2022-05-16 13:53:20 +00:00
|
|
|
//! Shows how to render a polygonal [`Mesh`], generated from a [`Quad`] primitive, in a 2D scene.
|
Fix intra-doc link warnings (#10445)
When `cargo doc -Zunstable-options -Zrustdoc-scrape-examples` (trying to
figure out why it doesn't work with bevy), I had the following warnings:
```
warning: unresolved link to `Quad`
--> examples/2d/mesh2d.rs:1:66
|
1 | //! Shows how to render a polygonal [`Mesh`], generated from a [`Quad`] primitive, in a 2D scene.
| ^^^^ no item named `Quad` in scope
|
= help: to escape `[` and `]` characters, add '\' before them like `\[` or `\]`
= note: `#[warn(rustdoc::broken_intra_doc_links)]` on by default
warning: `bevy` (example "mesh2d") generated 1 warning
warning: unresolved link to `update_weights`
--> examples/animation/morph_targets.rs:6:17
|
6 | //! See the [`update_weights`] system for details.
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ no item named `update_weights` in scope
|
= help: to escape `[` and `]` characters, add '\' before them like `\[` or `\]`
= note: `#[warn(rustdoc::broken_intra_doc_links)]` on by default
warning: public documentation for `morph_targets` links to private item `name_morphs`
--> examples/animation/morph_targets.rs:7:43
|
7 | //! - How to read morph target names in [`name_morphs`].
| ^^^^^^^^^^^ this item is private
|
= note: this link will resolve properly if you pass `--document-private-items`
= note: `#[warn(rustdoc::private_intra_doc_links)]` on by default
warning: public documentation for `morph_targets` links to private item `setup_animations`
--> examples/animation/morph_targets.rs:8:48
|
8 | //! - How to play morph target animations in [`setup_animations`].
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ this item is private
|
= note: this link will resolve properly if you pass `--document-private-items`
warning: `bevy` (example "morph_targets") generated 3 warnings
warning: unresolved link to `Quad`
--> examples/2d/mesh2d_vertex_color_texture.rs:1:66
|
1 | //! Shows how to render a polygonal [`Mesh`], generated from a [`Quad`] primitive, in a 2D scene.
| ^^^^ no item named `Quad` in scope
|
= help: to escape `[` and `]` characters, add '\' before them like `\[` or `\]`
= note: `#[warn(rustdoc::broken_intra_doc_links)]` on by default
warning: `bevy` (example "mesh2d_vertex_color_texture") generated 1 warning
warning: unresolved link to `UIScale`
--> examples/ui/ui_scaling.rs:1:36
|
1 | //! This example illustrates the [`UIScale`] resource from `bevy_ui`.
| ^^^^^^^ no item named `UIScale` in scope
|
= help: to escape `[` and `]` characters, add '\' before them like `\[` or `\]`
= note: `#[warn(rustdoc::broken_intra_doc_links)]` on by default
warning: `bevy` (example "ui_scaling") generated 1 warning
warning: unresolved link to `dependencies`
--> examples/app/headless.rs:5:6
|
5 | //! [dependencies]
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^ no item named `dependencies` in scope
|
= help: to escape `[` and `]` characters, add '\' before them like `\[` or `\]`
= note: `#[warn(rustdoc::broken_intra_doc_links)]` on by default
warning: `bevy` (example "headless") generated 1 warning
warning: unresolved link to `Material2d`
--> examples/2d/mesh2d_manual.rs:3:26
|
3 | //! It doesn't use the [`Material2d`] abstraction, but changes the vertex buffer to include verte...
| ^^^^^^^^^^ no item named `Material2d` in scope
|
= help: to escape `[` and `]` characters, add '\' before them like `\[` or `\]`
= note: `#[warn(rustdoc::broken_intra_doc_links)]` on by default
warning: `bevy` (example "mesh2d_manual") generated 1 warning
```
2023-11-08 14:33:46 +00:00
|
|
|
//!
|
2023-11-28 23:43:40 +00:00
|
|
|
//! [`Quad`]: shape::Quad
|
2022-05-16 13:53:20 +00:00
|
|
|
|
Add 2d meshes and materials (#3460)
# Objective
The current 2d rendering is specialized to render sprites, we need a generic way to render 2d items, using meshes and materials like we have for 3d.
## Solution
I cloned a good part of `bevy_pbr` into `bevy_sprite/src/mesh2d`, removed lighting and pbr itself, adapted it to 2d rendering, added a `ColorMaterial`, and modified the sprite rendering to break batches around 2d meshes.
