bevy_scene: Add `SceneFilter` (#6793)
# Objective
Currently, `DynamicScene`s extract all components listed in the given
(or the world's) type registry. This acts as a quasi-filter of sorts.
However, it can be troublesome to use effectively and lacks decent
control.
For example, say you need to serialize only the following component over
the network:
```rust
#[derive(Reflect, Component, Default)]
#[reflect(Component)]
struct NPC {
name: Option<String>
}
```
To do this, you'd need to:
1. Create a new `AppTypeRegistry`
2. Register `NPC`
3. Register `Option<String>`
If we skip Step 3, then the entire scene might fail to serialize as
`Option<String>` requires registration.
Not only is this annoying and easy to forget, but it can leave users
with an impossible task: serializing a third-party type that contains
private types.
Generally, the third-party crate will register their private types
within a plugin so the user doesn't need to do it themselves. However,
this means we are now unable to serialize _just_ that type— we're forced
to allow everything!
## Solution
Add the `SceneFilter` enum for filtering components to extract.
This filter can be used to optionally allow or deny entire sets of
components/resources. With the `DynamicSceneBuilder`, users have more
control over how their `DynamicScene`s are built.
To only serialize a subset of components, use the `allow` method:
```rust
let scene = builder
.allow::<ComponentA>()
.allow::<ComponentB>()
.extract_entity(entity)
.build();
```
To serialize everything _but_ a subset of components, use the `deny`
method:
```rust
let scene = builder
.deny::<ComponentA>()
.deny::<ComponentB>()
.extract_entity(entity)
.build();
```
Or create a custom filter:
```rust
let components = HashSet::from([type_id]);
let filter = SceneFilter::Allowlist(components);
// let filter = SceneFilter::Denylist(components);
let scene = builder
.with_filter(Some(filter))
.extract_entity(entity)
.build();
```
Similar operations exist for resources:
<details>
<summary>View Resource Methods</summary>
To only serialize a subset of resources, use the `allow_resource`
method:
```rust
let scene = builder
.allow_resource::<ResourceA>()
.extract_resources()
.build();
```
To serialize everything _but_ a subset of resources, use the
`deny_resource` method:
```rust
let scene = builder
.deny_resource::<ResourceA>()
.extract_resources()
.build();
```
Or create a custom filter:
```rust
let resources = HashSet::from([type_id]);
let filter = SceneFilter::Allowlist(resources);
// let filter = SceneFilter::Denylist(resources);
let scene = builder
.with_resource_filter(Some(filter))
.extract_resources()
.build();
```
</details>
### Open Questions
- [x] ~~`allow` and `deny` are mutually exclusive. Currently, they
overwrite each other. Should this instead be a panic?~~ Took @soqb's
suggestion and made it so that the opposing method simply removes that
type from the list.
- [x] ~~`DynamicSceneBuilder` extracts entity data as soon as
`extract_entity`/`extract_entities` is called. Should this behavior
instead be moved to the `build` method to prevent ordering mixups (e.g.
`.allow::<Foo>().extract_entity(entity)` vs
`.extract_entity(entity).allow::<Foo>()`)? The tradeoff would be
iterating over the given entities twice: once at extraction and again at
build.~~ Based on the feedback from @Testare it sounds like it might be
better to just keep the current functionality (if anything we can open a
separate PR that adds deferred methods for extraction, so the
choice/performance hit is up to the user).
- [ ] An alternative might be to remove the filter from
`DynamicSceneBuilder` and have it as a separate parameter to the
extraction methods (either in the existing ones or as added
`extract_entity_with_filter`-type methods). Is this preferable?
- [x] ~~Should we include constructors that include common types to
allow/deny? For example, a `SceneFilter::standard_allowlist` that
includes things like `Parent` and `Children`?~~ Consensus suggests we
should. I may split this out into a followup PR, though.
- [x] ~~Should we add the ability to remove types from the filter
regardless of whether an allowlist or denylist (e.g.
`filter.remove::<Foo>()`)?~~ See the first list item
- [x] ~~Should `SceneFilter` be an enum? Would it make more sense as a
struct that contains an `is_denylist` boolean?~~ With the added
`SceneFilter::None` state (replacing the need to wrap in an `Option` or
rely on an empty `Denylist`), it seems an enum is better suited now
- [x] ~~Bikeshed: Do we like the naming convention? Should we instead
use `include`/`exclude` terminology?~~ Sounds like we're sticking with
`allow`/`deny`!
- [x] ~~Does this feature need a new example? Do we simply include it in
the existing one (maybe even as a comment?)? Should this be done in a
followup PR instead?~~ Example will be added in a followup PR
### Followup Tasks
- [ ] Add a dedicated `SceneFilter` example
- [ ] Possibly add default types to the filter (e.g. deny things like
`ComputedVisibility`, allow `Parent`, etc)
---
## Changelog
- Added the `SceneFilter` enum for filtering components and resources
when building a `DynamicScene`
- Added methods:
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::with_filter`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::allow`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::deny`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::allow_all`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::deny_all`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::with_resource_filter`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::allow_resource`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::deny_resource`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::allow_all_resources`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::deny_all_resources`
- Removed methods:
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::from_world_with_type_registry`
- `DynamicScene::from_scene` and `DynamicScene::from_world` no longer
require an `AppTypeRegistry` reference
## Migration Guide
- `DynamicScene::from_scene` and `DynamicScene::from_world` no longer
require an `AppTypeRegistry` reference:
```rust
// OLD
let registry = world.resource::<AppTypeRegistry>();
let dynamic_scene = DynamicScene::from_world(&world, registry);
// let dynamic_scene = DynamicScene::from_scene(&scene, registry);
// NEW
let dynamic_scene = DynamicScene::from_world(&world);
// let dynamic_scene = DynamicScene::from_scene(&scene);
```
- Removed `DynamicSceneBuilder::from_world_with_type_registry`. Now the
registry is automatically taken from the given world:
```rust
// OLD
let registry = world.resource::<AppTypeRegistry>();
let builder = DynamicSceneBuilder::from_world_with_type_registry(&world,
registry);
// NEW
let builder = DynamicSceneBuilder::from_world(&world);
```
2023-07-06 21:04:26 +00:00
|
|
|
use crate::{DynamicEntity, DynamicScene, SceneFilter};
|
2024-09-27 00:59:59 +00:00
|
|
|
use alloc::collections::BTreeMap;
|
(De) serialize resources in scenes (#6846)
# Objective
Co-Authored-By: davier
[bricedavier@gmail.com](mailto:bricedavier@gmail.com)
Fixes #3576.
Adds a `resources` field in scene serialization data to allow
de/serializing resources that have reflection enabled.
## Solution
Most of this code is taken from a previous closed PR:
https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/pull/3580. Most of the credit goes to
@Davier , what I did was mostly getting it to work on the latest main
branch of Bevy, along with adding a few asserts in the currently
existing tests to be sure everything is working properly.
This PR changes the scene format to include resources in this way:
```
(
resources: {
// List of resources here, keyed by resource type name.
},
entities: [
// Previous scene format here
],
)
```
An example taken from the tests:
```
(
resources: {
"bevy_scene::serde::tests::MyResource": (
foo: 123,
),
},
entities: {
// Previous scene format here
},
)
```
For this, a `resources` fields has been added on the `DynamicScene` and
the `DynamicSceneBuilder` structs. The latter now also has a method
named `extract_resources` to properly extract the existing resources
registered in the local type registry, in a similar way to
`extract_entities`.
---
## Changelog
Added: Reflect resources registered in the type registry used by dynamic
scenes will now be properly de/serialized in scene data.
## Migration Guide
Since the scene format has been changed, the user may not be able to use
scenes saved prior to this PR due to the `resources` scene field being
missing. ~~To preserve backwards compatibility, I will try to make the
`resources` fully optional so that old scenes can be loaded without
issue.~~
## TODOs
- [x] I may have to update a few doc blocks still referring to dynamic
scenes as mere container of entities, since they now include resources
as well.
- [x] ~~I want to make the `resources` key optional, as specified in the
Migration Guide, so that old scenes will be compatible with this
change.~~ Since this would only be trivial for ron format, I think it
might be better to consider it in a separate PR/discussion to figure out
if it could be done for binary serialization too.
- [x] I suppose it might be a good idea to add a resources in the scene
example so that users will quickly notice they can serialize resources
just like entities.
---------
Co-authored-by: Carter Anderson <mcanders1@gmail.com>
2023-03-20 21:17:02 +00:00
|
|
|
use bevy_ecs::{
|
2024-09-24 11:42:59 +00:00
|
|
|
component::{Component, ComponentId},
|
(De) serialize resources in scenes (#6846)
# Objective
Co-Authored-By: davier
[bricedavier@gmail.com](mailto:bricedavier@gmail.com)
Fixes #3576.
Adds a `resources` field in scene serialization data to allow
de/serializing resources that have reflection enabled.
## Solution
Most of this code is taken from a previous closed PR:
https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/pull/3580. Most of the credit goes to
@Davier , what I did was mostly getting it to work on the latest main
branch of Bevy, along with adding a few asserts in the currently
existing tests to be sure everything is working properly.
This PR changes the scene format to include resources in this way:
```
(
resources: {
// List of resources here, keyed by resource type name.
},
entities: [
// Previous scene format here
],
)
```
An example taken from the tests:
```
(
resources: {
"bevy_scene::serde::tests::MyResource": (
foo: 123,
),
},
entities: {
// Previous scene format here
},
)
```
For this, a `resources` fields has been added on the `DynamicScene` and
the `DynamicSceneBuilder` structs. The latter now also has a method
named `extract_resources` to properly extract the existing resources
registered in the local type registry, in a similar way to
`extract_entities`.
---
## Changelog
Added: Reflect resources registered in the type registry used by dynamic
scenes will now be properly de/serialized in scene data.
## Migration Guide
Since the scene format has been changed, the user may not be able to use
scenes saved prior to this PR due to the `resources` scene field being
missing. ~~To preserve backwards compatibility, I will try to make the
`resources` fully optional so that old scenes can be loaded without
issue.~~
## TODOs
- [x] I may have to update a few doc blocks still referring to dynamic
scenes as mere container of entities, since they now include resources
as well.
- [x] ~~I want to make the `resources` key optional, as specified in the
Migration Guide, so that old scenes will be compatible with this
change.~~ Since this would only be trivial for ron format, I think it
might be better to consider it in a separate PR/discussion to figure out
if it could be done for binary serialization too.
- [x] I suppose it might be a good idea to add a resources in the scene
example so that users will quickly notice they can serialize resources
just like entities.
---------
Co-authored-by: Carter Anderson <mcanders1@gmail.com>
2023-03-20 21:17:02 +00:00
|
|
|
prelude::Entity,
|
2023-06-21 17:25:01 +00:00
|
|
|
reflect::{AppTypeRegistry, ReflectComponent, ReflectResource},
|
2024-09-24 11:42:59 +00:00
|
|
|
system::Resource,
|
(De) serialize resources in scenes (#6846)
# Objective
Co-Authored-By: davier
[bricedavier@gmail.com](mailto:bricedavier@gmail.com)
Fixes #3576.
Adds a `resources` field in scene serialization data to allow
de/serializing resources that have reflection enabled.
## Solution
Most of this code is taken from a previous closed PR:
https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/pull/3580. Most of the credit goes to
@Davier , what I did was mostly getting it to work on the latest main
branch of Bevy, along with adding a few asserts in the currently
existing tests to be sure everything is working properly.
This PR changes the scene format to include resources in this way:
```
(
resources: {
// List of resources here, keyed by resource type name.
},
entities: [
// Previous scene format here
],
)
```
An example taken from the tests:
```
(
resources: {
"bevy_scene::serde::tests::MyResource": (
foo: 123,
),
},
entities: {
// Previous scene format here
},
)
```
For this, a `resources` fields has been added on the `DynamicScene` and
the `DynamicSceneBuilder` structs. The latter now also has a method
named `extract_resources` to properly extract the existing resources
registered in the local type registry, in a similar way to
`extract_entities`.
---
## Changelog
Added: Reflect resources registered in the type registry used by dynamic
scenes will now be properly de/serialized in scene data.
## Migration Guide
Since the scene format has been changed, the user may not be able to use
scenes saved prior to this PR due to the `resources` scene field being
missing. ~~To preserve backwards compatibility, I will try to make the
`resources` fully optional so that old scenes can be loaded without
issue.~~
## TODOs
- [x] I may have to update a few doc blocks still referring to dynamic
scenes as mere container of entities, since they now include resources
as well.
- [x] ~~I want to make the `resources` key optional, as specified in the
Migration Guide, so that old scenes will be compatible with this
change.~~ Since this would only be trivial for ron format, I think it
might be better to consider it in a separate PR/discussion to figure out
if it could be done for binary serialization too.
- [x] I suppose it might be a good idea to add a resources in the scene
example so that users will quickly notice they can serialize resources
just like entities.
---------
Co-authored-by: Carter Anderson <mcanders1@gmail.com>
2023-03-20 21:17:02 +00:00
|
|
|
world::World,
|
|
|
|
};
|
Use `FromReflect` when extracting entities in dynamic scenes (#15174)
# Objective
Fix #10284.
## Solution
When `DynamicSceneBuilder` extracts entities, they are cloned via
`PartialReflect::clone_value`, making them into dynamic versions of the
original components. This loses any custom `ReflectSerialize` type data.
Dynamic scenes are deserialized with the original types, not the dynamic
versions, and so any component with a custom serialize may fail. In this
case `Rect` and `Vec2`. The dynamic version includes the field names 'x'
and 'y' but the `Serialize` impl doesn't, hence the "expect float"
error.
The solution here: Instead of using `clone_value` to clone the
components, `FromReflect` clones and retains the original information
needed to serialize with any custom `Serialize` impls. I think using
something like `reflect_clone` from
(https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/pull/13432) might make this more
efficient.
I also did the same when deserializing dynamic scenes to appease some of
the round-trip tests which use `ReflectPartialEq`, which requires the
types be the same and not a unique/proxy pair. I'm not sure it's
otherwise necessary. Maybe this would also be more efficient when
spawning dynamic scenes with `reflect_clone` instead of `FromReflect`
again?
An alternative solution would be to fall back to the dynamic version
when deserializing `DynamicScene`s if the custom version fails. I think
that's possible. Or maybe simply always deserializing via the dynamic
route for dynamic scenes?
## Testing
This example is similar to the original test case in #10284:
``` rust
#![allow(missing_docs)]
use bevy::{prelude::*, scene::SceneInstanceReady};
fn main() {
App::new()
.add_plugins(DefaultPlugins)
.add_systems(Startup, (save, load).chain())
.observe(check)
.run();
}
static SAVEGAME_SAVE_PATH: &str = "savegame.scn.ron";
fn save(world: &mut World) {
let entity = world.spawn(OrthographicProjection::default()).id();
let scene = DynamicSceneBuilder::from_world(world)
.extract_entity(entity)
.build();
if let Some(registry) = world.get_resource::<AppTypeRegistry>() {
let registry = registry.read();
let serialized_scene = scene.serialize(®istry).unwrap();
// println!("{}", serialized_scene);
std::fs::write(format!("assets/{SAVEGAME_SAVE_PATH}"), serialized_scene).unwrap();
}
world.entity_mut(entity).despawn_recursive();
}
fn load(mut commands: Commands, asset_server: Res<AssetServer>) {
commands.spawn(DynamicSceneBundle {
scene: asset_server.load(SAVEGAME_SAVE_PATH),
..default()
});
}
fn check(_trigger: Trigger<SceneInstanceReady>, query: Query<&OrthographicProjection>) {
dbg!(query.single());
}
```
## Migration Guide
The `DynamicScene` format is changed to use custom serialize impls so
old scene files will need updating:
Old:
```ron
(
resources: {},
entities: {
4294967299: (
components: {
"bevy_render::camera::projection::OrthographicProjection": (
near: 0.0,
far: 1000.0,
viewport_origin: (
x: 0.5,
y: 0.5,
),
scaling_mode: WindowSize(1.0),
scale: 1.0,
area: (
min: (
x: -1.0,
y: -1.0,
),
max: (
x: 1.0,
y: 1.0,
),
),
),
},
),
},
)
```
New:
```ron
(
resources: {},
entities: {
4294967299: (
components: {
"bevy_render::camera::projection::OrthographicProjection": (
near: 0.0,
far: 1000.0,
viewport_origin: (0.5, 0.5),
scaling_mode: WindowSize(1.0),
scale: 1.0,
area: (
min: (-1.0, -1.0),
max: (1.0, 1.0),
),
),
},
),
},
)
```
---------
Co-authored-by: Gino Valente <49806985+MrGVSV@users.noreply.github.com>
2024-09-15 14:33:39 +00:00
|
|
|
use bevy_reflect::{PartialReflect, ReflectFromReflect};
|
2022-10-27 23:38:03 +00:00
|
|
|
use bevy_utils::default;
|
2022-10-12 01:48:16 +00:00
|
|
|
|
(De) serialize resources in scenes (#6846)
# Objective
Co-Authored-By: davier
[bricedavier@gmail.com](mailto:bricedavier@gmail.com)
Fixes #3576.
Adds a `resources` field in scene serialization data to allow
de/serializing resources that have reflection enabled.
## Solution
Most of this code is taken from a previous closed PR:
https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/pull/3580. Most of the credit goes to
@Davier , what I did was mostly getting it to work on the latest main
branch of Bevy, along with adding a few asserts in the currently
existing tests to be sure everything is working properly.
This PR changes the scene format to include resources in this way:
```
(
resources: {
// List of resources here, keyed by resource type name.
},
entities: [
// Previous scene format here
],
)
```
An example taken from the tests:
```
(
resources: {
"bevy_scene::serde::tests::MyResource": (
foo: 123,
),
},
entities: {
// Previous scene format here
},
)
```
For this, a `resources` fields has been added on the `DynamicScene` and
the `DynamicSceneBuilder` structs. The latter now also has a method
named `extract_resources` to properly extract the existing resources
registered in the local type registry, in a similar way to
`extract_entities`.
---
## Changelog
Added: Reflect resources registered in the type registry used by dynamic
scenes will now be properly de/serialized in scene data.
## Migration Guide
Since the scene format has been changed, the user may not be able to use
scenes saved prior to this PR due to the `resources` scene field being
missing. ~~To preserve backwards compatibility, I will try to make the
`resources` fully optional so that old scenes can be loaded without
issue.~~
## TODOs
- [x] I may have to update a few doc blocks still referring to dynamic
scenes as mere container of entities, since they now include resources
as well.
- [x] ~~I want to make the `resources` key optional, as specified in the
Migration Guide, so that old scenes will be compatible with this
change.~~ Since this would only be trivial for ron format, I think it
might be better to consider it in a separate PR/discussion to figure out
if it could be done for binary serialization too.
- [x] I suppose it might be a good idea to add a resources in the scene
example so that users will quickly notice they can serialize resources
just like entities.
---------
Co-authored-by: Carter Anderson <mcanders1@gmail.com>
2023-03-20 21:17:02 +00:00
|
|
|
/// A [`DynamicScene`] builder, used to build a scene from a [`World`] by extracting some entities and resources.
|
2022-10-12 01:48:16 +00:00
|
|
|
///
|
bevy_scene: Add `SceneFilter` (#6793)
# Objective
Currently, `DynamicScene`s extract all components listed in the given
(or the world's) type registry. This acts as a quasi-filter of sorts.
However, it can be troublesome to use effectively and lacks decent
control.
For example, say you need to serialize only the following component over
the network:
```rust
#[derive(Reflect, Component, Default)]
#[reflect(Component)]
struct NPC {
name: Option<String>
}
```
To do this, you'd need to:
1. Create a new `AppTypeRegistry`
2. Register `NPC`
3. Register `Option<String>`
If we skip Step 3, then the entire scene might fail to serialize as
`Option<String>` requires registration.
Not only is this annoying and easy to forget, but it can leave users
with an impossible task: serializing a third-party type that contains
private types.
Generally, the third-party crate will register their private types
within a plugin so the user doesn't need to do it themselves. However,
this means we are now unable to serialize _just_ that type— we're forced
to allow everything!
## Solution
Add the `SceneFilter` enum for filtering components to extract.
This filter can be used to optionally allow or deny entire sets of
components/resources. With the `DynamicSceneBuilder`, users have more
control over how their `DynamicScene`s are built.
To only serialize a subset of components, use the `allow` method:
```rust
let scene = builder
.allow::<ComponentA>()
.allow::<ComponentB>()
.extract_entity(entity)
.build();
```
To serialize everything _but_ a subset of components, use the `deny`
method:
```rust
let scene = builder
.deny::<ComponentA>()
.deny::<ComponentB>()
.extract_entity(entity)
.build();
```
Or create a custom filter:
```rust
let components = HashSet::from([type_id]);
let filter = SceneFilter::Allowlist(components);
// let filter = SceneFilter::Denylist(components);
let scene = builder
.with_filter(Some(filter))
.extract_entity(entity)
.build();
```
Similar operations exist for resources:
<details>
<summary>View Resource Methods</summary>
To only serialize a subset of resources, use the `allow_resource`
method:
```rust
let scene = builder
.allow_resource::<ResourceA>()
.extract_resources()
.build();
```
To serialize everything _but_ a subset of resources, use the
`deny_resource` method:
```rust
let scene = builder
.deny_resource::<ResourceA>()
.extract_resources()
.build();
```
Or create a custom filter:
```rust
let resources = HashSet::from([type_id]);
let filter = SceneFilter::Allowlist(resources);
// let filter = SceneFilter::Denylist(resources);
let scene = builder
.with_resource_filter(Some(filter))
.extract_resources()
.build();
```
</details>
### Open Questions
- [x] ~~`allow` and `deny` are mutually exclusive. Currently, they
overwrite each other. Should this instead be a panic?~~ Took @soqb's
suggestion and made it so that the opposing method simply removes that
type from the list.
- [x] ~~`DynamicSceneBuilder` extracts entity data as soon as
`extract_entity`/`extract_entities` is called. Should this behavior
instead be moved to the `build` method to prevent ordering mixups (e.g.
`.allow::<Foo>().extract_entity(entity)` vs
`.extract_entity(entity).allow::<Foo>()`)? The tradeoff would be
iterating over the given entities twice: once at extraction and again at
build.~~ Based on the feedback from @Testare it sounds like it might be
better to just keep the current functionality (if anything we can open a
separate PR that adds deferred methods for extraction, so the
choice/performance hit is up to the user).
- [ ] An alternative might be to remove the filter from
`DynamicSceneBuilder` and have it as a separate parameter to the
extraction methods (either in the existing ones or as added
`extract_entity_with_filter`-type methods). Is this preferable?
- [x] ~~Should we include constructors that include common types to
allow/deny? For example, a `SceneFilter::standard_allowlist` that
includes things like `Parent` and `Children`?~~ Consensus suggests we
should. I may split this out into a followup PR, though.
- [x] ~~Should we add the ability to remove types from the filter
regardless of whether an allowlist or denylist (e.g.
`filter.remove::<Foo>()`)?~~ See the first list item
- [x] ~~Should `SceneFilter` be an enum? Would it make more sense as a
struct that contains an `is_denylist` boolean?~~ With the added
`SceneFilter::None` state (replacing the need to wrap in an `Option` or
rely on an empty `Denylist`), it seems an enum is better suited now
- [x] ~~Bikeshed: Do we like the naming convention? Should we instead
use `include`/`exclude` terminology?~~ Sounds like we're sticking with
`allow`/`deny`!
- [x] ~~Does this feature need a new example? Do we simply include it in
the existing one (maybe even as a comment?)? Should this be done in a
followup PR instead?~~ Example will be added in a followup PR
### Followup Tasks
- [ ] Add a dedicated `SceneFilter` example
- [ ] Possibly add default types to the filter (e.g. deny things like
`ComputedVisibility`, allow `Parent`, etc)
---
## Changelog
- Added the `SceneFilter` enum for filtering components and resources
when building a `DynamicScene`
- Added methods:
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::with_filter`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::allow`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::deny`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::allow_all`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::deny_all`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::with_resource_filter`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::allow_resource`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::deny_resource`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::allow_all_resources`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::deny_all_resources`
- Removed methods:
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::from_world_with_type_registry`
- `DynamicScene::from_scene` and `DynamicScene::from_world` no longer
require an `AppTypeRegistry` reference
## Migration Guide
- `DynamicScene::from_scene` and `DynamicScene::from_world` no longer
require an `AppTypeRegistry` reference:
```rust
// OLD
let registry = world.resource::<AppTypeRegistry>();
let dynamic_scene = DynamicScene::from_world(&world, registry);
// let dynamic_scene = DynamicScene::from_scene(&scene, registry);
// NEW
let dynamic_scene = DynamicScene::from_world(&world);
// let dynamic_scene = DynamicScene::from_scene(&scene);
```
- Removed `DynamicSceneBuilder::from_world_with_type_registry`. Now the
registry is automatically taken from the given world:
```rust
// OLD
let registry = world.resource::<AppTypeRegistry>();
let builder = DynamicSceneBuilder::from_world_with_type_registry(&world,
registry);
// NEW
let builder = DynamicSceneBuilder::from_world(&world);
```
2023-07-06 21:04:26 +00:00
|
|
|
/// # Component Extraction
|
|
|
|
///
|
|
|
|
/// By default, all components registered with [`ReflectComponent`] type data in a world's [`AppTypeRegistry`] will be extracted.
|
|
|
|
/// (this type data is added automatically during registration if [`Reflect`] is derived with the `#[reflect(Component)]` attribute).
|
2024-09-15 14:37:32 +00:00
|
|
|
/// This can be changed by [specifying a filter](DynamicSceneBuilder::with_component_filter) or by explicitly
|
|
|
|
/// [allowing](DynamicSceneBuilder::allow_component)/[denying](DynamicSceneBuilder::deny_component) certain components.
|
bevy_scene: Add `SceneFilter` (#6793)
# Objective
Currently, `DynamicScene`s extract all components listed in the given
(or the world's) type registry. This acts as a quasi-filter of sorts.
However, it can be troublesome to use effectively and lacks decent
control.
For example, say you need to serialize only the following component over
the network:
```rust
#[derive(Reflect, Component, Default)]
#[reflect(Component)]
struct NPC {
name: Option<String>
}
```
To do this, you'd need to:
1. Create a new `AppTypeRegistry`
2. Register `NPC`
3. Register `Option<String>`
If we skip Step 3, then the entire scene might fail to serialize as
`Option<String>` requires registration.
Not only is this annoying and easy to forget, but it can leave users
with an impossible task: serializing a third-party type that contains
private types.
Generally, the third-party crate will register their private types
within a plugin so the user doesn't need to do it themselves. However,
this means we are now unable to serialize _just_ that type— we're forced
to allow everything!
## Solution
Add the `SceneFilter` enum for filtering components to extract.
This filter can be used to optionally allow or deny entire sets of
components/resources. With the `DynamicSceneBuilder`, users have more
control over how their `DynamicScene`s are built.
To only serialize a subset of components, use the `allow` method:
```rust
let scene = builder
.allow::<ComponentA>()
.allow::<ComponentB>()
.extract_entity(entity)
.build();
```
To serialize everything _but_ a subset of components, use the `deny`
method:
```rust
let scene = builder
.deny::<ComponentA>()
.deny::<ComponentB>()
.extract_entity(entity)
.build();
```
Or create a custom filter:
```rust
let components = HashSet::from([type_id]);
let filter = SceneFilter::Allowlist(components);
// let filter = SceneFilter::Denylist(components);
let scene = builder
.with_filter(Some(filter))
.extract_entity(entity)
.build();
```
Similar operations exist for resources:
<details>
<summary>View Resource Methods</summary>
To only serialize a subset of resources, use the `allow_resource`
method:
```rust
let scene = builder
.allow_resource::<ResourceA>()
.extract_resources()
.build();
```
To serialize everything _but_ a subset of resources, use the
`deny_resource` method:
```rust
let scene = builder
.deny_resource::<ResourceA>()
.extract_resources()
.build();
```
Or create a custom filter:
```rust
let resources = HashSet::from([type_id]);
let filter = SceneFilter::Allowlist(resources);
// let filter = SceneFilter::Denylist(resources);
let scene = builder
.with_resource_filter(Some(filter))
.extract_resources()
.build();
```
</details>
### Open Questions
- [x] ~~`allow` and `deny` are mutually exclusive. Currently, they
overwrite each other. Should this instead be a panic?~~ Took @soqb's
suggestion and made it so that the opposing method simply removes that
type from the list.
- [x] ~~`DynamicSceneBuilder` extracts entity data as soon as
`extract_entity`/`extract_entities` is called. Should this behavior
instead be moved to the `build` method to prevent ordering mixups (e.g.
`.allow::<Foo>().extract_entity(entity)` vs
`.extract_entity(entity).allow::<Foo>()`)? The tradeoff would be
iterating over the given entities twice: once at extraction and again at
build.~~ Based on the feedback from @Testare it sounds like it might be
better to just keep the current functionality (if anything we can open a
separate PR that adds deferred methods for extraction, so the
choice/performance hit is up to the user).
- [ ] An alternative might be to remove the filter from
`DynamicSceneBuilder` and have it as a separate parameter to the
extraction methods (either in the existing ones or as added
`extract_entity_with_filter`-type methods). Is this preferable?
- [x] ~~Should we include constructors that include common types to
allow/deny? For example, a `SceneFilter::standard_allowlist` that
includes things like `Parent` and `Children`?~~ Consensus suggests we
should. I may split this out into a followup PR, though.
- [x] ~~Should we add the ability to remove types from the filter
regardless of whether an allowlist or denylist (e.g.
`filter.remove::<Foo>()`)?~~ See the first list item
- [x] ~~Should `SceneFilter` be an enum? Would it make more sense as a
struct that contains an `is_denylist` boolean?~~ With the added
`SceneFilter::None` state (replacing the need to wrap in an `Option` or
rely on an empty `Denylist`), it seems an enum is better suited now
- [x] ~~Bikeshed: Do we like the naming convention? Should we instead
use `include`/`exclude` terminology?~~ Sounds like we're sticking with
`allow`/`deny`!
- [x] ~~Does this feature need a new example? Do we simply include it in
the existing one (maybe even as a comment?)? Should this be done in a
followup PR instead?~~ Example will be added in a followup PR
### Followup Tasks
- [ ] Add a dedicated `SceneFilter` example
- [ ] Possibly add default types to the filter (e.g. deny things like
`ComputedVisibility`, allow `Parent`, etc)
---
## Changelog
- Added the `SceneFilter` enum for filtering components and resources
when building a `DynamicScene`
- Added methods:
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::with_filter`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::allow`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::deny`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::allow_all`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::deny_all`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::with_resource_filter`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::allow_resource`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::deny_resource`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::allow_all_resources`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::deny_all_resources`
- Removed methods:
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::from_world_with_type_registry`
- `DynamicScene::from_scene` and `DynamicScene::from_world` no longer
require an `AppTypeRegistry` reference
## Migration Guide
- `DynamicScene::from_scene` and `DynamicScene::from_world` no longer
require an `AppTypeRegistry` reference:
```rust
// OLD
let registry = world.resource::<AppTypeRegistry>();
let dynamic_scene = DynamicScene::from_world(&world, registry);
// let dynamic_scene = DynamicScene::from_scene(&scene, registry);
// NEW
let dynamic_scene = DynamicScene::from_world(&world);
// let dynamic_scene = DynamicScene::from_scene(&scene);
```
- Removed `DynamicSceneBuilder::from_world_with_type_registry`. Now the
registry is automatically taken from the given world:
```rust
// OLD
let registry = world.resource::<AppTypeRegistry>();
let builder = DynamicSceneBuilder::from_world_with_type_registry(&world,
registry);
// NEW
let builder = DynamicSceneBuilder::from_world(&world);
```
2023-07-06 21:04:26 +00:00
|
|
|
///
|
|
|
|
/// Extraction happens immediately and uses the filter as it exists during the time of extraction.
|
|
|
|
///
|
|
|
|
/// # Resource Extraction
|
|
|
|
///
|
|
|
|
/// By default, all resources registered with [`ReflectResource`] type data in a world's [`AppTypeRegistry`] will be extracted.
|
|
|
|
/// (this type data is added automatically during registration if [`Reflect`] is derived with the `#[reflect(Resource)]` attribute).
|
|
|
|
/// This can be changed by [specifying a filter](DynamicSceneBuilder::with_resource_filter) or by explicitly
|
|
|
|
/// [allowing](DynamicSceneBuilder::allow_resource)/[denying](DynamicSceneBuilder::deny_resource) certain resources.
|
|
|
|
///
|
|
|
|
/// Extraction happens immediately and uses the filter as it exists during the time of extraction.
|
|
|
|
///
|
2022-10-27 23:38:03 +00:00
|
|
|
/// # Entity Order
|
|
|
|
///
|
bevy_scene: Add `SceneFilter` (#6793)
# Objective
Currently, `DynamicScene`s extract all components listed in the given
(or the world's) type registry. This acts as a quasi-filter of sorts.
However, it can be troublesome to use effectively and lacks decent
control.
For example, say you need to serialize only the following component over
the network:
```rust
#[derive(Reflect, Component, Default)]
#[reflect(Component)]
struct NPC {
name: Option<String>
}
```
To do this, you'd need to:
1. Create a new `AppTypeRegistry`
2. Register `NPC`
3. Register `Option<String>`
If we skip Step 3, then the entire scene might fail to serialize as
`Option<String>` requires registration.
Not only is this annoying and easy to forget, but it can leave users
with an impossible task: serializing a third-party type that contains
private types.
Generally, the third-party crate will register their private types
within a plugin so the user doesn't need to do it themselves. However,
this means we are now unable to serialize _just_ that type— we're forced
to allow everything!
## Solution
Add the `SceneFilter` enum for filtering components to extract.
This filter can be used to optionally allow or deny entire sets of
components/resources. With the `DynamicSceneBuilder`, users have more
control over how their `DynamicScene`s are built.
To only serialize a subset of components, use the `allow` method:
```rust
let scene = builder
.allow::<ComponentA>()
.allow::<ComponentB>()
.extract_entity(entity)
.build();
```
To serialize everything _but_ a subset of components, use the `deny`
method:
```rust
let scene = builder
.deny::<ComponentA>()
.deny::<ComponentB>()
.extract_entity(entity)
.build();
```
Or create a custom filter:
```rust
let components = HashSet::from([type_id]);
let filter = SceneFilter::Allowlist(components);
// let filter = SceneFilter::Denylist(components);
let scene = builder
.with_filter(Some(filter))
.extract_entity(entity)
.build();
```
Similar operations exist for resources:
<details>
<summary>View Resource Methods</summary>
To only serialize a subset of resources, use the `allow_resource`
method:
```rust
let scene = builder
.allow_resource::<ResourceA>()
.extract_resources()
.build();
```
To serialize everything _but_ a subset of resources, use the
`deny_resource` method:
```rust
let scene = builder
.deny_resource::<ResourceA>()
.extract_resources()
.build();
```
Or create a custom filter:
```rust
let resources = HashSet::from([type_id]);
let filter = SceneFilter::Allowlist(resources);
// let filter = SceneFilter::Denylist(resources);
let scene = builder
.with_resource_filter(Some(filter))
.extract_resources()
.build();
```
</details>
### Open Questions
- [x] ~~`allow` and `deny` are mutually exclusive. Currently, they
overwrite each other. Should this instead be a panic?~~ Took @soqb's
suggestion and made it so that the opposing method simply removes that
type from the list.
- [x] ~~`DynamicSceneBuilder` extracts entity data as soon as
`extract_entity`/`extract_entities` is called. Should this behavior
instead be moved to the `build` method to prevent ordering mixups (e.g.
`.allow::<Foo>().extract_entity(entity)` vs
`.extract_entity(entity).allow::<Foo>()`)? The tradeoff would be
iterating over the given entities twice: once at extraction and again at
build.~~ Based on the feedback from @Testare it sounds like it might be
better to just keep the current functionality (if anything we can open a
separate PR that adds deferred methods for extraction, so the
choice/performance hit is up to the user).
- [ ] An alternative might be to remove the filter from
`DynamicSceneBuilder` and have it as a separate parameter to the
extraction methods (either in the existing ones or as added
`extract_entity_with_filter`-type methods). Is this preferable?
- [x] ~~Should we include constructors that include common types to
allow/deny? For example, a `SceneFilter::standard_allowlist` that
includes things like `Parent` and `Children`?~~ Consensus suggests we
should. I may split this out into a followup PR, though.
- [x] ~~Should we add the ability to remove types from the filter
regardless of whether an allowlist or denylist (e.g.
`filter.remove::<Foo>()`)?~~ See the first list item
- [x] ~~Should `SceneFilter` be an enum? Would it make more sense as a
struct that contains an `is_denylist` boolean?~~ With the added
`SceneFilter::None` state (replacing the need to wrap in an `Option` or
rely on an empty `Denylist`), it seems an enum is better suited now
- [x] ~~Bikeshed: Do we like the naming convention? Should we instead
use `include`/`exclude` terminology?~~ Sounds like we're sticking with
`allow`/`deny`!
- [x] ~~Does this feature need a new example? Do we simply include it in
the existing one (maybe even as a comment?)? Should this be done in a
followup PR instead?~~ Example will be added in a followup PR
### Followup Tasks
- [ ] Add a dedicated `SceneFilter` example
- [ ] Possibly add default types to the filter (e.g. deny things like
`ComputedVisibility`, allow `Parent`, etc)
---
## Changelog
- Added the `SceneFilter` enum for filtering components and resources
when building a `DynamicScene`
- Added methods:
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::with_filter`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::allow`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::deny`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::allow_all`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::deny_all`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::with_resource_filter`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::allow_resource`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::deny_resource`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::allow_all_resources`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::deny_all_resources`
- Removed methods:
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::from_world_with_type_registry`
- `DynamicScene::from_scene` and `DynamicScene::from_world` no longer
require an `AppTypeRegistry` reference
## Migration Guide
- `DynamicScene::from_scene` and `DynamicScene::from_world` no longer
require an `AppTypeRegistry` reference:
```rust
// OLD
let registry = world.resource::<AppTypeRegistry>();
let dynamic_scene = DynamicScene::from_world(&world, registry);
// let dynamic_scene = DynamicScene::from_scene(&scene, registry);
// NEW
let dynamic_scene = DynamicScene::from_world(&world);
// let dynamic_scene = DynamicScene::from_scene(&scene);
```
- Removed `DynamicSceneBuilder::from_world_with_type_registry`. Now the
registry is automatically taken from the given world:
```rust
// OLD
let registry = world.resource::<AppTypeRegistry>();
let builder = DynamicSceneBuilder::from_world_with_type_registry(&world,
registry);
// NEW
let builder = DynamicSceneBuilder::from_world(&world);
```
2023-07-06 21:04:26 +00:00
|
|
|
/// Extracted entities will always be stored in ascending order based on their [index](Entity::index).
|
2022-10-27 23:38:03 +00:00
|
|
|
/// This means that inserting `Entity(1v0)` then `Entity(0v0)` will always result in the entities
|
|
|
|
/// being ordered as `[Entity(0v0), Entity(1v0)]`.
|
|
|
|
///
|
|
|
|
/// # Example
|
2022-10-12 01:48:16 +00:00
|
|
|
/// ```
|
|
|
|
/// # use bevy_scene::DynamicSceneBuilder;
|
2023-06-21 17:25:01 +00:00
|
|
|
/// # use bevy_ecs::reflect::AppTypeRegistry;
|
2022-10-12 01:48:16 +00:00
|
|
|
/// # use bevy_ecs::{
|
|
|
|
/// # component::Component, prelude::Entity, query::With, reflect::ReflectComponent, world::World,
|
|
|
|
/// # };
|
|
|
|
/// # use bevy_reflect::Reflect;
|
|
|
|
/// # #[derive(Component, Reflect, Default, Eq, PartialEq, Debug)]
|
|
|
|
/// # #[reflect(Component)]
|
|
|
|
/// # struct ComponentA;
|
|
|
|
/// # let mut world = World::default();
|
|
|
|
/// # world.init_resource::<AppTypeRegistry>();
|
|
|
|
/// # let entity = world.spawn(ComponentA).id();
|
2023-10-09 19:46:17 +00:00
|
|
|
/// let dynamic_scene = DynamicSceneBuilder::from_world(&world).extract_entity(entity).build();
|
2022-10-12 01:48:16 +00:00
|
|
|
/// ```
|
reflect: implement the unique reflect rfc (#7207)
# Objective
- Implements the [Unique Reflect
RFC](https://github.com/nicopap/rfcs/blob/bevy-reflect-api/rfcs/56-better-reflect.md).
