummy render target anyways, as wgpu doesn't currently support render passes without any attachments - Material IDs are no longer written out during the main rasterization passes. - If we had async compute queues, we could overlap the software and hardware raster passes. - New material and depth resolve passes run at the end of the visbuffer node, and write out view depth and material ID depth textures ### Misc changes - Fixed cluster culling importing, but never actually using the previous view uniforms when doing occlusion culling - Fixed incorrectly adding the LOD error twice when building the meshlet mesh - Splitup gpu_scene module into meshlet_mesh_manager, instance_manager, and resource_manager - resource_manager is still too complex and inefficient (extract and prepare are way too expensive). I plan on improving this in a future PR, but for now ResourceManager is mostly a 1:1 port of the leftover MeshletGpuScene bits. - Material draw passes have been renamed to the more accurate material shade pass, as well as some other misc renaming (in the future, these will be compute shaders even, and not actual draw calls) --- ## Migration Guide - TBD (ask me at the end of the release for meshlet changes as a whole) --------- Co-authored-by: vero <email@atlasdostal.com>
2024-08-26 17:54:34 +00:00
render_pass.set_bind_group(1, meshlet_material_shade_bind_group, &[]);
// 1 fullscreen triangle draw per material
for (material_id, material_pipeline_id, material_bind_group) in
meshlet_view_materials.iter()
{
Meshlet software raster + start of cleanup (#14623) # Objective - Faster meshlet rasterization path for small triangles - Avoid having to allocate and write out a triangle buffer - Refactor gpu_scene.rs ## Solution - Replace the 32bit visbuffer texture with a 64bit visbuffer buffer, where the left 32 bits encode depth, and the right 32 bits encode the existing cluster + triangle IDs. Can't use 64bit textures, wgpu/naga doesn't support atomic ops on textures yet. - Instead of writing out a buffer of packed cluster + triangle IDs (per triangle) to raster, the culling pass now writes out a buffer of just cluster IDs (per cluster, so less memory allocated, cheaper to write out). - Clusters for software raster are allocated from the left side - Clusters for hardware raster are allocated in the same buffer, from the right side - The buffer size is fixed at MeshletPlugin build time, and should be set to a reasonable value for your scene (no warning on overflow, and no good way to determine what value you need outside of renderdoc - I plan to fix this in a future PR adding a meshlet stats overlay) - Currently I don't have a heuristic for software vs hardware raster selection for each cluster. The existing code is just a placeholder. I need to profile on a release scene and come up with a heuristic, probably in a future PR. - The culling shader is getting pretty hard to follow at this point, but I don't want to spend time improving it as the entire shader/pass is getting rewritten/replaced in the near future. - Software raster is a compute workgroup per-cluster. Each workgroup loads and transforms the <=64 vertices of the cluster, and then rasterizes the <=64 triangles of the cluster. - Two variants are implemented: Scanline for clusters with any larger triangles (still smaller than hardware is good at), and brute-force for very very tiny triangles - Once the shader determines that a pixel should be filled in, it does an atomicMax() on the visbuffer to store the results, copying how Nanite works - On devices with a low max workgroups per dispatch limit, an extra compute pass is inserted before software raster to convert from a 1d to 2d dispatch (I don't think 3d would ever be necessary). - I haven't implemented the top-left rule or subpixel precision yet, I'm leaving that for a future PR since I get usable results without it for now - Resources used: https://kristoffer-dyrkorn.github.io/triangle-rasterizer and chapters 6-8 of https://fgiesen.wordpress.com/2013/02/17/optimizing-sw-occlusion-culling-index - Hardware raster now spawns 64*3 vertex invocations per meshlet, instead of the actual meshlet vertex count. Extra invocations just early-exit. - While this is slower than the existing system, hardware draws should be rare now that software raster is usable, and it saves a ton of memory using the unified cluster ID buffer. This would be fixed if wgpu had support for mesh shaders. - Instead of writing to a color+depth attachment, the hardware raster pass also does the same atomic visbuffer writes that software raster uses. - We have to bind a dummy render target anyways, as wgpu doesn't currently support render passes without any attachments - Material IDs are no longer written out during the main rasterization passes. - If we had async compute queues, we could overlap the software and hardware raster passes. - New material and depth resolve passes run at the end of the visbuffer node, and write out view depth and material ID depth textures ### Misc changes - Fixed cluster culling importing, but never actually using the previous view uniforms when doing occlusion culling - Fixed incorrectly adding the LOD error twice when building the meshlet mesh - Splitup gpu_scene module into meshlet_mesh_manager, instance_manager, and resource_manager - resource_manager is still too complex and inefficient (extract and prepare are way too expensive). I plan on improving this in a future PR, but for now ResourceManager is mostly a 1:1 port of the leftover MeshletGpuScene bits. - Material draw passes have been renamed to the more accurate material shade pass, as well as some other misc renaming (in the future, these will be compute shaders even, and not actual draw calls) --- ## Migration Guide - TBD (ask me at the end of the release for meshlet changes as a whole) --------- Co-authored-by: vero <email@atlasdostal.com>
2024-08-26 17:54:34 +00:00
if instance_manager.material_present_in_scene(material_id) {
if let Some(material_pipeline) =
pipeline_cache.get_render_pipeline(*material_pipeline_id)
{
let x = *material_id * 3;
render_pass.set_render_pipeline(material_pipeline);
render_pass.set_bind_group(2, material_bind_group, &[]);
render_pass.draw(x..(x + 3), 0..1);
}
}
}
Ok(())
}
}