~~The PR is a bit crude; I tried to change as little as I could in both the parts copied from 3d and the current sprite rendering to make reviewing easier. In the future, I expect we could make the sprite rendering a normal 2d material, cleanly integrated with the rest.~~ _edit: see <https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/pull/3460#issuecomment-1003605194>_
## Remaining work
- ~~don't require mesh normals~~ _out of scope_
- ~~add an example~~ _done_
- support 2d meshes & materials in the UI?
- bikeshed names (I didn't think hard about naming, please check if it's fine)
## Remaining questions
- ~~should we add a depth buffer to 2d now that there are 2d meshes?~~ _let's revisit that when we have an opaque render phase_
- ~~should we add MSAA support to the sprites, or remove it from the 2d meshes?~~ _I added MSAA to sprites since it's really needed for 2d meshes_
- ~~how to customize vertex attributes?~~ _#3120_
Co-authored-by: Carter Anderson <mcanders1@gmail.com>
2022-01-08 01:29:08 +00:00
|
|
|
use bevy::{prelude::*, sprite::MaterialMesh2dBundle};
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
fn main() {
|
|
|
|
|
App::new()
|
|
|
|
|
.add_plugins(DefaultPlugins)
|
2023-03-18 01:45:34 +00:00
|
|
|
.add_systems(Startup, setup)
|
Add 2d meshes and materials (#3460)
# Objective
The current 2d rendering is specialized to render sprites, we need a generic way to render 2d items, using meshes and materials like we have for 3d.
## Solution
I cloned a good part of `bevy_pbr` into `bevy_sprite/src/mesh2d`, removed lighting and pbr itself, adapted it to 2d rendering, added a `ColorMaterial`, and modified the sprite rendering to break batches around 2d meshes.
~~The PR is a bit crude; I tried to change as little as I could in both the parts copied from 3d and the current sprite rendering to make reviewing easier. In the future, I expect we could make the sprite rendering a normal 2d material, cleanly integrated with the rest.~~ _edit: see <https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/pull/3460#issuecomment-1003605194>_
## Remaining work
- ~~don't require mesh normals~~ _out of scope_
- ~~add an example~~ _done_
- support 2d meshes & materials in the UI?
- bikeshed names (I didn't think hard about naming, please check if it's fine)
## Remaining questions
- ~~should we add a depth buffer to 2d now that there are 2d meshes?~~ _let's revisit that when we have an opaque render phase_
- ~~should we add MSAA support to the sprites, or remove it from the 2d meshes?~~ _I added MSAA to sprites since it's really needed for 2d meshes_
- ~~how to customize vertex attributes?~~ _#3120_
Co-authored-by: Carter Anderson <mcanders1@gmail.com>
2022-01-08 01:29:08 +00:00
|
|
|
.run();
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
fn setup(
|
|
|
|
|
mut commands: Commands,
|
|
|
|
|
mut meshes: ResMut<Assets<Mesh>>,
|
|
|
|
|
mut materials: ResMut<Assets<ColorMaterial>>,
|
|
|
|
|
) {
|
Spawn now takes a Bundle (#6054)
# Objective
Now that we can consolidate Bundles and Components under a single insert (thanks to #2975 and #6039), almost 100% of world spawns now look like `world.spawn().insert((Some, Tuple, Here))`. Spawning an entity without any components is an extremely uncommon pattern, so it makes sense to give spawn the "first class" ergonomic api. This consolidated api should be made consistent across all spawn apis (such as World and Commands).
## Solution
All `spawn` apis (`World::spawn`, `Commands:;spawn`, `ChildBuilder::spawn`, and `WorldChildBuilder::spawn`) now accept a bundle as input:
```rust
// before:
commands
.spawn()
.insert((A, B, C));
world
.spawn()
.insert((A, B, C);
// after
commands.spawn((A, B, C));
world.spawn((A, B, C));
```
All existing instances of `spawn_bundle` have been deprecated in favor of the new `spawn` api. A new `spawn_empty` has been added, replacing the old `spawn` api.
By allowing `world.spawn(some_bundle)` to replace `world.spawn().insert(some_bundle)`, this opened the door to removing the initial entity allocation in the "empty" archetype / table done in `spawn()` (and subsequent move to the actual archetype in `.insert(some_bundle)`).
This improves spawn performance by over 10%:
To take this measurement, I added a new `world_spawn` benchmark.