## Solution
- Implements the RFC.
- This implementation differs in some ways from the RFC:
- In the RFC, it was suggested `Reflect: Any` but `PartialReflect:
?Any`. During initial implementation I tried this, but we assume the
`PartialReflect: 'static` in a lot of places and the changes required
crept out of the scope of this PR.
- `PartialReflect::try_into_reflect` originally returned `Option<Box<dyn
Reflect>>` but i changed this to `Result<Box<dyn Reflect>, Box<dyn
PartialReflect>>` since the method takes by value and otherwise there
would be no way to recover the type. `as_full` and `as_full_mut` both
still return `Option<&(mut) dyn Reflect>`.
---
## Changelog
- Added `PartialReflect`.
- `Reflect` is now a subtrait of `PartialReflect`.
- Moved most methods on `Reflect` to the new `PartialReflect`.
- Added `PartialReflect::{as_partial_reflect, as_partial_reflect_mut,
into_partial_reflect}`.
- Added `PartialReflect::{try_as_reflect, try_as_reflect_mut,
try_into_reflect}`.
- Added `<dyn PartialReflect>::{try_downcast_ref, try_downcast_mut,
try_downcast, try_take}` supplementing the methods on `dyn Reflect`.
## Migration Guide
- Most instances of `dyn Reflect` should be changed to `dyn
PartialReflect` which is less restrictive, however trait bounds should
generally stay as `T: Reflect`.
- The new `PartialReflect::{as_partial_reflect, as_partial_reflect_mut,
into_partial_reflect, try_as_reflect, try_as_reflect_mut,
try_into_reflect}` methods as well as `Reflect::{as_reflect,
as_reflect_mut, into_reflect}` will need to be implemented for manual
implementors of `Reflect`.
## Future Work
- This PR is designed to be followed up by another "Unique Reflect Phase
2" that addresses the following points:
- Investigate making serialization revolve around `Reflect` instead of
`PartialReflect`.
- [Remove the `try_*` methods on `dyn PartialReflect` since they are
stop
gaps](https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/pull/7207#discussion_r1083476050).
- Investigate usages like `ReflectComponent`. In the places they
currently use `PartialReflect`, should they be changed to use `Reflect`?
- Merging this opens the door to lots of reflection features we haven't
been able to implement.
- We could re-add [the `Reflectable`
trait](https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/blob/8e3488c88065a94a4f72199587e59341c9b6553d/crates/bevy_reflect/src/reflect.rs#L337-L342)
and make `FromReflect` a requirement to improve [`FromReflect`
ergonomics](https://github.com/bevyengine/rfcs/pull/59). This is
currently not possible because dynamic types cannot sensibly be
`FromReflect`.
- Since this is an alternative to #5772, #5781 would be made cleaner.
---------
Co-authored-by: Alice Cecile <alice.i.cecile@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Gino Valente <49806985+MrGVSV@users.noreply.github.com>
2024-08-12 17:01:41 +00:00
|
|
|
///
|
|
|
|
/// [`Reflect`]: bevy_reflect::Reflect
|
2022-10-12 01:48:16 +00:00
|
|
|
pub struct DynamicSceneBuilder<'w> {
|
reflect: implement the unique reflect rfc (#7207)
# Objective
- Implements the [Unique Reflect
RFC](https://github.com/nicopap/rfcs/blob/bevy-reflect-api/rfcs/56-better-reflect.md).
## Solution
- Implements the RFC.
- This implementation differs in some ways from the RFC:
- In the RFC, it was suggested `Reflect: Any` but `PartialReflect:
?Any`. During initial implementation I tried this, but we assume the
`PartialReflect: 'static` in a lot of places and the changes required
crept out of the scope of this PR.
- `PartialReflect::try_into_reflect` originally returned `Option<Box<dyn
Reflect>>` but i changed this to `Result<Box<dyn Reflect>, Box<dyn
PartialReflect>>` since the method takes by value and otherwise there
would be no way to recover the type. `as_full` and `as_full_mut` both
still return `Option<&(mut) dyn Reflect>`.
---
## Changelog
- Added `PartialReflect`.
- `Reflect` is now a subtrait of `PartialReflect`.
- Moved most methods on `Reflect` to the new `PartialReflect`.
- Added `PartialReflect::{as_partial_reflect, as_partial_reflect_mut,
into_partial_reflect}`.
- Added `PartialReflect::{try_as_reflect, try_as_reflect_mut,
try_into_reflect}`.
- Added `<dyn PartialReflect>::{try_downcast_ref, try_downcast_mut,
try_downcast, try_take}` supplementing the methods on `dyn Reflect`.
## Migration Guide
- Most instances of `dyn Reflect` should be changed to `dyn
PartialReflect` which is less restrictive, however trait bounds should
generally stay as `T: Reflect`.
- The new `PartialReflect::{as_partial_reflect, as_partial_reflect_mut,
into_partial_reflect, try_as_reflect, try_as_reflect_mut,
try_into_reflect}` methods as well as `Reflect::{as_reflect,
as_reflect_mut, into_reflect}` will need to be implemented for manual
implementors of `Reflect`.
## Future Work
- This PR is designed to be followed up by another "Unique Reflect Phase
2" that addresses the following points:
- Investigate making serialization revolve around `Reflect` instead of
`PartialReflect`.
- [Remove the `try_*` methods on `dyn PartialReflect` since they are
stop
gaps](https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/pull/7207#discussion_r1083476050).
- Investigate usages like `ReflectComponent`. In the places they
currently use `PartialReflect`, should they be changed to use `Reflect`?
- Merging this opens the door to lots of reflection features we haven't
been able to implement.
- We could re-add [the `Reflectable`
trait](https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/blob/8e3488c88065a94a4f72199587e59341c9b6553d/crates/bevy_reflect/src/reflect.rs#L337-L342)
and make `FromReflect` a requirement to improve [`FromReflect`
ergonomics](https://github.com/bevyengine/rfcs/pull/59). This is
currently not possible because dynamic types cannot sensibly be
`FromReflect`.
- Since this is an alternative to #5772, #5781 would be made cleaner.
---------
Co-authored-by: Alice Cecile <alice.i.cecile@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Gino Valente <49806985+MrGVSV@users.noreply.github.com>
2024-08-12 17:01:41 +00:00
|
|
|
extracted_resources: BTreeMap<ComponentId, Box<dyn PartialReflect>>,
|
Make scene handling of entity references robust (#7335)
# Objective
- Handle dangling entity references inside scenes
- Handle references to entities with generation > 0 inside scenes
- Fix a latent bug in `Parent`'s `MapEntities` implementation, which
would, if the parent was outside the scene, cause the scene to be loaded
into the new world with a parent reference potentially pointing to some
random entity in that new world.
- Fixes #4793 and addresses #7235
## Solution
- DynamicScenes now identify entities with a `Entity` instead of a u32,
therefore including generation
- `World` exposes a new `reserve_generations` function that despawns an
entity and advances its generation by some extra amount.
- `MapEntities` implementations have a new `get_or_reserve` function
available that will always return an `Entity`, establishing a new
mapping to a dead entity when the entity they are called with is not in
the `EntityMap`. Subsequent calls with that same `Entity` will return
the same newly created dead entity reference, preserving equality
semantics.
- As a result, after loading a scene containing references to dead
entities (or entities otherwise outside the scene), those references
will all point to different generations on a single entity id in the new
world.
---
## Changelog
### Changed
- In serialized scenes, entities are now identified by a u64 instead of
a u32.
- In serialized scenes, components with entity references now have those
references serialize as u64s instead of structs.
### Fixed
- Scenes containing components with entity references will now
deserialize and add to a world reliably.
## Migration Guide
- `MapEntities` implementations must change from a `&EntityMap`
parameter to a `&mut EntityMapper` parameter and can no longer return a
`Result`. Finally, they should switch from calling `EntityMap::get` to
calling `EntityMapper::get_or_reserve`.
---------
Co-authored-by: Nicola Papale <nicopap@users.noreply.github.com>
2023-05-01 15:49:27 +00:00
|
|
|
extracted_scene: BTreeMap<Entity, DynamicEntity>,
|
bevy_scene: Add `SceneFilter` (#6793)
# Objective
Currently, `DynamicScene`s extract all components listed in the given
(or the world's) type registry. This acts as a quasi-filter of sorts.
However, it can be troublesome to use effectively and lacks decent
control.
For example, say you need to serialize only the following component over
the network:
```rust
#[derive(Reflect, Component, Default)]
#[reflect(Component)]
struct NPC {
name: Option<String>
}
```
To do this, you'd need to:
1. Create a new `AppTypeRegistry`
2. Register `NPC`
3. Register `Option<String>`
If we skip Step 3, then the entire scene might fail to serialize as
`Option<String>` requires registration.
Not only is this annoying and easy to forget, but it can leave users
with an impossible task: serializing a third-party type that contains
private types.
Generally, the third-party crate will register their private types
within a plugin so the user doesn't need to do it themselves. However,
this means we are now unable to serialize _just_ that type— we're forced
to allow everything!
## Solution
Add the `SceneFilter` enum for filtering components to extract.
This filter can be used to optionally allow or deny entire sets of
components/resources. With the `DynamicSceneBuilder`, users have more
control over how their `DynamicScene`s are built.
To only serialize a subset of components, use the `allow` method:
```rust
let scene = builder
.allow::<ComponentA>()
.allow::<ComponentB>()
.extract_entity(entity)
.build();
```
To serialize everything _but_ a subset of components, use the `deny`
method:
```rust
let scene = builder
.deny::<ComponentA>()
.deny::<ComponentB>()
.extract_entity(entity)
.build();
```
Or create a custom filter:
```rust
let components = HashSet::from([type_id]);
let filter = SceneFilter::Allowlist(components);
// let filter = SceneFilter::Denylist(components);
let scene = builder
.with_filter(Some(filter))
.extract_entity(entity)
.build();
```
Similar operations exist for resources:
<details>
<summary>View Resource Methods</summary>
To only serialize a subset of resources, use the `allow_resource`
method:
```rust
let scene = builder
.allow_resource::<ResourceA>()
.extract_resources()
.build();
```
To serialize everything _but_ a subset of resources, use the
`deny_resource` method:
```rust
let scene = builder
.deny_resource::<ResourceA>()
.extract_resources()
.build();
```
Or create a custom filter:
```rust
let resources = HashSet::from([type_id]);
let filter = SceneFilter::Allowlist(resources);
// let filter = SceneFilter::Denylist(resources);
let scene = builder
.with_resource_filter(Some(filter))
.extract_resources()
.build();
```
</details>
### Open Questions
- [x] ~~`allow` and `deny` are mutually exclusive. Currently, they
overwrite each other. Should this instead be a panic?~~ Took @soqb's
suggestion and made it so that the opposing method simply removes that
type from the list.
- [x] ~~`DynamicSceneBuilder` extracts entity data as soon as
`extract_entity`/`extract_entities` is called. Should this behavior
instead be moved to the `build` method to prevent ordering mixups (e.g.
`.allow::<Foo>().extract_entity(entity)` vs
`.extract_entity(entity).allow::<Foo>()`)? The tradeoff would be
iterating over the given entities twice: once at extraction and again at
build.~~ Based on the feedback from @Testare it sounds like it might be
better to just keep the current functionality (if anything we can open a
separate PR that adds deferred methods for extraction, so the
choice/performance hit is up to the user).
- [ ] An alternative might be to remove the filter from
`DynamicSceneBuilder` and have it as a separate parameter to the
extraction methods (either in the existing ones or as added
`extract_entity_with_filter`-type methods). Is this preferable?
- [x] ~~Should we include constructors that include common types to
allow/deny? For example, a `SceneFilter::standard_allowlist` that
includes things like `Parent` and `Children`?~~ Consensus suggests we
should. I may split this out into a followup PR, though.
- [x] ~~Should we add the ability to remove types from the filter
regardless of whether an allowlist or denylist (e.g.
`filter.remove::<Foo>()`)?~~ See the first list item
- [x] ~~Should `SceneFilter` be an enum? Would it make more sense as a
struct that contains an `is_denylist` boolean?~~ With the added
`SceneFilter::None` state (replacing the need to wrap in an `Option` or
rely on an empty `Denylist`), it seems an enum is better suited now
- [x] ~~Bikeshed: Do we like the naming convention? Should we instead
use `include`/`exclude` terminology?~~ Sounds like we're sticking with
`allow`/`deny`!
- [x] ~~Does this feature need a new example? Do we simply include it in
the existing one (maybe even as a comment?)? Should this be done in a
followup PR instead?~~ Example will be added in a followup PR
### Followup Tasks
- [ ] Add a dedicated `SceneFilter` example
- [ ] Possibly add default types to the filter (e.g. deny things like
`ComputedVisibility`, allow `Parent`, etc)
---
## Changelog
- Added the `SceneFilter` enum for filtering components and resources
when building a `DynamicScene`
- Added methods:
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::with_filter`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::allow`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::deny`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::allow_all`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::deny_all`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::with_resource_filter`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::allow_resource`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::deny_resource`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::allow_all_resources`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::deny_all_resources`
- Removed methods:
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::from_world_with_type_registry`
- `DynamicScene::from_scene` and `DynamicScene::from_world` no longer
require an `AppTypeRegistry` reference
## Migration Guide
- `DynamicScene::from_scene` and `DynamicScene::from_world` no longer
require an `AppTypeRegistry` reference:
```rust
// OLD
let registry = world.resource::<AppTypeRegistry>();
let dynamic_scene = DynamicScene::from_world(&world, registry);
// let dynamic_scene = DynamicScene::from_scene(&scene, registry);
// NEW
let dynamic_scene = DynamicScene::from_world(&world);
// let dynamic_scene = DynamicScene::from_scene(&scene);
```
- Removed `DynamicSceneBuilder::from_world_with_type_registry`. Now the
registry is automatically taken from the given world:
```rust
// OLD
let registry = world.resource::<AppTypeRegistry>();
let builder = DynamicSceneBuilder::from_world_with_type_registry(&world,
registry);
// NEW
let builder = DynamicSceneBuilder::from_world(&world);
```
2023-07-06 21:04:26 +00:00
|
|
|
component_filter: SceneFilter,
|
|
|
|
resource_filter: SceneFilter,
|
2022-12-20 16:16:58 +00:00
|
|
|
original_world: &'w World,
|
2022-10-12 01:48:16 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
impl<'w> DynamicSceneBuilder<'w> {
|
|
|
|
/// Prepare a builder that will extract entities and their component from the given [`World`].
|
|
|
|
pub fn from_world(world: &'w World) -> Self {
|
|
|
|
Self {
|
(De) serialize resources in scenes (#6846)
# Objective
Co-Authored-By: davier
[bricedavier@gmail.com](mailto:bricedavier@gmail.com)
Fixes #3576.
Adds a `resources` field in scene serialization data to allow
de/serializing resources that have reflection enabled.
## Solution
Most of this code is taken from a previous closed PR:
https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/pull/3580. Most of the credit goes to
@Davier , what I did was mostly getting it to work on the latest main
branch of Bevy, along with adding a few asserts in the currently
existing tests to be sure everything is working properly.
This PR changes the scene format to include resources in this way:
```
(
resources: {
// List of resources here, keyed by resource type name.
},
entities: [
// Previous scene format here
],
)
```
An example taken from the tests:
```
(
resources: {
"bevy_scene::serde::tests::MyResource": (
foo: 123,
),
},
entities: {
// Previous scene format here
},
)
```
For this, a `resources` fields has been added on the `DynamicScene` and
the `DynamicSceneBuilder` structs. The latter now also has a method
named `extract_resources` to properly extract the existing resources
registered in the local type registry, in a similar way to
`extract_entities`.
---
## Changelog
Added: Reflect resources registered in the type registry used by dynamic
scenes will now be properly de/serialized in scene data.
## Migration Guide
Since the scene format has been changed, the user may not be able to use
scenes saved prior to this PR due to the `resources` scene field being
missing. ~~To preserve backwards compatibility, I will try to make the
`resources` fully optional so that old scenes can be loaded without
issue.~~
## TODOs
- [x] I may have to update a few doc blocks still referring to dynamic
scenes as mere container of entities, since they now include resources
as well.
- [x] ~~I want to make the `resources` key optional, as specified in the
Migration Guide, so that old scenes will be compatible with this
change.~~ Since this would only be trivial for ron format, I think it
might be better to consider it in a separate PR/discussion to figure out
if it could be done for binary serialization too.
- [x] I suppose it might be a good idea to add a resources in the scene
example so that users will quickly notice they can serialize resources
just like entities.
---------
Co-authored-by: Carter Anderson <mcanders1@gmail.com>
2023-03-20 21:17:02 +00:00
|
|
|
extracted_resources: default(),
|
2022-12-20 16:16:58 +00:00
|
|
|
extracted_scene: default(),
|
bevy_scene: Add `SceneFilter` (#6793)
# Objective
Currently, `DynamicScene`s extract all components listed in the given
(or the world's) type registry. This acts as a quasi-filter of sorts.
However, it can be troublesome to use effectively and lacks decent
control.
For example, say you need to serialize only the following component over
the network:
```rust
#[derive(Reflect, Component, Default)]
#[reflect(Component)]
struct NPC {
name: Option<String>
}
```
To do this, you'd need to:
1. Create a new `AppTypeRegistry`
2. Register `NPC`
3. Register `Option<String>`
If we skip Step 3, then the entire scene might fail to serialize as
`Option<String>` requires registration.
Not only is this annoying and easy to forget, but it can leave users
with an impossible task: serializing a third-party type that contains
private types.
Generally, the third-party crate will register their private types
within a plugin so the user doesn't need to do it themselves. However,
this means we are now unable to serialize _just_ that type— we're forced
to allow everything!
## Solution
Add the `SceneFilter` enum for filtering components to extract.
This filter can be used to optionally allow or deny entire sets of
components/resources. With the `DynamicSceneBuilder`, users have more
control over how their `DynamicScene`s are built.
To only serialize a subset of components, use the `allow` method:
```rust
let scene = builder
.allow::<ComponentA>()
.allow::<ComponentB>()
.extract_entity(entity)
.build();
```
To serialize everything _but_ a subset of components, use the `deny`
method:
```rust
let scene = builder
.deny::<ComponentA>()
.deny::<ComponentB>()
.extract_entity(entity)
.build();
```
Or create a custom filter:
```rust
let components = HashSet::from([type_id]);
let filter = SceneFilter::Allowlist(components);
// let filter = SceneFilter::Denylist(components);
let scene = builder
.with_filter(Some(filter))
.extract_entity(entity)
.build();
```
Similar operations exist for resources:
<details>
<summary>View Resource Methods</summary>
To only serialize a subset of resources, use the `allow_resource`
method:
```rust
let scene = builder
.allow_resource::<ResourceA>()
.extract_resources()
.build();
```
To serialize everything _but_ a subset of resources, use the
`deny_resource` method:
```rust
let scene = builder
.deny_resource::<ResourceA>()
.extract_resources()
.build();
```
Or create a custom filter:
```rust
let resources = HashSet::from([type_id]);
let filter = SceneFilter::Allowlist(resources);
// let filter = SceneFilter::Denylist(resources);
let scene = builder
.with_resource_filter(Some(filter))
.extract_resources()
.build();
```
</details>
### Open Questions
- [x] ~~`allow` and `deny` are mutually exclusive. Currently, they
overwrite each other. Should this instead be a panic?~~ Took @soqb's
suggestion and made it so that the opposing method simply removes that
type from the list.
- [x] ~~`DynamicSceneBuilder` extracts entity data as soon as
`extract_entity`/`extract_entities` is called. Should this behavior
instead be moved to the `build` method to prevent ordering mixups (e.g.
`.allow::<Foo>().extract_entity(entity)` vs
`.extract_entity(entity).allow::<Foo>()`)? The tradeoff would be
iterating over the given entities twice: once at extraction and again at
build.~~ Based on the feedback from @Testare it sounds like it might be
better to just keep the current functionality (if anything we can open a
separate PR that adds deferred methods for extraction, so the
choice/performance hit is up to the user).
- [ ] An alternative might be to remove the filter from
`DynamicSceneBuilder` and have it as a separate parameter to the
extraction methods (either in the existing ones or as added
`extract_entity_with_filter`-type methods). Is this preferable?
- [x] ~~Should we include constructors that include common types to
allow/deny? For example, a `SceneFilter::standard_allowlist` that
includes things like `Parent` and `Children`?~~ Consensus suggests we
should. I may split this out into a followup PR, though.
- [x] ~~Should we add the ability to remove types from the filter
regardless of whether an allowlist or denylist (e.g.
`filter.remove::<Foo>()`)?~~ See the first list item
- [x] ~~Should `SceneFilter` be an enum? Would it make more sense as a
struct that contains an `is_denylist` boolean?~~ With the added
`SceneFilter::None` state (replacing the need to wrap in an `Option` or
rely on an empty `Denylist`), it seems an enum is better suited now
- [x] ~~Bikeshed: Do we like the naming convention? Should we instead
use `include`/`exclude` terminology?~~ Sounds like we're sticking with
`allow`/`deny`!
- [x] ~~Does this feature need a new example? Do we simply include it in
the existing one (maybe even as a comment?)? Should this be done in a
followup PR instead?~~ Example will be added in a followup PR
### Followup Tasks
- [ ] Add a dedicated `SceneFilter` example
- [ ] Possibly add default types to the filter (e.g. deny things like
`ComputedVisibility`, allow `Parent`, etc)
---
## Changelog
- Added the `SceneFilter` enum for filtering components and resources
when building a `DynamicScene`
- Added methods:
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::with_filter`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::allow`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::deny`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::allow_all`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::deny_all`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::with_resource_filter`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::allow_resource`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::deny_resource`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::allow_all_resources`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::deny_all_resources`
- Removed methods:
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::from_world_with_type_registry`
- `DynamicScene::from_scene` and `DynamicScene::from_world` no longer
require an `AppTypeRegistry` reference
## Migration Guide
- `DynamicScene::from_scene` and `DynamicScene::from_world` no longer
require an `AppTypeRegistry` reference:
```rust
// OLD
let registry = world.resource::<AppTypeRegistry>();
let dynamic_scene = DynamicScene::from_world(&world, registry);
// let dynamic_scene = DynamicScene::from_scene(&scene, registry);
// NEW
let dynamic_scene = DynamicScene::from_world(&world);
// let dynamic_scene = DynamicScene::from_scene(&scene);
```
- Removed `DynamicSceneBuilder::from_world_with_type_registry`. Now the
registry is automatically taken from the given world:
```rust
// OLD
let registry = world.resource::<AppTypeRegistry>();
let builder = DynamicSceneBuilder::from_world_with_type_registry(&world,
registry);
// NEW
let builder = DynamicSceneBuilder::from_world(&world);
```
2023-07-06 21:04:26 +00:00
|
|
|
component_filter: SceneFilter::default(),
|
|
|
|
resource_filter: SceneFilter::default(),
|
2022-12-20 16:16:58 +00:00
|
|
|
original_world: world,
|
2022-10-12 01:48:16 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
bevy_scene: Add `SceneFilter` (#6793)
# Objective
Currently, `DynamicScene`s extract all components listed in the given
(or the world's) type registry. This acts as a quasi-filter of sorts.
However, it can be troublesome to use effectively and lacks decent
control.
For example, say you need to serialize only the following component over
the network:
```rust
#[derive(Reflect, Component, Default)]
#[reflect(Component)]
struct NPC {
name: Option<String>
}
```
To do this, you'd need to:
1. Create a new `AppTypeRegistry`
2. Register `NPC`
3. Register `Option<String>`
If we skip Step 3, then the entire scene might fail to serialize as
`Option<String>` requires registration.
Not only is this annoying and easy to forget, but it can leave users
with an impossible task: serializing a third-party type that contains
private types.
Generally, the third-party crate will register their private types
within a plugin so the user doesn't need to do it themselves. However,
this means we are now unable to serialize _just_ that type— we're forced
to allow everything!
## Solution
Add the `SceneFilter` enum for filtering components to extract.
This filter can be used to optionally allow or deny entire sets of
components/resources. With the `DynamicSceneBuilder`, users have more
control over how their `DynamicScene`s are built.
To only serialize a subset of components, use the `allow` method:
```rust
let scene = builder
.allow::<ComponentA>()
.allow::<ComponentB>()
.extract_entity(entity)
.build();
```
To serialize everything _but_ a subset of components, use the `deny`
method:
```rust
let scene = builder
.deny::<ComponentA>()
.deny::<ComponentB>()
.extract_entity(entity)
.build();
```
Or create a custom filter:
```rust
let components = HashSet::from([type_id]);
let filter = SceneFilter::Allowlist(components);
// let filter = SceneFilter::Denylist(components);
let scene = builder
.with_filter(Some(filter))
.extract_entity(entity)
.build();
```
Similar operations exist for resources:
<details>
<summary>View Resource Methods</summary>
To only serialize a subset of resources, use the `allow_resource`
method:
```rust
let scene = builder
.allow_resource::<ResourceA>()
.extract_resources()
.build();
```
To serialize everything _but_ a subset of resources, use the
`deny_resource` method:
```rust
let scene = builder
.deny_resource::<ResourceA>()
.extract_resources()
.build();
```
Or create a custom filter:
```rust
let resources = HashSet::from([type_id]);
let filter = SceneFilter::Allowlist(resources);
// let filter = SceneFilter::Denylist(resources);
let scene = builder
.with_resource_filter(Some(filter))
.extract_resources()
.build();
```
</details>
### Open Questions
- [x] ~~`allow` and `deny` are mutually exclusive. Currently, they
overwrite each other. Should this instead be a panic?~~ Took @soqb's
suggestion and made it so that the opposing method simply removes that
type from the list.
- [x] ~~`DynamicSceneBuilder` extracts entity data as soon as
`extract_entity`/`extract_entities` is called. Should this behavior
instead be moved to the `build` method to prevent ordering mixups (e.g.
`.allow::<Foo>().extract_entity(entity)` vs
`.extract_entity(entity).allow::<Foo>()`)? The tradeoff would be
iterating over the given entities twice: once at extraction and again at
build.~~ Based on the feedback from @Testare it sounds like it might be
better to just keep the current functionality (if anything we can open a
separate PR that adds deferred methods for extraction, so the
choice/performance hit is up to the user).
- [ ] An alternative might be to remove the filter from
`DynamicSceneBuilder` and have it as a separate parameter to the
extraction methods (either in the existing ones or as added
`extract_entity_with_filter`-type methods). Is this preferable?
- [x] ~~Should we include constructors that include common types to
allow/deny? For example, a `SceneFilter::standard_allowlist` that
includes things like `Parent` and `Children`?~~ Consensus suggests we
should. I may split this out into a followup PR, though.
- [x] ~~Should we add the ability to remove types from the filter
regardless of whether an allowlist or denylist (e.g.
`filter.remove::<Foo>()`)?~~ See the first list item
- [x] ~~Should `SceneFilter` be an enum? Would it make more sense as a
struct that contains an `is_denylist` boolean?~~ With the added
`SceneFilter::None` state (replacing the need to wrap in an `Option` or
rely on an empty `Denylist`), it seems an enum is better suited now
- [x] ~~Bikeshed: Do we like the naming convention? Should we instead
use `include`/`exclude` terminology?~~ Sounds like we're sticking with
`allow`/`deny`!
- [x] ~~Does this feature need a new example? Do we simply include it in
the existing one (maybe even as a comment?)? Should this be done in a
followup PR instead?~~ Example will be added in a followup PR
### Followup Tasks
- [ ] Add a dedicated `SceneFilter` example
- [ ] Possibly add default types to the filter (e.g. deny things like
`ComputedVisibility`, allow `Parent`, etc)
---
## Changelog
- Added the `SceneFilter` enum for filtering components and resources
when building a `DynamicScene`
- Added methods:
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::with_filter`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::allow`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::deny`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::allow_all`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::deny_all`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::with_resource_filter`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::allow_resource`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::deny_resource`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::allow_all_resources`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::deny_all_resources`
- Removed methods:
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::from_world_with_type_registry`
- `DynamicScene::from_scene` and `DynamicScene::from_world` no longer
require an `AppTypeRegistry` reference
## Migration Guide
- `DynamicScene::from_scene` and `DynamicScene::from_world` no longer
require an `AppTypeRegistry` reference:
```rust
// OLD
let registry = world.resource::<AppTypeRegistry>();
let dynamic_scene = DynamicScene::from_world(&world, registry);
// let dynamic_scene = DynamicScene::from_scene(&scene, registry);
// NEW
let dynamic_scene = DynamicScene::from_world(&world);
// let dynamic_scene = DynamicScene::from_scene(&scene);
```
- Removed `DynamicSceneBuilder::from_world_with_type_registry`. Now the
registry is automatically taken from the given world:
```rust
// OLD
let registry = world.resource::<AppTypeRegistry>();
let builder = DynamicSceneBuilder::from_world_with_type_registry(&world,
registry);
// NEW
let builder = DynamicSceneBuilder::from_world(&world);
```
2023-07-06 21:04:26 +00:00
|
|
|
/// Specify a custom component [`SceneFilter`] to be used with this builder.
|
2023-10-09 19:46:17 +00:00
|
|
|
#[must_use]
|
2024-09-15 14:37:32 +00:00
|
|
|
pub fn with_component_filter(mut self, filter: SceneFilter) -> Self {
|
bevy_scene: Add `SceneFilter` (#6793)
# Objective
Currently, `DynamicScene`s extract all components listed in the given
(or the world's) type registry. This acts as a quasi-filter of sorts.
However, it can be troublesome to use effectively and lacks decent
control.
For example, say you need to serialize only the following component over
the network:
```rust
#[derive(Reflect, Component, Default)]
#[reflect(Component)]
struct NPC {
name: Option<String>
}
```
To do this, you'd need to:
1. Create a new `AppTypeRegistry`
2. Register `NPC`
3. Register `Option<String>`
If we skip Step 3, then the entire scene might fail to serialize as
`Option<String>` requires registration.
Not only is this annoying and easy to forget, but it can leave users
with an impossible task: serializing a third-party type that contains
private types.
Generally, the third-party crate will register their private types
within a plugin so the user doesn't need to do it themselves. However,
this means we are now unable to serialize _just_ that type— we're forced
to allow everything!
## Solution
Add the `SceneFilter` enum for filtering components to extract.
This filter can be used to optionally allow or deny entire sets of
components/resources. With the `DynamicSceneBuilder`, users have more
control over how their `DynamicScene`s are built.
To only serialize a subset of components, use the `allow` method:
```rust
let scene = builder
.allow::<ComponentA>()
.allow::<ComponentB>()
.extract_entity(entity)
.build();
```
To serialize everything _but_ a subset of components, use the `deny`
method:
```rust
let scene = builder
.deny::<ComponentA>()
.deny::<ComponentB>()
.extract_entity(entity)
.build();
```
Or create a custom filter:
```rust
let components = HashSet::from([type_id]);
let filter = SceneFilter::Allowlist(components);
// let filter = SceneFilter::Denylist(components);
let scene = builder
.with_filter(Some(filter))
.extract_entity(entity)
.build();
```
Similar operations exist for resources:
<details>
<summary>View Resource Methods</summary>
To only serialize a subset of resources, use the `allow_resource`
method:
```rust
let scene = builder
.allow_resource::<ResourceA>()
.extract_resources()
.build();
```
To serialize everything _but_ a subset of resources, use the
`deny_resource` method:
```rust
let scene = builder
.deny_resource::<ResourceA>()
.extract_resources()
.build();
```
Or create a custom filter:
```rust
let resources = HashSet::from([type_id]);
let filter = SceneFilter::Allowlist(resources);
// let filter = SceneFilter::Denylist(resources);
let scene = builder
.with_resource_filter(Some(filter))
.extract_resources()
.build();
```
</details>
### Open Questions
- [x] ~~`allow` and `deny` are mutually exclusive. Currently, they
overwrite each other. Should this instead be a panic?~~ Took @soqb's
suggestion and made it so that the opposing method simply removes that
type from the list.
- [x] ~~`DynamicSceneBuilder` extracts entity data as soon as
`extract_entity`/`extract_entities` is called. Should this behavior
instead be moved to the `build` method to prevent ordering mixups (e.g.
`.allow::<Foo>().extract_entity(entity)` vs
`.extract_entity(entity).allow::<Foo>()`)? The tradeoff would be
iterating over the given entities twice: once at extraction and again at
build.~~ Based on the feedback from @Testare it sounds like it might be
better to just keep the current functionality (if anything we can open a
separate PR that adds deferred methods for extraction, so the
choice/performance hit is up to the user).
- [ ] An alternative might be to remove the filter from
`DynamicSceneBuilder` and have it as a separate parameter to the
extraction methods (either in the existing ones or as added
`extract_entity_with_filter`-type methods). Is this preferable?
- [x] ~~Should we include constructors that include common types to
allow/deny? For example, a `SceneFilter::standard_allowlist` that
includes things like `Parent` and `Children`?~~ Consensus suggests we
should. I may split this out into a followup PR, though.
- [x] ~~Should we add the ability to remove types from the filter
regardless of whether an allowlist or denylist (e.g.
`filter.remove::<Foo>()`)?~~ See the first list item
- [x] ~~Should `SceneFilter` be an enum? Would it make more sense as a
struct that contains an `is_denylist` boolean?~~ With the added
`SceneFilter::None` state (replacing the need to wrap in an `Option` or
rely on an empty `Denylist`), it seems an enum is better suited now
- [x] ~~Bikeshed: Do we like the naming convention? Should we instead
use `include`/`exclude` terminology?~~ Sounds like we're sticking with
`allow`/`deny`!
- [x] ~~Does this feature need a new example? Do we simply include it in
the existing one (maybe even as a comment?)? Should this be done in a
followup PR instead?~~ Example will be added in a followup PR
### Followup Tasks
- [ ] Add a dedicated `SceneFilter` example
- [ ] Possibly add default types to the filter (e.g. deny things like
`ComputedVisibility`, allow `Parent`, etc)
---
## Changelog
- Added the `SceneFilter` enum for filtering components and resources
when building a `DynamicScene`
- Added methods:
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::with_filter`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::allow`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::deny`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::allow_all`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::deny_all`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::with_resource_filter`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::allow_resource`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::deny_resource`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::allow_all_resources`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::deny_all_resources`
- Removed methods:
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::from_world_with_type_registry`
- `DynamicScene::from_scene` and `DynamicScene::from_world` no longer
require an `AppTypeRegistry` reference
## Migration Guide
- `DynamicScene::from_scene` and `DynamicScene::from_world` no longer
require an `AppTypeRegistry` reference:
```rust
// OLD
let registry = world.resource::<AppTypeRegistry>();
let dynamic_scene = DynamicScene::from_world(&world, registry);
// let dynamic_scene = DynamicScene::from_scene(&scene, registry);
// NEW
let dynamic_scene = DynamicScene::from_world(&world);
// let dynamic_scene = DynamicScene::from_scene(&scene);
```
- Removed `DynamicSceneBuilder::from_world_with_type_registry`. Now the
registry is automatically taken from the given world:
```rust
// OLD
let registry = world.resource::<AppTypeRegistry>();
let builder = DynamicSceneBuilder::from_world_with_type_registry(&world,
registry);
// NEW
let builder = DynamicSceneBuilder::from_world(&world);
```
2023-07-06 21:04:26 +00:00
|
|
|
self.component_filter = filter;
|
|
|
|
self
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/// Specify a custom resource [`SceneFilter`] to be used with this builder.
|
2023-10-09 19:46:17 +00:00
|
|
|
#[must_use]
|
|
|
|
pub fn with_resource_filter(mut self, filter: SceneFilter) -> Self {
|
bevy_scene: Add `SceneFilter` (#6793)
# Objective
Currently, `DynamicScene`s extract all components listed in the given
(or the world's) type registry. This acts as a quasi-filter of sorts.
However, it can be troublesome to use effectively and lacks decent
control.
For example, say you need to serialize only the following component over
the network:
```rust
#[derive(Reflect, Component, Default)]
#[reflect(Component)]
struct NPC {
name: Option<String>
}
```
To do this, you'd need to:
1. Create a new `AppTypeRegistry`
2. Register `NPC`
3. Register `Option<String>`
If we skip Step 3, then the entire scene might fail to serialize as
`Option<String>` requires registration.
Not only is this annoying and easy to forget, but it can leave users
with an impossible task: serializing a third-party type that contains
private types.
Generally, the third-party crate will register their private types
within a plugin so the user doesn't need to do it themselves. However,
this means we are now unable to serialize _just_ that type— we're forced
to allow everything!
## Solution
Add the `SceneFilter` enum for filtering components to extract.
This filter can be used to optionally allow or deny entire sets of
components/resources. With the `DynamicSceneBuilder`, users have more
control over how their `DynamicScene`s are built.
To only serialize a subset of components, use the `allow` method:
```rust
let scene = builder
.allow::<ComponentA>()
.allow::<ComponentB>()
.extract_entity(entity)
.build();
```
To serialize everything _but_ a subset of components, use the `deny`
method:
```rust
let scene = builder
.deny::<ComponentA>()
.deny::<ComponentB>()
.extract_entity(entity)
.build();
```
Or create a custom filter:
```rust
let components = HashSet::from([type_id]);
let filter = SceneFilter::Allowlist(components);
// let filter = SceneFilter::Denylist(components);
let scene = builder
.with_filter(Some(filter))
.extract_entity(entity)
.build();
```
Similar operations exist for resources:
<details>
<summary>View Resource Methods</summary>
To only serialize a subset of resources, use the `allow_resource`
method:
```rust
let scene = builder
.allow_resource::<ResourceA>()
.extract_resources()
.build();
```
To serialize everything _but_ a subset of resources, use the
`deny_resource` method:
```rust
let scene = builder
.deny_resource::<ResourceA>()
.extract_resources()
.build();
```
Or create a custom filter:
```rust
let resources = HashSet::from([type_id]);
let filter = SceneFilter::Allowlist(resources);
// let filter = SceneFilter::Denylist(resources);
let scene = builder
.with_resource_filter(Some(filter))
.extract_resources()
.build();
```
</details>
### Open Questions
- [x] ~~`allow` and `deny` are mutually exclusive. Currently, they
overwrite each other. Should this instead be a panic?~~ Took @soqb's
suggestion and made it so that the opposing method simply removes that
type from the list.
- [x] ~~`DynamicSceneBuilder` extracts entity data as soon as
`extract_entity`/`extract_entities` is called. Should this behavior
instead be moved to the `build` method to prevent ordering mixups (e.g.
`.allow::<Foo>().extract_entity(entity)` vs
`.extract_entity(entity).allow::<Foo>()`)? The tradeoff would be
iterating over the given entities twice: once at extraction and again at
build.~~ Based on the feedback from @Testare it sounds like it might be
better to just keep the current functionality (if anything we can open a
separate PR that adds deferred methods for extraction, so the
choice/performance hit is up to the user).
- [ ] An alternative might be to remove the filter from
`DynamicSceneBuilder` and have it as a separate parameter to the
extraction methods (either in the existing ones or as added
`extract_entity_with_filter`-type methods). Is this preferable?
- [x] ~~Should we include constructors that include common types to
allow/deny? For example, a `SceneFilter::standard_allowlist` that
includes things like `Parent` and `Children`?~~ Consensus suggests we
should. I may split this out into a followup PR, though.
- [x] ~~Should we add the ability to remove types from the filter
regardless of whether an allowlist or denylist (e.g.
