Mirrors/bevy
2
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy synced 2024-12-19 01:23:09 +00:00
Code Issues Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity
bevy/crates/bevy_gizmos/macros/Cargo.toml

28 lines
582 B
TOML
Raw Normal View History

Multiple Configurations for Gizmos (#10342) # Objective This PR aims to implement multiple configs for gizmos as discussed in #9187. ## Solution Configs for the new `GizmoConfigGroup`s are stored in a `GizmoConfigStore` resource and can be accesses using a type based key or iterated over. This type based key doubles as a standardized location where plugin authors can put their own configuration not covered by the standard `GizmoConfig` struct. For example the `AabbGizmoGroup` has a default color and toggle to show all AABBs. New configs can be registered using `app.init_gizmo_group::<T>()` during startup. When requesting the `Gizmos<T>` system parameter the generic type determines which config is used. The config structs are available through the `Gizmos` system parameter allowing for easy access while drawing your gizmos. Internally, resources and systems used for rendering (up to an including the extract system) are generic over the type based key and inserted on registering a new config. ## Alternatives The configs could be stored as components on entities with markers which would make better use of the ECS. I also implemented this approach ([here](https://github.com/jeliag/bevy/tree/gizmo-multiconf-comp)) and believe that the ergonomic benefits of a central config store outweigh the decreased use of the ECS. ## Unsafe Code Implementing system parameter by hand is unsafe but seems to be required to access the config store once and not on every gizmo draw function call. This is critical for performance. ~Is there a better way to do this?~ ## Future Work New gizmos (such as #10038, and ideas from #9400) will require custom configuration structs. Should there be a new custom config for every gizmo type, or should we group them together in a common configuration? (for example `EditorGizmoConfig`, or something more fine-grained) ## Changelog - Added `GizmoConfigStore` resource and `GizmoConfigGroup` trait - Added `init_gizmo_group` to `App` - Added early returns to gizmo drawing increasing performance when gizmos are disabled - Changed `GizmoConfig` and aabb gizmos to use new `GizmoConfigStore` - Changed `Gizmos` system parameter to use type based key to retrieve config - Changed resources and systems used for gizmo rendering to be generic over type based key - Changed examples (3d_gizmos, 2d_gizmos) to showcase new API ## Migration Guide - `GizmoConfig` is no longer a resource and has to be accessed through `GizmoConfigStore` resource. The default config group is `DefaultGizmoGroup`, but consider using your own custom config group if applicable. --------- Co-authored-by: Nicola Papale <nicopap@users.noreply.github.com>
2024-01-18 15:52:50 +00:00
[package]
name = "bevy_gizmos_macros"
Bump Version after Release (#14219) Bump version after release This PR has been auto-generated Co-authored-by: Bevy Auto Releaser <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: François Mockers <mockersf@gmail.com>
2024-07-08 12:54:08 +00:00
version = "0.15.0-dev"
Multiple Configurations for Gizmos (#10342) # Objective This PR aims to implement multiple configs for gizmos as discussed in #9187. ## Solution Configs for the new `GizmoConfigGroup`s are stored in a `GizmoConfigStore` resource and can be accesses using a type based key or iterated over. This type based key doubles as a standardized location where plugin authors can put their own configuration not covered by the standard `GizmoConfig` struct. For example the `AabbGizmoGroup` has a default color and toggle to show all AABBs. New configs can be registered using `app.init_gizmo_group::<T>()` during startup. When requesting the `Gizmos<T>` system parameter the generic type determines which config is used. The config structs are available through the `Gizmos` system parameter allowing for easy access while drawing your gizmos. Internally, resources and systems used for rendering (up to an including the extract system) are generic over the type based key and inserted on registering a new config. ## Alternatives The configs could be stored as components on entities with markers which would make better use of the ECS. I also implemented this approach ([here](https://github.com/jeliag/bevy/tree/gizmo-multiconf-comp)) and believe that the ergonomic benefits of a central config store outweigh the decreased use of the ECS. ## Unsafe Code Implementing system parameter by hand is unsafe but seems to be required to access the config store once and not on every gizmo draw function call. This is critical for performance. ~Is there a better way to do this?