Unfortunately, optimizing `Commands::spawn` is slightly less trivial, as Commands expose the Entity id of spawned entities prior to actually spawning. Doing the optimization would (naively) require assurances that the `spawn(some_bundle)` command is applied before all other commands involving the entity (which would not necessarily be true, if memory serves). Optimizing `Commands::spawn` this way does feel possible, but it will require careful thought (and maybe some additional checks), which deserves its own PR. For now, it has the same performance characteristics of the current `Commands::spawn_bundle` on main.
**Note that 99% of this PR is simple renames and refactors. The only code that needs careful scrutiny is the new `World::spawn()` impl, which is relatively straightforward, but it has some new unsafe code (which re-uses battle tested BundlerSpawner code path).**
---
## Changelog
- All `spawn` apis (`World::spawn`, `Commands:;spawn`, `ChildBuilder::spawn`, and `WorldChildBuilder::spawn`) now accept a bundle as input
- All instances of `spawn_bundle` have been deprecated in favor of the new `spawn` api
- World and Commands now have `spawn_empty()`, which is equivalent to the old `spawn()` behavior.
## Migration Guide
```rust
// Old (0.8):
commands
.spawn()
.insert_bundle((A, B, C));
// New (0.9)
commands.spawn((A, B, C));
// Old (0.8):
commands.spawn_bundle((A, B, C));
// New (0.9)
commands.spawn((A, B, C));
// Old (0.8):
let entity = commands.spawn().id();
// New (0.9)
let entity = commands.spawn_empty().id();
// Old (0.8)
let entity = world.spawn().id();
// New (0.9)
let entity = world.spawn_empty();
```
2022-09-23 19:55:54 +00:00
|
|
|
commands.spawn(Camera2dBundle::default());
|
|
|
|
|
commands.spawn(MaterialMesh2dBundle {
|
Use `impl Into<A>` for `Assets::add` (#10878)
# Motivation
When spawning entities into a scene, it is very common to create assets
like meshes and materials and to add them via asset handles. A common
setup might look like this:
```rust
fn setup(
mut commands: Commands,
mut meshes: ResMut<Assets<Mesh>>,
mut materials: ResMut<Assets<StandardMaterial>>,
) {
commands.spawn(PbrBundle {
mesh: meshes.add(Mesh::from(shape::Cube { size: 1.0 })),
material: materials.add(StandardMaterial::from(Color::RED)),
..default()
});
}
```
Let's take a closer look at the part that adds the assets using `add`.
```rust
mesh: meshes.add(Mesh::from(shape::Cube { size: 1.0 })),
material: materials.add(StandardMaterial::from(Color::RED)),
```
Here, "mesh" and "material" are both repeated three times. It's very
explicit, but I find it to be a bit verbose. In addition to being more
code to read and write, the extra characters can sometimes also lead to
the code being formatted to span multiple lines even though the core
task, adding e.g. a primitive mesh, is extremely simple.
A way to address this is by using `.into()`:
```rust
mesh: meshes.add(shape::Cube { size: 1.0 }.into()),
material: materials.add(Color::RED.into()),
```
This is fine, but from the names and the type of `meshes`, we already
know what the type should be. It's very clear that `Cube` should be
turned into a `Mesh` because of the context it's used in. `.into()` is
just seven characters, but it's so common that it quickly adds up and
gets annoying.
It would be nice if you could skip all of the conversion and let Bevy
handle it for you:
```rust
mesh: meshes.add(shape::Cube { size: 1.0 }),
material: materials.add(Color::RED),
```
# Objective
Make adding assets more ergonomic by making `Assets::add` take an `impl
Into<A>` instead of `A`.
## Solution
`Assets::add` now takes an `impl Into<A>` instead of `A`, so e.g. this
works:
```rust
commands.spawn(PbrBundle {
mesh: meshes.add(shape::Cube { size: 1.0 }),
material: materials.add(Color::RED),
..default()
});
```
I also changed all examples to use this API, which increases consistency
as well because `Mesh::from` and `into` were being used arbitrarily even
in the same file. This also gets rid of some lines of code because
formatting is nicer.