`filter.remove::<Foo>()`)?~~ See the first list item
- [x] ~~Should `SceneFilter` be an enum? Would it make more sense as a
struct that contains an `is_denylist` boolean?~~ With the added
`SceneFilter::None` state (replacing the need to wrap in an `Option` or
rely on an empty `Denylist`), it seems an enum is better suited now
- [x] ~~Bikeshed: Do we like the naming convention? Should we instead
use `include`/`exclude` terminology?~~ Sounds like we're sticking with
`allow`/`deny`!
- [x] ~~Does this feature need a new example? Do we simply include it in
the existing one (maybe even as a comment?)? Should this be done in a
followup PR instead?~~ Example will be added in a followup PR
### Followup Tasks
- [ ] Add a dedicated `SceneFilter` example
- [ ] Possibly add default types to the filter (e.g. deny things like
`ComputedVisibility`, allow `Parent`, etc)
---
## Changelog
- Added the `SceneFilter` enum for filtering components and resources
when building a `DynamicScene`
- Added methods:
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::with_filter`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::allow`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::deny`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::allow_all`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::deny_all`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::with_resource_filter`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::allow_resource`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::deny_resource`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::allow_all_resources`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::deny_all_resources`
- Removed methods:
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::from_world_with_type_registry`
- `DynamicScene::from_scene` and `DynamicScene::from_world` no longer
require an `AppTypeRegistry` reference
## Migration Guide
- `DynamicScene::from_scene` and `DynamicScene::from_world` no longer
require an `AppTypeRegistry` reference:
```rust
// OLD
let registry = world.resource::<AppTypeRegistry>();
let dynamic_scene = DynamicScene::from_world(&world, registry);
// let dynamic_scene = DynamicScene::from_scene(&scene, registry);
// NEW
let dynamic_scene = DynamicScene::from_world(&world);
// let dynamic_scene = DynamicScene::from_scene(&scene);
```
- Removed `DynamicSceneBuilder::from_world_with_type_registry`. Now the
registry is automatically taken from the given world:
```rust
// OLD
let registry = world.resource::<AppTypeRegistry>();
let builder = DynamicSceneBuilder::from_world_with_type_registry(&world,
registry);
// NEW
let builder = DynamicSceneBuilder::from_world(&world);
```
2023-07-06 21:04:26 +00:00
|
|
|
self.resource_filter = filter;
|
|
|
|
self
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2024-09-15 15:30:53 +00:00
|
|
|
/// Updates the filter to allow all component and resource types.
|
|
|
|
///
|
|
|
|
/// This is useful for resetting the filter so that types may be selectively denied
|
|
|
|
/// with [`deny_component`](`Self::deny_component`) and [`deny_resource`](`Self::deny_resource`).
|
|
|
|
pub fn allow_all(mut self) -> Self {
|
|
|
|
self.component_filter = SceneFilter::allow_all();
|
|
|
|
self.resource_filter = SceneFilter::allow_all();
|
|
|
|
self
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/// Updates the filter to deny all component and resource types.
|
|
|
|
///
|
|
|
|
/// This is useful for resetting the filter so that types may be selectively allowed
|
|
|
|
/// with [`allow_component`](`Self::allow_component`) and [`allow_resource`](`Self::allow_resource`).
|
|
|
|
pub fn deny_all(mut self) -> Self {
|
|
|
|
self.component_filter = SceneFilter::deny_all();
|
|
|
|
self.resource_filter = SceneFilter::deny_all();
|
|
|
|
self
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
bevy_scene: Add `SceneFilter` (#6793)
# Objective
Currently, `DynamicScene`s extract all components listed in the given
(or the world's) type registry. This acts as a quasi-filter of sorts.
However, it can be troublesome to use effectively and lacks decent
control.
For example, say you need to serialize only the following component over
the network:
```rust
#[derive(Reflect, Component, Default)]
#[reflect(Component)]
struct NPC {
name: Option<String>
}
```
To do this, you'd need to:
1. Create a new `AppTypeRegistry`
2. Register `NPC`
3. Register `Option<String>`
If we skip Step 3, then the entire scene might fail to serialize as
`Option<String>` requires registration.
Not only is this annoying and easy to forget, but it can leave users
with an impossible task: serializing a third-party type that contains
private types.
Generally, the third-party crate will register their private types
within a plugin so the user doesn't need to do it themselves. However,
this means we are now unable to serialize _just_ that type— we're forced
to allow everything!
## Solution
Add the `SceneFilter` enum for filtering components to extract.
This filter can be used to optionally allow or deny entire sets of
components/resources. With the `DynamicSceneBuilder`, users have more
control over how their `DynamicScene`s are built.
To only serialize a subset of components, use the `allow` method:
```rust
let scene = builder
.allow::<ComponentA>()
.allow::<ComponentB>()
.extract_entity(entity)
.build();
```
To serialize everything _but_ a subset of components, use the `deny`
method:
```rust
let scene = builder
.deny::<ComponentA>()
.deny::<ComponentB>()
.extract_entity(entity)
.build();
```
Or create a custom filter:
```rust
let components = HashSet::from([type_id]);
let filter = SceneFilter::Allowlist(components);
// let filter = SceneFilter::Denylist(components);
let scene = builder
.with_filter(Some(filter))
.extract_entity(entity)
.build();
```
Similar operations exist for resources:
<details>
<summary>View Resource Methods</summary>
To only serialize a subset of resources, use the `allow_resource`
method:
```rust
let scene = builder
.allow_resource::<ResourceA>()
.extract_resources()
.build();
```
To serialize everything _but_ a subset of resources, use the
`deny_resource` method:
```rust
let scene = builder
.deny_resource::<ResourceA>()
.extract_resources()
.build();
```
Or create a custom filter:
```rust
let resources = HashSet::from([type_id]);
let filter = SceneFilter::Allowlist(resources);
// let filter = SceneFilter::Denylist(resources);
let scene = builder
.with_resource_filter(Some(filter))
.extract_resources()
.build();
```
</details>
### Open Questions
- [x] ~~`allow` and `deny` are mutually exclusive. Currently, they
overwrite each other. Should this instead be a panic?~~ Took @soqb's
suggestion and made it so that the opposing method simply removes that
type from the list.
- [x] ~~`DynamicSceneBuilder` extracts entity data as soon as
`extract_entity`/`extract_entities` is called. Should this behavior
instead be moved to the `build` method to prevent ordering mixups (e.g.
`.allow::<Foo>().extract_entity(entity)` vs
`.extract_entity(entity).allow::<Foo>()`)? The tradeoff would be
iterating over the given entities twice: once at extraction and again at
build.~~ Based on the feedback from @Testare it sounds like it might be
better to just keep the current functionality (if anything we can open a
separate PR that adds deferred methods for extraction, so the
choice/performance hit is up to the user).
- [ ] An alternative might be to remove the filter from
`DynamicSceneBuilder` and have it as a separate parameter to the
extraction methods (either in the existing ones or as added
`extract_entity_with_filter`-type methods). Is this preferable?
- [x] ~~Should we include constructors that include common types to
allow/deny? For example, a `SceneFilter::standard_allowlist` that
includes things like `Parent` and `Children`?~~ Consensus suggests we
should. I may split this out into a followup PR, though.
- [x] ~~Should we add the ability to remove types from the filter
regardless of whether an allowlist or denylist (e.g.
`filter.remove::<Foo>()`)?~~ See the first list item
- [x] ~~Should `SceneFilter` be an enum? Would it make more sense as a
struct that contains an `is_denylist` boolean?~~ With the added
`SceneFilter::None` state (replacing the need to wrap in an `Option` or
rely on an empty `Denylist`), it seems an enum is better suited now
- [x] ~~Bikeshed: Do we like the naming convention? Should we instead
use `include`/`exclude` terminology?~~ Sounds like we're sticking with
`allow`/`deny`!
- [x] ~~Does this feature need a new example? Do we simply include it in
the existing one (maybe even as a comment?)? Should this be done in a
followup PR instead?~~ Example will be added in a followup PR
### Followup Tasks
- [ ] Add a dedicated `SceneFilter` example
- [ ] Possibly add default types to the filter (e.g. deny things like
`ComputedVisibility`, allow `Parent`, etc)
---
## Changelog
- Added the `SceneFilter` enum for filtering components and resources
when building a `DynamicScene`
- Added methods:
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::with_filter`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::allow`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::deny`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::allow_all`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::deny_all`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::with_resource_filter`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::allow_resource`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::deny_resource`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::allow_all_resources`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::deny_all_resources`
- Removed methods:
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::from_world_with_type_registry`
- `DynamicScene::from_scene` and `DynamicScene::from_world` no longer
require an `AppTypeRegistry` reference
## Migration Guide
- `DynamicScene::from_scene` and `DynamicScene::from_world` no longer
require an `AppTypeRegistry` reference:
```rust
// OLD
let registry = world.resource::<AppTypeRegistry>();
let dynamic_scene = DynamicScene::from_world(&world, registry);
// let dynamic_scene = DynamicScene::from_scene(&scene, registry);
// NEW
let dynamic_scene = DynamicScene::from_world(&world);
// let dynamic_scene = DynamicScene::from_scene(&scene);
```
- Removed `DynamicSceneBuilder::from_world_with_type_registry`. Now the
registry is automatically taken from the given world:
```rust
// OLD
let registry = world.resource::<AppTypeRegistry>();
let builder = DynamicSceneBuilder::from_world_with_type_registry(&world,
registry);
// NEW
let builder = DynamicSceneBuilder::from_world(&world);
```
2023-07-06 21:04:26 +00:00
|
|
|
/// Allows the given component type, `T`, to be included in the generated scene.
|
|
|
|
///
|
|
|
|
/// This method may be called multiple times for any number of components.
|
|
|
|
///
|
2024-09-15 14:37:32 +00:00
|
|
|
/// This is the inverse of [`deny_component`](Self::deny_component).
|
bevy_scene: Add `SceneFilter` (#6793)
# Objective
Currently, `DynamicScene`s extract all components listed in the given
(or the world's) type registry. This acts as a quasi-filter of sorts.
However, it can be troublesome to use effectively and lacks decent
control.
For example, say you need to serialize only the following component over
the network:
```rust
#[derive(Reflect, Component, Default)]
#[reflect(Component)]
struct NPC {
name: Option<String>
}
```
To do this, you'd need to:
1. Create a new `AppTypeRegistry`
2. Register `NPC`
3. Register `Option<String>`
If we skip Step 3, then the entire scene might fail to serialize as
`Option<String>` requires registration.
Not only is this annoying and easy to forget, but it can leave users
with an impossible task: serializing a third-party type that contains
private types.
Generally, the third-party crate will register their private types
within a plugin so the user doesn't need to do it themselves. However,
this means we are now unable to serialize _just_ that type— we're forced
to allow everything!
## Solution
Add the `SceneFilter` enum for filtering components to extract.
This filter can be used to optionally allow or deny entire sets of
components/resources. With the `DynamicSceneBuilder`, users have more
control over how their `DynamicScene`s are built.
To only serialize a subset of components, use the `allow` method:
```rust
let scene = builder
.allow::<ComponentA>()
.allow::<ComponentB>()
.extract_entity(entity)
.build();
```
To serialize everything _but_ a subset of components, use the `deny`
method:
```rust
let scene = builder
.deny::<ComponentA>()
.deny::<ComponentB>()
.extract_entity(entity)
.build();
```
Or create a custom filter:
```rust
let components = HashSet::from([type_id]);
let filter = SceneFilter::Allowlist(components);
// let filter = SceneFilter::Denylist(components);
let scene = builder
.with_filter(Some(filter))
.extract_entity(entity)
.build();
```
Similar operations exist for resources:
<details>
<summary>View Resource Methods</summary>
To only serialize a subset of resources, use the `allow_resource`
method:
```rust
let scene = builder
.allow_resource::<ResourceA>()
.extract_resources()
.build();
```
To serialize everything _but_ a subset of resources, use the
`deny_resource` method:
```rust
let scene = builder
.deny_resource::<ResourceA>()
.extract_resources()
.build();
```
Or create a custom filter:
```rust
let resources = HashSet::from([type_id]);
let filter = SceneFilter::Allowlist(resources);
// let filter = SceneFilter::Denylist(resources);
let scene = builder
.with_resource_filter(Some(filter))
.extract_resources()
.build();
```
</details>
### Open Questions
- [x] ~~`allow` and `deny` are mutually exclusive. Currently, they
overwrite each other. Should this instead be a panic?~~ Took @soqb's
suggestion and made it so that the opposing method simply removes that
type from the list.
- [x] ~~`DynamicSceneBuilder` extracts entity data as soon as
`extract_entity`/`extract_entities` is called. Should this behavior
instead be moved to the `build` method to prevent ordering mixups (e.g.
`.allow::<Foo>().extract_entity(entity)` vs
`.extract_entity(entity).allow::<Foo>()`)? The tradeoff would be
iterating over the given entities twice: once at extraction and again at
build.~~ Based on the feedback from @Testare it sounds like it might be
better to just keep the current functionality (if anything we can open a
separate PR that adds deferred methods for extraction, so the
choice/performance hit is up to the user).
- [ ] An alternative might be to remove the filter from
`DynamicSceneBuilder` and have it as a separate parameter to the
extraction methods (either in the existing ones or as added
`extract_entity_with_filter`-type methods). Is this preferable?
- [x] ~~Should we include constructors that include common types to
allow/deny? For example, a `SceneFilter::standard_allowlist` that
includes things like `Parent` and `Children`?~~ Consensus suggests we
should. I may split this out into a followup PR, though.
- [x] ~~Should we add the ability to remove types from the filter
regardless of whether an allowlist or denylist (e.g.
`filter.remove::<Foo>()`)?~~ See the first list item
- [x] ~~Should `SceneFilter` be an enum? Would it make more sense as a
struct that contains an `is_denylist` boolean?~~ With the added
`SceneFilter::None` state (replacing the need to wrap in an `Option` or
rely on an empty `Denylist`), it seems an enum is better suited now
- [x] ~~Bikeshed: Do we like the naming convention? Should we instead
use `include`/`exclude` terminology?~~ Sounds like we're sticking with
`allow`/`deny`!
- [x] ~~Does this feature need a new example? Do we simply include it in
the existing one (maybe even as a comment?)? Should this be done in a
followup PR instead?~~ Example will be added in a followup PR
### Followup Tasks
- [ ] Add a dedicated `SceneFilter` example
- [ ] Possibly add default types to the filter (e.g. deny things like
`ComputedVisibility`, allow `Parent`, etc)
---
## Changelog
- Added the `SceneFilter` enum for filtering components and resources
when building a `DynamicScene`
- Added methods:
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::with_filter`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::allow`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::deny`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::allow_all`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::deny_all`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::with_resource_filter`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::allow_resource`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::deny_resource`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::allow_all_resources`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::deny_all_resources`
- Removed methods:
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::from_world_with_type_registry`
- `DynamicScene::from_scene` and `DynamicScene::from_world` no longer
require an `AppTypeRegistry` reference
## Migration Guide
- `DynamicScene::from_scene` and `DynamicScene::from_world` no longer
require an `AppTypeRegistry` reference:
```rust
// OLD
let registry = world.resource::<AppTypeRegistry>();
let dynamic_scene = DynamicScene::from_world(&world, registry);
// let dynamic_scene = DynamicScene::from_scene(&scene, registry);
// NEW
let dynamic_scene = DynamicScene::from_world(&world);
// let dynamic_scene = DynamicScene::from_scene(&scene);
```
- Removed `DynamicSceneBuilder::from_world_with_type_registry`. Now the
registry is automatically taken from the given world:
```rust
// OLD
let registry = world.resource::<AppTypeRegistry>();
let builder = DynamicSceneBuilder::from_world_with_type_registry(&world,
registry);
// NEW
let builder = DynamicSceneBuilder::from_world(&world);
```
2023-07-06 21:04:26 +00:00
|
|
|
/// If `T` has already been denied, then it will be removed from the denylist.
|
2023-10-09 19:46:17 +00:00
|
|
|
#[must_use]
|
2024-09-15 14:37:32 +00:00
|
|
|
pub fn allow_component<T: Component>(mut self) -> Self {
|
2023-10-09 19:46:17 +00:00
|
|
|
self.component_filter = self.component_filter.allow::<T>();
|
bevy_scene: Add `SceneFilter` (#6793)
# Objective
Currently, `DynamicScene`s extract all components listed in the given
(or the world's) type registry. This acts as a quasi-filter of sorts.
However, it can be troublesome to use effectively and lacks decent
control.
For example, say you need to serialize only the following component over
the network:
```rust
#[derive(Reflect, Component, Default)]
#[reflect(Component)]
struct NPC {
name: Option<String>
}
```
To do this, you'd need to:
1. Create a new `AppTypeRegistry`
2. Register `NPC`
3. Register `Option<String>`
If we skip Step 3, then the entire scene might fail to serialize as
`Option<String>` requires registration.
Not only is this annoying and easy to forget, but it can leave users
with an impossible task: serializing a third-party type that contains
private types.
Generally, the third-party crate will register their private types
within a plugin so the user doesn't need to do it themselves. However,
this means we are now unable to serialize _just_ that type— we're forced
to allow everything!
## Solution
Add the `SceneFilter` enum for filtering components to extract.
This filter can be used to optionally allow or deny entire sets of
components/resources. With the `DynamicSceneBuilder`, users have more
control over how their `DynamicScene`s are built.
To only serialize a subset of components, use the `allow` method:
```rust
let scene = builder
.allow::<ComponentA>()
.allow::<ComponentB>()
.extract_entity(entity)
.build();
```
To serialize everything _but_ a subset of components, use the `deny`
method:
```rust
let scene = builder
.deny::<ComponentA>()
.deny::<ComponentB>()
.extract_entity(entity)
.build();
```
Or create a custom filter:
```rust
let components = HashSet::from([type_id]);
let filter = SceneFilter::Allowlist(components);
// let filter = SceneFilter::Denylist(components);
let scene = builder
.with_filter(Some(filter))
.extract_entity(entity)
.build();
```
Similar operations exist for resources:
<details>
<summary>View Resource Methods</summary>
To only serialize a subset of resources, use the `allow_resource`
method:
```rust
let scene = builder
.allow_resource::<ResourceA>()
.extract_resources()
.build();
```
To serialize everything _but_ a subset of resources, use the
`deny_resource` method:
```rust
let scene = builder
.deny_resource::<ResourceA>()
.extract_resources()
.build();
```
Or create a custom filter:
```rust
let resources = HashSet::from([type_id]);
let filter = SceneFilter::Allowlist(resources);
// let filter = SceneFilter::Denylist(resources);
let scene = builder
.with_resource_filter(Some(filter))
.extract_resources()
.build();
```
</details>
### Open Questions
- [x] ~~`allow` and `deny` are mutually exclusive. Currently, they
overwrite each other. Should this instead be a panic?~~ Took @soqb's
suggestion and made it so that the opposing method simply removes that
type from the list.
- [x] ~~`DynamicSceneBuilder` extracts entity data as soon as
`extract_entity`/`extract_entities` is called. Should this behavior
instead be moved to the `build` method to prevent ordering mixups (e.g.
`.allow::<Foo>().extract_entity(entity)` vs
`.extract_entity(entity).allow::<Foo>()`)? The tradeoff would be
iterating over the given entities twice: once at extraction and again at
build.~~ Based on the feedback from @Testare it sounds like it might be
better to just keep the current functionality (if anything we can open a
separate PR that adds deferred methods for extraction, so the
choice/performance hit is up to the user).
- [ ] An alternative might be to remove the filter from
`DynamicSceneBuilder` and have it as a separate parameter to the
extraction methods (either in the existing ones or as added
`extract_entity_with_filter`-type methods). Is this preferable?
- [x] ~~Should we include constructors that include common types to
allow/deny? For example, a `SceneFilter::standard_allowlist` that
includes things like `Parent` and `Children`?~~ Consensus suggests we
should. I may split this out into a followup PR, though.
- [x] ~~Should we add the ability to remove types from the filter
regardless of whether an allowlist or denylist (e.g.
`filter.remove::<Foo>()`)?~~ See the first list item
- [x] ~~Should `SceneFilter` be an enum? Would it make more sense as a
struct that contains an `is_denylist` boolean?~~ With the added
`SceneFilter::None` state (replacing the need to wrap in an `Option` or
rely on an empty `Denylist`), it seems an enum is better suited now
- [x] ~~Bikeshed: Do we like the naming convention? Should we instead
use `include`/`exclude` terminology?~~ Sounds like we're sticking with
`allow`/`deny`!
- [x] ~~Does this feature need a new example? Do we simply include it in
the existing one (maybe even as a comment?)? Should this be done in a
followup PR instead?~~ Example will be added in a followup PR
### Followup Tasks
- [ ] Add a dedicated `SceneFilter` example
- [ ] Possibly add default types to the filter (e.g. deny things like
`ComputedVisibility`, allow `Parent`, etc)
---
## Changelog
- Added the `SceneFilter` enum for filtering components and resources
when building a `DynamicScene`
- Added methods:
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::with_filter`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::allow`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::deny`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::allow_all`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::deny_all`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::with_resource_filter`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::allow_resource`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::deny_resource`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::allow_all_resources`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::deny_all_resources`
- Removed methods:
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::from_world_with_type_registry`
- `DynamicScene::from_scene` and `DynamicScene::from_world` no longer
require an `AppTypeRegistry` reference
## Migration Guide
- `DynamicScene::from_scene` and `DynamicScene::from_world` no longer
require an `AppTypeRegistry` reference:
```rust
// OLD
let registry = world.resource::<AppTypeRegistry>();
let dynamic_scene = DynamicScene::from_world(&world, registry);
// let dynamic_scene = DynamicScene::from_scene(&scene, registry);
// NEW
let dynamic_scene = DynamicScene::from_world(&world);
// let dynamic_scene = DynamicScene::from_scene(&scene);
```
- Removed `DynamicSceneBuilder::from_world_with_type_registry`. Now the
registry is automatically taken from the given world:
```rust
// OLD
let registry = world.resource::<AppTypeRegistry>();
let builder = DynamicSceneBuilder::from_world_with_type_registry(&world,
registry);
// NEW
let builder = DynamicSceneBuilder::from_world(&world);
```
2023-07-06 21:04:26 +00:00
|
|
|
self
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/// Denies the given component type, `T`, from being included in the generated scene.
|
|
|
|
///
|
|
|
|
/// This method may be called multiple times for any number of components.
|
|
|
|
///
|
2024-09-15 14:37:32 +00:00
|
|
|
/// This is the inverse of [`allow_component`](Self::allow_component).
|
bevy_scene: Add `SceneFilter` (#6793)
# Objective
Currently, `DynamicScene`s extract all components listed in the given
(or the world's) type registry. This acts as a quasi-filter of sorts.
However, it can be troublesome to use effectively and lacks decent
control.
For example, say you need to serialize only the following component over
the network:
```rust
#[derive(Reflect, Component, Default)]
#[reflect(Component)]
struct NPC {
name: Option<String>
}
```
To do this, you'd need to:
1. Create a new `AppTypeRegistry`
2. Register `NPC`
3. Register `Option<String>`
If we skip Step 3, then the entire scene might fail to serialize as
`Option<String>` requires registration.
Not only is this annoying and easy to forget, but it can leave users
with an impossible task: serializing a third-party type that contains
private types.
Generally, the third-party crate will register their private types
within a plugin so the user doesn't need to do it themselves. However,
this means we are now unable to serialize _just_ that type— we're forced
to allow everything!
## Solution
Add the `SceneFilter` enum for filtering components to extract.
This filter can be used to optionally allow or deny entire sets of
components/resources. With the `DynamicSceneBuilder`, users have more
control over how their `DynamicScene`s are built.
To only serialize a subset of components, use the `allow` method:
```rust
let scene = builder
.allow::<ComponentA>()
.allow::<ComponentB>()
.extract_entity(entity)
.build();
```
To serialize everything _but_ a subset of components, use the `deny`
method:
```rust
let scene = builder
.deny::<ComponentA>()
.deny::<ComponentB>()
.extract_entity(entity)
.build();
```
Or create a custom filter:
```rust
let components = HashSet::from([type_id]);
let filter = SceneFilter::Allowlist(components);
// let filter = SceneFilter::Denylist(components);
let scene = builder
.with_filter(Some(filter))
.extract_entity(entity)
.build();
```
Similar operations exist for resources:
<details>
<summary>View Resource Methods</summary>
To only serialize a subset of resources, use the `allow_resource`
method:
```rust
let scene = builder
.allow_resource::<ResourceA>()
.extract_resources()
.build();
```
To serialize everything _but_ a subset of resources, use the
`deny_resource` method:
```rust
let scene = builder
.deny_resource::<ResourceA>()
.extract_resources()
.build();
```
Or create a custom filter:
```rust
let resources = HashSet::from([type_id]);
let filter = SceneFilter::Allowlist(resources);
// let filter = SceneFilter::Denylist(resources);
let scene = builder
.with_resource_filter(Some(filter))
.extract_resources()
.build();
```
</details>
### Open Questions
- [x] ~~`allow` and `deny` are mutually exclusive. Currently, they
overwrite each other. Should this instead be a panic?~~ Took @soqb's
suggestion and made it so that the opposing method simply removes that
type from the list.
- [x] ~~`DynamicSceneBuilder` extracts entity data as soon as
`extract_entity`/`extract_entities` is called. Should this behavior
instead be moved to the `build` method to prevent ordering mixups (e.g.
`.allow::<Foo>().extract_entity(entity)` vs
`.extract_entity(entity).allow::<Foo>()`)? The tradeoff would be
iterating over the given entities twice: once at extraction and again at
build.~~ Based on the feedback from @Testare it sounds like it might be
better to just keep the current functionality (if anything we can open a
separate PR that adds deferred methods for extraction, so the
choice/performance hit is up to the user).
- [ ] An alternative might be to remove the filter from
`DynamicSceneBuilder` and have it as a separate parameter to the
extraction methods (either in the existing ones or as added
`extract_entity_with_filter`-type methods). Is this preferable?
- [x] ~~Should we include constructors that include common types to
allow/deny? For example, a `SceneFilter::standard_allowlist` that
includes things like `Parent` and `Children`?~~ Consensus suggests we
should. I may split this out into a followup PR, though.
- [x] ~~Should we add the ability to remove types from the filter
regardless of whether an allowlist or denylist (e.g.
`filter.remove::<Foo>()`)?~~ See the first list item
- [x] ~~Should `SceneFilter` be an enum? Would it make more sense as a
struct that contains an `is_denylist` boolean?~~ With the added
`SceneFilter::None` state (replacing the need to wrap in an `Option` or
rely on an empty `Denylist`), it seems an enum is better suited now
- [x] ~~Bikeshed: Do we like the naming convention? Should we instead
use `include`/`exclude` terminology?~~ Sounds like we're sticking with
`allow`/`deny`!
- [x] ~~Does this feature need a new example? Do we simply include it in
the existing one (maybe even as a comment?)? Should this be done in a
followup PR instead?~~ Example will be added in a followup PR
### Followup Tasks
- [ ] Add a dedicated `SceneFilter` example
- [ ] Possibly add default types to the filter (e.g. deny things like
`ComputedVisibility`, allow `Parent`, etc)
---
## Changelog
- Added the `SceneFilter` enum for filtering components and resources
when building a `DynamicScene`
- Added methods:
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::with_filter`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::allow`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::deny`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::allow_all`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::deny_all`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::with_resource_filter`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::allow_resource`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::deny_resource`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::allow_all_resources`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::deny_all_resources`
- Removed methods:
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::from_world_with_type_registry`
- `DynamicScene::from_scene` and `DynamicScene::from_world` no longer
require an `AppTypeRegistry` reference
## Migration Guide
- `DynamicScene::from_scene` and `DynamicScene::from_world` no longer
require an `AppTypeRegistry` reference:
```rust
// OLD
let registry = world.resource::<AppTypeRegistry>();
let dynamic_scene = DynamicScene::from_world(&world, registry);
// let dynamic_scene = DynamicScene::from_scene(&scene, registry);
// NEW
let dynamic_scene = DynamicScene::from_world(&world);
// let dynamic_scene = DynamicScene::from_scene(&scene);
```
- Removed `DynamicSceneBuilder::from_world_with_type_registry`. Now the
registry is automatically taken from the given world:
```rust
// OLD
let registry = world.resource::<AppTypeRegistry>();
let builder = DynamicSceneBuilder::from_world_with_type_registry(&world,
registry);
// NEW
let builder = DynamicSceneBuilder::from_world(&world);
```
2023-07-06 21:04:26 +00:00
|
|
|
/// If `T` has already been allowed, then it will be removed from the allowlist.
|
2023-10-09 19:46:17 +00:00
|
|
|
#[must_use]
|
2024-09-15 14:37:32 +00:00
|
|
|
pub fn deny_component<T: Component>(mut self) -> Self {
|
2023-10-09 19:46:17 +00:00
|
|
|
self.component_filter = self.component_filter.deny::<T>();
|
bevy_scene: Add `SceneFilter` (#6793)
# Objective
Currently, `DynamicScene`s extract all components listed in the given
(or the world's) type registry. This acts as a quasi-filter of sorts.
However, it can be troublesome to use effectively and lacks decent
control.
For example, say you need to serialize only the following component over
the network:
```rust
#[derive(Reflect, Component, Default)]
#[reflect(Component)]
struct NPC {
name: Option<String>
}
```
To do this, you'd need to:
1. Create a new `AppTypeRegistry`
2. Register `NPC`
3. Register `Option<String>`
If we skip Step 3, then the entire scene might fail to serialize as
`Option<String>` requires registration.
Not only is this annoying and easy to forget, but it can leave users
with an impossible task: serializing a third-party type that contains
private types.
Generally, the third-party crate will register their private types
within a plugin so the user doesn't need to do it themselves. However,
this means we are now unable to serialize _just_ that type— we're forced
to allow everything!
## Solution
Add the `SceneFilter` enum for filtering components to extract.
This filter can be used to optionally allow or deny entire sets of
components/resources. With the `DynamicSceneBuilder`, users have more
control over how their `DynamicScene`s are built.
To only serialize a subset of components, use the `allow` method:
```rust
let scene = builder
.allow::<ComponentA>()
.allow::<ComponentB>()
.extract_entity(entity)
.build();
```
To serialize everything _but_ a subset of components, use the `deny`
method:
```rust
let scene = builder
.deny::<ComponentA>()
.deny::<ComponentB>()
.extract_entity(entity)
.build();
```
Or create a custom filter:
```rust
let components = HashSet::from([type_id]);
let filter = SceneFilter::Allowlist(components);
// let filter = SceneFilter::Denylist(components);
let scene = builder
.with_filter(Some(filter))
.extract_entity(entity)
.build();
```
Similar operations exist for resources:
<details>
<summary>View Resource Methods</summary>
To only serialize a subset of resources, use the `allow_resource`
method:
```rust
let scene = builder
.allow_resource::<ResourceA>()
.extract_resources()
.build();
```
To serialize everything _but_ a subset of resources, use the
`deny_resource` method:
```rust
let scene = builder
.deny_resource::<ResourceA>()
.extract_resources()
.build();
```
Or create a custom filter:
```rust
let resources = HashSet::from([type_id]);
let filter = SceneFilter::Allowlist(resources);
// let filter = SceneFilter::Denylist(resources);
let scene = builder
.with_resource_filter(Some(filter))
.extract_resources()
.build();
```
</details>
### Open Questions
- [x] ~~`allow` and `deny` are mutually exclusive. Currently, they
overwrite each other. Should this instead be a panic?~~ Took @soqb's
suggestion and made it so that the opposing method simply removes that
type from the list.
- [x] ~~`DynamicSceneBuilder` extracts entity data as soon as
`extract_entity`/`extract_entities` is called. Should this behavior
instead be moved to the `build` method to prevent ordering mixups (e.g.
`.allow::<Foo>().extract_entity(entity)` vs
`.extract_entity(entity).allow::<Foo>()`)? The tradeoff would be
iterating over the given entities twice: once at extraction and again at
build.~~ Based on the feedback from @Testare it sounds like it might be
better to just keep the current functionality (if anything we can open a
separate PR that adds deferred methods for extraction, so the
choice/performance hit is up to the user).
- [ ] An alternative might be to remove the filter from
`DynamicSceneBuilder` and have it as a separate parameter to the
extraction methods (either in the existing ones or as added
`extract_entity_with_filter`-type methods). Is this preferable?
- [x] ~~Should we include constructors that include common types to
allow/deny? For example, a `SceneFilter::standard_allowlist` that
includes things like `Parent` and `Children`?~~ Consensus suggests we
should. I may split this out into a followup PR, though.
- [x] ~~Should we add the ability to remove types from the filter
regardless of whether an allowlist or denylist (e.g.
`filter.remove::<Foo>()`)?~~ See the first list item
- [x] ~~Should `SceneFilter` be an enum? Would it make more sense as a
struct that contains an `is_denylist` boolean?~~ With the added
`SceneFilter::None` state (replacing the need to wrap in an `Option` or
rely on an empty `Denylist`), it seems an enum is better suited now
- [x] ~~Bikeshed: Do we like the naming convention? Should we instead
use `include`/`exclude` terminology?~~ Sounds like we're sticking with
`allow`/`deny`!
- [x] ~~Does this feature need a new example? Do we simply include it in
the existing one (maybe even as a comment?)? Should this be done in a
followup PR instead?~~ Example will be added in a followup PR
### Followup Tasks
- [ ] Add a dedicated `SceneFilter` example
- [ ] Possibly add default types to the filter (e.g. deny things like
`ComputedVisibility`, allow `Parent`, etc)
---
## Changelog
- Added the `SceneFilter` enum for filtering components and resources
when building a `DynamicScene`
- Added methods:
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::with_filter`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::allow`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::deny`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::allow_all`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::deny_all`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::with_resource_filter`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::allow_resource`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::deny_resource`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::allow_all_resources`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::deny_all_resources`
- Removed methods:
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::from_world_with_type_registry`
- `DynamicScene::from_scene` and `DynamicScene::from_world` no longer
require an `AppTypeRegistry` reference
## Migration Guide
- `DynamicScene::from_scene` and `DynamicScene::from_world` no longer
require an `AppTypeRegistry` reference:
```rust
// OLD
let registry = world.resource::<AppTypeRegistry>();
let dynamic_scene = DynamicScene::from_world(&world, registry);
// let dynamic_scene = DynamicScene::from_scene(&scene, registry);
// NEW
let dynamic_scene = DynamicScene::from_world(&world);
// let dynamic_scene = DynamicScene::from_scene(&scene);
```
- Removed `DynamicSceneBuilder::from_world_with_type_registry`. Now the
registry is automatically taken from the given world:
```rust
// OLD
let registry = world.resource::<AppTypeRegistry>();
let builder = DynamicSceneBuilder::from_world_with_type_registry(&world,
registry);
// NEW
let builder = DynamicSceneBuilder::from_world(&world);
```
2023-07-06 21:04:26 +00:00
|
|
|
self
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/// Updates the filter to allow all component types.
|
|
|
|
///
|
|
|
|
/// This is useful for resetting the filter so that types may be selectively [denied].
|
|
|
|
///
|
2024-09-15 14:37:32 +00:00
|
|
|
/// [denied]: Self::deny_component
|
2023-10-09 19:46:17 +00:00
|
|
|
#[must_use]
|
2024-09-15 14:37:32 +00:00
|
|
|
pub fn allow_all_components(mut self) -> Self {
|
bevy_scene: Add `SceneFilter` (#6793)
# Objective
Currently, `DynamicScene`s extract all components listed in the given
(or the world's) type registry. This acts as a quasi-filter of sorts.
However, it can be troublesome to use effectively and lacks decent
control.
For example, say you need to serialize only the following component over
the network:
```rust
#[derive(Reflect, Component, Default)]
#[reflect(Component)]
struct NPC {
name: Option<String>
}
```
To do this, you'd need to:
1. Create a new `AppTypeRegistry`
2. Register `NPC`
3. Register `Option<String>`
If we skip Step 3, then the entire scene might fail to serialize as
`Option<String>` requires registration.
Not only is this annoying and easy to forget, but it can leave users
with an impossible task: serializing a third-party type that contains
private types.
Generally, the third-party crate will register their private types
within a plugin so the user doesn't need to do it themselves. However,
this means we are now unable to serialize _just_ that type— we're forced
to allow everything!
## Solution
Add the `SceneFilter` enum for filtering components to extract.
This filter can be used to optionally allow or deny entire sets of
components/resources. With the `DynamicSceneBuilder`, users have more
control over how their `DynamicScene`s are built.
To only serialize a subset of components, use the `allow` method:
```rust
let scene = builder
.allow::<ComponentA>()
.allow::<ComponentB>()
.extract_entity(entity)
.build();
```
To serialize everything _but_ a subset of components, use the `deny`
method:
```rust
let scene = builder
.deny::<ComponentA>()
.deny::<ComponentB>()
.extract_entity(entity)
.build();
```
Or create a custom filter:
```rust
let components = HashSet::from([type_id]);
let filter = SceneFilter::Allowlist(components);
// let filter = SceneFilter::Denylist(components);
let scene = builder
.with_filter(Some(filter))
.extract_entity(entity)
.build();
```
Similar operations exist for resources:
<details>
<summary>View Resource Methods</summary>
To only serialize a subset of resources, use the `allow_resource`
method:
```rust
let scene = builder
.allow_resource::<ResourceA>()
.extract_resources()
.build();
```
To serialize everything _but_ a subset of resources, use the
`deny_resource` method:
```rust
let scene = builder
.deny_resource::<ResourceA>()
.extract_resources()
.build();
```
Or create a custom filter:
```rust
let resources = HashSet::from([type_id]);
let filter = SceneFilter::Allowlist(resources);
// let filter = SceneFilter::Denylist(resources);
let scene = builder
.with_resource_filter(Some(filter))
.extract_resources()
.build();
```
</details>
### Open Questions
- [x] ~~`allow` and `deny` are mutually exclusive. Currently, they
overwrite each other. Should this instead be a panic?~~ Took @soqb's
suggestion and made it so that the opposing method simply removes that
type from the list.
- [x] ~~`DynamicSceneBuilder` extracts entity data as soon as
`extract_entity`/`extract_entities` is called. Should this behavior
instead be moved to the `build` method to prevent ordering mixups (e.g.
`.allow::<Foo>().extract_entity(entity)` vs
`.extract_entity(entity).allow::<Foo>()`)? The tradeoff would be
iterating over the given entities twice: once at extraction and again at
build.~~ Based on the feedback from @Testare it sounds like it might be
better to just keep the current functionality (if anything we can open a
separate PR that adds deferred methods for extraction, so the
choice/performance hit is up to the user).
- [ ] An alternative might be to remove the filter from
`DynamicSceneBuilder` and have it as a separate parameter to the
extraction methods (either in the existing ones or as added
`extract_entity_with_filter`-type methods). Is this preferable?
- [x] ~~Should we include constructors that include common types to
allow/deny? For example, a `SceneFilter::standard_allowlist` that
includes things like `Parent` and `Children`?~~ Consensus suggests we
should. I may split this out into a followup PR, though.
- [x] ~~Should we add the ability to remove types from the filter
regardless of whether an allowlist or denylist (e.g.
`filter.remove::<Foo>()`)?~~ See the first list item
- [x] ~~Should `SceneFilter` be an enum? Would it make more sense as a
struct that contains an `is_denylist` boolean?~~ With the added
`SceneFilter::None` state (replacing the need to wrap in an `Option` or
rely on an empty `Denylist`), it seems an enum is better suited now
- [x] ~~Bikeshed: Do we like the naming convention? Should we instead
use `include`/`exclude` terminology?~~ Sounds like we're sticking with
`allow`/`deny`!