~ ## Future Work New gizmos (such as #10038, and ideas from #9400) will require custom configuration structs. Should there be a new custom config for every gizmo type, or should we group them together in a common configuration? (for example `EditorGizmoConfig`, or something more fine-grained) ## Changelog - Added `GizmoConfigStore` resource and `GizmoConfigGroup` trait - Added `init_gizmo_group` to `App` - Added early returns to gizmo drawing increasing performance when gizmos are disabled - Changed `GizmoConfig` and aabb gizmos to use new `GizmoConfigStore` - Changed `Gizmos` system parameter to use type based key to retrieve config - Changed resources and systems used for gizmo rendering to be generic over type based key - Changed examples (3d_gizmos, 2d_gizmos) to showcase new API ## Migration Guide - `GizmoConfig` is no longer a resource and has to be accessed through `GizmoConfigStore` resource. The default config group is `DefaultGizmoGroup`, but consider using your own custom config group if applicable. --------- Co-authored-by: Nicola Papale <nicopap@users.noreply.github.com>
2024-01-18 15:52:50 +00:00
edition = "2021"
description = "Derive implementations for bevy_gizmos"
homepage = "https://bevyengine.org"
repository = "https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy"
license = "MIT OR Apache-2.0"
keywords = ["bevy"]
[lib]
proc-macro = true
Add a `[lints]` entry for workspace members missing it (#11900) # Objective - Some workspace members do not inherit the global lints. ## Solution - Add a `[lints]` entry for all files returned by `rg --files-without-match -F "[lints]" **/Cargo.toml`, except the compile failure tests since these aren't part of the workspace. - Add some docstrings where needed. --------- Co-authored-by: Alice Cecile <alice.i.cecile@gmail.com>
2024-02-19 17:09:47 +00:00
Multiple Configurations for Gizmos (#10342) # Objective This PR aims to implement multiple configs for gizmos as discussed in #9187. ## Solution Configs for the new `GizmoConfigGroup`s are stored in a `GizmoConfigStore` resource and can be accesses using a type based key or iterated over. This type based key doubles as a standardized location where plugin authors can put their own configuration not covered by the standard `GizmoConfig` struct. For example the `AabbGizmoGroup` has a default color and toggle to show all AABBs. New configs can be registered using `app.init_gizmo_group::<T>()` during startup. When requesting the `Gizmos<T>` system parameter the generic type determines which config is used. The config structs are available through the `Gizmos` system parameter allowing for easy access while drawing your gizmos. Internally, resources and systems used for rendering (up to an including the extract system) are generic over the type based key and inserted on registering a new config. ## Alternatives The configs could be stored as components on entities with markers which would make better use of the ECS. I also implemented this approach ([here](https://github.com/jeliag/bevy/tree/gizmo-multiconf-comp)) and believe that the ergonomic benefits of a central config store outweigh the decreased use of the ECS. ## Unsafe Code Implementing system parameter by hand is unsafe but seems to be required to access the config store once and not on every gizmo draw function call. This is critical for performance. ~Is there a better way to do this?~ ## Future Work New gizmos (such as #10038, and ideas from #9400) will require custom configuration structs. Should there be a new custom config for every gizmo type, or should we group them together in a common configuration? (for example `EditorGizmoConfig`, or something more fine-grained) ## Changelog - Added `GizmoConfigStore` resource and `GizmoConfigGroup` trait - Added `init_gizmo_group` to `App` - Added early returns to gizmo drawing increasing performance when gizmos are disabled - Changed `GizmoConfig` and aabb gizmos to use new `GizmoConfigStore` - Changed `Gizmos` system parameter to use type based key to retrieve config - Changed resources and systems used for gizmo rendering to be generic over type based key - Changed examples (3d_gizmos, 2d_gizmos) to showcase new API ## Migration Guide - `GizmoConfig` is no longer a resource and has to be accessed through `GizmoConfigStore` resource. The default config group is `DefaultGizmoGroup`, but consider using your own custom config group if applicable. --------- Co-authored-by: Nicola Papale <nicopap@users.noreply.github.com>
2024-01-18 15:52:50 +00:00
[dependencies]
Bump Version after Release (#14219) Bump version after release This PR has been auto-generated Co-authored-by: Bevy Auto Releaser <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: François Mockers <mockersf@gmail.com>
2024-07-08 12:54:08 +00:00
bevy_macro_utils = { path = "../../bevy_macro_utils", version = "0.15.0-dev" }