---
## Changelog
- `Assets::add` now takes an `impl Into<A>` instead of `A`
- Examples don't use `T::from(K)` or `K.into()` when adding assets
## Migration Guide
Some `into` calls that worked previously might now be broken because of
the new trait bounds. You need to either remove `into` or perform the
conversion explicitly with `from`:
```rust
// Doesn't compile
let mesh_handle = meshes.add(shape::Cube { size: 1.0 }.into()),
// These compile
let mesh_handle = meshes.add(shape::Cube { size: 1.0 }),
let mesh_handle = meshes.add(Mesh::from(shape::Cube { size: 1.0 })),
```
## Concerns
I believe the primary concerns might be:
1. Is this too implicit?
2. Does this increase codegen bloat?
Previously, the two APIs were using `into` or `from`, and now it's
"nothing" or `from`. You could argue that `into` is slightly more
explicit than "nothing" in cases like the earlier examples where a
`Color` gets converted to e.g. a `StandardMaterial`, but I personally
don't think `into` adds much value even in this case, and you could
still see the actual type from the asset type.
As for codegen bloat, I doubt it adds that much, but I'm not very
familiar with the details of codegen. I personally value the user-facing
code reduction and ergonomics improvements that these changes would
provide, but it might be worth checking the other effects in more
detail.
Another slight concern is migration pain; apps might have a ton of
`into` calls that would need to be removed, and it did take me a while
to do so for Bevy itself (maybe around 20-40 minutes). However, I think
the fact that there *are* so many `into` calls just highlights that the
API could be made nicer, and I'd gladly migrate my own projects for it.
2024-01-08 22:14:43 +00:00
|
|
|
mesh: meshes.add(shape::Quad::default()).into(),
|
Add 2d meshes and materials (#3460)
# Objective
The current 2d rendering is specialized to render sprites, we need a generic way to render 2d items, using meshes and materials like we have for 3d.
## Solution
I cloned a good part of `bevy_pbr` into `bevy_sprite/src/mesh2d`, removed lighting and pbr itself, adapted it to 2d rendering, added a `ColorMaterial`, and modified the sprite rendering to break batches around 2d meshes.
~~The PR is a bit crude; I tried to change as little as I could in both the parts copied from 3d and the current sprite rendering to make reviewing easier. In the future, I expect we could make the sprite rendering a normal 2d material, cleanly integrated with the rest.~~ _edit: see <https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/pull/3460#issuecomment-1003605194>_
## Remaining work
- ~~don't require mesh normals~~ _out of scope_
- ~~add an example~~ _done_
- support 2d meshes & materials in the UI?
- bikeshed names (I didn't think hard about naming, please check if it's fine)
## Remaining questions
- ~~should we add a depth buffer to 2d now that there are 2d meshes?~~ _let's revisit that when we have an opaque render phase_
- ~~should we add MSAA support to the sprites, or remove it from the 2d meshes?~~ _I added MSAA to sprites since it's really needed for 2d meshes_
- ~~how to customize vertex attributes?~~ _#3120_
Co-authored-by: Carter Anderson <mcanders1@gmail.com>
2022-01-08 01:29:08 +00:00
|
|
|
transform: Transform::default().with_scale(Vec3::splat(128.)),
|
2024-01-09 00:44:24 +00:00
|
|
|
material: materials.add(Color::PURPLE),
|
2022-03-01 20:52:09 +00:00
|
|
|
..default()
|
Add 2d meshes and materials (#3460)
# Objective
The current 2d rendering is specialized to render sprites, we need a generic way to render 2d items, using meshes and materials like we have for 3d.
## Solution
I cloned a good part of `bevy_pbr` into `bevy_sprite/src/mesh2d`, removed lighting and pbr itself, adapted it to 2d rendering, added a `ColorMaterial`, and modified the sprite rendering to break batches around 2d meshes.
~~The PR is a bit crude; I tried to change as little as I could in both the parts copied from 3d and the current sprite rendering to make reviewing easier. In the future, I expect we could make the sprite rendering a normal 2d material, cleanly integrated with the rest.~~ _edit: see <https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/pull/3460#issuecomment-1003605194>_
## Remaining work
- ~~don't require mesh normals~~ _out of scope_
- ~~add an example~~ _done_
- support 2d meshes & materials in the UI?
- bikeshed names (I didn't think hard about naming, please check if it's fine)
## Remaining questions
- ~~should we add a depth buffer to 2d now that there are 2d meshes?~~ _let's revisit that when we have an opaque render phase_
- ~~should we add MSAA support to the sprites, or remove it from the 2d meshes?~~ _I added MSAA to sprites since it's really needed for 2d meshes_
- ~~how to customize vertex attributes?~~ _#3120_
Co-authored-by: Carter Anderson <mcanders1@gmail.com>
2022-01-08 01:29:08 +00:00
|
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