- [x] ~~Does this feature need a new example? Do we simply include it in
the existing one (maybe even as a comment?)? Should this be done in a
followup PR instead?~~ Example will be added in a followup PR
### Followup Tasks
- [ ] Add a dedicated `SceneFilter` example
- [ ] Possibly add default types to the filter (e.g. deny things like
`ComputedVisibility`, allow `Parent`, etc)
---
## Changelog
- Added the `SceneFilter` enum for filtering components and resources
when building a `DynamicScene`
- Added methods:
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::with_filter`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::allow`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::deny`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::allow_all`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::deny_all`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::with_resource_filter`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::allow_resource`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::deny_resource`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::allow_all_resources`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::deny_all_resources`
- Removed methods:
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::from_world_with_type_registry`
- `DynamicScene::from_scene` and `DynamicScene::from_world` no longer
require an `AppTypeRegistry` reference
## Migration Guide
- `DynamicScene::from_scene` and `DynamicScene::from_world` no longer
require an `AppTypeRegistry` reference:
```rust
// OLD
let registry = world.resource::<AppTypeRegistry>();
let dynamic_scene = DynamicScene::from_world(&world, registry);
// let dynamic_scene = DynamicScene::from_scene(&scene, registry);
// NEW
let dynamic_scene = DynamicScene::from_world(&world);
// let dynamic_scene = DynamicScene::from_scene(&scene);
```
- Removed `DynamicSceneBuilder::from_world_with_type_registry`. Now the
registry is automatically taken from the given world:
```rust
// OLD
let registry = world.resource::<AppTypeRegistry>();
let builder = DynamicSceneBuilder::from_world_with_type_registry(&world,
registry);
// NEW
let builder = DynamicSceneBuilder::from_world(&world);
```
2023-07-06 21:04:26 +00:00
|
|
|
self.component_filter = SceneFilter::allow_all();
|
|
|
|
self
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/// Updates the filter to deny all component types.
|
|
|
|
///
|
|
|
|
/// This is useful for resetting the filter so that types may be selectively [allowed].
|
|
|
|
///
|
2024-09-15 14:37:32 +00:00
|
|
|
/// [allowed]: Self::allow_component
|
2023-10-09 19:46:17 +00:00
|
|
|
#[must_use]
|
2024-09-15 14:37:32 +00:00
|
|
|
pub fn deny_all_components(mut self) -> Self {
|
bevy_scene: Add `SceneFilter` (#6793)
# Objective
Currently, `DynamicScene`s extract all components listed in the given
(or the world's) type registry. This acts as a quasi-filter of sorts.
However, it can be troublesome to use effectively and lacks decent
control.
For example, say you need to serialize only the following component over
the network:
```rust
#[derive(Reflect, Component, Default)]
#[reflect(Component)]
struct NPC {
name: Option<String>
}
```
To do this, you'd need to:
1. Create a new `AppTypeRegistry`
2. Register `NPC`
3. Register `Option<String>`
If we skip Step 3, then the entire scene might fail to serialize as
`Option<String>` requires registration.
Not only is this annoying and easy to forget, but it can leave users
with an impossible task: serializing a third-party type that contains
private types.
Generally, the third-party crate will register their private types
within a plugin so the user doesn't need to do it themselves. However,
this means we are now unable to serialize _just_ that type— we're forced
to allow everything!
## Solution
Add the `SceneFilter` enum for filtering components to extract.
This filter can be used to optionally allow or deny entire sets of
components/resources. With the `DynamicSceneBuilder`, users have more
control over how their `DynamicScene`s are built.
To only serialize a subset of components, use the `allow` method:
```rust
let scene = builder
.allow::<ComponentA>()
.allow::<ComponentB>()
.extract_entity(entity)
.build();
```
To serialize everything _but_ a subset of components, use the `deny`
method:
```rust
let scene = builder
.deny::<ComponentA>()
.deny::<ComponentB>()
.extract_entity(entity)
.build();
```
Or create a custom filter:
```rust
let components = HashSet::from([type_id]);
let filter = SceneFilter::Allowlist(components);
// let filter = SceneFilter::Denylist(components);
let scene = builder
.with_filter(Some(filter))
.extract_entity(entity)
.build();
```
Similar operations exist for resources:
<details>
<summary>View Resource Methods</summary>
To only serialize a subset of resources, use the `allow_resource`
method:
```rust
let scene = builder
.allow_resource::<ResourceA>()
.extract_resources()
.build();
```
To serialize everything _but_ a subset of resources, use the
`deny_resource` method:
```rust
let scene = builder
.deny_resource::<ResourceA>()
.extract_resources()
.build();
```
Or create a custom filter:
```rust
let resources = HashSet::from([type_id]);
let filter = SceneFilter::Allowlist(resources);
// let filter = SceneFilter::Denylist(resources);
let scene = builder
.with_resource_filter(Some(filter))
.extract_resources()
.build();
```
</details>
### Open Questions
- [x] ~~`allow` and `deny` are mutually exclusive. Currently, they
overwrite each other. Should this instead be a panic?~~ Took @soqb's
suggestion and made it so that the opposing method simply removes that
type from the list.
- [x] ~~`DynamicSceneBuilder` extracts entity data as soon as
`extract_entity`/`extract_entities` is called. Should this behavior
instead be moved to the `build` method to prevent ordering mixups (e.g.
`.allow::<Foo>().extract_entity(entity)` vs
`.extract_entity(entity).allow::<Foo>()`)? The tradeoff would be
iterating over the given entities twice: once at extraction and again at
build.~~ Based on the feedback from @Testare it sounds like it might be
better to just keep the current functionality (if anything we can open a
separate PR that adds deferred methods for extraction, so the
choice/performance hit is up to the user).
- [ ] An alternative might be to remove the filter from
`DynamicSceneBuilder` and have it as a separate parameter to the
extraction methods (either in the existing ones or as added
`extract_entity_with_filter`-type methods). Is this preferable?
- [x] ~~Should we include constructors that include common types to
allow/deny? For example, a `SceneFilter::standard_allowlist` that
includes things like `Parent` and `Children`?~~ Consensus suggests we
should. I may split this out into a followup PR, though.
- [x] ~~Should we add the ability to remove types from the filter
regardless of whether an allowlist or denylist (e.g.
`filter.remove::<Foo>()`)?~~ See the first list item
- [x] ~~Should `SceneFilter` be an enum? Would it make more sense as a
struct that contains an `is_denylist` boolean?~~ With the added
`SceneFilter::None` state (replacing the need to wrap in an `Option` or
rely on an empty `Denylist`), it seems an enum is better suited now
- [x] ~~Bikeshed: Do we like the naming convention? Should we instead
use `include`/`exclude` terminology?~~ Sounds like we're sticking with
`allow`/`deny`!
- [x] ~~Does this feature need a new example? Do we simply include it in
the existing one (maybe even as a comment?)? Should this be done in a
followup PR instead?~~ Example will be added in a followup PR
### Followup Tasks
- [ ] Add a dedicated `SceneFilter` example
- [ ] Possibly add default types to the filter (e.g. deny things like
`ComputedVisibility`, allow `Parent`, etc)
---
## Changelog
- Added the `SceneFilter` enum for filtering components and resources
when building a `DynamicScene`
- Added methods:
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::with_filter`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::allow`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::deny`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::allow_all`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::deny_all`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::with_resource_filter`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::allow_resource`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::deny_resource`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::allow_all_resources`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::deny_all_resources`
- Removed methods:
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::from_world_with_type_registry`
- `DynamicScene::from_scene` and `DynamicScene::from_world` no longer
require an `AppTypeRegistry` reference
## Migration Guide
- `DynamicScene::from_scene` and `DynamicScene::from_world` no longer
require an `AppTypeRegistry` reference:
```rust
// OLD
let registry = world.resource::<AppTypeRegistry>();
let dynamic_scene = DynamicScene::from_world(&world, registry);
// let dynamic_scene = DynamicScene::from_scene(&scene, registry);
// NEW
let dynamic_scene = DynamicScene::from_world(&world);
// let dynamic_scene = DynamicScene::from_scene(&scene);
```
- Removed `DynamicSceneBuilder::from_world_with_type_registry`. Now the
registry is automatically taken from the given world:
```rust
// OLD
let registry = world.resource::<AppTypeRegistry>();
let builder = DynamicSceneBuilder::from_world_with_type_registry(&world,
registry);
// NEW
let builder = DynamicSceneBuilder::from_world(&world);
```
2023-07-06 21:04:26 +00:00
|
|
|
self.component_filter = SceneFilter::deny_all();
|
|
|
|
self
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/// Allows the given resource type, `T`, to be included in the generated scene.
|
|
|
|
///
|
|
|
|
/// This method may be called multiple times for any number of resources.
|
|
|
|
///
|
|
|
|
/// This is the inverse of [`deny_resource`](Self::deny_resource).
|
|
|
|
/// If `T` has already been denied, then it will be removed from the denylist.
|
2023-10-09 19:46:17 +00:00
|
|
|
#[must_use]
|
|
|
|
pub fn allow_resource<T: Resource>(mut self) -> Self {
|
|
|
|
self.resource_filter = self.resource_filter.allow::<T>();
|
bevy_scene: Add `SceneFilter` (#6793)
# Objective
Currently, `DynamicScene`s extract all components listed in the given
(or the world's) type registry. This acts as a quasi-filter of sorts.
However, it can be troublesome to use effectively and lacks decent
control.
For example, say you need to serialize only the following component over
the network:
```rust
#[derive(Reflect, Component, Default)]
#[reflect(Component)]
struct NPC {
name: Option<String>
}
```
To do this, you'd need to:
1. Create a new `AppTypeRegistry`
2. Register `NPC`
3. Register `Option<String>`
If we skip Step 3, then the entire scene might fail to serialize as
`Option<String>` requires registration.
Not only is this annoying and easy to forget, but it can leave users
with an impossible task: serializing a third-party type that contains
private types.
Generally, the third-party crate will register their private types
within a plugin so the user doesn't need to do it themselves. However,
this means we are now unable to serialize _just_ that type— we're forced
to allow everything!
## Solution
Add the `SceneFilter` enum for filtering components to extract.
This filter can be used to optionally allow or deny entire sets of
components/resources. With the `DynamicSceneBuilder`, users have more
control over how their `DynamicScene`s are built.
To only serialize a subset of components, use the `allow` method:
```rust
let scene = builder
.allow::<ComponentA>()
.allow::<ComponentB>()
.extract_entity(entity)
.build();
```
To serialize everything _but_ a subset of components, use the `deny`
method:
```rust
let scene = builder
.deny::<ComponentA>()
.deny::<ComponentB>()
.extract_entity(entity)
.build();
```
Or create a custom filter:
```rust
let components = HashSet::from([type_id]);
let filter = SceneFilter::Allowlist(components);
// let filter = SceneFilter::Denylist(components);
let scene = builder
.with_filter(Some(filter))
.extract_entity(entity)
.build();
```
Similar operations exist for resources:
<details>
<summary>View Resource Methods</summary>
To only serialize a subset of resources, use the `allow_resource`
method:
```rust
let scene = builder
.allow_resource::<ResourceA>()
.extract_resources()
.build();
```
To serialize everything _but_ a subset of resources, use the
`deny_resource` method:
```rust
let scene = builder
.deny_resource::<ResourceA>()
.extract_resources()
.build();
```
Or create a custom filter:
```rust
let resources = HashSet::from([type_id]);
let filter = SceneFilter::Allowlist(resources);
// let filter = SceneFilter::Denylist(resources);
let scene = builder
.with_resource_filter(Some(filter))
.extract_resources()
.build();
```
</details>
### Open Questions
- [x] ~~`allow` and `deny` are mutually exclusive. Currently, they
overwrite each other. Should this instead be a panic?~~ Took @soqb's
suggestion and made it so that the opposing method simply removes that
type from the list.
- [x] ~~`DynamicSceneBuilder` extracts entity data as soon as
`extract_entity`/`extract_entities` is called. Should this behavior
instead be moved to the `build` method to prevent ordering mixups (e.g.
`.allow::<Foo>().extract_entity(entity)` vs
`.extract_entity(entity).allow::<Foo>()`)? The tradeoff would be
iterating over the given entities twice: once at extraction and again at
build.~~ Based on the feedback from @Testare it sounds like it might be
better to just keep the current functionality (if anything we can open a
separate PR that adds deferred methods for extraction, so the
choice/performance hit is up to the user).
- [ ] An alternative might be to remove the filter from
`DynamicSceneBuilder` and have it as a separate parameter to the
extraction methods (either in the existing ones or as added
`extract_entity_with_filter`-type methods). Is this preferable?
- [x] ~~Should we include constructors that include common types to
allow/deny? For example, a `SceneFilter::standard_allowlist` that
includes things like `Parent` and `Children`?~~ Consensus suggests we
should. I may split this out into a followup PR, though.
- [x] ~~Should we add the ability to remove types from the filter
regardless of whether an allowlist or denylist (e.g.
`filter.remove::<Foo>()`)?~~ See the first list item
- [x] ~~Should `SceneFilter` be an enum? Would it make more sense as a
struct that contains an `is_denylist` boolean?~~ With the added
`SceneFilter::None` state (replacing the need to wrap in an `Option` or
rely on an empty `Denylist`), it seems an enum is better suited now
- [x] ~~Bikeshed: Do we like the naming convention? Should we instead
use `include`/`exclude` terminology?~~ Sounds like we're sticking with
`allow`/`deny`!
- [x] ~~Does this feature need a new example? Do we simply include it in
the existing one (maybe even as a comment?)? Should this be done in a
followup PR instead?~~ Example will be added in a followup PR
### Followup Tasks
- [ ] Add a dedicated `SceneFilter` example
- [ ] Possibly add default types to the filter (e.g. deny things like
`ComputedVisibility`, allow `Parent`, etc)
---
## Changelog
- Added the `SceneFilter` enum for filtering components and resources
when building a `DynamicScene`
- Added methods:
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::with_filter`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::allow`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::deny`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::allow_all`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::deny_all`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::with_resource_filter`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::allow_resource`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::deny_resource`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::allow_all_resources`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::deny_all_resources`
- Removed methods:
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::from_world_with_type_registry`
- `DynamicScene::from_scene` and `DynamicScene::from_world` no longer
require an `AppTypeRegistry` reference
## Migration Guide
- `DynamicScene::from_scene` and `DynamicScene::from_world` no longer
require an `AppTypeRegistry` reference:
```rust
// OLD
let registry = world.resource::<AppTypeRegistry>();
let dynamic_scene = DynamicScene::from_world(&world, registry);
// let dynamic_scene = DynamicScene::from_scene(&scene, registry);
// NEW
let dynamic_scene = DynamicScene::from_world(&world);
// let dynamic_scene = DynamicScene::from_scene(&scene);
```
- Removed `DynamicSceneBuilder::from_world_with_type_registry`. Now the
registry is automatically taken from the given world:
```rust
// OLD
let registry = world.resource::<AppTypeRegistry>();
let builder = DynamicSceneBuilder::from_world_with_type_registry(&world,
registry);
// NEW
let builder = DynamicSceneBuilder::from_world(&world);
```
2023-07-06 21:04:26 +00:00
|
|
|
self
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/// Denies the given resource type, `T`, from being included in the generated scene.
|
|
|
|
///
|
|
|
|
/// This method may be called multiple times for any number of resources.
|
|
|
|
///
|
|
|
|
/// This is the inverse of [`allow_resource`](Self::allow_resource).
|
|
|
|
/// If `T` has already been allowed, then it will be removed from the allowlist.
|
2023-10-09 19:46:17 +00:00
|
|
|
#[must_use]
|
|
|
|
pub fn deny_resource<T: Resource>(mut self) -> Self {
|
|
|
|
self.resource_filter = self.resource_filter.deny::<T>();
|
bevy_scene: Add `SceneFilter` (#6793)
# Objective
Currently, `DynamicScene`s extract all components listed in the given
(or the world's) type registry. This acts as a quasi-filter of sorts.
However, it can be troublesome to use effectively and lacks decent
control.
For example, say you need to serialize only the following component over
the network:
```rust
#[derive(Reflect, Component, Default)]
#[reflect(Component)]
struct NPC {
name: Option<String>
}
```
To do this, you'd need to:
1. Create a new `AppTypeRegistry`
2. Register `NPC`
3. Register `Option<String>`
If we skip Step 3, then the entire scene might fail to serialize as
`Option<String>` requires registration.
Not only is this annoying and easy to forget, but it can leave users
with an impossible task: serializing a third-party type that contains
private types.
Generally, the third-party crate will register their private types
within a plugin so the user doesn't need to do it themselves. However,
this means we are now unable to serialize _just_ that type— we're forced
to allow everything!
## Solution
Add the `SceneFilter` enum for filtering components to extract.
This filter can be used to optionally allow or deny entire sets of
components/resources. With the `DynamicSceneBuilder`, users have more
control over how their `DynamicScene`s are built.
To only serialize a subset of components, use the `allow` method:
```rust
let scene = builder
.allow::<ComponentA>()
.allow::<ComponentB>()
.extract_entity(entity)
.build();
```
To serialize everything _but_ a subset of components, use the `deny`
method:
```rust
let scene = builder
.deny::<ComponentA>()
.deny::<ComponentB>()
.extract_entity(entity)
.build();
```
Or create a custom filter:
```rust
let components = HashSet::from([type_id]);
let filter = SceneFilter::Allowlist(components);
// let filter = SceneFilter::Denylist(components);
let scene = builder
.with_filter(Some(filter))
.extract_entity(entity)
.build();
```
Similar operations exist for resources:
<details>
<summary>View Resource Methods</summary>
To only serialize a subset of resources, use the `allow_resource`
method:
```rust
let scene = builder
.allow_resource::<ResourceA>()
.extract_resources()
.build();
```
To serialize everything _but_ a subset of resources, use the
`deny_resource` method:
```rust
let scene = builder
.deny_resource::<ResourceA>()
.extract_resources()
.build();
```
Or create a custom filter:
```rust
let resources = HashSet::from([type_id]);
let filter = SceneFilter::Allowlist(resources);
// let filter = SceneFilter::Denylist(resources);
let scene = builder
.with_resource_filter(Some(filter))
.extract_resources()
.build();
```
</details>
### Open Questions
- [x] ~~`allow` and `deny` are mutually exclusive. Currently, they
overwrite each other. Should this instead be a panic?~~ Took @soqb's
suggestion and made it so that the opposing method simply removes that
type from the list.
- [x] ~~`DynamicSceneBuilder` extracts entity data as soon as
`extract_entity`/`extract_entities` is called. Should this behavior
instead be moved to the `build` method to prevent ordering mixups (e.g.
`.allow::<Foo>().extract_entity(entity)` vs
`.extract_entity(entity).allow::<Foo>()`)? The tradeoff would be
iterating over the given entities twice: once at extraction and again at
build.~~ Based on the feedback from @Testare it sounds like it might be
better to just keep the current functionality (if anything we can open a
separate PR that adds deferred methods for extraction, so the
choice/performance hit is up to the user).
- [ ] An alternative might be to remove the filter from
`DynamicSceneBuilder` and have it as a separate parameter to the
extraction methods (either in the existing ones or as added
`extract_entity_with_filter`-type methods). Is this preferable?
- [x] ~~Should we include constructors that include common types to
allow/deny? For example, a `SceneFilter::standard_allowlist` that
includes things like `Parent` and `Children`?~~ Consensus suggests we
should. I may split this out into a followup PR, though.
- [x] ~~Should we add the ability to remove types from the filter
regardless of whether an allowlist or denylist (e.g.
`filter.remove::<Foo>()`)?~~ See the first list item
- [x] ~~Should `SceneFilter` be an enum? Would it make more sense as a
struct that contains an `is_denylist` boolean?~~ With the added
`SceneFilter::None` state (replacing the need to wrap in an `Option` or
rely on an empty `Denylist`), it seems an enum is better suited now
- [x] ~~Bikeshed: Do we like the naming convention? Should we instead
use `include`/`exclude` terminology?~~ Sounds like we're sticking with
`allow`/`deny`!
- [x] ~~Does this feature need a new example? Do we simply include it in
the existing one (maybe even as a comment?)? Should this be done in a
followup PR instead?~~ Example will be added in a followup PR
### Followup Tasks
- [ ] Add a dedicated `SceneFilter` example
- [ ] Possibly add default types to the filter (e.g. deny things like
`ComputedVisibility`, allow `Parent`, etc)
---
## Changelog
- Added the `SceneFilter` enum for filtering components and resources
when building a `DynamicScene`
- Added methods:
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::with_filter`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::allow`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::deny`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::allow_all`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::deny_all`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::with_resource_filter`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::allow_resource`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::deny_resource`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::allow_all_resources`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::deny_all_resources`
- Removed methods:
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::from_world_with_type_registry`
- `DynamicScene::from_scene` and `DynamicScene::from_world` no longer
require an `AppTypeRegistry` reference
## Migration Guide
- `DynamicScene::from_scene` and `DynamicScene::from_world` no longer
require an `AppTypeRegistry` reference:
```rust
// OLD
let registry = world.resource::<AppTypeRegistry>();
let dynamic_scene = DynamicScene::from_world(&world, registry);
// let dynamic_scene = DynamicScene::from_scene(&scene, registry);
// NEW
let dynamic_scene = DynamicScene::from_world(&world);
// let dynamic_scene = DynamicScene::from_scene(&scene);
```
- Removed `DynamicSceneBuilder::from_world_with_type_registry`. Now the
registry is automatically taken from the given world:
```rust
// OLD
let registry = world.resource::<AppTypeRegistry>();
let builder = DynamicSceneBuilder::from_world_with_type_registry(&world,
registry);
// NEW
let builder = DynamicSceneBuilder::from_world(&world);
```
2023-07-06 21:04:26 +00:00
|
|
|
self
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/// Updates the filter to allow all resource types.
|
|
|
|
///
|
|
|
|
/// This is useful for resetting the filter so that types may be selectively [denied].
|
|
|
|
///
|
|
|
|
/// [denied]: Self::deny_resource
|
2023-10-09 19:46:17 +00:00
|
|
|
#[must_use]
|
|
|
|
pub fn allow_all_resources(mut self) -> Self {
|
bevy_scene: Add `SceneFilter` (#6793)
# Objective
Currently, `DynamicScene`s extract all components listed in the given
(or the world's) type registry. This acts as a quasi-filter of sorts.
However, it can be troublesome to use effectively and lacks decent
control.
For example, say you need to serialize only the following component over
the network:
```rust
#[derive(Reflect, Component, Default)]
#[reflect(Component)]
struct NPC {
name: Option<String>
}
```
To do this, you'd need to:
1. Create a new `AppTypeRegistry`
2. Register `NPC`
3. Register `Option<String>`
If we skip Step 3, then the entire scene might fail to serialize as
`Option<String>` requires registration.
Not only is this annoying and easy to forget, but it can leave users
with an impossible task: serializing a third-party type that contains
private types.
Generally, the third-party crate will register their private types
within a plugin so the user doesn't need to do it themselves. However,
this means we are now unable to serialize _just_ that type— we're forced
to allow everything!
## Solution
Add the `SceneFilter` enum for filtering components to extract.
This filter can be used to optionally allow or deny entire sets of
components/resources. With the `DynamicSceneBuilder`, users have more
control over how their `DynamicScene`s are built.
To only serialize a subset of components, use the `allow` method:
```rust
let scene = builder
.allow::<ComponentA>()
.allow::<ComponentB>()
.extract_entity(entity)
.build();
```
To serialize everything _but_ a subset of components, use the `deny`
method:
```rust
let scene = builder
.deny::<ComponentA>()
.deny::<ComponentB>()
.extract_entity(entity)
.build();
```
Or create a custom filter:
```rust
let components = HashSet::from([type_id]);
let filter = SceneFilter::Allowlist(components);
// let filter = SceneFilter::Denylist(components);
let scene = builder
.with_filter(Some(filter))
.extract_entity(entity)
.build();
```
Similar operations exist for resources:
<details>
<summary>View Resource Methods</summary>
To only serialize a subset of resources, use the `allow_resource`
method:
```rust
let scene = builder
.allow_resource::<ResourceA>()
.extract_resources()
.build();
```
To serialize everything _but_ a subset of resources, use the
`deny_resource` method:
```rust
let scene = builder
.deny_resource::<ResourceA>()
.extract_resources()
.build();
```
Or create a custom filter:
```rust
let resources = HashSet::from([type_id]);
let filter = SceneFilter::Allowlist(resources);
// let filter = SceneFilter::Denylist(resources);
let scene = builder
.with_resource_filter(Some(filter))
.extract_resources()
.build();
```
</details>
### Open Questions
- [x] ~~`allow` and `deny` are mutually exclusive. Currently, they
overwrite each other. Should this instead be a panic?~~ Took @soqb's
suggestion and made it so that the opposing method simply removes that
type from the list.
- [x] ~~`DynamicSceneBuilder` extracts entity data as soon as
`extract_entity`/`extract_entities` is called. Should this behavior
instead be moved to the `build` method to prevent ordering mixups (e.g.
`.allow::<Foo>().extract_entity(entity)` vs
`.extract_entity(entity).allow::<Foo>()`)? The tradeoff would be
iterating over the given entities twice: once at extraction and again at
build.~~ Based on the feedback from @Testare it sounds like it might be
better to just keep the current functionality (if anything we can open a
separate PR that adds deferred methods for extraction, so the
choice/performance hit is up to the user).
- [ ] An alternative might be to remove the filter from
`DynamicSceneBuilder` and have it as a separate parameter to the
extraction methods (either in the existing ones or as added
`extract_entity_with_filter`-type methods). Is this preferable?
- [x] ~~Should we include constructors that include common types to
allow/deny? For example, a `SceneFilter::standard_allowlist` that
includes things like `Parent` and `Children`?~~ Consensus suggests we
should. I may split this out into a followup PR, though.
- [x] ~~Should we add the ability to remove types from the filter
regardless of whether an allowlist or denylist (e.g.
`filter.remove::<Foo>()`)?~~ See the first list item
- [x] ~~Should `SceneFilter` be an enum? Would it make more sense as a
struct that contains an `is_denylist` boolean?~~ With the added
`SceneFilter::None` state (replacing the need to wrap in an `Option` or
rely on an empty `Denylist`), it seems an enum is better suited now
- [x] ~~Bikeshed: Do we like the naming convention? Should we instead
use `include`/`exclude` terminology?~~ Sounds like we're sticking with
`allow`/`deny`!
- [x] ~~Does this feature need a new example? Do we simply include it in
the existing one (maybe even as a comment?)? Should this be done in a
followup PR instead?~~ Example will be added in a followup PR
### Followup Tasks
- [ ] Add a dedicated `SceneFilter` example
- [ ] Possibly add default types to the filter (e.g. deny things like
`ComputedVisibility`, allow `Parent`, etc)
---
## Changelog
- Added the `SceneFilter` enum for filtering components and resources
when building a `DynamicScene`
- Added methods:
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::with_filter`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::allow`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::deny`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::allow_all`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::deny_all`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::with_resource_filter`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::allow_resource`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::deny_resource`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::allow_all_resources`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::deny_all_resources`
- Removed methods:
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::from_world_with_type_registry`
- `DynamicScene::from_scene` and `DynamicScene::from_world` no longer
require an `AppTypeRegistry` reference
## Migration Guide
- `DynamicScene::from_scene` and `DynamicScene::from_world` no longer
require an `AppTypeRegistry` reference:
```rust
// OLD
let registry = world.resource::<AppTypeRegistry>();
let dynamic_scene = DynamicScene::from_world(&world, registry);
// let dynamic_scene = DynamicScene::from_scene(&scene, registry);
// NEW
let dynamic_scene = DynamicScene::from_world(&world);
// let dynamic_scene = DynamicScene::from_scene(&scene);
```
- Removed `DynamicSceneBuilder::from_world_with_type_registry`. Now the
registry is automatically taken from the given world:
```rust
// OLD
let registry = world.resource::<AppTypeRegistry>();
let builder = DynamicSceneBuilder::from_world_with_type_registry(&world,
registry);
// NEW
let builder = DynamicSceneBuilder::from_world(&world);
```
2023-07-06 21:04:26 +00:00
|
|
|
self.resource_filter = SceneFilter::allow_all();
|
|
|
|
self
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/// Updates the filter to deny all resource types.
|
|
|
|
///
|
|
|
|
/// This is useful for resetting the filter so that types may be selectively [allowed].
|
|
|
|
///
|
|
|
|
/// [allowed]: Self::allow_resource
|
2023-10-09 19:46:17 +00:00
|
|
|
#[must_use]
|
|
|
|
pub fn deny_all_resources(mut self) -> Self {
|
bevy_scene: Add `SceneFilter` (#6793)
# Objective
Currently, `DynamicScene`s extract all components listed in the given
(or the world's) type registry. This acts as a quasi-filter of sorts.
However, it can be troublesome to use effectively and lacks decent
control.
For example, say you need to serialize only the following component over
the network:
```rust
#[derive(Reflect, Component, Default)]
#[reflect(Component)]
struct NPC {
name: Option<String>
}
```
To do this, you'd need to:
1. Create a new `AppTypeRegistry`
2. Register `NPC`
3. Register `Option<String>`
If we skip Step 3, then the entire scene might fail to serialize as
`Option<String>` requires registration.
Not only is this annoying and easy to forget, but it can leave users
with an impossible task: serializing a third-party type that contains
private types.
Generally, the third-party crate will register their private types
within a plugin so the user doesn't need to do it themselves. However,
this means we are now unable to serialize _just_ that type— we're forced
to allow everything!
## Solution
Add the `SceneFilter` enum for filtering components to extract.
This filter can be used to optionally allow or deny entire sets of
components/resources. With the `DynamicSceneBuilder`, users have more
control over how their `DynamicScene`s are built.
To only serialize a subset of components, use the `allow` method:
```rust
let scene = builder
.allow::<ComponentA>()
.allow::<ComponentB>()
.extract_entity(entity)
.build();
```
To serialize everything _but_ a subset of components, use the `deny`
method:
```rust
let scene = builder
.deny::<ComponentA>()
.deny::<ComponentB>()
.extract_entity(entity)
.build();
```
Or create a custom filter:
```rust
let components = HashSet::from([type_id]);
let filter = SceneFilter::Allowlist(components);
// let filter = SceneFilter::Denylist(components);
let scene = builder
.with_filter(Some(filter))
.extract_entity(entity)
.build();
```
Similar operations exist for resources:
<details>
<summary>View Resource Methods</summary>
To only serialize a subset of resources, use the `allow_resource`
method:
```rust
let scene = builder
.allow_resource::<ResourceA>()
.extract_resources()
.build();
```
To serialize everything _but_ a subset of resources, use the
`deny_resource` method:
```rust
let scene = builder
.deny_resource::<ResourceA>()
.extract_resources()
.build();
```
Or create a custom filter:
```rust
let resources = HashSet::from([type_id]);
let filter = SceneFilter::Allowlist(resources);
// let filter = SceneFilter::Denylist(resources);
let scene = builder
.with_resource_filter(Some(filter))
.extract_resources()
.build();
```
</details>
### Open Questions
- [x] ~~`allow` and `deny` are mutually exclusive. Currently, they
overwrite each other. Should this instead be a panic?~~ Took @soqb's
suggestion and made it so that the opposing method simply removes that
type from the list.
- [x] ~~`DynamicSceneBuilder` extracts entity data as soon as
`extract_entity`/`extract_entities` is called. Should this behavior
instead be moved to the `build` method to prevent ordering mixups (e.g.
`.allow::<Foo>().extract_entity(entity)` vs
`.extract_entity(entity).allow::<Foo>()`)? The tradeoff would be
iterating over the given entities twice: once at extraction and again at
build.~~ Based on the feedback from @Testare it sounds like it might be
better to just keep the current functionality (if anything we can open a
separate PR that adds deferred methods for extraction, so the
choice/performance hit is up to the user).
- [ ] An alternative might be to remove the filter from
`DynamicSceneBuilder` and have it as a separate parameter to the
extraction methods (either in the existing ones or as added
`extract_entity_with_filter`-type methods). Is this preferable?
- [x] ~~Should we include constructors that include common types to
allow/deny? For example, a `SceneFilter::standard_allowlist` that
includes things like `Parent` and `Children`?~~ Consensus suggests we
should. I may split this out into a followup PR, though.
- [x] ~~Should we add the ability to remove types from the filter
regardless of whether an allowlist or denylist (e.g.
`filter.remove::<Foo>()`)?~~ See the first list item
- [x] ~~Should `SceneFilter` be an enum? Would it make more sense as a
struct that contains an `is_denylist` boolean?~~ With the added
`SceneFilter::None` state (replacing the need to wrap in an `Option` or
rely on an empty `Denylist`), it seems an enum is better suited now
- [x] ~~Bikeshed: Do we like the naming convention? Should we instead
use `include`/`exclude` terminology?~~ Sounds like we're sticking with
`allow`/`deny`!
- [x] ~~Does this feature need a new example? Do we simply include it in
the existing one (maybe even as a comment?)? Should this be done in a
followup PR instead?~~ Example will be added in a followup PR
### Followup Tasks
- [ ] Add a dedicated `SceneFilter` example
- [ ] Possibly add default types to the filter (e.g. deny things like
`ComputedVisibility`, allow `Parent`, etc)
---
## Changelog
- Added the `SceneFilter` enum for filtering components and resources
when building a `DynamicScene`
- Added methods:
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::with_filter`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::allow`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::deny`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::allow_all`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::deny_all`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::with_resource_filter`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::allow_resource`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::deny_resource`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::allow_all_resources`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::deny_all_resources`
- Removed methods:
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::from_world_with_type_registry`
- `DynamicScene::from_scene` and `DynamicScene::from_world` no longer
require an `AppTypeRegistry` reference
## Migration Guide
- `DynamicScene::from_scene` and `DynamicScene::from_world` no longer
require an `AppTypeRegistry` reference:
```rust
// OLD
let registry = world.resource::<AppTypeRegistry>();
let dynamic_scene = DynamicScene::from_world(&world, registry);
// let dynamic_scene = DynamicScene::from_scene(&scene, registry);
// NEW
let dynamic_scene = DynamicScene::from_world(&world);
// let dynamic_scene = DynamicScene::from_scene(&scene);
```
- Removed `DynamicSceneBuilder::from_world_with_type_registry`. Now the
registry is automatically taken from the given world:
```rust
// OLD
let registry = world.resource::<AppTypeRegistry>();
let builder = DynamicSceneBuilder::from_world_with_type_registry(&world,
registry);
// NEW
let builder = DynamicSceneBuilder::from_world(&world);
```
2023-07-06 21:04:26 +00:00
|
|
|
self.resource_filter = SceneFilter::deny_all();
|
|
|
|
self
|
2022-10-12 01:48:16 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/// Consume the builder, producing a [`DynamicScene`].
|
2022-12-20 16:16:58 +00:00
|
|
|
///
|
|
|
|
/// To make sure the dynamic scene doesn't contain entities without any components, call
|
|
|
|
/// [`Self::remove_empty_entities`] before building the scene.
|
2023-10-09 19:46:17 +00:00
|
|
|
#[must_use]
|
2022-10-12 01:48:16 +00:00
|
|
|
pub fn build(self) -> DynamicScene {
|
|
|
|
DynamicScene {
|
(De) serialize resources in scenes (#6846)
# Objective
Co-Authored-By: davier
[bricedavier@gmail.com](mailto:bricedavier@gmail.com)
Fixes #3576.
Adds a `resources` field in scene serialization data to allow
de/serializing resources that have reflection enabled.
## Solution
Most of this code is taken from a previous closed PR:
https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/pull/3580. Most of the credit goes to
@Davier , what I did was mostly getting it to work on the latest main
branch of Bevy, along with adding a few asserts in the currently
existing tests to be sure everything is working properly.
This PR changes the scene format to include resources in this way:
```
(
resources: {
// List of resources here, keyed by resource type name.
},
entities: [
// Previous scene format here
],
)
```
An example taken from the tests:
```
(
resources: {
"bevy_scene::serde::tests::MyResource": (
foo: 123,
),
},
entities: {
// Previous scene format here
},
)
```
For this, a `resources` fields has been added on the `DynamicScene` and
the `DynamicSceneBuilder` structs. The latter now also has a method
named `extract_resources` to properly extract the existing resources
registered in the local type registry, in a similar way to
`extract_entities`.
---
## Changelog
Added: Reflect resources registered in the type registry used by dynamic
scenes will now be properly de/serialized in scene data.
## Migration Guide
Since the scene format has been changed, the user may not be able to use
scenes saved prior to this PR due to the `resources` scene field being
missing. ~~To preserve backwards compatibility, I will try to make the
`resources` fully optional so that old scenes can be loaded without
issue.~~
## TODOs
- [x] I may have to update a few doc blocks still referring to dynamic
scenes as mere container of entities, since they now include resources
as well.
- [x] ~~I want to make the `resources` key optional, as specified in the
Migration Guide, so that old scenes will be compatible with this
change.~~ Since this would only be trivial for ron format, I think it
might be better to consider it in a separate PR/discussion to figure out
if it could be done for binary serialization too.
- [x] I suppose it might be a good idea to add a resources in the scene
example so that users will quickly notice they can serialize resources
just like entities.
---------
Co-authored-by: Carter Anderson <mcanders1@gmail.com>
2023-03-20 21:17:02 +00:00
|
|
|
resources: self.extracted_resources.into_values().collect(),
|
2022-12-20 16:16:58 +00:00
|
|
|
entities: self.extracted_scene.into_values().collect(),
|
2022-10-12 01:48:16 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/// Extract one entity from the builder's [`World`].
|
|
|
|
///
|
|
|
|
/// Re-extracting an entity that was already extracted will have no effect.
|
2023-10-09 19:46:17 +00:00
|
|
|
#[must_use]
|
|
|
|
pub fn extract_entity(self, entity: Entity) -> Self {
|
2024-09-27 00:59:59 +00:00
|
|
|
self.extract_entities(core::iter::once(entity))
|
2022-10-12 01:48:16 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2023-01-06 00:43:30 +00:00
|
|
|
/// Despawns all entities with no components.
|
2022-12-20 16:16:58 +00:00
|
|
|
///
|
|
|
|
/// These were likely created because none of their components were present in the provided type registry upon extraction.
|
2023-10-09 19:46:17 +00:00
|
|
|
#[must_use]
|
|
|
|
pub fn remove_empty_entities(mut self) -> Self {
|
2022-12-20 16:16:58 +00:00
|
|
|
self.extracted_scene
|
|
|
|
.retain(|_, entity| !entity.components.is_empty());
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
self
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2022-10-12 01:48:16 +00:00
|
|
|
/// Extract entities from the builder's [`World`].
|
|
|
|
///
|
|
|
|
/// Re-extracting an entity that was already extracted will have no effect.
|
|
|
|
///
|
bevy_scene: Add `SceneFilter` (#6793)
# Objective
Currently, `DynamicScene`s extract all components listed in the given
(or the world's) type registry. This acts as a quasi-filter of sorts.
However, it can be troublesome to use effectively and lacks decent
control.
For example, say you need to serialize only the following component over
the network:
```rust
#[derive(Reflect, Component, Default)]
#[reflect(Component)]
struct NPC {
name: Option<String>
}
```
To do this, you'd need to:
1. Create a new `AppTypeRegistry`
2. Register `NPC`
3. Register `Option<String>`
If we skip Step 3, then the entire scene might fail to serialize as
`Option<String>` requires registration.
Not only is this annoying and easy to forget, but it can leave users
with an impossible task: serializing a third-party type that contains
private types.
Generally, the third-party crate will register their private types
within a plugin so the user doesn't need to do it themselves. However,
this means we are now unable to serialize _just_ that type— we're forced
to allow everything!
## Solution
Add the `SceneFilter` enum for filtering components to extract.
This filter can be used to optionally allow or deny entire sets of
components/resources. With the `DynamicSceneBuilder`, users have more
control over how their `DynamicScene`s are built.