Multiple Configurations for Gizmos (#10342) # Objective This PR aims to implement multiple configs for gizmos as discussed in #9187. ## Solution Configs for the new `GizmoConfigGroup`s are stored in a `GizmoConfigStore` resource and can be accesses using a type based key or iterated over. This type based key doubles as a standardized location where plugin authors can put their own configuration not covered by the standard `GizmoConfig` struct. For example the `AabbGizmoGroup` has a default color and toggle to show all AABBs. New configs can be registered using `app.init_gizmo_group::<T>()` during startup. When requesting the `Gizmos<T>` system parameter the generic type determines which config is used. The config structs are available through the `Gizmos` system parameter allowing for easy access while drawing your gizmos. Internally, resources and systems used for rendering (up to an including the extract system) are generic over the type based key and inserted on registering a new config. ## Alternatives The configs could be stored as components on entities with markers which would make better use of the ECS. I also implemented this approach ([here](https://github.com/jeliag/bevy/tree/gizmo-multiconf-comp)) and believe that the ergonomic benefits of a central config store outweigh the decreased use of the ECS. ## Unsafe Code Implementing system parameter by hand is unsafe but seems to be required to access the config store once and not on every gizmo draw function call. This is critical for performance. ~Is there a better way to do this?~ ## Future Work New gizmos (such as #10038, and ideas from #9400) will require custom configuration structs. Should there be a new custom config for every gizmo type, or should we group them together in a common configuration? (for example `EditorGizmoConfig`, or something more fine-grained) ## Changelog - Added `GizmoConfigStore` resource and `GizmoConfigGroup` trait - Added `init_gizmo_group` to `App` - Added early returns to gizmo drawing increasing performance when gizmos are disabled - Changed `GizmoConfig` and aabb gizmos to use new `GizmoConfigStore` - Changed `Gizmos` system parameter to use type based key to retrieve config - Changed resources and systems used for gizmo rendering to be generic over type based key - Changed examples (3d_gizmos, 2d_gizmos) to showcase new API ## Migration Guide - `GizmoConfig` is no longer a resource and has to be accessed through `GizmoConfigStore` resource. The default config group is `DefaultGizmoGroup`, but consider using your own custom config group if applicable. --------- Co-authored-by: Nicola Papale <nicopap@users.noreply.github.com>
2024-01-18 15:52:50 +00:00
syn = "2.0"
proc-macro2 = "1.0"
quote = "1.0"
Make `feature(doc_auto_cfg)` work (#12642) # Objective - In #12366 `![cfg_attr(docsrs, feature(doc_auto_cfg))] `was added. But to apply it it needs `--cfg=docsrs` in rustdoc-args. ## Solution - Apply `--cfg=docsrs` to all crates and CI. I also added `[package.metadata.docs.rs]` to all crates to avoid adding code behind a feature and forget adding the metadata. Before: ![Screenshot 2024-03-22 at 00 51 57](https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/assets/104745335/6a9dfdaa-8710-4784-852b-5f9b74e3522c) After: ![Screenshot 2024-03-22 at 00 51 32](https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/assets/104745335/c5bd6d8e-8ddb-45b3-b844-5ecf9f88961c)
2024-03-23 02:22:52 +00:00
[lints]
workspace = true
[package.metadata.docs.rs]
Generate links to definition in source code pages on docs.rs and dev-docs.bevyengine.org (#12965) # Objective - Fix issue #2611 ## Solution - Add `--generate-link-to-definition` to all the `rustdoc-args` arrays in the `Cargo.toml`s (for docs.rs) - Add `--generate-link-to-definition` to the `RUSTDOCFLAGS` environment variable in the docs workflow (for dev-docs.bevyengine.org) - Document all the workspace crates in the docs workflow (needed because otherwise only the source code of the `bevy` package will be included, making the argument useless) - I think this also fixes #3662, since it fixes the bug on dev-docs.bevyengine.org, while on docs.rs it has been fixed for a while on their side. --- ## Changelog - The source code viewer on docs.rs now includes links to the definitions.
2024-07-29 23:10:16 +00:00
rustdoc-args = ["-Zunstable-options", "--generate-link-to-definition"]
Make `feature(doc_auto_cfg)` work (#12642) # Objective - In #12366 `![cfg_attr(docsrs, feature(doc_auto_cfg))] `was added. But to apply it it needs `--cfg=docsrs` in rustdoc-args. ## Solution - Apply `--cfg=docsrs` to all crates and CI. I also added `[package.metadata.docs.rs]` to all crates to avoid adding code behind a feature and forget adding the metadata. Before: ![Screenshot 2024-03-22 at 00 51 57](https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/assets/104745335/6a9dfdaa-8710-4784-852b-5f9b74e3522c) After: ![Screenshot 2024-03-22 at 00 51 32](https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/assets/104745335/c5bd6d8e-8ddb-45b3-b844-5ecf9f88961c)
2024-03-23 02:22:52 +00:00
all-features = true
Reference in a new issue Copy permalink