To only serialize a subset of components, use the `allow` method:
```rust
let scene = builder
.allow::<ComponentA>()
.allow::<ComponentB>()
.extract_entity(entity)
.build();
```
To serialize everything _but_ a subset of components, use the `deny`
method:
```rust
let scene = builder
.deny::<ComponentA>()
.deny::<ComponentB>()
.extract_entity(entity)
.build();
```
Or create a custom filter:
```rust
let components = HashSet::from([type_id]);
let filter = SceneFilter::Allowlist(components);
// let filter = SceneFilter::Denylist(components);
let scene = builder
.with_filter(Some(filter))
.extract_entity(entity)
.build();
```
Similar operations exist for resources:
<details>
<summary>View Resource Methods</summary>
To only serialize a subset of resources, use the `allow_resource`
method:
```rust
let scene = builder
.allow_resource::<ResourceA>()
.extract_resources()
.build();
```
To serialize everything _but_ a subset of resources, use the
`deny_resource` method:
```rust
let scene = builder
.deny_resource::<ResourceA>()
.extract_resources()
.build();
```
Or create a custom filter:
```rust
let resources = HashSet::from([type_id]);
let filter = SceneFilter::Allowlist(resources);
// let filter = SceneFilter::Denylist(resources);
let scene = builder
.with_resource_filter(Some(filter))
.extract_resources()
.build();
```
</details>
### Open Questions
- [x] ~~`allow` and `deny` are mutually exclusive. Currently, they
overwrite each other. Should this instead be a panic?~~ Took @soqb's
suggestion and made it so that the opposing method simply removes that
type from the list.
- [x] ~~`DynamicSceneBuilder` extracts entity data as soon as
`extract_entity`/`extract_entities` is called. Should this behavior
instead be moved to the `build` method to prevent ordering mixups (e.g.
`.allow::<Foo>().extract_entity(entity)` vs
`.extract_entity(entity).allow::<Foo>()`)? The tradeoff would be
iterating over the given entities twice: once at extraction and again at
build.~~ Based on the feedback from @Testare it sounds like it might be
better to just keep the current functionality (if anything we can open a
separate PR that adds deferred methods for extraction, so the
choice/performance hit is up to the user).
- [ ] An alternative might be to remove the filter from
`DynamicSceneBuilder` and have it as a separate parameter to the
extraction methods (either in the existing ones or as added
`extract_entity_with_filter`-type methods). Is this preferable?
- [x] ~~Should we include constructors that include common types to
allow/deny? For example, a `SceneFilter::standard_allowlist` that
includes things like `Parent` and `Children`?~~ Consensus suggests we
should. I may split this out into a followup PR, though.
- [x] ~~Should we add the ability to remove types from the filter
regardless of whether an allowlist or denylist (e.g.
`filter.remove::<Foo>()`)?~~ See the first list item
- [x] ~~Should `SceneFilter` be an enum? Would it make more sense as a
struct that contains an `is_denylist` boolean?~~ With the added
`SceneFilter::None` state (replacing the need to wrap in an `Option` or
rely on an empty `Denylist`), it seems an enum is better suited now
- [x] ~~Bikeshed: Do we like the naming convention? Should we instead
use `include`/`exclude` terminology?~~ Sounds like we're sticking with
`allow`/`deny`!
- [x] ~~Does this feature need a new example? Do we simply include it in
the existing one (maybe even as a comment?)? Should this be done in a
followup PR instead?~~ Example will be added in a followup PR
### Followup Tasks
- [ ] Add a dedicated `SceneFilter` example
- [ ] Possibly add default types to the filter (e.g. deny things like
`ComputedVisibility`, allow `Parent`, etc)
---
## Changelog
- Added the `SceneFilter` enum for filtering components and resources
when building a `DynamicScene`
- Added methods:
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::with_filter`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::allow`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::deny`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::allow_all`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::deny_all`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::with_resource_filter`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::allow_resource`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::deny_resource`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::allow_all_resources`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::deny_all_resources`
- Removed methods:
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::from_world_with_type_registry`
- `DynamicScene::from_scene` and `DynamicScene::from_world` no longer
require an `AppTypeRegistry` reference
## Migration Guide
- `DynamicScene::from_scene` and `DynamicScene::from_world` no longer
require an `AppTypeRegistry` reference:
```rust
// OLD
let registry = world.resource::<AppTypeRegistry>();
let dynamic_scene = DynamicScene::from_world(&world, registry);
// let dynamic_scene = DynamicScene::from_scene(&scene, registry);
// NEW
let dynamic_scene = DynamicScene::from_world(&world);
// let dynamic_scene = DynamicScene::from_scene(&scene);
```
- Removed `DynamicSceneBuilder::from_world_with_type_registry`. Now the
registry is automatically taken from the given world:
```rust
// OLD
let registry = world.resource::<AppTypeRegistry>();
let builder = DynamicSceneBuilder::from_world_with_type_registry(&world,
registry);
// NEW
let builder = DynamicSceneBuilder::from_world(&world);
```
2023-07-06 21:04:26 +00:00
|
|
|
/// To control which components are extracted, use the [`allow`] or
|
|
|
|
/// [`deny`] helper methods.
|
|
|
|
///
|
|
|
|
/// This method may be used to extract entities from a query:
|
2022-10-12 01:48:16 +00:00
|
|
|
/// ```
|
|
|
|
/// # use bevy_scene::DynamicSceneBuilder;
|
2023-06-21 17:25:01 +00:00
|
|
|
/// # use bevy_ecs::reflect::AppTypeRegistry;
|
2022-10-12 01:48:16 +00:00
|
|
|
/// # use bevy_ecs::{
|
|
|
|
/// # component::Component, prelude::Entity, query::With, reflect::ReflectComponent, world::World,
|
|
|
|
/// # };
|
|
|
|
/// # use bevy_reflect::Reflect;
|
|
|
|
/// #[derive(Component, Default, Reflect)]
|
|
|
|
/// #[reflect(Component)]
|
|
|
|
/// struct MyComponent;
|
|
|
|
///
|
|
|
|
/// # let mut world = World::default();
|
|
|
|
/// # world.init_resource::<AppTypeRegistry>();
|
|
|
|
/// # let _entity = world.spawn(MyComponent).id();
|
|
|
|
/// let mut query = world.query_filtered::<Entity, With<MyComponent>>();
|
|
|
|
///
|
2023-10-09 19:46:17 +00:00
|
|
|
/// let scene = DynamicSceneBuilder::from_world(&world)
|
|
|
|
/// .extract_entities(query.iter(&world))
|
|
|
|
/// .build();
|
2022-10-12 01:48:16 +00:00
|
|
|
/// ```
|
bevy_scene: Add `SceneFilter` (#6793)
# Objective
Currently, `DynamicScene`s extract all components listed in the given
(or the world's) type registry. This acts as a quasi-filter of sorts.
However, it can be troublesome to use effectively and lacks decent
control.
For example, say you need to serialize only the following component over
the network:
```rust
#[derive(Reflect, Component, Default)]
#[reflect(Component)]
struct NPC {
name: Option<String>
}
```
To do this, you'd need to:
1. Create a new `AppTypeRegistry`
2. Register `NPC`
3. Register `Option<String>`
If we skip Step 3, then the entire scene might fail to serialize as
`Option<String>` requires registration.
Not only is this annoying and easy to forget, but it can leave users
with an impossible task: serializing a third-party type that contains
private types.
Generally, the third-party crate will register their private types
within a plugin so the user doesn't need to do it themselves. However,
this means we are now unable to serialize _just_ that type— we're forced
to allow everything!
## Solution
Add the `SceneFilter` enum for filtering components to extract.
This filter can be used to optionally allow or deny entire sets of
components/resources. With the `DynamicSceneBuilder`, users have more
control over how their `DynamicScene`s are built.
To only serialize a subset of components, use the `allow` method:
```rust
let scene = builder
.allow::<ComponentA>()
.allow::<ComponentB>()
.extract_entity(entity)
.build();
```
To serialize everything _but_ a subset of components, use the `deny`
method:
```rust
let scene = builder
.deny::<ComponentA>()
.deny::<ComponentB>()
.extract_entity(entity)
.build();
```
Or create a custom filter:
```rust
let components = HashSet::from([type_id]);
let filter = SceneFilter::Allowlist(components);
// let filter = SceneFilter::Denylist(components);
let scene = builder
.with_filter(Some(filter))
.extract_entity(entity)
.build();
```
Similar operations exist for resources:
<details>
<summary>View Resource Methods</summary>
To only serialize a subset of resources, use the `allow_resource`
method:
```rust
let scene = builder
.allow_resource::<ResourceA>()
.extract_resources()
.build();
```
To serialize everything _but_ a subset of resources, use the
`deny_resource` method:
```rust
let scene = builder
.deny_resource::<ResourceA>()
.extract_resources()
.build();
```
Or create a custom filter:
```rust
let resources = HashSet::from([type_id]);
let filter = SceneFilter::Allowlist(resources);
// let filter = SceneFilter::Denylist(resources);
let scene = builder
.with_resource_filter(Some(filter))
.extract_resources()
.build();
```
</details>
### Open Questions
- [x] ~~`allow` and `deny` are mutually exclusive. Currently, they
overwrite each other. Should this instead be a panic?~~ Took @soqb's
suggestion and made it so that the opposing method simply removes that
type from the list.
- [x] ~~`DynamicSceneBuilder` extracts entity data as soon as
`extract_entity`/`extract_entities` is called. Should this behavior
instead be moved to the `build` method to prevent ordering mixups (e.g.
`.allow::<Foo>().extract_entity(entity)` vs
`.extract_entity(entity).allow::<Foo>()`)? The tradeoff would be
iterating over the given entities twice: once at extraction and again at
build.~~ Based on the feedback from @Testare it sounds like it might be
better to just keep the current functionality (if anything we can open a
separate PR that adds deferred methods for extraction, so the
choice/performance hit is up to the user).
- [ ] An alternative might be to remove the filter from
`DynamicSceneBuilder` and have it as a separate parameter to the
extraction methods (either in the existing ones or as added
`extract_entity_with_filter`-type methods). Is this preferable?
- [x] ~~Should we include constructors that include common types to
allow/deny? For example, a `SceneFilter::standard_allowlist` that
includes things like `Parent` and `Children`?~~ Consensus suggests we
should. I may split this out into a followup PR, though.
- [x] ~~Should we add the ability to remove types from the filter
regardless of whether an allowlist or denylist (e.g.
`filter.remove::<Foo>()`)?~~ See the first list item
- [x] ~~Should `SceneFilter` be an enum? Would it make more sense as a
struct that contains an `is_denylist` boolean?~~ With the added
`SceneFilter::None` state (replacing the need to wrap in an `Option` or
rely on an empty `Denylist`), it seems an enum is better suited now
- [x] ~~Bikeshed: Do we like the naming convention? Should we instead
use `include`/`exclude` terminology?~~ Sounds like we're sticking with
`allow`/`deny`!
- [x] ~~Does this feature need a new example? Do we simply include it in
the existing one (maybe even as a comment?)? Should this be done in a
followup PR instead?~~ Example will be added in a followup PR
### Followup Tasks
- [ ] Add a dedicated `SceneFilter` example
- [ ] Possibly add default types to the filter (e.g. deny things like
`ComputedVisibility`, allow `Parent`, etc)
---
## Changelog
- Added the `SceneFilter` enum for filtering components and resources
when building a `DynamicScene`
- Added methods:
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::with_filter`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::allow`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::deny`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::allow_all`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::deny_all`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::with_resource_filter`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::allow_resource`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::deny_resource`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::allow_all_resources`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::deny_all_resources`
- Removed methods:
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::from_world_with_type_registry`
- `DynamicScene::from_scene` and `DynamicScene::from_world` no longer
require an `AppTypeRegistry` reference
## Migration Guide
- `DynamicScene::from_scene` and `DynamicScene::from_world` no longer
require an `AppTypeRegistry` reference:
```rust
// OLD
let registry = world.resource::<AppTypeRegistry>();
let dynamic_scene = DynamicScene::from_world(&world, registry);
// let dynamic_scene = DynamicScene::from_scene(&scene, registry);
// NEW
let dynamic_scene = DynamicScene::from_world(&world);
// let dynamic_scene = DynamicScene::from_scene(&scene);
```
- Removed `DynamicSceneBuilder::from_world_with_type_registry`. Now the
registry is automatically taken from the given world:
```rust
// OLD
let registry = world.resource::<AppTypeRegistry>();
let builder = DynamicSceneBuilder::from_world_with_type_registry(&world,
registry);
// NEW
let builder = DynamicSceneBuilder::from_world(&world);
```
2023-07-06 21:04:26 +00:00
|
|
|
///
|
|
|
|
/// Note that components extracted from queried entities must still pass through the filter if one is set.
|
|
|
|
///
|
2024-09-15 14:37:32 +00:00
|
|
|
/// [`allow`]: Self::allow_component
|
|
|
|
/// [`deny`]: Self::deny_component
|
2023-10-09 19:46:17 +00:00
|
|
|
#[must_use]
|
|
|
|
pub fn extract_entities(mut self, entities: impl Iterator<Item = Entity>) -> Self {
|
bevy_scene: Add `SceneFilter` (#6793)
# Objective
Currently, `DynamicScene`s extract all components listed in the given
(or the world's) type registry. This acts as a quasi-filter of sorts.
However, it can be troublesome to use effectively and lacks decent
control.
For example, say you need to serialize only the following component over
the network:
```rust
#[derive(Reflect, Component, Default)]
#[reflect(Component)]
struct NPC {
name: Option<String>
}
```
To do this, you'd need to:
1. Create a new `AppTypeRegistry`
2. Register `NPC`
3. Register `Option<String>`
If we skip Step 3, then the entire scene might fail to serialize as
`Option<String>` requires registration.
Not only is this annoying and easy to forget, but it can leave users
with an impossible task: serializing a third-party type that contains
private types.
Generally, the third-party crate will register their private types
within a plugin so the user doesn't need to do it themselves. However,
this means we are now unable to serialize _just_ that type— we're forced
to allow everything!
## Solution
Add the `SceneFilter` enum for filtering components to extract.
This filter can be used to optionally allow or deny entire sets of
components/resources. With the `DynamicSceneBuilder`, users have more
control over how their `DynamicScene`s are built.
To only serialize a subset of components, use the `allow` method:
```rust
let scene = builder
.allow::<ComponentA>()
.allow::<ComponentB>()
.extract_entity(entity)
.build();
```
To serialize everything _but_ a subset of components, use the `deny`
method:
```rust
let scene = builder
.deny::<ComponentA>()
.deny::<ComponentB>()
.extract_entity(entity)
.build();
```
Or create a custom filter:
```rust
let components = HashSet::from([type_id]);
let filter = SceneFilter::Allowlist(components);
// let filter = SceneFilter::Denylist(components);
let scene = builder
.with_filter(Some(filter))
.extract_entity(entity)
.build();
```
Similar operations exist for resources:
<details>
<summary>View Resource Methods</summary>
To only serialize a subset of resources, use the `allow_resource`
method:
```rust
let scene = builder
.allow_resource::<ResourceA>()
.extract_resources()
.build();
```
To serialize everything _but_ a subset of resources, use the
`deny_resource` method:
```rust
let scene = builder
.deny_resource::<ResourceA>()
.extract_resources()
.build();
```
Or create a custom filter:
```rust
let resources = HashSet::from([type_id]);
let filter = SceneFilter::Allowlist(resources);
// let filter = SceneFilter::Denylist(resources);
let scene = builder
.with_resource_filter(Some(filter))
.extract_resources()
.build();
```
</details>
### Open Questions
- [x] ~~`allow` and `deny` are mutually exclusive. Currently, they
overwrite each other. Should this instead be a panic?~~ Took @soqb's
suggestion and made it so that the opposing method simply removes that
type from the list.
- [x] ~~`DynamicSceneBuilder` extracts entity data as soon as
`extract_entity`/`extract_entities` is called. Should this behavior
instead be moved to the `build` method to prevent ordering mixups (e.g.
`.allow::<Foo>().extract_entity(entity)` vs
`.extract_entity(entity).allow::<Foo>()`)? The tradeoff would be
iterating over the given entities twice: once at extraction and again at
build.~~ Based on the feedback from @Testare it sounds like it might be
better to just keep the current functionality (if anything we can open a
separate PR that adds deferred methods for extraction, so the
choice/performance hit is up to the user).
- [ ] An alternative might be to remove the filter from
`DynamicSceneBuilder` and have it as a separate parameter to the
extraction methods (either in the existing ones or as added
`extract_entity_with_filter`-type methods). Is this preferable?
- [x] ~~Should we include constructors that include common types to
allow/deny? For example, a `SceneFilter::standard_allowlist` that
includes things like `Parent` and `Children`?~~ Consensus suggests we
should. I may split this out into a followup PR, though.
- [x] ~~Should we add the ability to remove types from the filter
regardless of whether an allowlist or denylist (e.g.
`filter.remove::<Foo>()`)?~~ See the first list item
- [x] ~~Should `SceneFilter` be an enum? Would it make more sense as a
struct that contains an `is_denylist` boolean?~~ With the added
`SceneFilter::None` state (replacing the need to wrap in an `Option` or
rely on an empty `Denylist`), it seems an enum is better suited now
- [x] ~~Bikeshed: Do we like the naming convention? Should we instead
use `include`/`exclude` terminology?~~ Sounds like we're sticking with
`allow`/`deny`!
- [x] ~~Does this feature need a new example? Do we simply include it in
the existing one (maybe even as a comment?)? Should this be done in a
followup PR instead?~~ Example will be added in a followup PR
### Followup Tasks
- [ ] Add a dedicated `SceneFilter` example
- [ ] Possibly add default types to the filter (e.g. deny things like
`ComputedVisibility`, allow `Parent`, etc)
---
## Changelog
- Added the `SceneFilter` enum for filtering components and resources
when building a `DynamicScene`
- Added methods:
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::with_filter`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::allow`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::deny`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::allow_all`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::deny_all`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::with_resource_filter`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::allow_resource`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::deny_resource`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::allow_all_resources`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::deny_all_resources`
- Removed methods:
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::from_world_with_type_registry`
- `DynamicScene::from_scene` and `DynamicScene::from_world` no longer
require an `AppTypeRegistry` reference
## Migration Guide
- `DynamicScene::from_scene` and `DynamicScene::from_world` no longer
require an `AppTypeRegistry` reference:
```rust
// OLD
let registry = world.resource::<AppTypeRegistry>();
let dynamic_scene = DynamicScene::from_world(&world, registry);
// let dynamic_scene = DynamicScene::from_scene(&scene, registry);
// NEW
let dynamic_scene = DynamicScene::from_world(&world);
// let dynamic_scene = DynamicScene::from_scene(&scene);
```
- Removed `DynamicSceneBuilder::from_world_with_type_registry`. Now the
registry is automatically taken from the given world:
```rust
// OLD
let registry = world.resource::<AppTypeRegistry>();
let builder = DynamicSceneBuilder::from_world_with_type_registry(&world,
registry);
// NEW
let builder = DynamicSceneBuilder::from_world(&world);
```
2023-07-06 21:04:26 +00:00
|
|
|
let type_registry = self.original_world.resource::<AppTypeRegistry>().read();
|
2022-10-12 01:48:16 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for entity in entities {
|
Make scene handling of entity references robust (#7335)
# Objective
- Handle dangling entity references inside scenes
- Handle references to entities with generation > 0 inside scenes
- Fix a latent bug in `Parent`'s `MapEntities` implementation, which
would, if the parent was outside the scene, cause the scene to be loaded
into the new world with a parent reference potentially pointing to some
random entity in that new world.
- Fixes #4793 and addresses #7235
## Solution
- DynamicScenes now identify entities with a `Entity` instead of a u32,
therefore including generation
- `World` exposes a new `reserve_generations` function that despawns an
entity and advances its generation by some extra amount.
- `MapEntities` implementations have a new `get_or_reserve` function
available that will always return an `Entity`, establishing a new
mapping to a dead entity when the entity they are called with is not in
the `EntityMap`. Subsequent calls with that same `Entity` will return
the same newly created dead entity reference, preserving equality
semantics.
- As a result, after loading a scene containing references to dead
entities (or entities otherwise outside the scene), those references
will all point to different generations on a single entity id in the new
world.
---
## Changelog
### Changed
- In serialized scenes, entities are now identified by a u64 instead of
a u32.
- In serialized scenes, components with entity references now have those
references serialize as u64s instead of structs.
### Fixed
- Scenes containing components with entity references will now
deserialize and add to a world reliably.
## Migration Guide
- `MapEntities` implementations must change from a `&EntityMap`
parameter to a `&mut EntityMapper` parameter and can no longer return a
`Result`. Finally, they should switch from calling `EntityMap::get` to
calling `EntityMapper::get_or_reserve`.
---------
Co-authored-by: Nicola Papale <nicopap@users.noreply.github.com>
2023-05-01 15:49:27 +00:00
|
|
|
if self.extracted_scene.contains_key(&entity) {
|
2022-10-12 01:48:16 +00:00
|
|
|
continue;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
let mut entry = DynamicEntity {
|
Make scene handling of entity references robust (#7335)
# Objective
- Handle dangling entity references inside scenes
- Handle references to entities with generation > 0 inside scenes
- Fix a latent bug in `Parent`'s `MapEntities` implementation, which
would, if the parent was outside the scene, cause the scene to be loaded
into the new world with a parent reference potentially pointing to some
random entity in that new world.
- Fixes #4793 and addresses #7235
## Solution
- DynamicScenes now identify entities with a `Entity` instead of a u32,
therefore including generation
- `World` exposes a new `reserve_generations` function that despawns an
entity and advances its generation by some extra amount.
- `MapEntities` implementations have a new `get_or_reserve` function
available that will always return an `Entity`, establishing a new
mapping to a dead entity when the entity they are called with is not in
the `EntityMap`. Subsequent calls with that same `Entity` will return
the same newly created dead entity reference, preserving equality
semantics.
- As a result, after loading a scene containing references to dead
entities (or entities otherwise outside the scene), those references
will all point to different generations on a single entity id in the new
world.
---
## Changelog
### Changed
- In serialized scenes, entities are now identified by a u64 instead of
a u32.
- In serialized scenes, components with entity references now have those
references serialize as u64s instead of structs.
### Fixed
- Scenes containing components with entity references will now
deserialize and add to a world reliably.
## Migration Guide
- `MapEntities` implementations must change from a `&EntityMap`
parameter to a `&mut EntityMapper` parameter and can no longer return a
`Result`. Finally, they should switch from calling `EntityMap::get` to
calling `EntityMapper::get_or_reserve`.
---------
Co-authored-by: Nicola Papale <nicopap@users.noreply.github.com>
2023-05-01 15:49:27 +00:00
|
|
|
entity,
|
2022-10-12 01:48:16 +00:00
|
|
|
components: Vec::new(),
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
Make scene handling of entity references robust (#7335)
# Objective
- Handle dangling entity references inside scenes
- Handle references to entities with generation > 0 inside scenes
- Fix a latent bug in `Parent`'s `MapEntities` implementation, which
would, if the parent was outside the scene, cause the scene to be loaded
into the new world with a parent reference potentially pointing to some
random entity in that new world.
- Fixes #4793 and addresses #7235
## Solution
- DynamicScenes now identify entities with a `Entity` instead of a u32,
therefore including generation
- `World` exposes a new `reserve_generations` function that despawns an
entity and advances its generation by some extra amount.
- `MapEntities` implementations have a new `get_or_reserve` function
available that will always return an `Entity`, establishing a new
mapping to a dead entity when the entity they are called with is not in
the `EntityMap`. Subsequent calls with that same `Entity` will return
the same newly created dead entity reference, preserving equality
semantics.
- As a result, after loading a scene containing references to dead
entities (or entities otherwise outside the scene), those references
will all point to different generations on a single entity id in the new
world.
---
## Changelog
### Changed
- In serialized scenes, entities are now identified by a u64 instead of
a u32.
- In serialized scenes, components with entity references now have those
references serialize as u64s instead of structs.
### Fixed
- Scenes containing components with entity references will now
deserialize and add to a world reliably.
## Migration Guide
- `MapEntities` implementations must change from a `&EntityMap`
parameter to a `&mut EntityMapper` parameter and can no longer return a
`Result`. Finally, they should switch from calling `EntityMap::get` to
calling `EntityMapper::get_or_reserve`.
---------
Co-authored-by: Nicola Papale <nicopap@users.noreply.github.com>
2023-05-01 15:49:27 +00:00
|
|
|
let original_entity = self.original_world.entity(entity);
|
|
|
|
for component_id in original_entity.archetype().components() {
|
(De) serialize resources in scenes (#6846)
# Objective
Co-Authored-By: davier
[bricedavier@gmail.com](mailto:bricedavier@gmail.com)
Fixes #3576.
Adds a `resources` field in scene serialization data to allow
de/serializing resources that have reflection enabled.
## Solution
Most of this code is taken from a previous closed PR:
https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/pull/3580. Most of the credit goes to
@Davier , what I did was mostly getting it to work on the latest main
branch of Bevy, along with adding a few asserts in the currently
existing tests to be sure everything is working properly.
This PR changes the scene format to include resources in this way:
```
(
resources: {
// List of resources here, keyed by resource type name.
},
entities: [
// Previous scene format here
],
)
```
An example taken from the tests:
```
(
resources: {
"bevy_scene::serde::tests::MyResource": (
foo: 123,
),
},
entities: {
// Previous scene format here
},
)
```
For this, a `resources` fields has been added on the `DynamicScene` and
the `DynamicSceneBuilder` structs. The latter now also has a method
named `extract_resources` to properly extract the existing resources
registered in the local type registry, in a similar way to
`extract_entities`.
---
## Changelog
Added: Reflect resources registered in the type registry used by dynamic
scenes will now be properly de/serialized in scene data.
## Migration Guide
Since the scene format has been changed, the user may not be able to use
scenes saved prior to this PR due to the `resources` scene field being
missing. ~~To preserve backwards compatibility, I will try to make the
`resources` fully optional so that old scenes can be loaded without
issue.~~
## TODOs
- [x] I may have to update a few doc blocks still referring to dynamic
scenes as mere container of entities, since they now include resources
as well.
- [x] ~~I want to make the `resources` key optional, as specified in the
Migration Guide, so that old scenes will be compatible with this
change.~~ Since this would only be trivial for ron format, I think it
might be better to consider it in a separate PR/discussion to figure out
if it could be done for binary serialization too.
- [x] I suppose it might be a good idea to add a resources in the scene
example so that users will quickly notice they can serialize resources
just like entities.
---------
Co-authored-by: Carter Anderson <mcanders1@gmail.com>
2023-03-20 21:17:02 +00:00
|
|
|
let mut extract_and_push = || {
|
|
|
|
let type_id = self
|
|
|
|
.original_world
|
|
|
|
.components()
|
|
|
|
.get_info(component_id)?
|
|
|
|
.type_id()?;
|
bevy_scene: Add `SceneFilter` (#6793)
# Objective
Currently, `DynamicScene`s extract all components listed in the given
(or the world's) type registry. This acts as a quasi-filter of sorts.
However, it can be troublesome to use effectively and lacks decent
control.
For example, say you need to serialize only the following component over
the network:
```rust
#[derive(Reflect, Component, Default)]
#[reflect(Component)]
struct NPC {
name: Option<String>
}
```
To do this, you'd need to:
1. Create a new `AppTypeRegistry`
2. Register `NPC`
3. Register `Option<String>`
If we skip Step 3, then the entire scene might fail to serialize as
`Option<String>` requires registration.
Not only is this annoying and easy to forget, but it can leave users
with an impossible task: serializing a third-party type that contains
private types.
Generally, the third-party crate will register their private types
within a plugin so the user doesn't need to do it themselves. However,
this means we are now unable to serialize _just_ that type— we're forced
to allow everything!
## Solution
Add the `SceneFilter` enum for filtering components to extract.
This filter can be used to optionally allow or deny entire sets of
components/resources. With the `DynamicSceneBuilder`, users have more
control over how their `DynamicScene`s are built.
To only serialize a subset of components, use the `allow` method:
```rust
let scene = builder
.allow::<ComponentA>()
.allow::<ComponentB>()
.extract_entity(entity)
.build();
```
To serialize everything _but_ a subset of components, use the `deny`
method:
```rust
let scene = builder
.deny::<ComponentA>()
.deny::<ComponentB>()
.extract_entity(entity)
.build();
```
Or create a custom filter:
```rust
let components = HashSet::from([type_id]);
let filter = SceneFilter::Allowlist(components);
// let filter = SceneFilter::Denylist(components);
let scene = builder
.with_filter(Some(filter))
.extract_entity(entity)
.build();
```
Similar operations exist for resources:
<details>
<summary>View Resource Methods</summary>
To only serialize a subset of resources, use the `allow_resource`
method:
```rust
let scene = builder
.allow_resource::<ResourceA>()
.extract_resources()
.build();
```
To serialize everything _but_ a subset of resources, use the
`deny_resource` method:
```rust
let scene = builder
.deny_resource::<ResourceA>()
.extract_resources()
.build();
```
Or create a custom filter:
```rust
let resources = HashSet::from([type_id]);
let filter = SceneFilter::Allowlist(resources);
// let filter = SceneFilter::Denylist(resources);
let scene = builder
.with_resource_filter(Some(filter))
.extract_resources()
.build();
```
</details>
### Open Questions
- [x] ~~`allow` and `deny` are mutually exclusive. Currently, they
overwrite each other. Should this instead be a panic?~~ Took @soqb's
suggestion and made it so that the opposing method simply removes that
type from the list.
- [x] ~~`DynamicSceneBuilder` extracts entity data as soon as
`extract_entity`/`extract_entities` is called. Should this behavior
instead be moved to the `build` method to prevent ordering mixups (e.g.
`.allow::<Foo>().extract_entity(entity)` vs
`.extract_entity(entity).allow::<Foo>()`)? The tradeoff would be
iterating over the given entities twice: once at extraction and again at
build.~~ Based on the feedback from @Testare it sounds like it might be
better to just keep the current functionality (if anything we can open a
separate PR that adds deferred methods for extraction, so the
choice/performance hit is up to the user).
- [ ] An alternative might be to remove the filter from
`DynamicSceneBuilder` and have it as a separate parameter to the
extraction methods (either in the existing ones or as added
`extract_entity_with_filter`-type methods). Is this preferable?
- [x] ~~Should we include constructors that include common types to
allow/deny? For example, a `SceneFilter::standard_allowlist` that
includes things like `Parent` and `Children`?~~ Consensus suggests we
should. I may split this out into a followup PR, though.
- [x] ~~Should we add the ability to remove types from the filter
regardless of whether an allowlist or denylist (e.g.
`filter.remove::<Foo>()`)?~~ See the first list item
- [x] ~~Should `SceneFilter` be an enum? Would it make more sense as a
struct that contains an `is_denylist` boolean?~~ With the added
`SceneFilter::None` state (replacing the need to wrap in an `Option` or
rely on an empty `Denylist`), it seems an enum is better suited now
- [x] ~~Bikeshed: Do we like the naming convention? Should we instead
use `include`/`exclude` terminology?~~ Sounds like we're sticking with
`allow`/`deny`!
- [x] ~~Does this feature need a new example? Do we simply include it in
the existing one (maybe even as a comment?)? Should this be done in a
followup PR instead?~~ Example will be added in a followup PR
### Followup Tasks
- [ ] Add a dedicated `SceneFilter` example
- [ ] Possibly add default types to the filter (e.g. deny things like
`ComputedVisibility`, allow `Parent`, etc)
---
## Changelog
- Added the `SceneFilter` enum for filtering components and resources
when building a `DynamicScene`
- Added methods:
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::with_filter`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::allow`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::deny`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::allow_all`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::deny_all`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::with_resource_filter`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::allow_resource`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::deny_resource`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::allow_all_resources`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::deny_all_resources`
- Removed methods:
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::from_world_with_type_registry`
- `DynamicScene::from_scene` and `DynamicScene::from_world` no longer
require an `AppTypeRegistry` reference
## Migration Guide
- `DynamicScene::from_scene` and `DynamicScene::from_world` no longer
require an `AppTypeRegistry` reference:
```rust
// OLD
let registry = world.resource::<AppTypeRegistry>();
let dynamic_scene = DynamicScene::from_world(&world, registry);
// let dynamic_scene = DynamicScene::from_scene(&scene, registry);
// NEW
let dynamic_scene = DynamicScene::from_world(&world);
// let dynamic_scene = DynamicScene::from_scene(&scene);
```
- Removed `DynamicSceneBuilder::from_world_with_type_registry`. Now the
registry is automatically taken from the given world:
```rust
// OLD
let registry = world.resource::<AppTypeRegistry>();
let builder = DynamicSceneBuilder::from_world_with_type_registry(&world,
registry);
// NEW
let builder = DynamicSceneBuilder::from_world(&world);
```
2023-07-06 21:04:26 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
let is_denied = self.component_filter.is_denied_by_id(type_id);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if is_denied {
|
|
|
|
// Component is either in the denylist or _not_ in the allowlist
|
|
|
|
return None;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
Use `FromReflect` when extracting entities in dynamic scenes (#15174)
# Objective
Fix #10284.
## Solution
When `DynamicSceneBuilder` extracts entities, they are cloned via
`PartialReflect::clone_value`, making them into dynamic versions of the
original components. This loses any custom `ReflectSerialize` type data.
Dynamic scenes are deserialized with the original types, not the dynamic
versions, and so any component with a custom serialize may fail. In this
case `Rect` and `Vec2`. The dynamic version includes the field names 'x'
and 'y' but the `Serialize` impl doesn't, hence the "expect float"
error.
The solution here: Instead of using `clone_value` to clone the
components, `FromReflect` clones and retains the original information
needed to serialize with any custom `Serialize` impls. I think using
something like `reflect_clone` from
(https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/pull/13432) might make this more
efficient.
I also did the same when deserializing dynamic scenes to appease some of
the round-trip tests which use `ReflectPartialEq`, which requires the
types be the same and not a unique/proxy pair. I'm not sure it's
otherwise necessary. Maybe this would also be more efficient when
spawning dynamic scenes with `reflect_clone` instead of `FromReflect`
again?
An alternative solution would be to fall back to the dynamic version
when deserializing `DynamicScene`s if the custom version fails. I think
that's possible. Or maybe simply always deserializing via the dynamic
route for dynamic scenes?
## Testing
This example is similar to the original test case in #10284:
``` rust
#![allow(missing_docs)]
use bevy::{prelude::*, scene::SceneInstanceReady};
fn main() {
App::new()
.add_plugins(DefaultPlugins)
.add_systems(Startup, (save, load).chain())
.observe(check)
.run();
}
static SAVEGAME_SAVE_PATH: &str = "savegame.scn.ron";
fn save(world: &mut World) {
let entity = world.spawn(OrthographicProjection::default()).id();
let scene = DynamicSceneBuilder::from_world(world)
.extract_entity(entity)
.build();
if let Some(registry) = world.get_resource::<AppTypeRegistry>() {
let registry = registry.read();
let serialized_scene = scene.serialize(®istry).unwrap();
// println!("{}", serialized_scene);
std::fs::write(format!("assets/{SAVEGAME_SAVE_PATH}"), serialized_scene).unwrap();
}
world.entity_mut(entity).despawn_recursive();
}
fn load(mut commands: Commands, asset_server: Res<AssetServer>) {
commands.spawn(DynamicSceneBundle {
scene: asset_server.load(SAVEGAME_SAVE_PATH),
..default()
});
}
fn check(_trigger: Trigger<SceneInstanceReady>, query: Query<&OrthographicProjection>) {
dbg!(query.single());
}
```
## Migration Guide
The `DynamicScene` format is changed to use custom serialize impls so
old scene files will need updating:
Old:
```ron
(
resources: {},
entities: {
4294967299: (
components: {
"bevy_render::camera::projection::OrthographicProjection": (
near: 0.0,
far: 1000.0,
viewport_origin: (
x: 0.5,
y: 0.5,
),
scaling_mode: WindowSize(1.0),
scale: 1.0,
area: (
min: (
x: -1.0,
y: -1.0,
),
max: (
x: 1.0,
y: 1.0,
),
),
),
},
),
},
)
```
New:
```ron
(
resources: {},
entities: {
4294967299: (
components: {
"bevy_render::camera::projection::OrthographicProjection": (
near: 0.0,
far: 1000.0,
viewport_origin: (0.5, 0.5),
scaling_mode: WindowSize(1.0),
scale: 1.0,
area: (
min: (-1.0, -1.0),
max: (1.0, 1.0),
),
),
},
),
},
)
```
---------
Co-authored-by: Gino Valente <49806985+MrGVSV@users.noreply.github.com>
2024-09-15 14:33:39 +00:00
|
|
|
let type_registration = type_registry.get(type_id)?;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
let component = type_registration
|
(De) serialize resources in scenes (#6846)
# Objective
Co-Authored-By: davier
[bricedavier@gmail.com](mailto:bricedavier@gmail.com)
Fixes #3576.
Adds a `resources` field in scene serialization data to allow
de/serializing resources that have reflection enabled.
## Solution
Most of this code is taken from a previous closed PR:
https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/pull/3580. Most of the credit goes to
@Davier , what I did was mostly getting it to work on the latest main
branch of Bevy, along with adding a few asserts in the currently
existing tests to be sure everything is working properly.
This PR changes the scene format to include resources in this way:
```
(
resources: {
// List of resources here, keyed by resource type name.
},
entities: [
// Previous scene format here
],
)
```
An example taken from the tests:
```
(
resources: {
"bevy_scene::serde::tests::MyResource": (
foo: 123,
),
},
entities: {
// Previous scene format here
},
)
```
For this, a `resources` fields has been added on the `DynamicScene` and
the `DynamicSceneBuilder` structs. The latter now also has a method
named `extract_resources` to properly extract the existing resources
registered in the local type registry, in a similar way to
`extract_entities`.
---
## Changelog
Added: Reflect resources registered in the type registry used by dynamic
scenes will now be properly de/serialized in scene data.
## Migration Guide
Since the scene format has been changed, the user may not be able to use
scenes saved prior to this PR due to the `resources` scene field being
missing. ~~To preserve backwards compatibility, I will try to make the
`resources` fully optional so that old scenes can be loaded without
issue.~~
## TODOs
- [x] I may have to update a few doc blocks still referring to dynamic
scenes as mere container of entities, since they now include resources
as well.
- [x] ~~I want to make the `resources` key optional, as specified in the
Migration Guide, so that old scenes will be compatible with this
change.~~ Since this would only be trivial for ron format, I think it
might be better to consider it in a separate PR/discussion to figure out
if it could be done for binary serialization too.
- [x] I suppose it might be a good idea to add a resources in the scene
example so that users will quickly notice they can serialize resources
just like entities.
---------
Co-authored-by: Carter Anderson <mcanders1@gmail.com>
2023-03-20 21:17:02 +00:00
|
|
|
.data::<ReflectComponent>()?
|
Make scene handling of entity references robust (#7335)
# Objective
- Handle dangling entity references inside scenes
- Handle references to entities with generation > 0 inside scenes
- Fix a latent bug in `Parent`'s `MapEntities` implementation, which
would, if the parent was outside the scene, cause the scene to be loaded
into the new world with a parent reference potentially pointing to some
random entity in that new world.
- Fixes #4793 and addresses #7235
## Solution
- DynamicScenes now identify entities with a `Entity` instead of a u32,
therefore including generation
- `World` exposes a new `reserve_generations` function that despawns an
entity and advances its generation by some extra amount.
- `MapEntities` implementations have a new `get_or_reserve` function
available that will always return an `Entity`, establishing a new
mapping to a dead entity when the entity they are called with is not in
the `EntityMap`. Subsequent calls with that same `Entity` will return
the same newly created dead entity reference, preserving equality
semantics.
- As a result, after loading a scene containing references to dead
entities (or entities otherwise outside the scene), those references
will all point to different generations on a single entity id in the new
world.
---
## Changelog
### Changed
- In serialized scenes, entities are now identified by a u64 instead of
a u32.
- In serialized scenes, components with entity references now have those
references serialize as u64s instead of structs.
### Fixed
- Scenes containing components with entity references will now
deserialize and add to a world reliably.
## Migration Guide
- `MapEntities` implementations must change from a `&EntityMap`
parameter to a `&mut EntityMapper` parameter and can no longer return a
`Result`. Finally, they should switch from calling `EntityMap::get` to
calling `EntityMapper::get_or_reserve`.
---------
Co-authored-by: Nicola Papale <nicopap@users.noreply.github.com>
2023-05-01 15:49:27 +00:00
|
|
|
.reflect(original_entity)?;
|
Use `FromReflect` when extracting entities in dynamic scenes (#15174)
# Objective
Fix #10284.
## Solution
When `DynamicSceneBuilder` extracts entities, they are cloned via
`PartialReflect::clone_value`, making them into dynamic versions of the
original components. This loses any custom `ReflectSerialize` type data.
Dynamic scenes are deserialized with the original types, not the dynamic
versions, and so any component with a custom serialize may fail. In this
case `Rect` and `Vec2`. The dynamic version includes the field names 'x'
and 'y' but the `Serialize` impl doesn't, hence the "expect float"
error.
The solution here: Instead of using `clone_value` to clone the
components, `FromReflect` clones and retains the original information
needed to serialize with any custom `Serialize` impls. I think using
something like `reflect_clone` from
(https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/pull/13432) might make this more
efficient.
I also did the same when deserializing dynamic scenes to appease some of
the round-trip tests which use `ReflectPartialEq`, which requires the
types be the same and not a unique/proxy pair. I'm not sure it's
otherwise necessary. Maybe this would also be more efficient when
spawning dynamic scenes with `reflect_clone` instead of `FromReflect`
again?
An alternative solution would be to fall back to the dynamic version
when deserializing `DynamicScene`s if the custom version fails. I think
that's possible. Or maybe simply always deserializing via the dynamic
route for dynamic scenes?
## Testing
This example is similar to the original test case in #10284:
``` rust
#![allow(missing_docs)]
use bevy::{prelude::*, scene::SceneInstanceReady};
fn main() {
App::new()
.add_plugins(DefaultPlugins)
.add_systems(Startup, (save, load).chain())
.observe(check)
.run();
}
static SAVEGAME_SAVE_PATH: &str = "savegame.scn.ron";
fn save(world: &mut World) {
let entity = world.spawn(OrthographicProjection::default()).id();
let scene = DynamicSceneBuilder::from_world(world)
.extract_entity(entity)
.build();
if let Some(registry) = world.get_resource::<AppTypeRegistry>() {
let registry = registry.read();
let serialized_scene = scene.serialize(®istry).unwrap();
// println!("{}", serialized_scene);
std::fs::write(format!("assets/{SAVEGAME_SAVE_PATH}"), serialized_scene).unwrap();
}
world.entity_mut(entity).despawn_recursive();
}
fn load(mut commands: Commands, asset_server: Res<AssetServer>) {
commands.spawn(DynamicSceneBundle {
scene: asset_server.load(SAVEGAME_SAVE_PATH),
..default()
});
}
fn check(_trigger: Trigger<SceneInstanceReady>, query: Query<&OrthographicProjection>) {
dbg!(query.single());
}
```
## Migration Guide
The `DynamicScene` format is changed to use custom serialize impls so
old scene files will need updating:
Old:
```ron
(
resources: {},
entities: {
4294967299: (
components: {
"bevy_render::camera::projection::OrthographicProjection": (
near: 0.0,
far: 1000.0,
viewport_origin: (
x: 0.5,
y: 0.5,
),
scaling_mode: WindowSize(1.0),
scale: 1.0,
area: (
min: (
x: -1.0,
y: -1.0,
),
max: (
x: 1.0,
y: 1.0,
),
),
),
},
),
},
)
```
New:
```ron
(
resources: {},
entities: {
4294967299: (
components: {
"bevy_render::camera::projection::OrthographicProjection": (
near: 0.0,
far: 1000.0,
viewport_origin: (0.5, 0.5),
scaling_mode: WindowSize(1.0),
scale: 1.0,
area: (
min: (-1.0, -1.0),
max: (1.0, 1.0),
),
),
},
),
},
)
```
---------
Co-authored-by: Gino Valente <49806985+MrGVSV@users.noreply.github.com>
2024-09-15 14:33:39 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Clone via `FromReflect`. Unlike `PartialReflect::clone_value` this
|
|
|
|
// retains the original type and `ReflectSerialize` type data which is needed to
|
|
|
|
// deserialize.
|
|
|
|
let component = type_registration
|
|
|
|
.data::<ReflectFromReflect>()
|
|
|
|
.and_then(|fr| fr.from_reflect(component.as_partial_reflect()))
|
|
|
|
.map(PartialReflect::into_partial_reflect)
|
|
|
|
.unwrap_or_else(|| component.clone_value());
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
entry.components.push(component);
|
(De) serialize resources in scenes (#6846)
# Objective
Co-Authored-By: davier
[bricedavier@gmail.com](mailto:bricedavier@gmail.com)
Fixes #3576.
Adds a `resources` field in scene serialization data to allow
de/serializing resources that have reflection enabled.
## Solution
Most of this code is taken from a previous closed PR:
https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/pull/3580. Most of the credit goes to
@Davier , what I did was mostly getting it to work on the latest main
branch of Bevy, along with adding a few asserts in the currently
existing tests to be sure everything is working properly.
This PR changes the scene format to include resources in this way:
```
(
resources: {
// List of resources here, keyed by resource type name.
},
entities: [
// Previous scene format here
],
)
```
An example taken from the tests:
```
(
resources: {
"bevy_scene::serde::tests::MyResource": (
foo: 123,
),
},
entities: {
// Previous scene format here
},
)
```
For this, a `resources` fields has been added on the `DynamicScene` and
the `DynamicSceneBuilder` structs. The latter now also has a method
named `extract_resources` to properly extract the existing resources
registered in the local type registry, in a similar way to
`extract_entities`.
---
## Changelog
Added: Reflect resources registered in the type registry used by dynamic
scenes will now be properly de/serialized in scene data.
## Migration Guide
Since the scene format has been changed, the user may not be able to use
scenes saved prior to this PR due to the `resources` scene field being
missing. ~~To preserve backwards compatibility, I will try to make the
`resources` fully optional so that old scenes can be loaded without
issue.~~
## TODOs
- [x] I may have to update a few doc blocks still referring to dynamic
scenes as mere container of entities, since they now include resources
as well.
- [x] ~~I want to make the `resources` key optional, as specified in the
Migration Guide, so that old scenes will be compatible with this
change.~~ Since this would only be trivial for ron format, I think it
might be better to consider it in a separate PR/discussion to figure out
if it could be done for binary serialization too.
- [x] I suppose it might be a good idea to add a resources in the scene
example so that users will quickly notice they can serialize resources
just like entities.
---------
Co-authored-by: Carter Anderson <mcanders1@gmail.com>
2023-03-20 21:17:02 +00:00
|
|
|
Some(())
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
extract_and_push();
|
2022-10-12 01:48:16 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
Make scene handling of entity references robust (#7335)
# Objective
- Handle dangling entity references inside scenes
- Handle references to entities with generation > 0 inside scenes
- Fix a latent bug in `Parent`'s `MapEntities` implementation, which
would, if the parent was outside the scene, cause the scene to be loaded
into the new world with a parent reference potentially pointing to some
random entity in that new world.
- Fixes #4793 and addresses #7235
## Solution
- DynamicScenes now identify entities with a `Entity` instead of a u32,
therefore including generation
- `World` exposes a new `reserve_generations` function that despawns an
entity and advances its generation by some extra amount.
- `MapEntities` implementations have a new `get_or_reserve` function
available that will always return an `Entity`, establishing a new
mapping to a dead entity when the entity they are called with is not in
the `EntityMap`. Subsequent calls with that same `Entity` will return
the same newly created dead entity reference, preserving equality
semantics.
- As a result, after loading a scene containing references to dead
entities (or entities otherwise outside the scene), those references
will all point to different generations on a single entity id in the new
world.
---
## Changelog
### Changed
- In serialized scenes, entities are now identified by a u64 instead of
a u32.
- In serialized scenes, components with entity references now have those
references serialize as u64s instead of structs.
### Fixed
- Scenes containing components with entity references will now
deserialize and add to a world reliably.
## Migration Guide
- `MapEntities` implementations must change from a `&EntityMap`
parameter to a `&mut EntityMapper` parameter and can no longer return a
`Result`. Finally, they should switch from calling `EntityMap::get` to
calling `EntityMapper::get_or_reserve`.
---------
Co-authored-by: Nicola Papale <nicopap@users.noreply.github.com>
2023-05-01 15:49:27 +00:00
|
|
|
self.extracted_scene.insert(entity, entry);
|
2022-10-12 01:48:16 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
self
|
|
|
|
}
|
(De) serialize resources in scenes (#6846)
# Objective
Co-Authored-By: davier
[bricedavier@gmail.com](mailto:bricedavier@gmail.com)
Fixes #3576.
Adds a `resources` field in scene serialization data to allow
de/serializing resources that have reflection enabled.
## Solution
Most of this code is taken from a previous closed PR:
https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/pull/3580. Most of the credit goes to
@Davier , what I did was mostly getting it to work on the latest main
branch of Bevy, along with adding a few asserts in the currently
existing tests to be sure everything is working properly.
This PR changes the scene format to include resources in this way:
```
(
resources: {
// List of resources here, keyed by resource type name.
},
entities: [
// Previous scene format here
],
)
```
An example taken from the tests:
```
(
resources: {
"bevy_scene::serde::tests::MyResource": (
foo: 123,
),
},
entities: {
// Previous scene format here
},
)
```
For this, a `resources` fields has been added on the `DynamicScene` and
the `DynamicSceneBuilder` structs. The latter now also has a method
named `extract_resources` to properly extract the existing resources
registered in the local type registry, in a similar way to
`extract_entities`.
---
## Changelog
Added: Reflect resources registered in the type registry used by dynamic
scenes will now be properly de/serialized in scene data.
## Migration Guide
Since the scene format has been changed, the user may not be able to use
scenes saved prior to this PR due to the `resources` scene field being
missing. ~~To preserve backwards compatibility, I will try to make the
`resources` fully optional so that old scenes can be loaded without
issue.~~
## TODOs
- [x] I may have to update a few doc blocks still referring to dynamic
scenes as mere container of entities, since they now include resources
as well.
- [x] ~~I want to make the `resources` key optional, as specified in the
Migration Guide, so that old scenes will be compatible with this
change.~~ Since this would only be trivial for ron format, I think it
might be better to consider it in a separate PR/discussion to figure out
if it could be done for binary serialization too.
- [x] I suppose it might be a good idea to add a resources in the scene
example so that users will quickly notice they can serialize resources
just like entities.
---------
Co-authored-by: Carter Anderson <mcanders1@gmail.com>
2023-03-20 21:17:02 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/// Extract resources from the builder's [`World`].
|
|
|
|
///
|
|
|
|
/// Re-extracting a resource that was already extracted will have no effect.
|
bevy_scene: Add `SceneFilter` (#6793)
# Objective
Currently, `DynamicScene`s extract all components listed in the given
(or the world's) type registry. This acts as a quasi-filter of sorts.
However, it can be troublesome to use effectively and lacks decent
control.
For example, say you need to serialize only the following component over
the network:
```rust
#[derive(Reflect, Component, Default)]
#[reflect(Component)]
struct NPC {
name: Option<String>
}
```
To do this, you'd need to:
1. Create a new `AppTypeRegistry`
2. Register `NPC`
3. Register `Option<String>`
If we skip Step 3, then the entire scene might fail to serialize as
`Option<String>` requires registration.
Not only is this annoying and easy to forget, but it can leave users
with an impossible task: serializing a third-party type that contains
private types.
Generally, the third-party crate will register their private types
within a plugin so the user doesn't need to do it themselves. However,
this means we are now unable to serialize _just_ that type— we're forced
to allow everything!
## Solution
Add the `SceneFilter` enum for filtering components to extract.
This filter can be used to optionally allow or deny entire sets of
components/resources. With the `DynamicSceneBuilder`, users have more
control over how their `DynamicScene`s are built.
To only serialize a subset of components, use the `allow` method:
```rust
let scene = builder
.allow::<ComponentA>()
.allow::<ComponentB>()
.extract_entity(entity)
.build();
```
To serialize everything _but_ a subset of components, use the `deny`
method:
```rust
let scene = builder
.deny::<ComponentA>()
.deny::<ComponentB>()
.extract_entity(entity)
.build();
```
Or create a custom filter:
```rust
let components = HashSet::from([type_id]);
let filter = SceneFilter::Allowlist(components);
// let filter = SceneFilter::Denylist(components);
let scene = builder
.with_filter(Some(filter))
.extract_entity(entity)
.build();
```
Similar operations exist for resources:
<details>
<summary>View Resource Methods</summary>
To only serialize a subset of resources, use the `allow_resource`
method:
```rust
let scene = builder
.allow_resource::<ResourceA>()
.extract_resources()
.build();
```
To serialize everything _but_ a subset of resources, use the
`deny_resource` method:
```rust
let scene = builder
.deny_resource::<ResourceA>()
.extract_resources()
.build();
```
Or create a custom filter:
```rust
let resources = HashSet::from([type_id]);
let filter = SceneFilter::Allowlist(resources);
// let filter = SceneFilter::Denylist(resources);
let scene = builder
.with_resource_filter(Some(filter))
.extract_resources()
.build();
```
</details>
### Open Questions
- [x] ~~`allow` and `deny` are mutually exclusive. Currently, they
overwrite each other. Should this instead be a panic?~~ Took @soqb's
suggestion and made it so that the opposing method simply removes that
type from the list.
- [x] ~~`DynamicSceneBuilder` extracts entity data as soon as
`extract_entity`/`extract_entities` is called. Should this behavior
instead be moved to the `build` method to prevent ordering mixups (e.g.
`.allow::<Foo>().extract_entity(entity)` vs
`.extract_entity(entity).allow::<Foo>()`)? The tradeoff would be
iterating over the given entities twice: once at extraction and again at
build.~~ Based on the feedback from @Testare it sounds like it might be
better to just keep the current functionality (if anything we can open a
separate PR that adds deferred methods for extraction, so the
choice/performance hit is up to the user).
- [ ] An alternative might be to remove the filter from
`DynamicSceneBuilder` and have it as a separate parameter to the
extraction methods (either in the existing ones or as added
`extract_entity_with_filter`-type methods). Is this preferable?
- [x] ~~Should we include constructors that include common types to
allow/deny? For example, a `SceneFilter::standard_allowlist` that
includes things like `Parent` and `Children`?~~ Consensus suggests we
should. I may split this out into a followup PR, though.
- [x] ~~Should we add the ability to remove types from the filter
regardless of whether an allowlist or denylist (e.g.
`filter.remove::<Foo>()`)?~~ See the first list item
- [x] ~~Should `SceneFilter` be an enum? Would it make more sense as a
struct that contains an `is_denylist` boolean?~~ With the added
`SceneFilter::None` state (replacing the need to wrap in an `Option` or
rely on an empty `Denylist`), it seems an enum is better suited now
- [x] ~~Bikeshed: Do we like the naming convention? Should we instead
use `include`/`exclude` terminology?~~ Sounds like we're sticking with
`allow`/`deny`!
- [x] ~~Does this feature need a new example? Do we simply include it in
the existing one (maybe even as a comment?)? Should this be done in a
followup PR instead?~~ Example will be added in a followup PR
### Followup Tasks
- [ ] Add a dedicated `SceneFilter` example
- [ ] Possibly add default types to the filter (e.g. deny things like
`ComputedVisibility`, allow `Parent`, etc)
---
## Changelog
- Added the `SceneFilter` enum for filtering components and resources
when building a `DynamicScene`
- Added methods:
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::with_filter`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::allow`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::deny`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::allow_all`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::deny_all`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::with_resource_filter`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::allow_resource`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::deny_resource`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::allow_all_resources`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::deny_all_resources`
- Removed methods:
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::from_world_with_type_registry`
- `DynamicScene::from_scene` and `DynamicScene::from_world` no longer
require an `AppTypeRegistry` reference
## Migration Guide
- `DynamicScene::from_scene` and `DynamicScene::from_world` no longer
require an `AppTypeRegistry` reference:
```rust
// OLD
let registry = world.resource::<AppTypeRegistry>();
let dynamic_scene = DynamicScene::from_world(&world, registry);
// let dynamic_scene = DynamicScene::from_scene(&scene, registry);
// NEW
let dynamic_scene = DynamicScene::from_world(&world);
// let dynamic_scene = DynamicScene::from_scene(&scene);
```
- Removed `DynamicSceneBuilder::from_world_with_type_registry`. Now the
registry is automatically taken from the given world:
```rust
// OLD
let registry = world.resource::<AppTypeRegistry>();
let builder = DynamicSceneBuilder::from_world_with_type_registry(&world,
registry);
// NEW
let builder = DynamicSceneBuilder::from_world(&world);
```
2023-07-06 21:04:26 +00:00
|
|
|
///
|
|
|
|
/// To control which resources are extracted, use the [`allow_resource`] or
|
|
|
|
/// [`deny_resource`] helper methods.
|
|
|
|
///
|
(De) serialize resources in scenes (#6846)
# Objective
Co-Authored-By: davier
[bricedavier@gmail.com](mailto:bricedavier@gmail.com)
Fixes #3576.
Adds a `resources` field in scene serialization data to allow
de/serializing resources that have reflection enabled.
## Solution
Most of this code is taken from a previous closed PR:
https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/pull/3580. Most of the credit goes to
@Davier , what I did was mostly getting it to work on the latest main
branch of Bevy, along with adding a few asserts in the currently
existing tests to be sure everything is working properly.
This PR changes the scene format to include resources in this way:
```
(
resources: {
// List of resources here, keyed by resource type name.
},
entities: [
// Previous scene format here
],
)
```
An example taken from the tests:
```
(
resources: {
"bevy_scene::serde::tests::MyResource": (
foo: 123,
),
},
entities: {
// Previous scene format here
},
)
```
For this, a `resources` fields has been added on the `DynamicScene` and
the `DynamicSceneBuilder` structs. The latter now also has a method
named `extract_resources` to properly extract the existing resources
registered in the local type registry, in a similar way to
`extract_entities`.
---
## Changelog
Added: Reflect resources registered in the type registry used by dynamic
scenes will now be properly de/serialized in scene data.
## Migration Guide
Since the scene format has been changed, the user may not be able to use
scenes saved prior to this PR due to the `resources` scene field being
missing. ~~To preserve backwards compatibility, I will try to make the
`resources` fully optional so that old scenes can be loaded without
issue.~~
## TODOs
- [x] I may have to update a few doc blocks still referring to dynamic
scenes as mere container of entities, since they now include resources
as well.
- [x] ~~I want to make the `resources` key optional, as specified in the
Migration Guide, so that old scenes will be compatible with this
change.~~ Since this would only be trivial for ron format, I think it
might be better to consider it in a separate PR/discussion to figure out
if it could be done for binary serialization too.
- [x] I suppose it might be a good idea to add a resources in the scene
example so that users will quickly notice they can serialize resources
just like entities.
---------
Co-authored-by: Carter Anderson <mcanders1@gmail.com>
2023-03-20 21:17:02 +00:00
|
|
|
/// ```
|
|
|
|
/// # use bevy_scene::DynamicSceneBuilder;
|
2023-06-21 17:25:01 +00:00
|
|
|
/// # use bevy_ecs::reflect::AppTypeRegistry;
|
(De) serialize resources in scenes (#6846)
# Objective
Co-Authored-By: davier
[bricedavier@gmail.com](mailto:bricedavier@gmail.com)
Fixes #3576.
Adds a `resources` field in scene serialization data to allow
de/serializing resources that have reflection enabled.
## Solution
Most of this code is taken from a previous closed PR:
https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/pull/3580. Most of the credit goes to
@Davier , what I did was mostly getting it to work on the latest main
branch of Bevy, along with adding a few asserts in the currently
existing tests to be sure everything is working properly.
This PR changes the scene format to include resources in this way:
```
(
resources: {
// List of resources here, keyed by resource type name.
},
entities: [
// Previous scene format here
],
)
```
An example taken from the tests:
```
(
resources: {
"bevy_scene::serde::tests::MyResource": (
foo: 123,
),
},
entities: {
// Previous scene format here
},
)
```
For this, a `resources` fields has been added on the `DynamicScene` and
the `DynamicSceneBuilder` structs. The latter now also has a method
named `extract_resources` to properly extract the existing resources
registered in the local type registry, in a similar way to
`extract_entities`.
---
## Changelog
Added: Reflect resources registered in the type registry used by dynamic
scenes will now be properly de/serialized in scene data.
## Migration Guide
Since the scene format has been changed, the user may not be able to use
scenes saved prior to this PR due to the `resources` scene field being
missing. ~~To preserve backwards compatibility, I will try to make the
`resources` fully optional so that old scenes can be loaded without
issue.~~
## TODOs
- [x] I may have to update a few doc blocks still referring to dynamic
scenes as mere container of entities, since they now include resources
as well.
- [x] ~~I want to make the `resources` key optional, as specified in the
Migration Guide, so that old scenes will be compatible with this
change.~~ Since this would only be trivial for ron format, I think it
might be better to consider it in a separate PR/discussion to figure out
if it could be done for binary serialization too.
- [x] I suppose it might be a good idea to add a resources in the scene
example so that users will quickly notice they can serialize resources
just like entities.
---------
Co-authored-by: Carter Anderson <mcanders1@gmail.com>
2023-03-20 21:17:02 +00:00
|
|
|
/// # use bevy_ecs::prelude::{ReflectResource, Resource, World};
|
|
|
|
/// # use bevy_reflect::Reflect;
|
|
|
|
/// #[derive(Resource, Default, Reflect)]
|
|
|
|
/// #[reflect(Resource)]
|
|
|
|
/// struct MyResource;
|
|
|
|
///
|
|
|
|
/// # let mut world = World::default();
|
|
|
|
/// # world.init_resource::<AppTypeRegistry>();
|
|
|
|
/// world.insert_resource(MyResource);
|
|
|
|
///
|
2023-10-09 19:46:17 +00:00
|
|
|
/// let mut builder = DynamicSceneBuilder::from_world(&world).extract_resources();
|
(De) serialize resources in scenes (#6846)
# Objective
Co-Authored-By: davier
[bricedavier@gmail.com](mailto:bricedavier@gmail.com)
Fixes #3576.
Adds a `resources` field in scene serialization data to allow
de/serializing resources that have reflection enabled.
## Solution
Most of this code is taken from a previous closed PR:
https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/pull/3580. Most of the credit goes to
@Davier , what I did was mostly getting it to work on the latest main
branch of Bevy, along with adding a few asserts in the currently
existing tests to be sure everything is working properly.
This PR changes the scene format to include resources in this way:
```
(
resources: {
// List of resources here, keyed by resource type name.
},
entities: [
// Previous scene format here
],
)
```
An example taken from the tests:
```
(
resources: {
"bevy_scene::serde::tests::MyResource": (
foo: 123,
),
},
entities: {
// Previous scene format here
},
)
```
For this, a `resources` fields has been added on the `DynamicScene` and
the `DynamicSceneBuilder` structs. The latter now also has a method
named `extract_resources` to properly extract the existing resources
registered in the local type registry, in a similar way to
`extract_entities`.
---
## Changelog
Added: Reflect resources registered in the type registry used by dynamic
scenes will now be properly de/serialized in scene data.
## Migration Guide
Since the scene format has been changed, the user may not be able to use
scenes saved prior to this PR due to the `resources` scene field being
missing. ~~To preserve backwards compatibility, I will try to make the
`resources` fully optional so that old scenes can be loaded without
issue.~~
## TODOs
- [x] I may have to update a few doc blocks still referring to dynamic
scenes as mere container of entities, since they now include resources
as well.
- [x] ~~I want to make the `resources` key optional, as specified in the
Migration Guide, so that old scenes will be compatible with this
change.~~ Since this would only be trivial for ron format, I think it
might be better to consider it in a separate PR/discussion to figure out
if it could be done for binary serialization too.
- [x] I suppose it might be a good idea to add a resources in the scene
example so that users will quickly notice they can serialize resources
just like entities.
---------
Co-authored-by: Carter Anderson <mcanders1@gmail.com>
2023-03-20 21:17:02 +00:00
|
|
|
/// let scene = builder.build();
|
|
|
|
/// ```
|
bevy_scene: Add `SceneFilter` (#6793)
# Objective
Currently, `DynamicScene`s extract all components listed in the given
(or the world's) type registry. This acts as a quasi-filter of sorts.
However, it can be troublesome to use effectively and lacks decent
control.
For example, say you need to serialize only the following component over
the network:
```rust
#[derive(Reflect, Component, Default)]
#[reflect(Component)]
struct NPC {
name: Option<String>
}
```
To do this, you'd need to:
1. Create a new `AppTypeRegistry`
2. Register `NPC`
3. Register `Option<String>`
If we skip Step 3, then the entire scene might fail to serialize as
`Option<String>` requires registration.
Not only is this annoying and easy to forget, but it can leave users
with an impossible task: serializing a third-party type that contains
private types.
Generally, the third-party crate will register their private types
within a plugin so the user doesn't need to do it themselves. However,
this means we are now unable to serialize _just_ that type— we're forced
to allow everything!
## Solution
Add the `SceneFilter` enum for filtering components to extract.
This filter can be used to optionally allow or deny entire sets of
components/resources. With the `DynamicSceneBuilder`, users have more
control over how their `DynamicScene`s are built.
To only serialize a subset of components, use the `allow` method:
```rust
let scene = builder
.allow::<ComponentA>()
.allow::<ComponentB>()
.extract_entity(entity)
.build();
```
To serialize everything _but_ a subset of components, use the `deny`
method:
```rust
let scene = builder
.deny::<ComponentA>()
.deny::<ComponentB>()
.extract_entity(entity)
.build();
```
Or create a custom filter:
```rust
let components = HashSet::from([type_id]);
let filter = SceneFilter::Allowlist(components);
// let filter = SceneFilter::Denylist(components);
let scene = builder
.with_filter(Some(filter))
.extract_entity(entity)
.build();
```
Similar operations exist for resources:
<details>
<summary>View Resource Methods</summary>
To only serialize a subset of resources, use the `allow_resource`
method:
```rust
let scene = builder
.allow_resource::<ResourceA>()
.extract_resources()
.build();
```
To serialize everything _but_ a subset of resources, use the
`deny_resource` method:
```rust
let scene = builder
.deny_resource::<ResourceA>()
.extract_resources()
.build();
```
Or create a custom filter:
```rust
let resources = HashSet::from([type_id]);
let filter = SceneFilter::Allowlist(resources);
// let filter = SceneFilter::Denylist(resources);
let scene = builder
.with_resource_filter(Some(filter))
.extract_resources()
.build();
```
</details>
### Open Questions
- [x] ~~`allow` and `deny` are mutually exclusive. Currently, they
overwrite each other. Should this instead be a panic?~~ Took @soqb's
suggestion and made it so that the opposing method simply removes that
type from the list.
- [x] ~~`DynamicSceneBuilder` extracts entity data as soon as
`extract_entity`/`extract_entities` is called. Should this behavior
instead be moved to the `build` method to prevent ordering mixups (e.g.
`.allow::<Foo>().extract_entity(entity)` vs
`.extract_entity(entity).allow::<Foo>()`)? The tradeoff would be
iterating over the given entities twice: once at extraction and again at
build.~~ Based on the feedback from @Testare it sounds like it might be
better to just keep the current functionality (if anything we can open a
separate PR that adds deferred methods for extraction, so the
choice/performance hit is up to the user).
- [ ] An alternative might be to remove the filter from
`DynamicSceneBuilder` and have it as a separate parameter to the
extraction methods (either in the existing ones or as added
`extract_entity_with_filter`-type methods). Is this preferable?
- [x] ~~Should we include constructors that include common types to
allow/deny? For example, a `SceneFilter::standard_allowlist` that
includes things like `Parent` and `Children`?~~ Consensus suggests we
should. I may split this out into a followup PR, though.
- [x] ~~Should we add the ability to remove types from the filter
regardless of whether an allowlist or denylist (e.g.
`filter.remove::<Foo>()`)?~~ See the first list item
- [x] ~~Should `SceneFilter` be an enum? Would it make more sense as a
struct that contains an `is_denylist` boolean?~~ With the added
`SceneFilter::None` state (replacing the need to wrap in an `Option` or
rely on an empty `Denylist`), it seems an enum is better suited now
- [x] ~~Bikeshed: Do we like the naming convention? Should we instead
use `include`/`exclude` terminology?~~ Sounds like we're sticking with
`allow`/`deny`!
- [x] ~~Does this feature need a new example? Do we simply include it in
the existing one (maybe even as a comment?)? Should this be done in a
followup PR instead?~~ Example will be added in a followup PR
### Followup Tasks
- [ ] Add a dedicated `SceneFilter` example
- [ ] Possibly add default types to the filter (e.g. deny things like
`ComputedVisibility`, allow `Parent`, etc)
---
## Changelog
- Added the `SceneFilter` enum for filtering components and resources
when building a `DynamicScene`
- Added methods:
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::with_filter`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::allow`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::deny`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::allow_all`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::deny_all`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::with_resource_filter`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::allow_resource`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::deny_resource`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::allow_all_resources`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::deny_all_resources`
- Removed methods:
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::from_world_with_type_registry`
- `DynamicScene::from_scene` and `DynamicScene::from_world` no longer
require an `AppTypeRegistry` reference
## Migration Guide
- `DynamicScene::from_scene` and `DynamicScene::from_world` no longer
require an `AppTypeRegistry` reference:
```rust
// OLD
let registry = world.resource::<AppTypeRegistry>();
let dynamic_scene = DynamicScene::from_world(&world, registry);
// let dynamic_scene = DynamicScene::from_scene(&scene, registry);
// NEW
let dynamic_scene = DynamicScene::from_world(&world);
// let dynamic_scene = DynamicScene::from_scene(&scene);
```
- Removed `DynamicSceneBuilder::from_world_with_type_registry`. Now the
registry is automatically taken from the given world:
```rust
// OLD
let registry = world.resource::<AppTypeRegistry>();
let builder = DynamicSceneBuilder::from_world_with_type_registry(&world,
registry);
// NEW
let builder = DynamicSceneBuilder::from_world(&world);
```
2023-07-06 21:04:26 +00:00
|
|
|
///
|
|
|
|
/// [`allow_resource`]: Self::allow_resource
|
|
|
|
/// [`deny_resource`]: Self::deny_resource
|
2023-10-09 19:46:17 +00:00
|
|
|
#[must_use]
|
|
|
|
pub fn extract_resources(mut self) -> Self {
|
bevy_scene: Add `SceneFilter` (#6793)
# Objective
Currently, `DynamicScene`s extract all components listed in the given
(or the world's) type registry. This acts as a quasi-filter of sorts.
However, it can be troublesome to use effectively and lacks decent
control.
For example, say you need to serialize only the following component over
the network:
```rust
#[derive(Reflect, Component, Default)]
#[reflect(Component)]
struct NPC {
name: Option<String>
}
```
To do this, you'd need to:
1. Create a new `AppTypeRegistry`
2. Register `NPC`
3. Register `Option<String>`
If we skip Step 3, then the entire scene might fail to serialize as
`Option<String>` requires registration.
Not only is this annoying and easy to forget, but it can leave users
with an impossible task: serializing a third-party type that contains
private types.
Generally, the third-party crate will register their private types
within a plugin so the user doesn't need to do it themselves. However,
this means we are now unable to serialize _just_ that type— we're forced
to allow everything!
## Solution
Add the `SceneFilter` enum for filtering components to extract.
This filter can be used to optionally allow or deny entire sets of
components/resources. With the `DynamicSceneBuilder`, users have more
control over how their `DynamicScene`s are built.
To only serialize a subset of components, use the `allow` method:
```rust
let scene = builder
.allow::<ComponentA>()
.allow::<ComponentB>()
.extract_entity(entity)
.build();
```
To serialize everything _but_ a subset of components, use the `deny`
method:
```rust
let scene = builder
.deny::<ComponentA>()
.deny::<ComponentB>()
.extract_entity(entity)
.build();
```
Or create a custom filter:
```rust
let components = HashSet::from([type_id]);
let filter = SceneFilter::Allowlist(components);
// let filter = SceneFilter::Denylist(components);
let scene = builder
.with_filter(Some(filter))
.extract_entity(entity)
.build();
```
Similar operations exist for resources:
<details>
<summary>View Resource Methods</summary>
To only serialize a subset of resources, use the `allow_resource`
method:
```rust
let scene = builder
.allow_resource::<ResourceA>()
.extract_resources()
.build();
```
To serialize everything _but_ a subset of resources, use the
`deny_resource` method:
```rust
let scene = builder
.deny_resource::<ResourceA>()
.extract_resources()
.build();
```
Or create a custom filter:
```rust
let resources = HashSet::from([type_id]);
let filter = SceneFilter::Allowlist(resources);
// let filter = SceneFilter::Denylist(resources);
let scene = builder
.with_resource_filter(Some(filter))
.extract_resources()
.build();
```
</details>
### Open Questions
- [x] ~~`allow` and `deny` are mutually exclusive. Currently, they
overwrite each other. Should this instead be a panic?~~ Took @soqb's
suggestion and made it so that the opposing method simply removes that
type from the list.
- [x] ~~`DynamicSceneBuilder` extracts entity data as soon as
`extract_entity`/`extract_entities` is called. Should this behavior
instead be moved to the `build` method to prevent ordering mixups (e.g.
`.allow::<Foo>().extract_entity(entity)` vs
`.extract_entity(entity).allow::<Foo>()`)? The tradeoff would be
iterating over the given entities twice: once at extraction and again at
build.~~ Based on the feedback from @Testare it sounds like it might be
better to just keep the current functionality (if anything we can open a
separate PR that adds deferred methods for extraction, so the
choice/performance hit is up to the user).
- [ ] An alternative might be to remove the filter from
`DynamicSceneBuilder` and have it as a separate parameter to the
extraction methods (either in the existing ones or as added
`extract_entity_with_filter`-type methods). Is this preferable?
- [x] ~~Should we include constructors that include common types to
allow/deny? For example, a `SceneFilter::standard_allowlist` that
includes things like `Parent` and `Children`?~~ Consensus suggests we
should. I may split this out into a followup PR, though.
- [x] ~~Should we add the ability to remove types from the filter
regardless of whether an allowlist or denylist (e.g.
`filter.remove::<Foo>()`)?~~ See the first list item
- [x] ~~Should `SceneFilter` be an enum? Would it make more sense as a
struct that contains an `is_denylist` boolean?~~ With the added
`SceneFilter::None` state (replacing the need to wrap in an `Option` or
rely on an empty `Denylist`), it seems an enum is better suited now
- [x] ~~Bikeshed: Do we like the naming convention? Should we instead
use `include`/`exclude` terminology?~~ Sounds like we're sticking with
`allow`/`deny`!
- [x] ~~Does this feature need a new example? Do we simply include it in
the existing one (maybe even as a comment?)? Should this be done in a
followup PR instead?~~ Example will be added in a followup PR
### Followup Tasks
- [ ] Add a dedicated `SceneFilter` example
- [ ] Possibly add default types to the filter (e.g. deny things like
`ComputedVisibility`, allow `Parent`, etc)
---
## Changelog
- Added the `SceneFilter` enum for filtering components and resources
when building a `DynamicScene`
- Added methods:
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::with_filter`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::allow`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::deny`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::allow_all`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::deny_all`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::with_resource_filter`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::allow_resource`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::deny_resource`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::allow_all_resources`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::deny_all_resources`
- Removed methods:
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::from_world_with_type_registry`
- `DynamicScene::from_scene` and `DynamicScene::from_world` no longer
require an `AppTypeRegistry` reference
## Migration Guide
- `DynamicScene::from_scene` and `DynamicScene::from_world` no longer
require an `AppTypeRegistry` reference:
```rust
// OLD
let registry = world.resource::<AppTypeRegistry>();
let dynamic_scene = DynamicScene::from_world(&world, registry);
// let dynamic_scene = DynamicScene::from_scene(&scene, registry);
// NEW
let dynamic_scene = DynamicScene::from_world(&world);
// let dynamic_scene = DynamicScene::from_scene(&scene);
```
- Removed `DynamicSceneBuilder::from_world_with_type_registry`. Now the
registry is automatically taken from the given world:
```rust
// OLD
let registry = world.resource::<AppTypeRegistry>();
let builder = DynamicSceneBuilder::from_world_with_type_registry(&world,
registry);
// NEW
let builder = DynamicSceneBuilder::from_world(&world);
```
2023-07-06 21:04:26 +00:00
|
|
|
let type_registry = self.original_world.resource::<AppTypeRegistry>().read();
|
|
|
|
|
(De) serialize resources in scenes (#6846)
# Objective
Co-Authored-By: davier
[bricedavier@gmail.com](mailto:bricedavier@gmail.com)
Fixes #3576.
Adds a `resources` field in scene serialization data to allow
de/serializing resources that have reflection enabled.
## Solution
Most of this code is taken from a previous closed PR:
https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/pull/3580. Most of the credit goes to
@Davier , what I did was mostly getting it to work on the latest main
branch of Bevy, along with adding a few asserts in the currently
existing tests to be sure everything is working properly.
This PR changes the scene format to include resources in this way:
```
(
resources: {
// List of resources here, keyed by resource type name.
},
entities: [
// Previous scene format here
],
)
```
An example taken from the tests:
```
(
resources: {
"bevy_scene::serde::tests::MyResource": (
foo: 123,
),
},
entities: {
// Previous scene format here
},
)
```
For this, a `resources` fields has been added on the `DynamicScene` and
the `DynamicSceneBuilder` structs. The latter now also has a method
named `extract_resources` to properly extract the existing resources
registered in the local type registry, in a similar way to
`extract_entities`.
---
## Changelog
Added: Reflect resources registered in the type registry used by dynamic
scenes will now be properly de/serialized in scene data.
## Migration Guide
Since the scene format has been changed, the user may not be able to use
scenes saved prior to this PR due to the `resources` scene field being
missing. ~~To preserve backwards compatibility, I will try to make the
`resources` fully optional so that old scenes can be loaded without
issue.~~
## TODOs
- [x] I may have to update a few doc blocks still referring to dynamic
scenes as mere container of entities, since they now include resources
as well.
- [x] ~~I want to make the `resources` key optional, as specified in the
Migration Guide, so that old scenes will be compatible with this
change.~~ Since this would only be trivial for ron format, I think it
might be better to consider it in a separate PR/discussion to figure out
if it could be done for binary serialization too.
- [x] I suppose it might be a good idea to add a resources in the scene
example so that users will quickly notice they can serialize resources
just like entities.
---------
Co-authored-by: Carter Anderson <mcanders1@gmail.com>
2023-03-20 21:17:02 +00:00
|
|
|
for (component_id, _) in self.original_world.storages().resources.iter() {
|
|
|
|
let mut extract_and_push = || {
|
|
|
|
let type_id = self
|
|
|
|
.original_world
|
|
|
|
.components()
|
|
|
|
.get_info(component_id)?
|
|
|
|
.type_id()?;
|
bevy_scene: Add `SceneFilter` (#6793)
# Objective
Currently, `DynamicScene`s extract all components listed in the given
(or the world's) type registry. This acts as a quasi-filter of sorts.
However, it can be troublesome to use effectively and lacks decent
control.
For example, say you need to serialize only the following component over
the network:
```rust
#[derive(Reflect, Component, Default)]
#[reflect(Component)]
struct NPC {
name: Option<String>
}
```
To do this, you'd need to:
1. Create a new `AppTypeRegistry`
2. Register `NPC`
3. Register `Option<String>`
If we skip Step 3, then the entire scene might fail to serialize as
`Option<String>` requires registration.
Not only is this annoying and easy to forget, but it can leave users
with an impossible task: serializing a third-party type that contains
private types.
Generally, the third-party crate will register their private types
within a plugin so the user doesn't need to do it themselves. However,
this means we are now unable to serialize _just_ that type— we're forced
to allow everything!
## Solution
Add the `SceneFilter` enum for filtering components to extract.
This filter can be used to optionally allow or deny entire sets of
components/resources. With the `DynamicSceneBuilder`, users have more
control over how their `DynamicScene`s are built.
To only serialize a subset of components, use the `allow` method:
```rust
let scene = builder
.allow::<ComponentA>()
.allow::<ComponentB>()
.extract_entity(entity)
.build();
```
To serialize everything _but_ a subset of components, use the `deny`
method:
```rust
let scene = builder
.deny::<ComponentA>()
.deny::<ComponentB>()
.extract_entity(entity)
.build();
```
Or create a custom filter:
```rust
let components = HashSet::from([type_id]);
let filter = SceneFilter::Allowlist(components);
// let filter = SceneFilter::Denylist(components);
let scene = builder
.with_filter(Some(filter))
.extract_entity(entity)
.build();
```
Similar operations exist for resources:
<details>
<summary>View Resource Methods</summary>
To only serialize a subset of resources, use the `allow_resource`
method:
```rust
let scene = builder
.allow_resource::<ResourceA>()
.extract_resources()
.build();
```
To serialize everything _but_ a subset of resources, use the
`deny_resource` method:
```rust
let scene = builder
.deny_resource::<ResourceA>()
.extract_resources()
.build();
```
Or create a custom filter:
```rust
let resources = HashSet::from([type_id]);
let filter = SceneFilter::Allowlist(resources);
// let filter = SceneFilter::Denylist(resources);
let scene = builder
.with_resource_filter(Some(filter))
.extract_resources()
.build();
```
</details>
### Open Questions
- [x] ~~`allow` and `deny` are mutually exclusive. Currently, they
overwrite each other. Should this instead be a panic?~~ Took @soqb's
suggestion and made it so that the opposing method simply removes that
type from the list.
- [x] ~~`DynamicSceneBuilder` extracts entity data as soon as
`extract_entity`/`extract_entities` is called. Should this behavior
instead be moved to the `build` method to prevent ordering mixups (e.g.
`.allow::<Foo>().extract_entity(entity)` vs
`.extract_entity(entity).allow::<Foo>()`)? The tradeoff would be
iterating over the given entities twice: once at extraction and again at
build.~~ Based on the feedback from @Testare it sounds like it might be
better to just keep the current functionality (if anything we can open a
separate PR that adds deferred methods for extraction, so the
choice/performance hit is up to the user).
- [ ] An alternative might be to remove the filter from
`DynamicSceneBuilder` and have it as a separate parameter to the
extraction methods (either in the existing ones or as added
`extract_entity_with_filter`-type methods). Is this preferable?
- [x] ~~Should we include constructors that include common types to
allow/deny? For example, a `SceneFilter::standard_allowlist` that
includes things like `Parent` and `Children`?~~ Consensus suggests we
should. I may split this out into a followup PR, though.
- [x] ~~Should we add the ability to remove types from the filter
regardless of whether an allowlist or denylist (e.g.
`filter.remove::<Foo>()`)?~~ See the first list item
- [x] ~~Should `SceneFilter` be an enum? Would it make more sense as a
struct that contains an `is_denylist` boolean?~~ With the added
`SceneFilter::None` state (replacing the need to wrap in an `Option` or
rely on an empty `Denylist`), it seems an enum is better suited now
- [x] ~~Bikeshed: Do we like the naming convention? Should we instead
use `include`/`exclude` terminology?~~ Sounds like we're sticking with
`allow`/`deny`!
- [x] ~~Does this feature need a new example? Do we simply include it in
the existing one (maybe even as a comment?)? Should this be done in a
followup PR instead?~~ Example will be added in a followup PR
### Followup Tasks
- [ ] Add a dedicated `SceneFilter` example
- [ ] Possibly add default types to the filter (e.g. deny things like
`ComputedVisibility`, allow `Parent`, etc)
---
## Changelog
- Added the `SceneFilter` enum for filtering components and resources
when building a `DynamicScene`
- Added methods:
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::with_filter`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::allow`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::deny`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::allow_all`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::deny_all`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::with_resource_filter`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::allow_resource`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::deny_resource`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::allow_all_resources`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::deny_all_resources`
- Removed methods:
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::from_world_with_type_registry`
- `DynamicScene::from_scene` and `DynamicScene::from_world` no longer
require an `AppTypeRegistry` reference
## Migration Guide
- `DynamicScene::from_scene` and `DynamicScene::from_world` no longer
require an `AppTypeRegistry` reference:
```rust
// OLD
let registry = world.resource::<AppTypeRegistry>();
let dynamic_scene = DynamicScene::from_world(&world, registry);
// let dynamic_scene = DynamicScene::from_scene(&scene, registry);
// NEW
let dynamic_scene = DynamicScene::from_world(&world);
// let dynamic_scene = DynamicScene::from_scene(&scene);
```
- Removed `DynamicSceneBuilder::from_world_with_type_registry`. Now the
registry is automatically taken from the given world:
```rust
// OLD
let registry = world.resource::<AppTypeRegistry>();
let builder = DynamicSceneBuilder::from_world_with_type_registry(&world,
registry);
// NEW
let builder = DynamicSceneBuilder::from_world(&world);
```
2023-07-06 21:04:26 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
let is_denied = self.resource_filter.is_denied_by_id(type_id);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if is_denied {
|
|
|
|
// Resource is either in the denylist or _not_ in the allowlist
|
|
|
|
return None;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2024-10-09 02:56:35 +00:00
|
|
|
let type_registration = type_registry.get(type_id)?;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
let resource = type_registration
|
(De) serialize resources in scenes (#6846)
# Objective
Co-Authored-By: davier
[bricedavier@gmail.com](mailto:bricedavier@gmail.com)
Fixes #3576.
Adds a `resources` field in scene serialization data to allow
de/serializing resources that have reflection enabled.
## Solution
Most of this code is taken from a previous closed PR:
https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/pull/3580. Most of the credit goes to
@Davier , what I did was mostly getting it to work on the latest main
branch of Bevy, along with adding a few asserts in the currently
existing tests to be sure everything is working properly.
This PR changes the scene format to include resources in this way:
```
(
resources: {
// List of resources here, keyed by resource type name.
},
entities: [
// Previous scene format here
],
)
```
An example taken from the tests:
```
(
resources: {
"bevy_scene::serde::tests::MyResource": (
foo: 123,
),
},
entities: {
// Previous scene format here
},
)
```
For this, a `resources` fields has been added on the `DynamicScene` and
the `DynamicSceneBuilder` structs. The latter now also has a method
named `extract_resources` to properly extract the existing resources
registered in the local type registry, in a similar way to
`extract_entities`.
---
## Changelog
Added: Reflect resources registered in the type registry used by dynamic
scenes will now be properly de/serialized in scene data.
## Migration Guide
Since the scene format has been changed, the user may not be able to use
scenes saved prior to this PR due to the `resources` scene field being
missing. ~~To preserve backwards compatibility, I will try to make the
`resources` fully optional so that old scenes can be loaded without
issue.~~
## TODOs
- [x] I may have to update a few doc blocks still referring to dynamic
scenes as mere container of entities, since they now include resources
as well.
- [x] ~~I want to make the `resources` key optional, as specified in the
Migration Guide, so that old scenes will be compatible with this
change.~~ Since this would only be trivial for ron format, I think it
might be better to consider it in a separate PR/discussion to figure out
if it could be done for binary serialization too.
- [x] I suppose it might be a good idea to add a resources in the scene
example so that users will quickly notice they can serialize resources
just like entities.
---------
Co-authored-by: Carter Anderson <mcanders1@gmail.com>
2023-03-20 21:17:02 +00:00
|
|
|
.data::<ReflectResource>()?
|
|
|
|
.reflect(self.original_world)?;
|
2024-10-09 02:56:35 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
let resource = type_registration
|
|
|
|
.data::<ReflectFromReflect>()
|
|
|
|
.and_then(|fr| fr.from_reflect(resource.as_partial_reflect()))
|
|
|
|
.map(PartialReflect::into_partial_reflect)
|
|
|
|
.unwrap_or_else(|| resource.clone_value());
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
self.extracted_resources.insert(component_id, resource);
|
(De) serialize resources in scenes (#6846)
# Objective
Co-Authored-By: davier
[bricedavier@gmail.com](mailto:bricedavier@gmail.com)
Fixes #3576.
Adds a `resources` field in scene serialization data to allow
de/serializing resources that have reflection enabled.
## Solution
Most of this code is taken from a previous closed PR:
https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/pull/3580. Most of the credit goes to
@Davier , what I did was mostly getting it to work on the latest main
branch of Bevy, along with adding a few asserts in the currently
existing tests to be sure everything is working properly.
This PR changes the scene format to include resources in this way:
```
(
resources: {
// List of resources here, keyed by resource type name.
},
entities: [
// Previous scene format here
],
)
```
An example taken from the tests:
```
(
resources: {
"bevy_scene::serde::tests::MyResource": (
foo: 123,
),
},
entities: {
// Previous scene format here
},
)
```
For this, a `resources` fields has been added on the `DynamicScene` and
the `DynamicSceneBuilder` structs. The latter now also has a method
named `extract_resources` to properly extract the existing resources
registered in the local type registry, in a similar way to
`extract_entities`.
---
## Changelog
Added: Reflect resources registered in the type registry used by dynamic
scenes will now be properly de/serialized in scene data.
## Migration Guide
Since the scene format has been changed, the user may not be able to use
scenes saved prior to this PR due to the `resources` scene field being
missing. ~~To preserve backwards compatibility, I will try to make the
`resources` fully optional so that old scenes can be loaded without
issue.~~
## TODOs
- [x] I may have to update a few doc blocks still referring to dynamic
scenes as mere container of entities, since they now include resources
as well.
- [x] ~~I want to make the `resources` key optional, as specified in the
Migration Guide, so that old scenes will be compatible with this
change.~~ Since this would only be trivial for ron format, I think it
might be better to consider it in a separate PR/discussion to figure out
if it could be done for binary serialization too.
- [x] I suppose it might be a good idea to add a resources in the scene
example so that users will quickly notice they can serialize resources
just like entities.
---------
Co-authored-by: Carter Anderson <mcanders1@gmail.com>
2023-03-20 21:17:02 +00:00
|
|
|
Some(())
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
extract_and_push();
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
drop(type_registry);
|
|
|
|
self
|
|
|
|
}
|
2022-10-12 01:48:16 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#[cfg(test)]
|
|
|
|
mod tests {
|
|
|
|
use bevy_ecs::{
|
2024-09-24 11:42:59 +00:00
|
|
|
component::Component,
|
|
|
|
prelude::{Entity, Resource},
|
|
|
|
query::With,
|
|
|
|
reflect::{AppTypeRegistry, ReflectComponent, ReflectResource},
|
2023-06-21 17:25:01 +00:00
|
|
|
world::World,
|
2022-10-12 01:48:16 +00:00
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
use bevy_reflect::Reflect;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
use super::DynamicSceneBuilder;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#[derive(Component, Reflect, Default, Eq, PartialEq, Debug)]
|
|
|
|
#[reflect(Component)]
|
|
|
|
struct ComponentA;
|
(De) serialize resources in scenes (#6846)
# Objective
Co-Authored-By: davier
[bricedavier@gmail.com](mailto:bricedavier@gmail.com)
Fixes #3576.
Adds a `resources` field in scene serialization data to allow
de/serializing resources that have reflection enabled.
## Solution
Most of this code is taken from a previous closed PR:
https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/pull/3580. Most of the credit goes to
@Davier , what I did was mostly getting it to work on the latest main
branch of Bevy, along with adding a few asserts in the currently
existing tests to be sure everything is working properly.
This PR changes the scene format to include resources in this way:
```
(
resources: {
// List of resources here, keyed by resource type name.
},
entities: [
// Previous scene format here
],
)
```
An example taken from the tests:
```
(
resources: {
"bevy_scene::serde::tests::MyResource": (
foo: 123,
),
},
entities: {
// Previous scene format here
},
)
```
For this, a `resources` fields has been added on the `DynamicScene` and
the `DynamicSceneBuilder` structs. The latter now also has a method
named `extract_resources` to properly extract the existing resources
registered in the local type registry, in a similar way to
`extract_entities`.
---
## Changelog
Added: Reflect resources registered in the type registry used by dynamic
scenes will now be properly de/serialized in scene data.
## Migration Guide
Since the scene format has been changed, the user may not be able to use
scenes saved prior to this PR due to the `resources` scene field being
missing. ~~To preserve backwards compatibility, I will try to make the
`resources` fully optional so that old scenes can be loaded without
issue.~~
## TODOs
- [x] I may have to update a few doc blocks still referring to dynamic
scenes as mere container of entities, since they now include resources
as well.
- [x] ~~I want to make the `resources` key optional, as specified in the
Migration Guide, so that old scenes will be compatible with this
change.~~ Since this would only be trivial for ron format, I think it
might be better to consider it in a separate PR/discussion to figure out
if it could be done for binary serialization too.
- [x] I suppose it might be a good idea to add a resources in the scene
example so that users will quickly notice they can serialize resources
just like entities.
---------
Co-authored-by: Carter Anderson <mcanders1@gmail.com>
2023-03-20 21:17:02 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2022-10-12 01:48:16 +00:00
|
|
|
#[derive(Component, Reflect, Default, Eq, PartialEq, Debug)]
|
|
|
|
#[reflect(Component)]
|
|
|
|
struct ComponentB;
|
|
|
|
|
(De) serialize resources in scenes (#6846)
# Objective
Co-Authored-By: davier
[bricedavier@gmail.com](mailto:bricedavier@gmail.com)
Fixes #3576.
Adds a `resources` field in scene serialization data to allow
de/serializing resources that have reflection enabled.
## Solution
Most of this code is taken from a previous closed PR:
https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/pull/3580. Most of the credit goes to
@Davier , what I did was mostly getting it to work on the latest main
branch of Bevy, along with adding a few asserts in the currently
existing tests to be sure everything is working properly.
This PR changes the scene format to include resources in this way:
```
(
resources: {
// List of resources here, keyed by resource type name.
},
entities: [
// Previous scene format here
],
)
```
An example taken from the tests:
```
(
resources: {
"bevy_scene::serde::tests::MyResource": (
foo: 123,
),
},
entities: {
// Previous scene format here
},
)
```
For this, a `resources` fields has been added on the `DynamicScene` and
the `DynamicSceneBuilder` structs. The latter now also has a method
named `extract_resources` to properly extract the existing resources
registered in the local type registry, in a similar way to
`extract_entities`.
---
## Changelog
Added: Reflect resources registered in the type registry used by dynamic
scenes will now be properly de/serialized in scene data.
## Migration Guide
Since the scene format has been changed, the user may not be able to use
scenes saved prior to this PR due to the `resources` scene field being
missing. ~~To preserve backwards compatibility, I will try to make the
`resources` fully optional so that old scenes can be loaded without
issue.~~
## TODOs
- [x] I may have to update a few doc blocks still referring to dynamic
scenes as mere container of entities, since they now include resources
as well.
- [x] ~~I want to make the `resources` key optional, as specified in the
Migration Guide, so that old scenes will be compatible with this
change.~~ Since this would only be trivial for ron format, I think it
might be better to consider it in a separate PR/discussion to figure out
if it could be done for binary serialization too.
- [x] I suppose it might be a good idea to add a resources in the scene
example so that users will quickly notice they can serialize resources
just like entities.
---------
Co-authored-by: Carter Anderson <mcanders1@gmail.com>
2023-03-20 21:17:02 +00:00
|
|
|
#[derive(Resource, Reflect, Default, Eq, PartialEq, Debug)]
|
|
|
|
#[reflect(Resource)]
|
|
|
|
struct ResourceA;
|
|
|
|
|
bevy_scene: Add `SceneFilter` (#6793)
# Objective
Currently, `DynamicScene`s extract all components listed in the given
(or the world's) type registry. This acts as a quasi-filter of sorts.
However, it can be troublesome to use effectively and lacks decent
control.
For example, say you need to serialize only the following component over
the network:
```rust
#[derive(Reflect, Component, Default)]
#[reflect(Component)]
struct NPC {
name: Option<String>
}
```
To do this, you'd need to:
1. Create a new `AppTypeRegistry`
2. Register `NPC`
3. Register `Option<String>`
If we skip Step 3, then the entire scene might fail to serialize as
`Option<String>` requires registration.
Not only is this annoying and easy to forget, but it can leave users
with an impossible task: serializing a third-party type that contains
private types.
Generally, the third-party crate will register their private types
within a plugin so the user doesn't need to do it themselves. However,
this means we are now unable to serialize _just_ that type— we're forced
to allow everything!
## Solution
Add the `SceneFilter` enum for filtering components to extract.
This filter can be used to optionally allow or deny entire sets of
components/resources. With the `DynamicSceneBuilder`, users have more
control over how their `DynamicScene`s are built.
To only serialize a subset of components, use the `allow` method:
```rust
let scene = builder
.allow::<ComponentA>()
.allow::<ComponentB>()
.extract_entity(entity)
.build();
```
To serialize everything _but_ a subset of components, use the `deny`
method:
```rust
let scene = builder
.deny::<ComponentA>()
.deny::<ComponentB>()
.extract_entity(entity)
.build();
```
Or create a custom filter:
```rust
let components = HashSet::from([type_id]);
let filter = SceneFilter::Allowlist(components);
// let filter = SceneFilter::Denylist(components);
let scene = builder
.with_filter(Some(filter))
.extract_entity(entity)
.build();
```
Similar operations exist for resources:
<details>
<summary>View Resource Methods</summary>
To only serialize a subset of resources, use the `allow_resource`
method:
```rust
let scene = builder
.allow_resource::<ResourceA>()
.extract_resources()
.build();
```
To serialize everything _but_ a subset of resources, use the
`deny_resource` method:
```rust
let scene = builder
.deny_resource::<ResourceA>()
.extract_resources()
.build();
```
Or create a custom filter:
```rust
let resources = HashSet::from([type_id]);
let filter = SceneFilter::Allowlist(resources);
// let filter = SceneFilter::Denylist(resources);
let scene = builder
.with_resource_filter(Some(filter))
.extract_resources()
.build();
```
</details>
### Open Questions
- [x] ~~`allow` and `deny` are mutually exclusive. Currently, they
overwrite each other. Should this instead be a panic?~~ Took @soqb's
suggestion and made it so that the opposing method simply removes that
type from the list.
- [x] ~~`DynamicSceneBuilder` extracts entity data as soon as
`extract_entity`/`extract_entities` is called. Should this behavior
instead be moved to the `build` method to prevent ordering mixups (e.g.
`.allow::<Foo>().extract_entity(entity)` vs
`.extract_entity(entity).allow::<Foo>()`)? The tradeoff would be
iterating over the given entities twice: once at extraction and again at
build.~~ Based on the feedback from @Testare it sounds like it might be
better to just keep the current functionality (if anything we can open a
separate PR that adds deferred methods for extraction, so the
choice/performance hit is up to the user).
- [ ] An alternative might be to remove the filter from
`DynamicSceneBuilder` and have it as a separate parameter to the
extraction methods (either in the existing ones or as added
`extract_entity_with_filter`-type methods). Is this preferable?
- [x] ~~Should we include constructors that include common types to
allow/deny? For example, a `SceneFilter::standard_allowlist` that
includes things like `Parent` and `Children`?~~ Consensus suggests we
should. I may split this out into a followup PR, though.
- [x] ~~Should we add the ability to remove types from the filter
regardless of whether an allowlist or denylist (e.g.
`filter.remove::<Foo>()`)?~~ See the first list item
- [x] ~~Should `SceneFilter` be an enum? Would it make more sense as a
struct that contains an `is_denylist` boolean?~~ With the added
`SceneFilter::None` state (replacing the need to wrap in an `Option` or
rely on an empty `Denylist`), it seems an enum is better suited now
- [x] ~~Bikeshed: Do we like the naming convention? Should we instead
use `include`/`exclude` terminology?~~ Sounds like we're sticking with
`allow`/`deny`!
- [x] ~~Does this feature need a new example? Do we simply include it in
the existing one (maybe even as a comment?)? Should this be done in a
followup PR instead?~~ Example will be added in a followup PR
### Followup Tasks
- [ ] Add a dedicated `SceneFilter` example
- [ ] Possibly add default types to the filter (e.g. deny things like
`ComputedVisibility`, allow `Parent`, etc)
---
## Changelog
- Added the `SceneFilter` enum for filtering components and resources
when building a `DynamicScene`
- Added methods:
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::with_filter`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::allow`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::deny`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::allow_all`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::deny_all`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::with_resource_filter`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::allow_resource`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::deny_resource`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::allow_all_resources`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::deny_all_resources`
- Removed methods:
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::from_world_with_type_registry`
- `DynamicScene::from_scene` and `DynamicScene::from_world` no longer
require an `AppTypeRegistry` reference
## Migration Guide
- `DynamicScene::from_scene` and `DynamicScene::from_world` no longer
require an `AppTypeRegistry` reference:
```rust
// OLD
let registry = world.resource::<AppTypeRegistry>();
let dynamic_scene = DynamicScene::from_world(&world, registry);
// let dynamic_scene = DynamicScene::from_scene(&scene, registry);
// NEW
let dynamic_scene = DynamicScene::from_world(&world);
// let dynamic_scene = DynamicScene::from_scene(&scene);
```
- Removed `DynamicSceneBuilder::from_world_with_type_registry`. Now the
registry is automatically taken from the given world:
```rust
// OLD
let registry = world.resource::<AppTypeRegistry>();
let builder = DynamicSceneBuilder::from_world_with_type_registry(&world,
registry);
// NEW
let builder = DynamicSceneBuilder::from_world(&world);
```
2023-07-06 21:04:26 +00:00
|
|
|
#[derive(Resource, Reflect, Default, Eq, PartialEq, Debug)]
|
|
|
|
#[reflect(Resource)]
|
|
|
|
struct ResourceB;
|
|
|
|
|
2022-10-12 01:48:16 +00:00
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
|
|
fn extract_one_entity() {
|
|
|
|
let mut world = World::default();
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
let atr = AppTypeRegistry::default();
|
|
|
|
atr.write().register::<ComponentA>();
|
|
|
|
world.insert_resource(atr);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
let entity = world.spawn((ComponentA, ComponentB)).id();
|
|
|
|
|
2023-10-09 19:46:17 +00:00
|
|
|
let scene = DynamicSceneBuilder::from_world(&world)
|
|
|
|
.extract_entity(entity)
|
|
|
|
.build();
|
2022-10-12 01:48:16 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(scene.entities.len(), 1);
|
Make scene handling of entity references robust (#7335)
# Objective
- Handle dangling entity references inside scenes
- Handle references to entities with generation > 0 inside scenes
- Fix a latent bug in `Parent`'s `MapEntities` implementation, which
would, if the parent was outside the scene, cause the scene to be loaded
into the new world with a parent reference potentially pointing to some
random entity in that new world.
- Fixes #4793 and addresses #7235
## Solution
- DynamicScenes now identify entities with a `Entity` instead of a u32,
therefore including generation
- `World` exposes a new `reserve_generations` function that despawns an
entity and advances its generation by some extra amount.
- `MapEntities` implementations have a new `get_or_reserve` function
available that will always return an `Entity`, establishing a new
mapping to a dead entity when the entity they are called with is not in
the `EntityMap`. Subsequent calls with that same `Entity` will return
the same newly created dead entity reference, preserving equality
semantics.
- As a result, after loading a scene containing references to dead
entities (or entities otherwise outside the scene), those references
will all point to different generations on a single entity id in the new
world.
---
## Changelog
### Changed
- In serialized scenes, entities are now identified by a u64 instead of
a u32.
- In serialized scenes, components with entity references now have those
references serialize as u64s instead of structs.
### Fixed
- Scenes containing components with entity references will now
deserialize and add to a world reliably.
## Migration Guide
- `MapEntities` implementations must change from a `&EntityMap`
parameter to a `&mut EntityMapper` parameter and can no longer return a
`Result`. Finally, they should switch from calling `EntityMap::get` to
calling `EntityMapper::get_or_reserve`.
---------
Co-authored-by: Nicola Papale <nicopap@users.noreply.github.com>
2023-05-01 15:49:27 +00:00
|
|
|
assert_eq!(scene.entities[0].entity, entity);
|
2022-10-12 01:48:16 +00:00
|
|
|
assert_eq!(scene.entities[0].components.len(), 1);
|
|
|
|
assert!(scene.entities[0].components[0].represents::<ComponentA>());
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
|
|
fn extract_one_entity_twice() {
|
|
|
|
let mut world = World::default();
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
let atr = AppTypeRegistry::default();
|
|
|
|
atr.write().register::<ComponentA>();
|
|
|
|
world.insert_resource(atr);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
let entity = world.spawn((ComponentA, ComponentB)).id();
|
|
|
|
|
2023-10-09 19:46:17 +00:00
|
|
|
let scene = DynamicSceneBuilder::from_world(&world)
|
|
|
|
.extract_entity(entity)
|
|
|
|
.extract_entity(entity)
|
|
|
|
.build();
|
2022-10-12 01:48:16 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(scene.entities.len(), 1);
|
Make scene handling of entity references robust (#7335)
# Objective
- Handle dangling entity references inside scenes
- Handle references to entities with generation > 0 inside scenes
- Fix a latent bug in `Parent`'s `MapEntities` implementation, which
would, if the parent was outside the scene, cause the scene to be loaded
into the new world with a parent reference potentially pointing to some
random entity in that new world.
- Fixes #4793 and addresses #7235
## Solution
- DynamicScenes now identify entities with a `Entity` instead of a u32,
therefore including generation
- `World` exposes a new `reserve_generations` function that despawns an
entity and advances its generation by some extra amount.
- `MapEntities` implementations have a new `get_or_reserve` function
available that will always return an `Entity`, establishing a new
mapping to a dead entity when the entity they are called with is not in
the `EntityMap`. Subsequent calls with that same `Entity` will return
the same newly created dead entity reference, preserving equality
semantics.
- As a result, after loading a scene containing references to dead
entities (or entities otherwise outside the scene), those references
will all point to different generations on a single entity id in the new
world.
---
## Changelog
### Changed
- In serialized scenes, entities are now identified by a u64 instead of
a u32.
- In serialized scenes, components with entity references now have those
references serialize as u64s instead of structs.
### Fixed
- Scenes containing components with entity references will now
deserialize and add to a world reliably.
## Migration Guide
- `MapEntities` implementations must change from a `&EntityMap`
parameter to a `&mut EntityMapper` parameter and can no longer return a
`Result`. Finally, they should switch from calling `EntityMap::get` to
calling `EntityMapper::get_or_reserve`.
---------
Co-authored-by: Nicola Papale <nicopap@users.noreply.github.com>
2023-05-01 15:49:27 +00:00
|
|
|
assert_eq!(scene.entities[0].entity, entity);
|
2022-10-12 01:48:16 +00:00
|
|
|
assert_eq!(scene.entities[0].components.len(), 1);
|
|
|
|
assert!(scene.entities[0].components[0].represents::<ComponentA>());
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
|
|
fn extract_one_entity_two_components() {
|
|
|
|
let mut world = World::default();
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
let atr = AppTypeRegistry::default();
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
let mut register = atr.write();
|
|
|
|
register.register::<ComponentA>();
|
|
|
|
register.register::<ComponentB>();
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
world.insert_resource(atr);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
let entity = world.spawn((ComponentA, ComponentB)).id();
|
|
|
|
|
2023-10-09 19:46:17 +00:00
|
|
|
let scene = DynamicSceneBuilder::from_world(&world)
|
|
|
|
.extract_entity(entity)
|
|
|
|
.build();
|
2022-10-12 01:48:16 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(scene.entities.len(), 1);
|
Make scene handling of entity references robust (#7335)
# Objective
- Handle dangling entity references inside scenes
- Handle references to entities with generation > 0 inside scenes
- Fix a latent bug in `Parent`'s `MapEntities` implementation, which
would, if the parent was outside the scene, cause the scene to be loaded
into the new world with a parent reference potentially pointing to some
random entity in that new world.
- Fixes #4793 and addresses #7235
## Solution
- DynamicScenes now identify entities with a `Entity` instead of a u32,
therefore including generation
- `World` exposes a new `reserve_generations` function that despawns an
entity and advances its generation by some extra amount.
- `MapEntities` implementations have a new `get_or_reserve` function
available that will always return an `Entity`, establishing a new
mapping to a dead entity when the entity they are called with is not in
the `EntityMap`. Subsequent calls with that same `Entity` will return
the same newly created dead entity reference, preserving equality
semantics.
- As a result, after loading a scene containing references to dead
entities (or entities otherwise outside the scene), those references
will all point to different generations on a single entity id in the new
world.
---
## Changelog
### Changed
- In serialized scenes, entities are now identified by a u64 instead of
a u32.
- In serialized scenes, components with entity references now have those
references serialize as u64s instead of structs.
### Fixed
- Scenes containing components with entity references will now
deserialize and add to a world reliably.
## Migration Guide
- `MapEntities` implementations must change from a `&EntityMap`
parameter to a `&mut EntityMapper` parameter and can no longer return a
`Result`. Finally, they should switch from calling `EntityMap::get` to
calling `EntityMapper::get_or_reserve`.
---------
Co-authored-by: Nicola Papale <nicopap@users.noreply.github.com>
2023-05-01 15:49:27 +00:00
|
|
|
assert_eq!(scene.entities[0].entity, entity);
|
2022-10-12 01:48:16 +00:00
|
|
|
assert_eq!(scene.entities[0].components.len(), 2);
|
|
|
|
assert!(scene.entities[0].components[0].represents::<ComponentA>());
|
|
|
|
assert!(scene.entities[0].components[1].represents::<ComponentB>());
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2022-10-27 23:38:03 +00:00
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
|
|
fn extract_entity_order() {
|
|
|
|
let mut world = World::default();
|
|
|
|
world.init_resource::<AppTypeRegistry>();
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Spawn entities in order
|
|
|
|
let entity_a = world.spawn_empty().id();
|
|
|
|
let entity_b = world.spawn_empty().id();
|
|
|
|
let entity_c = world.spawn_empty().id();
|
|
|
|
let entity_d = world.spawn_empty().id();
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Insert entities out of order
|
2023-10-09 19:46:17 +00:00
|
|
|
let builder = DynamicSceneBuilder::from_world(&world)
|
|
|
|
.extract_entity(entity_b)
|
|
|
|
.extract_entities([entity_d, entity_a].into_iter())
|
|
|
|
.extract_entity(entity_c);
|
2022-10-27 23:38:03 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
let mut entities = builder.build().entities.into_iter();
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Assert entities are ordered
|
Make scene handling of entity references robust (#7335)
# Objective
- Handle dangling entity references inside scenes
- Handle references to entities with generation > 0 inside scenes
- Fix a latent bug in `Parent`'s `MapEntities` implementation, which
would, if the parent was outside the scene, cause the scene to be loaded
into the new world with a parent reference potentially pointing to some
random entity in that new world.
- Fixes #4793 and addresses #7235
## Solution
- DynamicScenes now identify entities with a `Entity` instead of a u32,
therefore including generation
- `World` exposes a new `reserve_generations` function that despawns an
entity and advances its generation by some extra amount.
- `MapEntities` implementations have a new `get_or_reserve` function
available that will always return an `Entity`, establishing a new
mapping to a dead entity when the entity they are called with is not in
the `EntityMap`. Subsequent calls with that same `Entity` will return
the same newly created dead entity reference, preserving equality
semantics.
- As a result, after loading a scene containing references to dead
entities (or entities otherwise outside the scene), those references
will all point to different generations on a single entity id in the new
world.
---
## Changelog
### Changed
- In serialized scenes, entities are now identified by a u64 instead of
a u32.
- In serialized scenes, components with entity references now have those
references serialize as u64s instead of structs.
### Fixed
- Scenes containing components with entity references will now
deserialize and add to a world reliably.
## Migration Guide
- `MapEntities` implementations must change from a `&EntityMap`
parameter to a `&mut EntityMapper` parameter and can no longer return a
`Result`. Finally, they should switch from calling `EntityMap::get` to
calling `EntityMapper::get_or_reserve`.
---------
Co-authored-by: Nicola Papale <nicopap@users.noreply.github.com>
2023-05-01 15:49:27 +00:00
|
|
|
assert_eq!(entity_a, entities.next().map(|e| e.entity).unwrap());
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(entity_b, entities.next().map(|e| e.entity).unwrap());
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(entity_c, entities.next().map(|e| e.entity).unwrap());
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(entity_d, entities.next().map(|e| e.entity).unwrap());
|
2022-10-27 23:38:03 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2022-10-12 01:48:16 +00:00
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
|
|
fn extract_query() {
|
|
|
|
let mut world = World::default();
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
let atr = AppTypeRegistry::default();
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
let mut register = atr.write();
|
|
|
|
register.register::<ComponentA>();
|
|
|
|
register.register::<ComponentB>();
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
world.insert_resource(atr);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
let entity_a_b = world.spawn((ComponentA, ComponentB)).id();
|
|
|
|
let entity_a = world.spawn(ComponentA).id();
|
|
|
|
let _entity_b = world.spawn(ComponentB).id();
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
let mut query = world.query_filtered::<Entity, With<ComponentA>>();
|
2023-10-09 19:46:17 +00:00
|
|
|
let scene = DynamicSceneBuilder::from_world(&world)
|
|
|
|
.extract_entities(query.iter(&world))
|
|
|
|
.build();
|
2022-10-12 01:48:16 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(scene.entities.len(), 2);
|
|
|
|
let mut scene_entities = vec![scene.entities[0].entity, scene.entities[1].entity];
|
|
|
|
scene_entities.sort();
|
Make scene handling of entity references robust (#7335)
# Objective
- Handle dangling entity references inside scenes
- Handle references to entities with generation > 0 inside scenes
- Fix a latent bug in `Parent`'s `MapEntities` implementation, which
would, if the parent was outside the scene, cause the scene to be loaded
into the new world with a parent reference potentially pointing to some
random entity in that new world.
- Fixes #4793 and addresses #7235
## Solution
- DynamicScenes now identify entities with a `Entity` instead of a u32,
therefore including generation
- `World` exposes a new `reserve_generations` function that despawns an
entity and advances its generation by some extra amount.
- `MapEntities` implementations have a new `get_or_reserve` function
available that will always return an `Entity`, establishing a new
mapping to a dead entity when the entity they are called with is not in
the `EntityMap`. Subsequent calls with that same `Entity` will return
the same newly created dead entity reference, preserving equality
semantics.
- As a result, after loading a scene containing references to dead
entities (or entities otherwise outside the scene), those references
will all point to different generations on a single entity id in the new
world.
---
## Changelog
### Changed
- In serialized scenes, entities are now identified by a u64 instead of
a u32.
- In serialized scenes, components with entity references now have those
references serialize as u64s instead of structs.
### Fixed
- Scenes containing components with entity references will now
deserialize and add to a world reliably.
## Migration Guide
- `MapEntities` implementations must change from a `&EntityMap`
parameter to a `&mut EntityMapper` parameter and can no longer return a
`Result`. Finally, they should switch from calling `EntityMap::get` to
calling `EntityMapper::get_or_reserve`.
---------
Co-authored-by: Nicola Papale <nicopap@users.noreply.github.com>
2023-05-01 15:49:27 +00:00
|
|
|
assert_eq!(scene_entities, [entity_a_b, entity_a]);
|
2022-10-12 01:48:16 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
2022-12-20 16:16:58 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
|
|
fn remove_componentless_entity() {
|
|
|
|
let mut world = World::default();
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
let atr = AppTypeRegistry::default();
|
|
|
|
atr.write().register::<ComponentA>();
|
|
|
|
world.insert_resource(atr);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
let entity_a = world.spawn(ComponentA).id();
|
|
|
|
let entity_b = world.spawn(ComponentB).id();
|
|
|
|
|
2023-10-09 19:46:17 +00:00
|
|
|
let scene = DynamicSceneBuilder::from_world(&world)
|
|
|
|
.extract_entities([entity_a, entity_b].into_iter())
|
|
|
|
.remove_empty_entities()
|
|
|
|
.build();
|
2022-12-20 16:16:58 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(scene.entities.len(), 1);
|
Make scene handling of entity references robust (#7335)
# Objective
- Handle dangling entity references inside scenes
- Handle references to entities with generation > 0 inside scenes
- Fix a latent bug in `Parent`'s `MapEntities` implementation, which
would, if the parent was outside the scene, cause the scene to be loaded
into the new world with a parent reference potentially pointing to some
random entity in that new world.
- Fixes #4793 and addresses #7235
## Solution
- DynamicScenes now identify entities with a `Entity` instead of a u32,
therefore including generation
- `World` exposes a new `reserve_generations` function that despawns an
entity and advances its generation by some extra amount.
- `MapEntities` implementations have a new `get_or_reserve` function
available that will always return an `Entity`, establishing a new
mapping to a dead entity when the entity they are called with is not in
the `EntityMap`. Subsequent calls with that same `Entity` will return
the same newly created dead entity reference, preserving equality
semantics.
- As a result, after loading a scene containing references to dead
entities (or entities otherwise outside the scene), those references
will all point to different generations on a single entity id in the new
world.
---
## Changelog
### Changed
- In serialized scenes, entities are now identified by a u64 instead of
a u32.
- In serialized scenes, components with entity references now have those
references serialize as u64s instead of structs.
### Fixed
- Scenes containing components with entity references will now
deserialize and add to a world reliably.
## Migration Guide
- `MapEntities` implementations must change from a `&EntityMap`
parameter to a `&mut EntityMapper` parameter and can no longer return a
`Result`. Finally, they should switch from calling `EntityMap::get` to
calling `EntityMapper::get_or_reserve`.
---------
Co-authored-by: Nicola Papale <nicopap@users.noreply.github.com>
2023-05-01 15:49:27 +00:00
|
|
|
assert_eq!(scene.entities[0].entity, entity_a);
|
2022-12-20 16:16:58 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
(De) serialize resources in scenes (#6846)
# Objective
Co-Authored-By: davier
[bricedavier@gmail.com](mailto:bricedavier@gmail.com)
Fixes #3576.
Adds a `resources` field in scene serialization data to allow
de/serializing resources that have reflection enabled.
## Solution
Most of this code is taken from a previous closed PR:
https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/pull/3580. Most of the credit goes to
@Davier , what I did was mostly getting it to work on the latest main
branch of Bevy, along with adding a few asserts in the currently
existing tests to be sure everything is working properly.
This PR changes the scene format to include resources in this way:
```
(
resources: {
// List of resources here, keyed by resource type name.
},
entities: [
// Previous scene format here
],
)
```
An example taken from the tests:
```
(
resources: {
"bevy_scene::serde::tests::MyResource": (
foo: 123,
),
},
entities: {
// Previous scene format here
},
)
```
For this, a `resources` fields has been added on the `DynamicScene` and
the `DynamicSceneBuilder` structs. The latter now also has a method
named `extract_resources` to properly extract the existing resources
registered in the local type registry, in a similar way to
`extract_entities`.
---
## Changelog
Added: Reflect resources registered in the type registry used by dynamic
scenes will now be properly de/serialized in scene data.
## Migration Guide
Since the scene format has been changed, the user may not be able to use
scenes saved prior to this PR due to the `resources` scene field being
missing. ~~To preserve backwards compatibility, I will try to make the
`resources` fully optional so that old scenes can be loaded without
issue.~~
## TODOs
- [x] I may have to update a few doc blocks still referring to dynamic
scenes as mere container of entities, since they now include resources
as well.
- [x] ~~I want to make the `resources` key optional, as specified in the
Migration Guide, so that old scenes will be compatible with this
change.~~ Since this would only be trivial for ron format, I think it
might be better to consider it in a separate PR/discussion to figure out
if it could be done for binary serialization too.
- [x] I suppose it might be a good idea to add a resources in the scene
example so that users will quickly notice they can serialize resources
just like entities.
---------
Co-authored-by: Carter Anderson <mcanders1@gmail.com>
2023-03-20 21:17:02 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
|
|
fn extract_one_resource() {
|
|
|
|
let mut world = World::default();
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
let atr = AppTypeRegistry::default();
|
|
|
|
atr.write().register::<ResourceA>();
|
|
|
|
world.insert_resource(atr);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
world.insert_resource(ResourceA);
|
|
|
|
|
2023-10-09 19:46:17 +00:00
|
|
|
let scene = DynamicSceneBuilder::from_world(&world)
|
|
|
|
.extract_resources()
|
|
|
|
.build();
|
(De) serialize resources in scenes (#6846)
# Objective
Co-Authored-By: davier
[bricedavier@gmail.com](mailto:bricedavier@gmail.com)
Fixes #3576.
Adds a `resources` field in scene serialization data to allow
de/serializing resources that have reflection enabled.
## Solution
Most of this code is taken from a previous closed PR:
https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/pull/3580. Most of the credit goes to
@Davier , what I did was mostly getting it to work on the latest main
branch of Bevy, along with adding a few asserts in the currently
existing tests to be sure everything is working properly.
This PR changes the scene format to include resources in this way:
```
(
resources: {
// List of resources here, keyed by resource type name.
},
entities: [
// Previous scene format here
],
)
```
An example taken from the tests:
```
(
resources: {
"bevy_scene::serde::tests::MyResource": (
foo: 123,
),
},
entities: {
// Previous scene format here
},
)
```
For this, a `resources` fields has been added on the `DynamicScene` and
the `DynamicSceneBuilder` structs. The latter now also has a method
named `extract_resources` to properly extract the existing resources
registered in the local type registry, in a similar way to
`extract_entities`.
---
## Changelog
Added: Reflect resources registered in the type registry used by dynamic
scenes will now be properly de/serialized in scene data.
## Migration Guide
Since the scene format has been changed, the user may not be able to use
scenes saved prior to this PR due to the `resources` scene field being
missing. ~~To preserve backwards compatibility, I will try to make the
`resources` fully optional so that old scenes can be loaded without
issue.~~
## TODOs
- [x] I may have to update a few doc blocks still referring to dynamic
scenes as mere container of entities, since they now include resources
as well.
- [x] ~~I want to make the `resources` key optional, as specified in the
Migration Guide, so that old scenes will be compatible with this
change.~~ Since this would only be trivial for ron format, I think it
might be better to consider it in a separate PR/discussion to figure out
if it could be done for binary serialization too.
- [x] I suppose it might be a good idea to add a resources in the scene
example so that users will quickly notice they can serialize resources
just like entities.
---------
Co-authored-by: Carter Anderson <mcanders1@gmail.com>
2023-03-20 21:17:02 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(scene.resources.len(), 1);
|
|
|
|
assert!(scene.resources[0].represents::<ResourceA>());
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
|
|
fn extract_one_resource_twice() {
|
|
|
|
let mut world = World::default();
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
let atr = AppTypeRegistry::default();
|
|
|
|
atr.write().register::<ResourceA>();
|
|
|
|
world.insert_resource(atr);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
world.insert_resource(ResourceA);
|
|
|
|
|
2023-10-09 19:46:17 +00:00
|
|
|
let scene = DynamicSceneBuilder::from_world(&world)
|
|
|
|
.extract_resources()
|
|
|
|
.extract_resources()
|
|
|
|
.build();
|
(De) serialize resources in scenes (#6846)
# Objective
Co-Authored-By: davier
[bricedavier@gmail.com](mailto:bricedavier@gmail.com)
Fixes #3576.
Adds a `resources` field in scene serialization data to allow
de/serializing resources that have reflection enabled.
## Solution
Most of this code is taken from a previous closed PR:
https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/pull/3580. Most of the credit goes to
@Davier , what I did was mostly getting it to work on the latest main
branch of Bevy, along with adding a few asserts in the currently
existing tests to be sure everything is working properly.
This PR changes the scene format to include resources in this way:
```
(
resources: {
// List of resources here, keyed by resource type name.
},
entities: [
// Previous scene format here
],
)
```
An example taken from the tests:
```
(
resources: {
"bevy_scene::serde::tests::MyResource": (
foo: 123,
),
},
entities: {
// Previous scene format here
},
)
```
For this, a `resources` fields has been added on the `DynamicScene` and
the `DynamicSceneBuilder` structs. The latter now also has a method
named `extract_resources` to properly extract the existing resources
registered in the local type registry, in a similar way to
`extract_entities`.
---
## Changelog
Added: Reflect resources registered in the type registry used by dynamic
scenes will now be properly de/serialized in scene data.
## Migration Guide
Since the scene format has been changed, the user may not be able to use
scenes saved prior to this PR due to the `resources` scene field being
missing. ~~To preserve backwards compatibility, I will try to make the
`resources` fully optional so that old scenes can be loaded without
issue.~~
## TODOs
- [x] I may have to update a few doc blocks still referring to dynamic
scenes as mere container of entities, since they now include resources
as well.
- [x] ~~I want to make the `resources` key optional, as specified in the
Migration Guide, so that old scenes will be compatible with this
change.~~ Since this would only be trivial for ron format, I think it
might be better to consider it in a separate PR/discussion to figure out
if it could be done for binary serialization too.
- [x] I suppose it might be a good idea to add a resources in the scene
example so that users will quickly notice they can serialize resources
just like entities.
---------
Co-authored-by: Carter Anderson <mcanders1@gmail.com>
2023-03-20 21:17:02 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(scene.resources.len(), 1);
|
|
|
|
assert!(scene.resources[0].represents::<ResourceA>());
|
|
|
|
}
|
bevy_scene: Add `SceneFilter` (#6793)
# Objective
Currently, `DynamicScene`s extract all components listed in the given
(or the world's) type registry. This acts as a quasi-filter of sorts.
However, it can be troublesome to use effectively and lacks decent
control.
For example, say you need to serialize only the following component over
the network:
```rust
#[derive(Reflect, Component, Default)]
#[reflect(Component)]
struct NPC {
name: Option<String>
}
```
To do this, you'd need to:
1. Create a new `AppTypeRegistry`
2. Register `NPC`
3. Register `Option<String>`
If we skip Step 3, then the entire scene might fail to serialize as
`Option<String>` requires registration.
Not only is this annoying and easy to forget, but it can leave users
with an impossible task: serializing a third-party type that contains
private types.
Generally, the third-party crate will register their private types
within a plugin so the user doesn't need to do it themselves. However,
this means we are now unable to serialize _just_ that type— we're forced
to allow everything!
## Solution
Add the `SceneFilter` enum for filtering components to extract.
This filter can be used to optionally allow or deny entire sets of
components/resources. With the `DynamicSceneBuilder`, users have more
control over how their `DynamicScene`s are built.
To only serialize a subset of components, use the `allow` method:
```rust
let scene = builder
.allow::<ComponentA>()
.allow::<ComponentB>()
.extract_entity(entity)
.build();
```
To serialize everything _but_ a subset of components, use the `deny`
method:
```rust
let scene = builder
.deny::<ComponentA>()
.deny::<ComponentB>()
.extract_entity(entity)
.build();
```
Or create a custom filter:
```rust
let components = HashSet::from([type_id]);
let filter = SceneFilter::Allowlist(components);
// let filter = SceneFilter::Denylist(components);
let scene = builder
.with_filter(Some(filter))
.extract_entity(entity)
.build();
```
Similar operations exist for resources:
<details>
<summary>View Resource Methods</summary>
To only serialize a subset of resources, use the `allow_resource`
method:
```rust
let scene = builder
.allow_resource::<ResourceA>()
.extract_resources()
.build();
```
To serialize everything _but_ a subset of resources, use the
`deny_resource` method:
```rust
let scene = builder
.deny_resource::<ResourceA>()
.extract_resources()
.build();
```
Or create a custom filter:
```rust
let resources = HashSet::from([type_id]);
let filter = SceneFilter::Allowlist(resources);
// let filter = SceneFilter::Denylist(resources);
let scene = builder
.with_resource_filter(Some(filter))
.extract_resources()
.build();
```
</details>
### Open Questions
- [x] ~~`allow` and `deny` are mutually exclusive. Currently, they
overwrite each other. Should this instead be a panic?~~ Took @soqb's
suggestion and made it so that the opposing method simply removes that
type from the list.
- [x] ~~`DynamicSceneBuilder` extracts entity data as soon as
`extract_entity`/`extract_entities` is called. Should this behavior
instead be moved to the `build` method to prevent ordering mixups (e.g.
`.allow::<Foo>().extract_entity(entity)` vs
`.extract_entity(entity).allow::<Foo>()`)? The tradeoff would be
iterating over the given entities twice: once at extraction and again at
build.~~ Based on the feedback from @Testare it sounds like it might be
better to just keep the current functionality (if anything we can open a
separate PR that adds deferred methods for extraction, so the
choice/performance hit is up to the user).
- [ ] An alternative might be to remove the filter from
`DynamicSceneBuilder` and have it as a separate parameter to the
extraction methods (either in the existing ones or as added
`extract_entity_with_filter`-type methods). Is this preferable?
- [x] ~~Should we include constructors that include common types to
allow/deny? For example, a `SceneFilter::standard_allowlist` that
includes things like `Parent` and `Children`?~~ Consensus suggests we
should. I may split this out into a followup PR, though.
- [x] ~~Should we add the ability to remove types from the filter
regardless of whether an allowlist or denylist (e.g.
`filter.remove::<Foo>()`)?~~ See the first list item
- [x] ~~Should `SceneFilter` be an enum? Would it make more sense as a
struct that contains an `is_denylist` boolean?~~ With the added
`SceneFilter::None` state (replacing the need to wrap in an `Option` or
rely on an empty `Denylist`), it seems an enum is better suited now
- [x] ~~Bikeshed: Do we like the naming convention? Should we instead
use `include`/`exclude` terminology?~~ Sounds like we're sticking with
`allow`/`deny`!
- [x] ~~Does this feature need a new example? Do we simply include it in
the existing one (maybe even as a comment?)? Should this be done in a
followup PR instead?~~ Example will be added in a followup PR
### Followup Tasks
- [ ] Add a dedicated `SceneFilter` example
- [ ] Possibly add default types to the filter (e.g. deny things like
`ComputedVisibility`, allow `Parent`, etc)
---
## Changelog
- Added the `SceneFilter` enum for filtering components and resources
when building a `DynamicScene`
- Added methods:
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::with_filter`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::allow`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::deny`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::allow_all`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::deny_all`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::with_resource_filter`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::allow_resource`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::deny_resource`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::allow_all_resources`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::deny_all_resources`
- Removed methods:
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::from_world_with_type_registry`
- `DynamicScene::from_scene` and `DynamicScene::from_world` no longer
require an `AppTypeRegistry` reference
## Migration Guide
- `DynamicScene::from_scene` and `DynamicScene::from_world` no longer
require an `AppTypeRegistry` reference:
```rust
// OLD
let registry = world.resource::<AppTypeRegistry>();
let dynamic_scene = DynamicScene::from_world(&world, registry);
// let dynamic_scene = DynamicScene::from_scene(&scene, registry);
// NEW
let dynamic_scene = DynamicScene::from_world(&world);
// let dynamic_scene = DynamicScene::from_scene(&scene);
```
- Removed `DynamicSceneBuilder::from_world_with_type_registry`. Now the
registry is automatically taken from the given world:
```rust
// OLD
let registry = world.resource::<AppTypeRegistry>();
let builder = DynamicSceneBuilder::from_world_with_type_registry(&world,
registry);
// NEW
let builder = DynamicSceneBuilder::from_world(&world);
```
2023-07-06 21:04:26 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
|
|
fn should_extract_allowed_components() {
|
|
|
|
let mut world = World::default();
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
let atr = AppTypeRegistry::default();
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
let mut register = atr.write();
|
|
|
|
register.register::<ComponentA>();
|
|
|
|
register.register::<ComponentB>();
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
world.insert_resource(atr);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
let entity_a_b = world.spawn((ComponentA, ComponentB)).id();
|
|
|
|
let entity_a = world.spawn(ComponentA).id();
|
|
|
|
let entity_b = world.spawn(ComponentB).id();
|
|
|
|
|
2023-10-09 19:46:17 +00:00
|
|
|
let scene = DynamicSceneBuilder::from_world(&world)
|
2024-09-15 14:37:32 +00:00
|
|
|
.allow_component::<ComponentA>()
|
2023-10-09 19:46:17 +00:00
|
|
|
.extract_entities([entity_a_b, entity_a, entity_b].into_iter())
|
|
|
|
.build();
|
bevy_scene: Add `SceneFilter` (#6793)
# Objective
Currently, `DynamicScene`s extract all components listed in the given
(or the world's) type registry. This acts as a quasi-filter of sorts.
However, it can be troublesome to use effectively and lacks decent
control.
For example, say you need to serialize only the following component over
the network:
```rust
#[derive(Reflect, Component, Default)]
#[reflect(Component)]
struct NPC {
name: Option<String>
}
```
To do this, you'd need to:
1. Create a new `AppTypeRegistry`
2. Register `NPC`
3. Register `Option<String>`
If we skip Step 3, then the entire scene might fail to serialize as
`Option<String>` requires registration.
Not only is this annoying and easy to forget, but it can leave users
with an impossible task: serializing a third-party type that contains
private types.
Generally, the third-party crate will register their private types
within a plugin so the user doesn't need to do it themselves. However,
this means we are now unable to serialize _just_ that type— we're forced
to allow everything!
## Solution
Add the `SceneFilter` enum for filtering components to extract.
This filter can be used to optionally allow or deny entire sets of
components/resources. With the `DynamicSceneBuilder`, users have more
control over how their `DynamicScene`s are built.
To only serialize a subset of components, use the `allow` method:
```rust
let scene = builder
.allow::<ComponentA>()
.allow::<ComponentB>()
.extract_entity(entity)
.build();
```
To serialize everything _but_ a subset of components, use the `deny`
method:
```rust
let scene = builder
.deny::<ComponentA>()
.deny::<ComponentB>()
.extract_entity(entity)
.build();
```
Or create a custom filter:
```rust
let components = HashSet::from([type_id]);
let filter = SceneFilter::Allowlist(components);
// let filter = SceneFilter::Denylist(components);
let scene = builder
.with_filter(Some(filter))
.extract_entity(entity)
.build();
```
Similar operations exist for resources:
<details>
<summary>View Resource Methods</summary>
To only serialize a subset of resources, use the `allow_resource`
method:
```rust
let scene = builder
.allow_resource::<ResourceA>()
.extract_resources()
.build();
```
To serialize everything _but_ a subset of resources, use the
`deny_resource` method:
```rust
let scene = builder
.deny_resource::<ResourceA>()
.extract_resources()
.build();
```
Or create a custom filter:
```rust
let resources = HashSet::from([type_id]);
let filter = SceneFilter::Allowlist(resources);
// let filter = SceneFilter::Denylist(resources);
let scene = builder
.with_resource_filter(Some(filter))
.extract_resources()
.build();
```
</details>
### Open Questions
- [x] ~~`allow` and `deny` are mutually exclusive. Currently, they
overwrite each other. Should this instead be a panic?~~ Took @soqb's
suggestion and made it so that the opposing method simply removes that
type from the list.
- [x] ~~`DynamicSceneBuilder` extracts entity data as soon as
`extract_entity`/`extract_entities` is called. Should this behavior
instead be moved to the `build` method to prevent ordering mixups (e.g.
`.allow::<Foo>().extract_entity(entity)` vs
`.extract_entity(entity).allow::<Foo>()`)? The tradeoff would be
iterating over the given entities twice: once at extraction and again at
build.~~ Based on the feedback from @Testare it sounds like it might be
better to just keep the current functionality (if anything we can open a
separate PR that adds deferred methods for extraction, so the
choice/performance hit is up to the user).
- [ ] An alternative might be to remove the filter from
`DynamicSceneBuilder` and have it as a separate parameter to the
extraction methods (either in the existing ones or as added
`extract_entity_with_filter`-type methods). Is this preferable?
- [x] ~~Should we include constructors that include common types to
allow/deny? For example, a `SceneFilter::standard_allowlist` that
includes things like `Parent` and `Children`?~~ Consensus suggests we
should. I may split this out into a followup PR, though.
- [x] ~~Should we add the ability to remove types from the filter
regardless of whether an allowlist or denylist (e.g.
`filter.remove::<Foo>()`)?~~ See the first list item
- [x] ~~Should `SceneFilter` be an enum? Would it make more sense as a
struct that contains an `is_denylist` boolean?~~ With the added
`SceneFilter::None` state (replacing the need to wrap in an `Option` or
rely on an empty `Denylist`), it seems an enum is better suited now
- [x] ~~Bikeshed: Do we like the naming convention? Should we instead
use `include`/`exclude` terminology?~~ Sounds like we're sticking with
`allow`/`deny`!
- [x] ~~Does this feature need a new example? Do we simply include it in
the existing one (maybe even as a comment?)? Should this be done in a
followup PR instead?~~ Example will be added in a followup PR
### Followup Tasks
- [ ] Add a dedicated `SceneFilter` example
- [ ] Possibly add default types to the filter (e.g. deny things like
`ComputedVisibility`, allow `Parent`, etc)
---
## Changelog
- Added the `SceneFilter` enum for filtering components and resources
when building a `DynamicScene`
- Added methods:
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::with_filter`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::allow`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::deny`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::allow_all`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::deny_all`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::with_resource_filter`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::allow_resource`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::deny_resource`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::allow_all_resources`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::deny_all_resources`
- Removed methods:
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::from_world_with_type_registry`
- `DynamicScene::from_scene` and `DynamicScene::from_world` no longer
require an `AppTypeRegistry` reference
## Migration Guide
- `DynamicScene::from_scene` and `DynamicScene::from_world` no longer
require an `AppTypeRegistry` reference:
```rust
// OLD
let registry = world.resource::<AppTypeRegistry>();
let dynamic_scene = DynamicScene::from_world(&world, registry);
// let dynamic_scene = DynamicScene::from_scene(&scene, registry);
// NEW
let dynamic_scene = DynamicScene::from_world(&world);
// let dynamic_scene = DynamicScene::from_scene(&scene);
```
- Removed `DynamicSceneBuilder::from_world_with_type_registry`. Now the
registry is automatically taken from the given world:
```rust
// OLD
let registry = world.resource::<AppTypeRegistry>();
let builder = DynamicSceneBuilder::from_world_with_type_registry(&world,
registry);
// NEW
let builder = DynamicSceneBuilder::from_world(&world);
```
2023-07-06 21:04:26 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(scene.entities.len(), 3);
|
|
|
|
assert!(scene.entities[0].components[0].represents::<ComponentA>());
|
|
|
|
assert!(scene.entities[1].components[0].represents::<ComponentA>());
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(scene.entities[2].components.len(), 0);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
|
|
fn should_not_extract_denied_components() {
|
|
|
|
let mut world = World::default();
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
let atr = AppTypeRegistry::default();
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
let mut register = atr.write();
|
|
|
|
register.register::<ComponentA>();
|
|
|
|
register.register::<ComponentB>();
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
world.insert_resource(atr);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
let entity_a_b = world.spawn((ComponentA, ComponentB)).id();
|
|
|
|
let entity_a = world.spawn(ComponentA).id();
|
|
|
|
let entity_b = world.spawn(ComponentB).id();
|
|
|
|
|
2023-10-09 19:46:17 +00:00
|
|
|
let scene = DynamicSceneBuilder::from_world(&world)
|
2024-09-15 14:37:32 +00:00
|
|
|
.deny_component::<ComponentA>()
|
2023-10-09 19:46:17 +00:00
|
|
|
.extract_entities([entity_a_b, entity_a, entity_b].into_iter())
|
|
|
|
.build();
|
bevy_scene: Add `SceneFilter` (#6793)
# Objective
Currently, `DynamicScene`s extract all components listed in the given
(or the world's) type registry. This acts as a quasi-filter of sorts.
However, it can be troublesome to use effectively and lacks decent
control.
For example, say you need to serialize only the following component over
the network:
```rust
#[derive(Reflect, Component, Default)]
#[reflect(Component)]
struct NPC {
name: Option<String>
}
```
To do this, you'd need to:
1. Create a new `AppTypeRegistry`
2. Register `NPC`
3. Register `Option<String>`
If we skip Step 3, then the entire scene might fail to serialize as
`Option<String>` requires registration.
Not only is this annoying and easy to forget, but it can leave users
with an impossible task: serializing a third-party type that contains
private types.
Generally, the third-party crate will register their private types
within a plugin so the user doesn't need to do it themselves. However,
this means we are now unable to serialize _just_ that type— we're forced
to allow everything!
## Solution
Add the `SceneFilter` enum for filtering components to extract.
This filter can be used to optionally allow or deny entire sets of
components/resources. With the `DynamicSceneBuilder`, users have more
control over how their `DynamicScene`s are built.
To only serialize a subset of components, use the `allow` method:
```rust
let scene = builder
.allow::<ComponentA>()
.allow::<ComponentB>()
.extract_entity(entity)
.build();
```
To serialize everything _but_ a subset of components, use the `deny`
method:
```rust
let scene = builder
.deny::<ComponentA>()
.deny::<ComponentB>()
.extract_entity(entity)
.build();
```
Or create a custom filter:
```rust
let components = HashSet::from([type_id]);
let filter = SceneFilter::Allowlist(components);
// let filter = SceneFilter::Denylist(components);
let scene = builder
.with_filter(Some(filter))
.extract_entity(entity)
.build();
```
Similar operations exist for resources:
<details>
<summary>View Resource Methods</summary>
To only serialize a subset of resources, use the `allow_resource`
method:
```rust
let scene = builder
.allow_resource::<ResourceA>()
.extract_resources()
.build();
```
To serialize everything _but_ a subset of resources, use the
`deny_resource` method:
```rust
let scene = builder
.deny_resource::<ResourceA>()
.extract_resources()
.build();
```
Or create a custom filter:
```rust
let resources = HashSet::from([type_id]);
let filter = SceneFilter::Allowlist(resources);
// let filter = SceneFilter::Denylist(resources);
let scene = builder
.with_resource_filter(Some(filter))
.extract_resources()
.build();
```
</details>
### Open Questions
- [x] ~~`allow` and `deny` are mutually exclusive. Currently, they
overwrite each other. Should this instead be a panic?~~ Took @soqb's
suggestion and made it so that the opposing method simply removes that
type from the list.
- [x] ~~`DynamicSceneBuilder` extracts entity data as soon as
`extract_entity`/`extract_entities` is called. Should this behavior
instead be moved to the `build` method to prevent ordering mixups (e.g.
`.allow::<Foo>().extract_entity(entity)` vs
`.extract_entity(entity).allow::<Foo>()`)? The tradeoff would be
iterating over the given entities twice: once at extraction and again at
build.~~ Based on the feedback from @Testare it sounds like it might be
better to just keep the current functionality (if anything we can open a
separate PR that adds deferred methods for extraction, so the
choice/performance hit is up to the user).
- [ ] An alternative might be to remove the filter from
`DynamicSceneBuilder` and have it as a separate parameter to the
extraction methods (either in the existing ones or as added
`extract_entity_with_filter`-type methods). Is this preferable?
- [x] ~~Should we include constructors that include common types to
allow/deny? For example, a `SceneFilter::standard_allowlist` that
includes things like `Parent` and `Children`?~~ Consensus suggests we
should. I may split this out into a followup PR, though.
- [x] ~~Should we add the ability to remove types from the filter
regardless of whether an allowlist or denylist (e.g.
`filter.remove::<Foo>()`)?~~ See the first list item
- [x] ~~Should `SceneFilter` be an enum? Would it make more sense as a
struct that contains an `is_denylist` boolean?~~ With the added
`SceneFilter::None` state (replacing the need to wrap in an `Option` or
rely on an empty `Denylist`), it seems an enum is better suited now
- [x] ~~Bikeshed: Do we like the naming convention? Should we instead
use `include`/`exclude` terminology?~~ Sounds like we're sticking with
`allow`/`deny`!
- [x] ~~Does this feature need a new example? Do we simply include it in
the existing one (maybe even as a comment?)? Should this be done in a
followup PR instead?~~ Example will be added in a followup PR
### Followup Tasks
- [ ] Add a dedicated `SceneFilter` example
- [ ] Possibly add default types to the filter (e.g. deny things like
`ComputedVisibility`, allow `Parent`, etc)
---
## Changelog
- Added the `SceneFilter` enum for filtering components and resources
when building a `DynamicScene`
- Added methods:
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::with_filter`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::allow`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::deny`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::allow_all`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::deny_all`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::with_resource_filter`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::allow_resource`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::deny_resource`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::allow_all_resources`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::deny_all_resources`
- Removed methods:
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::from_world_with_type_registry`
- `DynamicScene::from_scene` and `DynamicScene::from_world` no longer
require an `AppTypeRegistry` reference
## Migration Guide
- `DynamicScene::from_scene` and `DynamicScene::from_world` no longer
require an `AppTypeRegistry` reference:
```rust
// OLD
let registry = world.resource::<AppTypeRegistry>();
let dynamic_scene = DynamicScene::from_world(&world, registry);
// let dynamic_scene = DynamicScene::from_scene(&scene, registry);
// NEW
let dynamic_scene = DynamicScene::from_world(&world);
// let dynamic_scene = DynamicScene::from_scene(&scene);
```
- Removed `DynamicSceneBuilder::from_world_with_type_registry`. Now the
registry is automatically taken from the given world:
```rust
// OLD
let registry = world.resource::<AppTypeRegistry>();
let builder = DynamicSceneBuilder::from_world_with_type_registry(&world,
registry);
// NEW
let builder = DynamicSceneBuilder::from_world(&world);
```
2023-07-06 21:04:26 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(scene.entities.len(), 3);
|
|
|
|
assert!(scene.entities[0].components[0].represents::<ComponentB>());
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(scene.entities[1].components.len(), 0);
|
|
|
|
assert!(scene.entities[2].components[0].represents::<ComponentB>());
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
|
|
fn should_extract_allowed_resources() {
|
|
|
|
let mut world = World::default();
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
let atr = AppTypeRegistry::default();
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
let mut register = atr.write();
|
|
|
|
register.register::<ResourceA>();
|
|
|
|
register.register::<ResourceB>();
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
world.insert_resource(atr);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
world.insert_resource(ResourceA);
|
|
|
|
world.insert_resource(ResourceB);
|
|
|
|
|
2023-10-09 19:46:17 +00:00
|
|
|
let scene = DynamicSceneBuilder::from_world(&world)
|
|
|
|
.allow_resource::<ResourceA>()
|
|
|
|
.extract_resources()
|
|
|
|
.build();
|
bevy_scene: Add `SceneFilter` (#6793)
# Objective
Currently, `DynamicScene`s extract all components listed in the given
(or the world's) type registry. This acts as a quasi-filter of sorts.
However, it can be troublesome to use effectively and lacks decent
control.
For example, say you need to serialize only the following component over
the network:
```rust
#[derive(Reflect, Component, Default)]
#[reflect(Component)]
struct NPC {
name: Option<String>
}
```
To do this, you'd need to:
1. Create a new `AppTypeRegistry`
2. Register `NPC`
3. Register `Option<String>`
If we skip Step 3, then the entire scene might fail to serialize as
`Option<String>` requires registration.
Not only is this annoying and easy to forget, but it can leave users
with an impossible task: serializing a third-party type that contains
private types.
Generally, the third-party crate will register their private types
within a plugin so the user doesn't need to do it themselves. However,
this means we are now unable to serialize _just_ that type— we're forced
to allow everything!
## Solution
Add the `SceneFilter` enum for filtering components to extract.
This filter can be used to optionally allow or deny entire sets of
components/resources. With the `DynamicSceneBuilder`, users have more
control over how their `DynamicScene`s are built.
To only serialize a subset of components, use the `allow` method:
```rust
let scene = builder
.allow::<ComponentA>()
.allow::<ComponentB>()
.extract_entity(entity)
.build();
```
To serialize everything _but_ a subset of components, use the `deny`
method:
```rust
let scene = builder
.deny::<ComponentA>()
.deny::<ComponentB>()
.extract_entity(entity)
.build();
```
Or create a custom filter:
```rust
let components = HashSet::from([type_id]);
let filter = SceneFilter::Allowlist(components);
// let filter = SceneFilter::Denylist(components);
let scene = builder
.with_filter(Some(filter))
.extract_entity(entity)
.build();
```
Similar operations exist for resources:
<details>
<summary>View Resource Methods</summary>
To only serialize a subset of resources, use the `allow_resource`
method:
```rust
let scene = builder
.allow_resource::<ResourceA>()
.extract_resources()
.build();
```
To serialize everything _but_ a subset of resources, use the
`deny_resource` method:
```rust
let scene = builder
.deny_resource::<ResourceA>()
.extract_resources()
.build();
```
Or create a custom filter:
```rust
let resources = HashSet::from([type_id]);
let filter = SceneFilter::Allowlist(resources);
// let filter = SceneFilter::Denylist(resources);
let scene = builder
.with_resource_filter(Some(filter))
.extract_resources()
.build();
```
</details>
### Open Questions
- [x] ~~`allow` and `deny` are mutually exclusive. Currently, they
overwrite each other. Should this instead be a panic?~~ Took @soqb's
suggestion and made it so that the opposing method simply removes that
type from the list.
- [x] ~~`DynamicSceneBuilder` extracts entity data as soon as
`extract_entity`/`extract_entities` is called. Should this behavior
instead be moved to the `build` method to prevent ordering mixups (e.g.
`.allow::<Foo>().extract_entity(entity)` vs
`.extract_entity(entity).allow::<Foo>()`)? The tradeoff would be
iterating over the given entities twice: once at extraction and again at
build.~~ Based on the feedback from @Testare it sounds like it might be
better to just keep the current functionality (if anything we can open a
separate PR that adds deferred methods for extraction, so the
choice/performance hit is up to the user).
- [ ] An alternative might be to remove the filter from
`DynamicSceneBuilder` and have it as a separate parameter to the
extraction methods (either in the existing ones or as added
`extract_entity_with_filter`-type methods). Is this preferable?
- [x] ~~Should we include constructors that include common types to
allow/deny? For example, a `SceneFilter::standard_allowlist` that
includes things like `Parent` and `Children`?~~ Consensus suggests we
should. I may split this out into a followup PR, though.
- [x] ~~Should we add the ability to remove types from the filter
regardless of whether an allowlist or denylist (e.g.
`filter.remove::<Foo>()`)?~~ See the first list item
- [x] ~~Should `SceneFilter` be an enum? Would it make more sense as a
struct that contains an `is_denylist` boolean?~~ With the added
`SceneFilter::None` state (replacing the need to wrap in an `Option` or
rely on an empty `Denylist`), it seems an enum is better suited now
- [x] ~~Bikeshed: Do we like the naming convention? Should we instead
use `include`/`exclude` terminology?~~ Sounds like we're sticking with
`allow`/`deny`!
- [x] ~~Does this feature need a new example? Do we simply include it in
the existing one (maybe even as a comment?)? Should this be done in a
followup PR instead?~~ Example will be added in a followup PR
### Followup Tasks
- [ ] Add a dedicated `SceneFilter` example
- [ ] Possibly add default types to the filter (e.g. deny things like
`ComputedVisibility`, allow `Parent`, etc)
---
## Changelog
- Added the `SceneFilter` enum for filtering components and resources
when building a `DynamicScene`
- Added methods:
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::with_filter`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::allow`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::deny`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::allow_all`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::deny_all`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::with_resource_filter`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::allow_resource`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::deny_resource`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::allow_all_resources`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::deny_all_resources`
- Removed methods:
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::from_world_with_type_registry`
- `DynamicScene::from_scene` and `DynamicScene::from_world` no longer
require an `AppTypeRegistry` reference
## Migration Guide
- `DynamicScene::from_scene` and `DynamicScene::from_world` no longer
require an `AppTypeRegistry` reference:
```rust
// OLD
let registry = world.resource::<AppTypeRegistry>();
let dynamic_scene = DynamicScene::from_world(&world, registry);
// let dynamic_scene = DynamicScene::from_scene(&scene, registry);
// NEW
let dynamic_scene = DynamicScene::from_world(&world);
// let dynamic_scene = DynamicScene::from_scene(&scene);
```
- Removed `DynamicSceneBuilder::from_world_with_type_registry`. Now the
registry is automatically taken from the given world:
```rust
// OLD
let registry = world.resource::<AppTypeRegistry>();
let builder = DynamicSceneBuilder::from_world_with_type_registry(&world,
registry);
// NEW
let builder = DynamicSceneBuilder::from_world(&world);
```
2023-07-06 21:04:26 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(scene.resources.len(), 1);
|
|
|
|
assert!(scene.resources[0].represents::<ResourceA>());
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
|
|
fn should_not_extract_denied_resources() {
|
|
|
|
let mut world = World::default();
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
let atr = AppTypeRegistry::default();
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
let mut register = atr.write();
|
|
|
|
register.register::<ResourceA>();
|
|
|
|
register.register::<ResourceB>();
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
world.insert_resource(atr);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
world.insert_resource(ResourceA);
|
|
|
|
world.insert_resource(ResourceB);
|
|
|
|
|
2023-10-09 19:46:17 +00:00
|
|
|
let scene = DynamicSceneBuilder::from_world(&world)
|
|
|
|
.deny_resource::<ResourceA>()
|
|
|
|
.extract_resources()
|
|
|
|
.build();
|
bevy_scene: Add `SceneFilter` (#6793)
# Objective
Currently, `DynamicScene`s extract all components listed in the given
(or the world's) type registry. This acts as a quasi-filter of sorts.
However, it can be troublesome to use effectively and lacks decent
control.
For example, say you need to serialize only the following component over
the network:
```rust
#[derive(Reflect, Component, Default)]
#[reflect(Component)]
struct NPC {
name: Option<String>
}
```
To do this, you'd need to:
1. Create a new `AppTypeRegistry`
2. Register `NPC`
3. Register `Option<String>`
If we skip Step 3, then the entire scene might fail to serialize as
`Option<String>` requires registration.
Not only is this annoying and easy to forget, but it can leave users
with an impossible task: serializing a third-party type that contains
private types.
Generally, the third-party crate will register their private types
within a plugin so the user doesn't need to do it themselves. However,
this means we are now unable to serialize _just_ that type— we're forced
to allow everything!
## Solution
Add the `SceneFilter` enum for filtering components to extract.
This filter can be used to optionally allow or deny entire sets of
components/resources. With the `DynamicSceneBuilder`, users have more
control over how their `DynamicScene`s are built.
To only serialize a subset of components, use the `allow` method:
```rust
let scene = builder
.allow::<ComponentA>()
.allow::<ComponentB>()
.extract_entity(entity)
.build();
```
To serialize everything _but_ a subset of components, use the `deny`
method:
```rust
let scene = builder
.deny::<ComponentA>()
.deny::<ComponentB>()
.extract_entity(entity)
.build();
```
Or create a custom filter:
```rust
let components = HashSet::from([type_id]);
let filter = SceneFilter::Allowlist(components);
// let filter = SceneFilter::Denylist(components);
let scene = builder
.with_filter(Some(filter))
.extract_entity(entity)
.build();
```
Similar operations exist for resources:
<details>
<summary>View Resource Methods</summary>
To only serialize a subset of resources, use the `allow_resource`
method:
```rust
let scene = builder
.allow_resource::<ResourceA>()
.extract_resources()
.build();
```
To serialize everything _but_ a subset of resources, use the
`deny_resource` method:
```rust
let scene = builder
.deny_resource::<ResourceA>()
.extract_resources()
.build();
```
Or create a custom filter:
```rust
let resources = HashSet::from([type_id]);
let filter = SceneFilter::Allowlist(resources);
// let filter = SceneFilter::Denylist(resources);
let scene = builder
.with_resource_filter(Some(filter))
.extract_resources()
.build();
```
</details>
### Open Questions
- [x] ~~`allow` and `deny` are mutually exclusive. Currently, they
overwrite each other. Should this instead be a panic?~~ Took @soqb's
suggestion and made it so that the opposing method simply removes that
type from the list.
- [x] ~~`DynamicSceneBuilder` extracts entity data as soon as
`extract_entity`/`extract_entities` is called. Should this behavior
instead be moved to the `build` method to prevent ordering mixups (e.g.
`.allow::<Foo>().extract_entity(entity)` vs
`.extract_entity(entity).allow::<Foo>()`)? The tradeoff would be
iterating over the given entities twice: once at extraction and again at
build.~~ Based on the feedback from @Testare it sounds like it might be
better to just keep the current functionality (if anything we can open a
separate PR that adds deferred methods for extraction, so the
choice/performance hit is up to the user).
- [ ] An alternative might be to remove the filter from
`DynamicSceneBuilder` and have it as a separate parameter to the
extraction methods (either in the existing ones or as added
`extract_entity_with_filter`-type methods). Is this preferable?
- [x] ~~Should we include constructors that include common types to
allow/deny? For example, a `SceneFilter::standard_allowlist` that
includes things like `Parent` and `Children`?~~ Consensus suggests we
should. I may split this out into a followup PR, though.
- [x] ~~Should we add the ability to remove types from the filter
regardless of whether an allowlist or denylist (e.g.
`filter.remove::<Foo>()`)?~~ See the first list item
- [x] ~~Should `SceneFilter` be an enum? Would it make more sense as a
struct that contains an `is_denylist` boolean?~~ With the added
`SceneFilter::None` state (replacing the need to wrap in an `Option` or
rely on an empty `Denylist`), it seems an enum is better suited now
- [x] ~~Bikeshed: Do we like the naming convention? Should we instead
use `include`/`exclude` terminology?~~ Sounds like we're sticking with
`allow`/`deny`!
- [x] ~~Does this feature need a new example? Do we simply include it in
the existing one (maybe even as a comment?)? Should this be done in a
followup PR instead?~~ Example will be added in a followup PR
### Followup Tasks
- [ ] Add a dedicated `SceneFilter` example
- [ ] Possibly add default types to the filter (e.g. deny things like
`ComputedVisibility`, allow `Parent`, etc)
---
## Changelog
- Added the `SceneFilter` enum for filtering components and resources
when building a `DynamicScene`
- Added methods:
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::with_filter`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::allow`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::deny`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::allow_all`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::deny_all`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::with_resource_filter`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::allow_resource`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::deny_resource`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::allow_all_resources`
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::deny_all_resources`
- Removed methods:
- `DynamicSceneBuilder::from_world_with_type_registry`
- `DynamicScene::from_scene` and `DynamicScene::from_world` no longer
require an `AppTypeRegistry` reference
## Migration Guide
- `DynamicScene::from_scene` and `DynamicScene::from_world` no longer
require an `AppTypeRegistry` reference:
```rust
// OLD
let registry = world.resource::<AppTypeRegistry>();
let dynamic_scene = DynamicScene::from_world(&world, registry);
// let dynamic_scene = DynamicScene::from_scene(&scene, registry);
// NEW
let dynamic_scene = DynamicScene::from_world(&world);
// let dynamic_scene = DynamicScene::from_scene(&scene);
```
- Removed `DynamicSceneBuilder::from_world_with_type_registry`. Now the
registry is automatically taken from the given world:
```rust
// OLD
let registry = world.resource::<AppTypeRegistry>();
let builder = DynamicSceneBuilder::from_world_with_type_registry(&world,
registry);
// NEW
let builder = DynamicSceneBuilder::from_world(&world);
```
2023-07-06 21:04:26 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(scene.resources.len(), 1);
|
|
|
|
assert!(scene.resources[0].represents::<ResourceB>());
|
|
|
|
}
|
2024-10-09 02:56:35 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
|
|
fn should_use_from_reflect() {
|
|
|
|
#[derive(Resource, Component, Reflect)]
|
|
|
|
#[reflect(Resource, Component)]
|
|
|
|
struct SomeType(i32);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
let mut world = World::default();
|
|
|
|
let atr = AppTypeRegistry::default();
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
let mut register = atr.write();
|
|
|
|
register.register::<SomeType>();
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
world.insert_resource(atr);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
world.insert_resource(SomeType(123));
|
|
|
|
let entity = world.spawn(SomeType(123)).id();
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
let scene = DynamicSceneBuilder::from_world(&world)
|
|
|
|
.extract_resources()
|
|
|
|
.extract_entities(vec![entity].into_iter())
|
|
|
|
.build();
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
let component = &scene.entities[0].components[0];
|
|
|
|
assert!(component
|
|
|
|
.try_as_reflect()
|
|
|
|
.expect("component should be concrete due to `FromReflect`")
|
|
|
|
.is::<SomeType>());
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
let resource = &scene.resources[0];
|
|
|
|
assert!(resource
|
|
|
|
.try_as_reflect()
|
|
|
|
.expect("resource should be concrete due to `FromReflect`")
|
|
|
|
.is::<SomeType>());
|
|
|
|
}
|
2022-10-12 01:48:16 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|